Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T06:30:25.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - TREATMENT OF MYELOMA-RELATED COMPLICATIONS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2009

S. Vincent Rajkumar
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic, Minnesota
Robert A. Kyle
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic, Minnesota
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Multiple myeloma (MM) is hampered by a number of complications that can result in a poor quality of life and in many instances are contributory causes of death. In this chapter, the treatment of the most frequent complications such as bone disease, renal function impairment, anemia, infections, nervous system involvement, and extramedullary disease are reviewed.

SKELETAL COMPLICATIONS

Incidence and pathogenesis

Bone involvement is the most frequent clinical complication in patients with MM. In this sense, approximately 70% of patients have lytic bone lesions with or without osteoporosis and other 20% have severe osteoporosis without lytic lesions. The skeletal involvement leads to bone pain and can result in pathological fractures. Bone disease in MM results from an imbalance between increased resorption and decreased bone formation. Thus, both malignant plasma cells and bone marrow stromal cells can produce osteoclast-stimulating cytokines such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α; (TNF-α). Moreover, the interaction between the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) (RANK) and RANK ligand can play an important role in cancer-associated bone disease. It seems that the bone involvement in MM is the consequence of an alteration in the cytokine production by the bone marrow microenvironment, thus resulting in the uniform pattern of skeletal involvement. Thus, it has been observed by these authors that patients without lytic lesions at the time of diagnosis usually do not develop lytic lesions later in the course of the disease. These patients commonly have or develop progressive osteopenia resulting in rib or vertebral fractures.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kyle, RA, Gertz, MA, Witzig, TE, et al. Review of 1027 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Mayo Clin Proc 2003;78:21–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lacy, MQ, Donovan, KA, Heimback, JK, Ahmann, GJ, Lust, JA.Comparison of interleukin-1 beta expression by in situ hybridization in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma. Blood 1999;93:300–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Lust, JA, Donovan, KA.The role of interleukin-1 beta in the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 1999;13:1117–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, B, Zhang, XG, Lu, ZY, Bataille, R.Interleukin-6 in multiple myeloma. Blood 1995;85:863–72.Google ScholarPubMed
Li, J, Sarosi, I, Yan, XQ, et al. RANK is the intrinsic hematopoietic cell surface receptor that controls osteoclastogenesis and regulation of bone mass and calcium metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:1566–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bladé, J, Rosiñol, L.Complications of multiple myeloma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2007;21:1231–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bladé, J, San Miguel, JF, Fontanillas, M, et al. Initial treatment of multiple myeloma: long-term results in 914 patients. Hematol J 2001;2:272–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Major, P, Lortholary, A, Hon, J, et al. Zoledronic acid is superior to pamidronate in the treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy: a pooled analysis of two randomized, controlled clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:558–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lathinen, R, Laakso, M, Palva, I, et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled multicentric trial of clodronate in multiple myeloma. Lancet 1992;340:1049–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mccloskey, EV, Maclennan, IC, Drayson, MT, Chapman, C, Dunn, J, Kanis, JA.A randomized trial of the effect of clodronate on skeletal morbidity in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 1998;100:317–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berenson, JR, Lichtenstein, A, Porter, L, et al. Efficacy of pamidronate in reducing skeletal events in patients with advanced multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 1996;334:488–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosen, LS, Gordon, D, Kaminski, M, et al. Zoledronic acid versus pamidronate in the treatment of skeletal metastases in patients with breast cancer or osteolytic lesions of multiple myeloma: a phase III, double blinded, comparative trial. Cancer J 2001;7:377–87.Google ScholarPubMed
