References
Adler, P. S. & Heckscher, C. (2006). Towards collaborative community. In Adler, P. S. & Heckscher, C. (Eds.), The firm as a collaborative community: Reconstructing trust in the knowledge economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ahonen, H. (2008). Oppimisen kohteen ja oppijan vastavuoroinen kehitys: Teleyrityksen asiakaspalvelun työyhteisöjen oppimiskäytäntöjen uudistaminen osana teknologis-taloudellista kumousta [Reciprocal development of the object and subject of learning: The renewal of the learning practices of front-line communities in a telecommunications company as part of the techno-economical paradigm change]. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Education (in Finnish).
Ahonen, H. & Virkkunen, J. (2003). Shared challenge for learning: Dialogue between management and front-line workers in knowledge management. International Journal of Information Technology and Management, 2(1–2), 59–84.
van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenny, S. & Mieveen, N. (Eds.) (2006). Educational design research. London: Routledge.
Ally, M. (2008). Nomadicity and information access: The mobile digital library for people on the move. In Needham, G. & Ally, M. (Eds.), M-libraries: Libraries on the move to provide virtual access. London: Facet Publishing (pp. 37–46).
Argyris, C. & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Argyris, C. & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning 2: Theory, method, and practice. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Arievitch, I. (2004). An integrated view of development and learning: Galperin’s contribution to sociocultural psychology. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 10, 278–288.
Arievitch, I. & Haenen, J. (2005). Connecting sociocultural theory and educational practice: Galperin’s approach. Educational Psychologist, 40(3), 155–165.
Avis, J. (2007). Engeström’s version of activity theory: A conservative praxis? Journal of Education and Work, 20(3), 161–177.
Bäckström, Å. (2005). Spår: Om brädsportkultur, informella läroprocesser och identitet. Stockholm: HLS Förlag.
Baethge, M., Kitay, J. & Regalia, I. (1999). Managerial strategies, human resource practices, and labor relations in banks: A comparative view. In Regini, M., Kitay, J. & Baethge, M. (Eds.), From tellers to sellers: Changing employment relations in banks. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Baker, A. C., Jensen, P. J. & Kolb, D. A. (2002). Conversational learning: An experiential approach to knowledge creation. Westport: Quorum Books.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1982). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bakhurst, D. (1991). Consciousness and revolution in Soviet philosophy: From the Bolsheviks to Evald Ilyenkov. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bannan-Ritland, B. (2003). The role of design in research: The integrative learning design framework. Educational Researcher, 32, 21–24.
Barab, S. A. & Kirshner, D. (2001). Guest editors’ introduction: Rethinking methodology in the learning sciences. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 5–15.
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine Books.
Beal, B. (1995). Disqualifying the official: An exploration of social resistance in the subculture of skateboarding. Sociology of Sport Journal, 12(5), 252–267.
Beer, M. & Nohria, N. (Eds.) (2000). Breaking the code of change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., Kirshner, P. A. & Gijselaers, W. H. (2005). Computer support for knowledge construction in collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 623–643.
Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bodrozic, Z. (2008). Post-industrial intervention: An activity-theoretical expedition tracing the proximal development of forms of conducting interventions. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Education.
Boedker, S. & Andersen, P. B. (2005). Complex mediation. Human-Computer Interaction, 20, 353–402.
Borden, I. (2001). Skateboarding, space and the city: Architecture and the body. Oxford: Berg.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L. & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.) (2003). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical, and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141–168.
Brown, S. L. & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1998). Competing on the edge: Strategy as structured chaos. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Bruner, J. S. (1964). The course of cognitive growth. American Psychologist, 19, 1–15.
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. S. (1974). Beyond the information given: Studies in the psychology of knowing. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Burke, G. & Peppard, J. (Eds.) (1995). Examining business process re-engineering: Current perspectives and research directions. London: Kogan Page.
Carroll, J. S. & Edmondson, A. C. (2002). Leading organizational learning in health care. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 11(1), 51–55.
Cendán, J. & Good, M. (2006). Interdisciplinary work flow assessment and redesign decreases operating room turnover time and allows for additional caseload. Archives of Surgery, 141(1), 65–69.
Ciborra, C. (2000). From control to drift: The dynamics of corporate information infrastructures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R. & Schauble, L. (2003a). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32, 9–13.
Cobb, P., McClain, K., de Silva Lamberg, T. & Dean, C. (2003b). Situating teachers’ instructional practices in the institutional setting of the school and district. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 13–24.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Cole, M. & Engeström, Y. (2007). Cultural-historical approaches to designing for development. In Valsiner, J. & Rosa, A. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (pp. 484–507).
Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In Scanlon, E. & O’Shea, T. (Eds.), New directions in educational technology. Berlin: Springer.
Collins, A., Joseph, D. & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 15–42.
Collins, H. (2010). Tacit and explicit knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Cooper, M. (2008). Life as surplus: Biotechnology and capitalism in the neoliberal era. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Cooper, P. (2004). The gift of education: An anthropological perspective on the commoditization of learning. Anthropology Today, 20(6), 5–9.
Crossan, M. M. & Berdrow, I. (2003). Organizational learning and strategic renewal. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 1087–1105.
Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W. & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522–537.
Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Cummings, S. & Angwin, D. (2004). The future shape of strategy: Lemmings or chimeiras. Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 21–36.
Cussins, A. (1992). Content, embodiment and objectivity: The theory of cognitive trails. Mind, 101, 651–688.
Cussins, A. (1993). Nonconceptual content and the elimination of misconceived composites! Mind & Language, 8, 234–252.
Czarniawska, B. (1998). A narrative approach to organization studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
Czarniawska, B. (2004). Narratives in social science research. London: Sage Publications.
Daly, J. (2005), Evidence-based medicine and the search for a science of clinical care. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Daniels, H. (2004). Cultural historical activity theory and professional learning. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 51(2), 185–200.
Davenport, T. H. & Short, J. E. (1990). The new industrial engineering: Information technology and business process redesign. Sloan Management Review, 31(4), 11–27.
Davydov, V. V. (1988). Problems of developmental teaching: The experience of theoretical and experimental psychological research. Excerpts (Part II). Soviet Education, 30(9), 3–83.
