Abbott, Andrew. 1988. ‘Transcending General Linear Reality’. Sociological Theory 6 (2): 169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler, Emanuel. 1991. ‘Cognitive Evolution: A Dynamic Approach for the Study of International Relations and Their Progress’. In Progress in Postwar International Relations. Edited by Adler, Emanuel and Crawford, Beverly, 43–88. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Albert, Mathias. 1996. Fallen der (Welt-)Ordnung. Internationale Beziehungen und ihre Theorien zwischen Moderne und Postmoderne. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar

Albert, Mathias. 2002. Zur Politik der Weltgesellschaft: Identität und Recht im Kontext internationaler Vergesellschaftung. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.Google Scholar

Albert, Mathias. 2004. ‘Introduction’. In Observing International Relations: Niklas Luhmann and World Politics. Edited by Albert, Mathias and Hilkermeier, Lena, 1–11. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albert, Mathias. 2007. ‘“Globalization Theory”: Yesterday’s Fad or More Lively than Ever?’ International Political Sociology 1 (2): 165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albert, Mathias. 2008. ‘Conflict in World Society Theory’. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory no. 17: 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albert, Mathias. 2014. ‘World State: Brunkhorst’s “Cosmopolitan State” and Varieties of Differentiation’. Social and Legal Studies 23 (4): 533–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albert, Mathias. 2015a. ‘Neu bleibt alt: Außenpolitik, Weltpolitik und das Gleichgewicht der Mächte’. Zeitschrift für Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik 8 (1): 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albert, Mathias. 2015b. ‘The Polar Regions in the System of World Politics: Social Differentiation and Securitization’. Geogprahische Zeitschrift 103 (4): 217–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albert, Mathias, and Brock, Lothar. 1996. ‘Debordering the World of States: New Spaces in International Relations’. New Political Science 35 (1): 69–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albert, Mathias, Brock, Lothar, and Wolf, Klaus D., eds. 2000. Civilizing World Politics: Society and Community Beyond the State. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Albert, Mathias, and Buzan, Barry. 2011. ‘Securitization, Sectors and Functional Differentiation’. Security Dialogue 42 (4–5): 413–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albert, Mathias, and Buzan, Barry. 2013. ‘International Relations Theory and the “Social Whole”: Encounters and Gaps between IR and Sociology’. International Political Sociology 7 (2): 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albert, Mathias, Buzan, Barry, and Zürn, Michael, eds. 2013. Bringing Sociology to International Relations: World Politics as Differentiation Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albert, Mathias, and Cederman, Lars-Erik. 2010. ‘Introduction: Systems Theorizing in IR’. In New Systems Theories of World Politics. Edited by Albert, Mathias, Cederman, Lars-Erik, and Wendt, Alexander, 3–22. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Albert, Mathias, and Hilkermeier, Lena, eds. 2004. Observing International Relations: Niklas Luhmann and World Politics. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albert, Mathias, and Kessler, Oliver. 2013. ‘Die Transformation von Recht und Politik globaler Sicherheit aus der Perspektive der Systemtheorie’. In Recht und Politik globaler Sicherheit: Bestandsaufnahme und Erklärungsansätze. Edited by Fischer-Lescano, Andreas, and Mayer, Peter, 335–360. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar

Albert, Mathias, and Mahlert, Bettina. 2013. ‘Internationale Beziehungen und Soziologie. Das “Scharnier” der Differenzierung’. In Ordnung und Wandel in der Weltpolitik: Konturen einer Soziologie der internationalen Beziehungen (Leviathan, Special Issue Nr. 28). Edited by Stetter, Stephan, 59–77. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar

Albert, Mathias, and Stetter, Stephan. 2015a. ‘Embedding Regional Integration in the Fabric of a Differentiated World Society and a Differentiated World Political System’. In From Globalization to World Society: Neo-Institutional and Systems-Theoretical Perspectives. Edited by Holzer, Boris, Kastner, Fatima, and Werron, Tobias, 61–82. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Albert, Mathias, and Stetter, Stephan. 2015b. ‘Actorhood in World Politics: The Dialects of Agency/Structure within the World Polity’. In Theorizing Foreign Policy in a Globalized World. Edited by Gunther Hellmann, Gunther, and Jørgensen, Knud-Erik, 81–100. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albert, Mathias, and Walter, Jochen. 2005. ‘Die Intelligenzfunktion der Politik’. In Schlüsselwerke der Systemtheorie. Edited by Baecker, Dirk, 95–106. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar

Alexander, Jeffrey C. 1990. ‘Differentiation Theory: Problems and Prospects’. In Differentiation Theory and Social Change: Comparative and Historical Perspectives. Edited by Alexander, Jeffrey C. and Colomy, Paul, 1–15. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Allinson, Jamie C., and Anievas, Alexander. 2009. ‘The Uses and Misuses of Uneven and Combined Development: An Anatomy of a Concept’. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 22 (1): 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, James. 2007. ‘Singular Europe: An Empire Once Again?’ In Geopolitics of European Union Enlargement. The Fortress Empire. Edited by Armstrong, Warwick, and Anderson, James, 9–29. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Matthew S. 1993. The Rise of Modern Diplomacy 1450–1919. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Anghie, Antony. 2007. Imperialism, Sovereignty, and the Making of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Apel, Karl-Otto. 1973. Transformation der Philosophie (2 vols). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Archer, Margaret S. 1988. Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Aron, Raymond. 1986. Frieden und Krieg: Eine Theorie der Staatenwelt. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer [Paix et guerre entre les nations, Paris: Calmann-Lévy 1962; English translation: Peace & War: A Theory of International Relations. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 2003].Google Scholar

Ashley, Richard K. 1984. ‘The Poverty of Neorealism’. International Organization 38 (2): 225–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Axford, Barrie. 1995. The Global System: Economics, Politics, and Culture. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar

Ayers, Alison J. 2012. ‘An Illusion of the Epoch: Critiquing the Ideology of “Failed States”’. International Politics 49 (5): 568–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bailin, Alison. 2005. From Traditional to Group Hegemony: The G7, the Liberal Economic Order and the Core–Periphery Gap. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Baker, Andres. 2015. ‘American Empire – A Dangerous Distortion?’ Review of International Studies (FirstView Article, February, doi: 10.1017/S0260210510000331).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldwin, David A. 1979. ‘Power Analysis and World Politics: New Trends versus Old Tendencies’. World Politics 31 (2): 161–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ballantyne, Tony, and Burton, Antoinette. 2012. ‘Empires and the Reach of the Global’. In A World Connecting, 1870–1945. Edited by Rosenberg, Emily S., 285–431. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bang, Henrik P., ed. 2003. Governance as Social and Political Communication. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Barnett, Michael N., and Duvall, Raymond. 2006. Power in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bartelson, Jens. 1995. A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartelson, Jens. 2001. The Critique of the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartelson, Jens. 2009. Visions of World Community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumgart, Winfried. 1999. Europäisches Konzert und nationale Bewegung: Internationale Beziehungen, 1830–1878. Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar

Bayly, Christopher A. 2004. The Birth of the Modern World, 1780–1914: Global Connections and Comparisons. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Beck, Ulrich. 1997. Was ist Globalisierung? Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Bell, Duncan. 2007a. The Idea of Greater Britain: Empire and the Future of World Order, 1860–1900. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, Duncan. 2007b. ‘The Victorian Idea of a Global State’. In Victorian Visions of Global Order: Empire and International Relations in Nineteenth-Century Political Thought. Edited by Bell, Duncan, 159–185. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bentley, Jerry H. 1996. ‘Cross-Cultural Interaction and Periodization in World History’. American Historical Review 101 (3): 749–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benton, Lauren A. 2010. A Search for Sovereignty: Law and Geography in European Empires, 1400–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Berg, Maxine. 2012. Writing the History of the Global: Challenges for the Twenty-First Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bermes, Christian. 2004. Welt als Thema der Philosophie: Vom metaphysischen zum natürlichen Weltbegriff. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bilgin, Pinar, and Morton, Adam D.. 2002. ‘Historicising Representations of “Failed States”: Beyond the Cold-War Annexation of the Social Sciences?’ Third World Quarterly 23 (1): 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, Jeremy. 2002. Europe and the World, 1650–1830. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Black, Jeremy. 2008. Great Powers and the Quest for Hegemony: The World Order since 1500. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Black, Jeremy. 2010. A History of Diplomacy. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar

Blanco, Luis F. 2010. ‘World Politics vs. International Politics: Has One of These Expressions Overcome the Other?’. Bielefeld (internal research report).Google Scholar

Blum, Andrew. 2012. Tubes: A Journey to the Center of the Internet. New York: Ecco.Google Scholar

Blumer, Herbert. 1986. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Börzel, Tanja A. 2012. ‘How Much Statehood Does It Take – And What For?’ SFB-Governance Working Paper Series 29. Berlin.Google Scholar

Bosbach, Franz, and Davis, John R., eds. 2002. Die Weltausstellung von 1851 und ihre Folgen. Munich: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Branch, Jordan. 2012. ‘“Colonial Reflection” and Territoriality: The Peripheral Origins of Sovereign Statehood’. European Journal of International Relations 18 (2): 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braun, Hermann. 1992. ‘Welt.’ In Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, Vol. 7. Edited by Brunner, Otto, Conze, Werner, and Koselleck, Reinhart, 433–510. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar

Bright, Charles, and Geyer, Michael. 2007. ‘Globalgeschichte und die Einheit der Welt im 20. Jahrhundert’. In Globalgeschichte. Theorien, Ansätze, Themen. Edited by Conrad, Sebastian, Eckert, Andreas, and Freitag, Ulrike, 53–80. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar

Brock, Lothar, Holm, Hans-Henrik, Sørensen, Georg, and Stohl, Michael. 2012. Fragile States: Violence and the Failure of Intervention. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Brooks, Rosa Ehrenreich. 2005. ‘Failed States, or the State as Failure?’ The University of Chicago Law Review 72 (4): 1159–1196.Google Scholar

Brougham, and Vaux, , Henry Brougham, Baron. 1803. An Inquiry into the Colonial Policy of the European Powers, Vol. 2. Edinburgh: E. Balfour.Google Scholar

Brunkhorst, Hauke. 2002. Solidarität: Von der Bürgerfreundschaft zur globalen Rechtsgenossenschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Brunkhorst, Hauke. 2009a. ‘There Will Be Blood: Konstitutionalisierung ohne Demokratie’. In Demokratie in der Weltgesellschaft (Soziale Welt, Special Issue Nr. 18). Edited by Brunkhorst, Hauke, 99–123. Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brunkhorst, Hauke. 2009b. ‘Vorwort.’ In Demokratie in der Weltgesellschaft (Soziale Welt, Special Issue no. 18). Edited by Brunkhorst, Hauke, 9–14. Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brunkhorst, Hauke. 2012. ‘The Co-evolution of Cosmopolitan and National Statehood – Preliminary Theoretical Considerations on the Historical Evolution of Constitutionalism’. Cooperation and Conflict 47 (2): 176–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brunkhorst, Hauke. 2014. Critical Theory of Legal Revolutions: Evolutionary Perspectives. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar

Bukovansky, Mlada, Clark, Ian, Eckersley, Robyn, Price, Richard M., Reus-Smit, Christian, and Wheeler, Nicholas J.. 2012. Special Responsibilities: Global Problems and American Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bull, Hedley, and Watson, Adam, eds. 1984. The Expansion of International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Bull, Hedley N. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bunge, Mario. 2004. ‘How Does It Work? The Search for Explanatory Mechanisms’. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (2): 182–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burton, John W. 1972. World Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butterfield, Herbert, and Wight, Martin, eds. 1966. Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry. 2001. ‘The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR’. Review of International Studies 27 (3): 471–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzan, Barry. 2004a. From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzan, Barry. 2004b. The United States and the Great Powers: World Politics in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry, and Albert, Mathias. 2010. ‘Differentiation: A Sociological Approach to International Relations Theory’. European Journal of International Relations 16 (3): 315–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzan, Barry, and Lawson, George. 2013. ‘The Global Transformation: The Nineteenth Century and the Making of Modern International Relations’. International Studies Quarterly 57 (3): 620–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzan, Barry, and Lawson, George. 2014. ‘Rethinking Benchmark Dates in International Relations’. European Journal of International Relations 20 (2): 437–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzan, Barry, and Lawson, George. 2015. The Global Transformation. History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzan, Barry, and Little, Richard. 1999. ‘Beyond Westphalia? Capitalism after the “Fall”’. Review of International Studies 25 (5): 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzan, Barry, and Little, Richard. 2000. International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Calhoun, Craig. 1993. ‘Nationalism and Ethnicity’. Annual Review of Sociology 19: 211–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Call, Charles T. 2011. ‘Beyond the “Failed State”: Toward Conceptual Alternatives’. European Journal of International Relations 17 (2): 303–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cerny, Philip G. 2009. ‘Neoliberalisation and Place: Deconstructing and Reconstructing Borders’. In The Disoriented State: Shifts in Governmentality, Territoriality and Governance. Edited by Arts, Bas, van Houtum, Henk, and Lagendijk, Arnoud, 13–40. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2000. Provincializing Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Chase-Dunn, Christopher, and Inoue, Hiroko. 2012. ‘Accelerating Democratic Global State Formation’. Cooperation and Conflict 47 (2): 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Ian. 1989. The Hierarchy of States: Reform and Resistance in the International Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Ian. 2011. Hegemony in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Claude, Inis L. 1969. Power and International Relations. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Cohen, Raymond. 1987. Theatre of Power: The Art of Diplomatic Signalling. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Conrad, Sebastian, Eckert, Andreas, and Freitag, Ulrike, eds. 2007. Globalgeschichte. Theorien, Ansätze, Themen. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar

Conrad, Sebastian, and Sachsenmaier, Dominic. 2007. ‘Introduction: Competing Visions of World Order: Global Moments and Movements, 1880s–1930s’. In Competing Visions of World Order: Global Moments and Movements, 1880s–1930s. Edited by Conrad, Sebastian and Sachsenmaier, Dominic, 1–25. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conze, Eckart. 2004. ‘Abschied vom Staat und Politik? Überlegungen zur Geschichte der internationalen Politik’. In Geschichte der internationalen Beziehungen: Erneuerung und Erweiterung einer historischen Disziplin. Edited by Conze, Eckart, Lappenküper, Ulrich, and Müller, Guido, 15–43. Köln: Böhlau.Google Scholar

Conze, Eckart. 2007. ‘Jenseits von Männern und Mächten. Geschichte der internationalen Politik als Systemgeschichte’. In Geschichte der Politik: Alte und neue Wege. Edited by Kraus, Hans-Christof and Nicklas, Thomas, 41–64. Munich: R. Oldenbourg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, Andrew. 2010. ‘The G20 as an Improvised Crisis Committee and/or a Contested Steering Committee for the World’. International Affairs 86 (3): 741–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Robert W. 1981. ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’. Millennium – Journal of International Studies 10 (2): 126–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craven, Matthew. 2012. ‘The Invention of a Tradition: Westlake, the Berlin Conference and the Historicisation of International Law’. In Constructing International Law: The Birth of a Discipline. Edited by Nuzzo, Luigi and Vec, Milos, 363–402. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar

Czempiel, Ernst-Otto. 1991. Weltpolitik im Umbruch: Das internationale System nach dem Ende des Ost-West-Konflikts. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar

Dagorn, René-Éric. 2008. ‘“Mondialisation”, un mot qui change les mondes’. In L’invention du monde. Une géographie de la mondialisation. Edited by Lévy, Jacques, 63–78. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar

Darwin, John. 2008. After Tamerlane: The Rise and Fall of Global Empires, 1400–2000. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Daugherty, William H. 1993. ‘System Management and the Endurance of the Concert of Europe’. In Coping with Complexity in the International System. Edited by Snyder, Jack and Jervis, Robert, 71–105. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

