Book contents
- Sociological Constitutionalism
- Sociological Constitutionalism
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Sociological Constitutionalism
- Part I National Constitutions and Sociological Method
- Part II Constitutional Sociology between the National and the Transnational
- 4 Constitutionalism between Nation States and Global Law
- 5 Politics and the Political in Sociological Constitutionalism
- 6 Constitutions as Symbolic Orders
- 7 The Rule of the Market
- Part III Constitutional Law and Transnational Society
- Index
- References
4 - Constitutionalism between Nation States and Global Law
from Part II - Constitutional Sociology between the National and the Transnational
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 October 2017
Book contents
- Sociological Constitutionalism
- Sociological Constitutionalism
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Sociological Constitutionalism
- Part I National Constitutions and Sociological Method
- Part II Constitutional Sociology between the National and the Transnational
- 4 Constitutionalism between Nation States and Global Law
- 5 Politics and the Political in Sociological Constitutionalism
- 6 Constitutions as Symbolic Orders
- 7 The Rule of the Market
- Part III Constitutional Law and Transnational Society
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Sociological Constitutionalism , pp. 135 - 177Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Ackerman, Bruce (1991), We the People, Vol I: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Albertin, Lothar (1974), ‘Faktoren eines Arrangements zwischen industriellem und politischem System in der Weimarer Republik’, in Mommsen, Hans, Petzina, Dietmar and Weisbrod, Bernd (eds), Industrielles System und politische Entwicklung in der Weimarer Republik. Düsseldorf: Droste, pp. 658–74.Google Scholar
Austin, John (1995 [1832]), The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, edited by Rumble, W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baily, Samuel L. (1967), Labor, Nationalism, and Politics in Argentina. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard (1996), Nation-Building and Citizenship. Studies of Our Changing Social Order, new and enlarged edition. New Brunswick: Transaction Press.Google Scholar
Berman, Paul Schiff (2007), ‘A Pluralist Approach to International Law’. Yale Law Journal 32: 300–329.Google Scholar
Böhret, Carl (1966), Aktionen gegen die kalte Sozialisierung 1926–1930. Ein Beitrag zum Wirken ökonomischer Einflußverbände in der Weimarer Republik. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.Google Scholar
Branch, Daniel, and Cheeseman, Nicholas (2006), ‘The Politics of Control in Kenya: Understanding the Bureaucratic-Executive State, 1952–78.’ Review of African Political Economy 33: 11–31.Google Scholar
Brysk, Alison (1994), The Politics of Human Rights in Argentina. Protest, Change, and Democratization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Maxwell (2013), Strong Constitutions: Social-Cognitive Origins of the Separation of Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caramani, Daniele (2004), The Nationalization of Politics. The Formation of National Electorates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Caruso, Daniela (2006), ‘Private Law and State-Making in the Age of Globalization.’ New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 39(1): 1–74.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and Collier, David (1991), Shaping the Political Arena. Critical Junctures, The Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, Maria Lorena (2007), The Politics of Labor Reform in Latin America. Between Flexibility and Rights. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Costa Pinto, António (2011), ‘Ruling Elites, Political Institutions and Decision-Making in Fascist-Era Dictatorships: Comparative Perspectives’ in Pinto, António Costa (ed.), Rethinking the Nature of Fascism. Comparative Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 197–226.Google Scholar
Church, Clive (1981), Revolution and Red Tape. The French Ministerial Bureaucracy 1770–1850. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Epstein, Edward C. (1989), ‘Labor, Populism and Hegemonic Crisis in Argentina’ in Epstein, Edward C. (ed.), Labor Autonomy and the State in Latin America. Boston: Unwin Hyman, pp. 13–38.Google Scholar
Fasoli, Gina, and Sella, Pietro (eds) (1937), Statuti di Bologna dell’anno 1288, in 2 vols. Vatican: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana.Google Scholar
