Ackerman, Bruce (1991). We the People 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce (1997). ‘The Rise of World Constitutionalism’, Virginia Law Review 83, pp. 771–797.Google Scholar

Adams, Willi Paul (1980). The First Americans Constitutions: Republican Ideology and the Making of the State Constitutions in the Revolutionary Era. Chapel Hill: University of Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Adorno, Theodor W. (2003). ‘Individuum und Organisation: Einleitungsvortag zum Darmstädter Gespräch 1953’, in Adorno, T. W., Gesammelte Schriften, Vol. 8, Soziologische Schriften 1. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 440–456.Google Scholar

Amann, Diane Marie (2004). ‘Guantánamo’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 42, pp. 263–348.Google Scholar

Anderson, Gavin W. (2013). ‘Societal Constitutionalism, Social Movements, and Constitutionalism from Below’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20, pp. 881–906.Google Scholar

Aristotle, (1944). Politics. With an English translation by Rackham, H.. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Arlt, Herbert (2002). ‘Konzeptuelle Metaphern und gesellschaftliche Prozesse’, TRANS. Internet-Zeitschrift für Kulturwissenschaften 13, September 2002 (http://www.inst.at/trans/13Nr/arlt13.htm).Google Scholar

Backer, Larry Catá (2013). ‘Transnational Corporations’ Outward Expression of Inward Self-Constitution: The Enforcement of Human Rights by Apple, Inc.’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20, pp. 805–879.Google Scholar

Ball, Terence and Pocock, J. G. A. (1988). ‘Introduction’, in Ball, T. and Pocock, J. G. A. (eds), Conceptual Change and Constitution. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar

Saki, Bailey and Mattei, Ugo (2013). ‘Social Movements as Constituent Power: The Italian Struggle for the Commons’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20, pp. 965–1013.Google Scholar

Baxi, Upendra (2005). ‘Postcolonial Legality’, in Schwarz, H. and Ray, S. (eds), A Companion to Postcolonial Studies. Malden, MA/Oxford/Victoria: Blackwell, pp. 540–555.Google Scholar

Benvindo, Juliano Zaiden (2015). ‘The Seeds of Change: Popular Protests as Constitutional Moments’, Marquette Law Review 99 (2), pp. 363–426.Google Scholar

Berman, Paul Schiff (2013). ‘Jurisgenerative Constitutionalism: Procedural Principles for Managing Global Legal Pluralism’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20, pp.665–695.Google Scholar

Biaggini, Giovanni (2000). ‘Die Idee der Verfassung – Neuausrichtung im Zeitalter der Globalisierung?’, Zeitschrift für Schweizerisches Recht 141 (119 in the new series), pp. 445–476.Google Scholar

Blumenberg, Hans (1998). Paradigmen zu einer Methaphorologie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Bobbio, Norberto (1996). The Age of Rights, Engl. trans. by Cameron, A.. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang (1983). ‘Geschichtliche Entwicklung und Bedeutungswandel der Verfassung’, in Buschmann, A., Otte, G., Schubert, W., and Knemeyer, F.- L. (eds), Festschrift für Rudolf Gmür. Bielefeld: Gieseking, pp. 7–19.Google Scholar

Brasil, Comissão Nacional da Verdade (2014). Relatório, Vol. 1. Brasília: CNV.Google Scholar

Bregvadze, Lasha (2013). ‘Constituting Constitutions beyond the State: Polycontextural Constitutionalism of the World Society’, in Febbrajo, A. and Harste, G. (eds), Law and Intersystemic Communication: Understanding ‘Structural Coupling’. Surrey, UK/Burlington, VT: Ashgate, pp. 327–341.Google Scholar

Brunkhorst, Hauke (1999). ‘Heterarchie und Demokratie’, in Brunkhorst, H. and Niesen, P. (eds), Das Recht der Republik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 373–385.Google Scholar

Brunkhorst, Hauke (2012). Legitimationskrisen: Verfassungsprobleme der Weltgesellschaft. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar

Brunkhorst, Hauke (2014). Critical Theory of Legal Revolutions: Evolutionary Perspectives. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Butler, Judith (1997). ‘Subjection, Resistance, Resignification: Between Freud and Foucault’, in Butler, J., The Physic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 83–105.Google Scholar

Canotilho, J. J. Gomes (1991). Direito constitucional, 5th edn. Coimbra: Almedina.Google Scholar

Canotilho, J. J. Gomes (2006). ‘Brancosos’ e interconstitucionalidade: Itinerários dos discursos sobre a historicidade constitucional. Coimbra: Almedina.Google Scholar

