Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T04:34:32.339Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Class struggle in the Second Industrial Revolution, 1880–1914: III. The peasantry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2013

Michael Mann
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access

Summary

There has been little comparative work on agrarian classes. While workers have been done to death, peasants have been largely forgotten. Yet in almost all countries farmers constituted the largest population group, the largest voting bloc, and most of the soldiers. This chapter compares agrarian class struggles in four of the five countries on which I have focused, plus Russia and the Scandinavian countries of Denmark, Norway, and Sweden – the additions enabling me to represent “Leftist” agrarian politics adequately. The missing country is Great Britain. Most stratification theories from Marx onward were based on the British experience. Table 19.1 shows how misleading this is.

We see that Britain (excluding its Irish colony) remained deviant throughout the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. In 1911, only 9 percent of its labor force was in agriculture, less than one-third the percentage in any other major Power (minor Power Belgium had the next lowest, at 23 percent). In the other two most advanced economies, Germany and the United States, manufacturing and mining labor forces were only just then overtaking the agricultural and this had not occurred anywhere else besides Britain and Belgium. Whereas agriculture was insignificant in early twentieth-century British class relations, this was not true elsewhere. The outcome of the struggles charted in previous chapters among capital, labor, and the middle class would be decisively altered by agrarians. To theorize about modern class relations adequately, we must analyze the agrarian populations.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, P. 1974. Lineages of the Absolutist State. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Bairoch, P., et al. 1968. The Working Population and Its Structure. Brussels: Editions de l'Institut de Sociologie de l'Université Libre.Google Scholar
Barrai, P. 1968. Les Agrariens Francais de Méline à Pisan. Paris: Librairie Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Berger, S. 1972. Peasants Against Politics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackbourn, D. 1977. The Mittelstand in German society and politics, 1871–1914. Social History, no. 4.Google Scholar
Blackbourn, D. 1984. Peasants and politics in Germany, 1871–1914. European History Quarterly 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bois, P. 1960. Paysans de l'Ouest. Le Mans: Vilaire.Google Scholar
Boyer, J. W. 1981. Political Radicalism in Late Imperial Vienna. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brenner, R. 1976. Agrarian class structure and economic development in pre-industrial Europe. Past and Present, no. 70.Google Scholar
Bruchey, S. 1965. The Roots of American Economic Growth, 1607–1861. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Brustein, W. 1988. The Social Origins of Political Regionalism: France, 1849–1981. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Buck, S. 1913. The Granger Movement. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burbank, G. 1976. When Farmers Voted Red. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Burnham, W. 1974. The United States: the politics of heterogeneity. In Electoral Behavior: A Comparative Handbook, ed. R., Rose. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Castles, F. 1978. The Social Democratic Image of Society. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Conze, W. 1969. The effects of nineteenth-century liberal agrarian reforms on social structure in central Europe. In Essays in European Economic History, 1789–1914, ed. Crouzet, , Chaloner, , and Stern, . London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Danhof, C. 1969. Change in Agriculture: The Northern United States, 1820–1870. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dovring, F. 1965. Land and Labor in Europe in the Twentieth Century. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Duncan, S. 1982. Class relations and historical geography: the creation of the rural and urban questions in Sweden. Research Papers in Geography (University of Sussex), no. 12.Google Scholar
Dyson, L. 1986. Farmers' Organizations. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Eddie, S. 1967. The changing pattern of leadership in Hungary, 1867–1914. Economic History Review 20.Google Scholar
Eley, G. 1980. Reshaping the German Right: Radical Nationalism and Change After Bismarck. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. 1985. Politics Against Markets: The Social Democratic Road to Power. . Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Farr, I. 1978. Populism in the countryside: the peasant leagues in Bavaria in the 1890s. In Society and Politics in Wilhelmine Germany, ed. Richard J., Evans. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Farr, I. 1986. Peasant protest in the empire – the Bavarian example. In Peasants and Lords in Modern Germany: Recent Studies in Agricultural History, ed. R., Moeller. Boston: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Fine, N. 1928. Labor and Farmer Parties in the United States, 1828–1928. New York: Rand School of Social Science.Google Scholar
