Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T19:22:07.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Continuity in change: Brazilian authoritarianism and democratization in comparative perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2010

Frances Hagopian
Affiliation:
Tufts University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

This study has been concerned primarily with explaining why the strategic state elite governing the Brazilian bureaucratic-authoritarian regime failed in its mission to recast the national political system, why traditional politics and a regional, traditional political elite survived rapid economic and social modernization and significant attempts at political restructuring, and what the consequences of the persistent dominance of this class have been for Brazil's new and future democracy. Whatever the expectations that regional political elites should have been easily able, in their own states, to survive a military project to “technocratize” the state, it was by no means assured that these elites could have withstood the regime's initial attacks on it to steer bureaucratic authoritarianism through its rocky second decade and the transition to democracy. It was even less apparent that traditional, clientelistic, and even oligarchical politics of the sort decried by Cardoso and Weffort in the opening passages of this book should have been restored after regime change.

Brazil's military governors initially proposed to rationalize the state, a project that was quite radical politically for it would have altered the historical patterns of decision making and elite participation in Brazilian politics. Backed by a new hegemonic alliance of foreign and domestic entrepreneurs and a technically competent state elite, the military attempted to centralize fiscal and political decisions beyond the reach of the regional oligarchies in the innermost circles of the federal state. It also set out to substitute technocratic rationality for clientelism in the state bureaucracies, thus depriving the regional oligarchies of their power bases in the state.

Ultimately, the military did not reformat patterns of politics ingrained in the fabric of Brazilian society for nearly a century.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×