Davydov, V. V. (1990). Types of generalization in instruction: Logical and psychological problems in the structuring of school curricula. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Davydov, V. V. (2008). Problems of developmental instruction: A theoretical and experimental psychological study. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., Entwistle, N. & van Merriënboer, J. (Eds.) (2003). Powerful learning environments: Unravelling basic components and dimensions. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Deeg, R. (2006). Change from within: German and Italian finance in the 1990s. In Streeck, W. & Thelen, K. (Eds.), Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Des Chene, M. (1997). Locating the past. In Gupta, A. & Ferguson, J. (Eds.), Anthropological locations: Boundaries and grounds of a field science. Berkeley: University of California Press (pp. 66–85).
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Capricorn Books.
Dierkes, M., Antal, A. B., Child, J. & Nonaka, I. (Eds.) (2001). Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge. Oxford. Oxford University Press.
Dixon, N. (1994). The organizational learning cycle: How we can learn collectively. London: McGraw-Hill.
Dochy, F., Engeström, Y., Sannino, A. & van Meeuwen, N. (2011). Interorganisational expansive learning at work. In Dochy, F., Gijbels, D., Segers, M. & Van den Bossche, P. (Eds.), Theories of learning for the workplace: Buiding blocks for training and professional development programs. London: Routledge (pp. 125–147).
Dodds, P. & Fletcher, J. D. (2004). Opportunities for new “smart” learning environments enabled by next-generation web capabilities. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13, 391–404.
Dodgson, M. (1991). The management of technological learning: Lessons from a biotechnology company. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Edmondson, A. (2004). Leaning from mistakes is easier said than done: Group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences, 40(1), 66–90.
Edwards, A. (2005). Let’s get beyond community and practice: The many meanings of learning by participating. The Curriculum Journal, 16(1), 49–65.
Edwards, A. (2009). From the systemic to the relational: Relational agency and activity theory. In Sannino, A., Daniels, H. & Gutiérrez, K. (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (pp. 197–211).
Edwards, K. Nielsen Paarup, A. & Jacobsen, P. (2009). Implementing lean in surgery: Lessons and implications. Paper presented at the Nordic Summer Symposium 2009: Does size matter? Benefits and Consequences of Centralizing in Health Care. May 25–29, Nordic School of Public Health, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Edwards, P. N. (1997). The closed world: Computers and the politics of discourse in cold war America. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (2000). Paradox, spirals, ambivalence: The new language of change and pluralism. The Academy of Management Review, 25, 703–706.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
Engeström, Y. (1989). The cultural-historical theory of activity and the study of political repression. International Journal of Mental Health, 17(4), 29–41.
Engeström, Y. (1990). Learning, working and imagining: Twelve studies in activity theory. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
Engeström, Y. (1991). Non scolae sed vitae discimus: Toward overcoming the encapsulation of school learning. Learning and Instruction, 1, 243–259.
Engeström, Y. (1995). Innovative organizational learning in medical and legal settings. In Martin, L. M. W., Nelson, K. & Tobach, E. (Eds.), Sociocultural psychology: Theory and practice of doing and knowing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (1996). Development as breaking away and opening up: A challenge to Vygotsky and Piaget. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 55, 126–132.
Engeström, Y. (1998). Reorganizing the motivational sphere of classroom culture: An activity-theoretical analysis of planning in a teacher team. In Seeger, F., Voigt, J. & Waschescio, U. (Eds.), The culture of the mathematics classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (pp. 76–103).
Engeström, Y. (1999a). Expansive visibilization of work: An activity-theoretical perspective. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8, 63–93.
Engeström, Y. (1999b). Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R. & Punamäki, R-L. (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (2000). From individual action to collective activity and back: Developmental work research as an interventionist methodology. In Luff, P., Hindmarsh, J. & Heath, C. (Eds.), Workplace studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (2001a). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.
Engeström, Y. (2001b). Making expansive decisions: An activity-theoretical study of practitioners building collaborative medical care for children. In Allwood, C. M. & Selart, M. (Eds.), Decision making: Social and creative dimensions. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Engeström, Y. (2003). The horizontal dimension of expansive learning: Weaving a texture of cognitive trails in the terrain of health care in Helsinki. In Achtenhagen, F. & John, E. G. (Eds.), Milestones of vocational and occupational education and Training. Volume 1: The teaching-learning perspective. Bielefeld: Bertelsmann.
Engeström, Y. (2004a). Managing as argumentative history-making. In Boland, R. J. Jr. & Collopy, F. (Eds.), Managing as designing. Stanford: Stanford Business Books.
Engeström, Y. (2004b). New forms of learning in co-configuration work. The Journal of Workplace Learning, 16, 11–21.
Engeström, Y. (2005). Developmental work research: Expanding activity theory in practice. Berlin: Lehmanns Media.
Engeström, Y. (2007a). Enriching the theory of expansive learning: Lessons from journeys toward coconfiguration. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 14(1–2), 23–39.
Engeström, Y. (2007b). From communities of practice to mycorrhizae. In Hughes, J., Jewson, N. & Unwin, L. (Eds.), Communities of practice: Critical perspectives. London: Routledge (pp. 41–54).
Engeström, Y. (2007c). From stabilization knowledge to possibility knowledge in organizational learning. Management Learning, 38, 271–275.
Engeström, Y. (2007d). Putting Vygotsky to work: The Change Laboratory as an application of double stimulation. In Daniels, H., Cole, M. & Wertsch, J. V. (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (pp. 363–382).
Engeström, Y. (2008a). Enriching activity theory without shortcuts. Interacting with Computers, 20, 256–259.
Engeström, Y. (2008b). From teams to knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (2009a). From learning environments and implementation to activity systems and expansive learning. Actio: An International Journal of Human Activity Theory, 2, 17–33.
Engeström, Y. (2009b). The future of activity theory: A rough draft. In Sannino, A., Daniels, H. & Gutiérrez, K. (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (pp. 303–328).
Engeström, Y. (2009c). Wildfire activities: New patterns of mobility and learning. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 1(2), 1–18.
Engeström, Y. (2011). From design experiments to formative interventions. Theory & Psychology, 21(5), 598–628.
