Bibliography

Alan Khee-Jin Tan

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511494628.015

Abecassis, D. W., The Law and Practice Relating to Oil Pollution from Ships (Butterworths, London, Boston, 1978)Google Scholar

Abecassis, D. W. & Jarashow, R., Oil Pollution from Ships (2nd edn, Stevens, London, 1985)Google Scholar

Ademuni-Odeke, , Bareboat Charter (Ship) Registration (Kluwer Law International, Boston, 1998)Google Scholar

Anderson, P., ISM Code: A Practical Guide to the Legal and Insurance Implications (LLP, London, 1998)Google Scholar

Anderson, P.,Cracking the Code: The Relevance of the ISM Code and Its Impact on Shipping Practices (Nautical Institute, London, 2003)Google Scholar

Attard, D., The Exclusive Economic Zone in International Law (Clarendon Press, Oxford; Oxford University Press, New York, 1987)Google Scholar

Birnie, P. & Boyle, A., International Law and the Environment (2nd edn, Oxford University Press, London, 2002)Google Scholar

Boczek, B. A., Flags of Convenience: An International Legal Study (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1962)CrossRef Google Scholar

Boisson, P., Safety at Sea – Policies, Regulations and International Law (D. Mahaffey trans., Edition Bureau Veritas, Paris, 1999)Google Scholar

Brown, E. D., The Legal Regime of Hydrospace (Stevens, London, 1971)Google Scholar

Brown, E. D.,The International Law of the Sea (Dartmouth, Brookfield, VT, 1994)Google Scholar

Brubaker, D., Marine Pollution and International Law: Principles and Practice (Belhaven Press, London, 1993)Google Scholar

Burger, J., Oil Spills (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ, 1997)Google Scholar

Butler, W. E. (ed.), The Law of the Sea and International Shipping: Anglo-Soviet Post-UNCLOS Perspectives (Oceana Publications, New York, 1985)Google Scholar

Carlisle, R. P., Sovereignty for Sale: The Origins and Evolution of the Panamanian and Liberian Flags of Convenience (Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, MD, 1981)Google Scholar

Chao, W., Pollution from the Carriage of Oil by Sea: Liability and Compensation (Kluwer, London, 1996)Google Scholar

Chayes, A. & Chayes, A. H., The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995)Google Scholar

Churchill, R. R. & Lowe, A. V., The Law of the Sea (3rd edn, Manchester University Press, Manchester, 1999)Google Scholar

Churchill, R. R. et al. (eds.), 3 New Directions in the Law of the Sea (Oceana Publications, London, New York, 1973–5)Google Scholar

Cicin-Sain, B. & Knecht, R. W., The Future of U.S. Ocean Policy: Choices for the New Century (Island Press, Washington, D.C., 2000)Google Scholar

Clark, R. B., Marine Pollution (4th edn, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1997)Google Scholar

Coles, R. & Ready, N. P. (eds.), Ship Registration: Law and Practice (LLP, London, 2002)Google Scholar

Crawford, J., The International Law Commission's Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentaries (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002)Google Scholar

Crawford, J. & Rothwell, D. (eds.), The Law of the Sea in the Asian Pacific Region (Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, Boston, 1995)Google Scholar

de la Rue, C. & Anderson, C. B., Shipping and the Environment: Law and Practice (LLP, London, 1998)Google Scholar

de la Rue, C (ed.), Liability for Damage to the Marine Environment (LLP, London, 1993)Google Scholar

Esty, D. & Geradin, D. (eds.), Regulatory Competition and Economic Integration: Comparative Perspectives (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001)Google Scholar

Franckx, E. (ed.), Vessel-Source Pollution and Coastal State Jurisdiction: The Work of the ILA Committee on Coastal State Jurisdiction Relating to Marine Pollution (1991–2000) (Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 2001)Google Scholar

Freestone, D. & Hey, E. (eds.), The Precautionary Principle and International Law: The Challenge of Implementation (Kluwer Law International, Boston, 1996)Google Scholar

Freestone, D. & IJlstra, T. (eds.), The North Sea: Perspectives on Regional Environmental Co-operation (Graham & Trotman, London, Boston, 1990)Google Scholar

Gauci, G., Oil Pollution at Sea: Civil Liability and Compensation for Damage (John Wiley, Chichester, 1997)Google Scholar

Gold, E., Maritime Transport: The Evolution of International Marine Policy and Shipping Law (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA, 1981)Google Scholar

Gold, E.,GARD Handbook on Marine Pollution (2nd edn, Assuranceforeningen Gard, Arendal, Norway, 1997)Google Scholar

Griggs, P. & Williams, R., Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims (3rd edn, LLP, London, 1998)Google Scholar

Griggs, P. et al., Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims (LLP, London, 2004)Google Scholar

Grotius, H., The Freedom of the Seas (1608) (R. Van Deman Magoffin trans., Scott, J. B. (ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1916)Google Scholar

HakapÄÄ, K., Marine Pollution in International Law: Material Obligations and Jurisdiction (Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia, Helsinki, 1981)Google Scholar

Hardin, G., Exploring New Ethics for Survival (Viking Press, New York, 1972)Google Scholar

Johnston, D. M. (ed.), The Environmental Law of the Sea (E. Schmidt, Berlin, 1981)Google Scholar

Kasoulides, G. C., Port State Control and Jurisdiction: Evolution of the Port State Regime (Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, Boston, 1993)Google Scholar

Kindt, J. W., Marine Pollution and the Law of the Sea (W. S. Hein, Buffalo, NY, 1986)Google Scholar

Kiss, A. C. & Shelton, D., International Environmental Law (2nd edn, Transnational Publishers, Ardsley, NY, 2000)Google Scholar

Koers, A. W. & Oxman, B. H. (eds.), The 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea (Law of the Sea Institute, University of Hawaii, 1984)Google Scholar

