Abrams, P. 1972. The sense of the past and the origins of sociology. Past & Present, 55, 18–32.Google Scholar

African Development Bank. 2011. Cape Verde – A Success Story. Tunis: Regional–West 2 Department (ORWB). www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Project-and-Operations/Cape%20Verde%20-%20A%20Success%20Story.pdf (accessed 9 November 2017).Google Scholar

African Development Bank. 2012. Cape Verde – The Road Ahead. Tunis: Regional–West 2 Department (ORWB). www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Project-and-Operations/Cape%20Verde%20-%20The%20Road%20Ahead.pdf (accessed 9 November 2011).Google Scholar

Alcorn, G. 2016. Australians are being told that gender inequality is the root cause of domestic violence. But is it? The Guardian, 19 February 2016. www.theguardian.com/society/2016/feb/19/australians-are-being-told-that-gender-inequality-is-the-root-cause-of-domestic-violence-but-is-it (accessed 8 November 2017).Google Scholar

Allen, R. C. 2009. The British Industrial Revolution in Global Perspective. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, M. 2016. For Earth Day, here’s how Americans view environmental issues. Pew Research Center. www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/04/20/for-earth-day-heres-how-americans-view-environmental-issues (accessed 29 October 2017).Google Scholar

André, K., Simonsson, L., Swartling, Å. G. & Linnér, B.-O. 2012. Method development for identifying and analysing stakeholders in climate change adaptation processes. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 14, 243–261.Google Scholar

Anshelm, J. & Hultman, M. 2015. Discourses of Global Climate Change: Apocalyptic Framing and Political Antagonisms. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Arab News. 2016. Kingdom renews commitment to green cause. Arab News, 16 November 2016. www.arabnews.com/node/1011391/saudi-arabia (accessed 16 November 2017).Google Scholar

Arcadis. 2015. Global City Focus: Pearl River Delta. Amsterdam: Arcadis. www.arcadis.com/media/C/6/4/%7BC6493906-5C11-4C0F-8082-5DF61D0B0051%7DPearl%20River%20Delta%20City%20Focus.pdf (accessed 13 January 2017).Google Scholar

Arthur, W. B. 2010. The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Ashara Al Awsat. 2016. Saudi Arabia stresses commitment to address climate change challenges. Ashara Al Awsat, 16 November 2016. https://eng-archive.aawsat.com/theaawsat/news-middle-east/saudi-arabia/saudi-arabia-stresses-commitment-address-climate-change-challenges (accessed 16 November 2017).Google Scholar

Asia Business Council. 2011. Economic Transformation of the Greater Pearl River Delta: Moving Up the Value Chain. Hong Kong: Asia Business Council. www.asiabusinesscouncil.org/docs/PRDBriefing.pdf (accessed 29 October 2017).Google Scholar

Asplund, T. 2011. Metaphors in climate discourse: an analysis of Swedish farm magazines. Journal of Science Communication, 10, A01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asplund, T. 2014. Climate Change Frames and Frame Formation: An Analysis of Climate Change Communication in the Swedish Agricultural Sector. Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press.Google Scholar

Bäckstrand, K., Kuyper, J. W., Linnér, B.-O. & Lövbrand, E. 2017. Non-state actors in global climate governance: from Copenhagen to Paris and beyond. Environmental Politics, 26, 561–579.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Ballantyne, A. G. 2016. Climate change communication: what can we learn from communication theory? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7, 329–344.Google Scholar

Baptista, L. C. 2003. Framing and cognition. In: Treviño, J. A. (ed.) Goffman’s Legacy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar

Barbour, R. 2007. Doing Focus Groups. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barkemeyer, R., Figge, F. & Holt, D. 2013. Sustainability-related media coverage and socioeconomic development: a regional and North–South perspective. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31, 716–740.Google Scholar

Barnes, M. D., Hanson, C. L., Novilla, L. M., et al. 2008. Analysis of media agenda setting during and after hurricane Katrina: implications for emergency preparedness, disaster response, and disaster policy. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 604–610.Google Scholar

Barrett, B. 1999. Environmentalism in periods of rapid societal transformation: the legacy of the Industrial Revolution in the United Kingdom and the Meiji Restoration in Japan. Sustainable Development, 7, 178–190.Google Scholar

Barros, V. R., Field, C. B., Dokke, D. J., et al. (eds.). 2014. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: IPCC.Google Scholar

Barrow, S. 2013. Another Scotland, another world: a declaration of radical intent. Ekklesia. www.ekklesia.co.uk/node/19517 (accessed 5 January 2018).Google Scholar

Beck, U. 2016. Varieties of second modernity and the cosmopolitan vision. Theory, Culture & Society, 33(7–8), 257–270.Google Scholar

Beck, S. 2019. Co-producing knowledge and politics of the Anthropocene: the case of the Future Earth program. In: Biermann, F. & LöVbrand, E. (eds.) Anthropocene Encounters: New Directions in Green Political Thinking. New York: Cambridge University Press, 191–211.Google Scholar

Belin, M.-Å., Tillgren, P. & Vedung, E. 2012. Vision Zero – a road safety policy innovation. International Journal of Injury Control & Safety Promotion, 19, 171–179.Google Scholar

Belin, M. Å., Vedung, E., Meleckidzedeck, K. & Tinfvall, C. 2014. Carrots, sticks and sermons: state policy tools for influencing adoption and acceptance of new vehicle safety systems. In: Regan, M. A., Horberry, T. & Stevens, A. (eds.) Driver Acceptance of New Technology: Theory, Measurement and Optimisation. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Ltd, 241–250.Google Scholar

Bell, D. R. 2005. Environmental learning, metaphors and natural capital. Environmental Education Research, 11, 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bergström, A. & Oscarsson, H. E. 2017. Svenska Trender 1986–2016. Göteborg: SOM-institutet, SOM-rapport, 32. https://som.gu.se/digitalAssets/1649/1649642_32-svenska-trender-1986-2016.pdf (accessed 22 September 2017).Google Scholar

Berinsky, A. J. & Kinder, D. R. 2006. Making sense of issues through media frames: understanding the Kosovo crisis. The Journal of Politics, 68, 640–656.Google Scholar

Bevir, M. 2013. Governance: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bezanson, A. 1922. The early use of the term industrial revolution. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 36, 343–349.Google Scholar

Biermann, F., Betsill, M., Gupta, J., et al. 2009. Earth System Governance: People, Places and the Planet. Science and Implementation Plan of the Earth System Governance Project. Bonn: IHDP, IHDP Report, 20.Google Scholar

Billig, M. 1996. Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Blackburn, R. 2011. The American Crucible: Slavery, Emancipation and Human Rights. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Bloomberg. 2015. UNESCO report rethinks education for the 21st Century. Bloomberg, 9 November 2015.Google Scholar

Bloomberg Philanthropies. 2015. The transformation imperative at climate summit for local leaders. YouTube. www.youtube.com/watch?v=inZabst6C8w (accessed 7 June 2016).Google Scholar

Blythe, J., Silver, J., Evans, L., et al. 2018. The dark side of transformation: latent risks in contemporary sustainability discourse. Antipode, 50, 1206–1223.Google Scholar

Bola, A. 2016. Potential for sustainable sea transport: a case study of the Southern Lomaiviti, Fiji islands. Marine Policy, 75, 260–270.Google Scholar

Bonfadelli, H. 2010. Environmental sustainability as challenge for media and journalism. In: Gross, M. & Heinrichs, H. (eds.) Environmental Sociology: European Perspectives and Interdisciplinary Challenges. Dordrecht: Springer, 257–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boserup, E. 1965. The Conditions of Agricultural Growth: The Economics of Agrarian Change under Population Pressure. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Boström, M., Andersson, E., Berg, M., et al. 2018. Conditions for transformative learning for sustainable development: a theoretical review and approach. Sustainability, 10, 4479.Google Scholar

Boyer, R. 1989. The Regulation School: A Critical Introduction. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Boykoff, M. T. 2007. Flogging a dead norm? Newspaper coverage of anthropogenic climate change in the United States and United Kingdom from 2003 to 2006. Area, 39, 470–481.Google Scholar

Boykoff, M. T. 2011. Who Speaks for the Climate? Making Sense of Media Reporting on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brand, U. 2016. ‘Transformation’ as a new critical orthodoxy: the strategic use of the term ‘transformation’ does not prevent multiple crises. GAIA, 25, 23–27.Google Scholar

Brandi, C., Dzebo, A., Janetschek, H., et al. 2017. NDC-SDG connections. German Development Institute, Stockholm Environment Institute. https://klimalog.die-gdi.de/ndc-sdg/ (accessed 1 June 2018).Google Scholar

Breisinger, C. & Diao, X. 2008. Economic transformation in theory and practice: what are the messages for Africa? International Food Policy Research, 797. Ideas. https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/ifprid/797.html (accessed 28 November 2017).Google Scholar

O’Brien, K. 2012. Global environmental change II: from adaptation to deliberate transformation. Progress in Human Geography, 36, 667–676.Google Scholar

O’Brien, K. 2018. Is the 1.5°C target possible? Exploring the three spheres of transformation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 31, 153–160.Google Scholar

O’Brien, K. & Sygna, L. 2013. Responding to climate change: the three spheres of transformation. Proceedings of Transformation in a Changing Climate. Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar

Brown, K., O’Neill, S. & Fabricius, C. 2013. Social science understandings of transformation. In: World Social Science Report 2013: Changing Global Environments. Paris: OECD Publishing and UNESCO Publishing.Google Scholar

Bryman, A. 2006. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qualitative Research, 6, 97–113.Google Scholar

Brynjolfsson, E. & McAfee, A. 2014. The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. New York: WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar

Bundeskanzlerin. 2017. Speech by Federal Chancellor Dr. Angela Merkel at COP23 in Bonn on 15 November 2017.Google Scholar

Burch, S., Shaw, A., Dale, A. & Robinson, J. 2014. Triggering transformative change: a development path approach to climate change response in communities. Climate Policy, 14, 467–487.Google Scholar

Burke, M. J. & Stephens, J. C. 2017. Political power and renewable energy futures: a critical review. Energy Research & Social Science, 35, 78–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butzer, K. W. 2012. Collapse, environment, and society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 3632–3639.Google Scholar

Butzer, K. W. & Endfield, G. H. 2012. Critical perspectives on historical collapse. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 3628–3631.Google Scholar

Buzan, B. & Lawson, G. 2015. The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, J. (ed.). 2003. The Hero’s Journey: Joseph Campbell on His Life and Work. Novato, CA: New World Library.Google Scholar

