References

Dinshaw Mistry

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139683487.015

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2014

Dinshaw Mistry

Show author details

Dinshaw Mistry: Affiliation:
University of Cincinnati

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: The US–India Nuclear Agreement
Diplomacy and Domestic Politics
, pp. 257 - 270

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139683487.015 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abraham, Itty. 1998. The Making of the Indian Atomic Bomb: Science, Secrecy, and the Postcolonial State. New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar

Abraham, Mohit. 2012. ‘Defective Law on Nuclear Liability’. The Economic Times, 20 December.Google Scholar

Aiyar, Shankkar. 2008a. ‘It’s Dealtime, Folks’. India Today, 10 July.Google Scholar

Aiyar, Shankkar. 2008b. ‘It is 275’. India Today, 22 July.Google Scholar

Albright, David and Brannan, Paul. 2008. Indian Nuclear Export Controls and Information Security: Important Questions Remain. Washington, DC: Institute for Science and International Security.Google Scholar

Albright, David and Brannan, Paul. 2011. Pakistan Doubling Rate of Making Nuclear Weapons: Time for Pakistan to Reverse Course. Washington, DC: Institute for Science and International Security.Google Scholar

Anderson, Robert. 2010. Nucleus and Nation: Scientists, International Networks, and Power in India. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Arms Control Association (ACA). 2007. ‘Ensure Nuclear Cooperation with India is Consistent with the Law’. 14 May.Google Scholar

Arms Control Association (ACA). 2008a. ‘Rice’s Pledge to Make Global Rules on Nuclear Trade with India “Consistent” with U.S. Law Requires Shift in U.S. Policy’. 14 February.Google Scholar

Arms Control Association (ACA). 2008b. ‘Decision Time on the Indian Nuclear Deal: Help Avert a Nonproliferation Disaster’. 15 August.Google Scholar

Arms Control Association (ACA). 2008c. ‘US–India Nuclear Cooperation Agreement: A Bad Deal’. 17 September.Google Scholar

Arms Control Today. 2011. ‘The South Asian Nuclear Balance: An Interview with Pakistani Ambassador to the CD Zamir Akram’. December.Google Scholar

Aronson, Bernard. 2012. ‘Can Brazil Stop Iran’. The New York Times, 3 April.Google Scholar

Asia Society. 2006. ‘President Addresses Asia Society,’ Washington, DC, February 22.Google Scholar

Bagchi, Indrani. 2004. ‘Changing the Nuke Order’. India Today, 15 March.Google Scholar

Bagchi, Indrani. 2005. ‘N-Separation Plan Ready’. The Times of India, 19 December.Google Scholar

Bagchi, Indrani. 2006. ‘India, US Fast Breeding N-deal’. The Times of India, 20 February.Google Scholar

Bagchi, Indrani. 2008. ‘Austria, Ireland against NSG Waiver for India’. The Times of India, 6 September.Google Scholar

Bagla, Pallava. 2006. ‘The Fast Breeder Program Just Cannot be Put on the Civilian List’. The Indian Express, 8 February.Google Scholar

Bajpai, K. Shankar. 2008. ‘Growing Up’. Hindustan Times, 8 September.Google Scholar

Baru, Sanjaya. 2009a. ‘Can Indian Think Tanks and Research Institutions Cope with the Rising Demand for Foreign and Security Policy Research’. ISAS Working Paper No. 67, 16 June.Google Scholar

Baru, Sanjaya. 2009b. ‘The Influence of Business and Media on Indian Foreign Policy’. India Review 8 (3): 266–85.CrossRef Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Frank R., Berry, Jeffrey, Hojnacki, Marie, Kimball, David, and Leech, Beth. 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bhatt, Sheela. 2008. ‘How the Trust Vote was Won’. rediff.com, 26 July.Google Scholar

Bhushan, Bharat. 2005. ‘The Truth about the Indo-US Nuclear Deal’. The Telegraph, 14 November.Google Scholar

Blackwill, Robert. 2005. ‘The India Imperative’. National Interest, 80: 8–16.Google Scholar

Boese, Wade. 2006. ‘Reshaping U.S. Nonproliferation Strategy: An Interview with Undersecretary of State Robert Joseph’. Arms Control Today, 36 (5):Google Scholar

Boyle, David, Miller, Warren, and Nelson, Paul. 2007. ‘U.S.–India Nuclear Alert’. The Washington Times, 15 July.Google Scholar

Brinkley, Joel. 2005. ‘U.S. Nuclear Deal with India Criticized by G.O.P. in Congress’. The New York Times, 31 October.Google Scholar

Burns, Nicholas. 2007a. ‘Heady Times for India and the US’. The Washington Post, 29 April.Google Scholar

Burns, Nicholas. 2007b. ‘America’s Strategic Opportunity with India’. Foreign Affairs, 86 (6): 131–146.Google Scholar

Bush, George W. 1999. ‘A Distinctly American Internationalism’. Speech at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library, Simi Valley, California, 19 November.Google Scholar

Carter, Jimmy. 2006. ‘A Dangerous Deal with India’. The Washington Post, 29 March.Google Scholar

Carter, Jimmy. 2008. ‘India Deal Puts World at Risk’. International Herald Tribune, 11 September.Google Scholar

Cha, Victor. 2009. ‘What do They Really Want: Obama’s North Korea Conundrum’. Washington Quarterly 32 (4): 119–38.CrossRef Google Scholar

Chatterjee, Manini. 2007. ‘Anguished PM to Left: If You Want to Withdraw, So Be It’. The Telegraph, 11 August.Google Scholar

Chaudhry, Pramit Pal. 2007. ‘Peter Pan Syndrome’. Hindustan Times, 27 August.Google Scholar

Chellaney, Brahma. 2008. ‘A Flawed Safeguards Accord’. The Asian Age, 11 July.Google Scholar

Chellaney, Brahma. 2010. ‘Full Official Text and Key Features of U.S.–India Reprocessing Agreement’. 30 March.Google Scholar

