Achinstein, P. (2001) The Book of Evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Ackermann, R. (1989) “The New Experimentalism,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40: 185–90
Allais, M. (1953) “The Foundations of a Positive Theory of Choice Involving Risk and a Criticism of the Postulate and Axioms of the American School,” in Allais, M. and Hagen, O. (eds. 1979) Expected Utility Hypothesis and the Allais Paradox. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 257–332
American Economic Review (1992) Symposium on “Theory and Misbehavior of First-price Auctions.” Vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 1374–443
Anand, P. (1993) Foundations of Rational Choice under Risk. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Anderson, S. P., Goeree, J. K., and Holt, C. A. (1998) “A Theoretical Analysis of Altruism and Decision Error in Public Goods Games,” Journal of Public Economics 70: 297–323
Andreoni, J. (1995) “Warm Glow vs. Cold Prickle: The Effects of Positive and Negative Framing on Cooperation in Experiments,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110: 1–21
Ankeny, R. (2001) “Model Organisms as Models: Understanding the ‘Lingua Franca’ of the Human Genome Project,” Philosophy of Science 68: S251–61
Anscombe, E. (1971) Causality and Determinism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Aristotle, . Topics Books I and VII, with Excerpts from Related Texts. Oxford: Clarendon, 1997
Ayres, I. and Cramton, P. (1996) “Deficit Reduction through Diversity: A Case Study of How Affirmative Action at the FCC Increased Auction Competition,” Stanford Law Review 48: 761–815
Backhouse, R. E. (1994) “The Lakatosian Legacy in Economic Methodology,” in Backhouse, R. E. (ed.) New Directions in Economic Methodology. London: Routledge, pp. 173–91
Backhouse, R. E. (1997) Truth and Progress in Economic Knowledge. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
Bacon, F. (1620) Novum Organum. Chicago: Open Court, 1994
Bardsley, N. (in press) “Experimental Economics and the ‘Artificiality of Alteration,’” Journal of Economic Methodology
Baron, J. (2001) “Purposes and Method,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 403
Becker, G. M., DeGroot, M. H., and Marschak, J. (1963) “Stochastic Models of Choice Behaviour,” Behavioral Science 8: 41–55
Becker, G. M., DeGroot, M. H., and Marschak, J. (1964) “Measuring Utility by a Single-Response Sequential Method,” Behavioral Science 9: 226–32
Berg, J. E., Dickhaut, J. W., and O'Brien, J. R. (1985) “Preference Reversal and Arbitrage,” Research in Experimental Economics 3: 31–71
Bergstrom, T. C. and Miller, J. H. (1997) Experiments with Economic Principles: Microeconomics. New York: McGraw-Hill
Berkovitz, L. and Donnerstein, E. (1982) “External Validity Is More than Skin Deep,” American Psychologist 37: 245–57
Bernard, C. (1865) Introduction à l'étude de la Medicine Experimentale. Paris: Flammarion; Engl. transl. Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine. New York: Henri Schumann, 1957
Betsch, T. and Haberstroh, S. (2001) “Financial Incentives Do Not Pave the Road to Good Experimentation,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 404
Binmore, K. (1992) Fun and Games: A Text on Game Theory. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath & Co.
Binmore, K. (1999) “Why Experiment in Economics?,” Economic Journal 109: F16–24
Binmore, K. and Klemperer, P. (2002) “The Biggest Auction Ever: The Sale of the British 3G Telecom Licences,” Economic Journal 112: C74–96
Blaug, M. (1980) The Methodology of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Bogen, J.. and Woodward, J. (1988) “Saving the Phenomena,” Philosophical Review 97: 303–52
Boumans, M. and Morgan, M. S. (2000) “Ceteris Paribus Conditions: Materiality and the Application of Economic Theory,” Journal of Economic Methodology 8: 11–26
Brown, J. R. (1991) Laboratory of the Mind: Thought Experiments in the Natural Sciences. London: Routledge
Brown, J. R. (1994) Smoke and Mirrors: How Science Reflects Reality. London: Routledge
Brunsvik, E. (1955) “Representative Design and Probabilistic Theory in a Functional Psychology,” Psychological Review 62: 193–217
Buchwald, J. Z. (1994) The Creation of Scientific Effects. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Burlando, R. M. and Guala, F. (in press) “Heterogeneous Agents in Public Goods Experiments,” Experimental Economics
Burlando, R. M. and P. Webley (1999) “Individual Differences and Long-run Equilibria in a Public Good Experiment,” in Inquiries into the Nature and Causes of Behavior. Proceedings of the 24th IAREP Annual Colloquium, Belgirate, Italy
Bykowsky, M. M., Cull, R. J., and Ledyard, J. O. (2000) “Mutually Destructive Bidding: The FCC Auction Design Problem,” Journal of Regulatory Economics 17: 205–28
Caldwell, B. J. (1991) “Clarifying Popper,” Journal of Economic Literature 29: 1–33
Camerer, C. F. (1995) “Individual Decision Making,” in Kagel, J. H. and Roth, A. E. (eds.) The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 587–703
Camerer, C. F. and Hogarth, R. M. (1999) “The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor-Production Framework,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19: 7–42
Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G., and Prelec, E. D. (in press) “Neuroecono-mics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics,” Journal of Economic Perspectives
Campbell, C. M., Kagel, J. H., and Levin, D. (1999) “The Winner's Curse and Public Information in Common Value Auctions: Reply,” American Economic Review 89: 325–34
Campbell, D. and Stanley, J. (1963) Experimental and Quasi–Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally
Capen, E. C., Clapp, R. V., and Campbell, W. M. (1971) “Competitive Bidding in High-Risk Situations,” Journal of Petroleum Technology 23: 641–53
Carnap, R. (1950) Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Carpenter, K. J. (1986) The History of Scurvy and Vitamin C. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Cartwright, N. (1983) How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Cartwright, N. (1989) Nature's Capacities and Their Measurement. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Cartwright, N. (1991) “Replicability, Reproducibility, and Robustness: Comments on Harry Collins,” History of Political Economy 23: 143–55
