Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 56
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
November 2012
Print publication year:
2012
Online ISBN:
9780511675768

Book description

A comprehensive exposition of the transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics (TI), this book sheds new light on longstanding problems in quantum theory and provides insight into the compatibility of TI with relativity. It breaks new ground in interpreting quantum theory, presenting a compelling new picture of quantum reality. The book shows how TI can be used to solve the measurement problem of quantum mechanics and explain other puzzles, such as the origin of the 'Born Rule' for the probabilities of measurement results. It addresses and resolves various objections and challenges to TI, such as Maudlin's inconsistency challenge. It explicitly extends TI into the relativistic domain, providing new insight into the basic compatibility of TI with relativity and the physical meaning of 'virtual particles'. This book is ideal for researchers and graduate students interested in the philosophy of physics and the interpretation of quantum mechanics.

Reviews

'The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics raises many questions, and raises them forcefully and well. Anyone interested in the thorny questions of possibility and actuality will find it intriguing, and with some study, perhaps inspiring.'

Chris Fields Source: Disputatio

'There is a lot to absorb in this stimulating book.'

Piero Scaruffi Source: scaruffi.com

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

References

Aharonov, Y. and Albert, D. (1981). “Can we make sense out of the measurement process in relativistic quantum mechanics?Physical Review D 24, 359–70.
Allison, W. W. M. and Cobb, J. H. (1980). Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 30, 253.
Anandan, J. (1997). “Classical and quantum physical geometry.” In R. S. Cohen, M. Horne and J. Stachel (eds), Potentiality, Entanglement and Passion-at-a-distance – Quantum Mechanical Studies for Abner Shimony, Vol. 2. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 31–52. Preprint: http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/9712/9712015v1.pdf
Arndt, M. and Zeilinger, A. (2003). “Buckeyballs and the dual-slit experiment.” In J. Al-Khalili (ed.), Quantum: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Auyang, S. (1995). How is Quantum Field Theory Possible?New York: Oxford.
Bacciagaluppi, G. and Crull, E. (2009). “Heisenberg (and Schrödinger, and Pauli) on hidden variables.” http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00004759/01/SHPMP_paper_07_10_09.pdf
Barbour, J. B. (1982). “Relational concepts of space and time.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 33, 251–74.
Barnum, H. (1990). “Dieks’ realistic interpretation of quantum mechanics: a comment.” Preprint: philsci-archive.pitt.edu/2649/1/dieks.pdf
Bell, J. S. (1990). “Against measurement.” Physics World, August, 33–41.
Bennett, C. L. (1987). “Precausal quantum mechanics.” Physical Review A 36, 4139–48.
Berestetskii, V., Lifschitz, E. and Petaevskii, L. (1971). Quantum Electrodynamics. Landau and Lifshitz Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol 4. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Berestetskii, V., Lifschitz, E. and Petaevskii, L. (2004). Quantum Electrodynamics, 2nd edn. Landau and Lifshitz Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol 4. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Berkovitz, J. (2002). “On causal loops in the quantum realm.” In T. Placek and J. Butterfield (eds), Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Modality, Probability and Bell’s Theorems. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 233–55.
Berkovitz, J. (2008). “On predictions in retro-causal interpretations of quantum mechanics.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39, 709–35.
Bethe, H. (1930). “Zur Theorie des Durchgangs schneller Korpuskularstrahlen durch Materie.” Annalen der Physik 397, 325–400.
Bohr, A., Mottelson, B. and Ulfbeck, O. (2003). “The principle underlying quantum mechanics.” Foundations of Physics 34, 405–17.
Braddon-Mitchell, D. (2004). “How do we know it is now now?Analysis 64, 199–203.
Breitenbach, G.Schiller, S. and Mlynek, J. (1997). “Measurement of the quantum states of squeezed light.” Nature 387, 471.
Broad, C. D. (1923). Scientific Thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