Chengappa, Raj. 2007. ‘How the Deal was Clinched’. India Today, 27 August.Google Scholar

Cigler, Alan and Loomis, Burdett, eds. 2011. Interest Group Politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

CNN-IBN. 2008. ‘US Envoy Says “Now or Never” for Nuclear Deal’. 9 February, http://ibnlive.in.com/news/its-now-or-never-for-nuclear-deal-mulford/58530-3-1.html.Google Scholar

Cohen, Avner. 2010.The Worst-kept Secret: Israel’s Bargain with the Bomb. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, Stephen. 2001. India: Emerging Power. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, William. 2007. ‘The Indian Giver’. The Wall Street Journal, 5 February.Google Scholar

Congress Sandesh. 2006. ‘A Historic Deal’. Editorial, March, Page 4.Google Scholar

Council on Foreign Relations. 2005. ‘Scheinman: New U.S.–India Agreement Undercuts U.S. Allegiance to Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons’. 3 November.Google Scholar

David, Steven. 1991. Choosing Sides: Alignment and Realignment in the Third World. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Department of Commerce. 2003. ‘United States and India Hold Talks on Stimulating High-technology Commerce’. 2 July.Google Scholar

Department of State. 2005. ‘Background Briefing by Administration Officials on U.S.-South Asia Relations’. Washington, DC, March 25.Google Scholar

DNA. 2007. ‘Brajesh Mishra Says Deal Can Be Rescued’. 22 October.Google Scholar

DNA. 2008. ‘India Enters N-Club’. 6 September.Google Scholar

Embassy of India. 2005. ‘Media Briefing by Foreign Secretary Shyam Saran’. Washington, DC, 14 April.Google Scholar

Emmott, Bill. 2008. ‘New Life for the India Nuclear Pact’. The Washington Post, 7 July.Google Scholar

Energy Information Agency. 2006. Annual Energy Outlook 2006. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy.Google Scholar

Entman, Robert. 2004. Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion and US Foreign Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Evans, Peter, Jacobson, Harold, and Putnam, Robert, eds. 1993. Double-edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ferguson, Charles and Levi, Michael. 2006. U.S.–India Nuclear Cooperation: A Strategy for Moving Forward. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar

Frey, Karsten. 2006. India’s Nuclear Bomb and National Security. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Friedman, Thomas. 2006. ‘Letting India in the Club?’ The New York Times, 8 March.Google Scholar

Fuhrman, Matthew. 2012. Atomic Assistance: How ‘Atoms for Peace’ Programs Cause Nuclear Insecurity. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Gahlaut, Seema. 2008. Indian Export Control Policy: Political Commitment, Institutional Capacity, and Nonproliferation Record. Athens, GA: Center for International Trade and Security.Google Scholar

Gandhi, Sonia. 2006. ‘Letter to Congress Workers’. Congress Sandesh, March, Page 1.Google Scholar

Gentleman, Amelia and Shanker, Thom. 2006. ‘India Welcomes U.S. Senate’s Approval of Nuclear Pact’. The New York Times, 17 November.Google Scholar

George, Varghese. 2007. ‘Behind PM’s Isolation on Nuclear Deal: Wary Allies and a Nervous Party’. The Indian Express, 16 October.Google Scholar

Global Security Institute. 2008. ‘Letter from the GSI and Middle Powers Initiative to NSG States’, 13 August.Google Scholar

Gopalakrishnan, A. 2006a. ‘A Question of Nuclear Separation’. The Asian Age, 14 January.Google Scholar

Gopalakrishnan, A. 2006b. ‘Don’t Compromise India’s Dignity’. The Asian Age, 1 March.Google Scholar

Gopalakrishnan, A. 2006c. ‘A Deal of Broken Assurances’. The Asian Age, 7 July.Google Scholar

Gopalakrishnan, A. 2006d. ‘What PM Told Us on the N-Deal’. The Asian Age, 22 September.Google Scholar

Gopalakrishnan, A. 2006e. ‘Bill Paves Way for Covert US Operations’. The Asian Age, 21 November.Google Scholar

Gopalakrishnan, A. 2006f. ‘Was the Government Aware of Section 115?’ The Asian Age, 28 November.Google Scholar

Gopalakrishnan, A. 2007a. ‘PM Must be Careful about Nuclear Pitfalls’. The Asian Age, 1 June.Google Scholar

Gopalakrishnan, A. 2007b. ‘N-deal: Parliament Must have Decisive Authority’. rediff.com, 20 July.Google Scholar

Gould, Harold and Ganguly, Sumit, eds. 1992. The Hope and the Reality: US–India Relations from Roosevelt to Reagan. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Government of India. 2005.Press Release, 26 March.Google Scholar

Government of India. 2006. ‘PM Conveys Persisting Indian Concerns to US President’. Press Release, 21 December.Google Scholar

Government of India. 2008. ‘Statement by External Affairs Minister of India Mr. Pranab Mukherjee on the Civil Nuclear Initiative’. 5 September.Google Scholar

Grimmett, Richard. 2012. Conventional Arms Transfers to Developing Countries 2004–2011. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar

Gupta, Shishir. 2007. ‘BJP Reserves its Comment on N-deal but Praises UPA Negotiators for “Superb Job”’. The Indian Express, 27 July.Google Scholar

Gupta, Shishir. 2008. ‘Pokharan-III’. The Indian Express, 9 May.Google Scholar

Gupta, Shishir and Samanta, Pranab Dhal. 2006. ‘After Kakodkar Meets PM, Cabinet Secretary Steps in’. The Indian Express, 9 February.Google Scholar

Gupta, Smita. 2008a. ‘All Hands on Deck’. Outlook India, 28 July.Google Scholar

Gupta, Smita. 2008b. ‘Well Begun, Half Done’. Outlook India, 4 August.Google Scholar

