Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T16:22:09.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Girls on the Sidelines: “Gendered” Development in Early Childhood Classrooms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2009

Sonja De Groot Kim
Affiliation:
Kean University, Union, New Jersey, United States
Bert van Oers
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Wim Wardekker
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Ed Elbers
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
René van der Veer
Affiliation:
Universiteit Leiden
Get access

Summary

In my dissertation on two- and three-year-old children in a child care center (de Groot Kim, 1999), I focused on both verbal and nonverbal communication and was guided by the following broad questions: How do children make themselves understood, and how do children understand the intentions of their peers and their teachers? In this chapter, I focus on the physical activity patterns of some of the two- and three-year-old boys during transition times while they waited in the classroom to go play outside or in the hallway. It appeared that these boys regularly sent their teachers nonverbal, gender-related messages.

I will discuss (1) how socialization of two- and three-year-old boys and girls into their gender roles seemed to be influenced by the sociocultural context of their particular setting, a classroom in a childcare center; (2) how a small group of toddler boys seemed to transform unintentional physical body contact activity into intentional body contact activity, which resulted in gaining earlier access to space and resources and receiving more teacher attention; and (3) how a year later, in response to a different set of sociocultural expectations, some of the three-year-old boys seemed to transform body contact activity into a more socially acceptable, noncontact activity, aided by voice and hand gestures. They similarly gained earlier access to space and resources and received more teacher attention.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Transformation of Learning
Advances in Cultural-Historical Activity Theory
, pp. 358 - 369
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berk, L. E. (1994). Vygotsky's theory: The importance of make-believe play. Young Children, 50 (1), 30–39.Google Scholar
Berk, L. E. (1997). Child development (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Berk, L. E., & Winsler, A. (1995). Scaffolding children's learning: Vygotsky and early childhood education. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.Google Scholar
Bjorklund, D. F., & Brown, R. D. (1998). Physical play and cognitive development: Integrating activity, cognition, and education. Child Development, 69 (3), 604–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanck, P. D., & Rosenthal, R. (1982). Developing strategies for decoding “leaky” messages: On learning how and when to decode discrepant and consistent social communications. In Feldman, R. S. (Ed.), Development of nonverbal behavior in children (pp. 203–255). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyatis, C. J., & Satyaprasad, C. (1994). Children's facial and gestural decoding and encoding relations between skills and with popularity. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 18 (1), 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. (1987). The transactional self. In Bruner, J. & Haste, H. (Eds.), Making sense: The child's construction of the world (pp. 81–96). New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke-Stewart, K. A. (1989). Infant daycare: Maligned or malignant?American Psychologist, 44, 266–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cole, M. (1985). The zone of proximal development: Where culture and cognition create each other. In Wertsch, J. (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 146–161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corsaro, W. A. (1997). The sociology of childhood. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Groot S. (1999). Making sense of my world: The development of communication in two- and three-year old children in a childcare center. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60 (6A), 1898. (UMI No. 9935643).Google Scholar
Kim, Groot S. (2005). Kevin: I gotta get to the market. The development of peer relationships in inclusive early childhood settings. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33 (3), 163–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, J. (1993). Young children's close relationships: Beyond attachment. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. (Ed.). (1995). Connections between emotion and understanding in development. Cognition and Emotion, 9, 2–3. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Duveen, B., & Lloyd, B. (1992). Gender identities and education: The impact of starting school. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Farver, J. M. (1992). An analysis of young American and Mexican children's play dialogues: Illustrative study # 3. In C. Howes, The collaborative construction of pretend (pp. 55–63). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, R. S., Philippot, P., & Custrini, R. J. (1991). Social competence and nonverbal behavior. In Feldman, R. S. & Rime, B., Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior (pp. 329–350). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fromberg, D. P. (1992). A review of research on play. In Seinfeld, C. (Ed.), The early childhood curriculum: A review of current research (2nd ed., pp. 42–84). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Garvey, C. (1984). Children's talk. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Garvey, C. (1990). Play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Göncü, A. (1993). Development of intersubjectivity in the dyadic play of preschoolers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 8, 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graue, M. E., & Walsh, D. J. (1995). Children in context: Interpreting the here and now of children's lives. In Hatch, J. A. (Ed.), Qualitative research in early childhood settings (pp. 135–154). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Kessen, B. (1991). Directions: Where do we turn now?Society for Research in Child Development Newsletter, 2, 12–14.Google Scholar
Leiman, M. (1999). The concept of sign in the work of Vygotsky, Winnicott, and Bakhtin: Further integration of object relations theory and activity theory. In Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamaki, R. L., Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 419–434). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Light, P. (1993). Developing psychologies. In Bennett, M. (Ed.), The development of social cognition: The child as psychologist (pp. 191–200). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Lubeck, S. (1996). Deconstructing “child development knowledge” and “teacher preparation.”Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 11, 147–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maccoby, E. (1994). Commentary: Gender segregation in childhood. In Leaper, C. (Ed.), Childhood gender segregation: Causes and consequences. New Directions for Child Development, Number 65, 87–97. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1986). Event knowledge: Structure and function in development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Nelson, K., Plesa, D., & Henseler, S. (1998). Children's theory of mind: An experiential orientation. Human Development, 41, 7–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellegrini, A. D. (1991). Applied child study: A developmental approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Pellegrini, A. D., & Smith, P. K. (1998). Physical activity play: The nature and function of a neglected aspect of play. Child Development, 3, 577–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philips, D. A., McCartney, K., Scarr, S., & Howes, C. (1987). Selective review of infant daycare research: A cause for concern. Zero to Three, 7, 18–21.Google Scholar
Reis, H. T. (Ed.). (1983). Naturalistic approaches to studying social interaction. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Saarni, C. (1982). Social and affective functions of nonverbal behavior: Developmental concerns. In Feldman, R. S. (Ed.), Development of nonverbal behavior in children (pp. 123–147). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serbin, L. A., Moller, L. C., Gulko, J., Powlishta, K. K., & Colburne, K. A. (1994). The emergence of gender segregation in toddler playgroups. In Leaper, C. (Ed.), Childhood gender segregation: Causes and consequences. New Directions for Child Development, Number 65, 7–17. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Siegal, M., & Storey, R. M. (1985). Daycare and children's conception of moral rules. Child development, 56, 1001–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smetana, J. (1993). Understanding of social rules. In Bennett, M. (Ed.), The development of social cognition: The child as psychologist (pp. 111–141). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J., & Veer, R. (2000). Social mind: Construction of the idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, X., Bernas, R., & Eberhard, P. (2004). Engaging ADHD students in tasks with hand gestures: A pedagogical possibility for teachers. Educational Studies, 30 (3), 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mental action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wittmer, D. S., & Honig, A. S. (1994). Play, story-song, and eating times in child care: Caregiver responses to toddlers and threes. In Goelman, H. & Jacobs, E. V. (Eds.), Children's play in child care settings (pp. 119–147). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×