Berenson, JR, Hillner, BE, Kyle, RA, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology practice guidelines: the role of bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:3719–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyle, RA, Yee, GC, Somerfield, MR, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 clinical practice guideline update on the role of bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:2464–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimsing, P, Carlson, K, Fayers, P, Turesson, I, Wisloff, F.Randomized study on prophylactic pamidronate 30 mg vs. 90 mg in multiple myeloma (Nordic Study Group). Blood 2007;110:164a (Abstract 533).Google Scholar
Durie, BGM, Katz, M, Crowley, J.Osteonecrosis of the jaw and bisphosphonates (letter). N Engl J Med 2005;353:99–100.Google Scholar
Badros, A, Weikel, D, Salama, A, et al. Osteonecrosis of the jaw in multiple myeloma patients: clinical features and risk factors. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:945–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bamias, A, Kastritis, E, Bamia, C, et al. Osteonecrosis of the jaw in cancer after treatment with bisphosphonates: incidence and risk factors. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:8580–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lacy, MQ, Dispenzieri, A, Gertz, MA, et al. Mayo Clinic consensus statement for the use of bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma. Mayo Clin Proc 2006;81:1047–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durie, BGM, Attal, M, Beksac, M, et al. Use of bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma: IMWG response to Mayo Clinic consensus statement. Mayo Clin Proc 2007; 82:516–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcclung, MR, Lewiecki, EM, Cohen, SB, et al. Denosumab in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density. N Engl J Med 2006;354:821–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexanian, R, Barlogie, B, Dixon, D.Renal failure in multiple myeloma. Pathogenesis and prognostic implications. Arch Intern Med 1990;150:1693–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bladé, J, FernáNdez-Lama, P, Bosch, F, et al. Renal failure in multiple myeloma. Presenting features and predictors of outcome in a series of 94 patients. Arch Intern Med 1998;158:1889–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bladé, J, RosiñOl, L.Renal, hematologic and infectious complications in multiple myeloma. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2005;18:635–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papaiakovou, VE, Bamias, A, Gika, D, et al. Renal failure in multiple myeloma: incidence, correlations and prognostic significance. Leuk Lymphoma 2007;48:337–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, PW.Pathogenesis and treatment of myeloma kidney. J Lab Clin Med 1994;124:484–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Torra, R, Bladé, J, Cases, A, et al. Patients with multiple myeloma and renal failure requiring long-term dialysis: presenting features, response to therapy and outcome in a series of 20 cases. Br J Haematol 1995;91:854–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbate, M, Zoja, C, Remuzzi, G.How does proteinuria cause progressive renal failure? J Am Soc Nephrol 2006;17:2974–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mezzano, SA, Barria, M, Droguett, MA, et al. Tubular NF-kappaB and AP-1 activation in human proteinuric renal disease. Kidney Int 2001;60:1366–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sitia, R, Palladini, G, Merlini, G.Bortezomib in the treatment of AL amyloidosis: targeted therapy? Haematologica 2007;92:1302–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rangan, GK, Wang, Y, Tay, YC, Harris, DC.Inhibition of nuclear factor-κB activation reduces cortical tubulointerstitial injury in proteinuric rats. Kidney Int 1999;56:118–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takase, O, Hirahashi, J, Takayanagi, A, et al. Gene transfer of truncated IkappaBalpha prevents tubulointerstitial injury. Kidney Int 2003;63:501–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bladé, J, Lust, JA, Kyle, RA.Immunoglobulin D myeloma: presenting features, response to therapy, and survival in a series of 53 patients. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:2398–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, RE, Williamson, WC, Mullinax, F, Tung, MY, Still, WJS.Manifestations of systemic light-chain deposition. Am J Med 1976;60:293–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dhodapkar, MV, Merlini, G, Solomon, A.Biology and therapy of immunoglobulin deposition diseases. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 1997;11:89–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernstein, SP, Humes, DH.Reversible renal insufficiency in multiple myeloma. Arch Intern Med 1982;142:2083–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavo, M, Baccarani, M, Galieni, P, et al. Renal failure in multiple myeloma: a study of the presenting findings, response to treatment, and prognosis in 26 patients. Nouv Rev Fr Hematol 1986;28:147–52.Google ScholarPubMed
Cohen, DJ, Sherman, W, Osserman, EF.Acute renal failure in patients with multiple myeloma. Am J Med 1984;76:247–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellquist, UH, Lenhoff, S, Johnsen, HE, et al. Cyclophosphamide plus dexamethasone is an efficient initial treatment before high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of a randomized comparison with vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone. Cancer 2008;112:129–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastritis, E, Anagnostopoulos, A, Roussou, M, et al. Reversibility of renal failure in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with high-dose dexamethasone containing regimens and impact of novel agents. Haematologica 2007;92:546–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Badros, A, Barlogie, B, Siegel, E, et al. Results of autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma with renal failure. Br J Haematol 2001;114:822–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
San Miguel, JF, Lahuerta, JJ, GarcíA-Sanz, R, et al. Are myeloma patients with renal failure candidates for autologous stem cell transplantation? Hematol J 2000;1:28–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, CK, Zangari, M, Barlogie, B.Dialysis-dependent renal failure in patients with myeloma can be reversed by high-dose myeloablative therapy and autotransplant. Bone Marrow Transplant 2004;33:823–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, PG, Sonneveld, P, Schuster, MW, et al. Bortezomib or high-dose dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2005;352:2487–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
RosiñOl, L, Oriol, A, Mateos, MV, et al. Phase II PETHEMA trial of alternating bortezomib and dexamethasone as induction regimen before autologous stem-cell transplantation in younger patients with multiple myeloma: efficacy and clinical implications of tumor response kinetics. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:4452–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oakervee, H, Popat, R, Cavenagh, J.Use of bortezomib as induction therapy prior to stem cell transplantation in frontline treatment of multiple myeloma: impact on stem cell harvesting and engraftment. Leuk Lymphoma 2007;48:1910–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jagannath, S, Barlogie, B, Berenson, JR.Bortezomib in recurrent and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Initial clinical experience in patients with impaired renal function. Cancer 2005;103:1195–2000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chanan-Khan, AA, Kaufman, JL, Metha, J, et al. Activity and safety of bortezomib in multiple myeloma patients with advanced renal failure: a multicenter retrospective study. Blood 2007;109:2604–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ludwig, H, Drach, J, Graf, H, Meran, JG.Reversal of acute renal failure by bortezomib-based chemotherapy in patients with multiple myeloma. Haematologica 2007;92:1411–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, WJ, Kyle, RA, Pineda, AA, O'Brien, PC, Holley, KE.Treatment of renal failure associated to multiple myeloma. Arch Intern Med 1990;150:863–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, WF, Stewart, AK, Rock, GA, et al. Plasma exchange when myeloma presents as acute renal failure. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2005;143:777–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iggo, N, Palmer, AB, Severn, A, et al. Chronic dialysis in patients with multiple myeloma and renal failure: a worthwhile treatment. Q J Med 1989;270:903–10.Google Scholar
Korzets, A, Tam, F, Russell, G, Freehally, J, Walls, J.The role of continuous peritoneal dialysis in end-stage renal failure due to multiple myeloma. Am J Kidney Dis 1990;6:216–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G, Rudnicki, M, Schmaldienst, S, Horl, WH.Effect of dialysis on serum plasma levels of free immunoglobulin light chains in end-stage renal disease patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002;17:879–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchinson, CA, Cockwell, P, Reid, S, et al. Efficient removal of immunoglobulin free-light chains by hemodialysis for multiple myeloma: in vitro and in vivo studies. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 3:886–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergsagel, , Bailey, AJ, Langley, GR, et al. The chemotherapy of plasma cell myeloma and the incidence of acute leukemia. N Engl J Med 1979;301:743–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,Finnish Leukemia Group. Acute leukemia and other secondary neoplasms in patients treated with conventional chemotherapy for multiple myeloma: a Finnish Leukemia group study. Eur J Haematol 2000;65:123–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, H, Rai, K, Bladé, J, et al. Management of disease-related anemia in patients with multiple myeloma or chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: epoietin treatment recommendations. Hematol J 2002;3:121–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rizzo, JD, Lichtin, AE, Woolf, SH, et al. Use of epoietin in patients with cancer: evidence-based clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society of Hematology. Blood 2002;100:2303–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzo, JD, Lichtin, AE, Woolf, SH, et al. Use of epoietin in patients with cancer: evidence-based clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society of Hematology. J Clin Oncol 2002;2:40–63.Google Scholar