Cartwright, N. (1999) The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Chew, S. H. and K. MacCrimmon (1979) “Alpha-Nu Choice Theory: A Generalization of Expected Utility Theory,” Working Paper no. 686. Faculty of Commerce and Business Administration, University of British Columbia
Christensen, L. B. (2001) Experimental Methodology, 8th ed. Needham Heights, Mass.: Allyn & Bacon
Chu, Y. P. and Chu, R. L. (1990) “The Subsidence of Preference Reversals in Simplified and Marketlike Experimental Settings: A Note,” American Economic Review 80: 902–11
Collins, H. M. (1985) Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. London: Sage
Collins, H. M. (1994) “A Strong Confirmation of the Experimenter's Regress,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 25: 493–503
Collins, H. M. and Pinch, T. (1993) The Golem: What You Should Know about Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Conlisk, J. (1983) “Three Variants on the Allais Example,” American Economic Review 79: 392–407
Cook, T. and Campbell, D. (1979) Quasi–experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Chicago: Rand McNally
Cox, J. C., Dinkin, S. H., and Smith, V. L. (1999) “The Winner's Curse and Public Information in Common Value Auctions: Comment,” American Economic Review 89: 319–24
Cox, J. C. and Epstein, S. (1989) “Preference Reversals without the Independence Axiom,” American Economic Review 79: 408–26
Cox, J. C. and Grether, D. M. (1996) “The Preference Reversal Phenomenon: Response Mode, Markets and Incentives,” Economic Theory 7: 381–405
Cox, J. C. and R. M. Isaac (1986) “Experimental Economics and Experimental Psychology: Ever the Twain Shall Meet?,” in MacFadyen, A. J. and MacFadyen, H. W. (eds.) Economic Psychology: Interactions in Theory and Application. New York: North Holland, pp. 647–69
Cox, J. C., B. Robertson, and V. L. Smith (1982) “Theory and Behavior of Single Object Auctions,” in Smith, V. L. (ed.) Research in Experimental Economics. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, pp. 1–43
Cramton, P. C. (1995) “Money Out of Thin Air: The Nationwide Narrowband PCS Auction,” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 4: 267–343
Cramton, P. C. (1997) “The FCC Spectrum Auctions: An Early Assessment,” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 6: 431–95
Cramton, P. C. (1998) “The Efficiency of the FCC Spectrum Auctions,” Journal of Law and Economics 41: 727–36
Cramton, P. C. and Schwartz, J. (2000) “Collusive Bidding: Lessons from the FCC Spectrum Auction,” Journal of Regulatory Economics 17: 229–52
Cross, R. (1982) “The Duhem-Quine Thesis, Lakatos and the Appraisal of Theories in Macroeconomics,” Economic Journal 92: 320–40
Cubitt, R. P. (in press) “Experiments and the Domain of Economic Theory,” Journal of Economic Methodology
Cubitt, R. P., Starmer, C., and Sugden, R. (2001) “Discovered Preferences and the Experimental Evidence of Violations of Expected Utility Theory,” Journal of Economic Methodology 8: 385–414
Cunningham, A. and Williams, P. (eds. 1992) The Laboratory Revolution in Medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Davis, D. D. and Holt, C. H. (1993) Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Dawes, R. M. and Thaler, R. H. (1988) “Anomalies: Cooperation,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 2: 187–97
Vroey, M. (1998) “Is the Tâtonnement Hypothesis a Good Caricature of Market Forces?,” Journal of Economic Methodology 5: 201–22
Dooley, D. (2001) Social Research Methods, 3rd ed. London: Prentice Hall
Dorling, J. (1979) “Bayesian Personalism, the Methodology of Research Programmes, and Duhem's Problem,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 10: 177–87
Duhem, P. (1906) La théorie physique. Son objet et sa structure. Paris: Chevalier et Rivière; Engl. transl. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1954
Dupré, J. (1984) “Probabilistic Causality Emancipated,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 9: 169–75
Dupré, J. (1993) The Disorder of Things. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
Dupré, J. (2001) “Economics without Mechanism,” in Mäki, U. (ed.) The Economic World View. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 308–32
Earman, J. (1992) Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
Earman, J. and Glymour, C. (1980) “Relativity and the Eclipses: The British Eclipse Expedition and Their Predecessors,” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 11: 49–85
Economics Focus (1999) “News from the Lab,” The Economist, May 8, p. 96
Ehrhart, K. M. and C. Keser (1199) “Mobility and Cooperation: On the Run,” Working Paper 99s–24, CIRANO, University of Montreal
Falk, A. and U. Fischbacher (2000) “A Theory of Reciprocity,” Working Paper 6/2000. Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich
Fehr, E. and Fishbacher, U. (2002) “Why Social Preferences Matter – The Impact of Non-selfish Motives on Competition, Cooperation and Incentives,” Economic Journal 112: C1–33
Feyerabend, P. K. (1975) Against Method. London: Verso, 2nd ed. 1993
Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S., and Fehr, E. (2001) “Are People Conditionally Cooperative? Evidence from a Public Goods Experiment,” Economics Letters 71: 397–404
Fisher, R. A. (1956) Statistical Methods and Scientific Inference. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd
Fischhoff, B. (1982) “Debiasing,” in Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. (eds.) Judgment under Uncertainty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 422–44
Fischhoff, B. (1996) “The Real World: What Good Is It?,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 65: 232–48
Flexner, S. and Lewis, P. (1910) “Experimental Poliomyelitis in Monkeys; Active Immunization and Passive Serum Protection,” Journal of the American Medical Association 54: 1780
Fodor, J. A. (1974) “Special Sciences (or: The Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis),” Synthese 28: 97–115
Fodor, J. A. (1987) Psychosemantics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
Fodor, J. A. (1989) “Making Mind Matter More,” Philosophical Topics 17: 59–79
Fontaine, P. (2002) “Blood, Politics, and Social Science,” Isis 94: 401–34
Forster, M. and Sober, E. (1994) “How to Tell When Simpler, More Unified, or Less Ad Hoc Theories Will Provide More Accurate Predictions,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45: 1–35
Forster, M. and E. Sober (in press) “Why Likelihood?,” in Taper, M. and Lee, S. (eds.) The Nature of Scientific Evidence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Fouraker, L. E. and Siegel, S. (1963) Bargaining Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill
Frank, R., Gilovich, T., and Regan, D. (1993) “Does Studying Economics Inhibit Cooperation?,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 7: 159–71
Frankfort-Nachmias, C. and Nachmias, D. (1996) Research Methods in the Social Sciences. London: Arnold
Franklin, A. (1986) The Neglect of Experiment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Franklin, A. (1990) Experiment, Right or Wrong. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Franklin, A. (1994) “How to Avoid the Experimenter's Regress,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 15: 51–62
Franklin, A. (1998) “Experiment in Physics,” in E. N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/physics-experiment
Frey, B. and Meier, S. (2003) “Are Political Economists Selfish and Indoctrinated? Evidence from a Natural Experiment,” Economic Inquiry 41: 448–62
Friedman, D. and Cassar, A. (2004) Economics Lab: An Intensive Course in Experimental Economics. London: Routledge
Friedman, D. and Sunder, S. (1994) Experimental Methods: A Primer for Economists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Friedman, M. (1953) “The Methodology of Positive Economics,” in Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 3–43
Friedman, M. (1999) Reconsidering Logical Positivism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Gachter, S. and C. Thoni (2004) “Social Learning and Voluntary Cooperation among Like-Minded People,” unpublished paper, University of St. Gallen
Galison, P. (1987) How Experiments End. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Galison, P. (1997) Image and Logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Giere, R. N. (1977) “Testing vs. Information Models of Scientific Inference,” in Colodny, R. G. (ed.) Logic, Laws, and Life: Some Philosophical Complications. University of Pittsburgh Series in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 6. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 19–70
Giere, R. N. (1979) Understanding Scientific Reasoning. New York: Harcourt Brace, 4th ed. 1997
Giere, R. N. (1983) “Testing Theoretical Hypotheses,” in Earman, J. (ed.) Testing Scientific Theories. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 10. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 269–98
Giere, R. N. (1988) Explaining Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Giere, R. N. (2002) “Models as Parts of Distributed Cognitive Systems,” in Magnani, L. and Nersessian, N. J. (eds.) Model-Based Reasoning: Science, Technology, Values. New York: Kluwer, pp. 227–41
Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P., and the ABC Research Group (1999) Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Gillies, D. (1991) “Intersubjective Probability and Confirmation Theory,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42: 513–33
Gillies, D. (1993) Philosophy of Science in the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Blackwell
Glennan, S. (2002) “Rethinking Mechanistic Explanation,” Philosophy of Science 69: S342–53
Gooding, D. (1990) Experiment and the Making of Meaning. Dordrecht: Kluwer
Granger, C. W. J. (1980) “Testing for Causality: A Personal Viewpoint,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 2: 329–52
Grether, D. and Plott, C. (1979) “Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon,” American Economic Review 69: 623–38
Guala, F. (1998) “Experiments as Mediators in the Non-Laboratory Sciences,” Philosophica 62: 901–18
Guala, F. (1999) “The Problem of External Validity (or ‘Parallelism’) in Experimental Economics,” Social Science Information 38: 555–73
Guala, F. (2000a) “Artefacts in Experimental Economics: Preference Reversals and the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak Mechanism,” Economics and Philosophy 16: 47–75
Guala, F. (2000b) “The Logic of Normative Falsification: Rationality and Experiments in Decision Theory,” Journal of Economic Methodology 7: 59–93
Guala, F. (2001) “Building Economic Machines: The FCC Auctions,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 32: 453–77
Guala, F. (2002a) “Models, Simulations, and Experiments,” in Magnani, L. and Nersessian, N. J. (eds.) Model-Based Reasoning: Science, Technology, Values. New York: Kluwer, pp. 59–74
Guala, F. (2002b) “On the Scope of Experiments in Economics: Comments on Siakantaris,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 26: 261–7
Guala, F. (2003) “Experimental Localism and External Validity,” Philosophy of Science 70: 1195–205
Guala, F. and L. Mittone (2002) “Experiments in Economics: Testing Theories vs. the Robustness of Phenomena,” CEEL Working Paper 09–02, University of Trento
Hacking, I. (1965) Logic of Statistical Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Hacking, I. (1983) Representing and Intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Hacking, I. (1988) “The Participant Irrealist at Large in the Laboratory,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39: 277–94
Hacking, I. (1989) “Extragalactic Reality: The Case of Gravitational Lensing,” Philosophy of Science 56: 555–81
Hacking, I. (1992) “The Self-Vindication of the Laboratory Sciences,” in Pickering, A. (ed.) Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 29–64
Hands, D. W. (1985) “Second Thoughts on Lakatos,” History of Political Economy 17: 1–16
Hands, D. W. (2001) Reflection without Rules: Economic Methodology and Contemporary Science Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Harding, S. (ed. 1976) Can Theories Be Refuted?Dordrecht: Reidel
Hargreaves Heap, S. and Y. Varoufakis (1995) “Experimenting with Neoclassical Economics: A Critical Review of Experimental Economics,” in Rima, I. H. (ed.) Measurement, Quantification and Economic Analysis. London: Routledge
Harrison, G. W. (1989) “Theory and Misbehavior of First-Price Auctions,” American Economic Review 79: 749–62
Harrison, G. W. (1994) “Expected Utility Theory and the Experimentalists,” Empirical Economics 19: 223–54
Harrison, G. W. and List, J. A. (2004) “Field Experiments,” Journal of Economic Literature 42(4), 1013–59
Hausman, D. M. (1989) “Ceteris Paribus Clauses and Causality in Economics,” PSA 1988, Vol. 2. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association
Hausman, D. M. (1990) “Supply and Demand Explanations and Their Ceteris Paribus Clauses,” Review of Political Economy 2: 168–87; reprinted in Essays on Philosophy and Economic Methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992
