Aalberts, Tanja 2004. “The Sovereignty Game States Play: (Quasi-)states in the International Order,” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 17: 245–257.Google Scholar

Abraham, Itty and van Schendel, Willem 2005. Illicit Flows and Criminal Things: States, Borders, and the Other Side of Globalization. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Abrahamian, Atossa Araxia 2015. The Cosmopolites: The Coming of the Global Citizen. Columbia Global Reports.Google Scholar

Agamben, Giorgio 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Ahrensdorf, Peter 2000. “The Fear of Death and the Longing for Immortality: Hobbes and Thucydides on Human Nature and the Problem of Anarchy,” American Political Science Review 94: 579–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Al-Atawneh, Muhammad 2009. “Is Saudi Arabia a Theocracy? Religion and Governance in Contemporary Saudi Arabia,” Middle Eastern Studies 45: 721–737.Google Scholar

Alchian, Armen 1991. “Property Rights,” in Eatwell, John, Milgate, Murray, and Newman, Peter, eds. The New Palgrave: The World of Economics. Macmillan.Google Scholar

Allan, Bentley 2018. Scientific Cosmology and International Orders. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Allison, Graham and Halperin, Morton H. 1972. “Bureaucratic Politics: A Paradigm and Some Policy Implications,” World Politics 24: 40–79.Google Scholar

Almond, Gabriel and Genco, Stephen 1977. “Clouds, Clocks, and the Study of Politics,” World Politics 29: 489–522.Google Scholar

Ambrosius, Lloyd 1991. Wilsonian Statecraft: Theory and Practice of Liberal Internationalism during World War I. Scholarly Resources.Google Scholar

Anderson, Benedict 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. Verso.Google Scholar

Andreas, Peter 2000. Border Games: Policing the U.S.–Mexico Divide. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Andreas, Peter 2004. “Illicit International Political Economy: The Clandestine Side of Globalization,” Review of International Political Economy 11: 641–652.Google Scholar

Antarctic Treaty 1959. The Antarctic Treaty. Conference on Antarctica.Google Scholar

Associated Press 2019. “Many Latin American Governments Support Venezuela’s Guaido,” New York Times, January 23.Google Scholar

Baker, Ray Stannard 1922. Woodrow Wilson and World Settlement, Vol. 1. Doubleday, Page.Google Scholar

Barber, Benjamin 1995. Jihad vs. McWorld: How Globalism and Tribalism Are Reshaping the World. Ballantine Books.Google Scholar

Barbey, Christophe 2015. “Non-Militarisation: Countries without Armies,” The Ålands Islands Peace Institute.Google Scholar

Barkin, J. Samuel 1998. “The Evolution of the Constitution of Sovereignty and the Emergence of Human Rights Norms,” Millennium 27: 229–252.Google Scholar

Barkin, J. Samuel 2003. Social Construction and the Logic of Money: Financial Predominance and International Economic Leadership. State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Barkin, J. Samuel 2010. Realist Constructivism: Rethinking International Relations Theory. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barkin, J. Samuel 2013. International Organization: Theories and Institutions, 2nd ed. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Barkin, J. Samuel 2015a. “On the Heuristic Use of Formal Models in International Relations Theory,” International Studies Review 17: 617–634.Google Scholar

Barkin, J. Samuel 2015b. “Racing All Over the Place: A Dispersion Model of International Regulatory Competition,” European Journal of International Relations 21: 171–193.Google Scholar

Barkin, J. Samuel and Cronin, Bruce 1994. “The State and the Nation: Changing Norms and the Rules of Sovereignty in International Relations,” International Organization 48: 107–130.Google Scholar

Barkin, J. Samuel and DeSombre, Elizabeth R. 2013. Saving Global Fisheries: Reducing Fishing Capacity to Promote Sustainability. The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barkin, J. Samuel and Weitsman, Patricia A. 2019. “Realist Institutionalism and the Institutional Mechanisms of Power Politics,” in Wivel, Anders and Paul, T. V., eds. International Institutions and Power Politics. Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Barnett, Michael and Duvall, Raymond 2005. “Power in International Politics,” International Organization 59: 39–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartelson, Jens 1995. A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Barton, John, Goldstein, Judith, Josling, Timothy, and Steinberg, Richard 2006. The Evolution of the Trade Regime: Politics, Law, and Economics of the GATT and the WTO. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision 2010. Basel III: A Global Regulatory Framework for More Resilient Banks and Banking Systems. Bank for International Settlements.Google Scholar

