Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T23:29:33.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Making time for working parents: comparing public childcare provision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Jérôme De Henau
Affiliation:
Researcher of Applied Economics Université Libre de Bruxelles (DULBEA)
Danièle Meulders
Affiliation:
Professor of Economics University of Brussels
Síle O'Dorchai
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Economics Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)
Daniela del Boca
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Torino, Italy
Cécile Wetzels
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Early childhood education and care differ substantially across countries. First, opinions diverge as to the optimal age at which children's socialisation should begin, that is, the age at which children should be cared for outside the family circle, and these differences are reflected in the way a country's childcare system is organised (Letablier 1998). Some countries emphasise the importance of outside childcare options being available for children from as early as the end of maternity leave onwards. Others are in favour of children being cared for in the close family circle when they are very young and do not focus on developing outside care until children are 3 years of age (and up to the age at which they enter primary school). Second, countries also differ as to the sharing of childcare responsibilities between the domestic, the public and the private sphere. In some countries, ‘having children’ is considered to be a private choice, so that parents have to pay for the cost of children. In others, it is considered to be a public matter, in which case the state helps parents maintain their standard of living when they decide to have children. As a result, the former countries rely heavily on market intervention, while the latter focus on making the public system as all-encompassing as possible.

Governments can act on three levels to provide care for children and to avoid deterring dual-earner families from having children.

Type
Chapter
Information
Social Policies, Labour Markets and Motherhood
A Comparative Analysis of European Countries
, pp. 28 - 62
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adema, W. 2001. ‘An overview of benefits that foster the reconciliation of work and family life in OECD countries’, Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers, no. 20.
Berg-le Clercq, L. E, Heuvel, A. and Snellen, D. M. E. G. W. 2002. Kinderopvang in gemeenten, de monitor over 2001, Rapport in opdracht van het ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid, opgesteld door SGBO, Onderzoeks- en Adviesbureau van de Vereniging van Nederlandse Gemeenten BV, Den Haag.Google Scholar
Boyer, D. 1999. ‘Normes et politique familiale: La question du libre choix du mode de garde’, Recherches et prévisions, no. 57/58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, J. and N. Finch 2002. A Comparison of Child Benefit Packages in 22 Countries. A report of research carried out by the University of York on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions, Research Report no.174, Leeds. (www.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd5/rrep174.asp)
Bruning, G. and , J. Plantenga 1999. ‘Parental leave and equal opportunities: experiences in eight European countries’, Journal of European Social Policy, 9(3), 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Boca, D. and Repetto-Alaia, M. 2003. Women's Work, the Family, and Social Policy: Focus on Italy in a European Perspective, New York: Peter Langs Publishing, 216 pp.Google Scholar
Del Boca, D., , M. Locatelli and Pasqua, S. 2000. ‘Employment decisions of married women: evidence and explanations’, Labour 14, 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Boca, D., , M. Locatelli and , D. Vuri 2003. ‘Child care choices by Italian households’, CHILD Working Paper 30.Google Scholar
, Eurostat 2002. ‘Feasibility study on the availability of comparable childcare statistics in the EU’, Eurostat Working Paper, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Eurybase Eurydice Network database (www.eurydice.org/Doc_intermediaires/indicators/en/fameset_key_data.html)
Eurydice 2002. Key Data on Education in Europe – 2002 Edition, Luxembourg: European Commission / Eurostat (www.eurydice.org/Eurybase/frameset_ eurybase.html)
Fagnani, J. 2001. ‘Politique d'accueil de la petite enfance en France: ombres et lunmières’, Travail, genre et sociétés, n. 06 (Paris).Google Scholar
Fenet, F., Leprince, F. and Périer, L. 2001. Les modes d'accueil des jeunes enfants, ed. ASH, Paris.Google Scholar
Fiene, R. 2002. 13 Indicators of Quality Child Care: Research Update, presented to Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation and Health Resources and Services Administration/Maternal and Child Health Bureau, US Department of Health and Human Services.
Goldstein, H. 2003. Analysis of 1997 French Pupil Panel Daga Study, Report of Ministry of Education (DEP), June.
