Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T00:20:59.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - An empirical analysis of the effects of social policies on fertility, labour market participation and hourly wages of European women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Daniela Del Boca
Affiliation:
Professor University of Turin
Silvia Pasqua
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor University of Turin
Chiara Pronzato
Affiliation:
Ph.D student in Economics Institute for Social and Economic Research University of Essex
Cécile Wetzels
Affiliation:
Senior Researcher in the Department of Economics University of Amsterdam
Daniela del Boca
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Torino, Italy
Cécile Wetzels
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In this chapter, we explore the impact of social policies on the joint decisions of women's labour market participation and fertility and on wages. We use the European Community Household Panel (ECHP), a longitudinal survey coordinated and supported by Eurostat. The survey involves a representative sample of households and individuals interviewed for eight years (1994–2001) in each of the fifteen European Union (EU) Member States existing at that time. The standardised methodology and procedure in data collection yield comparable information across countries, making the ECHP a unique source of information for cross-country analyses at the European level. The aim of the survey, in fact, is to provide comparable information on the EU population, representative at both the longitudinal and the crosswise level. The data collected cover a wide range of topics on living conditions (income, employment, poverty and social exclusion, housing, health, migration and other social indicators). Therefore, the ECHP survey allows us to make analyses of how individuals and households experience change in their socio-economic environment and how they respond to such changes, and analyses of how conditions, life events, behaviour and values are linked to each other dynamically over time.

This empirical chapter is organised as follows: section 8.2 contains an empirical analysis of the simultaneous women's choice of working and having children in which the results of different specifications are presented and compared. In section 8.3 an empirical analysis of women's wages determinants is presented. Section 8.4 concludes.

Type
Chapter
Information
Social Policies, Labour Markets and Motherhood
A Comparative Analysis of European Countries
, pp. 271 - 303
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abowd, J. M. and Farber, H. S 1982. ‘Job queues and the union status of workers’, Industrial and Labour Relations Review 43: 354–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. S. 1985. ‘Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labour’, Journal of Labour Economics 106 (4), 979–1014.Google Scholar
Bologna, S., and Fumagalli, A. 1997. Il lavoro autonomo di seconda generazione. Milan: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Carré, F. 2003. ‘Nonstandard work arrangements in France and the United States: institutional contexts, labour market conditions, and patterns of use’, in Houseman, S. and Osawa, M. (eds.), Nonstandard Work in Developed Economies: Causes and Consequence: 131–74, Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.Google Scholar
Cebrían, I., G. Moreno and L. Toharia 2001. ‘Trabaja a tiempo parcial y duración de la jornada en la Unión Europea: Características, salarios, pobreza’, in Garrido, L. and Tohario, L. (eds.), Análisis del Panel de Hogares de la Unión Europea, Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Estadística.Google Scholar
Cebrían, I., G. Moreno, M. Samek, R. Semenza and L. Toharia 2003. ‘Nonstandard work in Italy and Spain: the quest for flexibility at the margin in two supposedly rigid labour markets’, in Houseman, S. and Osawa, M. (eds.), Nonstandard Work in Developed Economies: Causes and Consequence: 89–130, Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.Google Scholar
D'Addio, A. C. and M. Mira d'Ercole 2005. ‘Trends and determinants of fertility rates: the role of policies’, OECD Social Employment and Migration Working Papers 27, OECD Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs.
Davia, M. A. and Hernanz, V. 2002. ‘Temporary employment and segmentation in the Spanish labour market: an empirical analysis through the study of wage differentials’, Documento de Trabajo 2002–26, Madrid: FEDEA.Google Scholar
Luca, L. and Bruni, M. 1993. Unemployment and Labour Market Flexibility: Italy, Geneva: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
Del Boca, D. and S. Pasqua 2005. ‘Labour supply and fertility in Europe and the U.S.’, in Boeri, T., Del Boca, D. and Pissarides, C. (eds.), Women at Work: An Economic Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Del Boca, D., Pasqua, S. and Pronzato, C. 2005. ‘Employment and fertility decisions in Italy, France and the U.K.’, Labour 19 (special issue), 51–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eurostat, 1999. Demographic Statistics. Luxembourg: Office for official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Eurostat 2002. ECHP UDB Description of variables, Data Dictionary, Codebook, and Differences between countries and waves, doc Pan 166/2002–12.
Garrone, G. and C. Villosio 2001. ‘Un'analisi longitudinale dei percorsi lavorativi e dei differenziali retributivi degli occupati part-time’, in Samek Ludovici, M. and Semenza, R. (eds.), Le Forme del Lavoro: 181–204, Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Heckman, J. 1979. ‘Sample selection bias as a specification error’, Econometrica 47: 153–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hotz, V. J. and Miller, R. A. 1988. ‘An empirical analysis of lifecycle fertility and female labor supply’, Econometrica 56 (1), 91–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isfol 1998. ‘Il lavoro in Italia: profili, percorsi, politiche’, Unpublished manuscript.
Istat, 2000. Rapporto Annuale: La situazione del paese nel 1999Rome: Istat.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, M. and Wolpin, K. I. 1980. ‘Life-cycle labor supply and fertility: casual inferences from household models’, Journal of Political Economy 88 (2), 328–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tunali, Insan 1986. ‘A general structure for models of double selection and an application to a joint migration/earnings process with remigration’, Research in Labour Economics 8 (part B), 235–82.Google Scholar
Waldfogel, J. 1995. ‘The price of motherhood: family status and women's pay in a young British cohort’, Oxford Economic Papers 47: 584–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetzels, C. 2002. ‘Dutch women's productivity in the labour market: is there a double selection into motherhood and less demanding jobs?’, Working paper, presented at IZA Bonn workshop: The Future of Family and Work: Evaluation of Family Friendly Policies, 10–11 May.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×