Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T23:36:02.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Linking thought and setting in the study of workplace learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2011

Laura M. W. Martin
Affiliation:
Arizona Science Center
Laura Martin
Affiliation:
Arizona Museum of Science and Technology
Katherine Nelson
Affiliation:
City University of New York
Get access

Summary

Introduction

One of the last projects that Sylvia Scribner supervised at the Laboratory for Cognitive Studies of Work was a project called Technical and Symbolic Knowledge in CNC Machining. Computer Numerical Control (CNC) is an electronic technology that affects the traditional organization and definition of jobs in the industrial workplace. Specifically, it introduces machines in which manual setup operations are replaced by setup dependent on electronic commands executed through a computer program. Over the three years of its existence, the CNC project looked at how machinists learn to use computer–based machine tools and sought to address several key questions about adult learning.

First, the research looked at changes in activity when electronic technology is introduced and at the nature of the relation between someone's existing technical knowledge and newly acquired symbol system based on programming code. It asked whether the new system is additive to the old, whether the new displaces the old, or whether it transforms the old system in some way. The study also asked about the forms adult learning might take and whether the formal or informal origins of the knowledge affect the application of particular concepts. What were the differences, we asked, between knowledge that is acquired through practical, hands-on activity and that which is based on abstract representation (such as computer code) learned in the classroom? In addition to questions about technical knowledge, we asked about the relation between machinists' educational backgrounds and their problem solving strategies, as well as about their images of themselves as workers.

Type
Chapter
Information
Sociocultural Psychology
Theory and Practice of Doing and Knowing
, pp. 150 - 167
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×