Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T19:26:02.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 16 - Genetics and Reproduction

from Section 3 - Genetics and Preimplantation Genetic Testing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2021

Edited by
Eliezer Girsh
Eliezer Girsh
Affiliation:
Barzilai Medical Center, Ashkelon
Get access

Summary

Our genetic information, sometimes described as the “Book of Life,” can be envisaged as a compilation containing two “sets” of information, with one originated from the female and the other from the male. Each set includes 23 “volumes” (chromosomes), and each of these chromosomes contains many “chapters and pages” (clusters of genes). Each gene encodes for a specific message to the cell cytoplasm, where ribosomes translate the codes to specific proteins. The genetic code is made up of combinations of three out of four possible essential nucleotides (A, T, G, and C). These nucleotides are the chemical molecules, components of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), creating the genetic information that can be further transcripted and translated by different cell types of machinery to produce the essential cellular proteins. A trinucleotide code (three basic nucleotides), called a codon, encodes a specific amino acid, a basic brick of protein structure.

Type
Chapter
Information
A Textbook of Clinical Embryology , pp. 194 - 206
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mau-Holzmann, UA. Somatic chromosomal abnormalities in infertile men and women. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2005; 111:317–336.Google Scholar
Therman, E, Susman, B, Denniston, C. The nonrandom participation of human acrocentric chromosomes in Robertsonian translocations. Ann. Hum. Genet. 1989; 53:49–65.Google Scholar
Kuroda-Kawaguchi, T, Skaletsky, H, Brown, LG, et al. The AZFc region of the Y chromosome features massive palindromes and uniform recurrent deletions in infertile men. Nat. Genet. 2001; 29:279–286.Google Scholar
Sasagawa, I, Ishigooka, M, Kubota, Y, et al. Pericentric inversion of chromosome 9 in infertile men. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 1998; 30:203–207.Google Scholar
Royo, H, Polikiewicz, G, Mahadevaiah, SK, et al. Evidence that meiotic sex chromosome inactivation is essential for male fertility. Curr. Biol. 2010; 20:2117–2123.Google Scholar
Homolka, D, Jansa, P, Forejt, J. Genetically enhanced asynapsis of autosomal chromatin promotes transcriptional dysregulation and meiotic failure. Chromosoma 2011; 121:91–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neto, FTL, Bach, PV, Najari, BB, Li, PS, Goldstein, M. Genetics of male infertility. Curr. Urol. Rep. 2016;17:70–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-016–0627-x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lissitsina, J, Mikelsaar, R, Punab, M. Cytogenetic analyses in infertile men. Arch. Androl. 2006; 52:91–95.Google Scholar
Balkan, M, Tekes, S, Gedik, A. Cytogenetic and Y chromosome microdeletion screening studies in infertile males with oligozoospermia and azoospermia in Southeast Turkey. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2008; 25:559–565.Google Scholar
Rives, N, Joly, G, Machy, A, et al. Assessment of sex chromosome aneuploidy in sperm nuclei from 47,XXY and 46,XY/47,XXY males: comparison with fertile and infertile males with normal karyotype. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2000; 6:107–112.Google Scholar
Mallepaly, R, Butler, PR, Herati, AS, Lamb, DJ. Genetic basis of male and female infertility. Monogr. Hum. Genet. 2017; 21:1–16.Google Scholar
Grynberg, M, Bidet, M, Benard, J, et al. Fertility preservation in Turner syndrome. Fertil. Steril. 2016; 105:13–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, H-L, Lv, C, Zhao, Y-C, et al. Mutant ZP1 in familial infertility. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014; 370:1220–1226.Google Scholar
Hassold, T, Hunt, P. To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2001; 2:280–291.Google Scholar
Henderson, SA, Edwards, RG. Chiasma frequency and maternal age in mammals. Nature 1968; 218:22–28.Google Scholar
Angell, RR. Predivision in human oocytes at meiosis I: a mechanism for trisomy formation in man. Hum. Genet. 1991; 86:383–387.Google Scholar
Angell, RR, Xian, J, Keith, J, Ledger, W, Baird, DT. First meiotic division abnormalities in human oocytes: mechanism of trisomy formation. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 1994; 65:194–202.Google Scholar
Pellestor, F, Andreo, B, Arnal, F, Humeau, C, Demaille, J. Maternal aging and chromosomal abnormalities: new data drawn from in vitro unfertilized human oocytes. Hum. Genet. 2003; 112:195–203.Google Scholar
Revenkova, E, Herrmann, K, Adelfalk, C, Jessberger, R. Oocyte cohesin expression restricted to predict stages provides full fertility and prevents aneuploidy. Curr. Biol. 2010; 20:1529–1533.Google Scholar
Reis, A, Madgwick, S, Chang, HY, et al. Prometaphase APC cdh1 activity prevents non-disjunction in mammalian oocytes. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007; 9:1192–1198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lim, AS, Fong, Y, Yu, SL. Estimates of sperm sex chromosome disomy and diploidy rates in a 47,XXY/46,XY mosaic Klinefelter patient. Hum. Genet. 1999; 104:405–409.Google Scholar
Thomas, NS, Hassold, TJ. Aberrant recombination and the origin of Klinefelter syndrome. Hum. Reprod. Update 2003; 9:309–317.Google Scholar
Lenz, P, Luetjens, CM, Kamischke, A, et al. Mosaic status in lymphocytes of infertile men with or without Klinefelter syndrome. Hum. Reprod. 2005; 20:1248–1255.Google Scholar
Schiff, JD, Palermo, GD, Veeck, LL, et al. Success of testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in men with Klinefelter syndrome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005; 90:6263–6267.Google Scholar
Aksglaede, L. Natural history of seminiferous tubule degeneration in Klinefelter syndrome. Hum. Reprod. Update 2005; 12:39–48.Google Scholar
Ichioka, K, Utsunomiya, N, Kohei, N, et al. Adult onset of declining spermatogenesis in a man with nonmosaic Klinefelter’s syndrome. Fertil. Steril. 2006; 85:1511.e1–1511.e2.Google Scholar
Plotton, I, Giscard d’Estaing, S, Cuzin, B, et al. Preliminary results of a prospective study of testicular sperm extraction in young versus adult patients with nonmosaic 47,XXY Klinefelter syndrome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015; 100:961–967.Google Scholar
Van Saen, D, Vloeberghs, V, Gies, I, et al. When does germ cell loss and fibrosis occur in patients with Klinefelter syndrome? Hum. Reprod. 2018; 33:1009–1022.Google Scholar
Van Saen, D, Pino Sánchez, J, Ferster, A, et al. Is the protein expression window during testicular development affected in patients at risk for stem cell loss? Hum. Reprod. 2015; 30:2859–2870.Google Scholar
Corona, G, Pizzocaro, A, Lanfranco, F, et al. Sperm recovery and ICSI outcomes in Klinefelter syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. Update 2017; 23:265–275.Google Scholar
Ron-El, R, Raziel, A, Strassburger, D, et al. Birth of healthy male twins after intracytoplasmic sperm injection of frozen-thawed testicular spermatozoa from a patient with nonmosaic Klinefelter syndrome. Fertil. Steril. 2000; 74:832–833.Google Scholar
Friedler, S, Raziel, A, Strassburger, D, et al. Outcome of ICSI using fresh and cryopreserved-thawed testicular spermatozoa in patients with non-mosaic Klinefelter’s syndrome. Hum. Reprod. 2001; 16:2616–2620.Google Scholar
Estop, AM, Munne, S, Cieply, KM, et al. Meiotic products of a Klinefelter 47,XXY male as determined by sperm fluorescence in-situ hybridization analysis. Hum. Reprod. 1998; 13:124–127.Google Scholar
Maduro, MR, Lamb, DJ. Understanding new genetics of male infertility. J. Urol. 2002; 168:2197–2205.Google Scholar
Quinn, A, Koopman, P. The molecular genetics of sex determination and sex reversal in mammals. Semin. Reprod. Med. 2012; 30:351–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oates, RD. The genetic basis of male reproductive failure. Urol. Clin. North Am. 2008; 35:257–270, ix.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, JL, Kurek, JA, Morgan, JC, Sethi, KD. Tremor and dystonia in Jacob’s syndrome (47,XYY). Mov. Disord. Clin. Pract. 2019; 7:107–108.Google Scholar
Otter, M, Schrander-Stumpel, CT, Curfs, LM. Triple X syndrome: a review of the literature. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2010; 18:265–271.Google Scholar