Kelleher, P, Chapel, H. Infections: principle of prevention and therapy. In: Metha, J, Singhal, S, eds. Myeloma. London: Martin Dunitz Ldt; 2002:223–39.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, RM, Lea, JR, Griffiths, H, et al. Immunological factors and risk of infection in plateau phase myeloma. J Clin Pathol 1995;48:260–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snowden, L, Gibson, J, Joshua, DE.Frequency of infection in plateau-phase multiple myeloma (letter). Lancet 1994;344:262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, DG, Lindenbaum, J, Garret, TJ.Biphasic pattern of bacterial infection in multiple myeloma. Ann Intern Med 1982;96:47–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyers, BR, Hirschman, SZ, Axelrod, JA.Current pattern of infection in multiple myeloma. Am J Med 1972;52:87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaikh, BS, Lombard, RM, Appelbaum, PC, Bentz, MS.Changing pattern of infection in patients with multiple myeloma. Oncology 1982;39:78–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perri, RT, Hebbel, RP, Oken, MM.Influence of treatment and response status on infection in multiple myeloma. Am J Med 1981;71:935–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oken, MM, Pomeroy, C, Weisdorf, D.Prophylactic antibiotics for the prevention of early infection in multiple myeloma. Am J Med 1996;100:624–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salmon, SE, Samal, BA, Hayes, DM, et al. Role of gammaglobulin for immunoprophylaxis in multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 1967;277:1336–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawler, J. Neurological manifestations of myeloma and their management. In: Malpas, JS, Bergsagel, , Kyle, RA, Anderson, KC, eds. Myeloma: Biology and Management, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Saunders, Elsevier Inc; 2004:269–93.Google Scholar
Posner, JB.Back pain and epidural spinal cord compression. Med Clin North Am 1987;71:185–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nobile-Orazio, E, Meucci, N, Baldini, L, Din Troia, A, Scarlato, G.Long term prognosis of neuropathy associated with antiMAG IgM M-proteins and its relationship to immune therapies. Brain 2000;123:710–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilidreas, C, Anagnostopoulos, A, Karandreas, N, et al. Rituximab therapy in monoclonal IgM-related neuropathies. Leuk Lymphoma 2006;47:859–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, TD, Pestronk, A.IgM antibody related polyneuropathies: B-cell depletion chemotherapy using rituximab. Neurology 1999;52:1701–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodruff, RK, Ireton, HJC.Multiple nerve palsies as the presenting feature of meningeal myelomatosis. Cancer 1982;49:1710–12.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spaar, FW. Paraproteinemias and multiple myeloma. In: Bryn, V, ed. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Amsterdam: Elsevier North Holland Biomedical Press; 1980:131–79.Google Scholar
Fassas, A, Ward, S, Muwalla, F, et al. Myeloma of the central nervous system: strong association with unfavourable chromosomal abnormalities and other high-risk disease features. Leuk Lymphoma 2004;45:291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bladé, J, Kyle, RA, Greipp, PR.Presenting features and prognosis in 72 patients with multiple myeloma who were younger than 40 years. Br J Haematol 1996;93:345–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
RosiñOl, L, Cibeira, MT, Bladé, J, et al. Escape Of Extramedullary Disease to theThalidomide Effect in multiple Myeloma. Haematologica 2004;89:832–6.Google Scholar
Bladé, J, Kyle, RA, Greipp, PR.Multiple myeloma in patients younger than 30 years. Report of 10 cases and review of the literature. Arch Intern Med 1996;156:1463–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dimopoulos, MA, Pouli, A, Anagnostopoulos, A, et al. Macrofocal multiple myeloma in younger patients: a distinct entity with favourable prognosis. Leuk Lymphoma 2006;47: 1553–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RosiñOl, L, Cibeira, MT, Uriburu, C, et al. Bortezomib: an effective agent in extramedullary disease in multiple myeloma. Eur J Haematol 2006;76:405–8.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×