Kriwoken, L. et al. (eds.), Oceans Law and Policy in the post-UNCED Era: Australian and Canadian Perspectives (Kluwer Law International, London, 1996)Google Scholar

Kwiatkowska, B., The 200-Mile Exclusive Economic Zone in the New Law of the Sea (Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, Boston, 1989)Google Scholar

Mahmoudi, S., The Law of Deep Sea Bed Mining (Almqvist & Wiksell International, Stockholm, 1987)Google Scholar

Mankabady, S., The International Maritime Organization (Croom Helm, London, Wolfeboro, NH, 1986)Google Scholar

McDorman, T. et al., The Marine Environment and the Caracas Convention on the Law of the Sea (Dalhousie Ocean Studies Programme, Canada, 1981)Google Scholar

McDougal, M. S. & Burke, W. T., The Public Order of the Oceans: A Contemporary International Law of the Sea (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1962)Google Scholar

Meng, Q.-N., Land-Based Marine Pollution (Graham & Trotman, London, Boston, 1987)Google Scholar

Metaxas, B. N., Flag of Convenience: A Study of Internationalisation (Gower, Aldershot, Brookfield, VT, 1985)Google Scholar

Meyers, H., The Nationality of Ships (Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1967)CrossRef Google Scholar

M'Gonigle, R. M. & Zacher, M. W., Pollution, Politics and International Law: Tankers at Sea (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1979)Google Scholar

Miles, E. L., Global Ocean Politics: The Decision Process at the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea 1973–1982, (Martinus Nijhoff, Boston, 1998)Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. B., Intentional Oil Pollution at Sea – Environmental Policy and Treaty Compliance (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994)Google Scholar

Molenaar, E. J., Coastal State Jurisdiction over Vessel-Source Pollution (Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 1998)Google Scholar

Naess, E. D., The Great PanLibHon Controversy – The Fight over the Flags of Shipping (Gower Press, Epping, 1972)Google Scholar

Nandan, S., Rosenne, S. & Nordquist, M. H. (eds.), 2 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982: A Commentary (Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, Boston, 1993)Google Scholar

Nandan, S., Rosenne, S. & Nordquist, M. H.(eds.), 3 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982: A Commentary (Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, Boston, 1995)Google Scholar

Northrup, H. R. & Rowan, R. L., The International Transport Workers' Federation and Flag of Convenience Shipping (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 1983)Google Scholar

O'Connell, D. P., The Influence of Law on Sea Power (Manchester University Press, Manchester, 1975)Google Scholar

O'Connell, D. P.,The International Law of the Sea (2 vols., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1982, 1984)Google Scholar

ÖzÇayir, Z. O., Port State Control (LLP, London, 2004)Google Scholar

Payoyo, P. B., Port State Control in the Asia-Pacific: An International Legal Study of Port State Jurisdiction (University of the Philippines Law Center, Manila, 1993)Google Scholar

Peet, G., Operational Discharges from Ships: An Evaluation of the Application of the Discharge Provisions of the MARPOL Convention by Its Contracting Parties (AIDEnvironment, Amsterdam, 1992)Google Scholar

Pritchard, S. Z., Oil Pollution Control (Croom Helm, London, Wolfeboro, NH, 1987)Google Scholar

Reisman, W. M. & Weston, B. H. (eds.), Towards World Order and Human Dignity: Essays in Honor of Myres S. McDougal (Free Press, New York, 1976)Google Scholar

Rienow, R., The Test of Nationality of a Merchant Vessel (New York, 1937)Google Scholar

Roach, J. A. & Smith, R. W., Excessive Maritime Claims (2nd edn, Martinus Nijhoff, Boston, 1996)Google Scholar

Ross, W. M., Oil Pollution as an International Problem (University of Washington Press, Seattle, 1973)Google Scholar

Sadler, P. & King, J., Study on Mechanisms for the Financing of Facilities in Ports for the Reception of Wastes from Ships, attached to MEPC Doc. 30/INF.32 (International Maritime Organization, London, 1990).Google Scholar

Sand, P. H., Transnational Environmental Law: Lessons in Global Change (Kluwer Law International, London, 1999)Google Scholar

Shaw, M. N., International Law (3rd edn, Grotius Publications, Cambridge, 1991)Google Scholar

Shaw, M. N.,International Law (5th edn, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003)CrossRef Google Scholar

Shinn, R. A., The International Politics of Marine Pollution Control (Praeger, New York, 1974)Google Scholar

Sibenius, J. K., Negotiating the Law of the Sea (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1984)Google Scholar

Silverstein, H., Superships and Nation States: The Transnational Problem of Oil Pollution (Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1978)Google Scholar

Simmonds, K. R., The International Maritime Organization (Simmonds & Hill, London, 1994)Google Scholar

Singh, N., Maritime Flag and International Law (Thomason Press, Haryana, 1978)Google Scholar

Smith, B. D., State Responsibility and the Marine Environment: The Rules of Decision (Oxford University Press, 1988)Google Scholar

Stoop, M., Olieverontreiniging door schepen op der Noordzee over de periode 1982–1987: Opsporing en vervolging (Werkgroep Nordzee, Amsterdam, 1989)Google Scholar

Timagenis, G., International Control of Marine Pollution (Oceana Publications, NY, 1980)Google Scholar

Tolofari, S. R., Open Registry Shipping: A Comparative Study of Costs and Freight Rates (Gordon & Breach Science Publishers, New York, NY, 1989)Google Scholar

Valois, P., Tankers – An Introduction to the Transport of Oil by Sea (Witherby & Co., London, 1997)Google Scholar

Vogel, D., Trading Up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995)Google Scholar

Waters, W. G. II et al., Oil Pollution from Tanker Operations – Causes, Costs, Controls (University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 1980)Google Scholar

Weiss, E. B. & Jacobson, H. (eds.), Engaging Countries: Strengthening Compliance with International Accords (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998)Google Scholar