Campbell, J. 2008. The Hero with a Thousand Faces. Novato, CA: New World Library.Google Scholar

Caporaso, J. A. & Levine, D. P. 1992. Theories of Political Economy, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Capstick, S. B. & Pidgeon, N. F. 2014. What is climate change scepticism? Examination of the concept using a mixed methods study of the UK public. Global Environmental Change, 24, 389–401.Google Scholar

Carew, A. L. & Mitchell, C. A. 2006. Metaphors used by some engineering academics in Australia for understanding and explaining sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 12, 217–231.Google Scholar

Cashore, B. & Howlett, M. 2007. Punctuating which equilibrium? Understanding thermostatic policy dynamics in Pacific Northwest forestry. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 532–551.Google Scholar

Castree, N. 2010. Neoliberalism and the biophysical environment 2: theorising the neoliberalisation of nature. Geography Compass, 4, 1734–1746.Google Scholar

Central Intelligence Agency. 2017. The world factbook. Central Intelligence Agency. www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/cv.html (accessed 29 October 2017).Google Scholar

Chang, K. 2010. The second modern condition? Compressed modernity as internalized reflexive cosmopolitization. British Journal of Sociology, 61, 444–464.Google Scholar

Chappin, E. J. L. & Ligtvoet, A. 2014. Transition and transformation: a bibliometric analysis of two scientific networks researching socio-technical change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30, 715–723.Google Scholar

Charteris-Black, J. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Chen, H.-T. 2005. Practical Program Evaluation: Assessing and Improving Planning, Implementation, and Effectiveness. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Chettiparamb, A. 2006. Metaphors in complexity theory and planning. Planning Theory, 5, 71–91.Google Scholar

Chilton, P. & Ilyin, M. 1993. Metaphor in political discourse: the case of the ‘common European house’. Discourse & Society, 4, 7–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cipolla, C. M. 1976. Introduction to the Industrial Revolution 1700–1914. In: Cipolla, C. M. (ed.) The Fontana Economic History of Europe. New York: Harvester Press Barnes and Noble, 7–21.Google Scholar

City of Boulder. 2018. Boulder’s climate commitment. City of Boulder. https://bouldercolorado.gov/climate (accessed 20 June 2018).Google Scholar

Clarke, L., Akimoto, K., Jiang, K., et al. 2014. Assessing transformation pathways. In: Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R. & Sokona, Y. (eds.) Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ipcc_wg3_ar5_chapter6.pdf.Google Scholar

Clean Tech Östergötland. 2018. Miljöteknik. Clean Tech Östergötland. http://cleantechostergotland.se/miljoteknik/ (accessed 20 June 2018).Google Scholar

Cohen, B. C. 1963. The Press and Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, M. J. 2011. Is the UK preparing for ‘war’? Military metaphors, personal carbon allowances, and consumption rationing in historical perspective. Climatic Change, 104, 199–222.Google Scholar

Conceição, P. 2019. Fear and loathing of technological progress? Leveraging science and innovation for the implementation of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. In: Baimenoy, A. & Liverakos, P. (eds.) Public Service Excellence in the 21st Century. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Corner, A. 2015. We need our leaders to speak out on climate change, not stay silent. The Guardian, 27 April 2015. www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2015/apr/27/we-need-our-leaders-to-speak-out-on-climate-change-not-stay-silent (accessed 20 November 2017).Google Scholar

Crafts, N. 2010. Explaining the first Industrial Revolution: two views. European Review of Economic History, 15, 153–168.Google Scholar

Cronon, W. 1992. A place for stories: nature, history, and narrative. The Journal of American History, 78, 1347–1376.Google Scholar

Crowell, S. & Reid-Marr, D. 2013. Emergent Teaching: A Path of Creativity, Significance, and Transformation. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.Google Scholar

Curtin, P. D. 1969. The Atlantic Slave Trade: A Census. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Davis, D. B. 2006. Inhuman Bondage: The Rise and Fall of Slavery in the New World. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

DDPP. 2017. Deep decarbonisaiton pathways project research approach. DDPP. http://deepdecarbonization.org (accessed 29 October 2017).Google Scholar

De Carvalho, J. M. C. 2013. Elaboration of the Third International Conference on Sustainable Development in Small Island States in Development. Republic of Cape Verde United Nations Development Programme National Report. Praia: UNDP Republic of Cape Verde.Google Scholar

De Haan, J. H. & Rotmans, J. 2011. Patterns in transitions: understanding complex chains of change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78, 90–102.Google Scholar

De Vries, J. 1994. The Industrial Revolution and the Industrious Revolution. The Journal of Economic History, 54, 249–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deacon, B. 2014. Toward a Transformative Global Social Policy? In: Kaasch, A. & Stubbs, P. (eds.) Transformations in Global and Regional Social Policies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 201–217.Google Scholar

Dentoni, D., Waddell, S. & Waddock, S. 2017. Pathways of transformation in global food and agricultural systems: implications from a large systems change theory perspective. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 29, 8–13.Google Scholar

Dervin, B. 1998. Sense‐making theory and practice: an overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2, 36–46.Google Scholar

Diamond, J. 2005. Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Dicke, W. M. 2001. Bridges and Watersheds: A Narrative Analysis of Water Management in England, Wales and the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Aksant Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Doulton, H. & Brown, K. 2009. Ten years to prevent catastrophe? Discourses of climate change and international development in the UK press. Global Environmental Change, 19, 191–202.Google Scholar

Drescher, S. 2009. Abolition: A History of Slavery and Antislavery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Driessen, P. P. J., Behagel, J. H., Hegger, D. L. T., et al. 2013. Societal transformations in the face of climate change: research priorities for the next decade. www.jpi-climate.eu/media/default.aspx/emma/org/10829915/Paper+Societal+transformations+in+the+face+of+climate+change+-+April+2013+JPI+Climate.pdf (accessed 22 September 2017).Google Scholar

Duit, A., Feindt, P. H. & Meadowcroft, J. 2015. Greening Leviathan: the rise of the environmental state? Environmental Politics, 25, 1–23.Google Scholar

Durant, R. F. & Diehl, P. F. 1989. Agendas, alternatives, and public policy: lessons from the US foreign policy arena. Journal of Public Policy, 9, 179–205.Google Scholar

Eckersley, R. 2004. The Green State: Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

EEA. 2017. Perspectives on Transitions to Sustainability. Copenhagen: European Energy Agency, EEA Report No 25/2017.Google Scholar

Élysée. 2018. Speech of the President of the Republic, Emmanuel Macron. Before the Congress of the United States of America, www.elysee.fr/emmanuel-macron/2018/04/25/speech-by-the-president-of-the-republic-emmanuel-macron-at-the-congress-of-the-united-states-of-america.en (accessed 5 June 2019).Google Scholar

Entman, R. M. 1993. Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51–58.Google Scholar

Essa, A. 2015. Mother–infant health progress requires no magic. Al Jazeera, 20 October 2015. www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2015/10/qa-mother-infant-health-progress-requires-magic-151020155900987.html (accessed 15 October 2017).Google Scholar

European Commission. 2017. Special Eurobarometer 459 ‘Climate Change’. Brussels: European Commission, Wave EB 87.1. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/support/docs/report_2017_en.pdf (accessed 29 October 2017).Google Scholar

European Commission. 2018. In-depth analysis in support of the commission communication COM(2018) 773 A Clean Planet for all: a European long-term strategic vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/knowledge4policy/publication/depth-analysis-support-com2018-773-clean-planet-all-european-strategic-long-term-vision_en (accessed 4 March 2019).Google Scholar

Farrelly, T. & Nabobo‐Baba, U. 2014. Talanoa as empathic apprenticeship. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 55, 319–330.Google Scholar

Fazey, I., Moug, P., Allen, S., et al. 2018. Transformation in a changing climate: a research agenda. Climate and Development, 10, 197–217.Google Scholar

Featherstone, M. 2004. Automobilities. Theory, Culture & Society 21, 1–24.Google Scholar

Feay, T. 2012. Creating ‘The People of God’: French utopian dreams and the moralization of Africans and slaves. In: White, O. & Daughton, J. P. (eds.) In God’s Empire: French Missionaries in the Modern World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 47–66.Google Scholar

Feola, G. 2015. Societal transformation in response to global environmental change: a review of emerging concepts. Ambio, 44, 376–390.Google Scholar

Ferdinand, P. 2016. Westward ho – the China dream and ‘one belt, one road’: Chinese foreign policy under Xi Jinping. International Affairs, 92, 941–957.Google Scholar

Filipe, A., Renedo, A. & Marston, C. 2017. The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biology, 15, e2001403.Google Scholar

Flood, R. L. 2002. Rethinking the Fifth Discipline: Learning within the Unknowable. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., et al. 2010. Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society, 15, 20.Google Scholar

Frank, A. G. & Gills, B. 1993. The World Systems: Five Hundred Years or Five Thousand? London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Frankfurt School – UNEP Collaborating Centre for Climate & Sustainable Energy Finance. 2016. Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment 2016. Frankfurt am Main: Frankfurt School of Finance & Management.Google Scholar

Franz, H.-W., Hochgerner, J. & Howaldt, J. R. 2012. Challenge Social Innovation: Potentials for Business, Social Entrepreneurship, Welfare and Civil Society. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Fridahl, M. & Johansson, L. 2017. An assessment of the potential for spurring transformational change through Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs). Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 25, 35–46.Google Scholar

Fried, C. 2011. The 10 Happiest (and Saddest) Cities in the U.S. Moneywatch, 24 March 2011. www.cbsnews.com/news/the-10-happiest-and-saddest-cities-in-the-us (accessed 20 June 2018).Google Scholar

Friedman, K. E. & Friedman, J. 2008. Historical Transformations: The Anthropology of Global Systems. Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.Google Scholar

Fuhr, L. 2016a. Climate change realism. Arab News, 7 November 2016. www.arabnews.com/node/1007476/columns (accessed 7 November 2016).Google Scholar

Fuhr, L. 2016b. Radical realism about climate change. The Gulf Times, 9 November 2016. www.gulf-times.com/story/520607/Radical-realism-about-global-climate-change (accessed 9 November 2016).Google Scholar

Fuhr, L. 2016c. Radical realism about climate change. The Jordan Times, 7 November 2017. http://jordantimes.com/opinion/lili-fuhr/radical-realism-about-climate-change (accessed 16 November 2017).Google Scholar

