Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T10:15:58.135Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Appendix A - Methods and basis sets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2009

Frank Weinhold
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Clark R. Landis
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Get access

Summary

A quantum-mechanical calculational model can be uniquely specified by identifying (i) the method of approximation and (ii) the orbital basis set that underlies the model. The model is conventionally specified by a keyword label of the form method/basis, where method and basis are suitable identifying abbreviations or acronyms. Simple examples are “RHF/6-31G*” (for the RHF restricted Hartree–Fock method and the 6-31G* basis set) or “B3LYP/6-311 + +G**” (for the B3LYP hybrid density functional method and the 6-311 + +G** basis set). In this appendix we briefly describe the principal method and basis types that are now well established in the literature, particularly as implemented in the Gaussian program. Consult notes 1 and 2 for background information and original references.

Methods

Quantum-mechanical approximation methods can be classified into three generic types: (1) variational, (2) perturbative, and (3) density functional. The first two can be systematically improved toward exactness, but a systematic correction procedure is generally lacking in the third case.

Variational methods

Variational approximation methods are identified by the form of the variational trial function, particularly by the number and types of Slater determinants.

The simplest approximation corresponds to a single-determinant wavefunction. The best possible approximation of this type is the Hartree–Fock (HF) molecular-orbital determinant. The HF wavefunction is constructed from the minimal number of occupied MOs (i.e., N/2 for an N-electron closed-shell system), each approximated as a variational linear combination of the chosen set of basis functions (vide infra).

Type
Chapter
Information
Valency and Bonding
A Natural Bond Orbital Donor-Acceptor Perspective
, pp. 710 - 714
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×