De Wet, Erika. 2006. ‘The International Constitutional Order’. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 55 (1): 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dehio, Ludwig. 1948. Gleichgewicht oder Hegemonie. Betrachtungen über ein Grundproblem der neueren Staatengeschichte. Krefeld: Scherpe.Google Scholar

Der Derian, James. 1987. On Diplomacy: A Genealogy of Western Estrangement. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Deutsch, Karl W. 1953. Nationalism and Social Communication: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Nationality. Boston, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Deutsch, Karl W. 1963. The Nerves of Government: Models of Political Communication and Control. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Deutsch, Karl W. 1977. Problems of World Modeling: Political and Social Implications. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar

Dickmann, Fritz. 1972. Der Westfälische Frieden. 3rd ed. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar

Doering-Manteuffel, Anselm. 1991. Vom Wiener Kongress zur Pariser Konferenz: England, die deutsche Frage und das Mächtesystem, 1815–1856. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar

Donnelly, Jack. 2009. ‘Rethinking Political Structures: From “Ordering Principles” to “Vertical Differentiation” – and Beyond’. International Theory 1 (1): 49–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donnelly, Jack. 2012. ‘The Differentiation of International Societies: An Approach to Structural International Theory’. European Journal of International Relations 18 (1): 151–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donnelly, Jack. 2013. ‘Differentiation: Type and Dimension Approaches’. In Bringing Sociology to International Relations: World Politics as Differentiation Theory. Edited by Albert, Mathias, Buzan, Barry, and Zürn, Michael, 91–111. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duchhardt, Heinz. 1976. Gleichgewicht der Kräfte, Convenance, europäisches Konzert. Friedenskongresse und Friedensschlüsse vom Zeitalter Ludwigs XIV. bis zum Wiener Kongress. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Duchhardt, Heinz. 1997. Balance of Power und Pentarchie: internationale Beziehungen 1700–1785. Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar

Duchhardt, Heinz. 1999. ‘“Westphalian System”. Zur Problematik einer Denkfigur’. Historische Zeitschrift 269 (2): 305–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunne, Tim. 1998. Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. Basingstoke: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunne, Tim, Hansen, Lene, and Wight, Colin. 2013. ‘The End of International Relations Theory?’ European Journal of International Relations 19 (3): 405–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durkheim, Émile. 1933. The Division of Labor in Society. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar

Dyroff, Hans-Dieter. 1966. Der Wiener Kongress 1814/15: Die Neuordnung Europas. Munich: dtv.Google Scholar

Easton, David. 1965. A Framework for Political Analysis. Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Easton, David. 1979. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. 1986. The Origins and Diversity of Axial Age Civilizations. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. 2000. ‘Multiple Modernities’. Daedalus 129: 1–29.Google Scholar

Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. 2001. ‘Reconceptionalizations of the Global: Borderlines in World Society’. Proto Sociology – An International Journal and Interdisciplinary Project 15: 14–25.Google Scholar

Elias, Norbert. 2009. The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Emirbayer, Mustafa. 1997. ‘Manifesto for a Relational Sociology’. The American Journal of Sociology 103 (2): 281–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Enroth, Henrik. 2014. ‘Governance: The Art of Governing after Governmentality’. European Journal of Social Theory 17 (1): 60–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erbe, Michael. 2004. Revolutionäre Erschütterung und erneuertes Gleichgewicht: Internationale Beziehungen, 1785–1830. Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar

Erman, Wilhelm. 1919. Weltbibliographie und Einheitskatalog. Bonn: Kurt Schroeder Verlag.Google Scholar

Fabry, Mikulas. 2010. Recognizing States: International Society and the Establishment of New States since 1776. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fassbender, Bardo. 1998. ‘The United Nations Charter as Constitution of the International Community’. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 36 (3): 529–619.Google Scholar

Fassbender, Bardo, and Peters, Anne, eds. 2012. The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fawn, Rick. 2009. ‘“Regions” and Their Study: Wherefrom, What for and Where to?’ Review of International Studies 35 (S1): 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fenske, Hans. 1975. ‘Gleichgewicht, Balance’. In Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, Vol. 2. Edited by Brunner, Otto, Conze, Werner, and Koselleck, Reinhart, 959–996. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar

Finer, S. E. 1997. The History of Government from the Earliest Times. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fischer, Martina, and Schmelzle, Beatrix, eds. 2009. Building Peace in the Absence of States: Challenging the Discourse on State Failure. Berlin: Berghof Research Center.Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, Andreas. 2005. Globalverfassung: Die Geltungsbegründung der Menschenrechte. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, Andreas, and Teubner, Gunther. 2004. ‘Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law’. Michigan Journal of International Law 25 (4): 999–1046.Google Scholar

Fitzi, Gregor. 2015. Grenzen des Konsenses. Rekonstruktion einer Theorie ‘transnormativer Vergesellschaftung’. Weilerswist: Velbrück.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 2006. Geschichte der Gouvernementalität (2 vols). Edited by Sennelart, Michel. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp [Sécurité, territoire, population (Cours au Collège de France, 1977–1978), Paris: Gallimard, 2004; and: Naissance de la biopolitique (Cours au Collège de France, 1978–1979), Paris: Gallimard, 2004, English translations: Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the College de France 1977–1978. London: Picador, 2009; and: The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France, 1978–1979. London: Picador, 2010.Google Scholar

Fox, William T. R. 1944. The Super-Powers: The United States, Britain, and the Soviet Union – Their Responsibility for Peace. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar

Frank, Manfred. 1984. Was ist Neostrukturalismus? Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Frantz, Constantin. (1859) 1968. Untersuchungen über das Europäische Gleichgewicht. Reprint of the Original Edition 1859. Osnabrück: Biblio-Verlag.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, Francis. 2011. The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Füllsack, Manfred. 1998. ‘Geltungsansprüche und Beobachtung zweiter Ordnung: Wie nahe kommen sich Diskurs- und Systemtheorie?’ Soziale Systeme 4 (1): 185–198.Google Scholar

Gamble, Andrew, and Payne, Anthony, eds. 1996. Regionalism and World Order. London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geppert, Alexander C. T. 2010. Fleeting Cities: Imperial Expositions in Fin-de-Siècle Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glanville, Luke. 2013. ‘The Myth of “Traditional” Sovereignty’. International Studies Quarterly 57 (1): 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Göbel, Andreas. 2003. ‘Die Welt der Systemtheorie: Überlegungen mit Rücksicht auf Gehlen, Husserl und Blumenberg’. Paper presented at the Conference ‘Weltbegriffe und soziologische Theorie’, 27–29 November. Bielefeld.Google Scholar

Gollwitzer, Heinz. 1972. Geschichte des weltpolitischen Denkens. Band 1: Vom Zeitalter der Entdeckungen bis zum Beginn des Imperialismus. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar

Gollwitzer, Heinz. 1982. Geschichte des weltpolitischen Denkens. Band 2: Zeitalter des Imperialismus und der Weltkriege. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar

Gorman, Daniel. 2012. The Emergence of International Society in the 1920s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gosch, Stephen S., and Stearns, Peter N.. 2008. Premodern Travel in World History. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Grandner, Margarete, Rothermund, Dietmar, and Schwentker, Wolfgang, eds. 2005. Globalisierung und Globalgeschichte. Wien: Mandelbaum Verlag.Google Scholar

Grataloup, Christian. 2009. L’invention des continents: Comment l’Europe a découpé le Monde. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar

Greve, Jens, and Heintz, Bettina. 2005. ‘Die “Entdeckung” der Weltgesellschaft. Entstehung und Grenzen der Weltgesellschaftstheorie’. In Weltgesellschaft: Theoretische Zugänge und empirische Problemlagen (Zeitschrift für Soziologie, Special Issue, 34/2005). Edited by Heintz, Bettina, Münch, Richard, and Tyrell, Hartmann, 89–119. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Groh, Dieter. 1988. ‘Rußland als Weltmacht: Eine begriffsgeschichtliche Studie (1966)’. In Russland im Blick Europas: 300 Jahre historische Perspektiven. Edited by Groh, Dieter, 399–413. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Gruber, Richard G. 1919. Internationale Staatenkongresse und Konferenzen: Ihre Vorbereitung und Organisation. Berlin: Puttlammer & Mühlbrecht.Google Scholar