Haniffa, Aziz. 2007. ‘Why Nicholas Burns Put off India Visit’. rediff.com, 23 May.Google Scholar

Haniffa, Aziz. 2008a. ‘N-Deal: Experts Urge Senate Leader to Act Soon’. rediff.com, 22 September.Google Scholar

Haniffa, Aziz. 2008b. ‘We Want the Agreement to Satisfy You, Bush Tells PM’. rediff.com, 26 September.Google Scholar

Haniffa, Aziz. 2012. ‘Explained: Why Indo-US Nuclear Deal is in Cold Storage’. rediff.com, 11 June.CrossRef Google Scholar

Harrison, Selig. 2001. ‘No More Sanctions’. The Washington Times, 5 April.Google Scholar

Hawkins, William. 2008. ‘U.S.–India Nuclear Bond?’ The Washington Times, 21 September.Google Scholar

Hibbs, Mark. 2007. ‘Delays Expected in Closing on US–India Pact’. Nucleonics Week, 20 September.Google Scholar

Hibbs, Mark. 2008a. ‘NSG Prepares to Set Specific Conditions for Lifting Sanctions Against India’. Nuclear Fuels, 14 January.Google Scholar

Hibbs, Mark. 2008b. ‘New Zealand Floats Conditioning India NSG Exemption on Protocol’. Nuclear Fuels, 28 January.Google Scholar

Hibbs, Mark. 2008c. ‘US Steps up Bilateral Diplomacy to Get India Safeguards Approval’. Nucleonics Week, 10 July.Google Scholar

Hibbs, Mark. 2008d. ‘US Pressing for NSG Exemption for India by End of this Week’. Nucleonics Week, 21 August.Google Scholar

Hibbs, Mark. 2008e. ‘NSG States Raise Compliance Issues on India Exemption’. Nuclear Fuels, 25 August.Google Scholar

Hibbs, Mark. 2008f. ‘NSG States Seek Many Changes to US Draft Resolution Exempting India’. Nucleonics Week, 28 August 2008.Google Scholar

Hibbs, Mark. 2010. ‘Moving Forward on the U.S.–India Nuclear Deal’. Issue Brief, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 5 April.Google Scholar

Hibbs, Mark and Horner, Daniel. 2006. ‘NSG Countries Not Prepared to Challenge US Over India Nuclear Trade’. Nucleonics Week, 29 June.Google Scholar

Hibbs, Mark and Horner, Daniel. 2007. ‘India-Specific Provisions may be Non-Binding Part of IAEA Agreement’. Nuclear Fuels, 3 December.Google Scholar

Hibbs, Mark and Horner, Daniel. 2008. ‘Pakistan, Other States Not Satisfied after Indian Briefing on IAEA Pact’. Nucleonics Week, 24 July.Google Scholar

Hibbs, Mark and Machlachlan, Ann. 2007. ‘NSG Members Asked France, Russia about Their Negotiations with India’. Nuclear Fuels, 3 December.Google Scholar

Hibbs, Mark and Saraf, Sunil. 2008. ‘Nuclear Deal with US Falters as Indians Head for the Polls’. Nucleonics Week, 5 June.Google Scholar

Hindustan Times. 1998. ‘India Seeks Changes in Hi-tech Transfer Over CTBT’. 17 September.Google Scholar

Hindustan Times. 2006. ‘An Opaque and Unequal Deal’. Editorial, 28 January.Google Scholar

Hindustan Times. 2007a. ‘Hyde and Seek’. Editorial, 8 August.Google Scholar

Hindustan Times. 2007b. ‘Don’t Allow N-Deal to be Hijacked by Opponents: Scientists’. 30 August.Google Scholar

Hindustan Times. 2008a. ‘The Nuclear Deal’. Editorial, March 23Google Scholar

Hindustan Times. 2008b. ‘Actively Inactive’. Editorial, May 27.Google Scholar

Hindustan Times. 2008c. ‘India Intrigued by Bush Observation’. 12 September.Google Scholar

Hymans, Jacques. 2006. The Psychology of Nuclear Proliferation: Identity, Emotions, and Foreign Policy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hymans, Jacques. 2011. ‘Veto Players, Nuclear Energy, and Nonproliferation: Domestic Institutional Barriers to a Japanese Bomb’. International Security 36 (2): 154–189.CrossRef Google Scholar

Iida, Keisuke. 1993. ‘When and How do Domestic Constraints Matter? Two-level Games with Uncertainty’. Journal of Conflict Resolution 37 (3): 403–26.CrossRef Google Scholar

Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (IDSA). 2006. ‘Indo-US Nuclear Deal: The Bill and Apprehensions’. Occasional Paper, November.Google Scholar

Iyengar, P. K. 2008a. ‘Ten Misconceptions about the Nuclear Deal’. 22 July.Google Scholar

Iyengar, P. K. 2008b. ‘True Colors of the Nuclear Deal’. 30 September.Google Scholar

Iyengar, P. K. 2009. ‘Non-Fissile Doubts’. Outlook, 26 October.Google Scholar

Iyengar, P. K., Prasad, A. N., Gopalakrishnan, A., and Karnad, Bharat. 2009. Strategic Sellout: Indian-US Nuclear Deal. New Delhi: Pentagon Press.Google Scholar

Jaishankar, Dhruva. 2009. ‘Chronicle of a Deal Foretold: Washington’s Perspective in Negotiating the Indo-US Nuclear Agreement’. In Indo-US Nuclear Deal: Seeking Synergy in Bilateralism, edited by Chari, P. R., 99–122. New Delhi: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar

Juster, Kenneth. 2003. ‘Stimulating High-technology Cooperation with India’. Remarks at the US–India Business Council, New York, 2 June.Google Scholar

Juster, Kenneth. 2004. ‘Keynote Remarks of Kenneth Juster, Undersecretary of Commerce, at the India–United States Conference on Space Science, Applications, and Commerce’. Bangalore, 22 June.Google Scholar

