Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T12:19:34.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Domestication as a human–animal relationship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Nerissa Russell
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

Just as humans have a history of their relations with animals, so also animals have a history of their relations with humans. Only humans, however, construct narratives of this history. Such narratives range from what we might regard as myths of totemic origin to supposedly “scientific” accounts of the origins of domestication. And however we might choose to distinguish between myth and science, they have in common that they tell us as much about how the narrators view their own humanity as they do about their attitudes and relations to non-human animals. (Ingold 1994:1)

Domestication is another topic that has received extensive attention in zooarchaeology. Much of this work has centered on techniques to recognize domestic animals and discussions of when and where the first such animals are found. However, there has also been considerable discussion of how and why domestication came about and of its significance for humans and animals. In this chapter I focus on the latter issues: on domestication as a human–animal relationship. Domestication is surely the most important transformation in human-animal relations, with far-reaching consequences for both partners.

For reference, I provide in Table 6.1 my interpretation of the current best guesses for when and where the main domestic animals were domesticated. There are better data for some animals than others, and many dates will likely be pushed back (or occasionally moved forward) in the future. In cases where there is clear evidence for independent domestication in more than one region, I give the earlier date. As will be clear from the following discussion, there can be disagreement and uncertainty about what counts as “domesticated”; this is particularly problematic for cats, which have a long history of at least occasional commensal and perhaps pet relationships with humans, but are only morphologically domesticated rather late.

Type
Chapter
Information
Social Zooarchaeology
Humans and Animals in Prehistory
, pp. 207 - 258
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×