Gruner, Wolf D. 1992. ‘Was There a Reformed Balance of Power System or Cooperative Power Hegemony?’ The American Historical Review 97 (3): 725–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gruner, Wolf D. 2014. Der Wiener Kongress 1814/15. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar

Haas, Ernst B. 1953. ‘The Balance of Power: Prescription, Concept, or Propaganda’. World Politics 5 (4): 442–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1988. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns (2 vols). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp [Theory of Communicative Action, 2 vols., translated by McCarthy, Thomas A.. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1987].Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 2014. ‘Hauke Brunkhorst’s Critical Theory of Legal Revolutions: Some Comments on Theory Construction’. Social & Legal Studies 23 (4): 533–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, and Luhmann, Niklas. 1972. Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie: Was leistet die Systemforschung? Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Haferkamp, Hans, and Smelser, Neil J., eds. 1992. Social Change and Modernity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Haldén, Peter. 2011. Stability without Statehood: Lessons from Europe’s History before the Sovereign State. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haldén, Peter. 2013. ‘Republican Continuities in the Vienna Order and the German Confederation 1815–1866’. European Journal of International Relations 19 (2): 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halfwassen, Jens. 2004. ‘Metaphysik als Denken des Ganzen und des Einen im antiken Platonismus und im deutschen Idealismus’. In Weltbilder. Edited by Gebhardt, Hans and Kiesel, Helmuth, 263–283. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haltern, Utz. 1971. Die Londoner Weltausstellung von 1851. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der bürgerlich-industriellen Gesellschaft im 19. Jahrhundert. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar

Hameiri, Shahar. 2013. ‘Theorising Regions through Changes in Statehood: Rethinking the Theory and Method of Comparative Regionalism’. Review of International Studies 39 (2): 313–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardt, Michael, and Negri, Antonio. 2000. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Harrison, Neil E., ed. 2006. Complexity in World Politics: Concepts and Methods of a New Paradigm. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Headrick, Daniel R. 2000. When Information Came of Age: Technologies of Knowledge in the Age of Reason and Revolution, 1700–1850. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Heeren, Arnold H. L. 1811. Handbuch der Geschichte des europäischen Staatensystems und seiner Colonien: Von der Entdeckung beyder Indien bis zur Errichtung des französischen Kayserthrons. 2nd ed. Göttingen: J.F. Röwer.Google Scholar

Heimann, Gadi. 2015. ‘What Does it Take to Be a Great Power? The Story of France Joining the Big Five’. Review of International Studies 41 (1): 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heintz, Bettina. 2010. ‘Numerische Differenz. Überlegungen zu einer Soziologie des (quantitativen) Vergleichs’. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 39 (3): 162–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heintz, Bettina, and Tyrell, Hartmann, 2015. Interaktion – Organisation – Gesellschaft revisited. Anwendungen, Erweiterungen, Alternativen (Zeitschrift für Soziologie Special Issue). Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heintz, Peter. 1982. Die Weltgesellschaft im Spiegel von Ereignissen. Diessenhofen: Rüegger.Google Scholar

Herkenrath, Mark, König, Claudia, Scholtz, Hanno, and Volken, Thomas. 2005. ‘Convergence and Divergence in the Contemporary World System. An Introduction’. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 46 (5–6): 363–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herren, Madeleine. 2009. Internationale Organisationen seit 1865: Eine Globalgeschichte der internationalen Ordnung. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Hettne, Björn, Inotai, András, and Sunkel, Osvaldo, eds. 1999. Globalism and the New Regionalism. New York: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hobden, Stephen. 1999. ‘Theorising the International System: Perspectives from Historical Sociology’. Review of International Studies 25 (2): 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hobden, Stephen, and Hobson, John M., eds. 2002. Historical Sociology of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hobsbawm, Eric J. 1987. The Age of Empire, 1875–1914. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar

Hobson, John M. 2002. ‘What’s at Stake in “Bringing Historical Sociology Back into International Relations”? Transcending “Chronofetishism” and “Tempocentrism” in International Relations’. In Historical Sociology of International Relations. Edited by Hobden, Stephen and Hobson, John M., 3–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hobson, John M. 2012. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hobson, John M., and Hobden, Stephen. 2002. ‘On the Road towards an Historicised World Sociology’. In Historical Sociology of International Relations. Edited by Hobden, Stephen and Hobson, John M., 265–285. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hobson, John M., and Sharman, Jason G.. 2005. ‘The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics of Hierarchy and Political Change’. European Journal of International Relations 11 (1): 63–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Höffe, Otfried. 2002. Demokratie im Zeitalter der Globalisierung. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar

Holzer, Boris, Kastner, Fatima, and Werron, Tobias, eds. 2015. From Globalization to World Society: Neo-Institutional and Systems-Theoretical Perspectives. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Hondrich, Karl-Otto. 1992. ‘World Society versus Niche Societies. Paradoxes of Unidirectional Evolution’. In Social Change and Modernity. Edited by Haferkamp, Hans and Smelser, Neil J., 350–366. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Hopkins, Anthony G., ed. 2002. Globalization in World History. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Hopkins, Anthony G., ed. 2006. Global History. Interactions between the Universal and the Local. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howe, Stephen. 2010. The New Imperial Histories Reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. 1970. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Translated, with an introduction, by Carr, David. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press [Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie: Edited by Walter Biemel. 2nd ed. Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, 1962].Google Scholar

Jackson, Robert, and Rosberg, Carl. 1982. ‘Why Africa’s Weak States Persist: The Empirical and the Juridical in Statehood’. World Politics 35 (1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jäger, Hans-Martin. 2004. ‘“World Opinion” and the Turn to Post-Sovereign International Governance’. In Observing International Relations: Niklas Luhmann and World Politics. Edited by Albert, Mathias and Hilkermeier, Lena, 142–156. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

James, Alan. 1993. ‘System or Society?’ Review of International Studies 19 (3): 269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Japp, Klaus P. 2007. ‘Regionen und Differenzierung’. Soziale Systeme 13 (1+2): 185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarrett, Mark. 2014. The Congress of Vienna and Its Legacy. War and Great Power Diplomacy after Napoleon. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar

Jaspers, Karl. 2010. The Origin and Goal of History. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Jessop, Bob. 2003. ‘Governance and Meta-Governance: On Reflexivity, Requisite Variety and Requisite Irony’. In Governance as Social and Political Communication. Edited by Bang, Henrik P., 101–116. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Jordheim, Helge, and Neumann, Iver B.. 2011. ‘Empire, Imperialism and Conceptual History’. Journal of International Relations and Development 14 (2): 153–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaeber, Ernst. 1907. Die Idee des europäischen Gleichgewichts in der publizistischen Literatur vom 16. bis zur Mitte des 18. Jahrhunderts. Berlin: Verlag von Alexander Duncker.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 2008. Zum ewigen Frieden und andere Schriften. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag [Perpetual Peace, and Other Essays on Politics, History, and Morals. Translated, with introduction, by Ted Humphrey. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1983].Google Scholar

Kaplan, Morton A. 1957. System and Process in International Politics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Kavan, Zdenek. 1982. ‘Human Rights and International Community’. In The Community of States: A Study in International Political Theory. Edited by Mayall, James, 128–139. Boston, MA: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Keene, Edward. 2002. Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keene, Edward. 2009. ‘International Society as an Ideal Type’. In Theorising International Society: English School Methods. Edited by Navari, Cornelia, 104–124. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keene, Edward. 2012. ‘The Treaty-Making Revolution of the Nineteenth Century’. The International History Review 34 (3): 475–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keene, Edward. 2013. ‘The Naming of Powers’. Cooperation and Conflict 48 (2): 268–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, David. 1996. ‘International Law and the Nineteenth Century: History of an Illusion’. Nordic Journal of International Law 65 (3): 385–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kießling, Friedrich. 2012. ‘(Welt-)Öffentlichkeit’. In Dimensionen internationaler Geschichte. Edited by Dülffer, Jost and Loth, Wilfried, 85–105. Munich: Oldenbourg Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kienast, Walther. 1936. Die Anfänge des europäischen Staatensystems im späteren Mittelalter. Munich: Oldenbourg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kissinger, Henry. 1973. A World Restored: Metternich, Castlereagh, and the Problems of Peace, 1812–22. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Klüber, Johann L. 1966 (orig. 1816). Übersicht der diplomatischen Verhandlungen des Wiener Kongresses überhaupt und insbesonderheit über wichtige Angelegenheiten des teutschen Bundes. Osnabrück: Otto Zeller.Google Scholar