Engeström, Y. & Ahonen, H. (2001). On the materiality of social capital: An activity-theoretical exploration. In Hasan, H., Gould, E., Larkin, P. & Vrazalic, L. (Eds.), Information systems and activity theory: Volume 2. Theory and practice. Wollongong: University of Wollongong Press (pp. 55–73).
Engeström, Y. & Blackler, F. (2005). On the life of the object. Organization, 12(3), 307–330.
Engeström, Y. Brown, K. Engeström, R. & Koistinen, K. (1990). Organizational forgetting: An activity theoretical perspective. In Middleton, D. & Edwards, D. (Eds.), Collective remembering. London: Sage.
Engeström, Y. & Engeström, R. (1986). Developmental work research: The approach and an application in cleaning work. Nordisk Pedagogik, 6(1), 2–15.
Engeström, Y., Engeström, R. & Kärkkäinen, M. (1995). Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: Learning and problem solving in complex work activities. Learning and Instruction, 5, 319–336.
Engeström, Y., Engeström, R. & Kerosuo, H. (2003). The discursive construction of collaborative care. Applied Linguistics, 24, 286–315.
Engeström, Y., Engeström, R. & Suntio, A. (2002a). Can a school community learn to master its own future? An activity-theoretical study of expansive learning among middle school teachers. In Wells, G. & Claxton, G. (Eds.) Learning for life in the 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education. London: Blackwell (pp. 211–224).
Engeström, Y., Engeström, R. & Suntio, A. (2002b). From paralyzing myths to expansive action: Building computer-supported knowledge work into the curriculum from below. In Stahl, G. (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum (pp. 318–324).
Engeström, Y., Engeström, R. & Vähäaho, T. (1999). When the center does not hold: The importance of knotworking. In Chaiklin, S., Hedegaard, M. & Jensen, U. J. (Eds.), Activity theory and social practice. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press (pp. 345–374).
Engeström, Y. & Escalante, V. (1996). Mundane tool or object of affection? The rise and fall of the Postal Buddy. In Nardi, B. A. (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge: The MIT Press (pp. 325–374).
Engeström, Y., Kaatrakoski, H., Kaiponen, P., Lahikainen, J., Myllys, H., Rantavuori, J. & Sinikara, K. (2012). Knotworking in academic libraries: Two case studies from the University of Helsinki. Liber Quarterly, 21(3/4), 387–405.
Engeström, Y., Kajamaa, A., Kerosuo, H. & Laurila, P. (2010). Process enhancement versus community building: Transcending the dichotomy through expansive learning. In Yamazumi, K. (Ed.), Activity theory and fostering learning: Developmental interventions in education and work. Osaka: Center for Human Activity Theory, Kansai University (pp. 1–28).
Engeström, Y. & Kerosuo, H. (2007). From workplace learning to inter-organizational learning and back: The contribution of activity theory. Journal of Workplace Learning, 19, 336–342.
Engeström, Y., Kerosuo, H. & Kajamaa, A. (2007). Beyond discontinuity: Expansive organizational learning remembered. Management Learning, 38(3), 319–336.
Engeström, Y., Lompscher, J. & Rückriem, G. (Eds.) (2005). Putting activity theory to work: Contributions from developmental work research. Berlin: Lehmanns Media.
Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R. & Punamäki, R-L. (Eds.) (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y., Nummijoki, J. & Sannino, A. (2012). Embodied germ cell at work: Building an expansive concept of physical mobility in home care. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(3), 287–309.
Engeström, Y., Pasanen, A., Toiviainen, H. & Haavisto, V. (2005). Expansive learning as collaborative concept formation at work. In Yamazumi, K., Engeström, Y. & Daniels, H. (Eds.), New learning challenges: Going beyond the industrial age system of school and work. Osaka: Kansai University Press (pp. 47–78).
Engeström, Y., Puonti, A. & Seppänen, L. (2003). Spatial and temporal expansion of the object as a challenge for reorganizing work. In Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S. & Yanow, D. (Eds.), Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach. Armonk: Sharpe (pp. 151–186).
Engeström, Y., Rantavuori, J. & Kerosuo, H. (2013). Expansive learning in a library: Actions, cycles and deviations from instructional intentions. Vocations and Learning. 6(1), 81–106.
Engeström, Y. & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1–24.
Engeström, Y. & Sannino, A. (2011). Discursive manifestations of contradictions in organizational change efforts: A methodological framework. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(3), 368–387.
Engeström, Y. & Sannino, A. (2012). Whatever happened to process theories of learning? Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1, 45–56.
Engeström, Y., Sannino, A. & Virkkunen, J. (2014). On the methodological demands of formative interventions. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 21(2), 118–128.
Engeström, Y., Virkkunen, J., Helle, M., Pihlaja, J. & Poikela, R. (1996). The Change Laboratory as a tool for transforming work. Lifelong Learning in Europe, 1(2), 10–17.
Eskola, A. (1999). Laws, logics, and human activity. In Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R. & Punamäki, R-L. (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Falmagne, R. J. (1995). The abstract and the concrete. In Martin, L. M. W., Nelson, K. & Tobach, E. (Eds.), Sociocultural psychology: Theory and practice of doing and knowing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feenberg, A. (1999). Questioning technology. New York: Routledge.
Felstead, A., Fuller, A., Unwin, L., Ashton, D., Butler, P. & Lee, T. (2005). Surveying the scene: Learning metaphors, survey design and the workplace context. Journal of Education and Work, 18(4), 359–383.
Fenwick, T. J. (2004). Learning in portfolio work: Anchored innovation and mobile identity. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(2), 229–245.
Fenwick, T. J. (2006a). Organisational learning in the “knots”: Discursive capacities emerging in a school-university collaboration. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(2), 138–153.
Fenwick, T. J. (2006b). Toward enriched conceptions of work learning: Participation, expansion, and translation among individuals with/in activity. Human Resource Development Review, 5(3), 285–302.
FitzSimons, G. E. (2003). Using Engeström’s expansive learning framework to analyse a case study in adult mathematics education. Literacy & Numeracy Studies, 12(2), 47–63.
Fleck, J. (1994). Learning by trying: The implementation of configurational technology. Research Policy, 23, 637–652.
Foot, K. (2001). Cultural-historical activity theory as practice theory: Illuminating the development of a conflict-monitoring network. Communication Theory, 11(1), 56–83.