Kamdar, Mira. 2008. ‘Risking Armageddon for Cold, Hard Cash’. The Washington Post, 7 September.Google Scholar

Karat, Prakash. 2006. ‘Why Avoid Sense of Parliament?’ People’s Democracy, 13 August.Google Scholar

Karnad, Bharat. 2005. ‘Remember the Tritium’. Deccan Chronicle, 7 August.Google Scholar

Karnad, Bharat. 2006. ‘Nuclear Testing is the Crux’. The Asian Age, 19 December.Google Scholar

Karnad, Bharat. 2007. ‘Is N-testing a Purely Political Decision?’ The Asian Age, 9 January.Google Scholar

Karnad, Bharat. 2008a. ‘Safeguards that Erode Security’. Mint, 14 July.Google Scholar

Karnad, Bharat. 2008b. India’s Nuclear Policy. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Kelley, Donald. 2005. Divided Power: The Presidency, Congress, and the Formation of American Foreign Policy. Fayetteville, AR: University of Arkansas Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kerr, Paul. 2011. Pakistan’s Nuclear Weapons: Proliferation and Security Issues. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar

Kessler, Glenn. 2007. The Confidante: Condoleezza Rice and the Creation of the Bush Legacy. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar

Kessler, Glenn and Slevin, Peter. 2003. ‘Washington Post Reporters Interview Powell’. The Washington Post, 3 October.Google Scholar

Khare, Harish. 2005. ‘Team Manmohan at Work, at Last’. The Hindu, 8 August.Google Scholar

Khare, Harish and Varadarajan, Siddharth. 2007a. ‘NSA Interview: This is as Good a Text as One Can Possibly Get’. The Hindu, 28 July.Google Scholar

Khare, Harish and Varadarajan, Siddharth. 2007b. ‘For Nuclear Renaissance, the World Needs India’. The Hindu, 10 August.Google Scholar

Kimball, Daryll. 2007. ‘Introductory Note: Henry J. Hyde United States/India Peaceful Atomic Energy Cooperation Act of 2006’. International Legal Materials 46 (March): 409–14.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kimball, Daryll and Cirincione, Joseph. 2006. A Nonproliferation Disaster. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.Google Scholar

King, Gary, Keohane, Robert, and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kissel, Mary. 2007. ‘Delhi Drama’. The Wall Street Journal, 4 September.Google Scholar

Knopf, Jeffrey. 1998. Domestic Society and International Cooperation: The Impact of Protest on U.S. Arms Control Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Koithara, Verghese. 2012. Managing India’s Nuclear Forces. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar

Kollman, Ken. 1998. Outside Lobbying: Public Opinion and Interest Group Strategies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Krepon, Michael. 2008. ‘Likely Consequences of the Nuclear Suppliers Group Decision’. The Henry L. Stimson Center, 8 September.Google Scholar

Kroenig, Matthew, 2010. Exporting the Bomb: Technology Transfer and the Spread of Nuclear Weapons. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kux, Dennis. 1993. Estranged Democracies: India and the United States, 1941–1991. Washington, DC: National Defense University Press.Google Scholar

Kumar, Vinay. 2008. ‘Left Parties Reject Compromise Formula’. The Hindu, 25 June.Google Scholar

Lakshmi, Rama. 2008. ‘In India, Outcry over US Letter’. The Washington Post, 4 September.Google Scholar

Lavoy, Peter. 2008. ‘Islamabad’s Nuclear Posture: Its Premises and Implementation’. In Pakistan’s Nuclear Future: Worries Beyond War, edited by Sokolski, Henry D., 129–165. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute.Google Scholar

Lawyers Alliance for World Security. 2007a. ‘Can President Bush Refuse to Follow the Expressed Will of Congress Concerning Nuclear Exports to India?’, 17 January.Google Scholar

Lawyers Alliance for World Security. 2007b. ‘New U.S.–India Nuclear Agreement Delayed: Indefinitely?’, 18 April.Google Scholar

Laxman, Srinivas. 2006. ‘N-scientists Rubbish Compromise Formula’. The Times of India, 23 February.Google Scholar

Left Stand on the Nuclear Deal: Notes Exchanged in the UPA–Left Committee on India–US Civil Nuclear Cooperation. 2008. New Delhi: Progressive Printers.Google Scholar

Limaye, Satu. 1993. U.S.–Indian Relations: The Pursuit of Accommodation. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Limaye, Satu. 2002. ‘US–India Relations: Visible to the Naked Eye’. CSIS Issue Brief.Google Scholar

Lindsay, James. 2003. ‘Deference and Defiance: The Shifting Rhythms of Executive– Legislative Relations in Foreign Policy’. Presidential Studies Quarterly 33 (3): 530–46.CrossRef Google Scholar

Malik, V. P. 2007. ‘Read 123 Fine Print and Rest Easy’. The Indian Express, 20 August. Martin, Lisa. 2000. Democratic Commitments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

McMahon, Robert. 1994. The Cold War on the Periphery: The United States, India, and Pakistan. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Menon, Shiv Shankar and Nayar, K. P.. 2008. ‘How the Nuke Wall was Scaled in Vienna—Moves that Softened China, Austria, and New Zealand’. The Telegraph, 8 September.Google Scholar

Miller, Manjari Chatterjee. 2013. ‘India’s Feeble Foreign Policy’. Foreign Affairs (May/June) 92 (3): 14–19.Google Scholar

Milner, Helen. 1997. Interests, Institutions and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Mishra, Brajesh. 2003. ‘India, United States, and the New World Order’. Speech at the Council on Foreign Relations, New York, 7 May.Google Scholar

Mistry, Dinshaw. 2013. ‘The India Lobby and the Nuclear Agreement with India’. Political Science Quarterly (Winter) 128 (4).CrossRef Google Scholar

Mitra, Amit. 2010. ‘Sabotaging India’s Rise’. The Times of India, 10 April.Google Scholar