Castellà Andreu, Josep Maria (2015). ‘La propuesta de secesión catalana: entre la consulta popular y los problemas de constitucionalidad’, Revista de Derecho Público 82, pp. 13–39.Google Scholar

Chia, Eduardo A. and Quezada, Flavio (eds) (2015). Propuesta para una Nueva Constitución (Originada en Democarcia). Santiago: Instituto igualdad/Facultad de Derecho Universidad de Chile/Friedrich Ebert-Stiftung.Google Scholar

Christodoulidis, Emilios (2013). ‘On the Politics of Societal Constitutionalism’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20(2), pp. 629–663.Google Scholar

Cicero, Marcus Tullius (1928). De Re Publica, De Legibus, with an English translation by Keyes, C. W.. London: William Heinemann/New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons [De Re Publica, pp. 12–285].Google Scholar

Copi, Irving M. (1961). Introduction to Logic, 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Corrêa, Marcos Sá (1977). 1964 visto e comentado pela Casa Branca. Porto Alegre: L. & PM.Google Scholar

Correa Sutil, Sofía (2015). ‘Los Procesos Constituyentes en la Historia de Chile: Lecciones para el Presente’, Estudios Públicos 137, pp. 53–85.Google Scholar

Dicey, A. V. (1982). Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics [reprint of the 8th edn., London: Macmillan, 1915].Google Scholar

Dupuy, Pierre-Marie (1997). ‘The Constitutional Dimension of the Charter of the United Nations Revisited’, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 1, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar

Eisenstadt, S. N. (2000). Die Vielfalt der Moderne, German trans. by Schluchter, B.. Frankfurt am Main: Velbrück.Google Scholar

Ellis, Jaye (2013). ‘Constitutionalization of Nongovernmental Certification Programs’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20, pp. 1035–1059.Google Scholar

Fassbender, Bardo (1998). ‘The United Nations Charter as Constitution of the International Community’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 36, pp. 529–619.Google Scholar

Fassbender, Bardo (2007) ‘“We the Peoples of the United Nations’: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form in International Law’, in Loughlin, M. and Walker, N. (eds), The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 269–290.Google Scholar

Feierman, Steven (2003). ‘African Histories and the Dissolution of World History’, in Bates, R. H., Mudimbe, V. Y. and O’Barr, J. (eds), Africa and the Disciplines: The Contributions of Research in Africa to the Social Sciences and Humanities. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 167–212.Google Scholar

Ferrajoli, Luigi (1997). La sovranità nel mondo moderno. Nascita e crisi dello Stato nazionale. Rome/Bari: Editori Laterza.Google Scholar

Feyerabend, Paul K. (1991). Three Dialogues on Knowledge. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, Andreas (2005). Globalverfassung: Die Geltungsbegründung der Menschenrechte. Weilerswist: Velbrück.Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, Andreas (2013). ‘Systemtheorie als kritische Gesellschaftstheorie’, in Fischer-Lescano, A. (ed.), Kritische Systemtheorie: Zur Evolution einer normativen Theorie. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, pp. 13–39.Google Scholar

Frowein, Jochen A. (2000). ‘Konstitutionalisierung des Völkerrechts’, in Völkerrecht und Internationales Recht in einem sich globalisierenden internationalen System – Auswirkung der Entstaatlichung transnationaler Rechtsbeziehungen (Berichte der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Völkerrecht 39). Heidelberg: Müller, pp. 427–445.Google Scholar

Gauchet, Marcel (1989). La Révolution des droits de l’homme. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Giergerich, Thomas (2003). ‘Einführung: Transnationale Konstitutionalisierung als Antwort auf die Globalisierung’, in Giegerich, T., Europäische Verfassung und deutsche Verfassung im transnationalen Konstitutionalisierungsprozess: Wechselseitige Rezeption, konstitutionelle Evolution und föderale Verflechtung. Berlin: Springer, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar

Grimm, Dieter (1989). ‘Verfassung’, in Görres-Gesellschaft, (ed.), Staatslexikon: Recht • Wirtschaft • Gesellschaft, 7th edn. Freiburg/Basle/Vienna: Herder), Vol. V, columns 633–643.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen (1982). Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns, 2nd ed. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, Vol. 2 [Engl. trans. (1987): The Theory of Communicative Action. Boston: Beacon Press, Vol. 2].Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen (1990). ‘Vorwort zur Neuauflage 1990’, in Habermas, J., Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 11–53.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen (1992a). ‘Volkssouveränität als Verfahren (1988)’, in Habermas, J., Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp 600–31 [Engl. trans. (1997): ‘Popular Sovereignty as Procedure’, in Bohman, J. and Rehg, W. (eds), Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press, pp. 35–65.]Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen (1992b), ‘Recht und Moral (Tanner Lectures 1986)’, in Habermas, J., Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 541–599 [Engl. trans. (1988): ‘Law and Morality’ (The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, delivered at Harvard University, 1 and 2 Oct. 1986), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Vol. 8. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, pp. 217–279].Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen (1996). ‘Kants Idee des ewigen Friedens – aus dem historischen Abstand von 200 Jahren’, in Habermas, J. (ed.) Die Einbeziehung des Anderen: Studien zur politischen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 192–236.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen (1998a). Die postnationale Konstellation: Politische Essays. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp [Engl. trans. (2001): Post-National Constellation: Political Essays. Cambridge: Polity Press/Oxford: Blackwell].Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen (1998b). ‘Jenseits des Nationalstaats? Bemerkungen zu Folgeproblemen der wirtschaftlichen Globalisierung’, in Beck, U. (ed.), Politik der Globalisierung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 67–84.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen (2000). ‘Bestialität und Humanität: Ein Krieg an der Grenze zwischen Recht und Moral’, in Merkel, R. (ed.), Der Kosovo-Krieg und das Völkerrecht. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 51–65.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen (2001). ‘Braucht Europa eine Verfassung?’, in Habermas, J. (ed.) Zeit der Übergänge: Kleine Politische Schriften IX Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 104–129.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen (2004). ‘Hat die Konstitutionalisierung des Völkerrechts noch eine Chance?’, in Habermas, J. (ed.) Der gespaltene Westen: Kleine Politische Schriften X. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 113–193.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen (2005). ‘Eine politische Verfassung für die pluralistische Weltgesellschaft?’, in Habermas, J. (ed.) Zwischen Naturismus und Religion: Philosophische Aufsätze. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 324–365 [Engl. trans.: “A Political Constitution for the Pluralist World Society?”. In: Habermas, J., Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge, UK/Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2008, pp. 312–52].Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen (2007). ‘Kommunikative Rationalität und grenzüberschreitende Politik: eine Replik’, in Niesen, P. and Herborth, B. (eds), Anarchie der kommunikativen Freiheit: Jürgen Habermas und die Theorie der internationalen Politik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 406–459.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen (2011). Zur Verfassung Europas: Ein Essay. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Hespanha, António Manuel (2004). Guiando a mão invisível: direito, Estado e lei no liberalismo monárquico português. Coimbra: Almedina.Google Scholar

Hesse, Konrad (1980). Grundzüge des Verfassungsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, 12^th edn. Heidelberg/Karlsruhe: Müller.Google Scholar

Hillgenberg, Hartmut (2005). ‘Incommunicado in Guantanamo’, in Bröhmer, J., Bieber, R., and Callies, C. (eds), Internationale Gemeinschaft und Menschenrechte: Festschrift für Georg Ress zum 70. Geburtstag am 21. Januar 2005. Cologne/Berlin/Munich: Heymanns, pp. 133–140.Google Scholar

Hollerbach, Alexander (1969). ‘Ideologie und Verfassung’, in Maihofer, W. (ed.), Ideologie und Recht. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, pp. 37–61.Google Scholar

Holmes, Pablo (2013). Verfassungsrevolution in der Weltgesellschaft: Differenzierungsprobleme des Rechts und der Politik im Zeitalter der Global Governance. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar

Jinks, Derek and Sloss, David (2004). ‘Is the President Bound by the Geneva Conventions’, Cornell Law Review 90, pp. 97–202.Google Scholar

Kadelbach, Stefan and Kleinlein, Thomas (2008). ‘International Law – a Constitution for Mankind? An Attempt at a Re-appraisal with an Analysis of Constitutional Principles’, German Yearbook of International Law 50, pp. 303–347.Google Scholar

Kjaer, Paul F. (2013). ‘Transnational Normative Orders: The Constitutionalism of Infra- and Trans-Normative Law’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20, pp. 777–803.Google Scholar

Kjaer, Paul F. (2014). Constitutionalism in the Global Realm: A Sociological Approach. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Klug, Heinz (2000). ‘Model and Anti-Model: The United States Constitution and the “Rise of World Constitutionalism”’, Wisconsin Law Review 2000, pp. 597–616.Google Scholar

Koselleck, Reinhart (1989). Vergangene Zukunft: Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp [Engl. trans. (2004): Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. New York: Columbia University Press].Google Scholar