Furtado, C. A. 2014. Social movements in Cabo Verde: processes, trends and vicissitudes. In: Sylla, N. S. (ed.) Liberalism and Its Discontents: Social Movements in West Africa. Dakar: Rosa Luxemburg Foundation, 419–461.Google Scholar

Future Earth. 2014. Future Earth 2025 Vision. Paris: Future Earth Interim Secretariat. www.futureearth.org/sites/default/files/future-earth_10-year-vision_web.pdf (accessed 5 December 2017).Google Scholar

Future Earth. 2015. Transformation towards sustainability. Future Earth. www.futureearth.org/themes/transformations-towards-sustainability (accessed 16 May 2018).Google Scholar

Future Earth. 2016. What is Future Earth? Future Earth. https://network.futureearth.org/about/aboutfe (accessed 20 June 2018).Google Scholar

Gamson, W. & Modigliani, A. 1987. The changing culture of affirmative action. In: Braungart, M. & Braungart, R. G. (eds.) Research in Political Sociology: A Research Annual. Greenwich, CT: Jai Press, 137–177.Google Scholar

Gardiner, A., Bosquet, M., Van Tilburg, X. & Harms, N. 2015. Annual Status Report on Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs). Cologne: Mitigation Momentum. www.mitigationmomentum.org/downloads/Mitigation_Momentum_Annual_Status_Report_Dec_2015.pdf (accessed 15 April 2015).Google Scholar

Garfield, L. 2018. 13 cities that are starting to ban cars. Business Insider, 1 June 2018. www.businessinsider.com/cities-going-car-free-ban-2017-8?r=US&IR=T (accessed 5 August 2018).Google Scholar

Geels, F. W. & Schot, J. 2010. Introduction: exploration of the research topic. In: Grin, J., Rotmans, J., Geels, F. W., et al. (eds.) Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change. New York: Routledge, 11–17.Google Scholar

Geertz, C. 1993. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. London: Fontana Press.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Policy Press.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. 2009. The Politics of Climate Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Gillard, R., Gouldson, A., Paavola, J. & Van Alstine, J. 2016. Transformational responses to climate change: beyond a systems perspective of social change in mitigation and adaptation. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7, 251–265.Google Scholar

Gilpin, R. 2016. The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Gitlin, T. & Kinniburgh, C. 2016. The climate after Paris: introducing our spring issue. Dissent Magazine, 4 April 2016. www.dissentmagazine.org/article/dissent-climate-justice-introduction-after-paris (accessed 11 November 2017).Google Scholar

Global Commission on the Geopolitics of Energy Transformation. 2019. A New World: The Geopolitics of the Energy Transformation. Abu Dhabi: The Secretariat of the Global Commission on the Geopolitics of Energy Transformation.Google Scholar

Goatly, A. 2011. The Language of Metaphors. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Göpel, M. 2016. The Great Mindshift: How a New Economic Paradigm and Sustainability Transformations Go Hand in Hand. Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar

Gordon, R. J. 2016. The Rise and Fall of American Growth: The US Standard of Living since the Civil War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Government of Bangladesh. 2017. Eradicating Poverty and Promoting Prosperity in a Changing World. Dhaka: Government of Bangladesh. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/15826Bangladesh.pdf (accessed 29 October 2017).Google Scholar

Government of Sweden. 2015. The goal is a fossil-free Sweden. Government Offices of Sweden. www.government.se/information-material/2015/11/the-goal-is-a-fossil-free-sweden (accessed 20 June 2018).Google Scholar

Government of Sweden. 2016. Genomförande av Agenda 2030 för hållbar utveckling. Kommittédirektiv 2016:18. Stockholm: Government of Sweden.Google Scholar

Groom, B. 2013. The wisdom of horse manure. Financial Times, 2 September 2013. www.ft.com/content/238b1038-13bb-11e3-9289-00144feabdc0 (accessed 8 October 2018).Google Scholar

Grubb, M., Rayner, S., Tanabe, A., et al. 1991. Energy policies and the greenhouse effect: a study of national differences. Energy Policy, 19, 911–917.Google Scholar

Grunwald, A. 2007. Working towards sustainable development in the face of uncertainty and incomplete knowledge. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9, 245–262.Google Scholar

Habib, A. & Bawa, A. 2016. Survival of universities requires realism on fees. Times Live South Africa, 17 July 2016. www.timeslive.co.za/sunday-times/opinion-and-analysis/2016–07-17-survival-of-universities-requires-realism-on-fees/ (accessed 8 November 2017).Google Scholar

Hackmann, H. & Moser, S. 2013. Social sciences in a changing global environment: general introduction. In: International Social Science Council and UNESCO (ed.) World Social Science Report 2013: Changing Global Environments. Paris: OECD Publishing and UNESCO.Google Scholar

Hagelsteen, M. & Becker, P. 2013. Challenging disparities in capacity development for disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 3, 4–13.Google Scholar

Halapua, S. 2008. Talanoa Process: The Case of Fiji. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/UN/UNPAN022610.pdf (accessed 20 June 2018).Google Scholar

Hansen, A. & Doyle, J. 2011. Communicating the environment: guest editors’ introduction. International Communication Gazette, 73, 3–6.Google Scholar

Harré, R., Brockmeier, J. & Mühlhäusler, P. 1999. Greenspeak: A Study of Environmental Discourse. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Harvey, D. 1990. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hassall, G. 2005. Using multi-stakeholder dialogue as a social transformation tool: the case of Fiji. United Nations Expert Group Meeting entitled Dialogue in the Social Integration Process: Building Peaceful Social Relations – By, For, and With People, 21–23 November 2005, New York.Google Scholar

Hedlund-de Witt, A. 2012. Exploring worldviews and their relationships to sustainable lifestyles: towards a new conceptual and methodological approach. Ecological Economics, 84, 74–83.Google Scholar

Hellsten, I., Porter, A. J. & Nerlich, B. 2014. Imagining the future at the global and national scale: a comparative study of British and Dutch press coverage of Rio 1992 and Rio 2012. Environmental Communication, 8, 468–488.Google Scholar

Henning, K. 2018. How artificial intelligence changes the world. In: Karafilidis, A. & Weidner, R. (eds.) Developing Support Technologies. Biosystems & Biorobotics, 23. Cham: Springer, 277–284.Google Scholar

Hennink, M. M. 2014. Focus Group Discussions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hildingsson, R. 2014. Governing Decarbonisation: The State and the New Politics of Climate Change. Lund: Department of Political Science, Lund University.Google Scholar

Hjerpe, M., Glaas, E. & Fenton, P. 2017. The role of knowledge in climate transition and transformation literatures. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 29, 26–31.Google Scholar

Hjerpe, M. & Linnér, B.-O. 2012. Utopian thought as a missed opportunity and leverage point for systemic change. In: Pelling, M., Manuel-Navarret, D. & Redclift, M. (eds.) Climate Change and the Crisis of Capitalism: A Chance to Reclaim Self, Society and Nature. London: Routledge, 159–172.Google Scholar

HKTDC. 2017. Guangzhou (Guangdong) city information. HKTDC. http://china-trade-research.hktdc.com/business-news/article/Facts-and-Figures/Guangzhou-Guangdong-City-Information/ff/en/1/1X000000/1X09VTH4.htm (accessed 26 October 2017).Google Scholar

Hobsbawm, E. 1962. The Age of Revolution 1789–1848. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar

Hochschild, A. 2005. Bury the Chains: Prophets and Rebels in the Fight to Free an Empire’s Slaves. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar

Holden, E., Linnerud, K. & Banister, D. 2014. Sustainable development: our common future revisited. Global Environmental Change, 26, 130–139.Google Scholar

Holt, D. & Barkemeyer, R. 2012. Media coverage of sustainable development issues – attention cycles or punctuated equilibrium? Sustainable Development, 20, 1–17.Google Scholar

Hopwood, B., Mellor, M. & O’Brien, G. 2005. Sustainable development: mapping different approaches. Sustainable Development, 13, 38–52.Google Scholar

Horlings, L. G. 2015. The inner dimension of sustainability: personal and cultural values. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 163–169.Google Scholar

Hornborg, A. 2016. Global Magic: Technologies of Appropriation from Ancient Rome to Wall Street. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Howie, P. & Bagnall, R. 2013. A beautiful metaphor: transformative learning theory. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 32, 816–836.Google Scholar

Hultman, M. & Nordlund, C. 2013. Energizing technology: expectations of fuel cells and the hydrogen economy, 1990–2005. History and Technology: An International Journal, 29, 33–53.Google Scholar

Humanes, P. 2016. Why cities need mobility disruptive technologies. PTV Compass Blog. http://compass.ptvgroup.com/2016/10/why-cities-need-mobility-disruptive-technologies/?lang=en (accessed 8 October 2017).Google Scholar

Husband, J. & O’Loughlin, J. 2004. Daily Life in the Industrial United States, 1870–1900. Westport, CA: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

Hydén, L.-C. & Bülow, P. H. 2003. Who’s talking: drawing conclusions from focus groups – some methodological considerations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6, 305–321.Google Scholar

Hydén, L.-C. & Hydén, M. (eds.). 1997. Att studera berättelser: Samhällsvetenskapliga och medicinska perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.Google Scholar

Hölscher, K., Wittmayer, J. M. & Loorbach, D. 2018. Transition versus transformation: what’s the difference? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 27, 1–3.Google Scholar

Ihedioha, E. 2015. Legislature as instrument of social change. The Guardian Nigeria, 10 February 2015. https://guardian.ng/features/focus/legislature-as-instrument-of-social-change (accessed 08 November 2017).Google Scholar

Ihlen, Ø. & Roper, J. 2011. Corporate reports on sustainability and sustainable development: ‘we have arrived’. Sustainable Development, 22, 42–51.Google Scholar

International Labour Organization. 2015. Guidelines for a just transition towards environmentally sustainable economies and societies for all. International Labour Organization. www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/---emp_ent/documents/publication/wcms_432859.pdf (accessed 7 March 2019).Google Scholar

IPBES. 2019. Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Brondizio, E. S., Settele, J., Díaz, S., and Ngo, H. T. (eds.). Bonn: IPBES Secretariat.Google Scholar

IPCC. 2018. Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C above Pre-Industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty. Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pörtner, H.-O., et al. (eds.). Geneva: World Meteorological Organization.Google Scholar

ISSC & ICSU. 2015. Review of Targets for the Sustainable Development Goals: The Science Perspective. Paris: International Council for Science (ICSU).Google Scholar

ITU. 2018. Measuring the Information Society Report 2018, volume 1. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union. www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/misr2018.aspx (accessed 7 March 2019).Google Scholar

Jack, A. 2015. Experts divided over value of UN Sustainable Development Goals. Financial Times, 15 September 2015. www.ft.com/content/1ac2384c-57bf-11e5-9846-de406ccb37f2 (accessed 9 November 2017).Google Scholar

Jernnäs, M & Linnér, B.-O. 2019. A discursive cartography of Nationally Determined Contributions to the Paris Climate Agreement. Global Environmental Change, 55: 73–83.Google Scholar

Johnson, B. 2015. The Great Horse Manure Crisis of 1894. Historic UK Ltd. www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofBritain/Great-Horse-Manure-Crisis-of-1894/ (accessed 8 October 2017).Google Scholar

Kaczmarski, M. 2017. Non-western visions of regionalism: China’s new Silk Road and Russia’s Eurasian economic union. International Affairs, 93, 1357–1376.Google Scholar

Kahane, A. 2012. Transformative Scenario Planning: Working Together to Change the Future. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar

Kaijser, A. 2013. Who Is Marching for Pachamama? An Intersectional Analysis of Environmental Struggles in Bolivia under the Government of Evo Morales. Diss:Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies.Google Scholar

Kanie, N. & Biermann, F. 2017. Governing through Goals: Sustainable Development Goals as Governance Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kates, R. W., Travis, W. R. & Wilbanks, T. J. 2012. Transformational adaptation when incremental adaptations to climate change are insufficient. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 7156–7161.Google Scholar

Keim, B. 2013. Did cars save our cities from horses? Debating a modern parable about waste and technology. NautilusThink Inc. http://nautil.us/issue/7/waste/did-cars-save-our-cities-from-horses (accessed 4 October 2017).Google Scholar

Kemp, R. & Never, B. 2017. Green transition, industrial policy, and economic development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33, 66–84.Google Scholar

Kemp, R., Schot, J. & Hoogma, R. 1998. Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10, 175–198.Google Scholar

Kenis, A., Bono, F. & Mathijs, E. 2016. Unravelling the (post-)political in transition management: interrogating pathways towards sustainable change. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18, 568–584.Google Scholar

Kitolelei, J. V. & Sato, T. 2016. Analysis of perceptions and knowledge in managing coastal resources: a case study in Fiji. Frontiers in Marine Science, 3, 1–12.Google Scholar

Kolbert, E. 2009. Hosed. Is there a quick fix for the climate? The New Yorker, 16 November 2009. www.newyorker.com/magazine/2009/11/16/hosed (accessed 2 October 2017).Google Scholar

Koteyko, N. & Ryazanova-Clarke, L. 2009. The path and building metaphors in the speeches of Vladimir Putin: back to the future? Slavonica, 15, 112–127.Google Scholar

Koteyko, N., Thelwall, M. & Nerlich, B. 2010. From carbon markets to carbon morality: creative compounds as framing devices in online discourses on climate change mitigation. Science Communication, 32, 25–54.Google Scholar

Krueger, R. A. 1998. Analyzing & Reporting Focus Group Results. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.Google Scholar

Kuenkel, P. 2019. Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar

Kuhnle, S. 2015. Add a Nordic touch to China’s welfare society. China Daily Europe, 7 November 2015. www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2015-11/07/content_22394699.htm (accessed 08 November 2017).Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kumar, K. 1978. Prophecy and Progress: The Sociology of Industrial and Post-Industrial Society. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Kumar, K. 1999. Utopianism. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Kumar, K. 2003. Aspects of the western utopian tradition. History of the Human Sciences, 16, 63–77.Google Scholar

Kuyper, J. W., Linnér, B.-O. & Schroeder, H. 2018. Non‐state actors in hybrid global climate governance: justice, legitimacy, and effectiveness in a post‐Paris era. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 9, e497.Google Scholar

Labov, W. 1972. Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Laes, E., Gorissen, L. & Nevens, F. 2014. A comparison of energy transition governance in Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Sustainability, 6, 1129–1152.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In: Ortony, A. (ed.) Metaphor and Thought, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. 2010. Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication, 4, 70–81.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Leggewie, C. & Messner, D. 2012. The low-carbon transformation – a social science perspective. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 4, 041404.Google Scholar

Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E. W., Roser-Renouf, C., Rosenthal, S. & Myers, T. 2019. Global warming’s six Americas. Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. http://climatecommunication.yale.edu/about/projects/global-warmings-six-americas (accessed 22 March 2019).Google Scholar

Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S. & Auld, G. 2012. Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences, 45, 123–152.Google Scholar

Levitt, S. D. & Dubner, S. J. 2009. Superfreakonomics: Global Cooling, Patriotic Prostitutes and Why Suicide Bombers Should Buy Life Insurance. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Liberia. 2013. Agenda for transformation: steps toward Liberia RISING 2030. https://governancecommissionlr.org/doc_download/AfT%20document-%20April%2015,%202013.pdf?a4705305cd27e04fb1f66830e7e0ef9d=NzE%3D (accessed 25 November 2017).Google Scholar

Lilley, S., Mcnally, D., Yuen, E. & Davis, J. 2012. Catastrophism: The Apocalyptic Politics of Collapse and Rebirth, Oakland, CA: PM Press.Google Scholar

Lindgren, A. 1958. Astrid Lindgren speech held at the reception of the H C Andersen Award: everything great that ever happened in this world happened first in somebody’s imagination. Astrid Lingren Company. www.astridlindgren.com/en (accessed 4 June 2018).Google Scholar

Linell, P. 1998. Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar

Linell, P. 2001. A dialogical conception of focus groups and social representations. In: Sätterlund Larsson, U. (ed.) Socio-Cultural Theory and Methods: An Anthology. Trollhättan: University of Trollhättan/Uddevalla: Department of Nursing.Google Scholar

Linell, P. 2009. Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Linnér, B.-O. 2003. The Return of Malthus: Environmentalism and Postwar Population-Resource Crises. Cambridge: White Horse Press.Google Scholar

Linnér, B.-O. 2005. Att lära för överlevnad: utbildningsprogrammen och miljöfrågorna 1962–2002. Lund: Arkiv förlag.Google Scholar

Linnér, B.-O., Mickwitz, P. & Román, M. 2012. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions through development policies: a framework for analysing policy interventions. Climate and Development, 4, 175–186.Google Scholar

Linnér, B.-O. & Rayner, S. 2015. Innovation investments. In: Bäckstrand, K. & Lövbrand, E. (eds.) Research Handbook on Climate Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 547–554.Google Scholar

Linnér, B.-O. & Selin, H. 2013. The United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development: forty years in the making. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31, 971–987.Google Scholar

Linnér, B. O. & Wibeck, V. 2015. Dual high‐stake emerging technologies: a review of the climate engineering research literature. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6, 255–268.Google Scholar

Lippuner, R. & Werlen, B. 2009. Structuration theory. In: Kitchin, R. & Thrift, N. (eds.) International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Liu, Z., Guan, D., Moore, S., et al. 2015. Steps to China’s carbon peak. Nature, 522, 279–281.Google Scholar

Lockwood, M. 2015. The political dynamics of green transformations: feedback effects in institutional context. In: Scoones, I., Leach, M. & Newell, P. (eds.) The Politics of Green Transformations. London: Routledge, 86–101.Google Scholar

Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S. & Whitmarsh, L. 2007. Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change, 17, 445–459.Google Scholar

Lövbrand, E. & Linnér, B.-O. 2015. Governing beyond or with the state? State conceptions in studies of non-state climate action. In: Bäckstrand, K. & Kronsell, A. (eds.) Rethinking the Green State: Environmental Governance towards Climate and Sustainability Transitions. New York: Routledge, 43–62.Google Scholar

Lu, L. W.-L. & Ahrens, K. 2008. Ideological influence on building metaphors in Taiwanese presidential speeches. Discourse & Society, 19, 383–408.Google Scholar

Maasen, S. & Weingart, P. 2000. Metaphors and the Dynamics of Knowledge. London:Routledge.Google Scholar

Maddison, A. 1982. Phases of Capitalist Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Maibach, E. W., Nisbet, M., Baldwin, P., Akerlof, K. & Diao, G. 2010. Reframing climate change as a public health issue: an exploratory study of public reactions. BMC Public Health, 10, 299–309.Google Scholar

Månberger, A. & Stenqvist, B. 2018. Global metal flows in the renewable energy transition: exploring the effects of substitutes, technological mix and development. Energy Policy, 119, 226–241.Google Scholar

Månsson, A. 2015. A resource curse for renewables? Conflict and cooperation in the renewable energy sector. Energy Research & Social Science, 10, 1–9.Google Scholar

Markard, J., Raven, R. & Truffer, B. 2012. Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41, 955–967.Google Scholar

Marketwired. 2016. Hitachi Sets Data Free to Give Copenhagen Smart City Insights. Copenhagen: Marketwired. www.marketwatch.com/press-release/hitachi-sets-data-free-to-give-copenhagen-smart-city-insights-2016-05-18 (accessed 3 March 2018).Google Scholar

Marková, I. 1996. Towards an epistemology of social representations. Journal for the Theory of Social behaviour, 26, 177–196.Google Scholar

Marková, I., Linell, P., Grossen, M. & Salazar Orvig, A. 2007. Dialogue in Focus Groups: Exploring in Socially Shared Knowledge. London: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar

Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pörtner, H.-O., et al. (eds.). 2018. Global Warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C above Pre-Industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization.Google Scholar

Mauser, W., Klepper, G., Rice, M., et al. 2013. Transdisciplinary global change research: the co-creation of knowledge for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5, 420–431.Google Scholar

Mayhew, A. 2000. Review of Karl Polanyi, ‘The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time’. EH Net Economic History Services. https://eh.net/book_reviews/the-great-transformation-the-political-and-economic-origins-of-our-time (accessed 2 April 2017).Google Scholar

McCombs, M. E. & Shaw, D. L. 1972. The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176–187.Google Scholar

Mcentee-Atalianis, L. J. 2011. The role of metaphor in shaping the identity and agenda of the United Nations: the imagining of an international community and international threat. Discourse & Communication, 5, 393–412.Google Scholar

McNeill, J. R. 2001. Something New under the Sun: An Environmental History of the Twentieth-Century World. New York: WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar

Mcshane, C. 1995. Down the Asphalt Path: The Automobile and the American City. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Mcshane, C. & Tarr, J. 2003. The decline of the urban horse in American cities. The Journal of Transport History, 24, 177–198.Google Scholar

