Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T11:17:14.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Progressive levels of trait divergence along a ‘speciation transect’ in the Lake Victoria cichlid fish Pundamilia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Ole Seehausen
Edited by
Roger Butlin ,
Jon Bridle  and
Dolph Schluter
Ole Seehausen
Affiliation:
Centre of Ecology, Evolution and Biogeochemistry, EAWAG
Roger Butlin
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Jon Bridle
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Dolph Schluter
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Get access

Summary

Introduction and outline

Identifying mechanisms of speciation has proven one of the most challenging problems in evolutionary biology, perhaps mainly for two reasons, speciation is not readily accessible to experimental approaches, and rarely to time series analyses. Any one case of speciation can usually be investigated only at a single stage of completion. Cases of parallel ecological speciation driven repeatedly within the same taxon by divergent selection along replicate environmental gradients, have therefore received considerable attention (Schluter & Nagel 1995; Rundle et al. 2000). Several such systems have become major model systems in evolutionary ecology research, including sticklebacks in postglacial lakes (Rundle et al. 2000), Heliconius butterflies (Mallet et al. 1998), leaf beetles (Funk 1998) and Timema walking sticks (Nosil et al. 2002). They provide powerful means of identifying causes of divergence and may lend themselves to examining associations between variation in the environments and variation in the progress towards speciation (Nosil & Harmon, this volume). However, variation in the progress towards speciation among disconnected populations undergoing parallel speciation may be due to different contingency as much as different environments (Taylor & McPhail 2000). Ideally, to trace the correlates of the transition from panmixis to incipient speciation, one would want to study variation in the progress towards speciation in exactly the same pair of species, and along a continuous progress series, to minimize the potential confounding effect of variable historical contingency.

Type
Chapter
Information
Speciation and Patterns of Diversity , pp. 155 - 176
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bridle, J. R., Saldamando, C. I., Koning, W. and Butlin, R. K. (2006) Assortative preferences and discrimination by females against hybrid male song in the grasshoppers Corthippus brunneus and C. jacobsi (Orthoptera, Acrididae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19, 1248–1256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boughman, J. W. (2001) Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks. Nature 411, 944–948.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boughman, J. W. (2002) How sensory drive can promote speciation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17, 571–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butlin, R. (1987) Speciation by reinforcement. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2, 8–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carleton, K. L., Parry, J. W. L., Bowmaker, J. K., Hunt, D. M. and Seehausen, O. (2005) Color vision and speciation in Lake Victoria cichlids of the genus Pundamilia. Molecular Ecology 14, 4341–4353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castle, W. E. (1921) An improved method of estimating the number of genetic factors concerned in cases of blending inheritance. Science 54, 223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coyne, J. A. and Orr, H. A. (1997) ‘Patterns of speciation in Drosophila’ revisited. Evolution 51, 295–303.Google Scholar
Coyne, J. A. and Orr, H. A. (2004) Speciation. Sinauer associates, Sunderland.
Crapon de Caprona, M. D. and Fritysch, B. (1984) Interspecific fertile hybrids of haplochromine Cichlidae (Teleostei) and their possible importance for specification. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 34, 503–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dieckmann, U., Metz, J. A. J., Doebeli, M. and Tautz, D. (eds) (2004) Adaptive Speciation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.CrossRef
Dijkstra, P. D., Seehausen, O. and Groothuis, T. G. G. (2005) Direct male-male competition can facilitate invasion of new colour types in Lake Victoria cichlids. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 58, 136–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, P. D., Seehausen, O., Pierotti, M. E. R. and Groothuis, T. G. G. (2007a) Male–male competition and speciation, aggression bias towards differently coloured rivals varies between stages of speciation in a Lake Victoria cichlids species complex. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20, 496–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, P. D., Hekman, R., Schulz, R. W. and Groothuis, T. G. G. (2007b) Social stimulation, nuptial colouration, androgens and immunocompetence in a sexual dimorphic cichlid fish. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 61, 599–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, P. D., Hemelrijk, C., Seehausen, O. and Groothuis, T. G. G. (in press) Colour polymorphism and intrasexual competition in assemblages of cichlid fish. Behavioural Ecology.
Dijkstra, P. D., Seehausen, O., Gricar, B. L. A., Maan, M. E. and Groothuis, T. G. G. (2006) Can male-male competition stabilize speciation? A test in Lake Victoria haplochromine cichlid fish. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 59, 704–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. (1937) Genetics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. (1940) Speciation as a stage in evolutionary divergence. American Naturalist 74, 312–321.Google Scholar
Edelaar, P., Doorn, G. S. and Weissing, F. J. (2004) Sexual selection on good genes facilitates sympatric speciation. In: Sexual Selection and Sympatric Speciation, PhD Thesis of G. S. van Doorn, pp. 205–210, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Endler, J. A. (1992) Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. American Naturalist 139, S125–S153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funk, D. J. (1998) Isolating a role for natural selection in speciation, Host adaptation and sexual isolation in Neochlamisus bebbianae leaf beetles. Evolution 52, 1744–1759.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gavrilets, S. (2004) Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Graham, M. M. A. (1929) The Victoria Nyanza and its fisheries. A report on the fishing survey of Lake Victoria 1927–28, and appendices. Crown Agents, London.