Fassbender, Bardo (1998), ‘The United Nations Charter as Constitution of the International Community.’ Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 36(3): 539–619.Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, Andreas (2003), ‘Die Emergenz der Globalverfassung.’ Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 63: 717–760.Google Scholar
García, Antonio (1966), ‘Los sindicatos en el esquema de revolución nacional: El sindicalismo en la experiencia boliviana de nacionalización y desarrolo.’ El triestre económico 33(132(4)): 597–629.Google Scholar
Garon, Sheldon (1987), The State and Labor in Modern Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gaudio, Ricardo, and Domeniconi, Héctor (1986), ‘Las primeras elecciones sindicales en la transición democrática.’ Desarrollo Económico 26(103): 423–454.Google Scholar
Gierke, Otto (1873), Das deutsche Genossenschaftsrecht, vol. II: Geschichte des deutschen Körperschaftsbegriffs. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Gironda, Vito Francesco (2010), Die Politik der Staatsbürgerschaft. Italien und Deutschland im Vergleich 1800–1914. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Gloria, Andrea (ed.) (1873), Statuti del Comune di Padova del secolo XII all’anno 1285. Padua: Sacchetta.Google Scholar
Gosewinkel, Dieter (2001), Einbürgern und Ausschließen. Die Nationalisierung der Staatsangehörigkeit vom Deutschen Bund bis zur Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Grimm, Dieter (2005), ‘The Constitution in the Process of Denationalization.’ Constellations 12 (2005): 447–463.Google Scholar
Grimm, Dieter (2009), ‘Gesellschaftlicher Konstitutionalismus – Eine Kompensation für den Bedutungssschwund der Staatsverfassung?’ in Herdegen, Matthias, Klein, Hans Hugo, Papier, Hans-Jürgen and Scholz, Rupert (eds), Staatsrecht und Politik. Festschrift für Roman Herzog zum 75. Geburtstag. Munich: Beck, pp. 67–81.Google Scholar
Grübler, Michael (1982), Die Spitzenverbände der Wirtschaft und das erste Kabinett Brüning: Vom Ende der Großen Koalition 1929/30 bis zum Vorabend der Bankenkrise 1931. Düsseldorf: Droste.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1992), Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hamann, Andrea and Fabri, Hélène Ruiz (2008), ‘Transnational Networks and Constitutionalism.’ International Journal of Constitutional Law 6(3–4): 481–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, James C. (2005), The Rights of Refugees in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heller, Hermann (1971), Sozialismus und Nation, in Heller, , Gesammelte Schriften, Vol. I edited by Drath, Martin, in 3 vols. Leiden: Sijthoff, pp. 439–526.Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen (1995), Passions and Constraint. On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Jessup, Philip C. (1959), The Use of International Law. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Law School.Google Scholar
Joerges, Christian (2014), ‘Legitimacy without Democracy in the EU? Perspectives on the Constitutionalization of Europe through Law’ in Maduro, Miguel, Tuori, Kaarlo and Sankari, Suvi (eds), Transnational Law: Rethinking European Law and Legal Thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 248–68.Google Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers (1982), MITI and the Japanese Miracle. The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975. Berkeley: California University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, Paul W. (1997), The Reign of Law. Marbury v. Madison and the Construction of America. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kanalan, Ibrahim (2014), Die universelle Durchsetzung des Rechts auf Nahrung gegen transnationale Unternehmen. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Kjaer, Poul (2014), ‘Toward a Sociology of Intermediary Institutions: The Role of Law in Corporatism, Neo-Corporatism, and Governance’ in Madsen, Mikael Rask and Thornhill, Chris (eds), Law and the Formation of Modern Europe. Perspectives from the Historical Sociology of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 117–141.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, Peters, Anne and Ulfstein, Geir (2009), The Constitutionalization of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuo, Ming-Sung (2010), ‘The End of Constitutionalism As We Know It? Boundaries and the State of Global Constitutional (Dis)ordering’. Transnational Legal Theory 1(3): 329–369.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch (1950), International Law and Human Rights. London: Steven & Sons.Google Scholar
Leibholz, Gerhard (1957), ‘Einleitung: Der Status des Bundesverfassungsgerichts.’ Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts, Neue Folge 6: 110–221.Google Scholar