Mcshane, C. & Tarr, J. A. 2007. The Horse in the City: Living Machines in the Nineteenth Century, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Meadowcroft, J. 2011. Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1, 70–75.Google Scholar

Meadows, D. 1999. Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System. Hartland, VT:Sustainability Institute.Google Scholar

Meadows, D. H. 2008. Thinking in Systems: A Primer. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Mezirow, J. 1991. Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Mezirow, J. 2000. Learning as Transformation: Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Mickwitz, P. 2006. Environmental Policy Evaluation: Concepts and Practice. Helsinki: The Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters.Google Scholar

Miller, J. H. & Page, S. E. 2007. Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Milne, M. J., Kearins, K. & Walton, S. 2006. Creating Adventures in Wonderland: the journey metaphor and environmental sustainability. Organization, 13, 801–839.Google Scholar

Mitchell, T. 2011. Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Mokyr, J. 2009. The Enlightened Economy: An Economic History of Britain 1700-1850. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Morgan, D. L. 1997. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Morgan, D. L. 2012. Focus groups and social interaction. In: Gubrium, J., Holstein, J., Marvasti, A. & Mckinney, K. (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft, 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 161–176.Google Scholar

Morris, I. 2010. Why the West Rules – for Now: The Patterns of History and What They Reveal about the Future. New York: Picador.Google Scholar

Mühlhäusler, P. & Peace, A. 2006. Environmental discourses. Annual Review of Anthropology, 35, 457–479.Google Scholar

Musolff, A. 2000. Political imagery of Europe: a house without exit doors? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 21, 216–229.Google Scholar

Nalau, J. & Handmer, J. 2015. When is transformation a viable policy alternative? Environmental Science & Policy, 54, 349–356.Google Scholar

Nansai, K., Nakajima, K., Kagawa, S., et al. 2015. Global mining risk footprint of critical metals necessary for low-carbon technologies: the case of neodymium, cobalt, and platinum in Japan. Environmental Science & Technology, 49, 2022–2031.Google Scholar

Nasiritousi, N., Hjerpe, M. & Linnér, B.-O. 2016. The roles of non-state actors in climate change governance: understanding agency through governance profiles. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16, 35–77.Google Scholar

National Secretariat of Planning and Development. 2013. National Plan for Good Living, 2013–2017: Summarized Version. Quito: National Secretariat of Planning and Development (Senplades). www.planificacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2013/12/Buen-Vivir-ingles-web-final-completo.pdf (accessed 10 October 2017).Google Scholar

Nature. 2014. Global scientific output doubles every nine years. Nature Publishing Group. http://blogs.nature.com/news/2014/05/global-scientific-output-doubles-every-nine-years.html (accessed 19 December 2017).Google Scholar

Naughten, D. 2016. What difference can Ireland really make on climate change? The Irish Times, 7 December 2016. www.irishtimes.com/opinion/what-difference-can-ireland-really-make-on-climate-change-1.2896365 (accessed 8 November 2017).Google Scholar

Nerlich, B. & Jaspal, R. 2012. Metaphors we die by? Geoengineering, metaphors, and the argument from catastrophe. Metaphor and Symbol, 27, 131–147.Google Scholar

Nilsson, M., Eklund, M. & Tyskeng, S. 2009. Environmental integration and policy implementation: competing governance modes in waste management decision making. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27, 1–18.Google Scholar

Nisbet, M. C. 2009. Communicating climate change: why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51, 12–23.Google Scholar

Nisbet, M. C. & Scheufele, D. A. 2009. What’s Next for Science Communication? Promising Directions and Lingering Distractions. American Journal of Botany, 96, 1767–1778.Google Scholar

Nordin, N. & Norman, H. 2018. Mapping the fourth industrial revolution global transformations on 21st century education on the context of sustainable development. Journal of Sustainable Development Education and Research, 1, 1–7.Google Scholar

Northup, L. A. 2006. Myth-placed priorities: religion and the study of myth. Religious Studies Review, 32, 5–10.Google Scholar

Norton, P. D., Bijker, W. E., Carlson, W. B. & Pinch, T. 2008. Fighting Traffic: The Dawn of the Motor Age in the American City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Noy, I. 2016. Tropical storms: the socio-economics of cyclone. Nature Climate Change, 6, 343–345.Google Scholar

O’Neill, S. & Nicholson-Cole, S. 2009. ‘Fear won’t do it’: promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication, 30, 355–379.Google Scholar

OCHA. 2014. Fiji: building resilience in the face of climate change. OCHA. www.unocha.org/story/fiji-building-resilience-face-climate-change (accessed 20 June 2018).Google Scholar

OECD. 2006. The Challenge of Capacity Development: Working towards Good Practice. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar

OECD. 2017. Investing in Climate, Investing in Growth. Paris: OECD. DCD/DAC/GOVNET(2005)5/REV1. www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264273528-en.pdf?expires=1559771309&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=D955ADF79FEBB42E3683AD34F1E4CAE8 (accessed 1 December 2017).Google Scholar

Ojala, M. 2012. Hope and climate change: the importance of hope for environmental engagement among young people. Environmental Education Research, 18, 625–642.Google Scholar

Ojala, M. 2015. Hope in the face of climate change: associations with environmental engagement and student perceptions of teachers’ emotion communication style and future orientation. The Journal of Environmental Education, 46, 133–148.Google Scholar

Olausson, U. 2011. ‘We’re the ones to blame’: citizens’ representations of climate change and the role of the media. Environmental Communication, 5, 281–299.Google Scholar

Olsson, P., Bodin, Ö. & Folke, C. 2010. Building transformative capacity for ecosystem stewardship in social–ecological systems. In: Plummer, R. & Armitage, D. (eds.) Adaptive Capacity and Environmental Governance. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Olsson, P., Moore, M. L., Westley, F. R. & Mccarthy, D. D. P. 2017. The concept of the Anthropocene as a game-changer: a new context for social innovation and transformations to sustainability. Ecology and Society, 22, 31.Google Scholar

Orsato, R. J. & Wells, P. 2007. U-turn: the rise and demise of the automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 994–1006.Google Scholar

Osterhammel, J. 2014. The Transformation of the World: A Global History of the Nineteenth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Pacific Islands Development Forum Secretariat. 2015. Suva Declaration on Climate Change. Suva: Pacific Islands Development Forum Secretariat.Google Scholar

Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat. 2015. Pacific Regional MDGs Tracking Report. Suva: Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat.Google Scholar

Painter, N. I. 2006. Creating Black Americans: African-American History and Its Meanings, 1619 to the Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pappas, I. O., Mikalef, P., Giannakos, M. N., Krogstie, J. & Lekakos, G. 2018. Big data and business analytics ecosystems: paving the way towards digital transformation and sustainable societies. Information Systems and e-Business Management 16, 479–491.Google Scholar

Park, S. E., Marshall, N. A., Jakku, E., et al. 2012. Informing adaptation responses to climate change through theories of transformation. Global Environmental Change, 22, 115–126.Google Scholar

Parkinson, J. 2003. Legitimacy problems in deliberative democracy. Political Studies, 51, 180–196.Google Scholar

Parsons, M. & Nalau, J. 2016. Historical analogies as tools in understanding transformation. Global Environmental Change, 38, 82–96.Google Scholar

Paterson, M. 2007. Automobile Politics: Ecology and Cultural Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Patterson, J., Schulz, K., Vervoort, J., et al. 2017. Exploring the governance and politics of transformations towards sustainability. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 24, 1–16.Google Scholar

Pauw, W. P., Cassanmagnano, D., Mbeva, K., et al. 2016. NDC explorer. German Development Institute, African Centre for Technology Studies, Stockholm Environment Institute. https://klimalog.die-gdi.de/ndc/#NDCExplorer/worldMap?NDC??income???catIncome (accessed 1 June 2018).Google Scholar

Pearson, P. J. & Foxon, T. J. 2012. A low carbon industrial revolution? Insights and challenges from past technological and economic transformations. Energy Policy, 50, 117–127.Google Scholar

People’s Republic of China. 2015. Vision and actions on jointly building Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st-century maritime Silk Road. National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Foreign Affairs & Ministry of Commerce. http://en.ndrc.gov.cn/newsrelease/201503/t20150330_669367.html (accessed 29 October 2017).Google Scholar

People’s Republic of China. 2016. The 13th Five-Year Plan for Economic and Social Development of the People’s Republic of China (2016–2020). Beijing: National Development and Reform Commission. http://en.ndrc.gov.cn/newsrelease/201612/P020161207645765233498.pdf (accessed 29 October 2017).Google Scholar

Pettit, P. 1993. The Common Mind: An Essay on Psychology, Society, and Politics. Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pew Research Center. 2016. March 2016 political survey. Pew Research Center. www.people-press.org/files/2016/03/03–31-2016-Political-topline-for-release.pdf (accessed 29 October 2017).Google Scholar

Philippon, D. J. 2005. Conserving Words: How American Nature Writers Shaped the Environmental Movement. Athens, GR: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar

Phillips, J. A. & Wetherell, C. 1995. The Great Reform Act of 1832 and the political modernization of England. American Historical Review, 100, 411–436.Google Scholar

Pidgeon, N. & Fischhoff, B. 2011. The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nature Climate Change, 1, 35–41.Google Scholar

Pielke, R. & Linnér, B.-O. 2019. From green revolution to green evolution: a critique of the political myth of averted famine. Minerva, 57, 1–27.Google Scholar

Pielke, R. A. 2010. The Climate Fix: What Scientists and Politicians Won’t Tell You about Global Warming. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Plummer, R. 2013. Can adaptive comanagement help to address the challenges of climate change adaptation? Ecology and Society, 18.Google Scholar

Poland. 2018. Solidarity and Just Transition: Silesia Declaration. https://cop24.gov.pl/fileadmin/user_upload/Solidarity_and_Just_Transition_Silesia_Declaration_2_.pdf (accessed 6 March 2019).Google Scholar

Polanyi, K. 1944. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. New York: Farrar & Rinehart Inc.Google Scholar

Polanyi, K. 2001. Origins of Our Time: The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Polanyi, K. & Rotstein, A. 1969. Dahomey and the Slave Trade: An Analysis of an Archaic Economy. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar

Polanyi, L. 1985. Telling the American Story: A Structural and Cultural Analysis of Conversational Storytelling. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar

Polanyi Levitt, K. 2013. From the Great Transformation to the Great Financialization. New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar

Pomeranz, K. 2000. The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Princen, T. 2010. Speaking of sustainability: the potential of metaphor. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 6, 60–65.Google Scholar

Ramos, G. 2008. Schools and sustainability. The Philippine Daily Inquirer, 15 September 2008.Google Scholar

Rao, A. & Kelleher, D. 2005. Is there life after gender mainstreaming? Gender and Development, 13, 57–69.Google Scholar

Rauschmayer, F., Bauler, T. & Schäpke, N. 2015. Towards a thick understanding of sustainability transitions – linking transition management, capabilities and social practices. Ecological Economics, 109, 211–221.Google Scholar

Reckord, M. 2013. CAPE plans for creative arts business. The Gleaner, 29 November 2013. http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20131129/ent/ent3.html (accessed 10 October 2017).Google Scholar

Reddy, M., Mohanty, M. & Naidu, V. 2004. Economic cost of human capital loss from Fiji: implications for sustainable development. The International Migration Review, 38, 1447–1461.Google Scholar

Reporters without Borders. 2018. World Press Freedom Index, 2018. Reporters without Borders. https://rsf.org/en/ranking (accessed 25 June 2018).Google Scholar

Republic of Fiji. 2014. A Green Growth Framework for Fiji: Restoring the Balance in Development That Is Sustainable for Our Future. Suva: Ministry of Strategic Planning, National Development & Statistics. https://pafpnet.spc.int/pafpnet/attachments/article/475/GREEN%20GROWTH%20FRAMEWORK.PDF (accessed 16 October 2017).Google Scholar

Republic of Fiji. 2016a. Minister Seruiratu’s statement on the international day for disaster risk reduction. Ministry of Communications. www.fiji.gov.fj/Media-Center/Press-Releases/MINISTER-SERUIRATU%E2%80%99S-STATEMENT-ON-THE-INTERNATIONA.aspx?feed=news (accessed 22 April 2017).Google Scholar

Republic of Fiji. 2016b. Hon PM Bainimarama Statement at the UN High Level Debate on the Achievement of Sustainable Development Goals. The Fijian Government Website. www.fiji.gov.fj/Media-Center/Speeches/HON-PM-BAINIMARAMA-STATEMENT-AT-THE-UN-HIGH-LEVEL-.aspx (accessed 22 April 2017).Google Scholar

Ricœur, P. 1976. Interpretation Theory. Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press.Google Scholar

Ricœur, P. 1978. The Rule of the Metaphor: Multi-Disciplinary Studies of the Creation of Meaning in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ritchie, J., Lewis, J. & Elam, G. 2003. Designing and Selecting Samples. In: Ritchie, J. & Lewis, J. (eds.) Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Ritchie, L. D. 2008. X IS A JOURNEY: embodied simulation in metaphor interpretation. Metaphor and Symbol, 23, 174–199.Google Scholar

Robinson, D. & Robinson, K. 2005. ‘Pacific Ways’ of Talk: Hui and Talanoa. Trade Consortium Working Paper 36. Wellington: New Zealand Institution of Economic Research.Google Scholar

Romaine, S. 1996. War and peace in the global greenhouse: metaphors we die by. Metaphor and Symbol Activity, 11, 175–194.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, J. 2010. Problems in the theory of uneven and combined development. Part II: uneveness and multiplicity. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 23, 165–189.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, P. 1991. The nuclear mushroom cloud as cultural image. American Literary History, 3, 63–92.Google Scholar

Ruggie, J. G. 1998. Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalisation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ryghaug, M., Holtan Sørensen, K. & Næss, R. 2011. Making sense of global warming: Norwegians appropriating knowledge of anthropogenic climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 20, 778–795.Google Scholar

Sanwal, M. 2013a. Asian giants as key partners. China Daily, 18 May 2013. www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2013-05/18/content_16508698.htm (accessed 20 June 2018).Google Scholar

Sanwal, M. 2013b. Asia must drive the post-2015 global agenda and global goals. Eco-Business, 29 July 2013. www.eco-business.com/opinion/asia-must-drive-post-2015-global-agenda-and-global-goals/ (accessed 17 November 2017).Google Scholar

Sartor, O. 2018. Implementing Coal Transitions: Insights from Case Studies of Major Coal-Consuming Economies. Paris and London: IDDRI and Climate Strategies. https://coaltransitions.files.wordpress.com/2018/09/coal_synthesis_final.pdf (accessed 10 February 2019).Google Scholar

Scattergood, G. 2013. The only way is ethics. Food Manufacture, 3 April 2014. www.foodmanufacture.co.uk/Article/2013/04/02/Fair-food-for-all (accessed 08 November 2017).Google Scholar

Schama, S. 2005. Rough Crossings: Britain, the Slaves and the American Revolution. London: BBC Books.Google Scholar

Schellnhuber, H. J., Molina, M., Stern, N., Huber, V. & Kadner, S. 2010. Global Sustainability: A Nobel Cause. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schellnhuber, H. J., Rahmstorf, S. & Winkelmann, R. 2016. Why the right climate target was agreed in Paris. Nature Climate Change, 6, 649–653.Google Scholar

Schellnhuber, H. J., Thimann, C. & Weber, A. 2016. Financing the climate-change transition. Times of Oman, 15 November 2016. https://timesofoman.com/article/96605 (accessed 16 November 2017).Google Scholar

Scheufele, D. A. & Tewksbury, D. 2007. Framing, agenda setting, and priming: the evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57, 9–20.Google Scholar

Schmidt, A., Ivanova, A. & Schäfer, M. S. 2013. Media attention for climate change around the world: a comparative analysis of newspaper coverage in 27 countries. Global Environmental Change, 23, 1233–1248.Google Scholar

Schwab, K. 2017. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar

Schwarz-Plaschg, C. 2018. Nanotechnology is like … the rhetorical roles of analogies in public engagement. Public Understanding of Science, 27, 153–167.Google Scholar

Schäfer, M. S. & Schlichting, I. 2014. Media representations of climate change: a meta-analysis of the research field. Environmental Communication, 8, 142–160.Google Scholar

Schwartz, A. 2011. It will cost $1.9 trillion annually to create a new industrial revolution. Fast Company, 6 July 2011. www.fastcompany.com/1678229/it-will-cost-19-trillion-annually-to-create-a-new-industrial-revolution (accessed 8 November 2017).Google Scholar

Science Daily, 2009. Copenhagen Climate Report: ‘inaction is inexcusable’. Science Daily, 18 June 2009. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090618085750.htm (accessed 20 June 2018).Google Scholar

Scoones, I., Leach, M. & Newell, P. (eds.) 2015. The Politics of Green Transformations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

SDG Fund. 2016. Youth in organic agriculture in Fiji. Sustainable Development Goals Fund. www.sdgfund.org/youth-organic-agriculture-fiji (accessed 29 October 2017).Google Scholar

Searle, J. 2010. Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sewell, W. H. Jr 1992. A theory of structure: duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1–29.Google Scholar

Sewell, W. H. Jr 2005. Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Sheller, M. 2000. Democracy after Slavery: Black Publics and Peasant Radicalism in Haiti and Jamaica. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Skovgaard-Petersen, J. & Asselt, H. V. 2018. The Politics of Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Their Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, N. & Joffe, H. 2013. How the public engages with global warming: a social representations approach. Public Understanding of Science, 22, 26–32.Google Scholar

Sovacool, B. & Linnér, B.-O. 2015. The Political Economy of Climate Change Adaptation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Stalley, P. 2015. China. In: Lövbrand, E. & Bäckstrand, K. (eds.) Research Handbook on Climate Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Statens Offentliga Utredningar. 2016. Ett klimatpolitiskt ramverk för Sverige: Delbetänkande av Miljömålsberedningen SOU 2016:21. Stockholm: Statens Offentliga Utredningar.Google Scholar

Steffen, W., Rockström, J., Richardson, K., et al. 2018. Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 201810141.Google Scholar

Stern, N. 2010. China’s Growth, China’s Cities, and the New Global Low-Carbon Industrial Revolution. Policy Paper. London: Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/PPStern-china-industrial-revolution-Nov.pdf (accessed 5 June 2019).Google Scholar

Stevens, C. & Kanie, N. 2016. The transformative potential of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). International Environmental Agreements, 16, 393–396.Google Scholar

Stevenson, H. 2015. Contemporary discourses of green political economy: a Q method analysis. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, DOI:10.1080/1523908X.2015.1118681.Google Scholar

Stiglitz, J. E. 2002. Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar

Stirling, A. 2014. Transforming power: social science and the politics of energy choices. Energy Research & Social Science, 1, 83–95.Google Scholar

Stirling, A. 2015. Emancipating transformations: from controlling ‘the transition’ to culturing plural radical progress. In: Scoones, I., Leach, M. & Newell, P. (eds.) The Politics of Green Transformations. London: Routledge, 54–67.Google Scholar

Sustainable Transitions Research Network. 2010. A Mission Statement and Research Agenda for the Sustainability Transitions Research Network. Amsterdam: Sustainability Transitions Research Network. www.transitionsnetwork.org/files/STRN_research_agenda_20_August_2010(2).pdf (accessed 31 May 2018).Google Scholar

Swilling, M. & Annecke, E. 2012. Just Transitions: Explorations of Sustainability in an Unfair World. Cape Town: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar

Syrquin, M. 1988. Patterns of structural change. In: Srinivasan, T. N., Chenery, H. B., Behrman, J. R., et al. (eds.) Handbook of Development Economics. New York:Elsevier, 205–273.Google Scholar

Tainter, J. 1988. The Collapse of Complex Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Teddlie, C. & Yu, F. 2007. Mixed methods sampling: a typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 77–100.Google Scholar

The Ethiopian Herald. 2015. GTP II in attaining educational goals of added quality. The Ethiopian Herald, 25 August 2015. https://allafrica.com/stories/201508251661.html (accessed 20 June 2018).Google Scholar

The Gambia. 1995. Vision 2020: The Gambia Incorporated. Banjul: AFPRC. www.africanchildinfo.net/clr/policy%20per%20country/gambia/gambia_vision_2020_en.pdf (accessed 3 May 2018).Google Scholar

The Guardian, 2015. Five questions for Keith Weed on business and the rights of children. The Guardian, 19 February 2015.Google Scholar

The Herald. 2013. Be environment stewards. The Herald, 20 March 2013. www.herald.co.zw/be-environment-stewards (accessed 7 November 2017).Google Scholar