Galer, G. S. & van der Heijden, K. (2001). Scenarios and their contribution to organizational learning: From practice to theory. In Dierkes, M., Antal, A. B., Child, J. & Nonaka, I. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press (pp. 849–864).
Gal’perin, P. Y. (1957). An experimental study in the formation of mental actions. In Simon, B. (Ed.), Psychology in the Soviet Union. Stanford: Stanford University Press (pp. 213–232).
Gal’perin, P. Y. (1967). On the notion of internalization. Soviet Psychology, 5(3), 28–33.
Gal’perin, P. Y. (1969). Stages in the development of mental acts. In Cole, M. & Maltzman, I. (Eds.), A handbook of contemporary Soviet psychology. New York: Basic Books (pp. 249–273).
Garud, R. & Karnoe, P. (Eds.) (2001). Path dependence and creation. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gersick, C. J. G. (1991). Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Review, 16, 10–36.
Gould, S. J. (1987). Time’s arrow, time’s cycle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Gourlay, S. (2006). Conceptualizing knowledge creation: A critique of Nonaka’s theory. Journal of Management Studies, 43(7), 1415–1436.
Gozdz, K. (Ed.) (1995). Community building: Renewing spirit and learning in business. San Francisco: Sterling & Stone.
Greeno, J. G. & Engeström, Y. (2014). Learning in activity. In Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Greenstein, D. (2010). Strategies for sustaining the university library. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 10 (2), 121–125.
Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J. & Martens, R. L. (2005). The surplus value of an authentic learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 509–521.
Gutiérrez, K. D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164.
Gutiérrez, K., Baguedano-López, P. & Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6(4), 286–303.
Gutiérrez, K. & Larson, J. (2007). Discussing expanded spaces for learning. Language Arts, 85(1), 69–77.
Gutierrez, K. D., Rymes, B. & Larson, J. (1995). Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom - Brown, James versus Brown v. Board of Education. Harvard Educational Review, 65, 445–471.
Gutiérrez, K. & Vossoughi, S. (2010). Lifting off the ground to return anew: Mediated praxis, transformative learning, and social design experiments. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 100–117.
Haavisto, V. (2002). Court work in transition: An activity-theoretical study of changing work practices in a Finnish district court. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Education.
Haenen, J. (2001). Outlining the teaching-learning process: Piotr Gal’perin’s contribution. Learning and Istruction, 11, 157–170.
Haigh, J. (2007). Expansive learning in the university setting: The case for simulated clinical experience. Nurse Education in Practice, 7, 95–102.
Hall, R. & Greeno, J. G. (2008). Conceptual learning. In Good, T. (Ed.), 21st Century Education: A Reference Handbook. London: Sage (pp. 212–221).
Hammer, M. (1990), Reengineering work: Don’t automate, obliterate! Harvard Business Review, 68(4), 104–112.
Hammer, M. & Champy, J. (1993), Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
Harders, M., Malangoni, M., Weight, S. & Sidhu, T. (2006). Improving operating room efficiency through process redesign. Surgery, 140(4), 509–516.
Harré, R. (1984). Personal being: A theory of individual psychology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Harrington, B., McLoughlin, K. & Riddel, D. (1997). Business process re-engineering in the public sector: A case study of the contributions agency. New Technology, Work and Employment, 13(1), 43–50.
Hasu, M. (2000). Blind men and the elephant: Implementation of a new artifact as an expansive possibility. Outlines, 2, 5–41.
Hasu, M. & Engeström, Y. (2000). Measurement in action: An activity-theoretical perspective on producer-user interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53, 61–89.
Herrington, J. & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 48(3), 23–48.
Heylighen, F. (2007). Why is open access development so successful? Stigmergic organization and the economics of information. In Lutterbeck, B., Baerwolff, M. & Gehring, R. A. (Eds.), Open Source Jahrbuch 2007. Berlin: Lehmanns Media.
Hill, R., Capper, P., Wilson, K., Whatman, R. & Wong, K. (2007). Workplace learning in the New Zealand apple industry network: A new co-design method for government “practice making”. Journal of Workplace Learning, 19(6), 359–376.
von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
von Hippel, E. & Tyre, M. J. (1995). How learning by doing is done: Problem identification in novel process equipment. Research Policy, 24, 1–12.
Hobsbawm, E. J. (1964). The tramping artisan. In Hobsbawm, E. (Ed.), Labouring men: Studies in the history of labour. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson (pp. 5–22).
Hodkinson, P., Biesta, G. & James, D. (2007). Understanding learning culturally: Overcoming the dualism between social and individual views of learning. Vocations and Learning, 1(1), 27–47.
Holstein, J. A. & Gubrium, J. F. (1998). Active interviewing. In Silverman, D. (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice. London: Sage Publications (pp. 113–129).
Holzkamp, K. (1993). Lernen: Subjektwissenschaftliche Grundlegung [Learning: A subject-scientific foundation]. Frankfurt am Main: Campus (in German).
Hubbard, L., Mehan, H. & Stein, M. K. (2006). Reform as learning: School reform, organizational culture, and community politics in San Diego. New York: Routledge.
Hutchins, E. (2005). Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1555–1577.
Hyrkkänen, U. (2007). Käsityksistä ajatuksen poluille: Ammatikorkeakoulun tutkimus- ja kehitystoiminnan konseptin kehittäminen [From conceptions to cognitive trails: Developing the concept of research and development activity for the university of applied sciences]. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Education (in Finnish).
Hyysalo, S. (2004). Uses of innovation: Wristcare in the practices of engineers and elderly. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Education.
Il’enkov, E. V. (1977). Dialectical logic: Essays in its history and theory. Moscow: Progress.
Il’enkov, E. V. (1982). The dialectics of the abstract and the concrete in Marx’s Capital. Moscow: Progress.
Ingold, T. (2007). Lines: A brief history. London: Routledge.
Järvelä, S. & Volet, S. (2004). Motivation in real-life, dynamic, and interactive learning environments: Stretching constructs and methodologies. European Psychologist, 9, 193–197.
Jonassen, D. H. & Land, S. M. (2000). Theoretical foundations of learning environments. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kafai, Y. & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2009). Notes from the new editors-in-chief. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 4–6.