Brown, H. (2002). Physical Relativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brown, H. R., and Wallace, D. (2005). “Solving the measurement problem: de Broglie–Bohm loses out to Everett.” Foundations of Physics 35, 517–40.
Brush, S. (1976). The Kind of Motion We Call Heat: History of the Kinetic Theory of Gases in the Nineteenth Century. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Bub, J. (1997). Interpreting the Quantum World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bub, J., Clifton, R. and Monton, B. (1997). “The bare theory has no clothes.” In R. Healey and G. Hellman (eds), Minnesota Studies in Philosophy of Science XVII. University of Minnesota.
Butterfield, J. (2011). “On time chez Dummett.” Preprint: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/8848/1/ChezDummettJNB.pdf. [A shorter version is forthcoming in a special issue of European Journal of Analytical Philosophy in honor of Michael Dummett.]
Callender, C. (2002). “Thermodynamic asymmetry in time.” In E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2002 edition), URL: <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2001/entries/time-thermo/>
Callender, C. (2010). “Is time an illusion?Scientific American 302(6), 58–65.
Chiatti, L. (1995). “The path integral and transactional interpretation.” Foundations of Physics 25, 481–90.
Clifton, R. and Halvorsen, H. (2000). “Are Rindler quanta real? Inequivalent concepts in quantum field theory.” Preprint: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/73/1/rindler.pdf
Clifton, R. and Monton, B. (1999). “Losing your marbles in wavefunction collapse theories.” British Journal of Philosophical Science 50(4), 697–717.
Cramer, J. G. (1980). “Generalized absorber theory and the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox.” Physical Review D 22, 362–76.
Cramer, J. G. (1983). “The arrow of electromagnetic time and the generalized absorber theory.” Foundations of Physics 13, 887–902.
Cramer, J. G. (1986). “The transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics.” Reviews of Modern Physics 58, 647–88.
Cramer, J. G. (1988). “An overview of the transactional interpretation.” International Journal of Theoretical Physics 27, 227.
Cramer, J. G. (2005). “The quantum handshake: a review of the transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics.” Presented at “Time-Symmetry in Quantum Mechanics” Conference, Sydney, Australia, July 23, 2005. Available at: http://faculty.washington.edu/jcramer/PowerPoint/Sydney\_20050723\_a.ppt
Davies, P. C. W. (1970). “A quantum theory of Wheeler–Feynman electrodynamics.” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 68, 751.
Davies, P. C. W. (1971). “Extension of Wheeler–Feynman quantum theory to the relativistic domain I. Scattering processes.” Journal of Physics A: General Physics 6, 836.
Davies, P. C. W. (1972). “Extension of Wheeler–Feynman quantum theory to the relativistic domain II. Emission processes.” Journal of Physics A: General Physics 5, 1025–36.
de Broglie, L. (1923). Comptes Rendues 177, 507–10.
de Broglie, L. (1924). “On the theory of quanta.” PhD Dissertation.
Deutsch, D. (1999). “Quantum theory of probability and decisions.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A455, 3129–37.
Devitt, M. (1991). Realism and Truth, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
DeWitt, B. (1970). “Quantum mechanics and reality: could the solution to the dilemma of indeterminism be a universe in which all possible outcomes of an experiment actually occur?Physics Today 23, 30–40.
DeWitt, B. (2003). The Global Approach to Quantum Field Theory, Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dirac, P. A. M. (1927). “The quantum theory of the emission and absorption of radiation,” Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series A 114, 243–65.
Dirac, P. A. M. (1938). Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series A 167, 148–68.
Dolce, D. (2011). “de Broglie deterministic dice and emerging relativistic quantum mechanics.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 306, 012049.
Dorato, M. and Felline, L. (2011). “Scientific explanation and scientific structuralism.” In A. Bokulich and P. Bokulich (eds), Scientific Structuralism. Boston Studies in Philosophy of Science. Berlin: Springer. Preprint: http://philsciarchive.pitt.edu/5095/1/Structural_Explanationsfinal.pdf
Dowe, P. (2000). Physical Causation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dummett, M. (1964). “Bringing about the past.” Philosophical Review 73(3), 338–59.
Dyson, F. (2009). “Birds and frogs.” AMS Einstein lecture. Notices of the AMS 56, 212–23.
Earman, J. (1986). “Why space is not a substance (at least not to first degree).” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 67, 225–44.
Earman, J. (2008). “Reassessing the prospects for a growing block model of the universe.” International Studies in Philosophy of Science 22, 135–64.
Einstein, A. (2010). Sidelights on Relativity. Whitefish, MT: Kessinger Publishing.
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. and Rosen, N. (1935). “Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?Physical Review 47(10), 777–80.
Eisberg, R. and Resnick, R. (1974). Quantum Physics of Atoms, Molecules, Solids, Nuclei, and Particles. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Elitzur, A. C., and Vaidman, L. (1993). “Quantum mechanical interaction-free measurements.” Foundations of Physics 23, 987–97.
Elitzur, A. C., Dolev, S. and Zeilinger, A. (2002). “Time-reversed EPR and the choice of histories in quantum mechanics.” In Proceedings of XXII Solvay Conference in Physics, Special Issue, Quantum Computers and Computing, 452–61.
Englert, F. and Brout, R. (1964). “Broken symmetry and the mass of gauge vector mesons.” Physical Review Letters 13, 321–3.
Everett, H. (1957). “Relative state formulation of quantum mechanics.” Reviews of Modern Physics 29, 454–62.
Falkenburg, B. (2010). Particle Metaphysics. Berlin: Springer.
Feynman, R. P. (1985). QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Feynman, R. P. (1998). Theory of Fundamental Processes. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Feynman, R. P., and Hibbs, A. R. (1965). Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. and Sands, M. (1964). The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol. 3. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Fields, C. (2011). “Classical system boundaries cannot be determined within quantum Darwinism.” Physics Essays 24, 518–22.
Forrest, P. (2004). “The real but dead past: a reply to Braddon–Mitchell.” Analysis 64, 358–62.
Friedman, M. (1986). Foundations of Space–Time Theories. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Frigg, R. (2005). “Review of Kuhlman, Lyre and Wayne (2002).” Philosophy of Science 72, 511–14.
Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A. and Weber, T. (1986). Physical Review D 34, 470.
Gisin, N. (2010). “The free will theorem, stochastic quantum dynamics and true becoming in relativistic quantum physics,” arXiv:1002.1392v1 [quant-ph].
Greaves, H. (2004) “Understanding Deutsch’s probability in a deterministic multiverse.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35, 423–56.
Grunbaum, A. (1973). Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Guralnik, G. S., Hagen, C. R. and Kibble, T. W. B. (1964). “Global conservation laws and massless particles.” Physical Review Letters 13, 585–7.
Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hardy, L. (1992a). “Quantum mechanics, local realistic theories, and Lorentz-invariant realistic theories”. Physical Review Letters 68 (20), 2981–4.
Hardy, L. (1992b). “On the existence of empty waves in quantum theory.” Physical Letters A 167, 11–16.
Heathwood, C. (2005). “The real price of the dead past: a reply to Forrest and to Braddon–Mitchell.” Analysis 65, 249–51.
Heisenberg, W. (1958). Physics and Philosophy. New York: Harper Row.
Heisenberg, W. (2007). Physics and Philosophy. Harper Perennial Modern Classics edition. New York: HarperCollins.
Hellwig, K. E., and Kraus, K. (1970). “Formal description of measurements in local quantum field theory.” Physical Review D 1, 566–71.
Higgs, P. W. (1964). “Broken symmetries and the masses of gauge bosons.” Physical Review Letters 13, 508–9.
Hoyle, F. and Narlikar, J. V. (1969). Annals of Physics 54, 207–39.
Jammer, M. (1993). Concepts of Space: the History of Theories of Space in Physics. New York: Dover Books.
Kant, I. (1996). Critique of Pure Reason. Indianapolis: Hackett. English translation, Werner Pluha.
Kastner, R. E. (1999). “Time-symmetrized quantum theory, counterfactuals, and ‘advanced action’.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 30, 237–59.
Kastner, R. E. (2006). “Cramer’s transactional interpretation and causal loop problems.” Synthese 150, 1–14.
Kastner, R. E. (2011a). “de Broglie waves as the ‘bridge of becoming’ between quantum theory and relativity.” Foundations of Science, forthcoming. doi:10.1007/s10699–011-9273-4.
Kastner, R. E. (2011b). “On delayed choice and contingent absorber experiments.” ISRN Mathematical Physics, Vol. 2012, Article ID 617291, 9 pages, 2012. doi:10.5402/2012/617291.
Kastner, R. E. (2011c). “The broken symmetry of time.” AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1408, pp. 7–21. doi:10.1063/1.3663714.
Kent, A. (2010). “One world versus many: the inadequacy of Everettian accounts of evolution, probability, and scientific confirmation.” In S. Saunders, J. Barrett, A. Kent and D. Wallace (eds), Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory and Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kim, Y-H., Yu, R., Kulik, S. P., Shih, Y. H. and Scully, M. (2000). “A delayed choice quantum eraser.” Physical Review Letters 84, 1–5.
Kondo, J. (1964). “Resistance minimum in dilute magnetic alloys.” Progress of Theoretical Physics 32, 37.
Konopinski, E. J. (1980). Electromagnetic Fields and Relativistic Particles. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ladyman, J. (2009). “Structural realism.” In E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2009 edition). URL: <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/structural-realism/>
Lamb, W. and Retherford, R. (1947). “Fine structure of the hydrogen atom by a microwave method.” Physical Review 72(3), 241–3.
Landau, L. D., and Peierls, R. (1931). Zeitschrift für Physik 69, 56.
Lewis, D. (1986). On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lewis, P .J. (2007). “How Bohm’s theory solves the measurement problem.” Philosophy of Science 74, 749–60.
MacKinnon, E. (2005). “Generating ontology: from quantum mechanics to quantum field theory.” Preprint: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/2467/1/Ontology.pdf
Marchildon, L. (2006). “Causal loops and collapse in the transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics.” Physics Essays 19, 422.
Marchildon, L. (2008). “On relativistic element of reality.” Foundations of Physics 38, 804–17.
Maudlin, T. (1995), “Why Bohm’s theory solves the measurement problem.” Philosophy of Science 62, 479–83.
Maudlin, T. (2002). Quantum Nonlocality and Relativity: Metaphysical Intimations of Modern Physics, 2nd edn. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
McMullin, E. (1984). “A case for scientific realism.” In J. Leplin (ed.), Scientific Realism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
McTaggart, J. E. (1908). “The unreality of time.” Mind: A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 17, 456–73.
Mermin, D. (1989). “What’s wrong with this pillow?Physics Today 42(4), 9.
Miller, D. (2011). Private communication.
Neihardt, J. G. (1972). Black Elk Speaks. New York: Washington Square Press.
Norton, J. (2010). “Time really passes.” Humana Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies 13, 23–34.
Orozco, L. (2002). “A double-slit quantum eraser experiment.” http://grad.physics.sunysb.edu/~amarch/ [accessed September 6, 2011].
Pegg, D. T. (1975). Reports on Progress in Physics 38, 1339.
Penrose, R. (1989). The Emperor’s New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and Laws of Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Petersen, A. (1963). “The philosophy of Niels Bohr.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 19(7).
Price, H. (1996). Time’s Arrow and Archimedes’ Point. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Psillos, S. (1999). Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. London: Routledge.
Psillos, S. (2003). Causation and Explanation. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.
Pusey, M., Barrett, J. and Rudolph, T. (2011). “The quantum state cannot be interpreted statistically.” Preprint: quant-ph/1111.3328
Putnam, H. (1967). “Time and physical geometry.” Journal of Philosophy 64, 240–47. [Reprinted in Putnam’s Collected Papers, Vol. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.]
Quine, W. (1953). From a Logical Point of View. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
Redhead, M. (1995). “More ado about nothing.” Foundations of Physics 25, 123–37.
Reichenbach, H. (1958). The Philosophy of Space and Time. New York: Dover Books. Trans. M. Reichenbach and J. Freund.
Rietdijk, C. W. (1966). “A rigorous proof of determinism derived from the special theory of relativity.” Philosophy of Science 33, 341–4.
Rovelli, C. (1996). “Relational quantum mechanics.” International Journal of Theoretical Physics 35(8), 1637–78.
Russell, B. (1913). “On the notion of cause.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 13, 1–26.