The Shift Project. 2019. Lean ICT: Towards Digital Sobriety. Paris: The Shift Project. https://theshiftproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Lean-ICT-Report_The-Shift-Project_2019.pdf (accessed 18 March 2019).Google Scholar

The Times of India. 2013. Convergence of tech for rural empowerment a must: Kalam. The Times of India, 11 July 2013.Google Scholar

The UN Broadband Commission for Sustainable Development. 2018a. The state of broadband 2018: broadband catalyzing sustainable development. www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-s/opb/pol/S-POL-BROADBAND.19-2018-PDF-E.pdf (accessed 15 March 2019).Google Scholar

The UN Broadband Commission for Sustainable Development. 2018b. 2025 Targets: ‘Connecting the Other Half’. https://broadbandcommission.org/Documents/publications/wef2018.pdf (accessed 15 March 2019).Google Scholar

This Day. 2015. An eagle eyed view of the NBA’s annual conference. This Day, 1 September 2015. https://allafrica.com/stories/201509010046.html (accessed 20 June 2018).Google Scholar

Thompson, E. 2007. Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Tobin, Z. 2016. Former Republic of Haiti Prime Minister Laurent Lamothe to establish foundation in honor of his father, Dr. Louis G. Lamothe. Cision PR Web, 15 January 2016. www.prweb.com/releases/2016/01/prweb13166191.htm.Google Scholar

Tongur, S. & Engwall, M. 2017. Exploring window of opportunity dynamics in infrastructure transformation. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 25, 82–93.Google Scholar

Transition Network. 2016. https://transitionnetwork.org (accessed 20 June 2018).Google Scholar

Transition US. 2013. About us. Transition US. http://transitionus.org/about-us (accessed 20 June 2018).Google Scholar

Turner, M. 1990. Aspects of invariance hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 247–255.Google Scholar

Turner, V., Gantz, J. F., Reinsel, D. & Minton, S. 2014. The Digital Universe of Opportunities: Rich Data and the Increasing Value of the Internet of Things. Framingham, MA: International Data Corporation, IDC Analyze the Future, IDC_1672.Google Scholar

Turnheim, B., Berkhout, F., Geels, F., et al. 2015. Evaluating sustainability transitions pathways: bridging analytical approaches to address governance challenges. Global Environmental Change, 35, 239–253.Google Scholar

Uganda. 2010. Uganda Vision 2040. www.greengrowthknowledge.org/sites/default/files/downloads/policy-database/UGANDA%29%20Vision%202040.pdf (accessed 20 June 2018).Google Scholar

UK. 2017. Speech to the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) on the creation of test facilities for connected and autonomous vehicles. Gov.uk. www.gov.uk/government/speeches/smmt-connected-2017-conference (accessed 19 April 2017).Google Scholar

UN. 2012. Resolution by the General Assembly on 27 July 2012 – The Future We Want. New York: United Nations, A/RES/66/288.Google Scholar

UN. 2013a. A New Global Partnership: Eradicate Poverty and Transform Economies through Sustainable Development: The Report of the High-Level Panel of Eminent Persons on the Post-2015 Development Agenda, New York: United Nations.Google Scholar

UN. 2013b. United Nations General Assembly Sixty-Eighth Session. Item 118 of the Provisional Agenda. Follow-Up to the Outcome of the Millennium Summit. A Life of Dignity for All: Accelerating Progress towards the Millennium Development Goals and Advancing the United Nations Development Agenda beyond 2015. Report of the Secretary-General. New York:United Nations, A/68/202.Google Scholar

UN. 2016a. Switzerland’s initial steps towards the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/10617Full%20Report%20HLPF%202016_Switzerland_EN%20fin.pdf (accessed 20 December 2017).Google Scholar

UN. 2016b. Year one of implementing the SDGs in the Republic of Korea: from a model of development success to a vision for sustainable development. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/10632National%20Voluntary%20Review%20Report%20(rev_final).pdf (accessed 20 December 2017).Google Scholar

UN. 2016c. Report of the German Federal Government to the High-Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development 2016. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/10686HLPF-Bericht_final_EN.pdf (accessed 20 December 2016).Google Scholar

UN. 2016d. National report on the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development of Finland. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/10611Finland_VNR.pdf (accessed 20 December 2016).Google Scholar

UN. 2017a. Voluntary National Review of Italy – national sustainable development strategy. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform,https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/16341Italy.pdf (accessed 21 December 2017).Google Scholar

UN. 2017b. Voluntary National Review of Brazil. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/15806Brazil_English.pdf (accessed 21 December 2017).Google Scholar

UN. 2017c. Report for the Voluntary National Review: Denmark’s implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). United Nations. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/vnrs/ (accessed 4 June 2018).Google Scholar

UN. 2017d. Voluntary National Review on the implementation of the 2030 Agenda report to the UN High Level Political Forum 2017 on sustainable development of Slovenia. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/16313Slovenia.pdf (accessed 21 December 2017).Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. New York: United Nations, A/RES/70/1.Google Scholar

UN Secretary General. 2015. Secretary-General's remarks at Summit for the Adoption of the Post-2015 Development Agenda. https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/statement/2015-09-25/secretary-generals-remarks-summit-adoption-post-2015-development(accessed 4 June 2019).Google Scholar

UNDP. 2018. Human Development Indices and Indicators. 2018 Statistical Update. New York: United Nations Development Programme. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2018_human_development_statistical_update.pdf (accessed 6 June 2019).Google Scholar

UNESCAP. 2015. Countries with Special Needs. Fiji Update MDG-SDG. Bangkok: UNESCAP.Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015a. Intended Nationally Determined Contribution (INDC) of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. UNFCCC INDC portal, www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Ethiopia/1/INDC-Ethiopia-100615.pdf (accessed 3 December 2015).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015b. Intended Nationally Determined Contribution of the Gambia. UNFCCC INDC portal, www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Gambia/1/The%20INDC%20OF%20THE%20GAMBIA.pdf (accessed 3 December 2015).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015c. Intended Nationally Determined Contribution of Costa Rica. UNFCCC INDC portal, www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Costa%20Rica/1/INDC%20Costa%20Rica%20Version%202%200%20final%20ENG.pdf (accessed 3 December 2015).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015d. Intended Nationally Determined Contribution of Turkmenistan in accordance with decision 1/CP.20. UNFCCC INDC portal, www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Turkmenistan/1/INDC_Turkmenistan.pdf (accessed 7 June 2019).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015e. Intended Nationally Determined Contribution of the plurinational State of Bolivia. UNFCCC INDC portal, www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Bolivia/1/INDC-Bolivia-english.pdf (accessed 6 November 2015).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015f. Intended Nationally Determined Contribution of the Federated States of Micronesia. UNFCCC INDC portal, www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Micronesia/1/INDC%20Federated%20States%20of%20MICRONESIA.pdf (accessed 3 December 2015).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015g. Intended Nationally Determined Contribution of Uganda. UNFCCC INDC portal, www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Uganda/1/INDC%20Uganda%20final%20%2014%20October%20%202015,%20minor%20correction,28.10.15.pdf (accessed 3 December 2015).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015h. Intended National Determined Contribution of the Republic of Moldova. UNFCCC INDC portal, www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Republic%20of%20Moldova/1/INDC_Republic_of_Moldova_25.09.2015.pdf (accessed 7 June 2019).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015i. Intended Nationally Determined Contribution of the United Arab Emirates. UNFCCC INDC website, www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/United%20Arab%20Emirates/1/UAE%20INDC%20-%2022%20October.pdf (accessed 7 June 2019).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015j. Intended Nationally Determined Contribution of Togo. UNFCCC INDC portal, www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Togo/1/INDC%20Togo_english%20version.pdf (accessed 3 December 2015).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015k. Intended Nationally Determined Contribution of Nigeria. UNFCCC INDC portal, www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Nigeria/1/Approved%20Nigeria’s%20INDC_271115.pdf (accessed 3 December 2015).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015l. Intended Nationally Determined Contribution of the Dominican Republic. UNFCCC INDC portal, www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Dominican%20Republic/1/INDC-DR%20August%202015%20(unofficial%20translation).pdf (accessed 3 December 2015).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015m. Intended Nationally Determined Contribution of Liberia. UNFCCC INDC portal, www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Liberia/1/INDC%20Final%20Submission%20Sept%2030%202015.002.pdf (accessed 3 December 2015).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015n. Intended Nationally Determined Contribution of Egypt. UNFCCC INDC portal, www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Egypt/1/Egyptian%20INDC.pdf (accessed 7 June 2019).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015o. Intended Nationally Determined Contribution of Burkina Faso. UNFCCC INDC portal, www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Burkina%20Faso/1/INDC%20Burkina_ENG.%20version_finale.pdf (accessed 7 June 2019).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015p. Intended National Determined Contribution of Burundi. UNFCCC INDC portal, www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Burundi/1/Burundi_INDC-english%20version.pdf (accessed 7 June 2019).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015q. Intended Nationally Determined Contribution of the Cook Islands. UNFCCC INDC portal, www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Cook%20Islands/1/Cook%20Islands%20INDCsFINAL7Nov.pdf (accessed 7 June 2019).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015r. Intended Nationally Determined Contributions of Somalia. UNFCCC INDC portal, www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Somalia/1/Somalia’s%20INDCs.pdf (accessed 3 December 2015).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015s. Intended Nationally Determined Contribution of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. UNFCCC INDC portal, www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Jordan/1/Jordan%20INDCs%20Final.pdf (accessed 3 December 2015).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015t. Nationally Determined Contribution of Morocco. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform, www4.unfccc.int/sites/ndcstaging/PublishedDocuments/Morocco%20First/Morocco%20First%20NDC-English.pdf (accessed 20 December 2015).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015u. Revised Intended Nationally Determined Contribution of Guyana. UNFCCC INDC portal, www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Guyana/1/Guyana’s%20revised%20iNDC%20-%20Final.pdf (accessed 3 December 2015).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015v. Intended Nationally Determined Contribution of Belize. UNFCCC INDC portal, www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Belize/1/Belize%20INDCS.pdf (accessed 7 June 2019).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015w. Intended Nationally Determined Contribution of Pakistan. UNFCCC INDC website, www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Pakistan/1/Pak-INDC.pdf (accessed 7 June 2019).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015x. Intended Nationally Determined Contribution of Papua New Guinea. UNFCCC INDC portal, www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Papua%20New%20Guinea/1/PNG_INDC%20to%20the%20UNFCCC.pdf (accessed 3 December 2015).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015y. Intended Nationally Determined Contribution of the Commonwealth of Dominica. UNFCCC INDC portal, www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Dominica/1/Commonwealth%20of%20Dominica-%20Intended%20Nationally%20Determined%20Contributions%20(INDC).pdf (accessed 7 June 2019).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015z. Nationally Determined Contribution of New Zealand. UNFCCC INDC portal, www4.unfccc.int/sites/ndcstaging/PublishedDocuments/New%20Zealand%20First/New%20Zealand%20first%20NDC.pdf (accessed 3 December 2015).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015aa. Intended Nationally Determined Contribution of Cabo Verde. UNFCCC INDC portal, www4.unfccc.int/sites/ndcstaging/PublishedDocuments/Cabo%20Verde%20First/Cabo_Verde_INDC_.pdf (accessed 20 December 2015).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015ab. Intended Nationally Determined Contributions of China. UNFCCC INDC portal, www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/China/1/China’s%20INDC%20-%20on%2030%20June%202015.pdf (accessed 3 December 2015).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015ac. ‘The eyes of the world are on Paris’ – COP21 opening ceremony. https://unfccc.int/news/the-eyes-of-the-world-are-on-paris-cop21-opening-ceremony (accessed 20 June 2018).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015ad. Intended Nationally Determined Contributions of Zimbabwe. UNFCCC INDC portal, www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Zimbabwe/1/Zimbabwe%20Intended%20Nationally%20Determined%20Contribution%202015.pdf (accessed 3 December 2015).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015ae. Intended Nationally Determined Contributions of Georgia. UNFCCC INDC portal, www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Georgia/1/INDC_of_Georgia.pdf (accessed 7 June 2019).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015af. Intended Nationally Determined Contributions of Lesotho. UNFCCC INDC portal, www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Lesotho/1/Lesotho’s%20INDC%20Report%20%20-%20September%202015.pdf (accessed 3 December 2015).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015ag. Intended Nationally Determined Contributions of Mexico. UNFCCC INDC portal, www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Mexico/1/MEXICO%20INDC%2003.30.2015.pdf (accessed 3 December 2015).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2015ah. Intended Nationally Determined Contribution of India: working towards climate justice. UNFCCC INDC portal, www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/India/1/INDIA%20INDC%20TO%20UNFCCC.pdf (accessed 3 December 2015).Google Scholar

