Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Abbreviations
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction: The emergence of a pension fund champion: Switzerland in the worlds of welfare
- 1 The dress rehearsal for pension politics (1890–1914)
- 2 Laying the foundations of a divided pension system (1914–1938)
- 3 No monster like the Beveridge Plan. The wartime breakthrough of social insurance (1938–1948)
- 4 The three-pillar doctrine and the containment of social insurance (1948–1972)
- Epilogue. Aging in the shadow of the three pillars (1972–2006)
- Conclusion
- Appendix. A statistical overview of the second pillar
- Sources and references
- Index
2 - Laying the foundations of a divided pension system (1914–1938)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 June 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Abbreviations
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction: The emergence of a pension fund champion: Switzerland in the worlds of welfare
- 1 The dress rehearsal for pension politics (1890–1914)
- 2 Laying the foundations of a divided pension system (1914–1938)
- 3 No monster like the Beveridge Plan. The wartime breakthrough of social insurance (1938–1948)
- 4 The three-pillar doctrine and the containment of social insurance (1948–1972)
- Epilogue. Aging in the shadow of the three pillars (1972–2006)
- Conclusion
- Appendix. A statistical overview of the second pillar
- Sources and references
- Index
Summary
Among the industrialized countries, Germany, Austria, France, the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, Sweden, and Denmark had introduced universal or means-tested pension schemes before 1914. During the interwar decades, Belgium, Italy, Canada, the Netherlands, Norway, and the United States followed suit. By 1935, when the Social Security Act was introduced in the United States, Switzerland was one of the only European industrialized countries without national-level pensions. Yet, old age and survivors' insurance (Alters- und Hinterlassenenversicherung, AHV) constituted a very contentious item on the Swiss postwar political agenda. After a decade of political debate, the law introducing federal pensions was challenged by a referendum and defeated in 1931. The demise of the Lex Schulthess – named after its Radical architect, Federal Councilor Edmund Schulthess – postponed the introduction of pensions until the aftermath of World War II.
The struggle for the AHV was carried out in the public arena and endured a conflict-ridden and protracted policy-making process. In contrast, occupational provision began its expansion behind the scenes, in particular in the interstices of the tax code, and its evolution was rarely the focus of public controversies. This subterranean process coexisted with the highly contentious politics of social insurance. The first two sections of this chapter are devoted to these diverging trajectories.
In the aftermath of the war, political upheavals put the issue of social insurance at the top of the agenda.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Solidarity without the State?Business and the Shaping of the Swiss Welfare State, 1890–2000, pp. 57 - 115Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008