Hausman, D. M. (1992a) The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Hausman, D. M. (1992b) “Why Look under the Hood?,” in Essays in Philosophy and Economic Methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 70–3
Hausman, D. M. (1998a) Causal Asymmetries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Hausman, D. M. (1998b) “Problems with Realism in Economics,” Economics and Philosophy 14: 185–213
Hausman, D. M. (2000) “Revealed Preference, Belief, and Game Theory,” Economics and Philosophy 16: 99–115
Hausman, D. M. (2001) “Explanation and Diagnosis in Economics,” Revue internationale de philosophie 217: 311–26
Hausman, D. M. (in press) “Constructing Experimental Games,” Journal of Economic Methodology
Hausman, D. M. (unpublished) “Probabilistic Causality and Practical Causal Generalizations,” University of Wisconsin-Madison
Hausman, D. M. and P. Mongin (1998) “Economists' Responses to Anomalies: Full-Cost Pricing versus Preference Reversals,” in Davis, J. (ed.) New Economics and Its History. History of Political Economy Supplement, Vol. 29. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 255–72
Hempel, C. G. (1952) Fundamentals of Concept-Formation in Empirical Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Hempel, C. G. (1965) Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: Free Press
Hendry, R. (1980) “Econometrics – Alchemy or Science?,” Economica 47: 387–406
Henshel, R. L. (1980) “The Purposes of Laboratory Experimentation and the Virtues of Deliberate Artificiality,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 16: 466–78
Herstein, I. and Milnor, J. (1953) “An Axiomatic Approach to Measurable Utility,” Econometrica 47: 291–7
Hertwig, R. and Ortmann, A. (2001) “Experimental Practices in Economics: A Methodological Challenge for Psychologists?,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 383–451
Hesse, M. B. (1963) Models and Analogies in Science. London: Sheed & Ward
Hey, J. D. (1991) Experiments in Economics. Oxford: Blackwell
Hogarth, R. M. and Reder, M. W. (eds. 1986) Rational Choice: The Contrast between Economics and Psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Holst, A. and Frölich, T. (1907) “Experimental Studies Relating to Ship-Beri-Beri and Scurvy. II., On the Etiology of Scurvy,” Journal of Hygiene 7: 634–71
Holt, C. A. (1986) “Preference Reversals and the Independence Axiom,” American Economic Review 76: 508–15
Hon, G. (1989) “Towards a Typology of Experimental Error: An Epistemological View,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 20: 469–504
Hoover, K. D. (2001) Causality in Macroeconomics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Howson, C. (1997a) “A Logic of Induction,” Philosophy of Science 64: 268–90
Howson, C. (1997b) “Error Probabilities in Error,” Philosophy of Science 64: S185–94
Howson, C. and Urbach, P. (1989) Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach. Chicago: Open Court
Hughes, R. I. G. (1997) “Models and Representation,” Philosophy of Science 64: S325–36
Hughes, R. I. G. (1999) “The Ising Model, Computer Simulation, and Universal Physics,” in Morgan, M. S. and Morrison, M. C. (eds.) Models as Mediators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 97–145
Hume, D. (1740) A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978
Humphreys, P. (1989) The Chances of Explanation. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Ingrao, B. and Israel, G. (1987) La mano invisibile. Bari: Laterza; Engl. transl. The Invisible Hand. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1990
Isaac, R. M., McCue, K. F., and Plott, C. R. (1985) “Public Goods Provision in an Experimental Environment,” Journal of Public Economics 26: 51–74
Isaac, R. M. and Walker, J. M. (1998) “Nash as an Organizing Principle in the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods: An Experimental Analysis,” Experimental Economics 1: 191–206
Isaac, R. M., Walker, J. M., and Thomas, S. (1984) “Divergent Evidence on Free-Riding: An Experimental Examination of Possible Explanations,” Public Choice 43: 113–49
Kagel, J. H. and Levin, D. (1986) “The Winner's Curse Phenomenon and Public Information in Common Value Auctions,” American Economic Review 76: 894–920
Kagel, J. H. and Roth, A. E. (eds. 1995) The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Karni, E. and Safra, Z. (1987) “‘Preference Reversal’ and the Observability of Preferences by Experimental Methods,” Econometrica 55: 675–85
Keller, L. R., Segal, U., and Wang, T. (1993) “The Becker-DeGroot-Marschak Mechanism and Generalized Utility Theories: Theoretical Predictions and Empirical Observations,” Theory and Decision 34: 83–97
Keser, C. (1996) “Voluntary Contributions to a Public Good When Partial Contribution Is a Dominant Strategy,” Economics Letters 50: 359–66
Kim, O. and Walker, J. M. (1984) “The Free Rider Problem: Experimental Evidence,” Public Choice 43: 3–24
Kincaid, H. (1996) Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Kitcher, P. (1981) “Explanatory Unification,” Philosophy of Science 48: 507–31
Kitcher, P. (1993) The Advancement of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Klemperer, P. (2002) “How (Not) to Run Auctions: The European 3G Telecom Auctions,” European Economic Review 46: 829–45
Klemperer, P. (2004) Auctions: Theory and Practice. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Knez, M. and V. L. Smith (1987) “Hypothetical Valuations and Preference Reversals in the Context of Asset Trading,” in Roth, A. E. (ed.) Laboratory Experimentation in Economics: Six Points of View. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 131–54
Kohler, R. E. (1994) Lords of the Fly. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Kruglanski, A. W. (1975) “The Human Subject in the Psychology Experiment: Fact and Artifact,” in Berkovitz, L. (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 8. New York: Academic Press, pp. 101–47
Kuhn, T. S. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2nd ed. 1970
Kwerel, E. R. (2004) “Foreword,” in Milgrom, P., Putting Auction Theory to Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. ⅹⅴ–ⅹⅹⅱ
Kwerel, E. R. and Rosston, G. L. (2000) “An Insider's View of FCC Spectrum Auctions,” Journal of Regulatory Economics 17: 253–89
LaFollette, H. and Shanks, N. (1995) “Two Models of Models in Biomedical Research,” Philosophical Quarterly 45: 141–60
