Book contents
- Trust in Early Modern International Political Thought, 1598–1713
- Ideas in Context
- Trust in Early Modern International Political Thought, 1598–1713
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Alberico Gentili (1552–1608)
- Chapter 2 Plans For Universal Peace in Europe – The Limits of a Balance of Power
- Chapter 3 Jus Naturae Et Gentium – The Limits of a Juridical Order
- Chapter 4 The Struggle for Hegemony and the Erosion of Trust
- Chapter 5 The Doux Commerce and Interstate Relations
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- Ideas in Context
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 March 2017
Book contents
- Trust in Early Modern International Political Thought, 1598–1713
- Ideas in Context
- Trust in Early Modern International Political Thought, 1598–1713
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Alberico Gentili (1552–1608)
- Chapter 2 Plans For Universal Peace in Europe – The Limits of a Balance of Power
- Chapter 3 Jus Naturae Et Gentium – The Limits of a Juridical Order
- Chapter 4 The Struggle for Hegemony and the Erosion of Trust
- Chapter 5 The Doux Commerce and Interstate Relations
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- Ideas in Context
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Trust in Early Modern International Political Thought, 1598–1713 , pp. 227 - 266Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Primary Sources
Letters Barbeyrac to Le Clerc (Berlin, 10 April 1706). University Library Amsterdam (C 3); Barbeyrac to Locke (undated; 6.1. 1703; 26.7. 1704). Bodleian Library Oxford (MS Locke c.3).Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Abbé de, Mably, Le Droit public de l'Europe. Fondé sur les Traitez conclus jusqu'en l'année 1740 (Amsterdam 1748).Google Scholar
Abbé de Saint-Pierre, C. I. C., Projet pour rendre la Paix perpétuelle en Europe (Utrecht 1713).Google Scholar
Abbé de Saint-Pierre, C. I. C., A Project for Settling an Everlasting Peace in Europe First Proposed by Henry IV of France, and Approved of by Queen Elizabeth, and Now Discussed at Large and Made Practicable by the Abbot St. Pierre (London 1714).Google Scholar
Abbé de Saint-Pierre, C. I. C., Projet de Traité pour rendre la paix perpétuelle entre les Souverains chrétiens, pour maintenir toujours le commerce libre entre les nations, pour affirmer beaucoup davantage les maisons souveraines sur le trône. Proposé autrefois par Henry le Grand, roi de France, agréé par la reine Elisabeth, par Jaques Ier, roi d'Angleterre, son successeur et la plupart des autres potentats d'Europe (Utrecht 1717).Google Scholar
Abbé de Saint-Pierre, C. I. C., Mémoire pour diminuer le nombre des procès (Paris 1725).Google Scholar
Abbé de Saint-Pierre, C. I. C., Ouvrages de moral et de politique (Rotterdam 1729–1741).Google Scholar
Abbé de Saint-Pierre, C. I. C., Selections from the second edition of the Abrégé du Projet de Paix Perpétuelle by C. I. Castel de Saint-Pierre, translated by Bellot, H. Hale (London 1927).Google Scholar
Abbé de Saint-Pierre, C. I. C., Projet pour rendre la Paix perpétuelle en Europe [Utrecht 1713], ed. by Goyard-Fabre, S. (Paris 1981).Google Scholar
Abbé de Saint-Pierre, C. I. C., An Abridged Version of the Project for Perpetual Peace, ed. Pace, Roderick (Malta 2008).Google Scholar
Anonymous, Discours contre les Huguenotz, auquel est contenue et déclarée la source de leur damnable religion (Lyon 1573).Google Scholar
Anonymous, De furoribus Gallicis, horrenda et indigna amirallij Castillionei, nobilium atque illustrium virorum caede … (Basle 1573).Google Scholar
Anonymous, Remonstrance d'un bon Catholique françois aux trois estats de France (1576).Google Scholar
Anonymous, Les Affaires qui sont aujourd'huy entre les Maisons de France et d'Austriche (1649).Google Scholar
Anonymous [i.e. Lisola, J. P. F.], La France démasquée, ou ses irrégularitez dans sa conduite et maximes (La Haye 1670).Google Scholar
Anonymous [i.e. Lisola, J. P. F.], La France politique ou ses desseins executez et à executer sur le plan des passez; projettez en pleine Paix contre l'Espagne au Pays-bas & ailleurs (Charle-Ville 1671).Google Scholar
Anonymous, Appel de l'Angleterre touchant la secrete Cabale ou Assemblée à Withael (Amsterdam 1673).Google Scholar
Anonymous [i.e. Jurieu, P.], La Politique de Clergé de France, ou Entretiens curieux de deux Catholiques Romains (…) sur les moyens dont on se sert aujourd'huy, pour destruire la Religion Protestante dans ce Royaume (Cologne 1681).Google Scholar
Anonymous, The deplorable state and condition of the poor French Protestants commiserated, and humbly represented to all Princes and People of the true Reformed Church with Reasons for a Protestant League (London 1681).Google Scholar
Anonymous, The Designs of France against England and Holland discovered, or, The intrigues of that Crown for the utter ruine of both those Nations, laid open (London 1686).Google Scholar
Anonymous, The Means to Free Europe from the French Usurpation and the Advantages which the Union of the Christian Princes Has Produced, to Preserve it from the Power of an Anti-Christian Prince (London 1689).Google Scholar
Anonymous, The Spirit of France and the Politick Maxims of Lewix XIV. Laid open to the World (London 1689).Google Scholar
Anonymous, Europäischer Staats-Rath, Oder Gründlicher Bericht Wie sich Die Hohen Potentaten in Europa Gegen Die Monarchische Einbildungen des Königes in Franckreich zu verhalten haben (1690).Google Scholar
Anonymous, Offenhertziges Schreiben Eines Anonymi An einen Anonymum, Von der Wahren Ursache und Beschaffenheit des jetzigen verwirreten Zustandes in Europa (1704).Google Scholar
Anonymous, Europe a Slave, Unless England Break Her Chains: Discovering the Grand Designs of the French-popish Party in England for Several Years Last Past (1706).Google Scholar
Anonymous, Les Soupirs de l'Europe a la vue du Projet de Paix, Contenu dans la Harangue de la Reine de la Grande-Bretagne a son Parlement, du 6/17 Juin 1712 (Amsterdam 1712).Google Scholar
Anonymous, Projet d'un nouveau système de l'Europe, préférable au système de l'équilibre entre la maison de France et celle d'Autriche (1745).Google Scholar
Anonymous, Allegresse chrestienne de l'heureux succes des guerres de ce royaume (Paris 1772).Google Scholar
Barbeyrac, J., “The Judgement of an Anonymous Writer on the Original of This Abridgement” in S. Pufendorf, The Whole Duty of Man, According to the Law of Nature, ed. by Hunter, I. and Saunders, D. (Indianapolis 2003), p. 267–305.Google Scholar
Barbeyrac, J., “Discourse on What Is Permitted by the Laws” in S. Pufendorf, The Whole Duty of Man, According to the Law of Nature, ed. by Hunter, I. and Saunders, D. (Indianapolis 2003), p. 307–330.Google Scholar
Barbeyrac, J., “Discourse on the Benefits Conferred by the Laws” in S. Pufendorf, The Whole Duty of Man, According to the Law of Nature, ed. by Hunter, I. and Saunders, D. (Indianapolis 2003), p. 331–360.Google Scholar
Bayle, P., Ce que c'est que la France toute catholique: sous le règne de Louis le Grand (1686).Google Scholar
Bayle, P., Various Thoughts on the Occasion of a Comet, ed. by Bartlett, R. C. (New York 2000).Google Scholar
Bayle, P., A Philosophical Commentary on these Words of the Gospel, Luke 14:23 “Compel Them to Come in that my House may be Full”, ed. by Kilcullen, J. and Kukathas, C. (Indianapolis 2005).Google Scholar
Baxter, R., Chapters from A Christian Directory or A Summ of Practical Theology and Cases of Conscience, ed. by Tawney, J. (London 1925).Google Scholar
Bellers, J., Some Reasons for an European State: Proposed to the Powers of Europe, by an Universal Guarantee, and an Annual Congress, Senate, Dyet, Or Parliament, to Settle Any Disputes about the Bounds and Rights of Princes and States Hereafter. With an Abstract of a Scheme Form'd by King Henry the Fourth of France, Upon the Same Subject. And Also, a Proposal for a General Council Or Convocation of All the Different Religious Perswasions in Christendom, (not to Dispute what They Differ About, But) to Settle the General Principles They Agree In: By which it Will Appear, that They May be Good Subjects and Neighbours, Tho' of Different Apprehensions of the Way to Heaven. In Order to Prevent Broils and War at Home, when Foreign Wars are Ended (London 1710).Google Scholar
Bellers, J., An Essay Towards the Improvement of Physick in twelve Proposals by which the Lives of many Thousands of the Rich, as well as of the Poor may be saved yearly (London 1714).Google Scholar
Béthune, P. de, The counsellor of estate: contayning the greatest and most remarkeable considerations seruing for the managing of publicke affaires : diuided into three parts : the first contaynes the meanes to settle an estate, the second the meanes to preserue it, and the third the meanes to encrease it written in French by one of the ancient counsellors to the most Christian kings, Henry the Fourth, and Lewis the Thirteenth, translated by E. G. (London 1634).Google Scholar
Béthune, P. de, Le Conseiller d'Estat, ou, Recueil des plus generales Considerations servant au maniment des Affaires publiques (Paris 1641).Google Scholar
Bodin, J., Six Books of the Commonwealth, translated and selected by Tooley, M. J. (Oxford 1967).Google Scholar
Bossuet, J.-B., Avertissement aux Protestants sur les lettres du ministre Jurieu contre l'Histoire des variations (Paris 1827).Google Scholar
Bossuet, J.-B., “Oraison funèbre de Messire Michel le Tellier [1686]” in Oraisons funèbres panégyriques, ed. by Velat, l'abbé B. (Paris 1936).Google Scholar
Bossuet, J.-B., Politics drawn from Holy Scripture, ed. by Riley, P. (Cambridge 1999).Google Scholar
Brutus, S. J., Vindiciae contra Tyrannos or, concerning the legitimate power of a prince over the people, and of the people over a prince, ed. and translated by Garnett, G. (Cambridge 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camden, W., The History of the Most Renowned and Victorious Princess Elizabeth late Queen of England (London 1688).Google Scholar
Campanella, T., A Discourse Touching the Spanish Monarchy: Laying Down Directions and Practices Whereby the King of Spain May Attain to an Universal Monarchy (London 1658).Google Scholar
Chalmers, G., A Collection of Treaties between Great Britain and other Powers, 2 vols. (London 1790).Google Scholar
Chesne, L. du, Exhortation au Roy, pour vertueusement poursuivre ce que sagement il a commencé contre les Huguenots, avec les Epitaphes de Gaspar de Colligny (Paris 1572).Google Scholar
Crucé, E., The New Cyneas or Discourse of the Occasions and Means to Establish a General Peace, and the Liberty of Commerce throughout the whole World, ed. and translated by Balch, T. (Philadelphia 1909).Google Scholar
D'Avenant, C., “Essay upon the Probable Methods of Making a People Gainers in the Balance of Power” in The Political and Commercial Works of the Celebrated Writer Charles D'Avenant vol. 2, ed. by Whitworth, C. (London 1721), p. 163–382.Google Scholar
D'Avenant, C., An Essay upon Universal Monarchy. Written in the Year 1701 (London 1756).Google Scholar
Dickmann, F. (ed.), Geschichte in Quellen. Renaissance, Glaubenskämpfe, Absolutismus (Munich 1982).Google Scholar
Djohôre, Bokhari de, Makôta Radja-Râdja ou la Couronne des Rois, translated from Malais by Marre, A. (Paris 1878).Google Scholar
DuBos, J. B., Les interets de l'Angleterre, mal entendus dans la guerre presente. Traduits du livre anglois, intitule ‘Englands interest mistaken in the present War’ (Amsterdam 1704).Google Scholar
Erasmus, D., The Complaint of Peace: to which is added Antipolemus; or the Plea of Reason, Religion, and Humanity against War (Burlington 1813).Google Scholar
Fléchier, V. E., “Oraison funébre de Messier Michel Le Tellier [1686]” in Recueil de diverses oraisons funèbres, harangues, discours, & autres Pieces d' Eloquence des plus celebres Auteurs de ce tems (L'Isle 1691), p. 487–520.Google Scholar
Fletcher, A., “A Discourse concerning the Affairs of Spain” in Fletcher, A., Political Works, ed. by Robertson, J. (Cambridge 1997), p. 83–117.Google Scholar
Fletcher, A., “A Discourse of Government with Relations to Melitia” in Fletcher, A., Political Works, ed. by Robertson, J. (Cambridge 1997), p. 1–31.Google Scholar
Freschot, C., The compleat History of the Peace of Utrecht as also that of Gertruydenberg: Containing All the Acts, Memorials, Representations, Complaints, Demands, Letters, Speeches, Treaties and other Authentick Pieces relating to the Negotiations there, 2 vols. (London 1715).Google Scholar
Gentili, A., Hispanicae Advocationis Libri Duo, translated by Abbott, F. Frost (Oxford 1921).Google Scholar
Gentili, A., The Wars of the Romans A Critical Edition and Translation of De armis Romanis, ed. by Kingsbury, B. and Straumann, B., translated by Lupher, D. (Oxford 2011).Google Scholar
Glafey, A. F., Vollständige Geschichte des Rechts der Vernunfft, worinnen in dieser Wissenschaft ans Licht getretenen Schriften nach ihrem Inhalt und wahren Werth beurtheilet (Leipzig 1739).Google Scholar
Grotius, H., Le Droit de la Guerre et de la Paix [nouvelle Traduction par Jean Barbeyrac] (Amsterdam 1724).Google Scholar
Grotius, H., Commentary on the Law of Prize and Booty, ed. by Ittersum, M. J. v. (Indianapolis 2006).Google Scholar
Gundling, N. H., “Ob wegen der anwachsenden Macht der Nachbarn man den Degen entblössen könne” in Gundlingiana, Darinnen allerhand zur Jurisprudenz, Philosophie, Historie, Critic, Litteratur und übrigen Gelehrsamkeit gehörige Sachen abgehandelt werden (Halle 1716), p. 379–416.Google Scholar
Harrington, J., “A Discourse upon this Saying: The Spirit of the Nation is not yet to be Trusted with Liberty; lest it Introduce Monarchy, or Invade the Liberty of Conscience” in The Political Works of James Harrington vol. II, ed. by Pocock, J. G. A. (Cambridge 1977), p. 735–745.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., Elements of the Philosophy of Right, ed. by Wood, A. W. and translated by Nisbet, H. B. (Cambridge 1998).Google Scholar
