Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of maps
- List of tables
- Preface
- List of abbreviations
- Note on transliteration of Russian words
- INTRODUCTION
- 1 From intervention to disengagement: a framework
- PART I MOTIVATIONAL ASPECTS
- PART II THE HORN OF OPPORTUNITY
- CONCLUSION
- Appendix A Soviet–Somali treaty of 11 July 1974
- Appendix B Soviet–Ethiopian treaty of 20 November 1978
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
- Soviet and East European Studies
1 - From intervention to disengagement: a framework
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 January 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of maps
- List of tables
- Preface
- List of abbreviations
- Note on transliteration of Russian words
- INTRODUCTION
- 1 From intervention to disengagement: a framework
- PART I MOTIVATIONAL ASPECTS
- PART II THE HORN OF OPPORTUNITY
- CONCLUSION
- Appendix A Soviet–Somali treaty of 11 July 1974
- Appendix B Soviet–Ethiopian treaty of 20 November 1978
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
- Soviet and East European Studies
Summary
Intervention is a very central and a very old subject in the study of international relations, and there is a sense in which there is nothing new that can be said about it. But at the same time it is one of those subjects which we have constantly to reassess, in relation to changing circumstances: the underlying questions may be the same, but they keep arising in new forms.
(Preface in Hedley Bull, ed. Intervention in World Politics, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1984)The last decade has reaffirmed that intervention and its close relative, disengagement, remain both important and very topical issues in international politics. A couple of examples will suffice. In January 1979, the Vietnamese army entered Kampuchea and overthrew the Pol Pot regime. At the end of the same year, Soviet troops crossed the border into Afghanistan and deposed the government of President Hafizullah Amin. Both Vietnam and the USSR denied they had intervened. The Vietnamese claimed they were ‘liberating’ the Kampuchean people from a tyrannical government, whilst the Soviets said they had simply responded to a repeated request for military assistance against ‘armed intervention by imperialist forces’. Now, nearly a decade later, Vietnam and the USSR have begun the process of extricating themselves from these military entanglements. In June 1988, Hanoi announced its intention to withdraw all its 100,000-strong troop contingent from Kampuchea by 1990. Meanwhile, the USSR, under the terms of a UN-mediated accord signed on 15 April 1988, had withdrawn all 115,000 of its troops from Afghanistan by February 1989.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Soviet Union in the Horn of AfricaThe Diplomacy of Intervention and Disengagement, pp. 3 - 22Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1990