Baumgold, Deborah 2005. “Hobbes’s and Locke’s Contract Theories: Political not Metaphysical,” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8: 289–308.Google Scholar

Bellamy, Alex 2014. Responsibility to Protect: A Defense. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benhabib, Seyla 2005. “Borders, Boundaries, and Citizenship,” PS: Political Science & Politics 38: 673–677.Google Scholar

Berman, Harold 1983. Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bhagwati, Jagdish 1991. The World Trading System at Risk. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Biersteker, Thomas and Weber, Cynthia, eds. 1996. State Sovereignty as Social Construct. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bliss, F. Allen 1994. “Rethinking Restrictions on Cabotage: Moving to Free Trade in Passenger Aviation,” Suffolk Transnational Law Review 17: 382.Google Scholar

Bloch, Marc 1961. Feudal Society. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bodansky, Daniel 1995. “Customary (and Not So Customary) International Environmental Law,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 3: 105.Google Scholar

Bodin, Jean 1945 (1566). Method for the Easy Comprehension of History. Translated by Beatrice Reynolds. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Bogdanor, Vernon 1997. The Monarchy and the Constitution. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Boland, Vincent 2017. “Ireland’s ‘De-Globalized’ Data Calculate a Smaller Economy,” Financial Times, July 18.Google Scholar

Boxer, C. R. 1974. The Anglo-Dutch Wars of the Seventeenth Century, 1652–1674. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.Google Scholar

Branch, Jordan 2012. “‘Colonial Reflection’ and Territoriality: The Peripheral Origins of Sovereign Statehood,” European Journal of International Relations 18: 277–297.Google Scholar

Bratspies, Rebecca and Miller, Russell, eds. 2006. Transboundary Harm in International Law: Lessons from the Trail Smelter Arbitration. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Broadhead, Lee-Anne 2002. International Environmental Politics: The Limits of Green Diplomacy. Lynne Reinner.Google Scholar

Brysk, Alison and Shafir, Gershon, eds. 2004. People Out of Place: Globalization, Human Rights, and the Citizenship Gap. Routledge.Google Scholar

Buchheit, Lee 1978. Secession: The Legitimacy of Self-Determination. Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Bull, Hedley 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Macmillan.Google Scholar

Burch, Kurt 1998. “Property” and the Making of the International System. Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar

Burch, Kurt 2000. “Changing the Rules: Reconceiving Change in the Westphalian System,” International Studies Review 2: 181–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin, and Miller, Peter, eds. 1991. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burdick, Alan 2017. Why Time Flies: A Mostly Scientific Investigation. Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Burgerman, Susan 2001. Moral Victories: How Activists Provoke Multilateral Action. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Burgess, John 1890. Political Science and Comparative Constitutional Law. Volume I: Sovereignty and Liberty. Ginn & Co.Google Scholar

Burley, Anne-Marie 1993. “Regulating the World: Multilateralism, International Law, and the Projection of the New Deal Regulatory State,” in Ruggie, John Gerard, ed., Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Capoccia, Giovanni and Kelemen, R. Daniel 2007. “The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism,” World Politics 59: 341–369.Google Scholar

Caulkins, Jonathan, Reuter, Peter H., Iguchi, Martin Y., and Chiesa, James 2005. How Goes the “War on Drugs”? Rand Corporation.Google Scholar

Cerny, Philip 1998. “Neomedievalism, Civil War and the New Security Dilemma: Globalisation as Durable Disorder,” Civil Wars 1: 36–64.Google Scholar

Chayes, Abram and Chayes, Antonia Handler 1993. “On Compliance,” International Organization 47: 175–205.Google Scholar

Chulov, Martin 2018. “‘We Will Get Him: The Long Hunt for ISIS Leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi,” The Guardian, January 15.Google Scholar

Clark, Ian 2005. Legitimacy in International Society. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Coase, Ronald 1959. “The Federal Communications Commission,” Journal of Law and Economics 2: 1–40.Google Scholar

Coase, Ronald 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost,” Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–44.Google Scholar

Coggins, Bridget 2014. Power Politics and State Formation in the Twentieth Century: The Dynamics of Recognition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cooley, Alexander and Spruyt, Hendrik 2009. Contracting States: Sovereign Transfers in International Relations. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Craig, Gordon 1971. Europe since 1815, 3rd ed. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Cronin, Bruce 1999. Community under Anarchy: Transnational Identity and the Evolution of Cooperation. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Croucher, Sheila 2018. Globalization and Belonging: The Politics of Identity in a Changing World. Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Croxton, Derek 2015. Westphalia: The Last Christian Peace. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