Hobbes, T., “A Dialogue between a Philosopher and a Student of the Common Laws of England” in The English Works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury vol. VI, ed. by Molesworth, W. (London 1890), p. 1–160.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T., Behemoth or the Long Parliament, ed. by Tönnies, F. (Chicago 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, T., On the Citizen, ed. by Tuck, R. and translated by Silverthorne, M. (Cambridge 1998).Google Scholar
Hume, D., “Of the Balance of Power” in Political Essays, ed. by Haakonssen, K. (Cambridge 1994), p. 154–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahle, L. M., La balance de l'Europe considerée comme la regle de la paix et de la guerre (Berlin, Göttingen 1744).Google Scholar
Kant, I., “On the Common Saying: That might be Correct in Theory, but it is of no use in Practice” in The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Practical Philosophy, ed. by Gregor, M. J. (Cambridge 1996), p. 273–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I., “The Metaphysics of Morals” in The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Practical Philosophy, ed. by Gregor, M. J. (Cambridge 1996), p. 363–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I., “Toward Perpetual Peace” in The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Practical Philosophy, ed. by Gregor, M. J. (Cambridge 1996), p. 315–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., Lettres et Opuscules inédites, ed. by de Careil, A. Foucher (Paris 1854).Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., “Bedenken, welcher Gestalt Securitas publica interna et externa und status praesens im Reich auf festen Fuß zu stellen” in G. W. Leibniz Politische Schriften vol. 1, ed. by der Wissenschaften, Preussische Akademie (Darmstadt 1931), p. 133–214.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., Textes inédits d'après les manuscrits de la bibliothèque provinciale de Hanovre, ed. by Grua, G. (Paris 1948).Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., Discourse on Metaphysics, translated by Montgomery, G. R. (La Salle 1973).Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., “Mars Christianissimus Autore Germano Gallo-Graeco ou Apologie des Armes du Roi très Chrestien contre les Chrestiens” G. W. Leibniz Politische Schriften vol. 2, ed. by Wissenschaften der, Akademie der DDR (Berlin 1984), p. 447–502.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., “Reflexions on the work that Mr Hobbes published in English on ‘Freedom, Necessity and Chance’” in Theodicy, ed. by Farrer, A. (La Salle 1985).Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., “Mars Christianissimus” [1683] in G. W. Leibniz' Political Writings, translated by Riley, P. (Cambridge 1988), p. 121–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., “Codex Iuris Gentium (Praefatio)” [1693] in G. W. Leibniz' Political Writings, ed. by Riley, P. (Cambridge 1988), p. 165–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., “Meditation on the Common Concept of Justice” in G. W. Leibniz' Political Writings, ed. by Riley, P. (Cambridge 1988), p. 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., “Observations on the Abbé de Saint-Pierre's ‘Project for Perpetual Peace’” in G.W. Leibniz' Political Writings, ed. by Riley, P. (Cambridge 1988), p. 176–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., “Caeserinus Fürstenerius” [selection] in G. W. Leibniz' Political Writings, ed. by Riley, P. (Cambridge 1988), p. 111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., Philosophical Papers and Letters, ed. and translated by Loemker, L. E. (Dordrecht 1989).Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., “Letter to Thomas Hobbes” [1670] in Philosophical Papers and Letters, ed. and translated by Loemker, L. E. (Dordrecht 1989), p. 105–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., Theodicy. Essays on the Goodness of God the Freedom of Man and the Origin of Evil, ed. and translated by Huggard, E. M. (La Salle 1990).Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., “Praefatio codicis juris gentium diplomatici” in G. W. Leibniz Politische Schriften vol. 5, ed. by Potsdam, Leibniz-Editionsstelle (Berlin 2004), p. 48–79.Google Scholar
Lipsius, J., Politica. Six Books of Politics or Political Instruction, ed. and translated by Waszink, J. (Amsterdam 2002).Google Scholar
Lisola, F. P. Freiherr v., Le Bouclier d'estat et de justice, contre le dessein manifestement découvert de la Monarchie Universelle, sous le vain prétexte des prétentions de la reyne de France (1667).Google Scholar
Lisola, F. P. Freiherr v., Lettres et autres pièces curieuses sur les affaires du temps (Amsterdam 1672).Google Scholar
Lisola, F. P. Freiherr v., The Buckler of State and Justice Against the Design Manifestly Discovered of the Universal Monarchy Under the Vain Pretext of the Queen of France, Her Pretensions. (London 1673).Google Scholar
Lisola, F. P. Freiherr v., Le Politique du temps par F.-P. de Lisola, avec les remarques nécessaires à sa parfaite intelligence, et une dissertation historique et politique sur l'estat présent de la chrétienté, à quoy on a joint une table des remarques, très curieuse et très commode pour trouver les belles matières qu'elles contiennent (1674).Google Scholar
Locke, J., “A Letter Concerning Toleration” in John Locke A Letter Concerning Toleration, ed. by Horton, J. and Mendus, S. (London, New York 1991), p. 12–56.Google Scholar
Malynes, G. de, Consuetudo, vel Lex Mercatoria or the Antient Law-Merchant (London 1629).Google Scholar
Mandeville, B., Free Thoughts on Religion, the Church, and National Happiness (London 1729).Google Scholar
Manley, T., The Present State of Europe briefly examined and found languishing, Occasioned by the Greatness of the French Monarchy: for Cure whereof, a Remedy (From former Examples) is humbly proposed … (London 1689).Google Scholar
Meiern, J. G. v., Acta pacis Westphalicae publica oder Westphälische Friedens-Handlungen und Geschichte, Erster Theil (Hanover 1734).Google Scholar
Montaigne, M. de, The Complete Essays, ed. and translated by Screech, M. A. (London 1991).Google Scholar
Montesquieu, C. and de Secondat, Baron de, Réflexions sur la monarchie universelle en Europe, in Oeuvres Complètes, vol. 2, ed. by Caillois, R. (Paris 1951), p. 19–38.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, C. and de Secondat, Baron de, The Spirit of the Laws, ed. by Cohler, A., Miller, B. and Stone, H. (Cambridge 1999).Google Scholar
Mornay, P. de, “Discours au Roy Herny III sur les moyens de diminuer l'Espagnol” in Memoires de Messire Philippes de Mornay (Paris 1624), p. 270–280.Google Scholar
Moser, J. J., Grundsätze des jetzt üblichen Europäischen Völkerrechts in Friedens-Zeiten: auch anderer unter denen Europäischen Souverainen und Nationen zu solcher Zeit fürkommender willkürlicher Handlungen (Hanau 1750).Google Scholar
Mun, T., England's Treasure by Forraign Trade [London 1664] in A Select Collection of Early English Tracts on Commerce (London 1856), p. 115–209.Google Scholar
Naudé, G., Science des princes ou considérations politiques sur les coups d'état (1667).Google Scholar
Nouvell, C., Ode trionfale au roy, sus l'equitable justice que sa majesté feit des rebelles, la veille et jour de sainct Loys (Paris 1572).Google Scholar
Pachner, J. J. von Eggenstorf, Vollständige Sammlung aller von Anfang des noch fürwährenden Teutschen Reichs-Tags de anno 1663 biss andero abgefassten Reichsschlüsse (Regensburg 1740–1776).Google Scholar
Penn, W., “An Essay towards the Present and Future Peace of Europe by Establishment of an European Dyet, Parliament, or Estates (1693)” in The Political Writings of William Penn, ed. by Murphy, A. R. (Indianapolis 2002), p. 401–419.Google Scholar
Plato, , Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Meno, Phaedo, ed. and translated by Fowler, H. N. (Cambridge, Mass. 2005).Google Scholar
Prynne, W., Thomas Campanella, an Italian Friar and Second Machiavel, His Advice to the King of Spain for Attaining the Universal Monarchy of the World (London 1660).Google Scholar
Pufendorf, S., “De systematibus civitatum” in Dissertationes academicae selectiores… (Lund 1675), p. 264–330.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, S., Of the Law of Nature and Nations, ed. and translated by Kennet, B. (London 1717).Google Scholar
Pufendorf, S., “De Statu Hominum Naturali/On the Natural State of Men” in Samuel Pufendorf's On the Natural State of Men, ed. and translated by Seidler, M. (Lewiston 1990), p. 107–136.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, S., The Political Writings of Samuel Pufendorf, ed. by Carr, C. L. and translated by Seidler, M. (Oxford 1994).Google Scholar
Pufendorf, S., Of the Nature and Qualification of Religion to Civil Society, ed. by Zurbuchen, S. (Indianapolis 2002).Google Scholar
Pufendorf, S., The Present State of Germany, ed. by Seidler, M. J., (Indianapolis 2007).Google Scholar
Pufendorf, S., Two Books of the Elements of Universal Jurisprudence, ed. by Behme, T. (Indianapolis 2009).Google Scholar
Pufendorf, S., An Introduction to the History of the Principal Kingdoms and States of Europe, ed. by Seidler, M. J. (Indianapolis 2013).Google Scholar
Rachel, S., Dissertations on The Law of Nature and of Nations, ed. and translated by Bate, J. P. (Washington 1916).Google Scholar
Ribadeneyra, P., Religion and the Virtues of the Christian Prince against Machiavelli, ed. by Moore, G. A. (Maryland 1949).Google Scholar
Robinet, A. (ed.), Correspondance G. W. Leibniz / Ch. I. Castel de Saint-Pierre éditée intégralement selon les manuscrits inédits des bibliothèques d'Hanovre et Göttingen (Paris 1995).Google Scholar
Rohan, H., A Treatise of the Interest of Princes and States of Christendome, translated by H[enry] H[unt] (London 1641).Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J., A Project for Perpetual Peace. By J. J. Rousseau [or rather, abridged by him from the “Projet de paix perpétuelle” of the Abbé de Saint-Pierre] … Translated from the French, with a preface by the translator (London 1761).Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J., “Extrait du Projet de Paix Perpétuelle de Monsieur l'Abbé de Saint-Pierre” in Rousseau, J.-J., Œuvres complètes vol. III (Paris 1964), p. 563–589.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J., “Jugement sur le Projet de Paix Perpétuelle” in Rousseau, J.-J., Œuvres complètes vol. III (Paris 1964), p. 591–600.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J., “The Social Contract” in Rousseau, J.-J., The Social Contract and other Later Political Writings, ed. by Gourevitch, V. (Cambridge 2003), p. 39–161.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J., “The State of War” in Rousseau, J.-J., The Social Contract and other Later Political Writings, ed. by Gourevitch, V. (Cambridge 2003), p. 162–176.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J., The Plan for Perpetual Peace, On the Government of Poland, and Other Writings on History and Politics, ed. by Kelly, C. (Dartmouth 2005).Google Scholar
Savary, J., Le parfait Négociant ou Instruction générale pour ce qui regarde le Commerce (Paris 1679).Google Scholar
Smith, A., The Theory of Moral Sentiments, ed. by Raphael, D. D. and Macfie, A. L. (Oxford 1976).Google Scholar
Sorel, C., La bibliothèque françoise, ou le choix et l'examen des livres françois qui traitent de l'éloquence, de la philosophie, de la dévotion et de la conduite des moeurs (Paris 1667).Google Scholar
Steuart, J., Inquiry into the Principles of Political Oeconomy vol. II, ed. by Skinner, A. S. (Edinburgh 1966).Google Scholar
Suárez, F., “De Legibus, ac Deo Legislatore” in Selection from Three Works of Francisco Suárez vol. I, ed. by Scott, J. B. (Oxford 1944), p. 1–865.Google Scholar
Suárez, F., “On the Laws and God the Lawgiver” in Selection from Three Works of Francisco Suárez vol. II, ed. by Scott, J. B. (Oxford 1944), p. 1–646.Google Scholar
Sully, Maximilien de Béthune, Duke of, The Memoirs of the Duke of Sully during his Residence at the English Court; to which he was sent Ambassador from Henry IV. Of France, upon the Accession of King James the First. Containing An Account of his Negotiations (…) Also A Relation of the Political Scheme, commonly called the Great Design of Henry IV (…) (Dublin 1751).Google Scholar
Sully, Maximilien de Béthune, Mémoires de Maximilien de Béthune, Duc de Sully, Ministre de Henri IV (…), 10 vols. (London 1778).Google Scholar
Thomasius, C., Vollständige Erläuterung der Kirchenrechtsgelahrtheit Gründliche Abhandlung vom Verhältnis der Religion gegen den Staat (Franckfurth, Leipzig 1740).Google Scholar
Thomasius, C., “On the History of Natural Law until Grotius” in Thomasius, C., Essays on Church, State and Politics, ed. by Hunter, I. et al. (Indianapolis 2007), p. 1–48.Google Scholar
Trenchard, J. and Gordon, T., Cato's Letters: or, Essays on Liberty, Civil and Religious, and other important Subjects, ed. by Hamowy, R. (Indianapolis 1995).Google Scholar
Vattel, E. de, The Law of Nations, ed. by Kapossy, B. and Whatmore, R. (Indianapolis 2008).Google Scholar
Vitoria, F. de, “On the American Indians” in Vitoria Political Writings, ed. by Pagden, A. and Lawrence, J. (Cambridge 2003), p. 233–292.Google Scholar
Voltaire [François-Marie Arouet], The Age of Louis XIV: To which is added, an abstract of The Age of Louis XV (London 1779).Google Scholar
Voltaire [François-Marie Arouet], “De la Paix perpétuelle” in Oeuvres complètes vol. 23 (Paris 1828), p. 25–56.Google Scholar
Zedler, J. H. (ed.), Großes vollständiges Universal-Lexikon aller Wissenschaften und Künste (Leipzig, Halle 1735–1745).Google Scholar
Zouche, R., An Exposition of Fecial Law and Procedure or of Law Between Nations and Questions Concerning the same, ed. by Bierly, J. L. (Washington 1911).Google Scholar
Ahnert, T., “The Prince and the Church in the Thought of Christian Thomasius” in Natural Law and Civil Sovereignty, ed. by Hunter, I. and Saunders, D. (Houndmills 2002), p. 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aksan, V. and Goffman, D. (eds.), The Early Modern Ottomans: Remapping the Empire (Cambridge 2007).Google Scholar
Ammicht Quinn, R., “Trust Generating Security Generating Trust: An Ethical Perspective on a Secularized Discourse” in Behemoth. A Journal on Civilisation 8 (2015), p. 109–125.Google Scholar
Anghie, A., Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law (Cambridge 2004).Google Scholar
Appleby, J. O., Economic Thought and Ideology in Seventeenth-Century England (Princeton 1978).Google Scholar
Arcidiacono, B., Cinq types de paix. Une histoire des plans de pacification perpétuelle (Paris 2011).Google Scholar
Aretin, K. O. Freiherr von, “Das Reich in seiner letzten Phase 1648–1806” in Das Reich, ed. by Aretin, K. O. Freiherr von (Stuttgart 1986), p. 19–51.Google Scholar
Aretin, K. O. Freiherr von, “Reichssystem, Friedensgarantie und europäisches Gleichgewicht” in Das Reich, ed. by Aretin, K. O. Freiherr von (Stuttgart 1986), p. 55–75.Google Scholar
Armitage, D., “Hobbes and the Foundations of Modern International Thought” in Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought, ed. by Brett, A. and Tully, J. (Cambridge 2006), p. 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armitage, D., “John Locke, Carolina and the Two Treatise of Government” in Foundations of Modern International Thought, ed. by Armitage, D. (Cambridge 2013), p. 90–113.Google Scholar
Armitage, D., “Globalising Jeremy Bentham” in Foundations of Modern International Thought, ed. by Armitage, D. (Cambridge 2013), p. 172–187.Google Scholar
Asbach, O., “Politik und Frieden beim Abbé de Saint-Pierre. Erinnerung an einen (fast) vergessenen Kalssiker der politischen Philosophie” in Politisches Denken Jahrbuch 1995/96 (Stuttgart 1996), p. 133–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asbach, O, “Internationaler Naturzustand und Ewiger Friede. Die Begründung einer rechtlichen Ordnung zwischen Staaten bei Rousseau und Kant” in Recht, Staat und Völkerrecht bei Immanuel Kant, ed. by Hüning, D. and Tuschling, B. (Berlin 1998), p. 203–232.Google Scholar
Asbach, O, “Die Reichsverfassung als föderativer Staatenbund. Das Alte Reich in der politischen Philospohie des Abbé de Saint-Pierre and Jean-Jacques Rousseau” in Altes Reich, Frankreich und Europa. Politische, philosophische und historische Aspekte des französischen Deutschlandbildes im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert, ed. by Asbach, O. et al. (Berlin 2001), p. 171–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asbach, O, “Zwischen Souveränität und Föderation. Moderne Staatlichkeit und die Ordnung Europas beim Abbé de Saint-Pierre und Jean-Jacques Rousseau” in Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 11 (2001), p. 1073–1099.Google Scholar
Asbach, O, Die Zähmung der Leviathane. Die Idee einer Rechtsordnung zwischen Staaten bei Abbé de Saint-Pierre und Jean-Jacques Rousseau (Berlin 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asbach, O, “Staat, Politik und die Verfassung der Freiheit. Zu den Anfängen des republikanischen Verfassungsdenkens in der französischen Aufklärung” in Der Staat 42 (2003), p. 1–34.Google Scholar
Asbach, O, Staat und Politik zwischen Absolutismus und Aufklärung. Der Abbé de Saint-Pierre und die Herausbildung der französischen Aufklärung bis zur Mitte des 18. Jahrhunderts (Hildesheim 2005).Google Scholar
Asbach, O, Europa – Vom Mythos zur Imagined Community?: Zur historischen Semantik ‘Europas’ von der Antike bis ins 17. Jahrhundert (Hanover 2010).Google Scholar
Asbach, O. (ed.), Der moderne Staat und ‘le doux commerce’. Politik, Ökonomie und internationale Beziehungen im politischen Denken der Aufklärung (Baden-Baden 2014).Google Scholar
Asbach, O. and Hüning, D., “Naturzustand und Rechtsbegründung. Der Abbé de Saint-Pierre zwischen Hobbes und Rousseau” in Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 84 (1998), p. 307–325.Google Scholar
Asbach, O. and Schröder, P. (eds.), War, the State and International Law in Seventeenth Century Europe (Farnham 2010).Google Scholar
Ashworth, L. M., A History of International Thought (Abingdon, New York 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axtmann, R., “The State of the State: The Model of the Modern Nation State and its Contemporary Transformation” in International Political Science Review 25 (2004), p. 264–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, M. D., Honored by the Glory of Islam. Conversion and Conquest in Ottoman Europe (Oxford 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, T. W., Introduction to The New Cyneas of Éméric Crucé (Philadelphia 1909), p. III-XXXI.Google Scholar
Barlow, J., “The Fox and the Lion: Machiavelli replies to Cicero” in History of Political Thought 20 (1999), p. 627–645.Google Scholar
Basso, L., “Regeln einer effektiven Außenpolitik: Leibniz' Bemühen um eine Balance widerstreitender Machtinteressen in Europa” in Studia Leibnitiana 40/2 (2008), p. 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battista, A. M., “Sull'antimachiavellismo francese del secolo XVI” in Storia e Politica 1 (1962), p. 413–447.Google Scholar
Baumanns, M., Das publizistische Werk des kaiserlichen Diplomaten Franz Paul Freiherr von Lisola (1613–1674). Ein Beitrag zum Verhältnis von absolutisti-schem Staat, Öffentlichkeit und Mächtepolitik in der frühen Neuzeit (Berlin 1994).Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F. J., Radical Reactionaries: The Political Thought of the French Catholic League (Geneva 1975).Google Scholar
Behme, T., Samuel von Pufendorf: Naturrecht und Staat. Eine Analyse und Interpretation seiner Theorie, ihrer Grundlagen und Probleme (Göttingen 1995).Google Scholar
Behnen, M., “Der gerechte und notwendige Krieg. ‘Necessitas’ und ‘Utilitas reipublicae’ in der Kriegstheorie des 16. und 17. Jahrhunderts” in Staatsverfassung und Heeresverfassung in der europäischen Geschichte der frühen Neuzeit, ed. by Kunisch, J. and Stollberg-Rilinger, B. (Berlin 1986), p. 43–106.Google Scholar
Bély, L., (ed.), L'Europe des traités de Westphalie. Esprit de la diplomatie et diplomatie de l'esprit (Paris 2000).Google Scholar
Bély, L., L'art de la paix en Europe. Naissance de la diplomatie moderne XVIe – XVIIIe siècle (Paris 2007).Google Scholar
Bély, L., Les Secrets de Louis XIV Mystères d'État et pouvoir absolu (Paris 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bély, L., Haan, B. and Jettot, S. (eds.), La Paix des Pyrénées (1659) ou le triomphe de la raison politique (Paris 2015).Google Scholar
Benton, L., A Search for Sovereignty: Law and Geography in European Empires, 1400–1900 (Cambridge 2010).Google Scholar
Berman, H. J., Law and Revolution: The Foundation of the Western Legal Tradition (Cambridge, Mass. 1983).Google Scholar
Bernardo Ares, J. M. de, Luis XIV Rey de Espaňa. De los Imperios plurinacionales a los Estados unitarios (1665–1714) (Madrid 2008).Google Scholar
Besson, S. and Tasioulas, J. (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford 2010).Google Scholar
Birely, R., The Counter-Reformation Prince: Anti-Machiavellism or Catholic Statecraft in Early Modern Europe (London 1990).Google Scholar
Biskup, T., “A University for Empire? The University of Göttingen and the Personal Union, 1737–1837” in The Hanoverian Dimension in British History, 1714–1837, ed. by Simms, B. and Riotte, T. (Cambridge 2007), p. 128–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blane, A. and Kingsbury, B., “Punishment and the ius post bellum” in The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire, ed. by Kingsbury, B. and Straumann, B. (Oxford 2010), p. 241–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blin, A., 1648 – La Paix de Westphalie ou la naissance de l'Europe moderne (Paris 2006).Google Scholar
Blom, H. W., “Patriots, Contracts and other Patterns of Trust in a Polyarchic Society: the Dutch 17th century” in ‘Patria’ und ‘Patrioten’ vor dem Patriotismus. Pflichten, Rechte, Glauben und die Rekonfigurierung europäischer Gemeinwesen im 17. Jahrhundert, ed. by Friedeburg, R. v. (Wiesbaden 2005), p. 193–213.Google Scholar
Blom, H. W. (ed.), Property, Piracy and Punishment: Hugo Grotius on War and Booty in De Iure Praedae Concepts and Contexts (Leiden 2009).Google Scholar
Blom, H. W., “The Meaning of Trust: Fides between Self-interest and appetitus societas” in The Roots of International Law, ed. by Dupuy, P.-M. and Chetail, V. (Leiden 2014), p. 39–58.Google Scholar
Blom, H. W. and Winkel, L. C. (eds.), Grotius and the Stoa (Grotiana 22/23, Assen 2004).Google Scholar
Bluche, F., “Saint-Pierre” in Bluche, F., Dictionnaire du Grand Siècle (Paris 1990), p. 1396.Google Scholar
Boisen, C. and Boucher, D., “Hobbes and the Subjection of International Relations to Law and Morality” in International Political Theory after Hobbes: Analysis, Interpretation and Orientation, ed. by Prokhovnik, R. and Slomp, G. (Houndmills 2011), p. 81–101.Google Scholar
Bosbach, F., Monarchia Universalis. Ein politischer Leitbegriff der Frühen Neuzeit (Göttingen 1988).Google Scholar
Bossy, J., “The Counter Reformation and the People of Catholic Europe” in Past and Present 47 (1970), p. 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bots, H., (ed.), The Peace of Nijmegen 1676–1678/79. International Congress of the Tricentennial, Nijmegen, 14–16 September 1978 (Amsterdam 1980).Google Scholar
Boucher, D., “Resurrecting Pufendorf and Capturing the Westphalian Moment” in Review of International Studies 27 (2001), p. 557–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boutant, C., Histoire de Strasbourg des Origines à nos Jours. Tome III: Strasbourg de la Guerre de Trente ans à Napoléon 1618–1815, ed. by Livet, G. and Rapp, F. (Strasbourg 1981).Google Scholar
Boutant, C., L'Europe au grand tournant des années 1680. La succession palatine (Paris 1985).Google Scholar
Boyer, A., Chose Promise. Études sur la Promesse à partir de Hobbes et de quelques autres (Paris 2014).Google Scholar
Braubach, M., “Die Friedensverhandlungen in Utrecht und Rastadt 1712–1714” in Historisches Jahrbuch 90 (1970), p. 284–298.Google Scholar
Brett, A., “Natural Right and Civil Community: The Civil Philosophy of Hugo Grotius” in The Historical Journal 45 (2002), p. 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brieskorn, N. and Riedenauer, M. (eds.), Suche nach Frieden: Politische Ethik in der Frühen Neuzeit II (Stuttgart 2002).Google Scholar
Bryant, L. M., The King and the City in the Parisian Royal Entry Ceremony: Politics, Ritual and Art in the Renaissance (Geneva 1986).Google Scholar
Bull, H., Kingsbury, H. and Roberts, A. (eds.), Hugo Grotius and International Relations (Oxford 2002).Google Scholar
Burke, P., “Did Europe Exist before 1700?” in History of European Ideas 1 (1980), p. 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkhardt, J., “Der Dreißigjährige Krieg als frühmoderner Staatsbildungskrieg” in Geschichte in Wissenschaft und Unterricht 45 (1994), p. 487–499.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, J., “Die Friedlosigkeit der Frühen Neuzeit. Grundlegung einer Theorie der Bellizität Europas” in Zeitschrift für Historische Forschung 24 (1997), p. 509–574.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, J., “Wars of States or Wars of State-Formation?” in War, the State and International Law in Seventeenth-Century Europe, ed. by Asbach, O. and Schröder, P. (Farnham 2010), p. 17–34.Google Scholar
Bussmann, K. and Schilling, H. (eds.), 1648, War and Peace in Europe: Politics, Religion, Law, and Society (Münster 1998).Google Scholar
Cardascia, G., “Machiavell et Jean Bodin” in Bibliothèque d'Humanisme et Renaissance III (1943), p. 129–167.Google Scholar
Cardot, F., “La conscience européenne au XVe et au XVIe siècle” in Francia 8 (1980), p. 553–555.Google Scholar
Cattaneo, A., “Hobbes's Theory of Punishment” in Hobbes Studies, ed. by Brown, K. C. (Oxford 1965), p. 275–297.Google Scholar
Caws, P. (ed.), The Causes of Quarrel. Essays on Peace, War and Thomas Hobbes (Boston 1989).Google Scholar
Chaudhuri, K. N., The English East Indian Trading Company: The Study of an Early Joint-Stock Company 1600–1640 (London 1965).Google Scholar
Christov, T., Before Anarchy. Hobbes and His Critics in Modern International Thought (Cambridge 2015).Google Scholar
Çirakman, A., From the Terror of the World to the Sick Man of Europe. European images of Ottoman Empire and Society from the Sixteenth Century to the Nineteenth (Oxford 2002).Google Scholar
Clark, H. C. (ed.), Commerce, Culture, & Liberty. Readings on Capitalism before Adam Smith (Indianapolis 2003).Google Scholar
Claydon, T., “Protestantism, Universal Monarchy and Christendom in William's War Propaganda, 1689–1697” in Redefining William III: The Impact of the King-Stadholder in International Context, ed. by Mijers, E. and Onnekink, D. (Farnham 2007), p. 125–142.Google Scholar
Cole, M. H., The Portable Queen: Elizabeth I and the Politics of Ceremony (Amherst 1999).Google Scholar
Colish, M., “Cicero's De officiis and Machiavelli's Prince” in Sixteenth Century Journal 9 (1978), p. 80–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comfort, W. W., “William Penn's Religious Background” in The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography 68 (1944), p. 341–358.Google Scholar
Covell, C., The Law of Nations in Political Thought. A Critical Survey from Vitoria to Kant (Houndmills 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darricau, R., “Duplessis-Mornay” in Dictionnaire du Grand Siècle, ed. by Bluche, F. (Paris 1990), p. 509.Google Scholar
Daussy, H., Les Huguenots et le Roi. Le combat politique de Philippe Duplessis-Mornay (1572–1600) (Geneva 2002).Google Scholar
Defour, A., “Pufendorfs föderalistisches Denken und Staatsräsonlehre” in Samuel Pufendorf und die europäische Frühaufklärung, ed. by Palladini, F. and Hartung, G. (Berlin 1996), p. 105–122.Google Scholar
Dehio, L., Gleichgewicht oder Hegemonie. Betrachtungen über ein Grundproblem der neueren Staatengeschichte (1948).Google Scholar
Delanty, G., “The Frontier and Identities of Exclusion in European History” in History of European Ideas 22 (1996), p. 93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delhom, P., “Das Wagnis des Vertrauens” in Denkwege des Friedens Aporien und Perspektiven, ed. by Hirsch, A. and Delhom, P. (Freiburg, Munich 2007), p. 334–361.Google Scholar
Dickmann, F., “Krieg und Frieden im Völkerrecht der Frühen Neuzeit” in Friedensrecht und Friedenssicherung. Studien zum Friedensproblem in der neuen Geschichte, ed. by Dickmann, F. (Göttingen 1971), p. 116–139.Google Scholar
Dodge, G. H., The Political Theory of the Huguenots of the Dispersion. With special Reference to the Thought and Influence of Pierre Jurieu (New York 1922).Google Scholar
Döring, D., Pufendorf-Studien Beiträge zur Biographie Samuel von Pufendorfs und seiner Entwicklung als Historiker und theologischer Schriftsteller (Berlin 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döring, D., “Untersuchungen zur Entstehungsgeschichte der Reichsverfassungsschrift Samuel Pufendorfs” in Der Staat 33 (1994), p. 185–206.Google Scholar
Dreitzel, H., “Zehn Jahre ‘Patria’ in der politischen Theorie in Deutschland: Prasch, Pufendorf, Leibniz, Becher 1662 bis 1672” in Patria' und ‘Patrioten’ vor dem Patriotismus Pflichten, Rechte, Glauben und die Rekonfigurierung europäischer Gemeinwesen im 17. Jahrhundert, ed. by Friedeburg, R. v. (Wiesbaden 2005), p. 367–534.Google Scholar
Duchhardt, H., Gleichgewicht der Kräfte, Convenance, Europäisches Konzert. Friedenskongresse und Friedensschlüsse vom Zeitalter Ludwigs XIV. bis zum Wiener Kongreß (Darmstadt 1976).Google Scholar
Duchhardt, H. (ed.), Zwischenstaatliche Friedenswahrung in Mittelalter und Früher Neuzeit (Köln 1991).Google Scholar
Duchhardt, H., “Reich und europäisches Staatensystem seit dem Westfälischen Frieden” in Alternativen zur Reichsverfassung in der Frühen Neuzeit? ed. by Press, V. (Munich 1995), p. 179–187.Google Scholar
Duchhardt, H., “Das Reich in der Mitte des Staatensystems. Zum Verhältnis von innerer Verfassung und internationaler Funktion in den Wandlungen des 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts” in Das europäische Staatensystem im Wandel. Strukturelle Bedingungen und bewegende Kräfte seit der Frühen Neuzeit, ed. by Krüger, P. (Munich 1996), p. 1–9.Google Scholar
Duchhardt, H., Balance of Power und Pentarchie: Internationale Beziehungen 1700–1785 (Paderborn 1996).Google Scholar
Duchhardt, H. (ed.), Der Westfälische Friede. Diplomatie – politische Zäsur – kulturelles Umfeld – Rezeptionsgeschichte (Munich 1998).Google Scholar
Duchhardt, H. (ed.), La Paix de Westphalie: de l'événement européen au lieu européen de mémoire? (Sigmaringen 1999).Google Scholar
Duchhardt, H., “The Missing Balance” in Journal of the History of International Law 2 (2000), p. 67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchhardt, H. (ed.), Der Pyrenäenfriede 1659: Vorgeschichte, Widerhall, Rezeptionsgeschichte (Göttingen 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufour, A., “Pufendorfs föderalistisches Denken und die Staatsräsonlehre” in Samuel von Pufendorf und die europäische Frühaufklärung, ed. by Palladini, F. and Hartung, G. (Berlin 1996), p. 105–122.Google Scholar
Dungen, P. van den, The Hidden History of a Peace “classic”, Emeric Crucé's Le nouveau Cynée (London 1980).Google Scholar
Dungen, P. van den, “The Abbé de Saint-Pierre and the English ‘Irenists’ of the 18th Century (Penn, Bellers, and Bentham)” in International Journal on World Peace 17 (2000), p. 5–31.Google Scholar
Dunn, J., “Trust in the Politics of John Locke” in Rethinking Modern Political Theory, ed. by Dunn, J. (Cambridge 1985), p. 34–54.Google Scholar
Dunn, J., “Trust and Political Agency” in Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, ed. by Gambetta, D. (Oxford 1988), p. 73–93.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. S., Hugo Grotius. The Miracle of Holland. A Study of Political and Legal Thought (Chicago 1981).Google Scholar
Eisenkopf, P., Leibniz und die Einigung der Christenheit. Überlegungen zur Reunion der evangelischen und katholischen Kirche (Munich 1975).Google Scholar
Eliav-Feldon, M.Universal Peace for the Benefit of Trade: The Vision of Éméric Crucé” in Religion, Ideology and Nationalism in Europe and America; Essays presented in Honor of Yehoshua Arieli (Jerusalem 1986), p. 29–44.Google Scholar
Eliav-Feldon, M., “Grand Designs. The Peace Plans of the Late Renaissance” in Vivarium XXVII (1989), p. 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, J. H., “Foreign Policy and Domestic Crisis: Spain 1598–1659” in Krieg und Politik 1618–1648, ed. by Repgen, K. (Munich 1988), p. 185–202.Google Scholar
Elvert, J. and Nielsen-Sikora, J. (eds.), Leitbild Europa? Europabilder und ihre Wirkungen in der Neuzeit (Stuttgart 2009).Google Scholar
Engel, J., “Von der spätmittelalterlichen respubica chrisitiana zum Mächte-Europa der Neuzeit” in Die Entstehung des neuzeitlichen Europa. Handbuch der europäischen Geschichtevol. 3, ed. by Engel, J. (Stuttgart 1971), p. 1–384.Google Scholar
Espenhorst, M., “The Peace of Prague – A Failed Settlement?” in The Ashgate Research Companion to the Thirty Years War, ed. by Asbach, O. and Schröder, P. (Farnham 2014), p. 285–295.Google Scholar
Externbrink, S., “Kardinal Richelieu – ein Schüler Machiavellis?” in Der Machtstaat. Niccolò Machiavelli als Theoretiker der Macht im Spiegel der Zeit, ed. by Reinhardt, V., Saracino, S. and Voigt, R. (Baden-Baden 2015), p. 137–153.Google Scholar
Fenske, H., “Gleichgewicht, Balance” in Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland vol. 2, ed. by Brunner, O., Cronze, W. and Koselleck, R. (Stuttgart 1975), p. 959–996.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G., “Machiavelli als Schriftsteller” in Werke vol. XI, ed. by Fichte, I. H. (Berlin 1971), p. 401–453.Google Scholar
Fichtner, P. S., Terror and Toleration. The Habsburg Empire Confronts Islam, 1526–1850 (London 2008).Google Scholar
Fikentscher, W., De fide et perfidia. Der Treuegedanke in den “Staatsparallelen” des Hugo Grotius aus heutiger Sicht (Munich 1979).Google Scholar
Fink, G.-L., “La prise de Strasbourg et son écho dans les lettres Allemandes (1681–1684)” in Pouvoir, ville et société en Europe (1650–1750) (Paris 1983), p. 131–144.Google Scholar
Foisneau, L., “Security as a Norm in Hobbes's Theory of War: A Critique of Schmitt's Interpretation of Hobbes's Approach to International Relations” in War, the State and International Law in Seventeenth Century Europe, ed. by Asbach, O. and Schröder, P. (Farnham 2010), p. 163–180.Google Scholar
Folkes, H. G., “L'Abbé de Saint-Pierre assista-t-il au congres d'Utrecht?” in Revue d'Histoire Littèraire de la France 66 (1966), p. 483–487.Google Scholar
Forstmann, W., (ed.), Der Fall der Reichsstadt Straßburg und seine Folgen - Zur Stellung des 30. September 1681 in der Geschichte (Bad Neustadt a.d. Saale 1981).Google Scholar
Fuchs, B., “Faithless Empires: Pirates, Renegadoes, and the English Nation” in English Literary History 67 (2000), p. 45–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, R.-P., Ein “Medium zum Frieden”. Die Normaljahrsregel und die Beendigung des Dreißigjährigen Krieges (Munich 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuda, A., Sovereignty and the Sword Harrington, Hobbes, and Mixed Government in the English Civil Wars (Oxford 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagliardo, J. G., Reich and Nation. The Holy Roman Empire as Idea and Reality, 1765–1806 (London 1980).Google Scholar
Galli, C., “Alberico Gentili e Thomas Hobbes. Crisi dell'umanesimo e piena modernità” in Filosofia Politica XXI (2007), p. 213–227.Google Scholar
Gángó, G., “Information and Propaganda in Print: Leibniz's Eastern Europe” in European Review 23 (2015), p. 332–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrisson, J., L’Édit de Nantes et sa révocation. Histoire d'une intolérance (Paris 1985).Google Scholar
Gauthier, D., The Logic of Leviathan: The Moral and Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes (Oxford 1969).Google Scholar
Gelderblom, O., Cities of Commerce. The Institutional Foundations of International Trade in the Low Countries, 1250–1650 (Princeton 2013).Google Scholar
Gelderen, M. van, The Political Thought of the Dutch Revolt 1555–1590 (Cambridge 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelderen, M. van, “Universal Monarchy, the Rights of War and Peace and the Balance of Power: Europe's Quest for Civil Order” in Reflections on Europe: Defining a Political Order in Time and Space, ed. by Persson, H.-Å. and Stråth, B. (Brussels 2007), p. 49–71.Google Scholar
Gellinek, C., “Staat und Völkerrecht bei Hugo Grotius”in Staat bei Hugo Grotius, ed. by Konegen, N. and Nitschke, P. (Baden-Baden 2005), p. 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerard, J. W., The Peace of Utrecht. A Historical Review of the Great Treaty of 1713–14, and of the Principal Events of the War of the Spanish Succession (New York, London 1885).Google Scholar
Gilbert, F., Machiavelli and Giucciardini Politics and History in Sixteenth-Century Florence (Princeton 1965).Google Scholar
Gil Pujol, X., “The Good Law of a Vassal: Fidelity, Obedience and Obligation in Habsburg Spain” in Revista Internacional de los Estudios Vascos 5 (2009), p. 83–106.Google Scholar
Goldenbaum, U., “It's Love! Leibniz's Foundation of Natural Law as the Outcome of His Struggle with Hobbes’ and Spinoza's Naturalism” in The Philosophy of the Young Leibniz. Studia Leibnitiana Sonderheft (Stuttgart 2009), p. 189–201.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, M. M., Private Vices, Public Benefits. Bernard Mandeville's Social and Political Thought (Cambridge 1985).Google Scholar
Gollwitzer, H., Europabild und Europagedanke: Beiträge zur deutschen Geistesgeschichte des 18. und 19. Jahrhunderts (Munich 1951).Google Scholar
Gould, J. D., “The Trade Crisis of the Early 1620's and English Economic Thought” in The Journal of Economic History 15 (1955), p. 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goyard-Fabre, S., “Pufendorf, adversaire de Hobbes” in Hobbes Studies 2 (1989), p. 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greif, A., “Reputation and Coalitions in Medieval Trade: Evidence on the Maghribi Traders” in The Journal of Economic History 49 (1989), p. 857–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruner, W. D. (ed.), Deutschland und das Europäische Gleichgewicht seit dem 18. Jahrhundert (Hamburg 1989).Google Scholar
Grunert, F., “Zur aufgeklärten Kritik am theokratischen Absolutismus. Der Streit zwischen Hector Gottfried Masius und Christian Thomasius über Ursprung und Begründung der summa potestas” in Christian Thomasius (1655–1728). Neue Forschungen im Kontext der Frühaufklärung, ed. by Vollhardt, F. (Tübingen 1997), p. 51–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grunert, F., Normbegründung und politische Legitimität. Zur Rechts- und Staatsphilosophie der deutschen Frühaufklärung (Tübingen 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grunert, F., “The Reception of Hugo Grotius's De jure belli ac pacis in the Early German Enlightenment” in Early Modern Natural Law Theories: Contexts and Strategies in the Early Enlightenment, ed. by Hochstrasser, T. and Schröder, P. (Dordrecht 2001), p. 89–105.Google Scholar
Guinnane, T. W., “Trust: A Concept too Many” in Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte/Economic History Yearbook (Berlin 2005), p. 77–92.Google Scholar
Gunn, J. A. W., Politics and the Public Interest in the Seventeenth Century (London 1969).Google Scholar
Haakonssen, K., “Hugo Grotius and the History of Political Thought” in Political Theory 13 (1985), p. 239–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haakonssen, K., Natural Law and Moral Philosophy: From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment (Cambridge 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggenmacher, P., “Grotius and Gentili: A Reassessment of Thomas E. Holland's Inaugural Lecture” in Hugo Grotius and International Relations, ed. by Bull, H., Kingsbury, B. and Roberts, A. (Oxford 1990), p. 133–176.Google Scholar
Hammerstein, N., Jus und Historie. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des historischen Denkens an deutschen Universitäten im späten 17. und frühen 18. Jahrhundert (Göttingen 1972).Google Scholar
Hammerstein, N., “Leibniz und das Heilige Römische Reich deutscher Nation” in Nassauische Annalen 85 (1974), p. 87–102.Google Scholar
Harris, J. G., “‘The Canker of England's Commonwealth’: Gerard de Malynes and the Origins of Economic Pathology” in Textual Practice 13 (1999), p. 311–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, A. V., Rêveurs de Paix? Friedenspläne bei Crucé, Richelieu und Sully (Hamburg 1995).Google Scholar
Hartmann, M., “On the Concept of Basic Trust” in Behemoth. A Journal on Civilisation 8 (2015), p. 5–23.Google Scholar
Hartung, G., “Von Grotius zu Pufendorf. Die Herkunft des säkularisierten Strafrechts aus dem Kriegsrecht der Frühen Neuzeit” in Samuel Pufendorf und die europäische Frühaufklärung, ed. by Palladini, F. and Hartung, G. (Berlin 1996), p. 123–136.Google Scholar
Harvey, M., “Grotius and Hobbes” in British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (2006), p. 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslam, J., No Virtue like Necessity. Realist Theory in International Relations since Machiavelli (New Haven, London 2002).Google Scholar
Haude, S., “The Experience of War” in The Ashgate Research Companion to the Thirty Years War, ed. by Asbach, O. and Schröder, P. (Farnham 2014), p. 257–268.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A., “Dr. Bernard Mandeville (1670–1733)” in The Trend of Economic Thinking. Essays on Political Economists and Economic History, ed. by Hayek, F. A. (Indianapolis 1991), p. 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfferich, T. (ed.), The Thirty Years War. A Documentary History (Indianapolis 2009).Google Scholar
Heller, M. A., “The Use and Abuse of Hobbes: The State of Nature in International Relations” in Polity 13 (1980), p. 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinze, R., “Fides” in Vom Geist des Römertums, ed. by Heinze, R. (Darmstadt 1960), p. 59–81.Google Scholar
Herder, J. G., “Auch eine Philosophie der Geschichte zur Bildung der Menschheit” in Werke vol. I, ed. by Pross, W. (Munich 1984), p. 589–686.Google Scholar
Hinrichs, C., “Der Große Kurfürst 1620–1688” in Preussen als historisches Problem, ed. by Hinrichs, C. (Berlin 1964), p. 227–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinsley, F. H., Power and the Pursuit of Peace. Theory and Practice in the History of Relations between States (Cambridge 1963).Google Scholar
Hintze, H., Staatseinheit und Föderalismus im alten Frankreich und in der Revolution (Frankfurt am Main 1989).Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O., The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph (Princeton 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochstrasser, T., Natural Law Theories in the Early Enlightenment (Cambridge 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, K., “Hobbes and the Foole” in Political Theory 25 (1997), p. 620–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, K., “Hobbes on the Natural Condition of Mankind” in The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes's Leviathan, ed. by Springborg, P. (Cambridge 2007), p. 109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, K., “Gentili, Thucydides, and the justification of pre-emption” in Alberico Gentili. La salvaguardia dei beni culturali nel diretto internazionale (Milan 2008), p. 113–128.Google Scholar
Höffe, O., “Kant als Theoretiker der internationalen Rechtsgemeinschaft” in Recht, Staat und Völkerrecht bei Immanuel Kant, ed. by Hüning, D. and Tuschling, B. (Berlin 1998), p. 233–246.Google Scholar
Holland, B., “Pufendorf's Theory of Facultative Sovereignty: On the Configuration of the Soul of the State” in History of Political Thought 33 (2012), p. 427–454.Google Scholar
Hölscher, K., Die öffentliche Meinung über den Fall der Reichsstadt Straßburg während der Jahre 1681–1684 (Munich 1896).Google Scholar
Holsti, K. J., Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order 1648–1989 (Cambridge 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hont, I., “Free Trade and the Economic Limits to National Politics: Neo-Machiavellian Political Economy Reconsidered” in The Economic Limits to Politics, ed. by Dunn, J. (Cambridge 1990), p. 41–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hont, I., Jealousy of Trade. International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective (Harvard 2005).Google Scholar
Höpfl, H., Jesuit Political Thought The Society of Jesus and the State, c. 1540–1630 (Cambridge 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoppit, J., “Attitudes to Credit in Britain, 1680–1790” in The Historical Journal 33 (1990), p. 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hüning, D., Freiheit und Herrschaft in der Rechtslehre des Thomas Hobbes (Berlin 1998).Google Scholar
Hüning, D., “Von der Tugend der Gerechtigkeit zum Begriff der Rechtsordnung: Zur rechtsphilosophischen Bedeutung des suum cuique tribuere bei Hobbes und Kant” in Recht, Staat und Völkerrecht bei Immanuel Kant, ed. by Hüning, D. and Tuschling, B. (Berlin 1998), p. 53–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hüning, D., “‘Inter arma silent leges’. Naturrecht, Staat und Völkerrecht bei Thomas Hobbes” in Der Leviathan, ed. by Voigt, R. (Baden-Baden 1999), p. 129–163.Google Scholar
Hüning, D., “Naturzustand, natürliche Strafgewalt und Staat bei John Locke” in Souveränitätskonzeptionen. Beiträge zur Analyse politischer Ordnungsvorstellungen im 17. bis zum 20. Jahrhundert, ed. by Peters, M. and Schröder, P. (Berlin 2000), p. 85–108.Google Scholar
Hüning, D., “Nonne puniendi potestas reipublicae propria est – Die naturrechtliche Begründung der Strafgewalt bei Hugo Grotius” in Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik/Annual Review of Law and Ethics 8 (2001), p. 93–124.Google Scholar
Hüning, D., “Is not the Power to Punish Essentially a Power that Pertains to the State? The Different Foundations of the Right to Punish in Early Modern Natural Law Doctrines” in Politisches Denken. Jahrbuch 2004, ed. by Gerhardt, V., Ottmann, H. and Thompson, M. P. (Berlin 2004), p. 43–60.Google Scholar
Hüning, D., “Die Begründung des Strafrechts in Hobbes' Leviathan” in Der lange Schatten des Leviathan, ed. by Hüning, D. (Berlin 2005), p. 235–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hüning, D., “Die Begründung des ius puniendi in der Naturrechtslehre des 17. Jahrhunderts” in Kriminalität in Mittelalter und Früher Neuzeit, ed. by Kesper-Biermann, S. and Klippel, D. (Wiesbaden 2007), p. 77–114.Google Scholar
Hüning, D., “Hobbes on the Right to Punish” in The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes's Leviathan, ed. by Springborg, P. (Cambridge 2007), p. 217–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hüning, D., “Souveränität und Strafgewalt. Die Begründung des jus puniendi bei Samuel Pufendorf” in Naturrecht und Staatstheorie bei Samuel Pufendorf, ed. by Hüning, D. (Baden-Baden 2009), p. 71–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hüning, D. (ed.), Naturrecht und Staatstheorie bei Samuel Pufendorf (Baden-Baden 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutton, J., “Erasmus and France: The Propaganda for Peace” in Studies in the Renaissance 8 (1961), p. 103–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hundert, E. J., The Enlightenment Fable. Bernard Mandeville and the Discovery of Society (Cambridge 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, I., Rival Enlightenments. Civil and Metaphysical Philosophy in Early Modern Germany (Cambridge 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, I., “The Love of a Sage or the Command of a Superior: The Natural Law Doctrines of Leibniz and Pufendorf” in Early Modern Natural Law Theories: Contexts and Strategies in the Early Enlightenment, ed. by Hochstrasser, T. and Schröder, P. (Dordrecht 2003), p. 169–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, I., The Secularisation of the Confessional State The Political Thought of Christian Thomasius (Cambridge 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Immich, M., Geschichte des Europäischen Staatensystems 1660–1789 (Munich, Berlin 1905).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israel, J. I., The Dutch Republic. Its Rise, Greatness, and Fall 1477–1806 (Oxford 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israel, J. I., Enlightenment Contested Philosophy, Modernity, and the Emancipation of Many 1670–1752 (Oxford 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ittersum, M. J. van, Profit and Principle: Hugo Grotius, Natural Rights Theories and the Rise of Dutch Power in the East Indies, 1595–1615 (Leiden 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ittersum, M. J. van, “The Long Goodbye: Hugo Grotius’ Justification of Dutch Expansion Overseas, 1615–1645” in History of European Ideas 36 (2010), p. 386–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansky, H., “Osmanenherrschaft in Südosteuropa von 1648–1789” in Handbuch der Europäischen Geschichte vol. 4, ed. by Schieder, T. (Stuttgart 1968), p. 753–776.Google Scholar
Janssen, W., “Krieg” in Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland vol. 3, ed. by Brunner, O., Conze, W. and Koselleck, R. (Stuttgart 1982), p. 567–615.Google Scholar
Johnson, E. A. J., “Gerard de Malynes and the Theory of the Foreign Exchanges” in The American Economic Review 23 (1933), p. 441–455.Google Scholar
Johnson, P., Frames of Deceit. A Study of the Loss and Recovery of Public and Private Trust (Cambridge 1993).Google Scholar
Justenhoven, H.-G., Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit. Ethische Norm und Rechtswirklichkeit (Stuttgart 2006).Google Scholar
Kaeber, E., Die Idee des europäischen Gleichgewichts in der publizistischen Literatur vom 16. bis zur Mitte des 18. Jahrhunderts (Berlin 1907).Google Scholar
Kaiser, T. E., “The Abbé de Saint-Pierre, Public Opinion, and the Reconstitution of the French Monarchy” in Journal of Modern History 55 (1983), p. 618–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamen, H., Spain's Road to Empire. The Making of a World Power 1492–1763 (London 2002).Google Scholar
Kampmann, C., “Peace Impossible?: The Holy Roman Empire and the European State System in the Seventeenth Century” in War, the State and International Law in Seventeenth Century Europe, ed. by Asbach, O. and Schröder, P. (Farnham 2010), p. 197–210.Google Scholar
Kappen, O. M. van and Wyduckel, D. (eds.), Der Westfälische Frieden in rechts- und staatstheoretischer Perspektive (Berlin 1999).Google Scholar
Kelsen, H., Das Problem der Souveränität und die Theorie des Völkerrechts. Beitrag zu einer reinen Rechtslehre [1928](Stuttgart 1960).Google Scholar
Kimminich, O., “Die Entstehung des neuzeitlichen Völkerrechts” in Pipers Handbuch der politischen Ideen, Bd. 3: Neuzeit: Von den Konfessionskriegen bis zur Aufklärung, ed. by Fetscher, I. and Münkler, H. (Munich 1985), p. 73–100.Google Scholar
Kingdon, R. M., Myths about the St Bartholomew's Day Massacres 1572–1576 (Cambridge, Mass. 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsbury, B., “Confronting Difference: The Puzzling Durability of Gentili's Combination of Pragmatic Pluralism and Normative Judgement” in The American Journal of International Law 92 (1998), p. 713–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsbury, B. and Straumann, B., “State of Nature versus Commercial Society as the Basis of International Law: Reflections on the Roman Foundations and Current Interpretation of the International Political and Legal Thought of Grotius, Hobbes and Pufendorf” in The Philosophy of International Law, ed. by Besson, S. and Tasioulas, J. (Oxford 2010), p. 33–51.Google Scholar
Klaits, J., Printed Propaganda Under Louis XIV: Absolute Monarchy and Public Opinion (Princeton 1976).Google Scholar
Kleemeier, U., “Krieg und Militär in Hobbes' Leviathan” in Grundfragen einer philosophischen Theorie des Krieges, ed. by Kleemeier, U. (Berlin 2002), p. 125–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleemeier, U., Grundfragen einer philosophischen Theorie des Krieges (Berlin 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klenner, H., “Bileams Pferd auf die Kanzeln! Zur Natur- und Völkerrechtslehre des Samuel Pufendorf” in Samuel Pufendorf und seine Wirkungen bis auf die heutige Zeit, ed. by Geyer, B. and Goerlich, H. (Baden-Baden 1996), p. 195–208.Google Scholar
Klesmann, B., Bellum Solemne. Formen und Funktionen europäischer Kriegserklärungen des 17. Jahrhunderts (Mainz 2007).Google Scholar
Kobusch, T., “Pufendorfs Lehre vom moralischen Sein” in Samuel von Pufendorf und die europäische Frühaufklärung, ed. by Palladini, F. and Hartung, G. (Berlin 1996), p. 63–73.Google Scholar
Konegen, N. and Nitschke, P. (eds.), Staat bei Hugo Grotius (Baden-Baden 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koselleck, R., “Patriotismus. Gründe und Grenzen eines neuzeitlichen Begriffs” in ‘Patria’ und ‘Patrioten’ vor dem Patriotismus Pflichten, Rechte, Glauben und die Rekonfigurierung europäischer Gemeinwesen im 17. Jahrhundert, ed. by Friedeburg, R. v. (Wiesbaden 2005), p. 535–552.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M., The Gentle Civilizer of Nations. The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960 (Cambridge 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, M., “International Law and raison d'état: Rethinking the Prehistory of International Law” in The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire, ed. by Kingsbury, B. and Straumann, B. (Oxford 2010), p. 297–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, M., “International Law and the Emergence of Mercantile Capitalism” in The Roots of International Law, ed. by Dupuy, P.-M. and Chetail, V. (Leiden 2014), p. 3–37.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M., “Transformations of Natural Law. Germany 1648-1815” in The Oxford Handbook of International Law, ed. by Orford, A. and Hoffmann, F. (Oxford 2016), p. 59–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretschmayr, H., Die Türken vor Wien, Stimmen und Berichte aus dem Jahre 1683 (Munich 1938).Google Scholar
Krieger, L., The Politics of Discretion Pufendorf and the Acceptance of Natural Law (Chicago 1965).Google Scholar
Krippendorff, E., Staat und Krieg. Die historische Logik politischer Unvernunft (Frankfurt am Main 1985).Google Scholar
Kükelhaus, T., Der Ursprung des Planes vom ewigen Frieden in den Memoiren des Herzogs von Sully (Berlin 1893).Google Scholar
Kunisch, J., Staatsverfassung und Mächtepolitik. Zur Genese von Staatenkonflikten im Zeitalter des Absolutismus (Berlin 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunisch, J., Fürst – Gesellschaft – Krieg. Studien zur bellizistischen Disposition des absoluten Fürstenstaates (Köln 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunisch, J. and Neuhaus, H. (eds.), Der dynastische Fürstenstaat. Zur Bedeutung der Sukzessionsordnungen für die Entstehung des frühmodernen Staates (Berlin 1982).Google Scholar
Labrousse, E., Pierre Bayle: Du pays de Foix a la cité d'Erasme vol. I (The Hague 1963).Google Scholar
Labrousse, E., ‘Une foi, une loi, un roi?’ La Révocation de l'édit de Nantes (Geneva 1985).Google Scholar
Larrère, C., L'Invention de l’économie au XVIIIe siècle. Du droit naturel à la physiocratie (Paris 1992).Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H., “The Grotian Tradition in International Law” in British Year Book of International Law 23 (1946), p. 1–53.Google Scholar
Lavenia, V., “Alberico Gentili: I Processi, le Fedi, la Guerra” in Ius gentium, Ius communicationis, Ius belli. Alberico Gentili e gli orizzonti della modernità, Atti del Convegno di Macerata in occasione del Quarto Centenario della morte di Alberico Gentili (Milan 2009), p. 165–196.Google Scholar
Leclercle, J. L., “L'Abbé de Saint-Pierre, Rousseau et l'Europe” in Dix-Huitième Siécle 25 (1993), p. 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levack, B. P., The Civil Lawyers in England 1603–1641: A Political Study (Oxford 1973).Google Scholar
Luard, E., The Balance of Power. The System of International Relations 1648–1815 (London 1992).Google Scholar
Lübbe, H., Säkularisierung. Geschichte eines ideenpolitischen Begriffs (Freiburg 1965).Google Scholar
Louis-Luca, P., Un plan de paix générale et de liberté du commerce au XVIIe siècle. Le Nouveau Cynée d'Émeric Crucé (Paris 1919).Google Scholar
Luh, J., Unheiliges Römisches Reich. Der konfessionelle Gegensatz 1648 bis 1806 (Potsdam 1995).Google Scholar
Luhmann, N., Vertrauen. Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexität (Stuttgart 1973).Google Scholar
Luhmann, N., Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie (Frankfurt am Main 1987).Google Scholar
Lupher, D., Romans in a New World. Classical Models in Sixteenth-Century Spanish America (Ann Arbor 2003).Google Scholar
Lupher, D., “The De armis Romanis and the Exemplum of Roman Imperialism” in The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire, ed. by Kingsbury, B. and Straumann, B. (Oxford 2010), p. 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutterbeck, K. G., “Pufendorfs Unterscheidung von physischem und moralischem Sein und seine politische Theorie” in Naturrecht und Staatstheorie bei Samuel Pufendorf, ed. by Hüning, D. (Baden-Baden 2009), p. 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, M. G. and Mastandundo, M. (eds.), Beyond Westphalia? National Sovereignty and International Intervention (Baltimore, London 1995).Google Scholar
Mahlberg, G. and Wiemann, D. (eds.), European Contexts for English Republicanism (Farnham 2013).Google Scholar
Maihofer, W., “Schlußwort: Was uns Pufendorf noch Heute zu sagen hat” in Samuel Pufendorf und seine Wirkungen bis auf die heutige Zeit, ed. by Geyer, B. and Goerlich, H. (Baden-Baden 1996), p. 223–282.Google Scholar
Maissen, T., Die Geburt der Republic. Staatsverständnis und Repräsentation in der frühneuzeitlichen Eidgenossenschaft (Göttingen 2006).Google Scholar
Malcolm, N., “Hobbes's Theory of International Relations” in Aspects of Hobbes, ed. by Malcolm, N. (Oxford 2002), p. 432–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malettke, K.Richelieus Außenpolitik und sein Projekt kollektiver Sicherheit” in Kontinuität und Wandel in der Staatenordnung der Neuzeit. Beiträge zur Geschichte des internationalen Systems, ed. by Krüger, P. (Marburg 1991), p. 47–68.Google Scholar
Malettke, K., Frankreich, Deutschland und Europa im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert. Beiträge zum Einfluß französischer politischer Theorie, Verfassung und Außenpolitik in der Frühen Neuzeit (Marburg 1994).Google Scholar
Malettke, K., “Europabewußtsein und Europäische Friedenspläne im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert” in Francia 21 (1994), p. 63–92.Google Scholar
Mallett, M. E., “The Theory and Practice of Warfare in Machiavelli's Republic” in Machiavelli and Republicanism, ed. by Bock, G. and Skinner, Q. (Cambridge 1990).Google Scholar
Martin, M. M., “Sully, Henri IV et l'organisation de l'Europe” in Revue des Deux Monde 20 (1958), p. 677–689.Google Scholar
Medick, H., Naturzustand und Naturgeschichte der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Die Ursprünge der bürgerlichen Sozialtheorie bei Samuel Pufendorf, John Locke und Adam Smith (Göttingen 1981).Google Scholar
Meinberg, H., Das Gleichgewichtssystem Wilhelms III. und die Englische Handels-politik (Berlin 1869).Google Scholar
Mendus, S. and Horton, J., “Locke and Toleration” in John Locke A Letter Concerning Toleration, ed. by Horton, J. and Mendus, S. (London, New York 1991), p. 1–11.Google Scholar
Merkel, R., “‘Lauter leidige Tröster’? Kants Friedensschrift und die Idee eines Völkerstrafgerichtshofs” in ‘Zum ewigen Frieden’. Grundlagen, Aktualität und Aussichten einer Idee von Immanuel Kant, ed. by Merkel, R. and Wittmann, R. (Frankfurt am Main 1996), p. 309–350.Google Scholar
Merle, A., “Un aspect de l'antimachiavélisme des Jésuites: Le Prince Chrétien de Pedro de Ribadeneyra entre simulation et dissimulation” in Les Jésuites en Espagne et en Amérique, ed. by Molinié, A., Merle, A. andGuillaume-Alonso, A. (Paris 2007), p. 111–140.Google Scholar
Meumann, M. and Niefanger, D. (eds.), Ein Schauplatz herber Angst. Wahrnehmung und Darstellung von Gewalt im 17. Jahrhundert (Göttingen 1997).Google Scholar
Molen, G. van der, Alberico Gentili and the Development of International Law (Leiden 1968).Google Scholar
Molinari, G. de, L'abbé de Saint-Pierre. Membre exclu de l'Académie française. Sa vie et ses œuvres (Paris 1857).Google Scholar
Mollat, M. (ed.), Sociétés et compagnies de commerce en Orient et dans l'Océan Indien (Paris 1970).Google Scholar
Moore, J. and Silverthorne, M., “Protestant Theologies, Limited Sovereignties: Natural Law and Conditions of Union in the German Empire, the Netherlands and Great Britain” in A Union for Empire. Political Thought and the British Union of 1707, ed. by Robertson, J. (Cambridge 1995), p. 171–197.Google Scholar
Motley, J. L., The Life and Death of John of Barneveld, Advocate of Holland: with a View of the primary Causes and Movements of the Thirty Years' War (London 1874).Google Scholar
Mousnier, R., “Les crises intérieures françaises de 1610 à 1659 et leur influence sur la politique extérieure française, surtout de 1618 à 1648” in Krieg und Politik 1618–1648, ed. by Repgen, K. (Munich 1988), p. 169–183.Google Scholar
Moyn, S., “On the Nonglobalization of Ideas” in Global Intellectual History, ed. by Moyn, S. and Sartori, A. (New York 2013), p. 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muchmore, L., “Gerard de Malynes and Mercantile Economics” in History of Political Economy 1 (1969), p. 336–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muldrew, C., “Interpreting the Market: The Ethics of Credit and Community Relations in Early Modern England” in Social History 18 (1993), p. 163–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muldrew, C., The Economy of Obligation. The Culture of Credit and Social Relations in Early Modern England (Houndmills 1998).Google Scholar
Mulsow, M., “Gundling vs. Buddeus. Competing Models of the History of Philo-sophy” in History and the Disciplines. The Reclassification of Knowledge in Early Modern Europe, ed. by Kelley, D. R. (Rochester, New York 1997), p. 103–125.Google Scholar
Mulvaney, R. J., “The Early Development of Leibniz's Concept of Justice” in Journal of the History of Ideas 29 (1968), p. 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Münkler, H., Machiavelli. Die Begründung des politischen Denkens aus der Krise der Republik Florenz (Frankfurt am Main 1982).Google Scholar
Nedermann, C. J. and Laursen, C. (eds.), Difference and Dissent: Theories of Toleration in Medieval and Early Modern Europe (Lanham 1996).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F., On the Genealogy of Morality, ed. by Ansell-Pearson, K. (Cambridge 2003).Google Scholar
Nys, E., “Histoire du droit international. A propos de la paix perpétuelle de l'abbé de Saint-Pierre, Éméric Crucé et Ernest Landgrave de Hesse-Rheinfels” in Revue de droit internationale et de législation comparée XXII (1890), p. 371–384.Google Scholar
Nys, E., Les Théories Politiques et le Droit International en France jusqu'au XVIIIe Siècle (Paris 1899).Google Scholar
Nys, E., “Introduction” in Gentili, A., De Legationibus Libri Tres, ed. by Scott, J. B. (New York 1924), p. 11a–38a.Google Scholar
O'Connor, J. T., “Politique et Utopie au début du XVIIe siècle: Le Grand Dessein de Henri IV et Sully” in XVIIe siècle. Revue publiée par la Société d'Étude de XVIIe siècle 174 (1992), p. 33–42.Google Scholar
Orth, E. W., “Interesse” in Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland vol. 3, ed. by Brunner, O., Conze, W. and Koselleck, R. (Stuttgart 1975), p. 305–365.Google Scholar
Ottow, R., Markt – Republik – Tugend. Probleme gesellschaftlicher Modernisierung im britischen politischen Denken 1670–1790 (Berlin 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oschmann, A., “Der metus justus in der deutschen Kriegsrechtslehre des 17. Jahrhunderts” in Angst und Politik in der europäischen Geschichte, ed. by Bosbach, F. (Dettelbach 2000), p. 101–131.Google Scholar
Osiander, A., “Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth” in International Organization 55 (2001), p. 251–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Othmer, S., Berlin und die Verbreitung des Naturrechts in Europa. Kultur- und sozialgeschichtliche Studien zu Jean Barbeyracs Pufendorf-Übersetzungen und eine Analyse seiner Leserschaft (Berlin 1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagden, A., The Fall of Natural Man. The American Indian and the Origins of Comparative Ethnology (Cambridge 1982).Google Scholar
Pagden, A., “Gentili, Vitoria, and the Fabrication of a ‘Natural Law of Nations’” in The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire, ed. by Kingsbury, B. and Straumann, B. (Oxford 2010), p. 340–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palladini, F., Discussioni seicentesche su Samuel Pufendorf. Scritti latini: 1663–1700 (Bologna 1978).Google Scholar
Palladini, F., “Di una critica di Leibniz à Pufendorf” in Percorsi della Ricerca filosofica. Filosofie tra storia linguaggio e politica (Rome 1990), p. 19–27.Google Scholar
Palladini, F., Samuel Pufendorf Discepolo di Hobbes. Per una reinterpretazione del Giusnaturalismo moderno (Bologna 1990).Google Scholar
Palladini, F., “Appetitus Societatis in Grozio e Socialitas in Pufendorf” in Filosofia Politica X (1996), p. 61–70.Google Scholar
Palladini, F., “Pufendorf Disciple of Hobbes: The Nature of Man and the State of Nature: The Doctrine of Socialitas” in History of European Ideas 34 (2008), p. 26–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palladini, F., Die Berliner Hugenotten und der Fall Barbeyrac Orthodoxe und ‘Sozinianer’ im Refuge (1685–1720) (Leiden 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panizza, D., Alberico Gentili giurista ideologo nell'Inghilterra elisabettiana (Padua 1981).Google Scholar
Panizza, D., “Il pensiero politico di Alberico Gentili. Religione, virtù e ragion di stato” in Alberico Gentili Politica e religione nell'Età delle Guerre die Religione, ed. by Panizza, D. (Milan 2002), p. 57–213.Google Scholar
Panizza, D. (ed.), Alberico Gentili Politca e religione nell'età delle guerre di religione (Milan 2002).Google Scholar
Panizza, D., “Alberico Gentili's De armis Romanis: The Roman Model of Just Empire” in The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire, ed. by Kingsbury, B. and Straumann, B. (Oxford 2010), p. 53–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panizza, D., “Political Theory and Jurisprudence in Gentili's De Iure Belli. The great Debate between ‘theological’ and ‘humanist’ Perspectives from Vitoria to Grotius” in The Roots of International Law, ed. by Dupuy, P.-M. and Chetail, V. (Leiden 2014), p. 211–247.Google Scholar
Parrott, D., Richelieu's Army. War, Government and Society in France, 1624–1642 (Cambridge 2001).Google Scholar
Pastor, L., Geschichte der Päpste seit dem Ausgang des Mittelalters, vol. XIII.1.: Gregor XV. (1621–1623); Urban VIII. (1623–1644) (Freiburg 1939).Google Scholar
Patel, K. K., “William Penn und sein Essay ‘Towards the Present and Future Peace of Europe’ (1693). Friedensfürst, Vordenker europäischer Einigung oder Machtpolitiker?” in Historische Zeitschrift 295 (2012), p. 330–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, M. L., The Moral and Political Philosophy of the Abbé de Saint-Pierre (Geneva, Paris 1959).Google Scholar
Pfaehler, D., “Die Kapitulation der Reichsstadt Straßburg am 30. September 1681, ihre Vorgeschichte und ihre Folgen” in Der Fall der Reichsstadt Straßburg und seine Folgen – Zur Stellung des 30. September 1681 in der Geschichte, ed. by Forstmann, W. (Bad Neustadt a.d. Saale 1981), p. 3–53.Google Scholar
Pfister, C., “Les ‘Economies Royales’ de Sully et le Grand Dessein de Henri IV” in Revue historique LIV (1894), p. 300–324.Google Scholar
Phillipson, N., “Politics, Politeness and the Anglicisation of Early Eighteenth-Century Scottish Culture” in Scotland and England, 1286–1815, ed. by Mason, R. A. (Edinburgh 1987), p. 226–246.Google Scholar
Piirimäe, P., “Just War in History and Practice: The Legitimation of Swedish Intervention in the Thirty Years War” in The Historical Journal 45 (2002), p. 499–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piirimäe, P., “Russia, the Turks and Europe: Legitimations of War and the Formation of European Identity in the Early Modern Period” in Journal of Early Modern History 11 (2007), p. 63–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piirimäe, P., “Alberico Gentili's Doctrine of Defensive War and its Impact on Seventeenth-Century Normative Views” in The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire, ed. by Kingsbury, B. and Straumann, B. (Oxford 2010), p. 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platania, M., “Montesquieu und der ‘doux commerce’: Wie Handel Gesellschaft und Politik verwandelt” in Der moderne Staat und ‘le doux commerce’. Politik, Ökonomie und internationale Beziehungen im politischen Denken der Aufklärung, ed. by Asbach, O. (Baden-Baden 2014), p. 69–90.Google Scholar
Platzhoff, W., Geschichte des Europäischen Staatensystems 1559–1660 (Munich, Berlin 1928).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A., “Machiavelli, Harrington and English Political Ideologies in the Eighteenth Century” in Politics, Language and Time. Essays on Political Thought, ed. by Pocock, J. G. A. (London 1972).Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A., The Machiavellian Moment. Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition (Princeton 1975).Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A., The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law. A Study of English Historical Thought in the Seventeenth Century (Cambridge 2004).Google Scholar
Pohling, M., “Konfessionelle Deutungsmuster internationaler Konflikte um 1600 – Kreuzzug, Antichrist, Tausendjähriges Reich” in Archiv für Reformationsgeschichte 93 (2002), p. 278–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Press, V., “Die kaiserliche Stellung im Reich zwischen 1648 und 1740 – Versuch einer Neubewertung” in Stände und Gesellschaft im Alten Reich, ed. by Schmidt, G. (Stuttgart 1989), p. 51–80.Google Scholar
Pribram, A. F., Franz Paul Freiherr von Lisola 1613–1674 und die Politik seiner Zeit (Leipzig 1894).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokhovnik, R. and Slomp, G. (eds.), International Political Theory after Hobbes: Analysis, Interpretation and Orientation (Houndmills 2011).Google Scholar
Quaritsch, H., “Bodins Souveränität und das Völkerrecht” in Archiv des Völkerrechts 17 (1977–1978), p. 257–273.Google Scholar
Quaritsch, H., Souveränität: Entstehung und Entwicklung des Begriffs in Frankreich und in Deutschland vom 13. Jahrhundert bis 1806 (Berlin 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randelzhofer, A., Die Pflichtenlehre bei Samuel von Pufendorf (Berlin, New York 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raumer, K. v., Ewiger Friede. Friedensrufe und Friedenspläne seit der Renaissance (Freiburg, Munich 1953).Google Scholar
Recknagel, D., Einheit des Denkens trotz konfessioneller Spaltung. Parallelen zwischen den Rechtslehren von Francisco Suárez und Hugo Grotius (Frankfurt am Main 2010).Google Scholar
Reibstein, E., “Pufendorfs Völkerrechtslehre” in Österreichische Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht 7 (1957), p. 43–72.Google Scholar
Repgen, K., “Der Westfälische Frieden und die Ursprünge des europäischen Gleichgewichts” in Jahres- und Tagungsbericht der Görres-Gesellschaft 1985, p. 50–66.Google Scholar
Repgen, K., “Kriegslegitimationen in Alteuropa Entwurf einer historischen Typologie” in Historische Zeitschrift 241 (1985), p. 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, P., “The Abbé de St. Pierre and Voltaire on Perpetual Peace in Europe” in World Affairs 137 (1974–1975), p. 186–194.Google Scholar
Riley, P., Leibniz' Universal Jurisprudence. Justice as the Charity of the Wise (Cambridge 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, P., “Introduction” in Bossuet, Politics drawn from Holy Scripture, ed. by Riley, P. (Cambridge 1999), p. XIII–XLIII.Google Scholar
Ringhofer, C., Die Flugschriften-Literatur zu Beginn des spanischen Erbfolgekriegs (Berlin 1881).Google Scholar
Ringier, J. E., Der Abbé de Saint-Pierre. Ein Nationalökonom des XVIII. Jahrhunderts (Karlsruhe 1905).Google Scholar
Ritter, M., “Die Memoiren Sullys und der grosse Plan Heinrichs IV” in Abhandlungen der Historischen Klasse der Königlichen Bayrischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 11 (1870), p. 1–53.Google Scholar
Robinet, A., G. W. Leibniz. Le meilleur des mondes par la balance de l'Europe (Paris 1994).Google Scholar
Roeck, B., Reichssystem und Reichsherkommen. Die Diskusssion über die Staatlichkeit des Reiches in der politischen Publizistik des 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts (Stuttgart 1984).Google Scholar
Roelofsen, C. G. and Somers, J. I., “‘Mare Librum’ and the Dutch East India Company: The Freedom of the Seas and Freedom of Trade as the Legal Bases of the Dutch Colonial State in the Indonesian Archipelago” in Grotiana 24/25 (2003–2004), p. 67–76.Google Scholar
Rohrschneider, M., Der gescheiterte Frieden von Münster. Spaniens Ringen mit Frankreich auf dem Westfälischen Friedenskongress 1643–1649 (Münster 2006).Google Scholar
Rohrschneider, M., “Reputation als Leitfaktor in den internationalen Beziehungen der Frühen Neuzeit” in Historische Zeitschrift 291 (2010), p. 331–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roosen, W. J., The Age of Louis XIV: The Rise of Modern Diplomacy (Cambridge, Mass. 1976).Google Scholar
Rosenberg, J., The Empire of Civil Society. A Critique of the Realist Theory of International Relations (London, New York 1994).Google Scholar
Rothkrug, L., Opposition to Louis XIV – The Political and Social Origins of the French Enlightenment (Princeton 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saastamoinen, K., The Morality of the Fallen Man Samuel Pufendorf on Natural Law (Helsinki 1995).Google Scholar
Sabbagh, D., “William Penn et l'abbé de Saint-Pierre: Le Chaînon manquant” in Revue de Synthèse 4 (1997), p. 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saint-René Taillandier, M. M. L., Le cœur du roi. Henri IV après la messe (Paris 1934).Google Scholar
Saitta, A., Dalla Res Publica Christiana agli Stati uniti di Europa. Sviluppo dell'idea pacifista in Francia nei Secoli XVII-XIX (Rome 1948).Google Scholar
Salmon, J. H. M., The French Religious Wars in English Political Thought (Oxford 1959).Google Scholar
Salmon, J. H. M., “Rohan and Interest of State” in Staatsräson. Studien zur Geschichte eines politischen Begriffs, ed. by Schnur, R. (Berlin 1975), p. 121–140.Google Scholar
Saunders, D., “Hegemon History: Pufendorf 's Shifting Perspectives on France and French Power” in War, the State and International Law in Seventeenth Century Europe, ed. by Asbach, O. and Schröder, P. (Farnham 2010), p. 211–230.Google Scholar
Sauter, J., Die philosophischen Grundlagen des Naturrechts Untersuchungen zur Rechts- und Staatslehre (Frankfurt am Main 1966).Google Scholar
Schilling, H., “Formung und Gestalt des internationalen Systems in der werdenden Neuzeit – Phasen und bewegende Kräfte” in Kontinuität und Wandel in der Staatenordnung der Neuzeit. Beiträge zur Geschichte des internationalen Systems, ed. by Krüger, P. (Marburg 1991), p. 19–46.Google Scholar
Schilling, H., “Konfessionalisierung und Formierung eines internationalen Systems während der Frühen Neuzeit” in Die Reformation in Deutschland und Europa: Interpretationen und Debatten, ed. by Guiggisberg, H. and Krodel, G.Heidelberg 1993), p. 591–613.Google Scholar
Schilling, H., “Der Westfälische Friede und das neuzeitliche Profil Europas” in Der Westfälische Friede. Diplomatie – politische Zäsur – kulturelles Umfeld – Rezeptionsgeschichte, ed. by Duchhardt, H. (Munich 1998), p. 3–32.Google Scholar
Schilling, H., “Johannes Althusius und die Konfessionalisierung der Außenpolitik – oder: Warum gibt es in der Politica keine Theorie der internationalen Beziehungen?” in Jurisprudenz, Politische Theorie und Politische Theologie, ed. by Carney, F. S., Schilling, H. and Wyduckel, D. (Berlin 2004), p. 47–69.Google Scholar
Schilling, H. (ed.), Konfessioneller Fundamentalismus. Religion als politischer Faktor im europäischen Mächtesystem um 1600 (Munich 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schindling, A., Die Anfänge des Immerwährenden Reichstags zu Regensburg. Ständevertretung und Staatskunst nach dem Westfälischen Frieden (Mainz 1991).Google Scholar
Schmidt, F.-S., Praktisches Naturrecht zwischen Thomasius und Wolff: Der Völkerrechtler Adam Friedrich Glafey (1692–1753) (Baden-Baden 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, H. D., “The Establishment of Europe as a Political Expression” in The Historical Journal IX (1966), p. 172–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, C., Political Theology. Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, translated by Schwab, G. (Chicago 1985).Google Scholar
Schmitt, C., The Nomos of the Earth in International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum, translated by Ulmen, G. L. (New York 2003).Google Scholar
Schmitt, C., Legality and Legitimacy, translated by Seitzer, J. (Durham, London 2004).Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B., “Barbeyrac and Leibniz on Pufendorf” in Samuel Pufendorf und die europäische Frühaufklärung, ed. by Palladini, F. and Hartung, G. (Berlin 1996), p. 181–189.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B., The Invention of Autonomy. A History of Modern Moral Philosophy (Cambridge 1998).Google Scholar
Schneider, H. P., “Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz” in Staatsdenker in der frühen Neuzeit, ed. by Stolleis, M. (Munich 1995), p. 197–226.Google Scholar
Schrecker, P., “Leibniz's Principles of International Justice” in Journal of the History of Ideas 7 (1946), p. 484–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, P. W., The Transformation of European Politics 1763–1848 (Oxford 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schröder, M. (ed.), 350 Jahre Westfälischer Friede. Verfassungsgeschichte, Staatskirchenrecht, Völkerrechtsgeschichte (Berlin 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schröder, P., “Thomas Hobbes, Christian Thomasius and the Seventeenth-Century Debate on the Church and State” in History of European Ideas 23 (1997), p. 59–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schröder, P., “The Constitution of the Holy Roman Empire after 1648: Samuel Pufendorf's Assessment in his Monzambano” in Historical Journal 42 (1999), p. 961–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schröder, P., “Völkerrecht und Souveränität bei Thomas Hobbes” in Souveränitätskonzeptionen. Beiträge zur Analyse politischer Ordnungsvorstellungen im 17. bis zum 20. Jahrhundert, ed. by Peters, M. and Schröder, P. (Berlin 2000), p. 41–57.Google Scholar
Schröder, P., Naturrecht und absolutistisches Staatsrecht. Eine vergleichende Studie zu Thomas Hobbes und Christian Thomasius (Berlin 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schröder, P., “Reich versus Territorien? Zum Problem der Souveränität im Heiligen Römischen Reich nach dem Westfälischen Frieden” in Altes Reich, Frankreich und Europa. Politische, philosophische und historische Aspekte des französischen Deutschlandbildes im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert, ed. by Asbach, O., Externbrink, S. and Malettke, K. (Berlin 2001), p. 123–143.Google Scholar
Schröder, P., “Natural Law, Sovereignty and International Law: A Comparative Perspective” in Natural Law and Civil Sovereignty, ed. by Hunter, I. and Saunders, D. (Houndmills 2002), p. 204–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schröder, P., “Freiheit und Herrschaft in den Rechtslehren von Grotius und Hobbes” in Staat bei Hugo Grotius, ed. by Konegen, N. and Nitschke, P. (Baden-Baden 2005), p. 107–123.Google Scholar
Schröder, P., “Taming the Fox and the Lion – Some Aspects of the Sixteenth Century's Debate on Inter-state Relations” in War, the State and International Law in Seventeenth Century Europe, ed. by Asbach, O. and Schröder, P. (Farnham 2010), p. 83–102.Google Scholar
Schröder, P., “Sine fide nulla pax – Überlegungen zu Vertrauen und Krieg in den politischen Theorien von Machiavelli, Gentili und Grotius” in War in Words Transformations of War from Antiquity to Clausewitz, ed. by Formisano, M. and Böhme, H. (Berlin 2010), p. 37–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schröder, P., “Vitoria, Gentili, Bodin: Sovereignty and the Law of Nations” in The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire, ed. by Kingsbury, B. and Straumann, B. (Oxford 2010), p. 163–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schröder, P., “‘Irgend ein Vertrauen … muss … übrig bleiben’ – The Idea of Trust in Kant's Moral and Political Philosophy” in Cultivating Personhood: Kant and Asian Philosophy, ed. by Palmquist, S. R. (Berlin 2010), p. 391–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schröder, P., “Der Feind hors la loi – Piraten, Partisanen und Terroristen” in Freund-Feind-Denken, ed. by Voigt, R. (Stuttgart 2011), p. 195–212.Google Scholar
Schröder, P., “Die Kunst der Staatserhaltung” in Machiavelli: Der Fürst, ed. by Höffe, O. (Berlin 2012), p. 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schröder, P., “‘Une distinction frivole’ – Enlightenment Discussions of Citizenship” in Athenian Legacies. European Debates on Citizenship, ed. by Kitromelides, P. M. (Florence 2014), p. 255–269.Google Scholar
Schulze, W., Reich und Türkengefahr im späten 16. Jahrhundert. Studien zu den politischen und gesellschaftlichen Auswirkungen einer äußeren Bedrohung (Munich 1978).Google Scholar
Scott, J., “The Rapture of Motion: James Harrington's Republicanism” in Political Discourse in Early Modern Britain, ed. by Phillipson, N. and Skinner, Q. (Cambridge 1993), p. 139–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scupin, H. U., “Der Begriff der Souveränität bei Johannes Althusius und bei Jean Bodin” in Der Staat 4 (1965), p. 1–26.Google Scholar
Seed, S., Ceremonies of Possession in Europe's Conquest of the New World, 1492–1640 (Cambridge 1995).Google Scholar
Seidler, M., “Natural Law and History Pufendorf's Philosophical Historiography” in History and the Disciplines. The Reclassification of Knowledge in Early Modern Europe, ed. by Kelley, D. R. (Rochester 1997), p. 203–222.Google Scholar
Seidler, M., “The Politics of Self-preservation: Toleration and Identity in Pufendorf and Locke” in Early Modern Natural Law Theories: Contexts and Strategies in the Early Enlightenment, ed. by Hochstrasser, T. and Schröder, P. (Dordrecht 2003), p. 227–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidler, M., “‘Wer mir gutes thut, den liebe ich’: Pufendorf on Patriotism and Political Loyalty” in ‘Patria’ und ‘Patrioten’ vor dem Patriotismus. Pflichten, Rechte, Glauben und die Rekonfigurierung europäischer Gemeinwesen im 17. Jahrhundert, ed. by Friedeburg, R. v. (Wiesbaden 2005), p. 335–365.Google Scholar
Seidler, M., “Monstrous Pufendorf: Sovereignty and System in the Dissertations” in Monarchism and Absolutism in Early Modern Europe, ed. by Cuttica, C. and Burgess, G. (London 2011), p. 159–175.Google Scholar
Sharp, A., “Alberico Gentili's obscure Resurrection as a Royalist in 1644” in Alberico Gentili l'ordine internazionale in un mondo a più civilità (Milan 2004), p. 285–313.Google Scholar
Shapin, S., A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-century England (Chicago 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaver, R. S., “Grotius on Scepticism and Self-Interest” in Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 78 (1996), p. 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmel, G., Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung (Berlin 1908).Google Scholar
Skinner, Q., “Some Problems in the Analysis of Political Thought and Action” in Political Theory 2 (1974), p. 277–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slomp, G., Carl Schmitt and the Politics of Hostility, Violence and Terror (Houndmills 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soman, A. (ed.), The Massacre of St Bartholomew. Reappraisals and Documents (The Hague 1974).Google Scholar
Sonenscher, M., “Republicanism, State Finance and the Emergence of Commercial Society in Eighteenth Century France or from Royal to Ancient Republicanism and Back” in Republicanism: A Shared European Heritage vol. II, ed. by Gelderen, M. v. and Skinner, Q. (Cambridge 2002), p. 275–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonnino, P., “The Origins of Louis XIV's Wars” in The Origins of War in Early Modern Europe, ed. by Black, J. (Edinburgh 1987), p. 112–131.Google Scholar
Sparkes, A. W., “Trust and Teleology: Locke's Politics and His Doctrine of Creation” in Canadian Journal of Philosophy 3 (1973), p. 263–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speltore, F., “Federalism in the History of Thought. Abbé de Saint-Pierre” in The Federalist. A Political Review 36 (1994), p. 221–235.Google Scholar
Stapelbroek, K., “Trade, Chartered Companies and Mercantile Associations” in The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law, ed. by Fassbender, B. and Peters, A. (Oxford 2012), p. 338–358.Google Scholar
Steensgaard, N., The Asian Trade Revolution of the Seventeenth Century: The East India Companies and the Decline of Caravan Trade (Chicago 1974).Google Scholar
Stelling-Michaud, S., “Ce que Jean-Jacques Rousseau doit à l'Abbé de Saint-Pierre” in Études sur le Contrat de Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Actes des Journées d'étude à Dijon pour la commemoration du 200e anniversaire du Contrat social (Paris 1964), p. 35–45.Google Scholar
Stelling-Michaud, S., “Écrits sur l'Abbé de Saint-Pierre” in Rousseau, Jean-Jacques,Œuvres complètes vol. III (Paris 1964), p. CXX–CLVIII.Google Scholar
Stelling-Michaud, S., “Notes et Variantes – Ècrits sur l'Abbé de Saint-Pierre” in Rousseau, Jean-Jacques,Œuvres complètes vol. III (Paris 1964), p. 1540–1574.Google Scholar
Stern, P. J., The Company-State: Corporative Sovereignty and the Early Modern Foundations of the British Empire in India (Oxford 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stollberg-Rilinger, B. (ed.), Spektakel der Macht: Rituale im alten Europa, 800 – 1800 (Darmstadt 2008).Google Scholar
Stollberg-Rilinger, B., The Emperor's Old Clothes. Constitutional History and the Symbolic Language of the Holy Roman Empire (Oxford 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolleis, M., Geschichte des öffentlichen Rechts in Deutschland 1600–1800 vol. 1 (Munich 1988).Google Scholar
Stolleis, M., “Löwe und Fuchs. Eine politische Maxime im Frühabsolutismus” in Staat und Staatsräson in der frühen Neuzeit, ed. by Stolleis, M. (Frankfurt am Main 1990), p. 21–36.Google Scholar
Stolleis, M., “Textor und Pufendorf über die Ratio Status Imperii im Jahre 1667” in Staat und Staatsräson in der frühen Neuzeit, ed. by Stolleis, M. (Frankfurt am Main 1990), p. 106–133.Google Scholar
Stolleis, M., “Veit Ludwig von Seckendorf” in Staatsdenker in der Frühen Neuzeit, ed. by Stolleis, M. (Munich 1995), p. 148–171.Google Scholar
Stoye, J., Strasbourg, ville libre royale 1681-1792. Exposition. Catalogue. (Strasbourg 1981).Google Scholar
Straumann, B., “Ancient Caesarian Lawyers in a State of Nature. Roman Tradition and Natural Rights in Hugo Grotius's De iure praede” in Political Theory 34 (2006), p. 328–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straumann, B., “The Right to Punish as Just Cause of War in Hugo Grotius's Natural Law” in Studies in the History of Ethics 2 (2006), p. 1–20.Google Scholar
Straumann, B., Hugo Grotius und die Antike Römisches Recht und römische Ethik im frühneuzeitlichen Naturrecht (Baden-Baden 2007).Google Scholar
Straumann, B., “Is Modern Liberty Ancient? Roman Remedies and Natural Rights in Hugo Grotius's Early Works on Natural Law” in Law and History Review 27 (2009), p. 55–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, G., “The Holy Roman Empire Revisited” in Central European History 11 (1978), p. 290–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strohmeyer, A., Theorie der Interaktion. Das europäische Gleichgewicht der Kräfte in der frühen Neuzeit (Wien 1994).Google Scholar
Strohmeyer, A., “Das Osmanishce Reich – ein Teil des europäischen Staatensystems der Frühen Neuzeit?” in Das Osmanische Reich und die Habsburgermonarchie, ed. by Kurz, M. and Scheutz, M. et al. (Wien, Munich 2005), p. 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strohmeyer, A., “Ideas of Peace in Early Modern Models of International Order: Universal Monarchy and Balance of Power in Comparison” in Peace, War and Gender from Antiquity to the Present. Cross-cultural Perspectives, ed. by Dülffer, J. and Frank, R. (Essen 2009), p. 65–80.Google Scholar
Tapié, V. L., “Quelques aspects généraux de la politique étrangère de Louis XIV” in XVIIe Siècle 46, 47 (1960), p. 1–28.Google Scholar
Ter Meulen, J., Der Gedanke der Internationalen Organisation in seiner Entwicklung 1300–1800 (The Hague 1917).Google Scholar
Teschke, B., The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics and the Making of Modern International Relations (London 2003).Google Scholar
Teschke, B., “Revisiting the ‘War-Makes-States’ Thesis: War, Taxation and Social Property Relations in Early Modern Europe” in War, the State and International Law in Seventeenth-Century Europe, ed. by Asbach, O. and Schröder, P. (Farnham 2010), p. 35–59.Google Scholar
Thomson, E., “The Dutch Miracle, Modified. Hugo Grotius's Mare Liberum, Commercial Governance and Imperial War in the Early-Seventeenth Century” in Grotiana 30 (2009), p. 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toyoda, T., Theory and Politics of the Law of Nations. Political Bias in International Law Discourse of Seven German Court Councilors in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (Leiden 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truman, R. W., Spanish Treatises on Government, Society and Religion in the Time of Philip II (Leiden 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, R., Natural Rights Theories. Their Origin and Development (Cambridge 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, R., “The ‘modern’ Theory of Natural Law” in The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe, ed. by Pagden, A. (Cambridge 1987), p. 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, R., The Rights of War and Peace. Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant (Oxford 1999).Google Scholar
Tully, J., “Rediscovering America: The Two Treatises and Aboriginal Rights” in An Approach to Political Philosophy: Locke in Contexts, ed. by Tully, J. (Cambridge 1993), p. 137–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vast, H., “Des tentatives de Louis XIV pour arriver à l'empire” in Revue historique LXV (1897), p. 1–45.Google Scholar
Viner, J., “Power versus Plenty as Objectives of Foreign Policy in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries” in Revisions in Mercantilism, ed. by Coleman, D. C. (London 1969), p. 61–91.Google Scholar
Wagner, A., “Francisco de Vitoria and Alberico Gentili on the Legal Character of the Global Commonwealth” in Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 31 (2011), p. 565–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, A., “Lessons of Imperialism and of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili's Early Modern Appeal to Roman Law” in The European Journal of International Law 23 (2012), p. 873–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. H., War and the State. The Theory of International Politics (Michigan 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whaley, J., Germany and the Holy Roman Empire: Maximilian I to the Peace of Westphalia, 1493–1648 (Oxford 2012).Google Scholar
Whaley, J., Germany and the Holy Roman Empire: The Peace of Westphalia to the Dissolution of the Reich, 1648–1806 (Oxford 2012).Google Scholar
Waissenberger, R. (ed.), Die Türken vor Wien. Europa und die Entscheidung an der Donau 1683 (Vienna 1983).Google Scholar
Waldron, J., “Ius gentium: A Defence of Gentili's Equation of the Law of Nations and the Law of Nature” in The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire, ed. by Kingsbury, B. and Straumann, B. (Oxford 2010), p. 283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallerstein, I., The Modern World-System II: Mercantilism and the Consolidation of the European World-Economy, 1600–1750 (New York 1980).Google Scholar
Walzer, M., Just and Unjust Wars. A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations (New York 1977).Google Scholar
Wandruzka, A., Reichspatriotismus und Reichspolitik zur Zeit des Prager Friedens von 1635 (Graz 1955).Google Scholar
Weber, H., “Die Bedeutung der Dynastien für die europäische Geschichte in der frühen Neuzeit” in Zeitschrift für bayerische Landesgeschichte 44 (1981), p. 5–32.Google Scholar
Weber, H., “Vom verdeckten zum offenen Krieg. Richelieus Kriegsgründe und Kriegsziele 1634/35” in Krieg und Politik 1618–1648, ed. by Repgen, K. (Munich 1988), p. 203–217.Google Scholar
Weber, H., “Une paix sûre et prompte. Die Friedenspolitik Richelieus” in Zwischenstaatliche Friedenswahrung in Mittelalter und Früher Neuzeit, ed. by Duchhardt, H. (Köln 1991), p. 111–129.Google Scholar
Weil, F. D., “The Stranger, Prudence, and Trust in Hobbes's Theory” in Theory and Society 15 (1986), p. 759–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weil, R., A Plague of Informers: Conspiracy and Political Trust in William III's England (New Haven 2013).Google Scholar
Welzel, H., Die Naturrechtslehre Samuel Pufendorfs. Ein Beitrag zur Ideengeschichte des 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts (Berlin 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weststeijn, A., Commercial Republicanism in the Dutch Golden Age: The Political Thought of Johan & Pieter de la Court (Leiden 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wette, W. (ed.), Der Krieg des kleinen Mannes. Eine Militärgeschichte von unten (Munich 1992).Google Scholar
Wheatcroft, A., The Enemy at the Gate: Habsburgs, Ottomans and the Battle for Europe (New York 2009).Google Scholar
Williams, M. C., “The Hobbesian Theory of International Relations: Three Traditions” in Classical Theory of International Relations, ed. by Jahn, B. (Cambridge 2006), p. 253–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M. C., “Recasting the Hobbesian Legacy in International Political Theory” in International Political Theory after Hobbes: Analysis, Interpretation and Orientation, ed. by Prokhovnik, R. and Slomp, G. (Houndmills 2011), p. 147–167.Google Scholar
Wilson, E., “The VOC, Corporate Sovereignty and the Republican Sub-Text of De jure Praede” in Grotiana 26–28 (2005–2007), p. 310–340.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. D., “Baldus de Ubaldis” in The Yale Law Journal 12 (1902), p. 8–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollenberg, J., Richelieu. Staatsräson und Kircheninteresse. Zur Legitimation der Politik des Kardinalpremier (Bielefeld 1977).Google Scholar
Worden, B., “English Republicanism” in The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700, ed. by Burns, J. H. and Goldie, M. (Cambridge 1991), p. 443–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worden, W., “James Harrington and ‘The Commonwealth of Oceana’, 1656” in Republicanism, Liberty and Commercial Society, 1649–1776, ed. by Wootton, D. (Stanford 1994), p. 82–138.Google Scholar
Wrede, M., Das Reich und seine Feinde. Politische Feindbilder in der reichspatriotischen Publizistik zwischen Westfälischem Frieden und Siebenjährigem Krieg (Mainz 2004).Google Scholar
Wright, J. K., A Classical Republican in Eighteenth Century France. The Political Thought of Mably (Stanford 1997).Google Scholar
Wright, J. K., “The Idea of a Republican Constitution in Old Régime France” in Republicanism: A Shared European Heritage vol. I, ed. by Gelderen, M. v. and Skinner, Q. (Cambridge 2002), p. 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, M. (ed.), Theory and Practice of the Balance of Power 1486–1914 (London 1974).Google Scholar
Wyduckel, D., Princeps Legibus Solutus. Eine Untersuchung zur frühmodernen Rechts- und Staatslehre (Berlin 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyduckel, D., “Recht, Staat und Frieden im Jus Publicum Europeaum” in Zwischenstaatliche Friedenswahrung in Mittelalter und Früher Neuzeit, ed. by Duchhardt, H. (Köln 1991), p. 185–204.Google Scholar
Yardeni, M., La conscience nationale en France pendant les guerres de religion, 1559–1598 (Paris 1971).Google Scholar
Yardeni, M., “French Calvinist Political Thought, 1534–1715” in International Calvinism 1541–1715, ed. by Prestwich, M. (Oxford 1985), p. 315–337.Google Scholar
Zagorin, P., “Hobbes without Grotius” in History of Political Thought 21 (2000), p. 16–40.Google Scholar
Zarka, Y. C., “Leibniz lecteur de Hobbes: Toute-puissance divine et perfection du monde” in Leibniz. Le Meilleur des mondes, Studia Leibnitiana, Sonderheft (Stuttgart 1992), p. 113–128.Google Scholar
Zeller, G., “Les rois de France candidats à l'Empire” in Revue historique 173 (1934), p. 237–311 and p. 457–534.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G., “Introduction” in Cicero, , On the Commonwealth, ed. by Zetzel, J. E. G. (Cambridge 2008), p. VII-XXIV.Google Scholar
Zupan, D., War, Morality, and Autonomy. An Investigation in Just War Theory (Farnham 2004).Google Scholar
Zurbuchen, S., Naturrecht und natürliche Religion. Zur Geschichte des Toleranzbegriffs von Samuel Pufendorf bis Jean-Jacques Rousseau (Würzburg 1991).Google Scholar
Zurbuchen, S., “Gewissensfreiheit und Toleranz: Zur Pufendorf-Rezeption bei Christian Thomasius” in Samuel von Pufendorf und die europäische Frühaufklärung, ed. by Palladini, F. and Hartung, G. (Berlin 1996), p. 169–180.Google Scholar
Zwiedineck-Südenhorst, H. v., Die öffentliche Meinung in Deutschland im Zeitalter Ludwigs XIV. 1650–1700 (Stuttgart 1888).Google Scholar
Zwierlein, C., Discorso und Lex Dei. Die Entstehung neuer Denkrahmen im 16. Jahrhundert und die Wahrnehmung der französischen Religionskriege in Italien und Deutschland (Göttingen 2006).Google Scholar