Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T23:31:01.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Linnaeus and the naturalists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2011

Richard A. Richards
Richard A. Richards
Affiliation:
University of Alabama
Get access

Summary

THE ESSENTIALISM STORY REDUX

Those who understand Aristotle's project to be an essentialist system that classified organisms into unchanging species kinds on the basis of essential properties typically see a similar essentialism in many pre-Darwinian naturalists. In a passage quoted at the beginning of the previous chapter, Daniel Dennett claims that: “The taxonomy of living things that Darwin inherited was thus a direct descendant, via Aristotle, of Plato's essences” (Dennett 1995: 36). Here Dennett seems to be implying that, from Aristotle to Darwin, the property essentialism of the Essentialism Story was pervasive and predominant. Marc Ereshefsky describes this standard view:

[T]he common philosophical stance towards species was essentialism. Linnaeus, John Ray, Maupertuis, Bonnet, Lamarck, and Lyell all adopted an essentialist (or typological) view toward systematics … On this view, classification systems highlight natural kinds – groups whose members share kind-specific essences …According to biologists who adopted an essentialist view of species, species have the same role in biological taxonomy as the chemical elements have on the periodic table. All and only the members of a species taxon should have a common essential property.

(Ereshefsky 1992: 188–189)

Of the group mentioned by Ereshefsky, the Swedish botanist Carolus Linnaeus is perhaps the most prominent and is specifically seen as working in this essentialist tradition. Typically Linnaeus is also taken to have adopted Aristotle's method of division.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Species Problem
A Philosophical Analysis
 , pp. 49 - 77
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×