Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T22:47:29.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Côte d'Ivoire since 1993

The Risky Reinvention of a Nation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2013

Francis Akindès
Affiliation:
University of Bouakè
Abdul Raufu Mustapha
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Lindsay Whitfield
Affiliation:
Danish Institute of International Studies, Copenhagen
Get access

Summary

Côte d'Ivoire and Senegal were the jewels in the crown of the French colonial empire in West Africa. Both shared many colonial experiences based on the panterritoriality of the colonial empire. The rivalry between African nationalist politicians in both countries was a feature of the decolonisation process. Senegal prided itself as the political and cultural centre of French West Africa, due to the cultural sophistication of its évolué elite and the fact that the Governor-General of all the territories was based in Dakar. Côte d'Ivoire, on the other hand, saw itself as the real power-house of the economy of the colonial empire. Importantly, however, the post-colonial settlements in both countries were radically different. Post-colonial Senegal had a greater institutionalisation of formal and informal threads connecting society to the state, while Côte d'Ivoire developed a more elitist, more ethnic, and more personalised post-colonial regime centred on the person of President Houphouet-Boigny. This difference was to have important ramifications for their experiences of democratisation. Both continued to depend heavily on France, while being held up as models of post-colonial development in Africa: Senegal for its tolerant, almost liberal political orientation, and Côte d'Ivoire as a haven of stability and an African economic ‘miracle’. The trajectory of democratisation has been radically different in both countries. Senegalese democratisation is a gradual process of decompression, deliberately initiated from the top, starting in 1978. Ivorian democratisation, on the other hand, came about as a result of unanticipated shocks to the Houphouetist post-colonial paradigm.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Boydell & Brewer
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×