Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Foreword by George Gerbner
- 1 Origins
- 2 Methods of Cultivation: Assumptions and Rationale
- 3 Methods of Cultivation and Early Empirical Work
- 4 Criticisms
- 5 Advancements in Cultivation Research
- 6 The Bigger Picture
- 7 Mediation, Mainstreaming and Social Change
- 8 How does Cultivation “Work,” Anyway?
- 9 Cultivation and the New Media
- 10 Test Pattern
- Methodological Appendix
- References
- Index
9 - Cultivation and the New Media
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Foreword by George Gerbner
- 1 Origins
- 2 Methods of Cultivation: Assumptions and Rationale
- 3 Methods of Cultivation and Early Empirical Work
- 4 Criticisms
- 5 Advancements in Cultivation Research
- 6 The Bigger Picture
- 7 Mediation, Mainstreaming and Social Change
- 8 How does Cultivation “Work,” Anyway?
- 9 Cultivation and the New Media
- 10 Test Pattern
- Methodological Appendix
- References
- Index
Summary
Discussing the advent of something he calls the “teleputer” (a television-computer hybrid), Gilder (1994) says:
Rather than exalting mass culture, the teleputer will enhance individualism. Rather than cultivating passivity, the teleputer will promote creativity. Instead of a master-slave architecture, the teleputer will have an interactive architecture in which every receiver can function as a processor and transmitter of video images and other information. The teleputer will usher in a culture compatible with the immense powers of today's ascendant technology. Perhaps most important, the teleputer will enrich and strengthen democracy and capitalism around the world.
(p. 46)Gilder's pronouncements are characteristic of much media soothsaying today, which looks forward to a new media age in which television's despotism has been vanquished. As Gilder says, “Television is a tool of tyrants. Its overthrow will be a major force for freedom and individuality, culture, and morality. That overthrow is at hand” (p. 49).
Gilder is not alone. Seers of the media future such as Nicholas Negroponte, speaking of video-on-demand (VOD) technologies, say
My point is simple: the broadcast model is what is failing. ‘On-demand’ is a much bigger concept than not-walking-out-in-the-rain or not-forgetting-a-rented-cassette-under-the-sofa-for-a-month. It's consumer pull versus media push, my time – the receiver's time – versus the transmitter's time. Beyond recalling an existing movie or playing any of today's (or yesterday's) TV around the world (roughly 15,000 concurrent channels), VOD could provide a new life for documentary films, even the dreaded ‘infomercial.’ The hairs of documentary filmmakers will stand on end when they hear this. But it is possible to have TV agents edit movies on the fly, much like a professor assembling an anthology using chapters from different books.
(Negroponte, 1994)- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Television and its ViewersCultivation Theory and Research, pp. 198 - 219Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1999