Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T14:51:16.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Mental torture: a critique of erasures in US law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2014

David Luban
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

Introduction

  1. As flies to wanton boys, are we to th’ gods,

  2. They kill us for their sport.

  1. John McCain’s bones may have been broken, but his spirit never was.

Torture can be psychological as well as physical. Prolonged isolation, sensory deprivation, humiliation and sexual degradation, close confinement in coffin-like boxes, and threats to you or those you love all produce horrific mental suffering. The forms it takes are hardly mysterious, and we can describe them in everyday language as well as psychiatric categories: despair, loneliness, disorientation, terror, depression, confusion, claustrophobia, anxiety, and loss of personality. Mental suffering may take the form of clinically recognized psychiatric conditions like post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but it need not.

Both US and international law recognize that torture can be psychological as well as physical. The UN Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT) defines torture as “severe pain or suffering, whether mental or physical,”3 and the US torture statute likewise recognizes that “severe physical or mental pain or suffering” intentionally inflicted by government agents constitutes torture, a crime that carries sentences from twenty years to life.4 The similarity is no coincidence: the statute represents Congress’ implementation in 1994 of CAT, as required by Article 4 of the convention. The convention and the US torture statute also specify mens rea and circumstance in their definitions of the crime of torture, but the “severe physical or mental pain or suffering” formula is the definitional core of what it is that torturers inflict on their victims.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Neilson, William Allan and Hill, Charles Jarvis, Eds., The Complete Plays and Poems of William Shakespeare (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1942), p. 1166.Google Scholar
Thompson, Senator Fred, Speech at the Republican National Convention (Sept. 2, 2008), New York Times, Sept. 3, 2008
McCoy, Alfred W., A Question of Torture: CIA Interrogation, from the Cold War to the War on Terror (New York: Henry Holt, 2006), pp. 100–2.Google Scholar
Shue, Henry, “Torture,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 7 (1978), 124–43.Google Scholar
Bufacchi, Vittorio and Arrigo, Jean Maria, “Torture, Terrorism and the State: A Refutation of the Ticking-Bomb Argument,” Journal of Applied Philosophy, 23 (2006), 355–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association for the Prevention of Torture, “Defusing the Ticking Bomb Scenario: Why We Must Say No to Torture, Always” (2007), p. 11
Allhoff, Fritz, Terrorism, Ticking Time-Bombs, and Torture: A Philosophical Analysis (University of Chicago Press, 2012);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brecher, Bob, Torture and the Ticking Bomb (Oxford: Blackwell, 2007);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginbar, Yuval, Why Not Torture Terrorists? Moral, Practical, and Legal Aspects of the “Ticking Bomb” Justification for Torture (Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shue, Henry, “Torture in Dreamland,” Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 37 (2006), 231–9.Google Scholar
Parry, John T., Understanding Torture: Law, Violence, and Political Identity (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2010);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sussman, David, “‘Torture Lite’: A Response,” Ethics and International Affairs, 23 (2009), 63–7;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sussman, David, “What’s Wrong with Torture?”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 33 (2005), 1–33;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfendale, Jessica, “The Myth of ‘Torture Lite,’” Ethics and International Affairs, 23 (2009), 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rejali, Darius, Torture and Democracy (Princeton University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Fried, Charles and Fried, Gregory, Because It Is Wrong: Torture, Privacy and Presidential Power in the Age of Terror (New York: Norton, 2010);Google Scholar
Matthews, Richard, The Absolute Violation: Why Torture Must Be Prohibited (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2008);Google Scholar
Wolfendale, Jessica, Torture and the Military Profession (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Matthew with Bruning, John R., How to Break a Terrorist: The U.S. Interrogators Who Used Brains, Not Brutality, to Take Down the Deadliest Man in Iraq (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2008);Google Scholar
Mackey, Chris and Miller, Greg, The Interrogators: Inside the Secret War Against Al Qaeda (2004);
Danner, Mark, “US Torture: Voices from the Black Sites,” New York Review of Books (Apr. 9, 2009)
Bybee, Jay S., Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, for Gonzales, Alberto R., Counsel to the President (Aug. 1, 2002), in Cole, David, Ed., The Torture Memos: Rationalizing the Unthinkable (New York Review of Books, 2009), pp. 41,Google Scholar
Comey, James B., Deputy Attorney General, US Department of Justice (Dec. 30, 2004), in Cole, Torture Memos, pp. 128,
Ryle, Gilbert, The Concept of Mind (London: Hutchinson, 1949), pp. 15–16.Google Scholar
Mayerfeld, Jamie, “Playing by Our Own Rules: How U.S. Marginalization of International Human Rights Law Led to Torture,” Harvard Human Rights Journal, 20 (2007), pp. 89–140.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Uwe, “Documenting the Neurobiology of Psychological Torture: Conceptual and Neuropsychological Observations,” in Ojeda, Almerindo E., Ed., The Trauma of Psychological Torture (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2008), pp. 163–72,Google Scholar
Cacioppo, John T. and Patrick, William, Loneliness: Human Nature and the Need for Social Connection (New York: Norton, 2008), pp. 92–109;Google Scholar
Rizzo, John A., Senior Deputy General Counsel, Central Intelligence Agency (May 10, 2005),
Cicero, Marcus Tullius, De Officiis (Page, T. E. and Rouse, W. H. D., Eds., Miller, Walter, Trans.) (London: William Heinemann, 1913), pp. 376–8Google Scholar
Mayer, Jane, The Dark Side: The Inside Story of How the War on Terror Turned into a War on American Ideals (New York: Doubleday, 2008).Google Scholar
Bloche, M. Gregg, The Hippocratic Myth: Why Doctors Are Under Pressure to Ration Care, Practice Politics, and Compromise Their Promise to Heal (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011), pp. 129–32.Google Scholar
Eban, Katherine, “Rorschach and Awe,” Vanity Fair (July 17, 2007) ()
Mayer, Jane, “The Experiment,” New Yorker (July 11, 2005) ()
Senate Committee on Armed Services, 110th Congress, Inquiry into the Treatment of Detainees in U.S. Custody (Committee Print, 2008).
Orwell, George, Nineteen Eighty-Four (London: Alfred A. Knopf, 1992), pp. 296–300,Google Scholar
White, Josh, “Tactic Used After It Was Banned: Detainees at Guantanamo Were Moved Often, Documents Say,” Washington Post (Aug. 8, 2008)
Woodward, Bob, “Detainee Tortured, Says U.S. Official: Trial Overseer Cites ‘Abusive’ Methods Against 9/11 Suspect,” Washington Post (Jan. 14, 2009)
Gawande, Atul, “Hellhole,” New Yorker (Mar. 30, 2009)
Shue, Henry, “Target-Selection Norms, Torture Norms, and Growing US Permissiveness,” in Strachan, Hew and Scheipers, Sibylle, Eds., The Changing Character of War (Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 464–83,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggs, Kate, Blakeley, Richard, and Marwaha, Jasmine, “Prolonged Mental Harm: The Torturous Reasoning Behind a New Standard for Psychological Abuse,” Harvard Human Rights Journal, 20 (2007), 263–92.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Eric and Marshall, Carolyn, “In Secret Unit’s ‘Black Room,’ a Grim Portrait of U.S. Abuse,” New York Times (Mar. 19, 2006)
Jeffreys, Derek S., Spirituality and the Ethics of Torture (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Başoğlu, Metin, “A Multivariate Contextual Analysis of Torture and Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Treatments: Implications for an Evidence-Based Definition of Torture,” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 79 (2009), 135–45,CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Başoğlu, Metin, Livanou, Maria, and Crnobaric, Cvetana, “Torture vs Other Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Treatment: Is the Distinction Real or Apparent?”, Archives of General Psychiatry, 64 (2007), 277–85,CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bush, George W., Decision Points (London: Virgin Books, 2011), p. 171.Google Scholar
Taylor, Greg, “Concepts of Intention in German Criminal Law,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 24 (2004), 99–127,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Ira, Many Thousands Gone: The First Two Centuries of Slavery in North America (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998), pp. 115–16.Google Scholar
Finley, Moses I., Ancient Slavery and Modern Ideology (Shaw, Brent D., Ed.) (Princeton, NJ: Markus Wiener, 1998), pp. 189–90Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark V., The American Law of Slavery 1810–1860: Considerations of Humanity and Interest (Princeton University Press, 1981)Google Scholar
Sands, Philippe, Torture Team: Rumsfeld’s Memo and the Betrayal of American Values (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008);Google Scholar
Jaffer, Jameel and Singh, Amrit, Administration of Torture: A Documentary Record from Washington to Abu Ghraib and Beyond (New York: Columbia University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shane, Scott and Mazzetti, Mark, “In Adopting Harsh Tactics, No Look at Past Use,” New York Times, Apr. 22, 2009
Bloche, M. Gregg, editorial, “Torture-Lite: It’s Wrong, and It Might Work,” Washington Post (May 27, 2011)
Suskind, Ron, The One Percent Doctrine: Deep Inside America’s Pursuit of Its Enemies Since 9/11 (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2006), pp. 115–16.Google Scholar
Kreimer, Seth F., “Too Close to the Rack and the Screw: Constitutional Constraints on Torture in the War on Terror,” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 6 (2003), 278–325,Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, “Torture and Positive Law: Jurisprudence for the White House,” Columbia Law Review, 105 (2005), 1681–1750,Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×