Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T19:36:56.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2012

Ryan C. Black
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Ryan J. Owens
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Get access

Summary

In 1915, Albert Einstein proposed the theory that gravity could influence light to bend, something that has come to be known as gravitational lensing. His theory was that the gravity from mass (e.g., a star or black hole) would pull on light photons as they traveled by, moving them out of their original trajectories. Of course, at the time, the sun was the only thing with enough mass to bend light that was close enough for scientists to observe. Thus, to test the theory, scientists needed to compare the observed position of the stars in the presence versus the absence of the sun. During the night, there would be no gravitational lensing, as the sun was not present. Conversely, during the day, the sun would theoretically bend the same light. Einstein's theory would be correct only if the position of the stars near the sun during the day appeared different than at night.

Though many people believed Einstein's theory was correct, there was one problem: no one could test it. During the day, the sun was so bright that no one could see the stars, let alone gauge whether their position appeared to shift as a result of gravitational lensing. No one could test the theory, that is, until Sir Arthur Eddington took advantage of a total solar eclipse. As fate would have it, when the moon passed between the sun and the earth in 1919, it blocked out the sun's rays such that Eddington could actually see the stars immediately around the sun.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Solicitor General and the United States Supreme Court
Executive Branch Influence and Judicial Decisions
, pp. 134 - 140
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Conclusion
  • Ryan C. Black, Michigan State University, Ryan J. Owens, University of Wisconsin, Madison
  • Book: The Solicitor General and the United States Supreme Court
  • Online publication: 05 May 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139058391.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Conclusion
  • Ryan C. Black, Michigan State University, Ryan J. Owens, University of Wisconsin, Madison
  • Book: The Solicitor General and the United States Supreme Court
  • Online publication: 05 May 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139058391.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Conclusion
  • Ryan C. Black, Michigan State University, Ryan J. Owens, University of Wisconsin, Madison
  • Book: The Solicitor General and the United States Supreme Court
  • Online publication: 05 May 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139058391.008
Available formats
×