Russell, B. (1948). Human Knowledge. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Russell, B. (1959). The Problems of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sakurai, J. J. (1973). Advanced Quantum Mechanics, 4th edn. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Sakurai, J. J. (1984). Modern Quantum Mechanics. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Salmon, W. (1984). Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Salmon, W. (1997). “Causality and explanation: a reply to two critiques.” Philosophy of Science 64(3), 461–77.
Savitt, S. (2008). “Being and becoming in modern physics.” In E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2008 edition). URL: <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/spacetime-bebecome/>
Schlosshauer, M. and Fine, A. (2003). “On Zurek’s derivation of the Born Rule.” Foundations of Physics 35(2), 197–213.
Schrödinger, E. (1935). “The present situation in quantum mechanics.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 124, 323–38.
Shimony, A. (2009). “Bell’s theorem.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/bell-theorem/#7
Silberstein, M., Stuckey, W. M. and Cifone, M. (2008). “Why quantum mechanics favors adynamical and acausal interpretations such as relational blockworld over backwardly causal and time-symmetric rivals.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39, 736–51.
Sklar, L. (1974). Space, Time and Spacetime. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Spekkens, R. (2007). “Evidence for the epistemic view of quantum states: a toy theory.” Physical Review A 75, 032110.
Stapp, H. (2011) “Retrocausal effects as a consequence of orthodox quantum mechanics refined to accommodate the principle of sufficient reason.” Preprint: http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.2053
Stein, H. (1968). “On Einstein–Minkowski space-time.” The Journal of Philosophy 65, 5–23.
Stein, H. (1991). “On relativity theory and openness of the future.” Philosophy of Science 58, 147–67.
Stewart, I. and Golubitsky, M. (1992). Fearful Symmetry: Is God A Geometer?Oxford: Blackwell.
Sutherland, R. (2008). “Causally symmetric Bohm model.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39, 782–805.
Teller, P. (1997). An Interpretive Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Teller, P. (2002). “So what is the quantum field?” In M. Kuhlman, H. Lyre and A. Wayne (eds), Ontological Aspects of Quantum Field Theory. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, pp. 145–60.
Tooley, M. (1997). Time, Tense and Causation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Tumulka, R. (2006). “Collapse and relativity.” In A. Bassi, D. Duerr, T. Weber and N. Zanghi (eds), Quantum Mechanics: Are there Quantum Jumps? AIP Conference Proceedings 844, American Institute of Physics, pp. 340–52. Preprint: http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/pdf/0602/0602208v2.pdf
Valentini, A. (1992). “On the pilot-wave theory of classical, quantum and subquantum physics.” PhD Dissertation. Trieste: International School for Advanced Studies.
van Fraassen, B. (1991). Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van Fraassen, B. (2004). The Empiricist Stance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Wallace, D. (2006). “Epistemology quantized: circumstances in which we should come to believe in the Everett interpretation.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57, 655–89.
Weingard, R. (1972). “Relativity and the reality of past and future events.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23, 119–21.
Wheeler, J. A. and Feynman, R. P. (1945). “Interaction with the absorber as the mechanism of radiation.” Reviews of Modern Physics 17, 157–61.
Wheeler, J. A. and Feynman, R. P. (1949). “Classical electrodynamics in terms of direct interparticle action.” Reviews of Modern Physics 21, 425–33.
Wheeler, J. A. and Zurek, W. H. (1983). Quantum Theory and Measurement. Princeton Series in Physics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wilson, K. G. (1971). “Feynman graph expansion for critical exponents.” Physical Review Letters 28, 548.
Wilson, K. G. (1974). Physical Review D 10, 2445.
Wilson, K. G. (1975). “The renormalization group: critical phenomena and the Kondo problem.” Reviews of Modern Physics 47, 773–840.
Worrall, J. (1989). “Structural realism: the best of both worlds?Dialectica 43, 99–124.
Zee, A. (2010). Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Zeh, H. D. (1989). The Physical Basis of the Direction of Time. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Zurek, W. H. (2003). “Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical.” Reviews of Modern Physics 75, 715–75.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.