Kanigel, R. (1997). The one best way: Frederick Winslow Taylor and the enigma of efficiency. New York: Viking.
Kärkkäinen, M. (1999). Teams as breakers of traditional work practices: A longitudinal study of planning and implementing curriculum units in elementary school teacher teams. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Education.
Karvonen, S., Rämö, J., Leijala, M. & Holmström, J. (2004). Productivity improvement in heart surgery: A case study on care process development. Production Planning and Control, 15(3), 238–246.
Kazlauskas, A. & Crawford, K. (2007). Learning what is not yet there: Knowledge mobilization in a communal activity. In Verenikina, I., Kell, P. & Vogl, G. (Eds.), Learning and socio-cultural theory: Exploring modern Vygotskian perspectives. Workshop proceedings. Wollongong: University of Wollongong. ISBN 978-1-74128-138-5. E-version: http://ro.uow.edu.au/llrg Keller, C. (2005). Virtual learning environments: Three implementation perspectives. Learning, Media & Technology, 30, 299–311.
Keller, C. M. & Keller, J. D. (1996). Cognition and tool use: The blacksmith at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kelly, A. E. (2004). Design research in education: Yes, but is it methodological? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 115–128.
Kelly, A. E., Lesh, R. A. & Baek, J. Y. (Eds.) (2008). Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching. New York: Routledge.
Kerosuo, H. (2001). “Boundary encounters” as a place for learning and development at work. Outlines - Critical Social Studies, 3(1), 53–65.
Kerosuo, H. (2006). Boundaries in action: An activity-theoretical study of development, learning and change in health care for patients with multiple and chronic illnesses. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Education.
Kerosuo, H. & Engeström, Y. (2003). Boundary crossing and learning in creation of new work practice. Journal of Workplace Learning, 15, 345–351.
Kerosuo, H. Kajamaa, A. & Engeström, Y. (2005). Building bridges between the past, present and future: Narrative and emotional remembering of organizational change efforts. In Gherardi, S. & Nicolini, D. (Eds.), The passion for learning and knowing. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Organizational Learning and Knowledge. Trento: University of Trento.
Kindred, J. B. (1999). “8/18/97 Bite Me”: Resistance in learning and work. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6, 196–221.
Kirshner, P. A. (2005). Learning in innovative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 547–554.
Kivi, A. (1929). Seven brothers. New York: Coward–McCann.
Klein, N. (2007). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. London: Allen Lane.
Knights, D. & Willmott, H. (Eds.) (2000). The reengineering revolution: Critical studies of corporate change. London: Sage.
Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (1997). Sociality with objects: Social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory, Culture & Society, 14(4), 1–30.
Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (2005). From pipes to scopes: The flow architecture of financial markets. In Barry, A. (Ed.), The technological economy. London: Routledge.
de Kock, A., Sleegers, P. & Voeten, M. J. M. (2004). New learning and the classification of learning environments in secondary education. Review of Educational Research, 74, 141–170.
Kolb, A. Y. & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 192–212.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Kolb, D. A., Rubin, I. & McIntyre, J. (1971). Organizational psychology: An experiential approach. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Kolodner, J. L. (1991). The Journal of the Learning Sciences: Effecting changes in education. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 1–6.
Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Entering our tenth year: We’ve come a long way, and thank you to all. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(1), 1–4.
Kolodner, J. L. (2009). Note from the outgoing editor-in-chief. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 1–3.
Konkola, R., Tuomi-Gröhn, T., Lambert, P. & Ludvigsen, S. (2007). Promoting learning and transfer between school and workplace. Journal of Education and Work, 20(3), 211–228.
Kosík, K. (1976). Dialectics of the concrete: A study on problems of man and world. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Kruger, A. C. & Tomasello, M. (1998). Cultural learning and learning culture. In Olson, D. R. & Torrance, N. (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development. Malden: Blackwell (pp. 369–387).
Lambert, P. (1999). Rajaviiva katoaa: Innovatiivista oppimista ammatillisen opettajankoulutuksen, oppilaitosten ja työelämän organisaatioiden yhteistyönä [Boundaries fade away: Innovative learning through collaboration between vocational teacher education, training institutes, and work organizations]. Helsinki: Helsingin ammattikorkeakoulu (in Finnish).
Langemeyer, I. (2006). Contradictions in expansive learning: Towards a critical analysis of self-dependent forms of learning in relation to contemporary socio-technological change. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 7(1), Article 12 (www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/). Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Law, J. & Lynch, M. (1988). Lists, field guides, and the descriptive organization of seeing: Birdwatching as an exemplary observational activity. Human Studies, 11(2/3), 271–304.
Lee, G. K. & Cole, R. E. (2003). From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: The case of the Linux kernel development. Organization Science, 14(6), 633-649.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1932). The development of voluntary attention in the child. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 40, 52–81.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress.
Leppilahti, J. & Malmqvist, S. (2006), Tekonivelpotilaan hoitoprosessin kehittämisanalyysi. Unpublished final report of the process study on knee and hip surgery at Oulu University Hospital, August 31, 2006 (in Finnish).
Levinthal, D. A. & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95–112.
Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1(1), 5–41.
Lillrank, P. & Parvinen, P. (2004). Omistaja, prosessi, potilas [Owner, process, patient]. Suomen Lääkärilehti, 59(10), 1052–1055 (in Finnish).
Loch, C. H. & Huberman, B. A. (1999). A punctuated-equilibrium model of technology diffusion. Management Science, 45, 160–177.
Lompscher, J. (2004). Lernkultur und Kompetenzentwicklung aus kulturhistoricher Sicht: Lernen Erwachsener im Arbeitsprozess [Learning culture and competence development in a cultural-historical perspective: Adult learning in the process of work]. Berlin: Lehmanns Media (in German).
Long, N. (2001). Development sociology: Actor perspectives. London: Routledge.
Maccoby, M. (2006). Health care organizations as collaborative learning communities. In Heckscher, C. & Adler, P. S. (Eds.), The firm as a collaborative community: Reconstructing trust in the knowledge economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Macpherson, I., Robertson, S. & Walford, G. (2014). Education, privatisation and social justice: Case studies from Africa, South Asia and South East Asia. Oxford: Symposium Books.