Haesler, M. and Seehausen, O. (2005) The inheritance of female mating preference in a sympatric sibling species pair of Lake Victoria cichlids, implications for speciation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 272, 237–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, A. P., Taylor, E. B. and McPhail, J. D. (2002) Adapative divergence and the balance between selection and gene flow, lake and stream stickleback in the Misty system. Evolution 56, 1199–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, M. (2001) Reinforcement during ecological speciation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 268, 1259–1263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkpatrick, M. and Nuismer, S. L. (2004) Sexual selection can constrain sympatric speciation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 271, 687–693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkpatrick, M. and Ravigné, V. (2002). Speciation by natural and sexual selection, models and experiments. American Naturalist 159, S22–S35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kondrashov, A. S. and Kondrashov, F. A. (1999) Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation. Nature 400, 351–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lande, R. (1981) The minimum number of genes contributing to quantitative variation between and within populations. Genetics 99, 541–553.Google ScholarPubMed
Lande, R., Seehausen, O. and Alphen, J. J. M. (2001) Rapid sympatric speciation by sex reversal and sexual selection in cichlid fish. Genetica 112–113, 435–443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maan, M. E. (2006) Sexual selection and speciation, mechanisms in Lake Victoria cichlid fish. PhD Thesis, Leiden. ISBN-10 90.9020523.3; ISBN-13 978.90.9030523.6
Maan, M. E., Haesler, M. P., Seehausen, O. and Alphen, J. J. M. (2006c) Heritability and heterochrony of polychromatism in a Lake Victoria cichlid fish, stepping stones for speciation?Journal of Experimental Zoology. Molecular and Developmental Evolution 306B, 168–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maan, M. E., Hofker, K. D., Alphen, J. J. M. and Seehausen, O. (2006b) Sensory drive in cichlid speciation. The American Naturalist 167, 947–954.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maan, M. E., Rooijen, A. M. C., Alphen, J. J. M. and Seehausen, O. (2008) Parasite-mediated sexual selection and species divergence in Lake Victoria cichlid fish. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 94, 53–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maan, M. E., Spoel, M., Quesada Jimenez, P., Alphen, J. J. M. and Seehausen, O. (2006a) Fitness correlates of male coloration in a Lake Victoria cichlid fish. Behavioural Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/ark020.CrossRef
Maan, M., Seehausen, O., Söderberg, L., et al. (2004) Intraspecific sexual selection on a speciation trait, male coloration, in the Lake Victoria cichlid Pundamilia nyererei. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 271, 2445–2452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magalhaes, I. S., Mwaiko, S., Schneider, M. V. and Seehausen, O. (in press). Divergent selection and phenotypic plasticity during speciation in Lake Victoria cichlid fish. Journal of Evolutionary Biology.
Mallet, J., Jiggins, C. D. and McMillan, W. O. (1998) Mimicry and warning colour at the boundary between races and species. In: Endless Forms, Species and Speciation (ed. Howard, D. J. and Berlocher, S. H.), pp. 390–403. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Mikami, O. K., Kohda, M. and Kawata, M. (2004) A new hypothesis for species co-existence, male–male repulsion promotes co-existence of competing species. Population Ecology. 46, 213–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, H. J. (1939) Reversibility in evolution considered from the standpoint of genetics. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 14, 261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nosil, P. and Crespi, B. J. (2004) Does gene flow constrain adaptive divergence or vice versa? A test using ecomorphology and sexual isolation in Timema cristinae walking sticks. Evolution 58, 102–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nosil, P. and Harmon, L. (2008) Niche Dimensionality and Ecological Speciation. This volume.
Nosil, P., Crespi, B. J. and Sandoval, C. P. (2002) Host-plant adaptation drives the parallel evolution of reproductive isolation. Nature 417, 440–443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinhold, K. (2004) Modeling a version of the good-genes hypothesis, female choice of locally adapted males. Organisms Diversity & Evolution 4, 157–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenzweig, M. L. (1978) Competitive speciation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 10, 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rundle, H. D., Nagel, L., Wenrick Boughman, J. and Schluter, D. (2000) Natural Selection and parallel speciation in sympatric sticklebacks. Science 287, 306–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schluter, D. and Nagel, L. (1995) Parallel speciation by natural selection. American Naturalist 146, 292–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, P. (2003) Deep time landscape histories and the improvement of environmental management in Africa. In: Conservation, Ecology, and Management of African Freshwaters (ed. Crisman, T. L., Chapman, L. J., Chapman, C. A. and Kaufman, L. S.), pp. 20–37. University Press of Florida, Florida.Google Scholar
Seehausen, O. (1996) Lake Victoria Rock Cichlids, Taxonomy, Ecology, and Distribution, p. 304. Verduijn Cichlids, Zevenhuizen, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Seehausen, O. (1997) Distribution of and reproductive isolation among color morphs of a rock dwelling Lake Victoria cichlid. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 6, 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seehausen, O. (1999) Speciation and species richness in African cichlid fish, the role of sexual selection. University of Leiden, Netherlands. ISBN 90–9012711–9.