Luebbert, Gregory M. (1987), ‘Social Foundations of Political Order in Interwar Europe’. World Politics 39(4): 449–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1984), ‘Widerstandsrecht und politische Gewalt’. Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 5(1): 36–45.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1997), Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Lutz, Ellen L. and Sikkink, Kathryn (2000), ‘International Human Rights Law and Practice in Latin America.’ International-Organization 54(3): 633–659.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl 1958–1968 [1844]. Zur Judenfragein Marx, and Engels, , Werke, in 43 vols. Berlin: Dietz, Vol. I pp. 347–377.Google Scholar
Mellis, Guido (1988), Due modelli di amministrazione tra liberalismo e fascismo. Burocrazie tradizionali e nuovi apparati. Rome: Ministro per i beni culturali.Google Scholar
Mittermaier, C. J. A. (1841), Die Strafrechtsgesetzgebung in ihrer Fortbildung geprüft, I. Heidelberg: Karl Winter.Google Scholar
Morgan, Kenneth O. (1979). Consensus and Disunity. The Lloyd George Coalition Government 1918–1922. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Munck, Gerardo L. (1998), Authoritarianism and Democratization. Soldiers and Workers in Argentina, 1976–1983. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Murillo, M. Victoria (1997), ‘La adaptación del sindicalismo argentino a las reformas de Mercado en la primera presidencia de Menem.’ Desarrolo Económico 37(147): 419–446.Google Scholar
Nautz, Jürgen P. (1985), Die Durchsetzung der Tarifautonomie in Westdeutschland. Das Tarifvertragsgesetz vom 9. April 1949. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Nino, Carlos Santiago (1989), ‘Transition to Democracy, Corporatism and Constitutional Reform in Latin America.’ University of Miami Law Review 44: 129–164.Google Scholar
Ohler, Christoph (2015), ‘Die Rückkehr in die internationale Gemeinschaft. Das Bundesverfassungsgericht als Türhüter des offenen Staates’ in Fischer, Christian and Pauly, Walter (eds), Höchstrichterliche Rechtsprechung in der frühen Bundesrepublik. Tübingen: Mohr, pp. 27–42.Google Scholar
Parlamentarischer Rat (1949), Verhandlungen des Hauptausschusses 1948/49. Scheur: Bonner Universitäts-Buchdruckerei Gebr.Google Scholar
Patroni, Viviana (2001), ‘The Decline and Fall of Corporatism? Labour Legislation Reform in Mexico and Argentina during the 1990s.’ Canadian Journal of Political Science 34(2): 249–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peruzzotti, Enrique (2001), ‘The Nature of the New Argentine Democracy. The Delegative Democracy Argument Revisited.’ Journal of Latin American Studies 33(1): 133–155Google Scholar
Peters, Anne (2014), Jenseits der Menschenrechte. Die Rechtsstellung des Individuums im Völkerrecht. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Rabkin, Jeremy A. (2007), Law without Nations? Why Constitutional Government Requires Sovereign States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ranis, Peter (1992), Argentine Workers. Peronism and Contemporary Class Consciousness. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Rebentisch, Dieter (1989), Führerstaat und Verwaltung im Zweiten Weltkrieg. Verfassungsentwicklung und Verwaltungspolitik 1939–1945. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Reinisch, August (2007), ‘The Immunity of International Organizations and the Jurisdiction of their Administrative Tribunals.’ Chinese Journal of International Law 7(2): 285–306.Google Scholar
Remmer, Karen L. (1989), ‘Neopatrimonialism: The Politics of Military Rule in Chile, 1973–1987.’ Comparative Politics 21(2): 149–170.Google Scholar
Renner, Moritz (2009) ‘Towards a Hierarchy of Norms in Transnational Law?’ Journal of International Arbitration 26(4): 533–555.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1975[1762]), Du contrat social et autres oeuvres politiques. Paris: Garnier.Google Scholar
Rütten, Wilhelm (1996), ‘Gewerkschaften und Arbeitsrecht nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg (1945–1950/52)’ in Diestelkamp, Bernhard, Kitagawa, Zentarô, Kreiner, Josef, Murakami, Junichi, Nörr, Knut Wolfgang and Toshitani, Nobuyoshi (eds), Zwischen Kontinuität und Fremdbestimmung. Zum Einfluß der Besatzungsmächte auf die deutsche und japanische Rechtsordnung 1945 bis 1950. Tübingen: Mohr, pp. 149–166.Google Scholar
Sangmpam, S. N. (1993), ‘Neither Soft nor Dead: The African State Is Alive and Well.’ African Studies Review 36(2): 73–94.Google Scholar