Willingale, M., Ship Management (3rd edn, LLP, London, 1998)Google Scholar

Young, O., Compliance and Public Authority: A Theory with International Application (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 1979)Google Scholar

Young, O.(ed.), The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Causal Connections and Behavioral Mechanisms (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999)Google Scholar

Abecassis, D. W., Marine Oil Pollution Laws: The View of Shell International Marine Limited, 8 Int'l Bus. L.3 (1980).Google Scholar

Ademuni-Odeke, , Port State Control and U.K. Law, 28 J. Mar. L. & Com.657 (1997)Google Scholar

Alcantara, L. F. & Cox, M. A., OPA 90 Certificates of Financial Responsibility, 23 J. Mar. L. & Com.369 (1992)Google Scholar

Alcock, T. M., ‘Ecology’ Tankers and the Oil Pollution Act of 1990: A History of Efforts to Require Double Hulls on Oil Tankers, 19 Ecology L. Q.97 (1992)Google Scholar

Allen, C. H., Federalism in the Era of International Standards: Federal and State Government Regulation of Merchant Vessels in the United States (Part III), 30 J. Mar. L. & Com.85 (1999)Google Scholar

Anderson, C. B. & Rue, C., Liability of Charterers and Cargo Owners for Pollution from Ships, 26 Mar. Law. 42 (2001)Google Scholar

Anderson, D. W., National and International Efforts to Prevent Traumatic Vessel Source Oil Pollution, 30 U. Miami L. Rev.985 (1976)Google Scholar

Anderson, H. E. III, The Nationality of Ships and Flags of Convenience: Economics, Politics and Alternatives, 21 Tul. Mar. L. J.139 (1996)Google Scholar

Ayorinde, A. A., Inconsistencies Between OPA 90 and MARPOL 73/78: What is the Effect on Legal Rights and Obligations of the United States and Other Parties to MARPOL 73/78?, 25 J. Mar. L. & Com.55 (1994)Google Scholar

Baldwin, M. et al., Recent Developments: A Review of Developments in Ocean and Coastal Law 1999–2000, 5 Ocean & Coastal L. J.367 (2000)Google Scholar

Becker, G. L., A Short Cruise on the Good Ships TOVALOP and CRISTAL, 5 J. Mar. L. & Com.609 (1974)Google Scholar

Bederman, D. J., Dead in the Water: International Law, Diplomacy and Compensation for Chemical Pollution at Sea, 26 Va. J. Int'l. L.485 (1986)Google Scholar

Bederman, D. J.,International Control of Marine ‘Pollution’ by Exotic Species, 18 Ecology L. Q.677 (1991)Google Scholar

Bernhardt, J. P. A., A Schematic Analysis of Vessel-Source Pollution: Prescriptive and Enforcement Regimes in the Law of the Sea Conference, 20 Va. J. Int'l L.265 (1980)Google Scholar

Bilder, R., The Canadian Arctic Waters Pollution Prevention Act: New Stresses on the Law of the Sea, 69 Mich. L. Rev.1 (1970)CrossRef Google Scholar

Birnie, P., Reflagging of Fishing Vessels on the High Seas, 2 RECIEL270 (1993)Google Scholar

Bodansky, D. M., Protecting the Marine Environment from Vessel-Source Pollution: UNCLOS III and Beyond, 18 Ecology L. Q.719 (1991)Google Scholar

Boehmer-Christiansen, S., Marine Pollution Control: UNCLOS III as the Partial Codification of International Practice, 7 Envtl. Pol'y & L.71 (1981)CrossRef Google Scholar

Boos, M., The Oil Pollution Act of 1990: Striking the Flags of Convenience?, 2 Colo. J. Int'l Envtl. L. & Pol'y407 (1991)Google Scholar

Boyle, A. E., Marine Pollution under the Law of the Sea Convention, 79 Am. J. Int'l L.347 (1987)CrossRef Google Scholar

Boyle, A. E.,Land-Based Sources of Marine Pollution: Current Legal Regime, 16 Marine Pol'y20 (1992)CrossRef Google Scholar

Boyle, A. E.,Dispute Settlement and the Law of the Sea Convention: Problems of Fragmentation and Jurisdiction, 46 Int'l & Comp. L. Q.37 (1997)CrossRef Google Scholar

Bradshaw, R. E., The Politics of Soviet Maritime Security, 10 J. Mar. L. & Com.411 (1979)Google Scholar

Bryant, D. L., Port State Control as Practiced by the U.S. Coast Guard, 10 Int'l Mar. L.303 (1997)Google Scholar

Buzan, B., Negotiating by Consensus: Developments in Technique at the United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, 75 Am. J. Int'l L.324 (1981)CrossRef Google Scholar

Cane, P. F., The Liability of Classification Societies, 3 Lloyd's Mar. & Com. L. Q.363 (1994)Google Scholar

Chao, W., Liability and Compensation for Bunker Pollution, 33 J. Mar. L. & Com.553 (2002)Google Scholar

Charney, J. I., The Marine Environment and the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 28 Int'l Law. 879 (1994)Google Scholar

Charney, J. I.,U.S. Provisional Application of the 1994 Deep Seabed Agreement, 88 Am. J. Int'l L.705 (1994)CrossRef Google Scholar

Charney, J. I.,The Protection of the Marine Environment by the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 7 Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev.731 (1995)Google Scholar

Charney, J. I.,Entry into Force of the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea, 35 Va. J. Int'l L.381 (1995)Google Scholar

Chayes, A. & Chayes, A. H., Compliance Without Enforcement: State Behavior under Regulatory Treaties, 7 Negotiation J.311 (1991)CrossRef Google Scholar

Churchill, R. R., The Meaning of the ‘Genuine Link’ Requirement in Relation to the Nationality of Ships, A Report for the International Transport Workers' Federation (2000), available athttp://www.oceanlaw.net/hedley/pubs/ITF-Oct2000.pdf

