Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T21:14:08.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction - The Trouble with Law Schools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Robin L. West
Affiliation:
Georgetown University Law Center
Get access

Summary

The Economic Crisis

The American legal academy is in a world of trouble. Some reasons for that are now familiar, both in and outside law schools. Most important, law graduates in large numbers are not finding legal jobs. Law firm work is being outsourced, being scaled back, or being done by non–partnership-track contract attorneys working for much less than traditional associates, or simply not being done at all. As a result, out-of-work or never-employed law graduates, many of them carrying between $100,000 and $200,000 worth of student debt, are now as ubiquitous in the bartending and cab-driving professions as the proverbial humanities majors. A number of credible studies show that sizable percentages of the still-growing numbers of the Great Recession–era graduates of law schools will never find legal work. Equally responsible forecasts suggest that even in a fully recovered economy, the legal profession will be radically restructured, with far fewer jobs in major firms serving large corporate clients – the slice of the profession disproportionately responsible for attracting college graduates to law schools in the first place.

The second source of trouble, also a familiar one by now, is entirely of the law schools’ own making. In a fit of short-term thinking that blotted out long-term consequences, many law schools, using the thinnest of rationales, continued to report to the American Bar Association (ABA) during the first few years of the recession – and hence during a time of plummeting legal employment – that their own recent graduates were still finding jobs at astonishingly high rates – in the mid-ninetieth percentile or higher. The ABA in turn reported these statistics to the US News and World Report (USNWR), the law schools’ equivalent of a rating agency. Those rates were then published in the USNWR’s annual “rankings” guide of law schools, on which college seniors rely when making the decision on whether and where to go to law school.

Type
Chapter
Information
Teaching Law
Justice, Politics, and the Demands of Professionalism
, pp. 1 - 42
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Edwards, Harry T., “The Growing Disjunction between Legal Education and the Legal Profession.” Michigan Law Review 91 (1992), 34–78Google Scholar
Dolin, Jason M., “Opportunity Lost: How Law School Disappoints Law Students, the Public, and the Legal Profession,” California Western Law Review 44 (2008), 219–256Google Scholar
Segal, David, “What They Don’t Teach Law Students: Lawyering.” N.Y. Times (November 19, 2011)
Posner, Richard A., “The Deprofessionalization of Legal Teaching and Scholarship,” Michigan Law Review 91(8) (1993), 1921–1928Google Scholar
Rhode, Deborah L., “Legal Scholarship,” Harvard Law Review 115(5) (2002), 1327–1361.Google Scholar
Farber, Daniel, “The Case against Brilliance,” Minnesota Law Review 70(4) (1985), 917–930Google Scholar
Morriss, Andrew P. and Henderson, William D., “Legal Education: Lawyers and Law School Reform.” Illinois Bar Journal 100(8) (2012), 414Google Scholar
Frank, Jerome, “Why Not a Clinical-Lawyer School?,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 81 (1933)Google Scholar
McDougal, Myers, “The Law School of the Future: From Legal Realism to Policy Science in the World Community,” Yale Law Journal 56 (1946), 1345Google Scholar
Frank, Jerome, Law and The Modern Mind (1930)
Cohen, Felix, “Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach,” Columbia Law Review 35 (1935)Google Scholar
Holmes, Oliver W., “The Path of the Law,” Harvard Law Review 10 (1897), 467Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick, The Theory of Rules (2011)
Grey, Thomas C., “Langdell’s Orthodoxy,” University of Pittsburgh Law Review 45 (1983)Google Scholar
Kronman, Anthony T., “The Problem of Judicial Discretion,” Journal of Legal Education 36 (1986)Google Scholar
Ferguson, Robert, Law and Letters in American Culture (1984), 7–8, 199–206

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×