Gornick, J. and M. Meyers 2000. ‘Early childhood education and care (ECEC): cross-national variation in service organisation and financing’, paper prepared for presention at A Consultative Meeting on International Developments in Early Childhood Education and Care: An Activity of the Columbia Institute for Child and Family Policy, New York City, 11–12 May.
Gornick, J., Meyers, M. and Ross, K. 1997. ‘Supporting the employment of mothers: policy variation across fourteen welfare states’, Journal of European Social Policy 7, (1) 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustafsson, S. 1994. ‘Childcare and types of welfare states’, in Sainsbury, D., Gendering Welfare State, London: Thousand Oaks, 45–61.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, S., E. Kenjoh and C. Wetzels 2001. ‘A new crisis in european populations: do modern family policies help?’, in Pieters, D. (ed.), Confidence and Changes: Managing Social Protection in the New Millennium, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 119–41.Google Scholar
Kamerman, S. B. 2001. ‘Early Childhood Education and Care: International Perspectives’, Testimony prepared for the United States Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, 27 March.
Kind en Gezin, 2002. Annual Report. Brussels.Google Scholar
Kytir, J. and Schrittwiezer, K. 2002. Haushaltsführung, Kinderbetreuung, Pflege, Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus, Vienna: Bundesministerium für soziale Sicherheit, Generationen und Konsumentenschutz, September.Google Scholar
Leprince, F. 2003. L'accueil des jeunes enfants en france : Etat des lieux et pistes d'amélioration, Rapport au Haut Conseil de la population et de la famille, January.Google Scholar
Letablier, M.-T. 1998. Comparing Family Policies in Europe, Periodic Progress Report no. 1 of the Thematic Network: ‘Working and Mothering: Social practices and Social Policies’, TSER Programme of the European Commission, Area III: Research into Social Integration and Social Exclusion in Europe, 1st TSER Seminar held in Lund, 26–28 November.
Letablier, M. -T. and G. Rieucau 2001. ‘La garde des enfants: une affaire d'Etat ?’, Document de travail, Centre d’études de l'emploi, no. 06.
Martin, C. 2003. ‘L'accueil des jeunes enfants en Europe: Quelles leçons pour le cas français’, in Leprince, F., L'accueil des jeunes enfants en France: Etat des lieux et pistes d'amélioration, Rapport au Haut Conseil de la population et de la famille, January.Google Scholar
Math, A. 2003. ‘Les politiques publiques d'aide aux familles en Europe occidentale et leurs évolutions depuis le début des années 1990. Une comparaison menée à partir de plusieurs méthodes’, Rapport réalisé par l'Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES) avec le soutien de la Caisse Nationale des Allocations Familiales (CNAF), June.
Ministry of Social Affairs and Health 2004. Early Childhood Education and Care in Finland, Brochure: 14, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Oasis website (Information on Public Services) (www.oasis.gov.ie/education/)
OECD 2001a. Starting Strong: Early Childhood Education and Care, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD 2001b. Social Expenditures, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD 2002. Babies and Bosses, I, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD 2003a. Babies and Bosses, II, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD 2003b. Education Database. Paris.Google Scholar
ONE 2002. Rapport d'activités, Brussels: Office de la Naissance et de l'Enfance.Google Scholar
Périvier, H. 2003. ‘Emploi des mères et garde des jeunes enfants: l'impossible réforme?’, Droit Social, no. 9–10.
Rostgaard, T. and , T. Fridberg 1998. ‘Caring for children and older people: a comparison of European policies and practices’, Social Security in Europe 6. Copenhagen: Danish National Institute of Social Research 98:20.Google Scholar
Salzman, J. 2003. ‘Methodological choices encountered in the construction of composite indices of economic and social well-being’, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Economics Association, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, 30 May–1 June, 33 pp.Google Scholar
Skolverket 2004. ‘Children, pupils and staff: national level’, in Official Statistics of Sweden on pre-school activities, school-age child care, schools and adult education, Report 244, part 2.
Statistics Denmark 2005. Statistical Yearbook 2005.
The Clearinghouse on International Developments in Child, Youth and Family Policies 2003. http://childpolicyintl.org/
TSFEPS 2002. Changing Family Structure and Social Policy: Childcare Services in Europe and Social Cohesion, National Reports. (www/emes.net/en/recherche/tsfeps/etudes.php)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×