D’Amato, Anthony and Falk, Richard Anderson 1971. The Concept of Custom in International Law. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

DeSombre, Elizabeth R. 2005. “Fishing Under Flags of Convenience: Using Market Power to Increase Participation in International Regulation,” Global Environmental Politics 5: 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeSombre, Elizabeth R. 2006. Flagging Standards: Globalization and Environmental, Safety, and Labor Regulations at Sea. The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dimitrov, Radoslav 2020. “Empty Institutions in Global Environmental Politics,” International Studies Review 22: 626–650. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viz029.Google Scholar

Drezner, Daniel 2001. “Sovereignty for Sale,” Foreign Policy 125: 76–77.Google Scholar

Drezner, Daniel 2007. All Politics Is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Economist 2019. “Siege on the Mediterranean,” The Economist, July 6-12: 39–40.Google Scholar

Ekelund, Robert and Tollison, Robert 1981. Mercantilism as a Rent-Seeking Society: Economic Regulation in Historical Perspective. Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar

Everitt, Anthony 2009. Hadrian and the Triumph of Rome. Random House.Google Scholar

Fairbank, John, ed. 1968. The Chinese World Order: Traditional China’s Foreign Relations. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Farrell, Graham and Thorne, John 2005. “Where Have All the Flowers Gone? Evaluation of the Taliban Crackdown against Opium Poppy Cultivation in Afghanistan,” International Journal of Drug Policy 16: 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fearon, James 1995. “Rationalist Explanations for War,” International Organization 49: 379–414.Google Scholar

Ferrel, Robert 1985. Woodrow Wilson and World War I: 1917–1921. Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Ferrero, Guglielmo 1941. The Reconstruction of Europe: Talleyrand and the Congress of Vienna, 1814–1815. G.P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar

Festinger, Leon 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha 1996. National Interests in International Society. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha 2004. The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs About the Use of Force. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change,” International Organization 52: 887–917.Google Scholar

Fligstein, Neil, Polyakova, Alina, and Sandholtz, Wayne 2012. “European Integration, Nationalism, and European Identity,” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 50: 106–122.Google Scholar

Franklin, Julian 1973. Jean Bodin and the Rise of Absolutist Theory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Friedheim, Robert, ed. 2001. Toward A Sustainable Whaling Regime. University of Washington Press.Google Scholar

Friedrichs, Jörg 2007. Fighting Terrorism and Drugs: Europe and International Police Cooperation. Routledge.Google Scholar

Gardam, Judith 1993. Non-Combatant Immunity as a Norm of International Humanitarian Law. M. Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar

Gee, Graham and Young, Alison 2016. “Regaining Sovereignty? Brexit, the UK Parliament and the Common Law,” European Public Law 22: 131–147.Google Scholar

Geitner, Paul 2004. “EU Signs $1.25B Deal with Philip Morris,” Associated Press, July 9.Google Scholar

Gellner, Ernest 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Gilley, Bruce 2006. “The Meaning and Measure of State Legitimacy: Results for 72 Countries,” European Journal of Political Research 45: 499–525.Google Scholar

Gilpin, Robert 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Glaeser, Edward and Shleifer, Andrei 2001. “The Rise of the Regulatory State,” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 8650. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar

Goddard, Stacie 2009. “When Right makes Might: How Prussia Overturned the European Balance of Power,” International Security 33: 110–142.Google Scholar

Goldstein, Judith, Kahler, Miles, Keohane, Robert O., and Slaughter, Anne-Marie, eds. 2001. Legalization and World Politics. The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Gore, Charles 2000. “The Rise and Fall of the Washington Consensus as a Paradigm for Developing Countries,” World Development 28: 789–804.Google Scholar

Grigorescu, Alexandru 2007. “Transparency of International Organizations: The Roles of Member States, International Bureaucracies, and Nongovernmental Organizations,” International Studies Quarterly 51: 625–648.Google Scholar

Gros, Daniel 2013. “Banking Union with a Sovereign Virus: The Self-Serving Treatment of Sovereign Debt,” Intereconomics 48: 93–97.Google Scholar