Majchrzak, A., Jarvenpaa, S. L. & Hollingshead, A. B. (2007). Coordinating expertise among emergent groups responding to disasters. Organization Science, 18(1), 147–161.
Makino, Y. (2007). The third generation of e-learning: Expansive learning mediated by a weblog. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 3 (1), 16–31.
Mäkitalo, J. (2005). Work-related well-being in the transformation of nursing home work. Oulu: Oulu University Press.
Malloch, M., Cairns, L., Evans, K. & O’Connor, B. N. (Eds.) (2011). The SAGE handbook of workplace learning. Los Angeles: Sage.
Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography, Annual Review of Ethnography 24, 95–117.
Martin, D. (2008). A new paradigm to inform inter-professional learning for integrating speech and language provision into secondary schools: A socio-cultural activity theory approach. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 24(2), 173–192.
Martin, T. S., McCrone, S. M., Bower, M. L. & Dindyal, J. (2005). The interplay of teacher and student actions in the teaching and learning of geometric proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, 95–124.
Marton, F. (2006). Sameness and difference in transfer. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 499–535.
Marton, F. & Trigwell, K. (2000). Variatio est mater studiorum. Higher Education Research & Development, 19(3), 381–395.
Maxwell, J. A. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33, 3–11.
McNeil, L. M. (1999). Contradictions of control: School structure and school knowledge. New York: Routledge.
McNulty, T. & Ferlie, E. (2004). Process transformations: Limitations to radical organizational change within public service organizations. Organization Studies, 28(8), 1389–1412.
McVee, M. B., Dunsmore, K. & Gavelek, J. R. (2005). Schema theory revisited. Review of Educational Research, 75(4), 531–566.
Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes: Collective action in the information age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mercer, N. & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. London: Routledge.
Meyers, E. M. (2007). From activity to learning: Using cultural historical activity theory to model school library programmes and practices. Information Research, 12(3), 5.
Middleton, D. & Edwards, D. (1990). Conversational remembering: A social psychological approach. In Middleton, D. & Edwards, D. (Eds.), Collective remembering. London: Sage Publication.
Middleton, J., Gorard, S., Taylor, C. & Bannan-Ritland, B. (2008). The “compleat” design experiment: From soup to nuts. In Kelly, A. E., Lesh, R. A. & Baek, J. Y. (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching. New York: Routledge.
Midgley, G. (2000). Systemic intervention: Philosophy, methodology, and practice. New York: Kluwer.
Miettinen, R. (2000). The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey’s theory of reflective thought and action. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 19(1), 54–72.
Mishler, E. (1986). Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects: Philosophy and ecology after the end of the world. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Mukute, M. (2010). Exploring and expanding learning processes in sustainable agriculture workplace contexts. PhD thesis. Grahamstown, South Africa: Rhodes University.
Nadler, D. A., Shaw, R. B. & Walton, A. E. (1995). Discontinuous change: Leading organizational transformation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Needham, G. & Ally, M. (Eds.) (2008). Mlibraries: Libraries on the move to provide virtual access. London: Facet Publishing.
Nilsson, M. (2003). Transformation through integration: An activity theoretical analysis of school development as integration of child care institutions and elementary school. Karlskrona: Blekinge Institute of Technology.
Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nonaka, I., Toyama, R. & Byosiére, P. (2001). A theory of organizational knowledge creation: Understanding the dynamic process of creating knowledge. In Dierkes, M., Antal, A. B., Child, J. & Nonaka, I. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press (pp. 491–517).
Norman, D. A. (1978). Notes toward a theory of complex learning. In Lesgold, A., Pellegrino, J. W., Fokkema, S. D. & Glaser, R. (Eds.), Cognitive psychology and instruction. New York: Plenum (pp. 39–48).
Norman, D. A. (1982). Learning and memory. New York: W. H. Freeman.
Nummijoki, J. & Engeström, Y. (2009). Towards co-configuration in home care of the elderly: Cultivating agency by designing and implementing the mobility agreement. In Daniels, H., Edwards, A., Engeström, Y., Gallagher, T. & Ludvigsen, S. (Eds.), Activity theory in practice: Promoting learning across boundaries and agencies. London: Routledge.
O’Donnell, C. L. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K–12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78, 33–84.
O’Dowd, T. C. (1988). Five years of heartsink patients in general practice. British Medical Journal, 97, 528–530.
Ohlsson, S. (2011). Deep learning: How the mind overrides experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Olson, D. R. (2004). The triumph of hope over experience in the search for “what works”: A response to Slavin. Educational Researcher, 33, 24–26.
Olson, D. R. & Torrance, N. (Eds.) (1998). The handbook of education and human development. Oxford: Blackwell.
O’Neill, P. & Sohal, A. S. (1999). Business process reengineering: A review of recent literature. Technovation, 19(9), 571–581.
Orlikowski, W. (1996). Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Information Systems Research, 7, 63–92.
Oser, F. K. & Baeriswyl, F. J. (2001). Choreagraphies of teaching: Bridging instruction to learning. In Richardson, V. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. Fourth edition. Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association (pp. 1031–1065).
Paavola, S., Lipponen, L. & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74, 557–576.
Palen, L., Hiltz, S. R. & Liu, S. B. (2007). Online forums supporting grassroots participation in emergency preparedness and response. Communications of the ACM, 50(3), 54–58.
Peck, C. A., Gallucci, C., Sloan, T. & Lippincott, A. (2009). Organizational learning and program renewal in teacher education: A sociocultural theory of learning, innovation and change. Educational Research Review, 4, 16–25.
Peltokorpi, A. & Kujala, J. (2006). Time-based analysis of total cost of patient episodes: A case study of hip replacement. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 19(2), 136–145.
Pereira-Querol, M. & Seppänen, L. (2009). Learning as changes in activity systems: The emergence of on-farm biogas production for carbon credits. Outlook on Agriculture, 38(2), 147–155.
Perez, C. (2002). Technological revolutions and financial capital: The dynamics of bubbles and golden ages. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Pettigrew, A. (1995). Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. In Huber, G. & Van de Ven, A. (Eds.), Longitudinal field research methods: Studying processes of organizational change. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Petryna, A., Lakoff, A. & Kleinman, A. (Eds.) (2006). Global pharmaceuticals: Ethics, markets, practices. Durham: Duke University Press.
