Eastcott, H H G, Pickering, G W, Rob, C G. Reconstruction of internal carotid artery in a patient with intermittent attacks of hemiplegia. Lancet. 1954; ii:954.Google Scholar

North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325:445–53.Google Scholar

European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet. 1998; 351:1379–87.Google Scholar

Barnett, H J, Taylor, D W, Eliasziw, M, et al. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339:1415–25.Google Scholar

Executive Committee of the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA. 1995; 273:1421–8.Google Scholar

Ferguson, G G, Eliasziw, M, Barr, H W, et al. The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial: surgical results in 1415 patients. Stroke. 1999; 30:1751–8.Google Scholar

Chaturvedi, S, Aggarwal, R, Murugappan, A. Results of carotid endarterectomy with prospective neurologist follow-up. Neurology. 2000; 26:55:769–72.Google Scholar

Spencer, M P. Transcranial Doppler monitoring and causes of stroke from carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 1997; 28:685–91.Google Scholar

Huibers, A, Calvet, D, Kennedy, F, et al. Mechanism of procedural stroke following carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting within the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015; doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.05.017. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar

Sundt, T M. The ischemic tolerance of neural tissue and the need for monitoring and selective shunting during carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 1983; 14:93–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sharbrough, F M, Messik, J M, Sundt, T M. Correlation of continuous electroencephalograms with cerebral blood flow measurements during carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 1973; 4:674–83.Google Scholar

Blackshear, W M, Di Carlo, V, Seifert, K B, Connar, R G. Advantages of continuous electroencephalographic monitoring during carotid surgery. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1986; 27:146–53.Google Scholar

Cho, I, Smullens, S N, Streletz, L J, Fariello, R G. The value of intraoperative EEG monitoring during carotid endarterectomy. Ann Neurol. 1986; 20:508–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Blume, W T, Ferguson, G G, McNeil, D K. Significance of EEG changes at carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 1986; 17:891–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McCarthy, W J, Park, A E, Koushanpour, E, et al. Carotid endarterectomy. Lessons from intraoprative monitoring – a decade of experience. Ann Surg. 1996; 224:291–307.Google Scholar

Balotta, E, Daigau, G, Saladini, M, et al. Results of electroencephalographic monitoring during 369 consecutive carotid artery revascularizations. Eur Neurol. 1997; 37:43–7.Google Scholar

Kearse, L A, Brown, E N, McPeck, K. Somatosensory evoked potential sensitivity relative to electroencephalography for cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 1992; 23:498–505.Google Scholar

Haupt, W F, Horsch, S. Evoked potential monitoring in carotid surgery: A review of 994 cases. Neurology. 1992; 42:835–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Duncan, L A, Ruckley, C V, Wildsmith, J A W. Cerebral oximetry: a useful monitor during carotid artery surgery. Anesthesiology. 1995; 50:1041–5.Google Scholar

Samra, S K, Dorje, P, Zelenock, G B, Stanley, J C. Cerebral oximetry in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy under regional anesthesia. Stroke. 1996; 27:49–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cherry, K J, Roland, C F, Hallett, J W, et al. Stump pressure, the contralateral carotid artery, and electroencephalographic changes. Am J Surg. 1991; 162:185–9.Google Scholar

Harada, R N, Comerota, A J, Good, G M, et al. Stump pressure, electroencephalographic changes, and the contralateral carotid artery: another look at selective shunting. Am J Surg. 1995; 170:148–53.Google Scholar

Benjamin, M E, Silva, M B, Watt, C, et al. Awake patient monitoring to determine the need for shunting during carotid endarterectomy. Surgery. 1993; 114:673–81.Google ScholarPubMed

Padayachee, T S, Bishop, C C R, Gosling, R G, et al. Monitoring middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity during carotid endarterectomy. Br J Surg. 1986; 73:98–100.Google Scholar

Steiger, H J, Schaffler, L, Boll, J, Liechti, S. Results of microsurgical carotid endarterectomy: a prospective study with transcranial Doppler and EEG monitoring, and selective shunting. Acta Neurochir. 1989; 100:31–8.Google Scholar

Spencer, M P, Thomas, G I, Nicholls, S C, Sauvage, L R. Detection of middle cerebral artery emboli during carotid endarterectomy using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. Stroke. 1990; 21:415–23.Google Scholar

Ackerstaff, R G A, Janes, C, Moll, F L, et al. The significance of emboli detection by means of transcranial Doppler ultrasonography monitoring in carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 1995; 21:415–23.Google Scholar

Canthelmo, N L, Babikian, V L, Samaraweera, R N, et al. Cerebral microembolism and ischemic changes associated with carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 1998; 27:1024–31.Google Scholar

Arnold, M, Sturzenegger, M, Schaffler, L, Seiler, R. Continuous intraoperative monitoring of middle cerebral artery flow velocities and electroencephalography during carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 1997; 28:1345–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Spencer, M P. Transcranial Doppler monitoring and causes of stroke from carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 1997; 28:685–91.Google Scholar

Jansen, C, Ramos, L M, van Heesewijk, J P, et al. Impact of microembolism and hemodynamic changes in the brain during carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 1994; 25:992–7.Google Scholar

Ackerstaff, R G, Moons, K G, van de Vlasakker, C J, et al. Association of intraoperative transcranial Doppler monitoring variables with stroke from carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 2000; 31:1817–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Babikian, V L, Canthelmo, N L. Cerebrovascular monitoring during carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 2000; 31:1799–801.Google Scholar

Levy, C R, O’Malley, H M, Fell, G, et al. Transcranial Doppler detected cerebral microembolism following carotid endarterectomy. High intensity signal loads predict postoperative cerebral ischemia. Brain. 1997; 120:621–9.Google Scholar

Kaposzta, Z, Baskerville, P A, Madge, D, et al. L-arginine and S-nitrosoglutathione reduce embolization in humans. Circulation. 2001; 103:2371–5.Google Scholar

Chen, C I, Iguchi, Y, Garami, Z, et al. Analysis of emboli during carotid stenting with distal protection device. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006; 21(4):223–8.Google Scholar

Zhou, W, Hitchner, E, Gillis, K, et al. Prospective neurocognitive evaluation of patients undergoing carotid interventions. J Vasc Surg. 2012; 56:1571–8.Google Scholar

Garami, Z, Lumsden, A B. Intra-operative and peri-procedural TCD monitoring. In Alexandrov, A V (ed). Cerebrovascular Ultrasound in Stroke Prevention and Treatment (2nd edn). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell Publishers. 2011.Google Scholar

Garami, Z, Charlton-Ouw, K M, Broadbent, K C, Lumsden, A B. A practical guide to transcranial Doppler monitoring during carotid interventions. Part 1: basics and blood flow changes. Vascular Ultrasound Today. 2008; 13(1).Google Scholar

Gupta, N, Corriere, M A, Dodson, T F, et al. Incidence of microemboli to the brain is less with endarterectomy than with percutaneous revascularization with distal filters or flow reversal. J Vasc Surg. 2011; 53:316–22.Google Scholar

Pennekamp, C W, Moll, F L, De Borst, G J. Role of transcranial Doppler in cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2012; 53:765–71.Google Scholar