Gross, Leo 1948. “The Peace of Westphalia, 1648–1948,” American Journal of International Law 42: 20–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grovogui, Siba N’Zatioula 1996. Sovereigns, Quasi Sovereigns, and Africans: Race and Self-Determination in International Law. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Gruber, Lloyd 2000. Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Guardian, 2019. “Chakrabarti Defends Jeremy Corbyn’s Venezuela Remarks,” The Guardian, February 3.Google Scholar

Guilfoyle, Douglas 2009. Shipping Interdiction and the Law of the Sea. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gulbrandsen, Lars 2010. Transnational Environmental Governance: The Emergence and Effects of the Certification of Forests and Fisheries. Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Guzzini, Stefano 1998. Realism in International Relations and International Political Economy: The Continuing Story of a Death Foretold. Routledge.Google Scholar

Guzzini, Stefano 2000. “A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations,” European Journal of International Relations 6: 147–182.Google Scholar

Guzzini, Stefano 2005. “The Concept of Power: A Constructivist Analysis,” Millennium 33: 495–521.Google Scholar

Haas, Ernst 1997. Nationalism, Liberalism, and Progress, Vol. 1: The Rise and Decline of Nationalism. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. Translated by McCarthy, Thomas. Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Hacking, Ian 1999. The Social Construction of What? Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hall, Rodney Bruce 1998. National Collective Identity: Social Constructs and International Systems. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Harper, Kyle 2011. Slavery in the Late Roman World, AD 275–425. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Haufler, Virginia 2001. A Public Role for the Private Sector: Industry Self-Regulation in a Global Economy. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. F. W. 1974. Hegel: The Essential Writings, Weiss, Frederick, ed. Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Helleiner, Eric 2014. Forgotten Foundations of Bretton Woods: International Development and the Making of the Postwar Order. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Henkin, Louis 1979. How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas 1991 (1651). Leviathan. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hobsbawm, Eric 1990. Nations and Nationalism Since 1780. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Holland, Ben 2010. “Sovereignty as Dominium? Reconstructing the Constructivist Roman Law Thesis,” International Studies Quarterly 54: 449–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holland, Max 1994. “After Thirty Years: Making Sense of the Assassination,” Reviews in American History 22: 191–209.Google Scholar

Holsti, Kalevi 1992. “Governance Without Government: Polyarchy in Nineteenth-Century European International Politics,” in Rosenau, James N. and Czempiel, Ernst-Otto, eds. Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hoppe, Carsten 2008. “Passing the Buck: State Responsibility for Private Military Companies,” European Journal of International Law 19: 989–1014.Google Scholar

Hozic, Aida 2004. “Between the Cracks: Balkan Cigarette Smuggling,” Problems of Post-Communism 51: 35–44.Google Scholar

Hurka, Thomas 2005. “Proportionality in the Morality of War,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 33: 34–66.Google Scholar

Inayatullah, Naeem 1996. “Beyond the Sovereignty Dilemma: Quasi-States as Social Construct,” in Biersteker, Thomas and Weber, Cynthia, eds. State Sovereignty as Social Construct. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus 2011. The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics. Routledge.Google Scholar

Jackson, Robert 1993. Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jackson, , 2007. Sovereignty: The Evolution of an Idea. Polity.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Harold, Reisinger, William, and Mathers, Todd 1986. “National Entanglements in International Governmental Organizations,” American Political Science Review 80: 141–159.Google Scholar

Jervis, Robert 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kaczynski, Vlad and Fluharty, David 2002. “European Policies in West Africa: Who Benefits from Fisheries Agreements?” Marine Policy 26: 75–93.Google Scholar

Kahler, Miles and Lake, David, eds. 2003. Governance in a Global Economy: Political Authority in Transition. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kalmo, Hent and Skinner, Quentin, eds. 2010. Sovereignty in Fragments: The Past, Present, and Future of a Contested Concept. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kann, Robert 1950. The Multinational Empire: Nationalism and National Reform in the Habsburg Monarchy, 1848–1918. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Keck, Margaret and Sikkink, Kathryn 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Kelley, Judith 2008. “Assessing the Complex Evolution of Norms: The Rise of International Election Monitoring,” International Organization 62: 221–255.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert 1982. “The Demand for International Regimes,” International Organization 36: 325–355.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Khanna, Parag 2009. “Neomedievalism,” Foreign Policy 172: 91.Google Scholar

Kissinger, Henry 1958. A World Restored: Metternich, Castlereagh, and the Problems of Peace, 1812–1822. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Klein, Daniel and Robinson, John 2011. “Property: A Bundle of Rights? Prologue to the Property Symposium,” Econ Journal Watch 8: 193–204.Google Scholar