Pihlaja, J. (2005). Learning in and for production: An activity-theoretical study of the historical development of distributed systems of generalizing. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Education.
Pine, B. J. II (1993). Mass customization: The new frontier in business competition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Pippin, R. B. (1995). On the notion of technology as ideology. In Feenberg, A. & Hannay, A. (Eds.), Technology and the politics of knowledge. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Polanyi, M., (1966). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Poole, M. S., Van de Ven, A. H., Dooley, K. & Holmes, M. E. (2000). Organizational change and innovation processes: Theory and methods for research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prensky, M. (2008). Students as designers and creators of educational computer games: Who else? British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 1004–1019.
Pressman, J. L. & Wildavsky, A. (1984). Implementation. Third edition. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Prusak, L. (1997). Knowledge in organizations. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Puonti, A. (2004). Learning to work together: Collaboration between authorities in economic-crime investigation. Vantaa: National Bureau of Investigation.
Quinn, R. E. & Cameron, K. S. (Eds.) (1988). Paradox and transformation: Towards a theory of change in organization and management. Cambridge: Ballinger.
Radley, A. & Taylor, D. (2003). Remembering one’s stay in hospital: A study in photography, recovery and forgetting. Health, 7(2), 129–159.
Rao, H., Morrill, C. & Zald, M. N. (2000). Power plays: How social movements and collective action create new organizational forms. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 239–282.
Rasmussen, I. & Ludvigsen, S. (2009). The hedgehog and the fox: A discussion of the approaches to the analysis of ICT reforms in teacher education of Larry Cuban and Yrjö Engeström. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 16(1), 83–104.
Ravitch, D. (2014). Reign of error: The hoax of the privatization movement and the danger to America’s public schools. New York: Knopf.
Rheingold, H. (2002). Smart mobs: The next social revolution. Cambridge: Perseus.
Romanelli, E. & Tushman, M. (1994). Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium: An empirical test. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1141–1166.
Rorabaugh, W. J. (1986). The craft apprectice: From Franklin to the machine age in America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rose, N. (2007). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Roth, W-M. & Lee, Y-J. (2007). Vygotsky’s neglected legacy: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77(2), 186–232.
Rubtsov, V. V. (1991). Learning in children: Organization and development of cooperative actions. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Rückriem, G. (2009). Digital technology and mediation: A challenge to activity theory. In Sannino, A., Daniels, H. & Gutiérrez, K. (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rumelhart, D. E. & Norman, D. A. (1978). Accretion, tuning and restructuring: Three modes of learning. In Cotton, J. W. & Klatzky, R. (Eds.), Semantic factors in cognition. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Saaren-Seppälä, T. (2004). Yhteisen potilaan hoito: Tutkimus organisaatiorajat ylittävästä yhteistoiminnasta sairaalan, terveyskeskuksen ja lapsipotilaiden vanhempien suhteissa [The care of a shared patient: A study of collaboration across organizational boundaries between hospital, health center and parents of child patients]. Tampere: University of Tampere.
Sackett, D.L. & Rosenberg, M.C. (1995). On the need for evidence-based medicine. Journal of Public Health Medicine, 17(3), 330–334.
Salovaara, H. & Järvelä, S. (2003). Students’ strategic actions in computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning Environments Research, 6, 267–285.
Sannino, A. (2005). Cultural-historical and discursive tools for analyzing critical conflicts in students’ development. In Yamazumi, K., Engeström, Y. & Daniels, H. (Eds.), New learning challenges: Going beyond the industrial age system of school and work. Osaka: Kansai University Press.
Sannino, A. (2008a). Experiencing conversations: Bridging the gap between discourse and activity. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38(3), 267–291.
Sannino, A. (2008b). From talk to action: Experiencing interlocution in developmental interventions. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 15, 234–257.
Sannino, A. (2010a). Breaking out of a professional abstraction: The pupil as materialized object for teacher trainees. In Ellis, V., Edwards, A. & Smagorinsky, P. (Eds.), Cultural-historical perspectives on teacher education and development: Learning teaching. London: Routlege.
Sannino, A. (2010b). Teachers’ talk of experiencing: Conflict, resistance and agency. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 838–844.
Sannino, A., Daniels, H. & Gutiérrez, K. D. (2009a). Activity theory between historical engagement and future-making practice. In Sannino, A., Daniels, H. & Gutiérrez, K. D. (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sannino, A., Daniels, H. & Gutiérrez, K. D. (Eds.) (2009b) Learning and expanding with activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sannino, A. & Nocon, H. (2008). Introduction: Activity theory and school innovation. Journal of Educational Change, 9(4), 325–328.
Sawchuck, P. H. (2011). Researching workplace learning: An overview and critique. In Malloch, M., Cairns, L., Evans, K. & O’Connor, B. N. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of workplace learning. Los Angeles: Sage (pp. 165–180).
Sawyer, R. K. (2006a). Introduction: The new science of learning. In Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (pp. 1–16).
Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.) (2006b). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.) (2014). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scarbrough, H., Bresnen, M., Edelman, L. F., Laurent, S., Newell, S. & Swan, J. (2004). The processes of project-based learning. Management Learning, 35(4), 491–506.
Schaupp, M. (2011). From function-based development practices to collaborative capability building: An intervention to extend practitioners’ ideas. In Poell, R. F. & van Woerkom, M. (Eds.), Supporting workplace learning: Towards evidence-based practice. New York: Springer (pp. 205–224).
Schwartz, D. L., Chang, J. & Martin, L. (2008). Instrumentation and innovation in design experiments: Taking the turn towards efficiency. In Kelly, A. E., Lesh, R. A. & Baek, J. Y. (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching. New York: Routledge.
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
Seppänen, L. (2004). Learning challenges in organic vegetable farming: An activity-theoretical study of on-farm practices. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Institute for Rural Research and Training.
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors of learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.
Shuell, T. J. (1990). Phases of meaningful learning. Review of Educational Research, 60(4), 531–547.
Shumar, W. (2013). College for sale: A critique of the commodification of higher education. New York: Routledge.