Savigny, Friedrich Carl von (1840a[1814]), Vom Beruf unserer Zeit für Gesetzgebung. Heidelberg: J.C.B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Savigny, Friedrich Carl von (1840b), System des heutigen Römischen Rechts, vol. I, in 9 vols. Berlin: Veit und Comp.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl (1940 [1939]), ‘Über die zwei großen, Dualismen’ des heutigen Rechtssystems’ in Schmitt, Carl, Positionen und Begriffe im Kampf mit Weimar-Genf-Versailles. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 261–271.Google Scholar
Scholz, Rupert (1978), Pressefreiheit und Arbeitsverfassung. Verfassungsprobleme um Tendenzschutz und innere Pressefreiheit. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.Google Scholar
Schorkopf, Frank (2010), ‘Völkerrechtsfreundlichkeit und Völkerrechtsskepsis in der Rechtsprechung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts’ in Giegerich, Thomas (ed.), Der offene Verfassungsstaat des Grundgesetzes. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 131–158.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory (2012), ‘Transnational Process and State Change.’ Law & Social Inquiry 37(2): 229–264.Google Scholar
Shaw, Timothy (1982), ‘Beyond Neo-Colonialism: Varieties of Corporatism in Africa.’ The Journal of Modern African Studies 20(2): 239–261.Google Scholar
Sewell, William Hamilton (2008), Work and Revolution in France: The Language of Labor from the Old Regime to 1848. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sieyès, Emmanuel Joseph (1789b), Préliminaire de la constitution: Reconnaissance et exposition raisonnée des droits de l’homme & du citoyen. Versailles: Ph.-D. Pierres.Google Scholar
Sonenscher, Michael (1989), Work and Wages. Natural Law, Politics and the Eighteenth-Century French Trades. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang, and Schmitter, Philippe C. (1985), ‘Community, Market, State—and Associations? The Prospective Contribution of Interest Governance to Social Order.’ European Sociological Review 1(2): 119–138.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther (2012), Constitutional Fragments. Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thornhill, Chris (2011), A Sociology of Constitutions. Constitutions and State Legitimacy in Historical-Sociological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thornhill, Chris (2016), A Sociology of Transnational Constitutions. Social Foundations of the Post-National Legal Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, Tudor Thomas (1983 [1784]), ‘Conciliatory Hints, Attempting, by a Fair State of Matters, to Remove Party Prejudice’ in Hyneman, C. S. and Lutz, D. S. (eds), American Political writing during the founding era 1760–1805, edited in 2 vols. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, I, pp. 606–630.Google Scholar
Turgot, Anne-Robert-Jacques (1787[1775]), ‘Mémoire sur les Municipalités’, in Turgot, , Oeuvres Posthumes. Lausanne: n.p., pp. 1–181.Google Scholar
Unger, Moritz von (2008), Menschenrechte als transnationales Privatrecht. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot.Google Scholar
Verdross, Alfred (1926), Die Verfassung der Völkerrechtsgemeinschaft. Vienna: Springer.Google Scholar
Vorländer, Hans (2006), ‘Deutungsmacht – Die Macht der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit’ in Vorländer, Hans (ed.), Die Deutungsmacht der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 9–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahl, Rainer (2011) ‘Die Rolle staatlicher Verfassungen angesichts der Europäisierung und der Internationalisierung’ in Vesting, Thomas and Korioth, Stefan (eds), Der Eigenwert der Verfassungsgeschichte. Was bleibt von der Verfassung nach der Globalisierung? Tübingen: Mohr, pp. 355–378.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1921/22) Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriß der verstehenden Soziologie. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H. H. (1991), ‘The Transformation of Europe.’ Yale Law Journal 100: 2404–2483.Google Scholar
Wienfort, Monika 2001. Patrimonialgerichte in Preussen. Ländliche Gesellschaft und bürgerliches Recht 1770–1848/49. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Wylde, Christopher (2011), ‘State, Society and Markets in Argentina: The Political Economy of Neodesarollismo under Néstor Kirchner, 2003–2007.’ Bulletin of Latin American Research 30(4): 436–452.Google Scholar
Young, Ernest A. (2003), ‘The Trouble with Global Constitutionalism.’ Texas International Law Journal 38: 527–546.Google Scholar
Zumbansen, Peer (2001), ‘Vergangene Zukunft des Völkerrechts.’ Kritische Justiz 34(1): 46–68.Google Scholar
Zumbansen, Peer (2010), ‘Transnational Legal Pluralism.’ Transnational Legal Theory 1(2): 141–189.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by