Klotz, Audie 1995. Norms in International Relations: The Struggle Against Apartheid. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Klotz, Audie and Lynch, Cecilia 2007. Strategies for Research in Constructivist International Relations. M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar

Kobrin, Stephen 1998. “Back to the Future: Neomedievalism and the Postmodern Digital World Economy,” Journal of International Affairs 51: 361–386.Google Scholar

Kocs, Stephen 1994. “Explaining the Strategic Behavior of States: International Law as System Structure,” International Studies Quarterly 38: 535–556.Google Scholar

Kolstad, Ivar and Søreide, Tina 2009. “Corruption in Natural Resource Management: Implications for Policy Makers,” Resources Policy 34: 214–226.Google Scholar

Korten, David 2001. When Corporations Rule the World, 2nd ed. Kumarian Press.Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen 1993. “Westphalia and All That,” in Goldstein, Judith and Keohane, Robert O., eds. Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen 1995. “Sovereignty and Intervention,” in Lyons, Gene and Mastanduno, Michael, eds. Beyond Westphalia: State Sovereignty and International Intervention. The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kratochwil, Friedrich 1994. “The Limits of Contract,” European Journal of International Law 4: 465–491.Google Scholar

Kratochwil, Friedrich 1995. “Sovereignty as Dominium: Is There a Right of Humanitarian Intervention?” in Lyons, Gene and Mastanduno, Michael, eds. Beyond Westphalia: State Sovereignty and International Intervention. The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Krebs, Ronald and Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus 2007. “Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric,” European Journal of International Relations 13: 35–66.Google Scholar

Lake, David 2003. “The New Sovereignty in International Relations,” International Studies Review 5: 303–323.Google Scholar

Leander, Anna 2005. “The Power to Construct International Security: On the Significance of Private Military Companies,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33: 803–825.Google Scholar

Leander, Anna 2011. “The Promises, Problems, and Potentials of a Bourdieu-Inspired Staging of International Relations,” International Political Sociology 5: 294–313.Google Scholar

Lee, Daniel 2008. “Private Law Models for Public Law Concepts: The Roman Law Theory of Dominium in the Monarchomach Doctrine of Popular Sovereignty,” The Review of Politics 70: 370–399.Google Scholar

Levi, Margaret, Sacks, Audrey, and Tyler, Tom 2009. “Conceptualizing Legitimacy, Measuring Legitimating Beliefs,” American Behavioral Scientist 53: 354–375.Google Scholar

Locke, John 1960 (1688). Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lumsdaine, David 1993. Moral Vision in International Politics: The Foreign Aid Regime, 1949–1989. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Luoma-Aho, Mika 2009. “Political Theology, Anthropomorphism, and Person-hood of the State: The Religion of IR,” International Political Sociology 3: 293–309.Google Scholar

Lyons, Martyn 1994. Napoleon Bonaparte and the Legacy of the French Revolution. St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar

Macpherson, Crawford Brough 1962. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mander, Jerry and Goldsmith, Edward, eds. 1996. The Case Against the Global Economy: And for a Turn Toward the Local. Sierra Club Books.Google Scholar

March, James and Olsen, Johan 1998. “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders,” International Organization 52: 943–969.Google Scholar

Mathias, Peter 1983. The First Industrial Nation: An Economic History of Britain, 2nd ed. Methuen.Google Scholar

McCourt, David 2016. “Practice Theory and Relationalism as the New Constructivism,” International Studies Quarterly 60: 475–485.Google Scholar

McNamara, Kathleen 1997. “Globalization Is What We Make of It? The Social Construction of Market Imperatives,” paper presented at the 1997 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

McNamara, Kathleen 1998. The Currency of Ideas: Monetary Politics in the European Union. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

McNeill, William 1982. The Pursuit of Power: Technology, Armed Force, and Society since A.D. 1000. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Mee, Charles Jr. 1980. The End of Order: Versailles 1919. Dutton.Google Scholar

Mitzen, Jennifer 2006. “Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma,” European Journal of International Relations 12: 341–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, Mick 2004. “Revenues, State Formation, and the Quality of Governance in Developing Countries,” International Political Science Review 25: 297–319.Google Scholar

Moran, Michael 2002. “Understanding the Regulatory State,” British Journal of Political Science 32: 391–413.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew 2004. “Is There a ‘Democratic Deficit’ in World Politics? A Framework for Analysis,” Government and Opposition 39: 336–363.Google Scholar

