Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T00:51:17.957Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - What Makes Good Teachers Great?

The Artful Balance of Structure and Improvisation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

R. Keith Sawyer
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Get access

Summary

In the 1970s and 1980s, educational researchers began to study what makes good teachers great. One common approach of these early researchers was to compare experienced teachers with novice teachers; they found that experienced teachers have a greater repertoire of scripts than novice teachers – standard sequences of activities, or responses to students, that work in specific situations. Researchers also found, however, that experienced teachers were better at improvising in response to each class’s unique flow; in fact, they tended to spend less advance time planning than novice teachers (Berliner & Tikunoff, 1976; Borko & Livingston, 1989; Yinger, 1987). Experienced teachers do two apparently contradictory things: They use more structures, and yet they improvise more.

These early studies of teacher expertise focused on the structures that teachers created themselves, as ways to enhance teaching, manage classrooms, and handle problems that may arise. In addition, many of the structures that guide teaching are mandated by law, administration, or state and federal guidelines. Modern schools are complex organizations, with relatively rigid structures and bureaucratic and administrative frameworks that constrain what teachers can do in classrooms (Olson, 2003).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Azmitia, M. (1996). Peer interactive minds: Developmental, theoretical, and methodological issues. In Baltes, P. B. & Staudinger, U. M. (Eds.), Interactive Minds: Life-span Perspectives on the Social Foundation of Cognition (pp. 133–162). New York: Cambridge.Google Scholar
Barrell, B. (1991). Classroom artistry. The Educational Forum, 55, 333–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Berliner, D. C. (1986). In pursuit of the expert pedagogue. Educational Researcher, 15(7), 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berliner, D. C. (1987). Ways of thinking about students and classrooms by more and less experienced teachers. In Calderhead, J. (Ed.), Exploring Teachers’ Thinking (pp. 60–83). London: Cassell Education Limited.Google Scholar
Berliner, D. C. & Tikunoff, W. J. (1976). The California beginning teacher study. Journal of Teacher Education, 27(1), 24–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berliner, P. (1994). Thinking in jazz: The infinite art of improvisation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boote, D. N. (2004). Teachers’ professional discretion and the curricula. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association. Retrieved.
Borko, H. & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 473–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1972/1977). Outline of a theory of practice. New York: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. Originally published as Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique (Genève: Droz, 1972).Google Scholar
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Brown, M. & Edelson, D. C. (2001). Teaching by design: Curriculum design as a lens on instructional practice. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, Seattle, WA.
Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Clark, C. M. & Yinger, R. J. (1977). Research on teacher thinking. Curriculum Inquiry, 7(4), 279–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochrane-Smith, M. & Lytle, S. L. (1999). The teacher research movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craft, A., Jeffrey, B., & Leibling, M. (Eds.). (2001). Creativity in education. London: Continuum.
Cremin, T., Burnard, P., & Craft, A. (2006). Pedagogy and possibility thinking in the early years. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1, 108–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Dawe, H. A. (1984). Teaching: A performing art. Phi Delta Kappan, 548–552.Google Scholar
de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (Original work published 1980).Google Scholar
Eisner, E. W. (1979). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Eisner, E. W. (1983). The art and craft of teaching. Educational Leadership, 40(4), 4–13.Google Scholar
Erickson, F. (1982). Classroom discourse as improvisation: Relationships between academic task structure and social participation structure in lessons. In Wilkinson, L. C. (Ed.), Communicating in the Classroom (pp. 153–181). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Erickson, F. (2004). Talk and social theory: Ecologies of speaking and listening in everyday life. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.). (2006). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Gardner, H. (2007). Five minds for the future. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Haworth, L. (1986). Autonomy: An essay in philosophical psychology and ethics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, J. C. (1985). The teacher as artist: A case for peripheral supervision. The Educational Forum, 49(2), 183–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Housner, L. D. & Griffey, D. C. (1985). Teacher cognition: Differences in planning and interactive decision making between experienced and inexperienced teachers. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 56(1), 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingersoll, R. M. (2003). Who controls teachers’ work? Power and accountability in America’s schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Joubert, M. M. (2001). The art of creative teaching: NACCCE and beyond. In Craft, A., Jeffrey, B. & Leibling, M. (Eds.), Creativity in Education (pp. 17–34). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Leinhardt, G. & Greeno, J. G. (1986). The cognitive skill of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 75–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLaren, P. (1986). Schooling as a ritual performance: Towards a political economy of educational symbols and gestures. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education (NACCCE) (1999). All our futures: Creativity, culture and education. London: DFEE.Google Scholar
O’Day, J. (2008). Standards-based reform: Promises, pitfalls, and potential lessons from the U.S. In Böttcher, W., Bos, W., Döbert, H. & Holtappels, H. G. n. (Eds.), Bidungsmonitoring und Bildungscontrolling in nationaler und internationaler Perspektive (pp. 107–127). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Olson, D. R. (2003). Psychological theory and educational reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. In Spence, J. T., Darley, J. M. & Foss, D. J. (Eds.), Annual Review of Psychology (Vol. 49, pp. 345–375). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.Google Scholar
Park-Fuller, L. (1991). Learning to stage a learning experience: The teacher as director. Paper presented at the National Convention of the Speech Communication Association, November, Atlanta, GA.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2007). The intellectual and policy foundations of the 21st century skills framework. Tucson, AZ: Partnership for 21st Century Skills.Google Scholar
Pineau, E. L. (1994). Teaching is performance: Reconceptualizing a problematic metaphor. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA) (2005). Creativity: Find it, promote, promoting pupils’ creative thinking and behaviour across the curriculum at key stages 1 and 2, practical materials for schools. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process. In Kuhn, D. & Siegler, R. S. (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology, 5th edition, Volume 2: Cognition, Perception, and Language (pp. 679–744). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rubin, L. J. (1983). Artistry in teaching. Educational Leadership, 40(4), 44–49.Google Scholar
Rubin, L. J. (1985). Artistry in teaching. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Sarason, S. B. (1999). Teaching as a performing art. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2001). Creating conversations: Improvisation in everyday discourse. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2003). Improvised dialogues: Emergence and creativity in conversation. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.). (2006a). Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2006b). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2006c). Group creativity: Musical performance and collaboration. Psychology of Music, 34(2), 148–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2006d). The new science of learning. In Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 1–16). New York: Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Shavelson, R. J. (1986). Interactive decision making: Some thoughts on teacher cognition. Paper presented at the Invited address, I Congreso Internacional, “Pensamientos de los Profesores y Toma de Decisiones.” Retrieved.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. A. (1979). Is teaching really a performing art?Contemporary Education, 51(1), 31–35.Google Scholar
Timpson, W. M. & Tobin, D. N. (1982). Teaching as performing: A guide to energizing your public presentation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (2008). The Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P., Bruch, C. B., & Torrance, J. P. (1976). Interscholastic futuristic creative problem solving. Journal of Creative Behavior, 10, 117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trilling, B. & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Yinger, R. J. (1979). Routines in teacher planning. Theory into Practice, 18(3), 163–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yinger, R. J. (1980). A study of teacher planning. The Elementary School Journal, 80(3), 107–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yinger, R. J. (1987). By the seat of your pants: An inquiry into improvisation and teaching. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, Washington, DC.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×