Crossref Citations
This Book has been
cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Sternberg, Robert J.
1996.
Personality, pupils, and purple cows: we have the right answers, but do we have the right questions?.
European Journal of Personality,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 5,
p.
447.
Zhang, Li-Fang
and
Sachs, John
1997.
Assessing Thinking Styles in the Theory of Mental Self-Government: A Hong Kong Validity Study.
Psychological Reports,
Vol. 81,
Issue. 3,
p.
915.
Sternberg, Robert J.
O'Hara, Linda A.
and
Lubart, Todd I.
1997.
Creativity as Investment.
California Management Review,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 1,
p.
8.
Sternberg, Robert J.
1998.
Abilities Are Forms of Developing Expertise.
Educational Researcher,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 3,
p.
11.
STERNBERG, ROBERT J.
1998.
Cognitive Mechanisms in Human Creativity: Is Variation Blind or Sighted?.
The Journal of Creative Behavior,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 3,
p.
159.
Sternberg, Robert J.
1998.
A Balance Theory of Wisdom.
Review of General Psychology,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 4,
p.
347.
Sternberg, Robert J.
and
Grigorenko, Elena L.
1998.
Myths in Psychology and Education regarding the Gene-Environment Debate.
Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education,
Vol. 100,
Issue. 3,
p.
536.
Fujitsubo, Lani C.
1998.
Developing and Enhancing Successful Intelligence in Introductory Psychology Students: An Interview with Robert J. Sternberg.
Teaching of Psychology,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 3,
p.
227.
Sternberg, Robert J.
1998.
Styles of Thinking and Learning.
Canadian Journal of School Psychology,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 2,
p.
15.
Zhang, Li‐fang
and
Sternberg, Robert J.
1998.
The pentagonal implicit theory of giftedness revisited:A cross‐validation in Hong Kong.
Roeper Review,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 2,
p.
149.
Sternberg, Robert J.
and
Grigorenko, Elena L.
1998.
Myths in Psychology and Education regarding the Gene-Environment Debate.
Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education,
Vol. 100,
Issue. 3,
p.
536.
Sternberg, Robert J.
and
Grigorenko, Elena L.
1999.
Myths in Psychology and Education regarding the Gene-Environment Debate.
Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education,
Vol. 100,
Issue. 3,
p.
536.
Dai, David Yun
and
Feldhusen, John F.
1999.
A validation study of the thinking styles inventory:Implications for gifted education.
Roeper Review,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 4,
p.
302.
O'Neil, H.F.
1999.
Perspectives on computer-based performance assessment of problem solving.
Computers in Human Behavior,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 3-4,
p.
255.
Zhang, Li-Fang
1999.
Further Cross-Cultural Validation of the Theory of Mental Self-Government.
The Journal of Psychology,
Vol. 133,
Issue. 2,
p.
165.
Malpass, John R.
O'Neil, Harold F.
and
Hocevar, Dennis
1999.
Self‐regulation, goal orientation, self‐efficacy, worry, and high‐stakes math achievement for mathematically gifted high school students1,2.
Roeper Review,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 4,
p.
281.
Davies, Mike
and
Edwards, Gwyn
1999.
Will the Curriculum Caterpillar Ever Learn to Fly?.
Cambridge Journal of Education,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 2,
p.
265.
Cano-García, Francisco
and
Hughes, Elaine Hewitt
2000.
Learning and Thinking Styles: An analysis of their interrelationship and influence on academic achievement.
Educational Psychology,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 4,
p.
413.
Black, Paul
2000.
Research and the Development of Educational Assessment.
Oxford Review of Education,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 3-4,
p.
407.
Zhang, Li-fang
2000.
Are Thinking Styles and Personality Types Related?.
Educational Psychology,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 3,
p.
271.