Mo, Jongryn. 1994. ‘The Logic of Two-level Games with Endogenous Domestic Coalitions’. Journal of Conflict Resolution 38 (3): 402–22.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mohan, C. Raja. 2006a. Impossible Allies: The United States, India, and the Global Order. Delhi: India Research Press.Google Scholar

Mohan, C. Raja. 2006b. ‘Half Reactions and Easy Solutions’. The Indian Express, 11 February.Google Scholar

Mohan, C. Raja. 2006c. ‘What? We Worry?’ The Indian Express, 1 July.Google Scholar

Mohan, C. Raja. 2009. ‘The Making of Indian Foreign Policy: The Role of Scholarship and Public Opinion’. Paper prepared for the conference on Upgrading International Studies in India, Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, Singapore, 26 March.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew. 1993. ‘Armaments among Allies: European Weapons Cooperation, 1975–85’. In Double-edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics, edited by Evans, Peter, Jacobson, Harold, and Putnam, Robert, 128–167. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew. 2003. ‘Theory Synthesis in International Relations: Real Not Metaphysical’. International Studies Review 5 (1): 131–36.CrossRef Google Scholar

Narang, Vipin and Staniland, Paul. 2012. ‘Institutions and Worldviews in Indian Foreign Security Policy’. India Review 11 (2): 76–94.CrossRef Google Scholar

Nayar, K. P. 2008. ‘Secret Nuke Talks with US—Madrid Mission brought Menon and Burns Together’. The Telegraph, 8 January.Google Scholar

New Zealand Herald. 2008. ‘NZ Backs Nuclear Exemption for India after US Pressure’. 8 September.Google Scholar

Nuclear Fuels. 2007. ‘NSG Not Prepared to Quickly Respond to US Pressure on Exemption for India’. 30 July.Google Scholar

Nucleonics Week. 2008. ‘Scope of NSG Exemption for India Yet to be Defined by Member States’. 11 September.Google Scholar

Observer Research Foundation. 2005. ‘India’s Vote in the IAEA: The Balance Sheet’. Issue brief No. 5, November.Google Scholar

Pant, Harsh. 2011. The US–India Nuclear Pact: Policy, Process, and Great Power Politics. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Parsi, Trita. 2011. A Single Roll of the Dice: Obama’s Diplomacy with Iran. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Paul, T. V. and Shankar, Mahesh. 2007. ‘Why the US–India Nuclear Accord is a Good Deal’. Survival 49 (4): 111–22.CrossRef Google Scholar

People’s Democracy. 2005a. ‘Unbalanced & Inequitable’. Editorial, 24 July.Google Scholar

People’s Democracy. 2005b. ‘Discussion in Parliament on US–India Agreements: Statement by Nilotpal Basu in the Rajya Sabha’. 14 August.Google Scholar

People’s Democracy. 2006. ‘US Legislation on Nuclear Deal Not Acceptable’. Editorial, 17 December.Google Scholar

People’s Democracy. 2007a. ‘Reject US Terms for Nuclear Cooperation’. Editorial, 13 May.Google Scholar

People’s Democracy. 2007b. ‘Nuclear Deal: Don’t Hide the Hyde Act’. Editorial, 17 June.Google Scholar

Perkovich, George. 1999. India’s Nuclear Bomb. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Perkovich, George. 2005. Faulty Promises: The US–India Nuclear Deal. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar

Prasad, A. N. 2008. ‘Remote Control in US Hands’. Deccan Herald, 13 July.Google Scholar

Putnam, Robert. 1988. ‘Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-level Games’. International Organization 42 (3): 427–60.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rajaraman, R. 2005. ‘India–U.S. Deal and the Nuclear Ceiling’. The Hindu, 10 September.Google Scholar

Rajaraman, R. 2006. ‘Who’s Afraid of the Nuke Deal?’ The Indian Express, 14 February.Google Scholar

Rajghatta, Chidanand and Bagchi, Indrani. 2007. ‘US Hawks Slam “Greedy” India over Nuclear Deal’. The Times of India, 13 April.Google Scholar

Ram, N. 2007. ‘The Nuclear Deal: Key Issues and Political Circumstances’. The Hindu, 22 August.Google Scholar

Ramachandran, R. 2005. ‘Behind the Bargain’. Frontline, 30 July–12 August.Google Scholar

Ramachandran, R. 2007. ‘Long Haul Ahead’. Frontline, 16–29 June.Google Scholar

Ramakrishnan, Venkatesh and Ramachandran, R.. 2008. ‘Interview with Prakash Karat: Total Violation of Committee’s Decision’. Frontline, 5–18 July.Google Scholar

Ramanna, M. V. 2009. ‘India’s Nuclear Enclave and the Practice of Secrecy’. In South Asian Cultures of the Bomb, edited by Abraham, Itty, 41–67. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Ramanna, M. V., Mian, Zia, Nayyar, A.H., and Rajaraman, R.. 2006. ‘Fissile Materials in South Asia and the Implications of the U.S.–India Nuclear Deal’. Science and Global Security 14 (2–3): 117–45.Google Scholar

Ravi, N. 2005. ‘A Persistent Irritant Goes with a Grand Bargain’. The Hindu, 30 July.Google Scholar

rediff.com. 2005. ‘Don’t Raise Iran at UNSC, Left Warns Govt’. 28 September.Google Scholar

rediff.com. 2006. ‘Burns–Saran talks: Progress Made but Not Enough’. 24 February.Google Scholar

rediff.com. 2008. ‘Let the Nuclear Deal Go through: Brajesh Mishra’. 27 February.Google Scholar

Rice, Condoleezza. 2000. ‘Promoting the National Interest’. Foreign Affairs 79 (1): 45–62.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rice, Condoleezza. 2011. No Higher Honor: A Memoir of My Years in Washington. New York: Crown Publishing Group.Google Scholar

Rublee, Maria Rost. 2009. Nonproliferation Norms: Why States Choose Nuclear Restraint. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rumsfeld, Donald. 2011. Known and Unknown. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Sagan, Scott. 1996–97. ‘Why do States build Nuclear Weapons: Three Models in Search of a Bomb’. International Security 21 (3): 54–86.CrossRef Google Scholar

Samanta, Pranab. 2007. ‘Last Lap in Nuclear Deal Gets Slippery: India, US will Hardtalk in Ten Days’. The Indian Express, 18 March.Google Scholar

Santhanam, K. and Parthasarathi, Ashok. 2009. ‘Pokhran-II Thermonuclear Test, a Failure’. The Hindu, 17 September.Google Scholar

Sartori, Giovanni. 1997. Comparative Constitutional Engineering. New York: NYU Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schaffer, Teresita. 2009. India and the United States in the 21st Century: Reinventing Partnership. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.Google Scholar

Scott, James and Carter, Ralph. 2002. ‘Acting on the Hill: Congressional Assertiveness in U.S. Foreign Policy’. Congress & the Presidency 29 (2): 151–69.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sebenius, James and Singh, Michael. 2012. ‘Is a Nuclear Deal with Iran Possible? An Analytical Framework for the Iran Nuclear Negotiations’. International Security 37 (3): 52–91.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sikri, Rajiv. 2009. Challenge and Strategy: Rethinking India’s Foreign Policy. New Delhi: Sage.CrossRef Google Scholar

Singh, Jaswant. 1998. ‘Against Nuclear Apartheid’. Foreign Affairs 77 (5): 41–52.CrossRef Google Scholar

Singh, Jaswant. 1999. Defending India. New York: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Singh, V. P. 2006. ‘Respect Concerns of Nuclear Scientists: Open Letter to the Prime Minister’. rediff.com, 21 February.Google Scholar

Singh, V. P. 2007. ‘Parliament vs PM’. India Today, 19 October.Google Scholar

Sinha, Yashwant. 2005. ‘Indo-U.S. Nuclear Deal is Unequal’. The Asian Age, 25 August.Google Scholar

Sokolski, Henry. 2008. ‘Negotiating India’s Next Nuclear Explosion’. The Wall Street Journal Asia, 10 July.Google Scholar

Solingen, Etel. 2007. Nuclear Logics: Contrasting Paths in East Asia and the Middle East. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Squassoni, Sharon. 2006. ‘U.S.–India Nuclear Cooperation: A Side-by-Side Comparison of Current Legislation’. CRS Report for Congress, 22 November.Google Scholar

Srinivasan, M. R. 2008a. ‘Nuclear Ground Realities’. The Indian Express, 28 March.Google Scholar

Srinivasan, M. R. 2008b. ‘France, Russia Will Give Fuel if US Doesn’t’. The Economic Times, 17 September.Google Scholar

Srinivasan, M. R. 2012. ‘A Liability for Our Nuclear Plans’. The Hindu, 15 October.Google Scholar

Subrahmanyam, K. 2005a. ‘Vote in Vienna: A Correct Stand’. The Tribune, 26 September.Google Scholar

Subrahmanyam, K. 2005b. ‘India and the Nuclear Deal’. The Times of India, 12 December.Google Scholar

Subrahmanyam, K. 2005c. ‘Will Partisan Politics Nuke a Good Deal?’ The Times of India, 22 July.Google Scholar

Subrahmanyam, K. 2006. ‘Costs of Rejection’. The Times of India, 25 July.Google Scholar

Subrahmanyam, K. 2007. ‘The Right to Test Again’. The Indian Express, 20 November.Google Scholar

Subrahmanyam, K. 2008a. ‘NDA Should Rise Above Parochial Concerns on Nuclear Issue’. 9 April.Google Scholar

Subrahmanyam, K. 2008b. ‘Unbound By the Rules’. The Indian Express, 9 August.Google Scholar

Subrahmanyam, K. 2008c. ‘We’re Not a Rogue State’. The Times of India, 3 September.Google Scholar

Subrahmanyam, K. 2008d. ‘It’s a Done Deal’. The Times of India, 29 September.Google Scholar

Subrahmanyam, K. and Arunachalam, V. S.. 2009. ‘Deterrence and Explosive Yield’. The Hindu, 20 September.Google Scholar

Subramanian, T. S. 2005a. ‘Waiting, with Caution’. Frontline, 30 July–12 August.Google Scholar

Subramanian, T. S. 2005b. ‘Identifying a Civilian Nuclear Facility is India’s Decision’. The Hindu, 12 August.Google Scholar

Subramanian, T. S. 2007. ‘It is a Practical Solution that Meets All Our Requirements’. The Hindu, 11 August.Google Scholar

Talbott, Strobe. 1998. ‘U.S. Diplomacy in South Asia: A Progress Report’. The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, 12 November.Google Scholar

Talbott, Strobe. 2004. Engaging India: Diplomacy, Democracy, and the Bomb. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Tauscher, Ellen and Markey, Edward. 2008. ‘Don’t Loosen Nuclear Rules for India’. The New York Times, 20 August.Google Scholar

Tellis, Ashley. 2000. India’s Emerging Nuclear Posture: Between Recessed Deterrent and Ready Arsenal. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.Google Scholar

Tellis, Ashley. 2005. India as a New Global Power. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar

Tellis, Ashley. 2006a. ‘The Evolution of US–India Ties: Missile Defense in an Emerging Strategic Relationship’, International Security 30 (4): 113–51.CrossRef Google Scholar

Tellis, Ashley. 2006b. Atoms for War. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar

The Economic Times. 2010a. ‘Pressure Groups on Civil Nuclear Liability Bill Nullified’. 26 August.Google Scholar

The Economic Times. 2010b. ‘US Seeks Changes in Nuclear Liability Bill’. 9 September.Google Scholar

The Economic Times. 2010c. ‘Indian Firms to be Hit Hard by N-Liability Law Provisions’. 5 December.Google Scholar

The Hindu. 2006. ‘Safeguards, End to U.S. Restrictions Must be Interlocking Actions’. Editorial, 27 July.Google Scholar

The Hindu. 2007a. ‘NDA Briefed on Nuclear Agreement’. 27 July.Google Scholar

The Hindu. 2007b. ‘A Sound and Honourable 123’. Editorial, 6 August.Google Scholar

The Hindu. 2007c. ‘Put the Nuclear Deal on Hold’. Editorial, 20 August.Google Scholar

The Hindu. 2007d. ‘Top Nuclear Scientists Take a Dig at Left Front’. 31 August.Google Scholar

The Hindu. 2007e. ‘Basic Concerns of Various Sections had been Met: Srinivasan’. 2 September.Google Scholar

The Hindu. 2007f. ‘Text of the UPA–Left Meeting Report; Government Can go to IAEA’. 17 November.Google Scholar

The Hindu. 2008a. ‘Left Parties to Take All Steps to Stop India–U.S. Nuclear Deal’. 7 March.Google Scholar

The Hindu. 2008b. ‘Bardhan: We Cannot be Party to Government Going Ahead with Deal’. 8 March.Google Scholar

The Hindu. 2008c. ‘Congress–Left Near Break-up on Nuclear Deal’. 19 June.Google Scholar

The Hindu. 2008d. ‘We Will go to IAEA Very Soon: Manmohan’. 8 July.Google Scholar

The Hindu. 2008e. ‘It’s a Privileged Document, Says Congress’. 8 July.Google Scholar

The Indian Express. 2007a. ‘Atomic Atma’. Editorial, 28 August.Google Scholar

The Indian Express. 2007b. ‘Convince me N-Weapons Plan Safe, I’ll Say go Ahead with Deal: Brajesh Mishra’. 25 October.Google Scholar

The Indian Express. 2007c. ‘UPA Talked to Me on N-Deal’. 5 November.Google Scholar

The Indian Express. 2008a. ‘N-Deal: Was India Misled? Left, BJP Say Yes; US Says No’. 3 September.Google Scholar

The Indian Express. 2008b. ‘India Gets NSG Waiver, Manmohan Calls it Historic Deal. 6 September.Google Scholar

The Indian Express. 2010. ‘N-Liability Law: Meeting Suppliers Midway, Govt May Fix Time and Cost’. 27 December.Google Scholar

The New York Times. 2005. ‘Green Light for Bomb Builders’. Editorial, 22 July.Google Scholar

The New York Times. 2006a. ‘President Bush Goes to India’. Editorial, 28 February.Google Scholar

The New York Times. 2006b. ‘The Indian Nuclear Deal’. Editorial, 7 April.Google Scholar

The New York Times. 2007a. ‘A Bad Deal Gets Worse’. Editorial, 5 August.Google Scholar

The New York Times. 2007b. ‘Questions about the India Deal, Finally’. Editorial, 6 October.Google Scholar

The New York Times. 2008a. ‘Let’s Hear it for New Zealand’. Editorial, 31 August.Google Scholar

The New York Times. 2008b. ‘A Bad Deal’. Editorial, 9 September.Google Scholar

The New York Times. 2008c. ‘A Bad India Deal’. Editorial, 30 September.Google Scholar

The New York Times. 2013. ‘Toward a Nuclear Deal with South Korea’. Editorial, 18 April.Google Scholar

The Telegraph. 2006. ‘Taking the N-Train’. Editorial, 19 November.Google Scholar

The Telegraph. 2007a. ‘N-business & Pleasure Mix: Bush Aide on Indian Double Mission’. 28 May.Google Scholar

The Telegraph. 2007b. ‘There at Last’. Editorial, 25 July.Google Scholar

The Telegraph. 2007c. ‘BJP echoes Left on N-text’. 27 July.Google Scholar

The Telegraph. 2007d. ‘Deal of Triumph’. Editorial, 15 August.Google Scholar

The Telegraph. 2007e. ‘A Different Tune’. Editorial, 19 September.Google Scholar

The Telegraph. 2008. ‘Huddle to Amend Text as NSG Meet Drags on’. 6 September.Google Scholar

The Times of India. 2006a. ‘Govt to Protect India’s Interests on Iran Nuke Issue: Sonia’. 21 February.Google Scholar

The Times of India. 2006b. ‘Power Agenda’. Editorial, 24 February.Google Scholar

The Times of India. 2006c. ‘Unclear Policy’. Editorial, 15 March.Google Scholar

The Times of India. 2006d. ‘No-Test Clause in Pact with US: MEA’. 17 April.Google Scholar

The Times of India. 2006e. ‘Passage to America’. Editorial, 29 June.Google Scholar

The Times of India. 2006f. ‘Left Almost Pulled Out Over N-Deal’. 4 November.Google Scholar

The Times of India. 2007a. ‘A Really Big Deal’. Editorial, 21 August.Google Scholar

The Times of India. 2007b. ‘It’s Now or Never’. Editorial, 25 August.Google Scholar

The Times of India. 2007c. ‘Government Blinks’. Editorial, 15 October.Google Scholar

The Times of India. 2008a. ‘PM for Nuclear Deal Even without Left’. 19 June.Google Scholar

The Times of India. 2008b. ‘Make or Break’. Editorial, 20 June.Google Scholar

The Times of India. 2008c. ‘It’s Now or Never’. Editorial, 27 June.Google Scholar

The Times of India. 2008d. ‘India Reserves Right to Go Ahead with N-Tests: Kakodkar’. 8 September.Google Scholar

The Times of India. 2008e. ‘Interview With Nicholas Burns’. 29 February.Google Scholar

The Wall Street Journal Asia. 2008. ‘A Civil Nuclear Power’. Editorial, 21 July.Google Scholar