Lakatos, I. (1970) “Falsificationism and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes,” in The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978, pp. 8–101
Lakatos, I. (1974) “Popper on Demarcation and Induction,” in The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978, pp. 139–67
Latour, B. (1984) Les microbes: guerre et paix. Paris: Métailié; Engl. transl. The Pasteurisation of France. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1988
Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
Latour, B. (1988) “Comments on ‘The Sociology of Knowledge of Child Abuse’,” Nous 22: 67–9
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2nd ed. 1986
Latsis, S. (ed. 1976) Method and Appraisal in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Lawson, T. (1997) Economics and Reality. London: Routledge
Ledyard, J. O. (1995) “Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research,” in Kagel, J. H. and Roth, A. E. (eds.) The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 111–94
Ledyard, J. O., Porter, D., and Rangel, A. (1997) “Experiments Testing Multiobject Allocation Mechanisms,” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 6: 639–75
Lee, K. S. (unpublished) “Rationality, Minds, and Machines in the Laboratory: A Thematic History of Vernon Smith's Experimental Economics,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Notre Dame
Leonard, R. (1994) “Laboratory Strife: Higgling as Experimental Science in Economics and Social Psychology,” in Marchi, N. B. and Morgan, M. S. (eds.) Higgling. History of Political Economy Supplement, Vol. 26. Durham: Duke University Press
Lichtenstein, S. and Slovic, P. (1968) “Relative Importance of Probabilities and Payoffs in Risk-Taking,” Journal of Experimental Psychology Supplement, Part 2: 1–18
Lichtenstein, S. and Slovic, P. (1971) “Reversals of Preference Between Bids and Choices in Gambling Decisions,” Journal of Experimental Psychology 89: 46–55
Lichtenstein, S. and Slovic, P. (1973) “Response-Induced Reversals of Preference in Gambling: An Extended Replication in Las Vegas,” Journal of Experimental Psychology 101: 16–20
Lipton, P. (1991) Inference to the Best Explanation. London: Routledge
Loewenstein, G. (1999) “Experimental Economics from the Vantage-Point of Behavioral Economics,” Economic Journal 109: F25–34
Loomes, G. (1989) “Experimental Economics,” in Hey, J. D. (ed.) Current Issues in Microeconomics. New York: St. Martin's Press, pp. 152–78
Loomes, G., Starmer, C., and Sugden, R. (1989) “Preference Reversal: Information-Processing Effect or Rational Non-Transitive Choice?,” Economic Journal 99: 140–51
Loomes, G. and Sugden, R. (1995) “Incorporating a Stochastic Element into Decision Theories,” European Economic Review 39: 641–8
Lucas, R. E. (1982) Studies in Business Cycle Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
Luce, R. D. and Raiffa, H. (1957) Games and Decisions. New York: Wiley
Lynch, M. (1985) Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science. London: Routledge
Machamer, P., Darden, L., and Craver, C. F. (2000) “Thinking about Mechanisms,” Philosophy of Science 67: 1–25
Machina, M. J. (1982) “‘Expected Utility’ Analysis without the Independence Axiom,” Econometrica 50: 277–323
Mackie, J. L. (1974) The Cement of the Universe. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Mäki, U. (1996) “Scientific Realism and Some Peculiarities of Economics,” Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 69: 424–65
Mäki, U. (2001a) “Models,” in Smelser, N. J. and Baltes, P. B. (eds.) The International Encyclopaedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 15. London: Elsevier, pp. 9931–7
Mäki, U. (2001b) “Explanatory Unification: Double and Doubtful,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31: 488–506
Mäki, U. (in press) “Models Are Experiments, Experiments Are Models,” Journal of Economic Methodology
Mäki, U. and J. P. Piimies (1998) “Ceteris Paribus,” in Davis, J. B., Hands, D. W., and Mäki, U. (eds.) The Handbook of Economic Methodology. Cheltenham: Elgar, pp. 55–9
Marschak, J. (1950) “Rational Behaviour, Uncertain Prospects, and Measurable Utility,” Econometrica 18: 111–41
Marwell, G. and Ames, R. E. (1981) “Economists Free Ride, Does Anyone Else?,” Journal of Public Economics 15: 295–310
Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., and Green, J. R. (1995) Microeconomic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Mayo, D. (1996) Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Mayo, D. (1997a) “Response to Howson and Laudan,” Philosophy of Science 64: 323–33
Mayo, D. (1997b) “Error Statistics and Learning from Error: Making a Virtue of Necessity,” Philosophy of Science 64: S195–212
McAfee, R. P. and McMillan, J. (1987) “Auctions and Bidding,” Journal of Economic Literature 25: 699–738
McAfee, R. P. and McMillan, J. (1996) “Analyzing the Airwaves Auction,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 10: 159–75
McCollum, E. V. and Pitz, W. (1917) “The ‘Vitamine’ Hypothesis and Deficiency Diseases. A Study of Experimental Scurvy,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 31: 229–53
McMillan, J. (1994) “Selling Spectrum Rights,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8: 145–62
McMillan, J. (1995) “Why Auction the Spectrum?,” Telecommunications Policy 19: 191–9
McMillan, J., Rotschild, M., and Wilson, R. (1997) “Introduction,” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 6: 425–30
Mead, W. J., Moseidjord, A., and Sorensen, P. E. (1983) “The Rate of Return Earned by Leases Under Cash Bonus Bidding in the OCS Oil and Gas Leases,” Energy Journal 4: 37–52
Meyer, B. D., Viscusi, W. K., and Durbin, D. L. (1985) “Workers' Compensation and Injury Duration: Evidence from a Natural Experiment,” American Economic Review 85: 322–40
Michotte, A. (1946) La perception de la causalité. Louvain: Institut Supérieur de Philosophie; Engl. transl. The Perception of Causality. London: Methuen, 1963
Milgrom, P. (1989) “Auctions and Bidding: A Primer,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 3: 3–22
Milgrom, P. (1995) “Auctioning the Radio Spectrum,” preliminary draft of Milgrom (2004, Ch. 1). http://www.market-design.com/library.html
Milgrom, P. (1998) “Game Theory and the Spectrum Auctions,” European Economic Review 42: 771–8
Milgrom, P. (2000) “Putting Auction Theory to Work: The Simultaneous Ascending Auction,” Journal of Political Economy 108: 245–72
Milgrom, P. (2004) Putting Auction Theory to Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Milgrom, P. R. and Weber, R. J. (1982) “A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding,” Econometrica 50: 1089–122
Mill, J. S. (1836) “On the Definition of Political Economy and the Method of Investigation Proper to It,” in Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. 4. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1967, pp. 120–64
Mill, J. S. (1843) A System of Logic. London: Parker
Miller, D. (2002) “Induction: A Problem Solved,” in Böhm, J. M., Holweg, H., and Hoock, C. (eds.) Karl Poppers kritischer Rationalismus heute. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 81–106
Miller, R. M. (2002) Paving Wall Street: Experimental Economics and the Quest for the Perfect Market. New York: John Wiley & Sons
Minguzzi, G. F. (1961) “Caratteri espressi e intenzionali dei movimenti: la percezione dell'attesa,” Rivista di psicologia 55: 157–79
Mirowski, P. (1989) More Heat than Light. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Mirowski, P. (2002) Machine Dreams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Mirowski, P. and E. Nik-Kah (2004) “Markets Made Flesh: Callon, Performativty, and a Crisis in Science Studies, Augmented with Considerations of the FCC Auctions,” unpublished paper, University of Notre Dame
Mongin, P. (1988) “Problèmes de Duhem en théorie de l'utilité espérée,” Fundamenta Scientiae 9: 299–327
Mongin, P. (2000) “Les préférences révélées et la formation de la théorie de la demande,” Revue économique 51: 1125–52
Mongin, P. (2002) “La conception déductive de l'explication scientifique et l'économie,” Social Science Information 41:139–65
Morgan, M. S. (2001) “Models, Stories, and the Economic World,” Journal of Economic Methodology 8: 361–84
Morgan, M. S. (2002) “Model Experiments and Models in Experiments,” in Magnani, L. and Nersessian, N. J. (eds.) Model-Based Reasoning: Science, Technology, Values. New York: Kluwer, pp. 41–58
Morgan, M. S. and M. Boumans (2004) “The Secrets Hidden by Two-Dimensionality: Modelling the Economy as a Hydraulic System,” in Chadarevian, S. and Hopwood, N. (eds.) Models: The Third Dimension of Science. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 369–401
Morrison, M. C. (1998a) “Experiment,” in Craig, E. (ed.) The Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge, pp. 514–8
Morrison, M. C. (1998b) “Mediating Models: Between Physics and the Physical World,” Philosophia Naturalis 35: 65–85
Morrison, M. C. and M. S. Morgan (1999) “Models as Mediating Instruments,” in Morgan, M. S. and Morrison, M. C. (eds.) Models as Mediators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 10–37
Mulkay, M. and Gilbert, G. N. (1986) “Replication and Mere Replication,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 16: 21–37
Murray, J. (2002) Wireless Nation. Cambridge, Mass.: Perseus
Nagel, E. (1961) The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Wold
Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
Newton, I. (1687) Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica. London: Royal Society
Nik-Kah, E. (unpublished) “Designs on the Mechanism,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Notre Dame
Nobel Press Release (2002) “The Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel” http://www.nobel.se/economics/laureates/2002/
Norton, J. D. (1996) “Are Thought Experiments Just What You Thought?,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26: 333–66
Norton, J. D. (2003) “A Material Theory of Induction,” Philosophy of Science 70: 647–70
Nye, M. J. (1972) Molecular Reality. London: Macdonald
Offerman, T., Sonnemans, J., and Schram, A. (1996) “Value Orientations, Expectations, and Voluntary Contributions in Public Goods,” Economic Journal 106: 817–45
Orbell, J., Dawes, R., and Kragt, A. (1990) “The Limits of Multilateral Promising,” Ethics 100: 616–27
Page, T., L. Putterman, and B. Unel (2002) “Voluntary Association in Public Goods Experiments: Reciprocity, Mimicry, and Efficiency,” working paper, Brown University
Palfrey, T. R. and Prisbey, J. E. (1996) “Altruism, Reputation and Noise in Linear Public Goods Experiments,” Journal of Public Economics 61: 409–27
Palfrey, T. R. and Prisbey, J. E. (1997) “Anomalous Behavior in Public Goods Experiments: How Much and Why?,” American Economic Review 87: 829–46
Pasteur, L. (1881) “Compte rendu sommaire des expériences rates á Pouilly-le-Fort, prés Melun, sur la vaccination charbonneuse,” Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Science 92: 1378–83; Engl. tr. “Summary Report of the Experiments Conducted at Pouilly-le-Fort, Near Melun, on the Anthrax Vaccination,” Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 75 (2002): 59–62
Pasteur, L. (1922) Oeuvres Complètes. Paris: Masson
Paul, J. R. (1971) A History of Poliomyelitis. New Haven: Yale University Press
Pearl, J. (2000) Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Perrin, J. (1913) Les atomes. Paris: Alcan
Pickering, A. (1995) The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Plott, C. R. (1981) “Experimental Methods in Political Economy: A Tool for Regulatory Research,” in Ferguson, A. R. (ed.) Attacking Regulatory Problems. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, pp. 117–43
Plott, C. R. (1987) “Dimensions of Parallelism: Some Policy Applications of Experimental Methods,” in Roth, A. E. (ed.) Laboratory Experimentation in Economics: Six Points of View. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 193–219
Plott, C. R. (1991) “Will Economics Become an Experimental Science?,” Southern Economic Journal 57: 901–19
Plott, C. R. (1995) “Rational Individual Behaviour in Markets and Social Choice Processes: The Discovered Preference Hypothesis,” in Arrow, K. J., Colombatto, E., Perlman, M., and Schmidt, C. (eds.) The Rational Foundations of Economic Behaviour. London: Macmillan, pp. 225–50
Plott, C. R. (1996) “Laboratory Experimental Testbeds: Application to the PCS Auction,” Social Science Working Paper 957. California Institute of Technology
Plott, C. R. (1997) “Laboratory Experimental Testbeds: Application to the PCS Auction,” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 6: 605–38
Plott, C. R. (1999) “Policy and the Use of Laboratory Experimental Methodology in Economics,” in Luini, L. (ed.) Uncertain Decisions: Bridging Theory and Experiments. Boston: Kluwer, pp. 293–315
Plott, C. R. and Smith, V. L., eds. (in press) The Handbook of Experimental Economics Results. London: Elsevier
Pommerehne, W. W., Schneider, F., and Zweifel, P. (1982) “Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon: A Reexamination,” American Economic Review 72: 569–74
Popper, K. R. (1934) Logik der Forschung. Vienna: Springer; Engl. transl. Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson, 1959
Popper, K. R. (1957) “The Aim of Science,” Ratio 1: 24–35; reprinted in Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972
Popper, K. R. (1963) Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge
Popper, K. R. (1976) Unended Quest: An Intellectual Autobiography. London: Routledge
Psillos, S. (1999) Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks the Truth. London: Routledge
Putnam, H. (1975) Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1: Mathematics, Matter and Method, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Quiggin, J. (1982) “A Theory of Anticipated Utility,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3: 323–43
Quine, W. O. (1953) “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” in From A Logical Point of View. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, pp. 20–46
Rabin, M. (1993) “Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics,” American Economic Review 83: 1281–302
Rabin, M. (1998) “Psychology and Economics,” Journal of Economic Literature 35: 11–46
Rabin, M. (2002) “A Perspective on Psychology and Economics,” European Economic Review 46: 657–85
Radder, H. (1996) In and About the World: Philosophical Studies of Science and Technology. Albany: SUNY Press
Radder, H. (2002) “How Concepts Both Structure the World and Abstract from It,” Review of Metaphysics 55: 581–613
Read, D. (in press) “Monetary Incentives, What Are They Good for?,” Journal of Economic Methodology
Redhead, M. L. G. (1980) “A Bayesian Reconstruction of the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 11: 341–7
Reilly, R. J. (1982) “Preference Reversal: Further Evidence and Some Suggested Modifications in Experimental Design,” American Economic Review 72: 576–84
Rice, D. B. and V. L. Smith (1964) “Nature, the Experimental Laboratory, and the Credibility of Hypotheses,” Behavioral Science; reprinted in Smith, V., Papers in Experimental Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991
Robbins, L. (1932) An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London: Macmillan
Rosenberg, A. (1992) Economics: Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns?Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Rosenberg, A. (1996) “A Field Guide to Recent Species of Naturalism,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47: 1–29
Roth, A. E. (1986) “Laboratory Experimentation in Economics,” Economics and Philosophy 2: 245–73
Roth, A. E. (1988) “Laboratory Experimentation in Economics: A Methodological Overview,” Economic Journal 98: 974–1031
Roth, A. E. (1991) “Game Theory as a Part of Empirical Economics,” Economic Journal 101: 107–14
Roth, A. E. (1995) “Introduction to Experimental Economics,” in Kagel, J. H. and Roth, A. E. (eds.) The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 3–109
Roth, A. E. (2001) “Form and Function in Experimental Design,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 427–8
Roth, A. E. (2002) “The Economist as Engineer: Game Theory, Experimentation, and Computation as Tools for Design Economics,” Econometrica 70: 1341–78
Roth, A. E. and Malouf, M. W. K. (1979) “Game-Theoretic Models and the Role of Information in Bargaining,” Psychological Review 86: 574–94
Roth, A. E. and Peranson, E. (1999) “The Redesign of the Matching Market for American Physicians: Some Engineering Aspects of Economic Design,” American Economic Review 89: 748–80
Rubinstein, A. (2001) “A Theorist's View of Experiments,” European Economic Review 45: 615–28
Safra, Z., Segal, U., and Spivak, A. (1990a) “Preference Reversals and Non-expected Utility,” American Economic Review 80: 922–30
Safra, Z., Segal, U., and Spivak, A. (1990b) “The Becker-DeGroot-Marschak Mechanism and Non-expected Utility: A Testable Approach,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 3: 177–90
Salanti, A. (1994) “On the Lakatosian Apple of Discord in the History and Methodology of Economics,” Finnish Economic Papers 7: 30–41
Salmon, P. (1998) “Free Riding as a Mechanism,” in Backhouse, R. E., Hausman, D. M., Mäki, U., and Salanti, A. (eds.) Economics and Methodology: Crossing Boundaries. London: MacMillan, pp. 62–87
Salmon, W. C. (1984) Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Salmon, W. C. (1988) “Rational Prediction,” in Grünbaum, A. and Salmon, W. C. (eds.) The Limitations of Deductivism. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, pp. 47–60
Salmon, W. C. (1990) “Rationality and Objectivity in Science, or Tom Kuhn Meets Tom Bayes,” in Savage, C. W. (ed.) Scientific Theories. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 14. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 175–204
Samuelson, P. (1938) “A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer's Behavior,” Economica 5: 61–71
Savage, L. J. (1954) The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Dover Publications, 2nd ed. 1972
Sawyer, K. R., Beed, C., and Sankey, H. (1997) “Underdetermination in Economics. The Duhem-Quine Thesis,” Economics and Philosophy 13: 1–23
Schelling, T. C. (1978) Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: Norton
Schotter, A. (1998) “A Practical Person's Guide to Mechanism Selection: Some Lessons from Experimental Economics,” in Majumdar, M. (ed.) Organization with Incomplete Information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Segal, U. (1988) “Does the Preference Reversals Phenomenon Necessarily Contradict the Independence Axiom?,” American Economic Review 28: 175–202
Sen, A. (1973) “Behaviour and the Concept of Preference,” Economica 40: 241–59
Sen, A. (1993) “Internal Consistency of Choice,” Econometrica 61: 495–521
Siakantaris, N. (2000) “Experimental Economics Under the Microscope,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 24: 267–81
Simon, H. A. (1969) The Sciences of the Artificial. Boston: MIT Press
Slovic, P. (1995) “The Construction of Preferences,” American Psychologist 50: 364–71
Smith, V. L. (1962) “An Experimental Study of Competitive Market Behavior,” Journal of Political Economy 70: 111–37
Smith, V. L. (1976) “Experimental Economics: Induced Value Theory,” American Economic Review 66: 274–7