Morgenthau, Hans 1940. “Positivism, Functionalism, and International Law,” American Journal of International Law 34: 260–284.Google Scholar

Morgenthau, Hans 1948. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. Knopf.Google Scholar

Morris, Justin 2013. “Libya and Syria: R2P and the Spectre of the Swinging Pendulum,” International Affairs 89: 1265–1283.Google Scholar

Mueller, Milton, Mathiason, John, and Klein, Hans 2007. “The Internet and Global Governance: Principles and Norms for a New Regime,” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 13: 237–254.Google Scholar

Mumford, Lewis 1961. The City in History: Its Origins, Its Transformations, and its Prospects. Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar

Munn, Mark 2006. The Mother of the Gods, Athens, and the Tyranny of Asia: A Study of Sovereignty in Ancient Religion. University of California Press.Google Scholar

Murphy, Craig 2006. The United Nations Development Programme: A Better Way? Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Naim, Moises 2005. Illicit: How Smugglers, Traffickers, and Copycats Are Hijacking the Global Economy. Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Nayar, Baldev Raj 1995. “Regimes, Power, and International Aviation,” International Organization 49:139–170.Google Scholar

Neumann, Iver 2007. “‘A Speech That the Entire Ministry May Stand for,’ or: Why Diplomats Never Produce Anything New,” International Political Sociology 1: 183–200.Google Scholar

Newman, Peter 1978. The Bronfman Dynasty: The Rothschilds of the New World. McClelland and Stewart.Google Scholar

Nexon, Daniel and Wright, Thomas 2007. “What’s at Stake in the American Empire Debate,” American Political Science Review 101: 253–271.Google Scholar

Nielsen, Richard 2013. “Rewarding Human Rights? Selective Aid Sanctions against Repressive States,” International Studies Quarterly 57: 791–803.Google Scholar

North, Douglass 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

North, Douglass and Thomas, Robert Paul 1973. The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nye, Joseph Jr. 2001. “Globalization’s Democratic Deficit: How to Make International Institutions More Accountable,” Foreign Affairs 80: 2.Google Scholar

Ohmae, Kenichi 1995. The End of the Nation State, The Rise of Regional Economies: How New Engines of Prosperity Are Reshaping Global Markets. The Free Press.Google Scholar

Olson, Mancur 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Onnekink, David, ed. 2016. War and Religion after Westphalia, 1648–1713. Routledge.Google Scholar

Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood 1989. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Osiander, Andreas 1994. The States System of Europe, 1640–1990: Peacemaking and the Conditions of International Stability. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Osiander, Andreas 2001. “Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth,” International Organization 55: 251–287.Google Scholar

Paehlke, Robert 2002. Democracy’s Dilemma: Environment, Social Equity, and the Global Economy. The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Palan, Ronen 2003. The Offshore World: Sovereign Markets, Virtual Places, and Nomad Millionaires. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Palan, Ronen, Murphy, Richard, and Chavagneux, Christian 2013. Tax Havens: How Globalization Really Works. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Paterson, Owen 2017. “Don’t Listen to the Terrified Europeans. The Singapore Model Is our Brexit Opportunity,” The Telegraph, November 21.Google Scholar

Patrick, Stewart 2018. The Sovereignty Wars: Reconciling America with the World. Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Peterson, M. J. 1988. Managing the Frozen South: The Creation and Evolution of the Antarctic Treaty System. University of California Press.Google Scholar

Pflanze, Otto 1963. Bismarck and the Development of Germany: The Period of Unification, 1815–1871. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Price, Richard 1997. The Chemical Weapons Taboo. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Price, Richard 1998. “Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines,” International Organization 52: 613–644.Google Scholar

Prokhovnik, Raia 2007. Sovereignties: Contemporary Theory and Practice. Springer.Google Scholar

Raustiala, Kal 2000. “Compliance & Effectiveness in International Regulatory Cooperation,” Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 32: 387–440.Google Scholar

Ravishankar, M. N., Pan, Shan, and Myers, Michael 2013. “Information Technology Offshoring in India: A Postcolonial Perspective,” European Journal of Information Systems 22: 387–402.Google Scholar

Rawlings, Gregory 2007. “Taxes and Transnational Treaties: Responsive Regulation and the Reassertion of Offshore Sovereignty,” Law & Policy 29: 51–66.Google Scholar

Reno, William 2000. “Clandestine Economies, Violence and States in Africa,” Journal of International Affairs 53: 433–459.Google Scholar

Reus-Smit, Christian 1999. The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Risse, Thomas 2000. “Let’s Argue! Communicative Action in World Politics,” International Organization 54: 1–40Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean Jacques 1984. The Basic Political Writings. Translated by Cress, Donald. Hackett.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean Jacques 1986. Political Writings. Translated by Watkins, Frederick. The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Ruggie, John Gerard 1982. “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order,” International Organization 36: 379–415.Google Scholar

Ruggie, John Gerard 1983. “Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis,” World Politics 35: 261–285.Google Scholar

Ruggie, John Gerard 1992. “Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an Institution,” International Organization 46: 561–598.Google Scholar

Ruggie, John Gerard 1993. “Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations,” International Organization 47: 139–174.Google Scholar

Ruggie, John Gerard 1998. “What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge,” International Organization 52: 855–885.Google Scholar

Ruggie, John Gerard, ed. 1993. Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Salter, Mark 2008. “When the Exception Becomes the Rule: Borders, Sovereignty, and Citizenship,” Citizenship Studies 12: 365–380.Google Scholar

Sand, Peter 2004. “Sovereignty Bounded: Public Trusteeship for Common Pool Resources?” Global Environmental Politics 4: 47–71.Google Scholar

Sasley, Brent 2011. “Theorizing States’ Emotions,” International Studies Review 13: 452–476.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl 2005. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Translated by Schwab, George. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Schroeder, Paul 1994. The Transformation of European Politics, 1763–1848. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Scott, Gary and Carr, Craig 1996. “Multilateral Treaties and the Formation of Customary International Law,” Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 25: 71.Google Scholar

Seligson, Mitchell 2002. “The Impact of Corruption on Regime Legitimacy: A Comparative Study of Four Latin American Countries,” The Journal of Politics 64: 408–433.Google Scholar

Selin, Henrik 2010. Global Governance of Hazardous Chemicals: Challenges of Multilevel Management. The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Sending, Ole Jacob, Pouliot, Vincent, and Neumann, Iver B. 2011. “The Future of Diplomacy: Changing Practices, Evolving Relationships,” International Journal 66: 527–542.Google Scholar

Shaffer, Gregory 2012. “International Law and Global Public Goods in a Legal Pluralist World,” European Journal of International Law 23: 669–693.Google Scholar

Sikkink, Kathryn 1993. “Human Rights, Principled Issue-Networks, and Sovereignty in Latin America,” International Organization 47: 411–441.Google Scholar

Simmons, Beth 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Simpson, Audra 2008. “Subjects of Sovereignty: Indigeneity, the Revenue Rule, and Juridics of Failed Consent,” Law & Contemporary Problems 71: 191.Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie 1997. “The Real New World Order,” Foreign Affairs 76: 183–197.Google Scholar

Small, Melvin and Singer, J. David 1982. Resort to Arms: International and Civil Wars, 1816–1980. Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Smith, Anthony 1983. Theories of Nationalism. Holmes & Meier.Google Scholar

Snidal, Duncan 1985. “The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory,” International Organization 39: 579–614.Google Scholar

Spruyt, Hendrik 1996. The Sovereign State and Its Competitors: An Analysis of Systems Change. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Srivastava, Swati 2019. “Varieties of Social Construction,” International Studies Review 22: 325–346. doi.org/10.1093/isr/viz003.Google Scholar

Srivastava, Swati forthcoming, Hybrid Sovereignty in World Politics (manuscript under review).Google Scholar

Steele, Brent 2008. Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-Identity and the IR State. Routledge.Google Scholar

Strang, David 1991. “Anomaly and Commonplace in European Political Expansion: Realist and Institutional Accounts,” International Organization 45: 143–162.Google Scholar

Strang, David 1996. “Contested Sovereignty: The Social Construction of Colonial Imperialism,” in Biersteker, Thomas and Weber, Cynthia, eds. State Sovereignty as a Social Construct. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Strange, Susan 1996. The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Straumann, Benjamin 2008. “The Peace of Westphalia (1648) as a Secular Constitution,” Constellations 15: 173–188.Google Scholar

Talmon, Stefan 1999. “Who Is a Legitimate Government in Exile? Towards Normative Criteria for Governmental Legitimacy in International Law,” in Goodwin-Gill, Guy and Talmon, Stefan, eds. The Reality of International Law: Essays in Honour of Ian Brownlie. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, A. J. P. 1954. The Struggle for Mastery in Europe, 1848–1918. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, A. J. P. 1961. The Origins of the Second World War. Hamilton Press.Google Scholar