Kosteria, I, Kanaka-Gantenbein, C. Turner syndrome: transition from childhood to adolescence. Metabolism 2018; 86:145–153.Google Scholar
Chandley, AC, Seuanez, H, Fletcher, JM. Meiotic behavior of five human reciprocal translocations. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 1976; 17:98–111.Google Scholar
Elliott, DJ, Cooke, HJ. The molecular genetics of male infertility. Bioessays 1997; 19:801–809.Google Scholar
Estop, AM, Van Kirk, V, Cieply, K. Segregation analysis of four translocations, t(2;18), t(3;15), t(5;7), and t(10;12), by sperm chromosome studies and a review of the literature. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 1995; 70:80–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cifuentes, P, Navarro, J, Blanco, J, et al. Cytogenetic analysis of sperm chromosomes and sperm nuclei in a male heterozygous for a reciprocal translocation t(5;7)(q21;q32) by in situ hybridisation. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 1999; 7:231–238.Google Scholar
Alves, C, Carvalho, F, Cremades, N, Sousa, M, Barros, A. Unique (Y;13) translocation in a male with oligozoospermia: cytogenetic and molecular studies. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2002; 10:467–474.Google Scholar
Ferguson, KA, Chow, V, Ma, S. Silencing of unpaired meiotic chromosomes and altered recombination patterns in an azoospermic carrier of a t(8;13) reciprocal translocation. Hum. Reprod. 2008; 23:988–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, JH, Zhu, PY, Huang, YF, Yu, L. Autosomal aberrations associated with testicular dysgenesis or spermatogenic arrest in Chinese patients. Asian J. Androl. 2002; 4:3–7.Google Scholar
Gunel, M, Cavkaytar, S, Ceylaner, G, Batioglu, S. Azoospermia and cryptorchidism in a male with a de novo reciprocal t(Y;16) translocation. Genet. Couns. 2008; 19:277–280.Google Scholar
Pabst, B, Glaubitz, R, Schalk, T, et al. Reciprocal translocation between Y chromosome long arm euchromatin and the short arm of chromosome 1. Ann. Genet. 2002; 45:5–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mohandas, TK, Speed, RM, Passage, MB, et al. Role of the pseudo-autosomal region in sex chromosome pairing during male meiosis: meiotic studies in a man with a deletion of distal Xp. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1992; 51:526–533.Google Scholar
Ellison, JW, Wardak, Z, Young, MF, et al. PHOG, a candidate gene for involvement in the short stature of Turner syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1997; 6:1341–1347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rao, E, Weiss, B, Fukami, M, et al. Pseudoautosomal deletions encompassing a novel homeobox gene cause growth failure in idiopathic short stature and Turner syndrome. Nat. Genet. 1997; 16:54–63.Google Scholar
Poongothai, J, Gopenath, TS, Manonayaki, S. Genetics of human male infertility. Singapore Med. J. 2009; 50:336–347.Google Scholar
Kamp, C, Huellen, K, Fernandes, S, et al. High deletion frequency of the complete AZFa sequence in men with Sertoli-cell-only syndrome. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2001; 7:987–994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krausz, C, Forti, G, McElreavey, K. The Y chromosome and male fertility and infertility. Int. J. Androl. 2003; 26:70–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dada, R, Gupta, NP, Kucheria, K. Yq microdeletions--azoospermia factor candidate genes and spermatogenic arrest. J. Biomol. Tech. 2004; 15:176–183.Google ScholarPubMed
Walsh, TJ, Pera, RR, Turek, PJ. The genetics of male infertility. Semin. Reprod. Med. 2009; 27:124–136.Google Scholar
Krausz, C, Quintana-Murci, L, McElreavey, K. Prognostic value of Y deletion analysis: what is the clinical prognostic value of Y chromosome microdeletion analysis? Hum. Reprod. 2000; 15:1431–1434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lekovich, J, Man, L, Xu, K, et al. CGG repeat length and AGG interruptions as indicators of fragile X-associated diminished ovarian reserve. Genet. Med. 2017; 20:957–964.Google Scholar
Karimov, CB, Moragianni, VA, Cronister, A, et al. Increased frequency of occult fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency in infertile women with evidence of impaired ovarian function. Hum. Reprod. 2011; 26:2077–2083.Google Scholar
Crawford, DC, Acuña, JM, Sherman, SL. FMR1 and the fragile X syndrome: human genome epidemiology review. Genet. Med. 2001; 3:359–371.Google Scholar
Elizur, SE, Lebovitz, O, Derech-Haim, S, et al. Elevated levels of FMR1 mRNA in granulosa cells are associated with low ovarian reserve in FMR1 premutation carriers. PLoS One 2014; 9:e105121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gustin, SE, Hogg, K, Stringer, JM, et al. WNT/β-catenin and p27/FOXL2 differentially regulate supporting cell proliferation in the developing ovary. Dev. Biol. 2016; 412:250–260.Google Scholar
Carrell, DT, De Jonge, C, Lamb, DJ. The genetics of male infertility: a field of study whose time is now. Arch. Androl. 2006; 52: 269–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radpour, R, Gourabi, H, Gilani, MA, Dizaj, AV. Molecular study of (TG)m(T)n polymorphisms in Iranian males with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens. J. Androl. 2007; 28:541–547.Google Scholar
Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine in collaboration with Society for Male Reproduction and Urology. Evaluation of the azoospermic male. Fertil. Steril. 2008; 90:S74–S77.Google Scholar
Arnedo, N, Nogues, C, Bosch, M, Templado, C. Mitotic and meiotic behaviour of a naturally transmitted ring Y chromosome: reproductive risk evaluation. Hum. Reprod. 2005; 20:462–468.Google Scholar
Stouffs, K, Tournaye, H, Liebaers, I, Lissens, W. Male infertility and the involvement of the X chromosome. Hum. Reprod. Update 2009; 15:623–637.Google Scholar
Galani, A, Kitsiou-Tzeli, S, Sofokleous, C, Kanavakis, E, Kalpini-Mavrou, A. Androgen insensitivity syndrome: clinical features and molecular defects. Hormones (Athens) 2008; 7:217–229.Google Scholar
Hiort, O, Holterhus, PM, Horter, T, et al. Significance of mutations in the androgen receptor gene in males with idiopathic infertility. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2000; 85:2810–2815.Google Scholar
Mifsud, A, Sim, CK, Boettger-Tong, H, et al. Trinucleotide (CAG) repeat polymorphisms in the androgen receptor gene: molecular markers of risk for male infertility. Fertil. Steril. 2001; 75:275–281.Google Scholar
Sharma, V, Singh, R, Thangaraj, K, Jyothy, A. A novel Arg615Ser mutation of androgen receptor DNA-binding domain in three 46,XY sisters with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome and bilateral inguinal hernia. Fertil. Steril. 2011; 95:804.e19–804.e21.Google Scholar
Yuan, S, Meng, L, Zhang, Y, et al. Genotype-phenotype correlation and identification of two novel SRD5A2 mutations in 33 Chinese patients with hypospadias. Steroids 2017; 125:61–66.Google Scholar
Li, SP, Li, LW, Sun, MX, et al. Identification of a novel mutation in the SRD5A2 gene of one patient with 46,XY disorder of sex development. Asian J. Androl. 2018; 20:518–519.Google Scholar
La Vignera, S, Calogero, AE, Condorelli, R, et al. Cryptorchidism and its long-term complications. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2009; 13:351–356.Google Scholar
Caroppo, E, Niederberger, C, Elhanbly, S, et al. Effect of cryptorchidism and retractile testes on male factor infertility: a multicenter, retrospective, chart review. Fertil. Steril. 2005; 83:1581–1584.Google Scholar
Ferlin, A, Zuccarello, D, Garolla, A, Selice, R, Foresta, C. Hormonal and genetic control of testicular descent. RBM Online 2007; 15:659–665.Google ScholarPubMed
Kerr, CL, Cheng, L. The dazzle in germ cell differentiation. J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2010; 2:26–29.Google Scholar
Albuisson, J, Pecheux, C, Carel, JC, et al. Kallmann syndrome: 14 novel mutations in KAL1 and FGFR1 (KAL2). Hum. Mutat. 2005; 25:98–99.Google Scholar
Trarbach, EB, Baptista, MT, Garmes, HM, Hackel, C. Molecular analysis of KAL-1, GnRH-R, NELF and EBF2 genes in a series of Kallmann syndrome and normosmic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism patients. J. Endocrinol. 2005; 187:361–368.Google Scholar
Dodé, C, Teixeira, L, Levilliers, J, et al. Kallmann syndrome: mutations in the genes encoding prokineticin-2 and prokineticin receptor-2. PLoS Genet. 2006; 2(10):e175. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020175.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×