Koselleck, Reinhart (2006). ‘Begriffsgeschichtliche Probleme der Verfassungsgeschichtsbeschreibung’, in Koselleck, R.. Begriffsgeschichten. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 365–401.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti (1995). ‘The Police in the Temple – Order, Justice and the UN: A Dialectical View’, European Journal of International Law 6, pp. 325–348.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti (2002). The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti (2004) ‘International Law and Hegemony: A Reconfiguration’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 17, pp. 197–218.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti (2010). ‘Human Rights Mainstreaming as a Strategy for Institutional Power’, Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development 1, pp. 47–58.Google Scholar

Krisch, Nico (2010). Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kumm, Mattias (2013). ‘The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: An Integrated Conception of Public Law’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20, pp. 605–628.Google Scholar

Laclau, Ernesto (1994). ‘Why do Empty Signifiers Matter to Politics?’, in Weeks, J. (ed.), The Lesser Evil and the Greater Good. The Theory and Politics of Social Diversity. London: Rivers Oram Press, pp. 167–178Google Scholar

Ladeur, Karl-Heinz (1992). Postmoderne Rechtstheorie: Selbstreferenz – Selbstorganisation – Prozeduralisierung. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.Google Scholar

Ladeur, Karl-Heinz (2014). ‘Die transsubjektive Dimension der Grundrechte’, in Vesting, T., Korioth, S. and Augsberg, I., Grundrechte als Phänomene kollektiver Ordnung. Tübingen: Mohr, pp. 17–38.Google Scholar

Lefort, Claude (1981). ‘Droit de l’homme et politique’, in Lefort, C., L’invention démocratique: Les limites de la domination totalitaire. Paris: Fayard, pp. 45–83.Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, Claude (1973). ‘Introduction a l’œuvre de Marcel Mauss’, in Mauss, M, Sociologie et Anthropologie. 5th edn. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, Vol. I, pp. IX–LII [1st edn. 1950].Google Scholar

Lindahl, Hans (2010). Fault Lines of Globalization: Legal Order and the Politics of A-Legality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lindahl, Hans (2013). ‘We and Cyberlaw: The Spatial Unity of Constitutional Orders’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20, pp. 697–730.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas (1965). Grundrechte als Institution: Ein Beitrag zur politischen Soziologie. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas (1973). ‘Politische Verfassungen im Kontext des Gesellschaftssystems’, Der Staat 12, pp. 1–22 and 165–182.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas (1980). ‘Gesellschaftliche Struktur und semantische Tradition’, in Luhmann, N., Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik, Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, Vol. 1, pp. 9–71.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas (1981a). Ausdifferenzierung des Rechts: Beiträge zur Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas (1981b). ‘Machtkreislauf und Recht in Demokratien’, Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 2, pp. 158–167.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas (1981c). Politische Theorie im Wohlfahrtsstaat. Munich: Olzog.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas (1983). Legitimation durch Verfahren. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas (1984). Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp [Engl. trans. (1995): Social Systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press].Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas (1986). ‘Die Codierung des Rechtssystems’, Rechtstheorie 17, pp. 171–203.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas (1987a). Rechtssoziologie, 3rd edn. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. [Engl. trans. (2014): A Sociological Theory of Law. 2nd edn. Abingdon, UK/New York: Routledge].Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas (1987b) ‘Die Zukunft der Demokratie’, in Luhmann, N., Soziologische Aufklärung 4: Beiträge zur funktionalen Differenzierung der Gesellschaft. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 126–132Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas (1990a). ‘Verfassung als evolutionäre Errungenschaft’, Rechtshistorisches Journal 9, pp. 176–220.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas (1990b). ‘Ich sehe was, was Du nicht siehst’, in Luhmann, N., Soziologische Aufklärung 5: Konstruktivistische Perspektiven. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 228–234 [Engl. trans. (2002): ‘I See Something You Don’t See’, in Luhmann, N., Theories of Distinction: Redescribing the Descriptions of Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 187–193].Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas (1993). Das Recht der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp [Engl. trans. (2004): Law as a Social System. Oxford: Oxford University Press].Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas (1995). ‘Die Form “Person”’, in Luhmann, N., Soziologische Aufklärung 6: Die Soziologie und der Mensch. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 142–154.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas (1997). Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2 tomes [Engl. trans.: Theory of Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press, Vol. 1 (2012), Vol. 2 (2013)].Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas (2000). Die Politik der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

MacDowell, Douglas M. (1989). ‘The Oikos in Athenian Law’, The Classical Quarterly (New Series) 39, pp. 10–21.Google Scholar

Maddox, Graham (1989). ‘Constitution’, in Ball, T., Farr, J. and Hanson, R. L. (eds), Political Innovation and Conceptual Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 50–67.Google Scholar

Madison, James, Hamilton, Alexander, and Jay, John (1987). The Federalist Papers (1788). London/New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Maduro, Miguel Poiares (2006). A Constituição plural: constitucionalismo e União Européia. Cascais: Principia.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl (1988). ‘Zur Judenfrage’, in Marx, K. and Engels, F., Werke. 15th edn. Berlin: Dietz Verlag, Vol. I, pp. 347–377 [first published in: Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher. Paris, 1844].Google Scholar

Maus, Ingeborg (1997). ‘Staatssouveränität als Volkssouveränität. Überlegungen zum Friedensprojekt Immanuel Kants’, in Loth, W. (ed.), Jahrbuch 1996 des Kulturwissenschaftlichen Instituts im Wissenschaftszentrum NRW. Essen: Altes Rathaus, pp. 167–194.Google Scholar

Maus, Ingeborg (2011). ‘Vom Nationalstaat zum Globalstaat oder: der Verlust der Demokratie’, in Maus, I. (ed.), Über Volkssouveränität: Elemente einer Demokratietheorie. Berlin: Suhrkamp, pp. 375–406.Google Scholar

Maus, Ingeborg (2015). ‘Verfassung und Verfassunggebung. Zur Kritik des Theorems einer “Emergenz” supranationaler und transnationaler Verfassungen’, in Maus, I. (ed.), Menschenrechte, Demokratie und Frieden: Perspektiven globaler Organisation. Berlin: Suhrkamp, pp. 122–191.Google Scholar

McIlwain, Charles Howard (1940). Constitutionalism Ancient and Modern. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Mello, Celso de Albuquerque (2000). Direito constitucional internacional – Introdução, 2nd edn. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar.Google Scholar

Mignot, Dominique-Aimé (2007). ‘La matrice romaine de l’Édit de Mars 1865, dit le Code Noir’, in Niort, Jean-François (ed.), Du Code Noir au Code Civil: Jalons pour l’histoire du droit en Guadeloupe. Perspectives comparées avec Martinique, la Guyane et la République d’Haïti. Paris: L’Harmattan, pp. 87–98.Google Scholar

Mohnhaupt, Heinz (1995). ‘Konstitution, Status, Leges fundamentals von der Antike bis zur Aufklärung’, in Mohnhaupt, H. and Grimm, D. (eds), Verfassung: Zur Geschichte des Begriffs von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart; zwei Studien. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, pp. 1–99.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, (1979). De l’Esprit des Lois. Paris: Garnier-Flammarion, Vol. I [1st edn. 1748].Google Scholar

Müller, Friedrich (1997). Wer ist das Volk? Die Grundfrage der Demokratie – Elemente einer Verfassungstheorie VI. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.Google Scholar

Neves, Marcelo (1992). Verfassung und Positivität des Rechts in der peripheren Moderne: Eine theoretische Betrachtung und eine Interpretation des Falls Brasilien. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.Google Scholar

Neves, Marcelo (1998). Symbolische Konstitutionalisierung. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.Google Scholar

Neves, Marcelo (2000). Zwischen Themis und Leviathan: Eine Schwierige Beziehung – Eine Rekonstruktion des demokratischen Rechtsstaats in Auseinandersetzung mit Luhmann und Habermas. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar

Neves, Marcelo (2005). ‘Between Under-Integration and Over-Integration: Not Taking Citizenship Rights Seriously’, in Souza, J. and Sinder, V. (eds), Imagining Brazil. Lanham, Md: Lexington Books, pp. 61–90.Google Scholar

Neves, Marcelo (2007). ‘The symbolic force of human rights’, Philosophy & Social Criticism 33(4), pp. 411–444.Google Scholar

Neves, Marcelo (2013). Transconstitutionalism. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar

Ochoa, Christiana and Greene, Shane (2001). ‘Introduction: Human Rights and Legal Systems Across the Global South’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 18, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar

Paine, Thomas (1992). Rights of Man [1791–1792], Claeys, G. (ed.). Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar

Peters, Anne (2006). ‘Compensatory Constitutionalism: The Function and Potential of Fundamental International Norms and Structures’, Leiden Journal of International Law 19, pp. 579–510.Google Scholar

Pires, Francisco Lucas (1997). Introdução ao direito constitucional europeu (seu sentido, problemas e limites). Coimbra: Almedina.Google Scholar

Prandini, Riccardo (2013). ‘The Future of Societal Constitutionalism in the Age of Acceleration’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20, pp. 731–776.Google Scholar

Preuss, Ulrich (1990). Revolution, Fortschrift und Verfassung: Zu einem neuen Verfassungsverständnis. Berlin: Wagenbach.Google Scholar

Preuss, Ulrich (2007). ‘The Exercise of Constituent Power in Central and Eastern Europe’, in Loughlin, M. and Walker, N. (eds), The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 211–228.Google Scholar

Rajagopal, Balakrishnan (2012). ‘International Law and Its Discontents: Rethinking the Global South’, American Society of International Law Proceedings 106, pp. 176–181.Google Scholar

Renner, Moritz (2013). ‘Occupy the System! Societal Constitutionalism and Transnational Corporate Accounting’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20, pp. 941–964.Google Scholar

Renwick, Alan (2014). After the Referendum: Options for a Constitutional Convention. London: The Constitution Society.Google Scholar

Richard, Jérémy (2010). ‘Du Code Noir de 1685 au Projet de 1829: de la semi-réification à l’humanisation de l’esclave noir’, in le Marc’Hadour, T. and Carius, M. (eds), Esclavage et droit: du Code noir à nos jours. Arras: Artois Presses Université, pp. 53–90.Google Scholar

Roach, Kent (2006). ‘The Post-9/11 Migration of Britain’s Terrorism Act 2000’, in Choudhry, S. (ed.), The Migration of Constitutional Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 374–402.Google Scholar

Roberts, John (ed.) (2007). Oxford Dictionary of the Classical World. Oxford: Oxford University Press (online).Google Scholar

Rödl, Florian (2013). ‘Fundamental Rights, Private Law, and Societal Constitution: On the Logic of the So-Called Horizontal Effect’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20, pp. 1015–1034.Google Scholar

Ross, Alf (1950). Constitution of United Nations: Analysis of Structure and Function. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard.Google Scholar

Sala-Molins, Louis (1987). Le Code noir ou le calvaire de Canaan. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Sala-Molins, Louis (2006) Dark Side of the Light: Slavery and the French Enlightenment, Engl. trans. by Conteh-Morgan, J.. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.Google Scholar

Scheppele, Kim Lane (2006). ‘The Migration of Anti-constitutional Ideas: the Post-9/11 Globalization of Public Law and the International State of Emergency’, in Choudhry, S. (ed.), The Migration of Constitutional Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 347–373.Google Scholar

Schmale, Wolfgang (1988). Entchristianisierung, Revolution und Verfassung: Zur Mentalitätsgeschichte der Verfassung in Frankreich, 1715–1794. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl (1993). Verfassungslehre, 8th edn. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot [1st edn. 1928] [Engl. trans. Constitutional Theory. Durham/London: Duke University Press, 2008].Google Scholar

Sciulli, David (1992). Theory of Societal Constitutionalism: Foundations of a Non-Marxist Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Segato, Rita Laura (2011). ‘Que cada pueblo teja los hilos de su historia. El pluralismo jurídico en diálogo didáctico con legisladores’, in Chenaut, V., Gómez, M., Ortiz, H., and Sierra, M. T. (eds), Justicia y diversidad en América Latina. Pueblos indígenas ante la globalización. Mexico, DF: CIESAS/Quito: FLACSO, pp. 357–381.Google Scholar

Seitzer, Jeffrey and Thornhill, Christopher (2008). ‘Introduction to Carl Schmitt’s Constitutional Theory: Issues and Context’, in Schmitt, C., Constitutional Theory. Durham/London: Duke University Press, pp. 1–50.Google Scholar

Siehr, A (2004). ‘Derogation Measures under Article 4 ICCPR with Special Consideration of the “war Against International Terrorism”’, German Yearbook of International Law 47, pp. 545–593.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin (1989). ‘Language and political change’, in Ball, T., Farr, J., and Hanson, R. L. (eds), Political Innovation and conceptual Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 6–23.Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie (2000). ‘Judicial Globalization’, Virginia Journal of International Law 40, pp. 1103–1024.Google Scholar

Soto Barrientos, Francisco (2014). ‘Asamblea Constituyente: La Experiencia Latinoamericana y el Actual Debate en Chile’, Estudios Constitucionales 12, pp. 397–428.Google Scholar

Stourzh, Gerald (1989). ‘Vom aristotelischen zum liberalen Verfassungsbegriff. Staatsformenlehre und Fundamentalgesetze in England und Nordamerika im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert’, in Stourzh, G., Wege zur Grundrechtsdemokratie: Studien zur Begriffs und Institutionengeschichte des liberalen Verfassungsstaates. Vienna/Cologne: Böhlau, pp. 1–35.Google Scholar

Sweet Stone, Alec (2009). ‘Constitutionalism, Legal Pluralism, and International Relations’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 16, pp. 621–645.Google Scholar