Telegraph 2016. “EU debate: Boris Johnson says Brexit will be ‘Britain’s Independence Day’ as Ruth Davidson Attacks ‘Lies’ of Leave Campaign in front of 6,000-strong Wembley Audience,” The Telegraph, June 21.Google Scholar

Temperley, Harold 1966. The Foreign Policy of Canning, 1822–1827: England, the Neo-Holy Alliance, and the New World. Archon Books.Google Scholar

Teschke, Benno 1998. “Geopolitical Relations in the European Middle Ages: History and Theory,” International Organization 52: 325–358.Google Scholar

Thomas, Daniel 2001. The Helsinki Effect: International Norms, Human Rights, and the Demise of Communism. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Thomson, Janice 1995. “State Sovereignty in International Relations: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Empirical Research,” International Studies Quarterly 39: 213–233.Google Scholar

Thomson, Janice 1996. Mercenaries, Pirates, and Sovereigns: State-Building and Extraterritorial Violence in Early Modern Europe. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Tilly, Charles 1985. “War Making and State Making as Organized Crime,” in Evans, Peter, Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda, eds. Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tilly, Charles 1992. Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1992. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Treaty of Münster 1648. Peace Treaty Between the Holy Roman Emperor and the King of France and their Respective Allies. British Foreign Office Translation. Viewed at The Avalon Project, Yale Law School, https://avalon.law.yale.edu/17th_century/westphal.asp.Google Scholar

United Nations 1945. Charter of the United Nations. Viewed at www.un.org/en/charter-united-nations/.Google Scholar

United Nations General Assembly 1948. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. United Nations 217 (III).Google Scholar

United Nations General Assembly 1995. Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 Relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks. United Nations A/CONF.164/37.Google Scholar

United Nations General Assembly 1998. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. United Nations A/CONF.183/9.Google Scholar

United Nations General Assembly 2005. 2005 World Summit Outcome. United Nations A/RES/60/1.Google Scholar

United Nations General Assembly 2012. Status of Palestine in the United Nations, United Nations A/67/L.28.Google Scholar

United Nations Security Council 1991. Resolution 687, United Nations S/RES/687.Google Scholar

Vattel, Emer de 2001 (1834). The Law of Nations or, the Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and to the Affairs of Nations and of Sovereigns, Chitty, Jospeh, ed. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Vernon, Raymond 1971. Sovereignty at Bay: The Multinational Spread of U.S. Enterprises. Basic Books.Google Scholar

Vernon, Raymond 1981. “Sovereignty at Bay Ten Years After,” International Organization 35: 517–529.Google Scholar

Vincent, R. J. 1986. Human Rights and International Relations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Vorhölter, Julia 2012. “Negotiating Social Change: Ugandan Discourses on Westernisation and Neo-Colonialism as Forms of Social Critique,” The Journal of Modern African Studies 50: 283–307.Google Scholar

Walker, R. B. J. 1993. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Waltz, Kenneth 1979. Theory of International Politics. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Weber, Martin 2001. “Competing Political Visions: WTO Governance and Green Politics,” Global Environmental Politics 1: 92–113.Google Scholar

Weber, Max 1968. Economy and Society. University of California Press.Google Scholar

Sir Webster, Charles 1931. The Foreign Policy of Castlereagh, 1812–1815: Britain and the Reconstruction of Europe. G. Bell and Sons.Google Scholar

Sir Webster, Charles 1934. The Congress of Vienna, 1814–1815. Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar

Wendt, Alexander 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wendt, Alexander 2004. “The State as Person in International Theory,” Review of International Studies 30: 289–316.Google Scholar

Wiessner, Siegfried 2008. “Indigenous Sovereignty: A Reassessment in Light of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People,” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 41: 1141.Google Scholar

Wight, Martin 1972. “International Legitimacy,” International Relations 4: 1–28.Google Scholar

Wight, Martin 1977. Systems of States. Leicester University Press.Google Scholar

Wilson, Charles 1967. “Trade, Society, and the State,” in Rich, Edwin and Wilson, Charles, eds. The Cambridge Economic History of Europe, Vol. IV: The Economy of Expanding Europe in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wilson, Charles 1968. The Dutch Republic and the Civilization of the Seventeenth Century. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar