Crossref Citations
This Book has been
cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Bevir, Mark
and
Rhodes, R. A. W.
1999.
Studying British Government: Reconstructing the Research Agenda.
The British Journal of Politics and International Relations,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 2,
p.
215.
Bevir, Mark
2000.
Historical explanation, folk psychology, and narrative.
Philosophical Explorations,
Vol. 3,
Issue. 2,
p.
152.
Guilhaumou, Jacques
2000.
De l'histoire des concepts à l'histoire linguistique des usages conceptuels.
Genèses,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 1,
p.
105.
Bevir, Mark
2000.
Philosophy, Rhetoric, and Power: A Response to Critics.
Rethinking History,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 3,
p.
341.
Bevir, Mark
2000.
The Role of Contexts in Understanding and Explanation.
Human Studies,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 4,
p.
395.
Bevir, Mark
2000.
The Logic of the History of Ideas.
Rethinking History,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 3,
p.
295.
Bevir, Mark
2000.
New Labour: A Study in Ideology.
The British Journal of Politics and International Relations,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 3,
p.
277.
Ankersmit, F.R.
2000.
Comments on Bevir's The Logic of the History of Ideas.
Rethinking History,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 3,
p.
321.
Stuurman, Siep
2000.
On Intellectual Innovation and the Methodology of the History of Ideas.
Rethinking History,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 3,
p.
311.
Mayhew, Robert J.
2000.
Enlightenment Geography.
p.
1.
Palonen, Kari
2000.
Logic or Rhetoric in the History of Political Thought? Comments on Mark Bevir.
Rethinking History,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 3,
p.
301.
O'Brien, David
2000.
Reconstructing Social Democracy: New Labour and the Welfare State.
The British Journal of Politics and International Relations,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 3,
p.
403.
Kim, Youngmin
2000.
RETHINKING THE SELF'S RELATION TO THE WORLD IN THE MID-MING: FOUR RESPONSES TO CHENG-ZHU LEARNING.
Ming Studies,
Vol. 2000,
Issue. 1,
p.
13.
Guilhaumou, Jacques
2001.
L’histoire des concepts: le contexte historique en débat (note critique).
Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales,
Vol. 56,
Issue. 3,
p.
685.
Hoeschen, Andreas
2001.
‚Geistesgeschichte’ versus ‚History of Ideas’? Ernst Cassirers Beitrag zur ideengeschichtlichen Begriffsbildung im Kontext der Lovejoy-Spitzer-Kontroverse.
Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte,
Vol. 75,
Issue. 1,
p.
145.
Nünning, Ansgar
2001.
Metzler Lexikon Literatur- und Kulturtheorie.
p.
262.
Bevir, Mark
and
Trentmann, Frank
2001.
Social Justice and Modern Capitalism: Historiographical Problems, Theoretical Perspectives.
The European Legacy,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 2,
p.
141.
Mayhew, Robert J.
2001.
The effacement of early modern geography (c.1600–1850): a historiographical essay.
Progress in Human Geography,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 3,
p.
383.
Hay, Colin
2001.
The Invocation of External Economic Constraint: A Genealogy of the Concept of Globalization in the Political Economy of the British Labour Party, 1973—2000.
The European Legacy,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 2,
p.
233.
Bevir, Mark
and
Rhodes, R. A.W.
2001.
Decentering Tradition.
Administration & Society,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 2,
p.
107.