Teitel, Ruti (1994). ‘Post-Communist Constitutionalism: A Transitional Perspective’, Columbia Human Rights Law Review 26, pp. 167–90.Google Scholar

Teubner, Gunther (1996a). ‘Globale Bukowina: Zur Emergenz eines transnationalen Rechtspluralismus’, Rechtshistorisches Journal 15, pp. 255–290 [Engl. trans. (1997): ‘Global Bukowina: Legal Pluralism in the World Society’, in G. Teubner (ed.), Global Law without a State. Aldershot: Dartmouth, pp. 3–28].Google Scholar

Teubner, Gunther (1996b). ‘Des Königs viele Leiber: Die Selbstdekonstruktion der Hierarchie des Rechts’, Soziale Systeme: Zeitschrift für soziologische Theorie 2, pp. 229–55.Google Scholar

Teubner, Gunther (2000). ‘Privatregimes: Neo-Spontanes Recht und duale Sozialverfassungen in der Weltgesellschaft’, in Simon, D. and Weiss, M. (eds), Zur Autonomie des Individuums. Liber Amicorum Spiro Simitis. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2000, pp. 437–53 [Engl. trans. (2004a): ‘Global private regimes: Neo-spontaneous Law and Dual Constitution of Autonomous Sectors in World Society?’, in Ladeur, K.-H. (ed.), Public Governance in the Age of Globalization. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 71–87].Google Scholar

Teubner, Gunther (2003). ‘Globale Zivilverfassungen: Alternativen zur staatszentrierten Verfassungstheorie’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 63, pp. 1–28 [Engl. trans. (2004b): ‘Societal Constitutionalism: Alternatives to State-centred Constitutional theory?’, in Joerges, C., Sand, I.-J., and Teubner, G. (eds), Transnational Governance and Constititionalism. Oxford: Hart, pp. 3–28].Google Scholar

Teubner, Gunther (2006). ‘Die Anonyme Matrix: Zu Menschenrechtsverletzungen durch “private” transnationale Akteure’, Der Staat 45, pp. 161–187 [Engl. trans. (2006): ‘The Anonymous Matrix: Human Rights Violations by “Private” Transnational Actors’, Modern Law Review 69, pp. 327–346].Google Scholar

Teubner, Gunther (2008). ‘Selbstsubversive Gerechtigkeit: Kontingenz- oder Transzendenzformel des Rechts’, Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 29, pp. 9–36 [Engl. trans. (2009): ‘Self-Subversive Justice: Contingency or Transcendence Formula of Law?’, Modern Law Review 72, pp. 1–23].Google Scholar

Teubner, Gunther (2012). Verfassungsfragmente: gesellschaftlicher Konstitutionalismus in der Globalisierung. Berlin: Suhrkamp [Engl. trans. (2012): Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press].Google Scholar

Teubner, Gunther (2015). Exogenous Self-Binding: How Social Systems Externalise their Foundational Paradoxes in the Process of Constitutionalization’, in Corsi, G. and Febbrajo, A. (eds), Sociology of Constitutions. A Paradoxical Perspective. Oxford/New York: Routledge, pp. 229–256.Google Scholar

Teubner, Gunther and Beckers, Anna (2013). ‘Expanding Constitutionalism’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20, pp. 523–550.Google Scholar

Teubner, Gunther and Beckers, Anna and Fishcher-Lescano, Andreas (2008). ‘Cannibalizing Epistemes: Will Modern Law Protect Traditional Cultural Expressions?’, in Graber, C. B. and Burri-Nenova, M. (eds), Traditional Cultural Expressions in a Digital Environment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 17–45.Google Scholar

Thornhill, Chris (2008). ‘Towards a Historical Sociology of Constitutional Legitimacy’, Theory and Society 37, pp. 161–197.Google Scholar

Thornhill, Chris (2011). A Sociology of Constitutions. Constitutions and State Legitimacy in Historical-Sociological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Thornhill, Chris (2012). ‘Contemporary Constitutionalism and the Dialectic of Constituent Power’, Global Constitutionalism 1(3), pp. 369–404.Google Scholar

Thornhill, Chris (2013). ‘A Sociology of Constituent Power: The Political Code of Transnational Societal Constitution’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20, pp. 551–603.Google Scholar

Thornhill, Chris (2014). ‘Rights and Constituent Power in the Global Constitution’, International Journal of Law in Context 10, pp. 357–96.Google Scholar

Tomkins, Adam and Scott, Paul (eds) (2015). Entick v Carrington: 250 Years of the Rule of Law. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar

Tomuschat, Christian (1995). ‘Die internationale Gemeinschaft’, Archiv des Völkerrechts 33, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar

Tomuschat, Christian (1997). ‘International Law as the Constitution of Mankind’, in United Nations (ed.), International Law on the Eve of the Twenty-first Century: Views from the International Law Commission. New York: United Nations, pp. 37–50.Google Scholar

Tully, James (2007). ‘The Imperialism of Modern Constitutional Democracy’, in Loughlin, M. and Walker, N. (eds), The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 315–338.Google Scholar

Tushnet, Mark (2008). “The Inevitable Globalization of Constitutional Law”, paper presented at the seminar “The Changing Role of Highest Courts in an Internationalizing World”, sponsored by The Hague Institute for the Internationalisation of Law, on 23–24 October 2008, 22 pages (available at: SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1317766).Google Scholar

Uerpmann, R (2001). ‘Internationales Verfassungsrecht’, Juristenzeitung – JZ 56(11), pp. 565–573.Google Scholar

Verdross, Alfred (1926). Die Verfassung der Völkerrechtsgemeinschaft. Vienna/Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Verdross, Alfred and Simma, Bruno (1984). Universelles Völkerrecht: Theorie und Praxis, 3rd edn. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.Google Scholar

Von Bogdandy, Armin (2004). ‘Constitution in International Law: Comment on a Proposal from Germany’, Harvard International Law Journal 47, pp. 223–242.Google Scholar

Von Foerster, Heinz (1981). ‘On Constructing Reality’, in von Foerster, H.. Observing Systems. Seaside: Intersystems Publications, pp. 288–309.Google Scholar

Vorländer, Hans (1999). Die Verfassung: Idee und Geschichte. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar

Wahl, Rainer (2002). ‘Konstitutionalisierung – Leitbegriff oder Allerweltsbegriff?’, in Eberle, C. E., Ibler, M. and Lorenz, D. (eds), Der Wandel des Staates vor den Herausforderungen der Gegenwart: Festschrift für Winfried Brohm zum 70. Geburtstag. Munich: Beck, pp. 191–207.Google Scholar

Walker, Neil (2002). ‘The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism’, Modern Law Review 65, pp. 317–359.Google Scholar

Walker, Neil (2007). ‘Post-Constituent Constitutionalism: The Case of the European Union’, in Loughlin, M. and Walker, N. (eds), The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 247–267.Google Scholar

Wallerstein, Immanuel (1979). ‘Aufstieg und künftiger Niedergang des kapitalistischen Weltsystems’, in Senghaas, D. (ed.), Kapitalistische Weltökonomie: Kontroverse über ihren Ursprung und ihre Entwicklungsdynamik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 31–67.Google Scholar

Wallerstein, Immanuel (2004). World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Durham/London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Weber, (1968). ‘Idealtypus, Handlungsstruktur und Verhaltensinterpretation (Auszüge)’, in Weber, M., Methodologische Schriften, Winckelmann, J. (ed.). Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, pp. 65–167.Google Scholar

Weber, (1973). ‘Die ‘Objektivität’ sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis’, in Weber, M., Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, Winckelmann, J. (ed.), 4th edn. Tübingen: Mohr, pp. 146–214 [first published in Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 19, 1904] [Engl. trans. (1949): ‘“Objectivity” in Social Science and Social Policy’, in M. Weber, The Methodology of the Social Sciences. New York: The Free Press, pp. 50–112].Google Scholar

Welsch, Wolfgang (1996). Vernunft: Die zeitgenössische Vernunftkritik und das Konzept der transversalen Vernunft, 2nd edn. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Welsch, Wolfgang (2002). Unsere postmoderne Moderne, 6th edn. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar

Wielsch, Dan (2013). ‘Private Governance of Knowledge: Societally-Crafted Intellectual Properties Regimes’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20, pp. 907–940.Google Scholar

Willke, Helmut (1992). Ironie des Staates: Grundlinien einer Staatstheorie polyzentrischer Gesellschaft, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Wolfrum, Rüdiger (2003). ‘The Attack of September 11, 2001, the Wars Against Taliban and Iraq: Is There a Need to Reconsider International Law on the Recourse to Force and the Rules of Armed Conflict’, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 7, pp. 1–78.Google Scholar

Zolo, Danilo (1993). ‘Democratic Citizenship in a Post-communist Era’, in Held, D. (ed.), Prospect for Democracy: North, South, East, West. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 254–268.Google Scholar

Zúñiga Urbina, Francisco (2013). ‘Nueva Constitución y Operación Constituyente: Algunas notas acerca de la Reforma Constitucional y de la Asamblea Constituyente’, Estudios Constitucionales 11, pp. 511–540.Google Scholar