Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T10:31:10.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Fundamentals of Opinion Formation

from Part I - Foundations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2014

Wendy W. Moe
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
David A. Schweidel
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Get access

Summary

Before we jump into how organizations can build their social media intelligence capabilities, we first need to understand the science of opinions. Behind every social media comment posted is a person with an opinion. However, not everyone with an opinion chooses to share that opinion online. The opinions we see posted to social media are an outcome of a two-stage process. In the first stage, we form our opinions (opinion formation). Then, in the second stage, we share our opinions with others (opinion expression). However, we don’t share all of our opinions. Instead, the opinions that we ultimately post online are those that somehow merit sharing. In other words, the opinion expression stage can be thought of as an opinion filter that allows some of our opinions to pass through to be posted on social media while our other opinions remain unshared (see Figure 2.1).

To illustrate the distinction between opinion formation and expression, here’s an offline example that most of us are familiar with: the Monday morning quarterback. We all know one, and chances are we know more than one. The Monday morning quarterback has well-developed opinions about Sunday’s football games and wants to share those opinions with anyone willing to listen: Which plays should have been run. Which players should have been substituted. Which calls were blown by the officials and should have been challenged.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fader, Peter S., and Hardie, Bruce G. S.. “Modeling Consumer Choice among SKUs.” Journal of Marketing Research 33.4 (1996): 442–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elberse, Anita. “The Power of Stars: Do Star Actors Drive the Success of Movies?Journal of Marketing 71.4 (2007): 102–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshi, Amit M., and Hanssens, Dominique M.. “Movie Advertising and the Stock Market Valuation of Studios: A Case of ‘Great Expectations?’Marketing Science 28.2 (2009): 239–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Yong. “Word of Mouth for Movies: Its Dynamics and Impact on Box Office Revenue.” Journal of Marketing 70.3 (2006): 74–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuksov, Dmitri, and Xie, Ying. “Pricing, Frills, and Customer Ratings.” Marketing Science 29.5 (2010): 925–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alba, Joseph W., and Hutchinson, J.. “Dimensions of Consumer Expertise.” Journal of Consumer Research 13.4 (1987): 411–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajzen, Icek. “The Theory of Planned Behavior.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50.2 (1991): 179–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Everett M.Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed. New York: Free Press, 2003Google Scholar
Bell, David R., and Song, Sangyoung. “Neighborhood Effects and Trial on the Internet: Evidence from Online Grocery Retailing.” Quantitative Marketing and Economics 5.4 (2007): 361–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McShane, Blakeley B., Bradlow, Eric T., and Berger, Jonah. “Visual Influence and Social Groups.” Journal of Marketing Research 49.6 (2011): 854–71Google Scholar
Elberse, Anita. “Blockbuster or Bust.” Wall Street Journal, January 3, 2009Google Scholar
Bikhchandani, Sushil, Hirshleifer, David, and Welch, Ivo. “A Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom, and Cultural Change as Informational CascadesJournal of Political Economy 100.5 (1992): 992–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Juanjuan. “The Sound of Silence: Observational Learning in the U.S. Kidney Market.” Marketing Science 29.2 (2010): 315–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, David W.The Opinion Makers: An Insider Exposes the Truth behind the Polls. Boston: Beacon Press, 2008, p. 112Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×