Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-17T23:25:55.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Phonetic Processes

from PART II - SOUNDS AND LETTERS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

J. C. Wells
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

But …

A correspondent asked me about the pronunciation of but when it means ‘except’, for example in contexts like I could come any day but Thursday, There's no one here but me, He was unable to swallow anything but liquids. Would native speakers use the weak form bət here, as in most other contexts; or would they prefer the strong form bʌt?

My answer is that in these cases I would normally use the weak form, bət. A strong form would sound odd.

The only cases in which strong bʌt is usual would appear to be

  1. • citation (‘mention’), as in no ifs and buts;

  2. • clumsy reading aloud;

  3. • for special emphasis

It'll be difficult, | \/but | it's still possible.

  1. • and when stranded by a following syntactic boundary.

Perfect? It's anything but!

Before a pause you can have either a weak or a strong realization.

We are not yet ahead, but … er … one day we shall be.

For the weak form in fluent speech, where the following sound is a consonant, we commonly get the glottalled variant bəʔ. I have noticed, though, that in my own speech if the following sound is the w of a function word, as in but what we ought to do, but when I arrived, I tend to say just , i.e. to elide the t entirely. I do not know to what extent other speakers do this.

Spinach Sandwiches

The questions that no one can answer often involve why. A Japanese student asked me, ‘Why do people pronounce sandwich with , given that the spelling is -ch?’

Not everyone does, of course. But in my BrE preference poll I found that 53% of respondents voted for -wɪdʒ in this word and only 47% for -wɪtʃ. Given the biasing effect of the spelling, the true figure for -wɪdʒ is probably quite a lot higher. (In AmE, on the other hand, I think we always get -wɪtʃ.)

The same alternation also seems to apply to all other words ending in -wich. Thus Norwich can be ˈnɒrɪdʒ, Woolwich can be ˈwʊlɪdʒ, Dulwich can be ˈdʌlɪdʒ.

Type
Chapter
Information
Sounds Fascinating
Further Observations on English Phonetics and Phonology
, pp. 73 - 84
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Phonetic Processes
  • J. C. Wells, University College London
  • Book: Sounds Fascinating
  • Online publication: 05 September 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316662342.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Phonetic Processes
  • J. C. Wells, University College London
  • Book: Sounds Fascinating
  • Online publication: 05 September 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316662342.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Phonetic Processes
  • J. C. Wells, University College London
  • Book: Sounds Fascinating
  • Online publication: 05 September 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316662342.011
Available formats
×