Seehausen, O. (2006) African cichlid fish, a model system in adaptive radiation research. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3539.CrossRef
Seehausen, O. and Schluter, D. (2004) Male–male competition and nuptial-colour displacement as a diversifying force in lake Victoria cichlid fishes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 271, 1345–1353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seehausen, O. and Alphen, J. J. M. (1998) The effect of male coloration on female mate choice in closely related Lake Victoria cichlids (Haplochromis nyererei complex). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 42, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seehausen, O. and Alphen, J. J. M. (1999) Can sympatric speciation by disruptive sexual selection explain rapid evolution of cichlid diversity in Lake Victoria?Ecology Letters 2, 262–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seehausen, O., Alphen, J. J. M. and Lande, R. (1999) Colour polymorphism and sex ratio distortion in a cichlid fish as an incipient stage in sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Ecology Letters 2, 367–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seehausen, O., Alphen, J. J. M. and Witte, F. (1997) Cichlid fish diversity threatened by eutrophication that curbs sexual selection. Science 277, 1808–1811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seehausen, O., Lippitsch, E., Bouton, N. and Zwennes, H. (1998a) Mbipi, the rock-dwelling cichlids of Lake Victoria, description of three new genera and fifteen new species (Teleostei). Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters 9, 129–228.Google Scholar
Seehausen, O., Witte, F., Alphen, J. J. M. and Bouton, N. (1998b) Direct mate choice maintains diversity among sympatric cichlids in Lake Victoria. Journal of Fish Biology 53 (Suppl. A), 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seehausen, O., Terai, Y., Magalhaes, I. S., et al. (2008) Speciation through sensory drive in cichlid fish. Nature, In press.
Spady, T. C., Parry, J. W. L. and Robinson, P. R. (2003) Evolution of the cichlid visual palette through ontogenetic subfunctionalization of the opsin gene array. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23, 1538–1547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stager, J. C. and Johnson, T. C. (2008) The Late Pleistocene desiccation of Lake Victoria and the origin of its endemic biota. Hydrobiologia 596, 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stelkens, R. B., Pierotti, M. E. R., Joyce, D. A., et al. (2008) Disruptive sexual selection on male nuptial colouration in an experimental hybrid population of cichlid fish. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0049.CrossRef
Taylor, E. B. and McPhail, J. D. (2000) Historical contingency and ecological determinism interact to prime speciation in sticklebacks, Gasterosteus. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 267, 2375–2384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, E. B., Boughman, J. W., Groenenboom, M., et al. (2006) Speciation in reverse, morphological and genetic evidence of the collapse of a three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) species pair. Molecular Ecology 15, 343–355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terai, Y., Seehausen, O., Sasaki, T., et al. (2006) Divergent selection on opsins drives incipient speciation in Lake Victoria cichlids. PloS Biology 4, e433–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, G. F., Seehausen, O., Knight, M. E., Allender, C. J. and Robinson, R. L. (2001) How many species of cichlid fishes are there in African lakes?Molecular Ecology 10, 793–806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sluijs, I. (2008) Divergent mating preferences and nuptial coloration in sibling species of cichlid fish. University of Leiden, Netherlands. ISBN 978-90-90-9023197-6.
Sluijs, I., Alphen, J. J. M. and Seehausen, O. (2008a) Preference polymorphism for coloration but no speciation in a population of Lake Victoria cichlids. Behavioral Ecology 19, 177–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sluijs, I., Dooren, T. J. M., Seehausen, O. and Alphen, J. J. M. (2008b). A test of fitness consequences of hybridization in sibling species of Lake Victoria cichlid fish. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21, 480–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sluijs, I., Dooren, T. J. M., Hofker, K. D., et al. Female mating preference functions predict sexual selection against hybrids between sibling species of cichlid fish. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0045.CrossRef
Doorn, G. S., Dieckmann, U. and Weissing, F. J., (2004) Sympatric speciation by sexual selection: a critical reevaluation. American Naturalist 163, 709–725.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verzijden, M. N. and ten Cate, C. (2007) Early learning influences species assortative mating preferences in Lake Victoria cichlid fish. Biology Letters, doi:10.1098/rsbl.2006.0601CrossRef
Wilson, E. O. (1965) The challenge from related species. In: The Genetics of Colonizing Species (ed. Baker, H. G. and Stebbins, G. L.), 7–24. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1968) Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, vol. 1. University of Chicago Press, London.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×