Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface and acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Case Study I The origins of Newton's laws of motion and of gravity
- Case Study II Maxwell's equations
- Case Study III Mechanics and dynamics – linear and non-linear
- Case Study IV Thermodynamics and statistical physics
- Case Study V The origins of the concept of quanta
- 11 Black-body radiation up to 1895
- 12 1895–1900: Planck and the spectrum of black-body radiation
- 13 Planck's theory of black-body radiation
- 14 Einstein and the quantisation of light
- 15 The triumph of the quantum hypothesis
- Case Study VI Special relativity
- Case Study VII General relativity and cosmology
- Index
13 - Planck's theory of black-body radiation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface and acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Case Study I The origins of Newton's laws of motion and of gravity
- Case Study II Maxwell's equations
- Case Study III Mechanics and dynamics – linear and non-linear
- Case Study IV Thermodynamics and statistical physics
- Case Study V The origins of the concept of quanta
- 11 Black-body radiation up to 1895
- 12 1895–1900: Planck and the spectrum of black-body radiation
- 13 Planck's theory of black-body radiation
- 14 Einstein and the quantisation of light
- 15 The triumph of the quantum hypothesis
- Case Study VI Special relativity
- Case Study VII General relativity and cosmology
- Index
Summary
Introduction
On the very day when I formulated this law, I began to devote myself to the task of investing it with a true physical meaning. This quest automatically led me to study the interrelation of entropy and probability – in other words, to pursue the line of thought inaugurated by Boltzmann.
Planck recognised that, in order to give his expression (12.41) for the spectrum of blackbody radiation physical meaning, the way forward involved adopting a point of view which he had rejected in essentially all his previous work. As is apparent from his words quoted at the end of Chapter 12, Planck was working at white-hot intensity, because he was not a specialist in statistical physics. We will find that his analysis did not, in fact, follow the precepts of classical statistical mechanics. Despite the basic flaws in his argument, he discovered the essential role which quantisation plays in accounting for the expression (12.41) – recall that Planck's derivation of October 1900 was essentially a thermodynamic argument.
We have already discussed Boltzmann's expression for the relation between entropy and probability, S ∝ ln W, in Sections 10.7 and 10.8. The constant of proportionality was not known at the time and so we write S = C ln W, where C is some unknown universal constant. First of all, let us describe how Planck should have proceeded, according to classical statistical mechanics.
Boltzmann's procedure in statistical mechanics
Planck knew that he had to work out the average energy Ē of an oscillator in thermal equilibrium in an enclosure at temperature T.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Theoretical Concepts in PhysicsAn Alternative View of Theoretical Reasoning in Physics, pp. 329 - 344Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2003