UNFCCC. 2018. Talanoa dialogue for climate ambition. UNFCCC. https://talanoadialogue.com (accessed 12 June 2018).Google Scholar

UNOOSA. 2013. Rio+20 and beyond: note by the Secretariat Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space. Fifty-sixth session 2013. Space and sustainable development. Vienna: United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs, A/AC.105/2013/CRP.7.Google Scholar

Urry, J. 2004. The ‘system’of automobility. Theory, Culture & Society, 21, 25–39.Google Scholar

US Census Bureau. 2017. QuickFacts, 2016. United States Department of Commerce. www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045216 (accessed 29 October 2017).Google Scholar

Van Der Hel, S. 2016. New science for global sustainability? The institutionalisation of knowledge co-production in Future Earth. Environmental Science & Policy, 61, 165–175.Google Scholar

van Eeten, M. 2007. Narrative policy analysis. In: Fischer, F., Miller, G. & Sidney, M. S. (eds.) Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar

Verweij, M., Douglas, M., Ellis, R., et al. 2006. Clumsy solutions for a complex world: the case of climate change. Public Administration, 84, 817–843.Google Scholar

Vloet, K. 2009. Career learning and teachers’ professional identity: narratives in dialogue. In: Kuijpers, M. & Meijers, F. (eds.) Career Learning, Research and Practice in Education. Hertogenbosch, NL: Euroguidance.Google Scholar

Vondung, K. 1988. Die Apokalypse in Deutschland. Munich: DTV.Google Scholar

Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R. & Kinzig, A. 2004. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9, 5.Google Scholar

Walters, H. 2007. Capacity development, institutional change and theory of change: what do we mean and where are the linkages. A conceptual background paper. ‘Scrutinizing Success and Failure in Development’, Wageningen University, the Netherlands.Google Scholar

Wang, X., Peszko, G., Brandon, C. J., et al. 2016. Pursuing an Innovative Development Pathway: Understanding China’s NDC. Country paper. Washington, DC: The World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/312771480392483509/Pursuing-an-innovative-development-pathway-understanding-China-s-NDC (accessed 29 October 2017).Google Scholar

WBGU. 2011. World in Transition: A Social Contract for Sustainability. Flagship Report. Berlin: German Advisory Council on Global Change.Google Scholar

Weart, S. R. 1988. Nuclear Fear: A History of Images. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Weber, K. & Glynn, M. A. 2006. Making sense with institutions: context, thought and action in Karl Weick’s theory. Organization Studies, 27, 1639–1660.Google Scholar

Wee, L. 2005. Constructing the source: metaphor as a discourse strategy. Discourse Studies, 7, 363–384.Google Scholar

WEF. 2019. Mapping Global Transformations. https://toplink.weforum.org/knowledge/explore (accessed 25 February 2015).Google Scholar

Weick, K. E. 1984. Small wins: redefining the scale of social problems. American Psychologist, 39, 40–49.Google Scholar

Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M. & Obstfeld, D. 2005. Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16, 409–421.Google Scholar

Wells, C. W. 2012. Car Country: An Environmental History. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar

Wendt, A. 2015. Quantum Mind and Social Science: Unifying Physical and Social Ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Westley, F., Olsson, P., Folke, C., et al. 2011. Tipping toward sustainability: emerging pathways of transformation. Ambio, 40, 762–780.Google Scholar

Westley, F., Mcgowan, K. & Tjörnbo, O. 2017. The Evolution of Social Innovation: Building Resilience through Transitions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Wibeck, V. 2012. Images of environmental management: competing metaphors in focus group discussions of Swedish environmental quality objectives. Environmental Management, 49, 776–787.Google Scholar

Wibeck, V. 2014a. Enhancing learning, communication and public engagement about climate change – some lessons from recent literature. Environmental Education Research, 20, 387–411.Google Scholar

Wibeck, V. 2014b. Social representations of climate change in Swedish lay focus groups: local or distant, gradual or catastrophic? Public Understanding of Science, 23, 204–219.Google Scholar

Wibeck, V., Abrandt-Dahlgren, M. & Öberg, G. 2007. Learning in focus groups: an analytical dimension for enhancing focus group research. Qualitative Research, 7, 249–267.Google Scholar

Wibeck, V., Hansson, A. & Anshelm, J. 2015. Questioning the technological fix to climate change – lay sense-making of geoengineering in Sweden. Energy Research & Social Science, 7, 23–30.Google Scholar

Wibeck, V., Hansson, A., Anshelm, J., et al. 2017. Making sense of climate engineering: a focus group study of lay publics in four countries. Climatic Change, 145, 1–14.Google Scholar

Wibeck, V. & Linnér, B.-O. 2012. Public understanding of uncertainties in climate science and policy. In: Ibisch, P. L., Geiger, L. & Cybulla, F. (eds.) Global Change Management: Knowledge Gaps, Blindspots and Unknowables. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Wibeck, V., Linnér, B.-O., Alves, M., et al. 2019. Stories of transformation: a cross-country focus group study on sustainable development and societal change. Sustainability, 11, 2427.Google Scholar

Woolsey, M. 2009. In depth: America’s Top 25 Towns to Live Well. Forbes, 4 May 2009. www.forbes.com/2009/05/04/towns-cities-real-estate-lifestyle-real-estate-top-towns_slide.html (accessed 20 June 2018).Google Scholar

Wootton, D. 2015. The Invention of Science: A New History of the Scientific Revolution. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

World Bank. 2015. East Asia’s Changing Urban Landscape: Measuring a Decade of Spatial Growth. Urban Development Series. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

World Bank. 2019a. Cabo Verde overview. World Bank Group. www.worldbank.org/en/country/caboverde/overview (accessed 25 June 2018).Google Scholar

World Bank. 2019b. World Bank data: GDP per capita, 2017. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/ny.gdp.pcap.cd (accessed 20 March 2019).Google Scholar

World Bank. 2019c. China overview. World Bank Group. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/china (accessed 22 June 2019).Google Scholar

World Values Survey. 2016. Values Change the World. www.iffs.se/media/1931/wvs-brochure-web.pdf (accessed 20 June 2018).Google Scholar

Worster, D. 2016. Shrinking the Earth: The Rise and Decline of American Abundance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wright, E. O. 2013. Transforming capitalism through real utopias. American Sociological Review, 78, 1–25.Google Scholar

Wrigley, E. A. 1988. Continuity, Chance and Change: The Character of the Industrial Revolution in England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wyatt, S. 2004. Danger! Metaphors at work in economics, geophysiology, and the Internet. Science, Technology and Human Values, 29, 242–261.Google Scholar

van Wyk, C. 2016. #MobilityIndaba: rethinking mobility for Cape Town’s sake. Biz Community, 29 August 2016. www.bizcommunity.com/Article/196/709/151977.html (accessed 10 October 2017).Google Scholar

Xinhua News Agency. 2011. UN report urges for new industrial revolution to avert ‘planetary catastrophe’. Xinhua News Agency, 6 July 2011.Google Scholar

Xinhua News Agency. 2012. UNEP says Rio +20 outcomes to shape a sustainable future. Xinhua News Agency, 27 June 2012.Google Scholar

Xue, D., Huang, G., Guan, J. & Lin, J. 2014. Changing concepts of city and urban planning practices in Guangzhou (1949–2010): an approach to sustainable urban development. Chinese Geographical Science, 24, 607–619.Google Scholar

Ye, M. 2015. China and competing cooperation in Asia-Pacific: TPP, RCEP, and the new Silk Road. Asian Security, 11, 206–224.Google Scholar

Young, O. R. 2017. Beyond regulation: innovative strategies for governing large complex systems. Sustainability, 9, 938.Google Scholar

Zayed, D. 2016. For Egypt’s entrepreneurs, going green makes business sense. Thomas Reuters Foundation, 15 June 2016. www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-egypt-business-climatechange-idUSKCN0Z11T4 (accessed 5 August 2017).Google Scholar

Zia, A. & Todd, A. M. 2010. Evaluating the effects of ideology on public understanding of climate change science: how to improve communication across ideological divides? Public Understanding of Science, 19, 743–761.Google Scholar

Zinken, J. 2003. Ideological imagination: intertextual and correlational metaphors in political discourse. Discourse & Society, 14, 507–523.Google Scholar