Siltala, J., Freeman, S. & Miettinen, R. (2007). Exploring the tensions between volunteers and firms in hybrid projects. Helsinki: Center for Activity Theory and Developmental Work Research (Working Paper 36).
Silva, M. J. (2007). Children as creators of multisensory geographic information. Volunteered Geographic Information Workshop: Supplementary Papers, University of California, Santa Barbara, National Center for Geographic Information & Analysis. Available at www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/projects/vgi/supp.html. Soule, S. A. (2012). Social movements and markets, industries and firms. Organization Studies, 33(12), 1715–1733.
Spasser, M. (2002). Realist activity theory for digital library evaluation: Conceptual framework and case study. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 81–110.
Star, S. L. & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 9, 387–420.
Streeck, W. & Thelen, K. (Eds.) (2005). Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sutter, B. (2001). Instruction at heart: Activity-theoretical studies of learning and development in coronary clinical work. Karlskrona: Blekinge Institute of Technology.
Tabak, I. & Radinsky, J. (2013). Note from the incoming editors. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(1), 4–6.
Talyzina, N. F. (1981). The pscyhology of learning: Theories of learning and programmed instruction. Moscow: Progress.
Tapscott, D. & Williams, A. (2007). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. London: Atlantic Books.
Teräs, M. (2007). Intercultural learning and hybridity in the Culture Laboratory. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Education.
Tilak, J. B. G. (2008). Higher education: A public good or a commodity for trade? Prospects, 38, 449–466.
Toikka, K., Hyötyläinen, R. & Norros, L. (1986). Development of work in flexible manufacturing. Nordisk Pedagogik, 6(1), 16–24.
Toiviainen, H. (2003). Learning across levels: Challenges of collaboration in a small-firm network. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Education.
Toiviainen, H. (2007). Inter-organizational learning across levels: An object-oriented approach. Journal of Workplace Learning, 19(6), 343–358.
Toiviainen, H. & Engeström, Y. (2009) Expansive learning in and for work. In Daniels, H., Lauder, H. & Porter, J. (Eds.), Knowledge, values and educational policy. London: Routledge (pp. 95–109).
Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Tsoukas, H. (2005). Complex knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tsui, A. B. M. & Law, D. Y. K. (2007). Learning as boundary-crossing in school–university partnership. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 1289–1301.
Tuomi-Gröhn, T. & Engeström, Y. (Eds.) (2003). Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Tyre, M. J. & von Hippel, E. (1997). The situated nature of adaptive learning in organizations. Organization Science, 8(1), 71–83.
Vakola, M. & Rezgui, Y. (2000). Critique of existing business process re-engineering methodologies: The development and implementation of a new methodology. Business Process Management Journal, 6(3), 238–250.
Van de Ven, A. H. & Poole, M. S. (1988). Paradoxical requirements for a theory of organizational change. In Quinn, R. E. & Cameron, K. S. (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Towards a theory of change in organization and management. Cambridge: Ballinger.
Van der Veer, R. & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Oxford: Blackwell.
Vasilyuk, F. (1988). The psychology of experiencing. Moscow: Progress.
Vayda, A. P., McCay, B. J. & Eghenter, C. (1991). Concepts of process in social science explanations. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 21(3), 318–331.
Victor, B. & Boynton, A. C. (1998). Invented here: Maximizing your organization’s internal growth and profitability. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Vince, R. (1998). Behind and beyond Kolb’s learning cycle. Journal of Management Education, 22(3), 304–319.
Virkkunen, J. (2004). Developmental interventions in work activities: An activity theoretical interpretation. In Kontinen, T. (Ed.), Development intervention: Actor and activity perspectives. Helsinki: Center for Activity Theory and Developmental Work Research and Institute for Development Studies, University of Helsinki.
Virkkunen, J. (2006a). Dilemmas in building shared transformative agency. @ctivités revue électronique, 3 (1), 43–66.
Virkkunen, J. (2006b). Hybrid agency in co-configuration work. Outlines, 8(1), 61–75.
Virkkunen, J. (2009). Two theories of organizational knowledge creation. In Sannino, A., Daniels, H. & Gutiérrez, K. D. (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (pp. 144–159).
Virkkunen, J., & Ahonen, H. (2004). Transforming learning and knowledge creation on the shop floor. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 4(1), 57–72.
Virkkunen, J. & Ahonen, H. (2011). Supporting expansive learning through theoretical-genetic reflection in the Change Laboratory. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(2), 229–243.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987a). Lectures on psychology. In The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 1. Problems of general psychology. New York: Plenum.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987b). Thinking and speech. In The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 1: Problems of general psychology. New York: Plenum.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997a). The historical meaning of the crisis in psychology: A methodological investigation. In The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 3. Problems of the theory and history of psychology. New York: Plenum.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997b). The history of the development of higher mental functions. In The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 4. The history of the development of higher mental functions. New York: Plenum.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997c). The instrumental method in psychology. In The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 3. Problems of the theory and history of psychology. New York: Plenum.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). The problem of age. In The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Vol. 5. Child psychology. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1999). Tool and sign in the development of the child. In The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 6. Scientific legacy. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
Walker, C. R. & Guest, R. H. (1952). The man on the assembly line. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Warmington, P. (2008). From “activity” to “labour”: Commodification, labour-power and contradiction in Engeström’s activity theory. Outlines, 10(2), 4–19.
Wasson, B., Ludvigsen, S. & Hoppe, U. (Eds.) (2003). Designing for change in networked learning environments. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Williams, R., Stewart, J. & Slack, R. (2005). Social learning in technological innovation: Experimenting with information and communication technologies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T. & Roos, D. (1990). The machine that changed the world. New York: HarperCollins.
Wright, W. & Middendorf, G. (Eds.) (2008). The fight over food: Producers, consumers, and activists challenge the global food system. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Yamazumi, K. (2008). A hybrid activity system as educational innovation. Journal of Educational Change, 9(4), 365–373.
Yamazumi, K. (2009). Expansive agency in multi-activity collaboration. In Sannino, A., Daniels, H. & Gutiérrez, K. (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Young, M. (2001). Contextualising a new approach to learning: Some comments on Yrjö Engeström’s theory of expansive learning. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 157–161.
Zinchenko, V. P. (1985). Vygotsky’s ideas about units for the analysis of mind. In Wertsch, J. V. (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