Fischer, F. W., et al. 1982. Sozialgeschichtliches Arbeitsbuch. Vol. I: Materialien zur Statistik des Deutschen Bundes, 1815–1870. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Gamer, G. 1973. Paysans du Beaujolais et du Lyonnais, 1800–1970. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.Google Scholar
Gerschenkron, A. 1943. Bread and Democracy in Germany. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Goodwyn, L. 1976. Democratic Promise: The Populist Moment in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grantham, G. 1975. Scale and organization in French farming, 1840–1880. In European Peasants and Their Markets, ed. E. L., Jones and W. N., Parker. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Green, J. 1976. Grass Roots Socialism. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, H. R. 1971. Rural Denmark and Its Lessons. London: Longman Group.Google Scholar
Haimson, L. 1979. Introduction: the Russian landed nobility and the system of the third of June, and Conclusion: observations on the politics of the Russian countryside (1905–14). In The Politics of Rural Russia, ed. L., Haimson. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hanak, P. 1975. Economics, society, and sociopolitical thought in Hungary during the age of capitalism. Austrian History Yearbook 9.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. 1931. The Populist Revolt. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. 1989. The Age of Empire. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Hohorst, V. G., et al. 1975. Sozialgeschichtliches Arbeitsbuch. Vol. I: Materialien zur Statistik des Kaiserreichs, 1870–1914. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Holmsen, A. 1956. Landowners and tenants in Norway. Scandinavian Economic History Review 6.Google Scholar
Hovde, B. 1943. The Scandinavian Countries, 1720–1865. Boston: Chapman & Grimes.Google Scholar
Hussain, A. 1981. Marxism and the Agrarian Question. Vol. 1: German Social Democracy and the Peasantry, 1890–1907. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J. C. 1986. Why do peasants rebel? structural and historical theories of modern peasant rebellions. American Journal of Sociology 88.Google Scholar
Jonasson, O. G. 1938. Agricultural Atlas of Sweden. Stockholm: Lantbruks-saellskapets.Google Scholar
Judt, T. 1979. Socialism in Provence, 1871–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kane, A., and M., Mann. 1992. A theory of early twentieth-century agrarian politics. Social Science History 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kausel, A. 1979. Osterreichs Volkseinkommen 1830 bis 1913. In Geschichte und Ergebrisse der Zentralen Amtlichen Statistik in Osterreich 1829–1979. Beitrage zur Osterreichischen Statistik 550.Google Scholar
Kautsky, K. 1988. The Agrarian Question. London: Zwan. (First published 1899.)Google Scholar
Kuhnle, S. 1975. Patterns of Social and Political Mobilization: A Historical Analysis of the Nordic Countries. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Kuuse, J. 1971. Mechanisation, commercialisation and the protectionist movement in Swedish agriculture, 1860–1910. Scandinavian Economic History Review 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Goff, T. J. A., and D. M. G., Sutherland. 1983. The social origins of counter-revolution in western France. Past and Present, no. 99.Google Scholar
Lewis, G. 1978. The peasantry, rural change and conservative agrarianism: Lower Austria at the turn of the century. Past and Present, no. 81.Google Scholar
Linz, J. 1976. Patterns of land tenure, division of labor, and voting behavior in Europe. Comparative Politics 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loubère, L. A. 1974. Radicalism in Mediterranean France, 1848–1914. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Lyashchenko, P. 1949. History of the National Economy of Russia to the 1917 Revolution. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Macartney, C. A. 1969. The Hapsburg Empire, 1790–1918. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Malefakis, E. 1970. Agrarian Reform and Peasant Revolution in Spain. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Margadant, T. W. 1979. French Peasants in Revolt. Princeton N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Marx, K., and F., Engels. 1968. Selected Works. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Medvedev, Z. 1987. Soviet Agriculture. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Merriman, J. 1979. Incident at the statue of the Virgin Mary: the conflict of the old and the new in nineteenth century Limoges. In Consciousness and Class Experience in Nineteenth Century Europe, ed. J., Merriman. New York: Holmes & Meier.Google Scholar
Ministère de l'agriculture. 1897. Statistique agricole de la France; résultats généraux de l'enquête decennale de 1892. Paris.
Moore, B. Jr. 1973. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Mouzelis, N. 1986. Politics in the Semi-Periphery: Early Parliamentarianism and Late Industrialization in the Balkans and Latin America. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munch, P. 1954. The peasant movement in Norway: a study in class and culture. British Journal of Sociology 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newby, H. 1977. The Deferential Worker. London: Lane.Google Scholar
Osterud, O. 1971. Agrarian Structure and Peasant Politics in Scandinavia: A Comparative Study of Rural Response to Economic Change. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Paige, J. 1976. Agrarian Revolution. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Pavlovsky, G. 1930. Agricultural Russia on the Eve of the Revolution. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Pech, S. 1978. Political parties in Eastern Europe, 1848–1939. East Central Europe 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, J. A. 1981. The agricultural revolution in Germany, 1850–1914. Journal of European Economic History 10.Google Scholar
Perrie, M. 1972. The Russian peasant movement of 1905–1907: its social composition and revolutionary significance. Past and Present, no. 57.Google Scholar
Raeff, M. 1966. Origins of the Russian Intelligentsia: The Eighteenth Century Nobility. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Robinson, G. 1932. Rural Russia Under the Old Regime. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rokkan, S. 1970. Cities, Elections, Parties. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Rosen, E. 1978. Socialism in Oklahoma: a theoretical overview. Politics and Society 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, M. 1988. Farmer movements and organizations: numbers, gains, and losses. Agricultural History 62.Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, D., E., Stephens, and J., Stephens. 1992. Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sandgruber, R. 1978. Osterreichische Agrärstatistik, 1750–1918. Munich: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
See, H. 1929. Equisse d'une Histoire Economique et Sociale de la France. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
Semmingsen, I. 1954. The dissolution of estate society in Norway. Scandinavian Economie History Review 2.Google Scholar
Shanin, T. 1972. The Awkward Class. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Shanin, T. 1985. Russia as a “Developing Society”: The Roots of Otherness – Russia's Turn of the Century, Vol. I. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sked, A. 1989. The Decline and Fall of the Hapsburg Empire, 1815–1918. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. H. 1975. Work routine and social structure in a French village: Cruzy in the nineteenth century. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 3.Google Scholar
Sorokin, P. A., et al. 1930. A Systematic Source Book in Rural Sociology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Stephens, J. 1979. The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinchcombe, A. L. 1961. Agricultural enterprise and rural class relations. American Journal of Sociology 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, A. 1977. Social democracy in Denmark. In Social Democratic Parties in Western Europe, ed. W., Paterson and A., Thomas. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. 1967. The Vendée, 3d ed. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. 1979. Did the cake of custom break? In Consciousness and Class Experience in Nineteenth Century Europe, ed. Merriman, J.. New York: Holmes & Meier.Google Scholar
Tomasevich, J. 1955. Peasants, Politics, and Economic Change in Yugoslavia. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau. 1910. U.S. Census, 1910. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Vinogradoff, E. 1979. The Russian peasantry and the elections to the Fourth State Duma. In The Politics of Rural Russia, ed. L., Haimson. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Volin, L. 1960. The Russian peasant: from emancipation to kolkhoz. In The Transformation of the Russian Peasantry, ed. C., Black. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Walkin, J. 1962. The Rise of Democracy in Pre-revolutionary Russia. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Weber, E. 1978. Peasants Into Frenchmen. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1978. Economy and Society. Berkeley: Univeristy of California Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, E. 1969. Peasant Wars of the Twentieth Century. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×