Klueting, Harm. 1986. Die Lehre von der Macht der Staaten: Das außenpolitische Machtproblem in der ‘politischen Wissenschaft’ und in der praktischen Politik im 18. Jahrhundert. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knapp, Gottfried. 2010. ‘Architekturgeschichte – das war einmal’. Süddeutsche Zeitung 66 (255): 11.Google Scholar

Knorr, Klaus, and Verba, Sidney, eds. 1961. The International System. Theoretical Essays. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Knorr Cetina, Karin. 2005. ‘Complex Global Microstructures: The New Terrorist Societies’. Theory, Culture & Society 22 (5): 213–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koch, Martin. 2009. ‘Autonomization of IGOs’. International Political Sociology 3 (4): 431–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koch, Martin. 2014. ‘Weltorganisationen. Ein (Re-)Konzeptualisierungsvorschlag für internationale Organisationen’. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 21 (1): 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Köhler, Oskar. 1955. ‘Was ist “Welt” in der Geschichte?’ Saeculum 6: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koschorke, Albrecht. 2012. Wahrheit und Erfindung: Grundzüge einer Allgemeinen Erzähltheorie. 2nd ed. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer.Google Scholar

Koselleck, Reinhart. 1992. ‘Einleitung’. In Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, Vol. 1. Edited by Brunner, Otto, Conze, Werner, and Koselleck, Reinhart, XIII–XXVII. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti. 2011. ‘Histories of International Law: Dealing with Eurocentrism’. Rechtsgeschichte. Zeitschrift des Max-Planck-Instituts für europäische Rechtsgeschichte 19: 152–176.Google Scholar

Krajewski, Markus. 2006. Restlosigkeit: Weltprojekte um 1900. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag.Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen D., and Risse, Thomas. 2014. ‘External Actors, State-Building, and Service Provision in Areas of Limited Statehood’. Governance 27 (4): 545–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krasny, Elke. 1996. ‘Zukunft ohne Ende – das Unternehmen Weltausstellung’. In Wunschmaschine Welterfindung: Eine Geschichte der Technikvisionen seit dem 18. Jahrhundert (ein Katalogbuch zur gleichnamigen Ausstellung). Edited by Felderer, Brigitte, 314–338. Wien: Springer.Google Scholar

Kratochwil, Friedrich. 1986. ‘Of Systems, Boundaries, and Territoriality: An Inquiry into the Formation of the State System’. World Politics 39 (1): 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kretschmer, Winfried. 1999. Geschichte der Weltausstellungen. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar

Krüger, Peter. 1999. ‘Mythen des europäischen Staatensystems: Gleichgewicht, europäisches Konzert, Integration’. Zeitschrift für Religions- und Geistesgeschichte 51 (2): 100–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kumar, Krishan. 2010. ‘Nation-States as Empires, Empires as Nation-States: Two Principles, One Practice?’ Theory and Society 39 (2): 119–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuntz, Friederike 2015. Aporias: The International Relation, Interrelated Sovereigns, the Human Individual, and Power-Knowledge. PhD dissertation, Bielefeld: Bielefeld University.Google Scholar

Lake, David A. 2009. Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Lake, David A. 2012. ‘Great Power Hierarchies and Strategies in Twenty-First Century World Politics’. In Handbook of International Relations: Second Edition. Edited by Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A., 555–577. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Larson, Deborah Welch, Paul, T.V., and Wohlforth, William C.. 2014. ‘Status and World Order’. In Status in World Politics. Edited by Paul, T.V., Larson, Deborah Welch, and Wohlforth, William C., 3–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laursen, Finn. 2004. ‘International Regimes or Would-be Polities? Some Concluding Questions and Remarks’. In Comparative Regional Integration: Theoretical Perspectives. Edited by Laursen, Finn, 283–293. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Lazier, Benjamin. 2011. ‘Earthrise; or, the Globalization of the World Picture’. The American Historical Review 116 (3): 602–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lefebvre, Henri. 1991. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lewis, Martin W., and Wigen, Kären E.. 1997. The Myth of Continents: A Critique of Metageography. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Linklater, Andrew, and Suganami, Hidemi. 2006. The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Little, Richard. 2005. ‘The English School and World History’. In International Society and its Critics. Edited by Bellamy, Alex J., 45–63. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Little, Richard. 2007. The Balance of Power in International Relations: Metaphors, Myths, and Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Little, Richard. 2009. ‘History, Theory and Methodological Pluralism in the English School’. In Theorising International Society: English School Methods. Edited by Navari, Cornelia, 78–103. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Little, Richard. 2013. ‘Conclusion: Eurocentrism, World History, Meta-Narratives and the Meeting of International Societies’. In International Orders in the Early Modern World: Before the Rise of the West. Edited by Quirk, Joel, Suzuki, Shogo, and Zhang, Yongjin, 159–180. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lorca, Arnulf B. 2010. ‘Universal International Law: Nineteenth-Century Histories of Imposition and Appropriation’. Harvard International Law Journal 51 (2): 475–552.Google Scholar

Luard, David E. T. 1976. Types of International Society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. 1971. ‘Die Weltgesellschaft’. Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 57 (1): 1–35.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. 1980. ‘Talcott Parsons – Zur Zukunft eines Theorieprogramms’. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 9 (1): 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. 1988. ‘Warum AGIL?’ Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 40 (1): 307–324.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. 1990. ‘The Paradox of System Differentiation and the Evolution of Society’. In Differentiation Theory and Social Change: Comparative and Historical Perspectives. Edited by Alexander, Jeffrey C. and Colomy, Paul, 409–440. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. 1992. Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. 1993. Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik: Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. 1994. Die Wirtschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. 1995. Social Systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. 1997. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft (2 vols). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp [Theory of Society (2 vols.). Translated by Barrett, Rhodes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2012 (vol. 1) and 2013 (vol. 2)].Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. 2000a. Die Politik der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. 2000b. Art as a Social System. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. 2005. Soziologische Aufklärung. 3rd ed. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. 2008. Law as a Social System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mackinder, Halford J. 1904. ‘The Geographical Pivot of History’. The Geographical Journal 23 (4): 421–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mahlert, Bettina. 2005. ‘Globale Ordnung und globaler Konflikt: Talcott Parsons als Theoretiker des Ost-West-Konfliktes. Eine Anmerkung zur Theoriegeschichte von “Weltgesellschaft”’. In Weltgesellschaft: Theoretische Zugänge und empirische Problemlagen (Zeitschrift für Soziologie, Special Issue, 34/2005). Edited by Heintz, Bettina, Münch, Richard, and Tyrell, Hartmann, 159–174. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mahlert, Bettina. 2012. Der Sinn von Reichtum in der Gesellschaft. Globale Ungleichheit in soziologischer Perspektive. PhD dissertation, Bielefeld: Universität Bielefeld.Google Scholar

Maier, Charles S. 2005. ‘Was bedeutet “Welt” in einer zeitgenössischen Weltgeschichte’. In Droysen Vorlesungen. Universitätsreden am Historischen Institut der Universität Jena. Edited by Niethammer, Lutz, 133–154. Jena: Universität Jena.Google Scholar

Mann, Michael. 2012a. The Sources of Social Power, Vol 1: A History of Power from the Beginning to AD 1760. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mann, Michael. 2012b. The Sources of Social Power, Vol 3: Global Empires and Revolution, 1890–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Manners, Ian. 2002. ‘Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?’ Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2): 235–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansfield, Edward D., and Pevehouse, Jon C.. 2006. ‘Democratization and International Organizations’. International Organization 60 (1): 137–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mathisen, Trygve. 1959. Methodology in the Study of International Relations. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