Varadarajan, Siddharth. 2004. ‘US–India Negotiations Entering Crucial Phase’. The Hindu, 18 October.Google Scholar

Varadarajan, Siddharth. 2005. ‘Nuclear Cooperation with the US: Experts Urge Caution’. The Hindu, 18 July.Google Scholar

Varadarajan, Siddharth. 2006a. ‘Indo-US Nuclear Deal: Safeguards for Breeder Reactors a Key Obstacle’. The Hindu, 21 January.Google Scholar

Varadarajan, Siddharth. 2006b. ‘Question Mark Over Indo-US Nuclear Deal’. The Hindu, 7 February.Google Scholar

Varadarajan, Siddharth. 2007a. ‘Draft 123 Text to be Given to U.S’. The Hindu, 17 February.Google Scholar

Varadarajan, Siddharth. 2007b. ‘Reference to Indian Nuclear Test Unacceptable’. The Hindu, 17 February.Google Scholar

Varadarajan, Siddharth. 2007c. ‘No Place to Hide as Nuclear Deal Enters Last Lap’. The Hindu, 24 March.Google Scholar

Varadarajan, Siddharth. 2007d. ‘Major Obstacles Persist in Nuclear Deal’. The Hindu, 25 April.Google Scholar

Varadarajan, Siddharth. 2007e. ‘India will Stick to Rights-based Approach on Reprocessing’. The Hindu, 3 June.Google Scholar

Varadarajan, Siddharth. 2007f. ‘Manmohan Sent Strong Message through Burns’. The Hindu, 6 June.Google Scholar

Varadarajan, Siddharth. 2007g. ‘Taking Stock of the Indo-U.S. Nuclear Deal’. The Hindu, 17 August.Google Scholar

Varadarajan, Siddharth. 2007h. ‘Deal Breather, Not Deal Breaker’. The Hindu, 20 August.Google Scholar

Varadarajan, Siddharth. 2008a. ‘An Endgame with No Clear Winners’. The Hindu, 22 July.Google Scholar

Varadarajan, Siddharth. 2008b. ‘India Bracing Itself for American NSG Draft Guidelines’. The Hindu, 26 July.Google Scholar

Varadarajan, Siddharth. 2008c. ‘NSG Begins Talks on India Waiver’. The Hindu, 22 August.Google Scholar

Varadarajan, Siddharth. 2008d. ‘Conditions Mooted for Indian Nuclear Waiver’. The Hindu, 23 August.Google Scholar

Varadarajan, Siddharth. 2008e. ‘Looking Beyond the NSG Debacle’. The Hindu, 25 August.Google Scholar

Varadarajan, Siddharth. 2008f. ‘Waiver Enables Member States to Provide India Full Civil Nuclear Cooperation’. The Hindu, 7 September.Google Scholar

Varadarajan, Siddharth. 2008g. ‘India in Dilemma Over 123 Agreement’. The Hindu, 10 September.Google Scholar

Varadarajan, Siddharth. 2008h. ‘End of the Road for the 123 Agreement’. The Hindu, 16 September.Google Scholar

Varadarajan, Siddharth. 2009. ‘Ghost of Tarapur Haunts Reprocessing Agreement with U.S’. The Hindu, 16 December.Google Scholar

Varadarajan, Siddharth. 2010. ‘U.S. Can Suspend Reprocessing if “National Security” is Threatened’. The Hindu, 31 March.Google Scholar

The Washington Post. 2005. ‘A New Nuclear Era’. Editorial, 20 July.Google Scholar

The Washington Post. 2006. ‘Talking Nukes with India’. Editorial, 26 February.Google Scholar

The Washington Post. 2007a. ‘Bet on India’. Editorial, 19 July.Google Scholar

The Washington Post. 2007b. ‘The Model that India Offers’. Editorial, 19 August.Google Scholar

The Washington Post. 2008a. ‘India’s Outstretched Hand’. Editorial, 23 July.Google Scholar

The Washington Post. 2008b. ‘Yes for an Answer’. Editorial, 12 September.Google Scholar

The Washington Times. 2007. ‘Nuking the Nuke Deal’. Editorial, 5 September.Google Scholar

The White House. 1998. ‘Excerpts of President Clinton’s Remarks on the Indian Nuclear Tests’. Washington, DC, 12 May.Google Scholar

The White House. 2002. ‘The National Security Strategy of the United States of America’. September.Google Scholar

The White House. 2005. ‘Joint Statement between President George W. Bush and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’. Washington, DC, 18 July.Google Scholar

The White House. 2006a. ‘Press Briefing by Secretary of State Rice and National Security Advisor Hadley’. Washington, DC, 28 February.Google Scholar

The White House. 2006b. ‘Statement of Administration Policy, HR 5682, United States and India Nuclear Cooperation Promotion Act of 2006’. 26 July.Google Scholar

The White House. 2006c. ‘Statement of Administration Policy, S 3709, United States– India Peaceful Atomic Energy Cooperation and U.S. Additional Protocol Implementation Act’. 16 November.Google Scholar

The White House. 2008. ‘Statement by the President on the Occasion of Signing H.R. 7081’. 8 October.Google Scholar

Vickery, Raymond. 2011. The Eagle and the Elephant: Strategic Aspects of US–India Economic Engagement. Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar

Walt, Stephen. 1987. The Origin of Alliances. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Warburg, Gerald Felix. 2012. ‘Lessons Learned from the US–India Nuclear Cooperation Agreement’. Nonproliferation Review 19 (3): 451–71.CrossRef Google Scholar

Weaver, Kent and Rockman, Bert. 1993. Do Institutions Matter? Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Weiss, Leonard. 2007. ‘U.S.–India Nuclear Cooperation: Better Later than Sooner’. Nonproliferation Review 14 (3): 429–57.CrossRef Google Scholar

Zuberi, Matin. 2005. The Nuclear Deal: India cannot be Coerced. New Delhi: Observer Research Foundation.Google Scholar

Book contents

References

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive