Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-qks25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T11:20:08.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Front-End Engineering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2009

Jeom Kee Paik  and
Anil Kumar Thayamballi
Jeom Kee Paik
Affiliation:
Pusan National University, Korea
Get access

Summary

Introduction

A new-build FPSO project may take 3–4 years to complete. For a successful project, a variety of steps must be carefully considered and implemented, including front-end engineering, design development, performance specifications, detailed specifications, vetting and selection of candidate yards and contractors, contract award, detailed engineering, construction, precommissioning (dock trials), sea trials, delivery, onsite commissioning, and contract acceptance.

Ship-shaped offshore units for developing offshore oil and gas fields in deep waters have been in existence in fair numbers since the early 1970s. In recent years, the complexity and size of ship-shaped offshore units have been increasing gradually; therefore, it is only natural that the issues related to designing, building, and operating these systems arise or may need revisiting in specific circumstances for the purposes of achieving a high level of the system integrity.

Moreover, in contrast to trading tankers and other types of offshore platforms, internationally agreed standards for ship-shaped offshore units are in a state of progress. In Chapter 3, we discuss how the classification societies (ABS 2004; BV 2004; DNV 2000, 2002; LR 1999) and institutions (API 2001) have, in recent years, developed guidance and rules specifically for floating, production, storage, and offloading systems (FPSOs), but there, for example, is not the unified approach to the rules that now exist for trading tankers (IACS 2005).

The requirements for designing and building ship-shaped offshore units are, in principle, different from the requirements of trading tankers because of the high level of onsite reliability necessary for long periods without the possibility of dry-docking.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
Design, Building, and Operation
 , pp. 31 - 54
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ABS (2004). Guide for building and classing floating production installations. American Bureau of Shipping, Houston, April.
Adhia, G. J., Pellegrino, S., and Ximenes, M. O. (2004a). “Practical considerations in the design and construction of FPSOs.” Proceedings of OMAE FPSO 2004, OMAE Specialty Symposium on FPSO Integrity, OMAE FPSO'04-0090, August 30–September, 2, Houston.Google Scholar
Adhia, G., Pelleguino, S., Ximenes, M. C., Awashima, Y., Kakimoto, M., and Ando, T. (2004b). Owner and shipyard perspective on new-build FPSO contracting scheme, standards and lessons. Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 16706, Houston, May.Google Scholar
API (2001). Recommended practice for planning, designing, and constructing floating production systems. (Recommended Practices, 2FPS), American Petroleum Institute, March.
Bannister, A. C., and Stacey, A. (1999). “Literature review of the fracture properties of grade A ship plate.” Proceedings of OMAE Conference, St. John, Newfoundland, July.Google Scholar
Barltrop, N. D. P., and Xu, L. (2004). “Research on bow impact loading in Glasgow.” Proceedings of OMAE Specialty Symposium on Integrity of Floating Production, Storage and Offloading (FPSO) Systems, OMAE-FPSO'04–0063,Houston, August 30–September 2.Google Scholar
Bothamley, M. (2004). Offshore processing options for oil platforms. SPE Annual Technical Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 90325, Houston, September.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BV (2004). Hull structure of production storage and offloading surface units. (Rule Note No. 497), Bureau Veritas, Paris, October.
Costa, R., Manuel, L. P., Isaac, R., Deserts, des L., Harris, R. J. S., and Bonnafos, O. (2003). A generic FPSO hull for Angolan waters. DOT, Marseilles, November.Google Scholar
DNV (2000). Structural design of offshore ships. (Offshore Standards, OS-C102). Det Norske Veritas, Oslo, October.
DNV (2002). Rules for classification of floating production and storage units. (Offshore Service Specifications, OSS-102). Det Norske Veritas, Oslo, April.
DNV (2006). Fatigue methodology for offshore ships. (Recommended Practices, DNV-RP-C206,) Det Norske Veritas, Oslo.
Drouin, P. (2006). “Brittle fracture in ships – a lingering problem.” Ships and Offshore Structures, 1(3): 229–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fyfe, A. J., and Ballard, E. J. (2003). “Prediction of green water events on FPSO vessels.” Proceedings of OMAE 2003, OMAE 2003-37452, Cancun, Mexico, June 8–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fyfe, A. J., and Ballard, E. J. (2004). “A design evaluation methodology for green water and bow impact type problems.” Proceedings of OMAE Specialty Symposium on Integrity of Floating Production, Storage and Offloading (FPSO) Systems, OMAE-FPSO'04-0065, Houston, August 30–September 2.Google Scholar
Soares, Guedes C. (2004). “Probabilistic models of wave parameters for the assessment of green water on FPSOs.” Proceedings of OMAE Specialty Symposium on Integrity of Floating Production, Storage, and Offloading (FPSO) Systems, OMAE–FPSO'04-0061,Houston, August 30–September 2.Google Scholar
Hodgson, T., and Barltrop, N. D. P. (2004). “Structural response of bow type structures to impact by steep fronted waves and resulting structural design.” Proceedings of OMAE Specialty Symposium on Integrity of Floating Production, Storage and Offloading (FPSO) Systems, OMAE–FPSO'04-0064, Houston, August 30–September 2.Google Scholar
HSE (2005). Wave slap loading on FPSO bows. (Research Report 324), Health and Safety Executive, UK.
IACS (2005). Common structural rules for double hull oil tankers. International Association of Classification Societies, December.
Kennedy, J. R. (1993). Cost trends in international petroleum activities. SPE Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 26410, Houston, October.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleefsman, K. M., and Veldman, A. E. P. (2004). “An improved volume-of-fluid (IVOF) method for wave impact type problems.” Proceedings of OMAE Specialty Symposium on Integrity of Floating Production, Storage, and Offloading (FPSO) Systems, OMAE–FPSO'04-0066,Houston, August 30–September 2.Google Scholar
Lacey, P., Hee, D., Chen, H., and Cardone, V. (2003). “Tow simulation.” SNAME Transactions, 111: 79–96.Google Scholar
Liu, D., Spencer, J., Itoh, T., Kawachi, S., and Shiegmatsu, K. (1992). “Dynamic load approach in tanker design.” SNAME Transactions, 100: 143–172.Google Scholar
LR (1999). Rules and regulations for the classification of a floating offshore installation at a fixed location. Lloyd's Register, London.
Olsen, A. S., Schroter, C., and Jensen, J. J. (2006). “Wave height distribution observed by ships in the North Atlantic.” Ships and Offshore Structures, 1(1): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paik, J. K., Lee, J. M., Hwang, J. S., and Park, Y. I. (2003). “A time-dependent corrosion wastage model for the structures of single- and double-hull tankers and FSOs and FPSOs.” Marine Technology, 40(3): 201–217.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K., and Thayamballi, A. K. (2003). Ultimate limit state design of steel-plated structures. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Parker, G. (1999). The FPSO design and construction guidance manual. Reserve Technology Institute, Houston.Google Scholar
Sumpter, J. D. G., and Kent, J. S. (2004). “Prediction of ship brittle fracture casualty rates by a probabilistic method.” Marine Structures, 17: 575–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voogt, A., and Buchner, B. (2004). “Wave impacts excitation on ship-type offshore structures in steep fronted waves.” Proceedings of OMAE Specialty Symposium on Integrity of Floating Production, Storage, and Offloading (FPSO) Systems, OMAE–FPSO'04-0062,Houston, August 30–September 2.Google Scholar
Ximenes, M. C., Adhia, G., and Abe, A. (1997). “Design and construction of a floating storage and offloading vessel Escravos LPG FSO.” SNAME Transactions, 105: 455–489.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×