Mayall, James. 1990. Nationalism and International Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mazlish, Bruce, and Buultjens, Ralph, eds. 1993. Conceptualizing Global History. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Mazower, Mark. 2012. Governing the World: The History of an Idea. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar

McNeill, William H. 1986. Polyethnicity and National Unity in World History: The Donald G. Creighton Lectures, 1985. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mead, George H. 1992. Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Reprint. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Mearsheimer, John J., and Walt, Stephen M.. 2013. ‘Leaving Theory Behind: Why Simplistic Hypothesis Testing is Bad for International Relations’. European Journal of International Relations 19 (3): 427–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merritt, Richard L., and Zinnes, Dina A.. 1988. ‘Validity of Power Indices’. International Interactions 14 (2): 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyer, John W., Boli, John, Thomas, George M., and Ramirez, Francisco O.. 1997. ‘World Society and the Nation-State’. American Journal of Sociology 103 (1): 144–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitzen, Jennifer. 2013. Power in Concert. The Nineteenth-Century Origins of Global Governance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Modelski, George. 1972. Principles of World Politics. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Modelski, George, Devezas, Tessaleno C., and Thompson, William R., eds. 2008. Globalization as Evolutionary Process: Modeling Global Change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Moore, Wilbert E. 1966. ‘Global Sociology: The World as a Singular System’. American Journal of Sociology 71 (5): 475–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgenthau, Hans J. 1955. ‘Reflections on the State of Political Science’. Review of Politics 17 (4): 431–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgenthau, Hans J., and Thompson, Kenneth W.. 1985. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. 6th ed. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar

Mösslang, Markus, and Riotte, Torsten. 2008. The Diplomats’ World: A Cultural History of Diplomacy, 1815–1914. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Müller, Harro. 1994. ‘Luhmann’s Systems Theory as a Theory of Modernity’. New German Critique (61): 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller, Thomas. 2014. ‘Global Constitutionalism in Historical Perspective: Towards Refined Tools for International Constitutional Histories’. Global Constitutionalism 3 (1): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Münkler, Herfried. 2010. ‘Staatlichkeit – eine Idee mit welthistorischer Bedeutung’. In Einsatz für den Frieden: Sicherheit und Entwicklung in Räumen begrenzter Staatlichkeit. Edited by Braml, Josef, Risse, Thomas, Sandschneider, Eberhard, and Angenendt, Steffen, 15–23. Munich: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar

Musgrave, Paul, and Nexon, Daniel H.. 2013. ‘Singularity or Aberration? A Response to Buzan and Lawson’. International Studies Quarterly 57 (3): 637–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nacke, Stefan, Unkelbach, Rene, and Werron, Tobias, eds. 2008. Weltereignisse: Theoretische und empirische Perspektiven. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar

Nagl, Dominik, and Stange, Marion. 2009. ‘Staatlichkeit und Governance im Zeitalter der europäischen Expansion. Verwaltungsstrukturen und Herrschaftsinstitutionen in den britischen und französischen Kolonialimperien’. SFB-Governance Working Paper Series 19. Berlin.Google Scholar

Nassehi, Armin. 1998. ‘Die “Welt”-Fremdheit der Globalisierungsdebatte. Ein phänomenologischer Versuch’. Soziale Welt 49 (2): 151–165.Google Scholar

Nassehi, Armin. 2004. ‘Die Theorie funktionaler Differenzierung im Horizont ihrer Kritik’. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 33 (2): 98–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, Ernest W. 1943. ‘The Origins of Modern Balance of Power Politics’. Medievalia et Humanistica 1: 124–142.Google Scholar

Nettl, John P., and Robertson, Roland. 1968. International Systems and the Modernization of Societies. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Neumann, Iver B. 2012. Diplomatic Sites: A Critical Enquiry. London: Hurst.Google Scholar

Neumann, Iver B. 2016. ‘Diplomatic Cooperation: An Evolutionary Perspective’. In Global Cooperation and the Human Factor in International Relations. Edited by Messner, Dirk and Weinlich, Silke, 225–245. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Newman, Edward. 2009. ‘Failed States and International Order: Constructing a Post-Westphalian World’. Contemporary Security Policy 30 (3): 421–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicolson, Harold. 1946. The Congress of Vienna: A Study in Allied Unity: 1812–1822. London: Constable & Co.Google Scholar

Novotny, Alexander. 1958. ‘Der Berliner Kongress und das Problem einer europäischen Politik’. Historische Zeitschrift 186 (2): 285–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ohmae, Kenichi. 1993. ‘The Rise of the Region State’. Foreign Affairs 72 (2): 78–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olberg-Haverkate, Gabriele. 2004. ‘Das “Buch von der Welt” – Entwicklung und Wandel des geschichtlichen Weltbildes im Mittelalter’. In Weltbilder. Edited by Gebhardt, Hans and Kiesel, Helmuth, 155–178. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olsen, Niklas. 2012. History in the Plural: An Introduction to the Work of Reinhart Koselleck. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar

Onuf, Nicholas G. 1979. ‘International Legal Order as an Idea’. American Journal of International Law 17 (2): 244–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Onuf, Nicholas G. 1995. ‘Levels’. European Journal of International Relations 1 (1): 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Opitz, Seven, and Tellmann, Ute. 2012. ‘Global Territories: Zones of Economic and Legal Dis/connectivity’. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 13 (3): 261–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Osiander, Andreas. 2001. ‘Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth’. International Organization 55 (2): 251–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Osterhammel, Jürgen. 2005. ‘Weltgeschichte. Ein Propädeutikum’. Geschichte in Wissenschaft und Unterricht 56 (9): 452–479.Google Scholar

Osterhammel, Jürgen. 2009. Die Verwandlung der Welt: Eine Geschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts. Munich: Beck [The Transformation of the World: A Global History of the Nineteenth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014].CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Osterhammel, Jürgen. 2012. ‘Weltordnungskonzepte’. In Dimensionen internationaler Geschichte. Edited by Dülffer, Jost and Loth, Wilfried, 409–427. Munich: Oldenbourg Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Osterhammel, Jürgen, and Jansen, Jan C.. 2012. Kolonialismus: Geschichte, Formen, Folgen. 7th ed. Munich: Beck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parker, Noel. 2010. ‘Empire as a Geopolitical Figure’. Geopolitics 15 (1): 109–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parker, Noel. ed. 2011. Empire and International Order. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Parsons, Talcott. 1967. Sociological Theory and Modern Society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Parsons, Talcott. 1968. The Structure of Social Action (2 vols). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Parsons, Talcott. 1969. Politics and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Parsons, Talcott. 1999. ‘Order and Community in the International Social System: Polarization of the World and International Order’. In The Talcott Parsons Reader. Edited by Parsons, Talcott and Turner, Bryan S., 237–269. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Parsons, Talcott, and Smelser, Neil. 1956. Economy and Society. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Passepartout, , ed. 2013. Weltnetzwerke – Weltspiele: Jules Vernes ‘In 80 Tagen um die Welt’. Konstanz: Konstanz University Press.Google Scholar

Patomäki, Heikki. 2008. The Political Economy of Global Security: War, Future Crises and Changes in Global Governance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Patomäki, Heikki. 2012. ‘The Problems of Legitimation and Potential Conflicts in a World Political Community’. Cooperation and Conflict 47 (2): 239–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paulmann, Johannes. 2000. Pomp und Politik: Monarchenbegegnungen in Europa zwischen Ancien Régime und Erstem Weltkrieg. Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar

Paulmann, Johannes. 2012. ‘Diplomatie’. In Dimensionen internationaler Geschichte. Edited by Dülffer, Jost and Loth, Wilfried, 45–64. Munich: Oldenbourg Verlag.Google Scholar

Peña, Alejandro M. 2015. ‘Governing Differentiation. On Standardisation as Political Steering’. European Journal of International Relations 21 (1): 52–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phillips, Andrew. 2011. War, Religion and Empire: The Transformation of International Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Phillips, Andrew. 2013. ‘From Global Transformation to Big Bang: A Response to Buzan and Lawson’. International Studies Quarterly 57 (3): 640–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poggi, Gianfranco. 1978. The Development of the Modern State: A Sociological Introduction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Preyer, Gerhard. 1998. Strukturelle Evolution und das Weltsystem: Theorien, Sozialstruktur und evolutionäre Entwicklungen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Pyta, Wolfram. 2009. ‘Kulturgeschichtliche Annäherungen an das europäische Mächtekonzert’. In Das europäische Mächtekonzert: Friedens- und Sicherheitspolitik vom Wiener Kongress 1815 bis zum Krimkrieg 1853. Edited by Pyta, Wolfram, 1–24. Köln: Böhlau.Google Scholar

Reus-Smit, Christian. 2011. ‘Struggles for Individual Rights and the Expansion of the International System’. International Organization 65 (2): 207–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reus-Smit, Christian. 2013. Individual Rights and the Making of the International System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reynolds, Michael A. 2011. Shattering Empires: The Clash and Collapse of the Ottoman and Russian Empires, 1908–1918. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riedel, Manfred. 1975. ‘Gesellschaft, Gemeinschaft’. In Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, Vol. 2. Edited by Brunner, Otto, Conze, Werner, and Koselleck, Reinhart, 801–862. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar

Risse, Thomas, and Lehmkuhl, Ursula. 2006. ‘Governance in Räumen begrenzter Staatlichkeit: Neue Formen des Regierens? Das Forschungsprogramm des Sonderforschungsbereichs 700 (SFB 700)’. SFB-Governance Working Paper Series 1. Berlin.Google Scholar

Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1996. ‘Exploring the Nature of the Beast: International Relations Theory and Comparative Policy Analysis Meet the European Union’. Journal of Common Market Studies 34 (1): 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, Andrew. 2014. Napoleon the Great. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar

Roberts, Ivor. 2009. Satow’s Diplomatic Practice. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robertson, Roland. 1992. Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Robertson, Roland. 2009. ‘Differentiational Reductionism and the Missing Link in Albert’s Approach to Globalization Theory’. International Political Sociology 3 (1): 119–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roeder, Philip G. 2007. Where Nation-States Come from: Institutional Change in the Age of Nationalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Roosen, William. 1980. ‘Early Modern Diplomatic Ceremonial: A Systems Approach’. The Journal of Modern History 52 (3): 452–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Root, Hilton L. 2013. Dynamics among Nations: The Evolution of Legitimacy and Development in Modern States. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenau, James N. 2007. ‘Governing the Ungovernable: The Challenge of a Global Disaggregation of Authority’. Regulation & Governance 1 (1): 88–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruggie, John G. 1998. Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Said, Edward W. 2003. Orientalism. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Satow, Ernest. 2011. A Guide to Diplomatic Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (digital print of the 1917 first edition).Google Scholar

Sawyer, Robert K. 2005. Social Emergence: Societies as Complex Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scales, Len. 2012. The Shaping of German Identity: Authority and Crisis, 1245–1414. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schattenberg, Susanne. 2010. ‘Die Macht des Protokolls und die Ohnmacht der Osmanen: Zum Berliner Kongress 1878’. In Akteure der Außenbeziehungen: Netzwerke und Interkulturalität im historischen Wandel. Edited by Thiessen, Hillard v. and Windler, Christian, 373–390. Köln: Böhlau.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schilling, Heinz. 1991. ‘Formung und Gestalt des internationalen Systems in der werdenden Neuzeit – Phasen und bewegende Kräfte’. In Kontinuität und Wandel in der Staatenordnung der Neuzeit: Beiträge zur Geschichte des internationalen Systems. Edited by Krüger, Peter, 19–46. Marburg: Hitzeroth.Google Scholar

Schilling, Heinz. 2007. Konfessionalisierung und Staatsinteressen: Internationale Beziehungen 1559–1660. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schimank, Uwe, and Volkmann, Ute. 1999. Gesellschaftliche Differenzierung. Bielefeld: Transcript-Verlag.Google Scholar

Schmittner, Martina. 2013. ‘Das “Königreich” zu Mainz. Fastnachtsspiel des Kurmainzer Hofstaats im Schloss Johannisburg’. Der Spessart 107 (2): 19–26.Google Scholar

Schneckener, Ulrich, ed. 2004. States at Risk: Fragile Staaten als Sicherheits- und Entwicklungsproblem (SWP-Studie 43). Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.Google Scholar

Schroeder, Paul W. 1972. Austria, Great Britain and the Crimean War: The Destruction of the European Concert. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Schroeder, Paul W. 1989. ‘The Nineteenth Century System: Balance of Power or Political Equilibrium?’ Review of International Studies 15 (2): 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schroeder, Paul W. 1992. ‘Did the Vienna Settlement Rest on a Balance of Power?’ The American Historical Review 97 (3): 683–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schroeder, Paul W. 1994. The Transformation of European Politics, 1763–1848. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schulz, Matthias. 2009. Normen und Praxis. Das Europäische Konzert der Großmächte als Sicherheitsrat, 1815–1860. Munich: Oldenbourg Verlag.Google Scholar

Schulz, Matthias. 2010. ‘Macht, internationale Politik und Normwandel im Staatensystem des 19. Jahrhunderts’. In Macht und Recht: Völkerrecht in den internationalen Beziehungen. Edited by Lappenküper, Ulrich and Marcowitz, Reiner, 113–134. Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar

Schulze, Hagen. 1994. Staat und Nation in der europäischen Geschichte. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar

Schulze, Hagen. 1998. States, Nations and Nationalism: From the Middle Ages to the Present. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Schwarzenberger, Georg. 1964. Power Politics: A Study of World Society. 3rd ed. London: Stevens.Google Scholar

Scott, Hamish M. 2006. The Birth of a Great Power System, 1740–1815. Harlow: Pearson/Longman.Google Scholar

Senghaas, Dieter, and Mader, Gerald, eds. 2006. Konstruktiver Pazifismus im 21. Jahrhundert: Symposium zum 80. Geburtstag von Dr. Gerald Mader. Wien: LIT.Google Scholar

Shaw, Martin. 1994. Global Society and International Relations: Sociological Concepts and Political Perspectives. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Shaw, Martin. 2000. Theory of the Global State: Globality as Unfinished Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sheehan, Michael. 1996. The Balance of Power: History and Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Siegelberg, Jens. 2000. ‘Staat und internationales System – ein strukturgeschichtlicher Überblick’. In Strukturwandel internationaler Beziehungen: Zum Verhältnis von Staat und internationalem System seit dem Westfälischen Frieden. Edited by Siegelberg, Jens and Schlichte, Klaus, 11–56. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simmel, Georg. 1908. Soziologie: Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot [Sociology: Inquiries into the Construction of Social Forms, 2 vols. Translated and edited by Blasi, J., Jacobs, Anton K. and Kanjirathinkal, Mathew, Leiden: Brill, 2011].Google Scholar

Simpson, Gerry J. 2004. Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Singer, J. David. 1961. ‘The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations’. World Politics 14 (1): 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Speich, Daniel. 2011. ‘The Use of Global Abstractions: National Income Accounting in the Period of Imperial Decline’. Journal of Global History 6 (1): 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spencer, Herbert. (1904) 1966. The Principles of Sociology. Osnabrück: Otto Zeller.Google Scholar

Spencer Brown, George. 1994. Laws of Form. Limited ed. Portland, OR: Cognizer Co.Google Scholar

Spruyt, Hendrik. 1994. The Sovereign State and Its Competitors. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stein, Arthur A. 2008. ‘Incentive Compatibility and Global Governance: Existential Multilateralism, a Weakly Confederal World, and Hegemony’. In Can the World be Governed? Possibilities for Effective Multilateralism. Edited by Alexandroff, Alan S., 17–84. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stetter, Stephan. 2007. World Society and the Middle East: Reconstructions in Regional Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Stetter, Stephan. ed. 2013. Ordnung und Wandel in der Weltpolitik: Konturen einer Soziologie der internationalen Beziehungen (Leviathan, Special Issue Nr. 28). Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stichweh, Rudolf. 2000. Die Weltgesellschaft: Soziologische Analysen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Stichweh, Rudolf. 2013. ‘The History and Systematics of Functional Differentiation in Sociology’. In Bringing Sociology to International Relations: World Politics as Differentiation Theory. Edited by Albert, Mathias, Buzan, Barry, and Zürn, Michael, 50–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stollberg-Rilinger, Barbara. 2008. Des Kaisers alte Kleider: Verfassungsgeschichte und Symbolsprache des Alten Reiches. Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar

Strohmeyer, Arno. 1994. Theorie der Interaktion. Wien: Böhlau.Google Scholar

Suganami, Hidemi. 1978. ‘A Note on the Origins of the Word “International”’. British Journal of International Studies 4 (3): 226–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suzuki, Shogo. 2009. Civilization and Empire: China and Japan’s Encounter with European International Society. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Szanton, David L., ed. 2004. The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Tellis, Ashley J. 2000. Measuring National Power in the Postindustrial Age. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar

Tenbruck, Friedrich H. 1989. ‘Gesellschaftsgeschichte oder Weltgeschichte?’ Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 41 (2): 417–439.Google Scholar

Teschke, Benno. 2003. The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics, and the Making of Modern International Relations. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar

Teschke, Benno. 2006. ‘The Metamorphosis of European Territoriality’. In State Territoriality and European Integration. Edited by Burgess, Michael and Voollard, Hans, 37–67. Milton Park: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Thomas, George M. 2010. ‘Differentiation, Rationalization, and Actorhood in New Systems and World Culture Theories’. In New Systems Theories of World Politics. Edited by Albert, Mathias, Cederman, Lars-Erik, and Wendt, Alexander, 220–248. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Thomas, George M. 2013. ‘Rationalized Cultural Contexts of Functional Differentiation’. In Bringing Sociology to International Relations: World Politics as Differentiation Theory. Edited by Albert, Mathias, Buzan, Barry, and Zürn, Michael, 27–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thornhill, Chris J. 2011. A Sociology of Constitutions: Constitutions and State Legitimacy in Historical-Sociological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tilly, Charles. 1975a. ‘Reflections on the History of European State-Making’. In The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Edited by Tilly, Charles, 3–83. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Tilly, Charles. ed. 1975b. The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Tilly, Charles, and Blockmans, Willem P.. 1994. Cities and the Rise of States in Europe, A.D. 100 to 1800. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Tomuschat, Christian. 1997. ‘International Law as the Constitution of Mankind’. In International Law on the Eve of the Twenty-First Century. Edited by United Nations, 37–50. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar

Tönnies, Ferdinand. 1972. Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundbegriffe der reinen Soziologie. Reprint of 8th ed. of 1935. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft [Community and Society, translated and edited by Charles Price Loomis. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1957].Google Scholar

Touraine, Alain. 1998. ‘Sociology without Society’. Current Sociology 46 (2): 119–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Townes, Miles. 2012. ‘The Spread of TCP/IP: How the Internet Became the Internet’. Millennium – Journal of International Studies 41 (1): 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, Jonathan H., and Maryanski, Alexandra. 1979. Functionalism. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.Google Scholar

Urry, John. 2005. Global Complexity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Vasilache, Andreas, ed. 2014. Gouvernementalität, Staat und Weltgesellschaft: Studien zum Regieren im Anschluss an Foucault. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vec, Milos. 2012. ‘From the Congress of Vienna to the Paris Peace Treaties of 1919’. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law. Edited by Fassbender, Bardo and Peters, Anne, 654–678. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Vital, David. 1967. The Inequality of States. A Study of the Small Power in International Relations. Oxford. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

von Treitschke, Heinrich. 1943. Der Wiener Kongreß. Berlin: Verlag die Heimbücherei.Google Scholar

Wæver, Ole. 2007. ‘Still a Discipline after All These Debates? IR Theory Now and in the Future’. In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Edited by Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, and Smith, Steve, 288–308. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Walker, Rob B. J. 1993. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Walker, Rob B. J. 2010. After the Globe, Before the World. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wallerstein, Immanuel M. 1974–1989. The Modern World-System (3 vols). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Wallerstein, Immanuel M. 2011. The Modern World-System IV: Centrist Liberalism Triumphant, 1789–1914. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walter, Jochen. 2008. Die Türkei – das Ding auf der Schwelle: (De-)Konstruktionen der Grenzen Europas. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar

Walter, Jochen, and Albert, Mathias. 2009. ‘Turkey on the European Doorstep: British and German Debates about Turkey in the European Communities’. Journal of International Relations and Development 12 (3): 223–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waltz, Kenneth N. 1959. Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Watson, Adam. 1990. ‘Systems of States’. Review of International Studies 16 (2): 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watson, Adam. 2007. Hegemony and History. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Weber, Eugen. 1976. Peasants into Frenchmen: The Modernization of Rural France. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wendt, Alexander. 2003. ‘Why a World State is Inevitable’. European Journal of International Relations 9 (4): 491–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wendt, Alexander. 2010. ‘Flatland: Quantum Mind and the International Hologram’. In New Systems Theories of World Politics. 279–310. Edited by Albert, Mathias, Cederman, Lars-Erik, and Wendt, Alexander. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Wendt, Alexander. 2015. Quantum Mind and Social Science. Unifying Physical and Social Ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wenzlhuemer, Roland. 2010. ‘Globalization, Communication and the Concept of Space in Global History’. In Global Communication: Telecommunication and Global Flows of Information in the Late 19th and Early 20th Century: Special Issue of Historical Social Research. Edited by Wenzlhuemer, Roland, 19–47. Köln: Center for Historical Social Research.Google Scholar

Werron, Tobias. 2010. Der Weltsport und sein Publikum: Zur Autonomie und Entstehung des modernen Sports. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.Google Scholar

Werron, Tobias. 2012. ‘Ist “der Nationalstaat” ein Produkt oder ein Opfer “der Globalisierung”? Sieben Thesen zur Beziehung von Nationalstaatsmodell und Globalisierungsprozessen’. In Transnationale Vergesellschaftungen: Verhandlungen des 35. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Frankfurt am Main 2010. Edited by Soeffner, Hans-Georg, 1–14. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar

Werron, Tobias. 2013. Soziologie globaler Konkurrenz. Beiträge zur Verknüpfung von Soziologie der Konkurrenz und neuerer Globalisierungs- und Weltgesellschaftsforschung. Habilitation thesis, Faculty of Sociology, Bielefeld University.Google Scholar

Wesel, Reinhard. 2004. Symbolische Politik der Vereinten Nationen: Die ‘Weltkonferenzen’ als Rituale. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitman, Richard G. 2011. Normative Power Europe: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiener, Antje. 2008. The Invisible Constitution of Politics. Contested Norms and International Encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiener, Antje. 2014. A Theory of Contestation. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wight, Martin. 1977. Systems of States. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar

Wight, Martin. 2002. Power Politics. Edited by Bull, Hedley, Holbraad, Carsten, and Spence, Jack. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Wilde, Ralph. 2009. International Territorial Administration: How Trusteeship and the Civilizing Mission Never Went Away. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wörner, Martin. 2000. Die Welt an einem Ort: Illustrierte Geschichte der Weltausstellungen. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar

Wright, Moorhead. 1975. Theory and Practice of the Balance of Power, 1486–1914: Selected European Writings. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Wright, Quincy. 1955. The Study of International Relations. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar

Yetiv, Steve. 2012. ‘History, International Relations, and Integrated Approaches: Thinking about Greater Interdisciplinarity’. International Studies Perspectives 12 (2): 94–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zürn, Michael. 2004. ‘Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems’. Government and Opposition 39 (2): 260–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zürn, Michael. 2007. ‘Institutionalisierte Ungleichheit in der Weltpolitik. Jenseits der Alternative “Global Governance” versus “American Empire”’. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 48 (4): 680–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar