Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T18:04:04.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Patrimony not Equity: The Trust in Scotland

from PART II - PATRIMONY AND THE SCOTTISH TRUST

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2017

Kenneth G C Reid
Affiliation:
Professor of Scots Law, University of Edinburgh.
Get access

Summary

LAW AND EQUITY: A FALSE START

The opening words of William F Fratcher's volume on Trust in the International Encyclopaedia of Comparative Law are these:

The trust is a legal device developed in England whereby ownership of property is split between a person known as a trustee, who has the rights and powers of an owner, and a beneficiary, for whose exclusive benefit the trustee is bound to use those rights and powers.

This is a traditional definition. The trust, we are told, is English in origin, and its central feature is the division of ownership between trustee and beneficiary. At those words a lawyer from a civil law system is likely to be impressed but also discouraged: impressed, because the edifice of thought on which the English trust is based commands respect and admiration; discouraged, because a device which depends on a division of dominium into legal and equitable ownership is not only unsuitable for transplantation to civilian soil: it is barely comprehensible.

Trust law need not be like this. Indeed the argument of this chapter is that trust law is not like this. Even in English law the legal/equitable duality may no longer be the most important characteristic of the trust. But in any event trusts are not confined to English law, or to common law systems based on that law. Scotland, a mixed jurisdiction, has known the trust since at least the seventeenth century. In other mixed jurisdictions, notably South Africa, Quebec and Sri Lanka, trusts began to appear in the nineteenth century, with Louisiana following after the First World War. The law of property in mixed legal systems is always civilian; like civil law countries, they do not have a separate system of equity, or acknowledge the distinction between legal and beneficial ownership; and yet all mixed systems have the trust.

Where mixed legal systems led, the civil law world in due course began to follow. Most of the early development was in Latin America – in Colombia (1923), Panama (1925), Chile (1925), Mexico (1926), Bolivia (1928), Peru (1931), Costa Rica (1936), Venezuela (1940), Nicaragua (1940), Guatemala (1946), Ecuador (1948) and Honduras (1950). In the civilian parts of Asia only Japan adopted the trust, in 1922, and the institution was largely ignored in continental Europe with the exception of tiny Liechtenstein (1926).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Edinburgh University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×