Smith, V. L. (1982) “Microeconomic Systems as an Experimental Science,” American Economic Review 72: 923–55
Smith, V. L. (1989) “Theory, Experiment and Economics,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 3: 151–69
Smith, V. L. (1991a) Papers in Experimental Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Smith, V. L. (1991b) “Rational Choice: The Contrast Between Economics and Psychology,” Journal of Political Economy 99: 877–97
Smith, V. L. (1992) “Game Theory and Experimental Economics: Beginnings and Early Influences,” in Weintraub, E. R. (ed.) Towards A History of Game Theory. History of Political Economy Supplement, Vol. 24. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 241–82
Smith, V. L. (1994) “Economics in the Laboratory,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8: 113–31
Smith, V. L. (2002) “Method in Experiment: Rhetoric and Reality,” Experimental Economics 5: 91–110
Smith, V. L. (in press) “Experimental Methods in (Neuro)Economics,” in Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science
Smith, V. L. and Walker, J. M. (1993) “Monetary Rewards and Decision Costs in Experimental Economics,” Economic Inquiry 31: 245–61
Sober, E. (1988) Reconstructing the Past: Parsimony, Evolution, and Inference. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
Sober, E. (2002) “Bayesianism – Its Scope and Limits,” in Swinburne, R. (ed.) Bayes' Theorem. Proceedings of the British Academy Press, Vol. 113: 21–38
Soberg, M. (in press) “The Duhem-Quine Thesis and Experimental Economics: A Reinterpretation,” Journal of Economic Methodology
Sorensen, R. (1992) Thought Experiments. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Starmer, C. (1999) “Experiments in Economics … (Should We Trust the Dismal Scientists in White Coats?),” Journal of Economic Methodology 6: 1–30
Starmer, C. (in press) “On Testing Game Theory,” Journal of Economic Methodology
Starmer, C. and Sugden, R. (1991) “Does the Random-Lottery Incentive System Elicit True Preferences? An Experimental Investigation,” American Economic Review 81: 971–8
Strand, R., Fjelland, R., and Flatmark, T. (1996) “In Vivo Interpretation of In Vitro Effect Studies,” Acta Biotheoretica 44: 1–21
Sugden, R. (1984) “Reciprocity: The Supply of Public Goods through Voluntary Contributions,” Economic Journal 94: 772–87
Sugden, R. (2000) “Credible Worlds: The Status of Theoretical Models in Economics,” Journal of Economic Methodology 7: 1–31
Sugden, R. (in press) “Experiments as Exhibits and Experiments as Tests,” Journal of Economic Methodology
Suppe, F., ed. (1977) The Structure of Scientific Theories. Urbana: University of Illinois Press
Suppe, F. (1989) The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism. Urbana: University of Illinois Press
Suppes, P. (1984) Probabilistic Metaphysics. London: Blackwell
Tammi, T. (1999) “Incentives and Preference Reversals: Escape Moves and Community Decisions,” Journal of Economic Methodology 6: 351–80
Thagard, P. (1999) How Scientists Explain Disease. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Thaler, R. H. (1988) “Anomalies: The Winner's Curse,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 2: 191–202
Thaler, R. H. and Tversky, A. (1990) “Anomalies: Preference Reversals,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 4: 201–11
Titmuss, R. M. (1970) The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy. London: Allen & Unwin
Tversky, A., Slovic, P., and Kahneman, D. (1990) “The Causes of Preference Reversals,” American Economic Review 80: 204–17
Uebel, T., ed. (1991) Rediscovering the Forgotten Vienna Circle. Dordrecht: Kluwer
Fraassen, B. (1980) The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Vugt, M. (2001) “Self-Interest as Self-Fulfilling Prophecy,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 429–30
Vickrey, W. (1961) “Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders,” Journal of Finance 16: 8–37
Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1944) The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Watkins, J. (1984) Science and Scepticism. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Weber, R. J. (1997) “Making More from Less: Strategic Demand Reduction in the FCC Spectrum Auctions,” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 6: 529–48
Weibull, J. W. (2002) “Testing Game Theory,” SSE Discussion Paper 382, Stockholm School of Economics
Wilde, L. L. (1981) “On the Use of Laboratory Experiments in Economics,” in Pitt, J. C. (ed.) Philosophy in Economics. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 137–48
Wilson, R. B. (1977) “A Bidding Model of Perfect Competition,” Review of Economic Studies 44: 511–8
Wilson, R. B. (2002) “Architecture of Power Markets,” Econometrica 70: 1299–340
Woodward, J. (1989) “Data and Phenomena,” Synthèse 79: 393–472
Woodward, J. (2002) “Experimentation, Causal Inference, and Instrumental Realism,” in Radder, H. (ed.) The Philosophy of Scientific Experimentation. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press, pp. 87–118
Woodward, J. (2003) Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Worrall, J. (1978) “The Ways in which the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes Improves on Popper's Methodology,” in Andersson, G. and Radnitzky, A. (eds.) Progress and Rationality of Science. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 45–70
Worrall, J. (1985) “Scientific Discovery and Theory-Confirmation,” in Pitt, J. (ed.) Change and Progress in Modern Science. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 301–31
Worrall, J. (1989) “Why Both Popper and Watkins Fail to Solve the Problem of Induction,” in D'Agostino, F. and Jarvie, I. C. (eds.) Freedom and Rationality: Essays in Honour of John Watkins. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 257–96
Worrall, J. (1993) “Falsification, Rationality, and the Duhem Problem,” in Earman, J., Janis, A., Massey, G., and Rescher, N. (eds.) Philosophical Problems of the Internal and External Worlds: Essays on the Philosophy of Adolf Grünbaum. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 329–70
Yaari, M. E. (1987) “The Dual Theory of Choice Under Risk,” Econometrica 55: 95–115
Zahar, E. (1976) “Why Did Einstein's Programme Supersede Lorentz's,” in Howson, C. (ed.) Method and Appraisal in the Physical Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 211–75
Zahar, E. (1983) “Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Invention?,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34: 243–61