Clarke, A., Port State Control or Sub-Standard Ships: Who is to Blame? What is the Cure?, Lloyd's Mar. & Comm. L. Q.202 (1994)Google Scholar

Cohen, L. G., Revisions of TOVALOP and CRISTAL: Strong Ships for Stormy Seas, 18 J. Mar. L. & Com.525 (1987)Google Scholar

Cooney, M. K., The Stormy Seas of Oil Pollution Liability: Will Protection and Indemnity Clubs Survive?, 16 Hous. J. Int'l L343 (1993)Google Scholar

Curtis, J. B., Vessel-Source Oil Pollution and MARPOL 73/78: An International Success Story?, 15 Envtl. L.679 (1985)Google Scholar

Cuttler, M., Incentives for Reducing Oil Pollution from Ships: The Case for Enhanced Port State Control, Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev.175 (1995)Google Scholar

DeBievre, A. F. M., Liability and Compensation for Damage in Connection with the Carriage of Hazardous and Noxious Substances by Sea, 17 J. Mar. L. & Com.61 (1986)Google Scholar

Degan, V. D., Internal Waters, 17 Neth. Y.B. Int'l L.3 (1986)CrossRef Google Scholar

Gennaro, M., Oil Pollution Liability and Control under International Maritime Law: Market Incentives as an Alternative to Government Regulation, 37 Vand. J. Transnat'l L.265 (2004)Google Scholar

Fayette, L., Access to Ports in International Law, 11 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L. 1, at 22 (1996)Google Scholar

Rue, C., TOVALOP and CRISTAL – A Purpose Fulfilled, Int'l J. Shipping L.285 (1996)Google Scholar

Dehner, J. S., Vessel-Source Pollution and Public Vessels: Sovereign Immunity v. Compliance – Implications for International Environmental Law, 9 Emory Int'l L. Rev.508 (1995)Google Scholar

Dempsey, P. S., Compliance and Enforcement in International Law – Oil Pollution of the Marine Environment by Ocean Vessels, 6 Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus.459 (1984)Google Scholar

Dempsey, P. S. & Helling, L., Oil Pollution by Ocean Vessels – Environmental Tragedy: The Legal Regime of Flags of Convenience, Multilateral Conventions and Coastal States, 10 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y37 (1980).Google Scholar

DeSombre, E., Flags of Convenience and the Implementation of International Environmental, Safety, and Labor Standards at Sea, 37 Int'l Pol.213 (2000)CrossRef Google Scholar

Dinstein, Y., Oil Pollution by Ships and Freedom of the High Seas, 3 J. Mar. L. & Com.363 (1972)Google Scholar

Duruigbo, E., Multinational Corporations and Compliance with International Regulations Relating to the Petroleum Industry, 7 Ann. Surv. Int'l & Comp. L.101 (2001).Google Scholar

Dzidzornu, D. M., Coastal State Obligations and Powers Respecting EEZ Environmental Protection under Part XII of the UNCLOS: A Descriptive Analysis, 8 Colo. J. Int'l Envtl. L. & Pol'y283 (1997)Google Scholar

Dzidzornu, D. M. & Tsamenyi, B. M., Enhancing International Control of Vessel-Source Oil Pollution under the Law of the Sea Convention, 1982: A Reassessment, 10 U. Tasm. L. Rev.270 (1991)Google Scholar

Ehlers, P., The Helsinki Convention: Improving the Baltic Sea Environment, 8 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L.191 (1993)CrossRef Google Scholar

Ellis, E. J., International Law and Oily Waters: A Critical Analysis, 6 Colo. J. Int'l Envtl. L. & Pol'y32 (1995)Google Scholar

Eskenazi, N. J., Forum Non Conveniens and Choice of Law In Re: The Amoco Cadiz Oil Spill, 24 J. Mar. L. & Com.371 (1993)Google Scholar

Franckx, E., Coastal State Jurisdiction with Respect to Marine Pollution – Some Recent Developments and Future Challenges, 10 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L.253 (1995)CrossRef Google Scholar

Garick, J. A., Crisis in the Oil Industry – Certificates of Financial Responsibility and the OPA 1990, 17 Marine Pol'y272 (1993)CrossRef Google Scholar

Gaskell, N., Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage: 1992 Protocols to the Civil Liability Convention and the Fund Convention, 8 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L.286 (1993)CrossRef Google Scholar

Giffin, J., Developments Concerning Criminal Charges Against Vessel Owners and Corporate Officers for Oil Spills in U.S. Waters, 5 Int'l Mar. L.91 (1999)Google Scholar

Gjerde, K. & Freestone, D. (eds.), Particularly Sensitive Sea Areas – An Important Environmental Concept at a Turning Point, 9 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L.431 (1994)CrossRef Google Scholar

Gold, E., Learning from Disaster: Lessons in Regulatory Enforcement in the Maritime Sector, 8 RECIEL16 (1999)Google Scholar

Goldie, L. F. E., Recognition and Dual Nationality – A Problem of Flags of Convenience, 39 Brit. Y.B. Int'l L.220 (1963)Google Scholar

Goldie, L. F. E.,Environmental Catastrophes and Flags of Convenience – Does the Present Law Pose Special Liability Issues?, 3 Pace Y. B. Int'l L.63 (1991)Google Scholar

Gordan, J. D. III, The Liability of Marine Surveyors and Ship Classification Societies, 19 J. Mar. L. & Com.301 (1988)Google Scholar

Griffin, A., MARPOL 73/78 and Vessel Pollution: A Glass Half Full or Half Empty?, 1 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud.489 (1994)Google Scholar

Handl, G., International Liability of States for Marine Pollution, 21 Can. Y.B. Int'l L.85 (1983)Google Scholar

Handl, G.,Controlling Implementation of and Compliance with International Environmental Agreements: The Rocky Road from Rio, 5 Colo. J. Int'l Envtl L. & Pol'y 305, at 330 (1994)Google Scholar

Hardin, G., The Tragedy of the Commons, 162 Sci.1243 (1968)Google Scholar PubMed

Hare, J., Port State Control: Strong Medicine to Cure a Sick Industry, 26 Ga. J. Int'l & Comp. L.571 (1997)Google Scholar

Harling, R., The Liability of Classification Societies to Cargo Owners, 1 Mar. & Com. L. Q.1 (1993)Google Scholar

Healy, N. J., The CMI and IMCO Draft Conventions on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution, 1 J. Mar. L. & Com.93 (1970)Google Scholar

Henkin, L., Arctic Antipollution: Does Canada Make or Break International Law?, Am. J. Int'l L.131 (1971)CrossRef Google Scholar

Hey, E., IJlstra, T. & Nollkaemper, A., The 1992 Paris Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic: A Critical Analysis, 8 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L.1 (1993)CrossRef Google Scholar

Honka, H., The Classification System and its Problems with Special Reference to the Liability of Classification Societies, Tul. Mar. L. J.1 (1994)Google Scholar

Jacobsen, D. A. & Yellen, J. D., Oil Pollution: The 1984 Protocols and Amoco Cadiz, 15 J. Mar. L. & Com.467 (1984)Google Scholar

Jacobsson, M. & Trotz, N., The Definition of Pollution Damage in the 1984 Protocols to the 1969 Civil Liability Convention and the 1971 Fund Convention, 17 J. Mar. L. & Com.467 (1986)Google Scholar

Johnson, D. H. N., The Nationality of Ships, 8 Indian Y.B. Int'l Aff.3 (1959)Google Scholar

Joyner, C. C., Biodiversity in the Marine Environment: Resource Implications for the Law of the Sea, 28 Vand. J. Transnat'l L.635 (1995)Google Scholar

Juda, L., IMCO and the Regulation of Ocean Pollution from Ships, 26 Int'l & Comp. L. Q.558 (1977)CrossRef Google Scholar

Kasoulides, G. C., The 1986 United Nations Convention for the Conditions for the Registration of Vessels and the Question of Open Registry, 20 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.543 (1989)CrossRef Google Scholar

Keselj, T., Port State Jurisdiction in Respect of Pollution from Ships: The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and the Memorandum of Understanding, 30 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L. J.127 (1999)CrossRef Google Scholar

Kiehne, G., Investigation, Detention and Release of Ships under the Paris MOU on Port State Control: A View from Practice, 11 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L.217 (1996)CrossRef Google Scholar

Kimball, L., The Law of the Sea Convention and Marine Environmental Protection, 7 Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev.745 (1995)Google Scholar

Kindt, J. W., The Effect of Claims by Developing Countries on LOS International Marine Pollution Negotiations, 20 Va. J. Int'l L.313 (1980)Google Scholar

Koroleva, N. D. & Kiesev, V. A., Soviet Marine Pollution Legislation: Prevention of Pollution from Ships and the LOS Convention, 15 Marine Pol'y49 (1991)CrossRef Google Scholar

Kwiatkowska, B., Marine Pollution from Land-Based Sources: Current Problems and Prospects, 14 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.315 (1984)CrossRef Google Scholar

Kwiatkowska, B.,Creeping Jurisdiction Beyond 200 Miles in the Light of the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention, 22 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.153 (1991)CrossRef Google Scholar

Lapidoth, R., Freedom of Navigation – Its Legal History and Its Normative Basis, 6 J. Mar. L & Com.259 (1975)Google Scholar

Lee, L. T., The Law of the Sea Convention and Third Parties, 77 Am. J. Int'l L.541 (1983)CrossRef Google Scholar

Legatski, R., Port State Jurisdiction over Vessel-Source Pollution, 2 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev.448 (1977)Google Scholar

Legault, L., The Freedom of the Oceans: A License to Pollute?, 21 U. Toronto L. J.39 (1971)CrossRef Google Scholar

Li, K. X. & Wonham, J., New Developments in Ship Registration, 14 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L.137 (1999)CrossRef Google Scholar

Lotilla, R. P., The Efficacy of the Anti-Pollution Legislation Provisions in the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea, 41 Int'l. & Comp. L. Q.137 (1992)CrossRef Google Scholar

Lowe, A. V., The Enforcement of Marine Pollution Regulations, 12 San Diego L. Rev.624 (1975)Google Scholar

Marion, M. A., OPA 1990 Revisited, Int'l J. Shipping L.188 (1997)Google Scholar

Marston, G., The U.N. Convention on Registration of Ships, 20 J. World Trade L.575 (1986)Google Scholar

Matlin, D. F., Re-evaluating the Status of Flags of Convenience Under International Law, 23 Vand. J. Transnat'l L.1017 (1991).Google Scholar

McConnell, M. L., ‘… Darkening Confusion Mounted Upon Darkening Confusion’: The Search for the Elusive Genuine Link, 16 J. Mar. L. & Com.365 (1985)Google Scholar

McConnell, M. L.,‘Business as Usual’: An Evaluation of the 1986 UNCCRS, 18 J. Mar. L. & Com.435 (1986)Google Scholar

McDorman, T., Port State Enforcement: A Comment on Article 218 of the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention, 28 J. Mar. L. & Com.305 (1997)Google Scholar

McDorman, T.,Regional Port State Control Agreements: Some Issues of International Law, Ocean & Coastal L. J.207 (2000)Google Scholar

McDougal, M. S., Burke, W. T. & Vlasic, I. A., The Maintenance of Public Order at Sea and the Nationality of Ships, 54 Am. J. Int'l L.25 (1960)CrossRef Google Scholar

McRae, D. & Goundrey, D., Environmental Jurisdiction in Arctic Waters: The Extent of Article 234, 16 U. Br. Col. L. Rev. 197 (1982)Google Scholar

Meese, S. A., When Jurisdictional Interests Collide: International, Domestic and State Efforts to Prevent Vessel-Source Oil Pollution, 12 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.71 (1982)CrossRef Google Scholar

Mendelsohn, A. I., Ocean Pollution and the 1972 United Nations Conference on the Environment, 3 J. Mar. L. & Com.385 (1972)Google Scholar

Mensah, T. A., International Environmental Law: International Conventions Concerning Oil Pollution at Sea, 8 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L.110 (1976)Google Scholar

Mitchell, G., Preservation of State and Federal Authority Under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, 21 Envtl. L.237 (1991)Google Scholar

Molenaar, E. J., EC Directive on Port State Control in Context, 11 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L.241 (1996)CrossRef Google Scholar

Mooradian, C., Protecting ‘Sovereign Rights’: The Case for Increased Coastal State Jurisdiction Over Vessel-Source Pollution in the Exclusive Economic Zone, 82 B.U. L. Rev.767 (2002)Google Scholar

Moore, J. N., The Regime of Straits and the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, 74 Am. J. Int'l L.77 (1980)CrossRef Google Scholar

Morgan, J., The Oil Pollution Act of 1990: A Look at its Impact on the Oil Industry, 6 Fordham Envtl. L. J.1 (1994)Google Scholar

Nagelmackers, H.-G., Aftermath of the Amoco Cadiz – Why Must the European Community Act?, 4 Marine Pol'y3 (1980)CrossRef Google Scholar

Nanda, V. P., The Torrey Canyon Disaster: Some Legal Aspects, 44 Denv. L. J.400 (1967)Google Scholar

Nandan, S. N. & Anderson, D. H., Straits Used for International Navigation: A Commentary on Part III of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982, 60 Brit. Y.B. Int'l L.159 (1989)CrossRef Google Scholar

Nelson, L. D. M., The New Deep Seabed Mining Regime, 10 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L.189 (1995)CrossRef Google Scholar

Ng, J. M., International Maritime Conventions: Seafarers' Safety and Human Rights, 33 J. Mar. L. & Com.381 (2002)Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, A. & Hey, E., Implementation of the LOS Convention at Regional Level: European Community Competence in Regulating Safety and Environmental Aspects of Shipping, 10 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L.281 (1995)CrossRef Google Scholar

Northrup, H. R. & Scrase, P. B., The International Transport Workers' Federation Flag of Convenience Shipping Campaign: 1983–95, 23 U. Denv. Transp. L. J.369 (1996)Google Scholar

Oda, S., The Concept of the Contiguous Zone, 11 Int'l & Comp. L. Q.131 (1962)CrossRef Google Scholar

Oda, S.,Dispute Settlement Prospects in the Law of the Sea, 44 Int'l & Comp. L. Q.863 (1995)CrossRef Google Scholar

Okamura, B., Proposed IMO Regulations for the Prevention of Air Pollution from Ships, 26 J. Mar. L. & Com.183 (1995)Google Scholar

Osieke, E., Flags of Convenience Vessels: Recent Developments, 73 Am. J. Int'l L.604 (1979)CrossRef Google Scholar

Osieke, E.,The International Labour Organization and the Control of Sub-standard Merchant Vessels, 30 Int'l & Comp. L. Q.497 (1981)CrossRef Google Scholar

Oxman, B. H., The New Law of the Sea, 69 A.B.A. J.157 (1983)Google Scholar

Oxman, B. H.,The Regime of Warships Under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 24 Va. J. Int'l L.809 (1984)Google Scholar

Oxman, B. H.,The Duty to Respect Generally Accepted International Standards, 24 N.Y.U. J. Int'l L. & Pol.109 (1991)Google Scholar

Oxman, B. H.,Environmental Protection in Archipelagic Waters and International Straits – The Role of the International Maritime Organization, 10 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L.467 (1995)CrossRef Google Scholar

Oxman, B. H.,United States Interests in the Law of the Sea, 88 Am. J. Int'l L.167 (1994)Google Scholar

Oxman, B. H. & Bantz, V., Case Note on the Saiga Case, 94 Am. J. Int'l L.140 (2000)CrossRef Google Scholar

Pamborides, G. P., The ISM Code: Potential Legal Implications, Int'l Mar. L.52 (1996)Google Scholar

Payne, R., Flags of Convenience and Oil Pollution: A Threat to National Security, 3 Hous. J. Int'l L.67 (1980)Google Scholar

Payoyo, P. B., Implementation of International Conventions Through Port State Control: An Assessment, 18 Marine Pol'y379 (1994)CrossRef Google Scholar

Peet, G., Particularly Sensitive Sea Areas – A Documentary History, 9 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L.469 (1994)CrossRef Google Scholar

Plant, G., International Legal Aspects of Vessel Traffic Services, 14 Marine Pol'y71 (1990)CrossRef Google Scholar

Plant, G.,A European Lawyer's View of the Government Response to the Donaldson Report, 19 Marine Pol'y453 (1995)CrossRef Google Scholar

Pritchard, S. Z., Load on Top – From the Sublime to the Absurd, 9 J. Mar. L. & Com.185 (1978)Google Scholar

Rauscher, S., Raising the Stakes for Environmental Polluters: The Exxon Valdez Criminal Prosecution, 19 Ecology L. Q.147 (1992)Google Scholar

Redgwell, C., Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage – Quantifying Environmental Harm, 16 Marine Pol'y90 (1992)CrossRef Google Scholar

Reisman, W. M., The Regime of Straits and National Security: An Appraisal of International Lawmaking, 74 Am. J. Int'l L.48 (1980)CrossRef Google Scholar

Ringbom, H., Preventing Pollution from Ships – Reflections on the ‘Adequacy’ of Existing Rules, 1 RECIEL21 (1999)Google Scholar

Rosencranz, A., The ECE Convention of 1979 on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution, 75 Am. J. Int'l L.975 (1981)CrossRef Google Scholar

Salvarani, R., The EC Directive on Port State Control: A Policy Statement, 11 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L.225 (1996)CrossRef Google Scholar

Schachter, O. & Serwer, D., Marine Pollution Problems and Remedies, 65 Am. J. Int'l L. 84 (1971)CrossRef Google Scholar

Schneider, J., Something Old, Something New: Some Thoughts on Grotius and the Marine Environment, 18 Va. J. Int'l L.147 (1977)Google Scholar

Shaw, B., Winslett, B. & Cross, F., The Global Environment: A Proposal to Eliminate Marine Oil Pollution, 27 Nat. Resources J.157 (1987)Google Scholar

Shearer, I., Problems of Jurisdiction and Law Enforcement Against Delinquent Vessels, 35 Int'l & Comp. L. Q.320 (1986)CrossRef Google Scholar

Simmonds, K. R., The Constitution of the Maritime Safety Committee of IMCO, 12 Int'l & Comp. L. Q.56 (1963)CrossRef Google Scholar

Sinan, I. M., UNCTAD and Flags of Convenience, 18 J. World Trade L.95 (1984)Google Scholar

Sletmo, G. K. & Holste, S., Shipping as the Competitive Advantage of Nations: The Role of International Ship Registers, 20 Mar. Pol'y Mgmt.243 (1993)CrossRef Google Scholar

Smith, B., Innocent Passage as a Rule of Decision: Navigation v. Environmental Protection, 21 Colum. J. Transnat'l L.49 (1983)Google Scholar

Smith, J. T., Natural Resource Damages Under CERCLA and OPA: Some Basics for Maritime Operators, 18 Tul. Mar. L. J.1 (1993)Google Scholar

Smith, S. T., An Analysis of the Pollution Act of 1990 and the 1984 Protocols on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage, 14 Hous. J. Int'l L.115 (1991)Google Scholar

Sohn, L. B., The Stockholm Declaration on the Human Environment, 14 Harv. Int'l L. J.423 (1973)Google Scholar

Sohn, L. B.,‘Generally Accepted’ International Rules, 61 Wash. L. Rev.1073 (1986)Google Scholar

Soisson, N., International Oil Spill Compensation Systems, 9 Int'l Mar. L.273 (1997)Google Scholar

Sperling, G., The New Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping: What, if Anything, Does it Mean? 22 Tul. Mar. L. J.595 (1998)Google Scholar

Srivastava, C. P., The Role of the International Maritime Organization, 14 Marine Pol'y243 (1990)CrossRef Google Scholar

Stevenson, J. R. & Oxman, B. H., The Future of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 88 Am. J. Int'l L.488 (1994)CrossRef Google Scholar

Sturmey, S. G., The United Nations Convention on Conditions for Registration of Ships, Lloyd's Mar. & Comm. L. Q.97 (1987)Google Scholar

Sweeney, J. C., Oil Pollution of the Oceans, 37 Fordham L. Rev.115 (1968)Google Scholar

Tache, S. W., The Nationality of Ships: The Definitional Controversy and Enforcement of Genuine Link, 16 Int'l Lawyer301 (1982)Google Scholar

Tetley, W., The Law of the Flag, ‘Flag Shopping’ and the Choice of Law, 17 Tul. Mar. L. J.175 (1992)Google Scholar

Tharpes, Y. L., International Environmental Law: Turning the Tide on Marine Pollution, 20 U. Miami Inter-Am. L. Rev.579 (1989)Google Scholar

Tilley, M., The Origin and Development of the Mutual Shipowners' Protection and Indemnity Associations, 17 J. Mar. L. & Com.261 (1986)Google Scholar

Tomczak, M., Defining Marine Pollution: A Comparison of Definitions Used by International Conventions, 8 Marine Pol'y311 (1984)CrossRef Google Scholar

Dyke, J. M., Sea Shipment of Japanese Plutonium and International Law, 24 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.399, (1993)CrossRef Google Scholar

Reenen, W., Rules of Reference in the New Convention on the Law of the Sea, in Particular in Connection with the Pollution of the Sea by Oil Tankers, 12 Neth. Y.B. Int'l L.3 (1981)CrossRef Google Scholar

Wagner, T. J., The Oil Pollution Act of 1990: An Analysis, 21 J. Mar. L. & Com.569 (1990)Google Scholar

Walker, G. K. & Noyes, J. E., Definitions for the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention, 32 Cal. W. Int'l L. J.343 (2002)Google Scholar

Wallace, M. W., Safer Ships, Cleaner Seas: The Report of the Donaldson Inquiry into the Prevention of Pollution from Merchant Shipping, Lloyd's Mar. & Comm. L. Q.404 (1995)Google Scholar

Wang, C.-P., A Review of the Enforcement Regime for Vessel-Source Oil Pollution Control, 16 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.305 (1986)CrossRef Google Scholar

Warner-Kramer, D., Control Begins at Home: Tackling Flags of Convenience and IUU Fishing, 34 Golden Gate U. L. Rev.497 (2004)Google Scholar

Wefers Bettink, H., Open Registry, the Genuine Link and the 1986 Convention on Registration Conditions for Ships, 18 Neth. Y.B. Int'l L.68 (1987)Google Scholar

Wolfrum, R., Reflagging and Escort Operation in the Persian Gulf: An International Law Perspective, 29 Va. J. Int'l L.387 (1989)Google Scholar

Yankov, A., The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Its Place Within the Dispute Settlement System of the U.N. Law of the Sea Convention, 37 Indian J. Int'l L.356 (1997)Google Scholar

Yuzon, F. J., Full Speed Ahead: International Law Concerning Marine Pollution and the United States Navy – Steaming Towards State Responsibility and Compliance, Pace Int'l L. Rev.57 (1997)Google Scholar

Angelo, J., The International Maritime Organization and Protection of the Marine Environment, inNordquist, M. H. & Moore, J. N. (eds.), Current Maritime Issues and the International Maritime Organization 105 (Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1999)Google Scholar

Angelo, J.,Erika Aftermath: Developments at IMO on Double Hulls (A U.S. Perspective), inNordquist, M. H. & Moore, J. N., Current Marine Environmental Issues and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea 309 (Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 2001)Google Scholar

Birnie, P. W., Enforcement of the International Laws for the Prevention of Oil Pollution from Vessels, inCusine, D. J. & Grant, J. P. (eds.), The Impact of Marine Pollution 95 (Croom Helm, London, 1980)Google Scholar

Birnie, P. W.,The Status of Environmental ‘Soft Law’: Trends and Examples with Special Focus on IMO Norms, inRingbom, H. (ed.), Competing Norms in the Law of Marine Environmental Protection – Focus on Ship Safety and Pollution Prevention 31 (Kluwer Law International, London, 1997)Google Scholar

Boyle, A. E., Freestone, D., Krummer, K. & Ong, D., Marine Environment and Marine Pollution, in Robinson, N. (ed.), Agenda 21 and the UNCED Proceedings 1207 (Oceana Publications, New York 1992)Google Scholar

Churchill, R. R., Levels of Implementation of the Law of the Sea Convention: An Overview, inVidas, D. & Østreng, W. (eds.), Order for the Oceans at the Turn of the Century 318 (Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 1999)Google Scholar

Clingan, T. A., Vessel-Source Pollution, Problems of Hazardous Cargo, and Port State Jurisdiction, inVan Dyke, J., Alexander, L. & Morgan, J. (eds.), International Navigation: Rocks and Shoals Ahead? 227 (Law of the Sea Institute, University of Hawaii, 1988)Google Scholar

Falk, R. & Elver, H., Comparing Global Perspectives: The 1982 UNCLOS and the 1992 UNCED, inVidas, D. & Østreng, W. (eds.), Order for the Oceans at the Turn of the Century 145 (Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 1999)Google Scholar

Gold, E., From Process to Reality: Adopting Domestic Legislation for the Implementation of the Law of the Sea Convention, inVidas, D. & Østreng, W. (eds.), Order for the Oceans at the Turn of the Century 375 (Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 1999)Google Scholar

Göransson, M., The 1984 and 1992 Protocols to the Civil Liability Convention 1969 and the Fund Convention 1971, inde la Rue, C. (ed.), Liability for Damage to the Marine Environment (LLP, London, 1993)Google Scholar

Hargrove, J., Environment and the Third Conference on the Law of the Sea, inHargrove, J. (ed.), Who Protects the Oceans? 191 (West Pub. Co., St. Paul, MN, 1975)Google Scholar

Howe, N., ITLOS – A Practitioner's Perspective, inNordquist, M. H. & Moore, J. N., Current Marine Environmental Issues and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea 159 (Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 2001)Google Scholar

Koh, T. T. B., A Constitution for the Oceans, inThe Law of the Sea – United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, U.N. Pub. Sales No. E.83. V.5 xxiii (UN, 1983)Google Scholar

Kolossovsky, I. K., The Future of the U.N. Law of the Sea Convention and Maintenance of Legal Order and Peace in the Oceans in the 21st Century, inHong, S. Y. et al. (eds.), The Role of the Oceans in the 21st Century 321 (Law of the Sea Institute, University of Hawaii, 1995)Google Scholar

McDougal, M. S. et al., The World Constitutive Process of Authoritative Decision, inBlack, C. & Falk, R. (eds.), The Future of the International Legal Order 73 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1969)Google Scholar

Miles, E. L., Implementation of International Regimes: A Typology, inVidas, D. & Østreng, W. (eds.), Order for the Oceans at the Turn of the Century 327 (Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 1999)Google Scholar

Payer, H., Insurer and Class and Marine Accidents, inNordquist, M. H. & Moore, J. N., Current Marine Environmental Issues and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea 294 (Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 2001)Google Scholar

Pineschi, L., The Transit of Ships Carrying Hazardous Wastes Through Foreign Coastal Zones, inFrancioni, F. & Scovazzi, T. (eds.), International Responsibility for Environmental Harm 299 (Graham & Trotman, London, Boston, 1991)Google Scholar

Pineschi, L.,The EEC, Safety of Navigation and Vessel-Source Pollution, inMiles, E. L. & Treves, T. (eds.), The Law of the Sea: New Worlds, New Discoveries 526 (Law of the Sea Institute, University of Hawaii, 1993)Google Scholar

Plant, G., The Relationship Between International Navigation Rights and Environmental Protection: A Legal Analysis of Mandatory Ship Traffic Systems, inRingbom, H. (ed.), Competing Norms in the Law of Marine Environmental Protection – Focus on Ship Safety and Pollution Prevention 27 (Kluwer Law International, London, 1997)Google Scholar

Reisman, W. M., Sanctions and Enforcement, inBlack, C. & Falk, R. (eds.), 3 Conflict Management: The Future of the International Legal Order 273 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1971)Google Scholar

Ringbom, H., The Erika Accident and Its Effects on EU Maritime Regulation, inNordquist, M. H. & Moore, J. N., Current Marine Environmental Issues and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea 265 (Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 2001)Google Scholar

Roach, J. A., Alternatives for Achieving Flag State Implementation and Quality Shipping, inNordquist, M. H. & Moore, J. N. (eds.), Current Maritime Issues and the International Maritime Organization 151 (Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1999)Google Scholar

Roach, J. A.,Salient Issues in the Implementation of Regimes under the Law of the Sea Convention: An Overview, inVidas, D. & Østreng, W. (eds.), Order for the Oceans at the Turn of the Century 435 (Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 1999)Google Scholar

Roseanne, S., The International Maritime Organization Interface with the Law of the Sea Convention, inNordquist, M. H. & Moore, J. N. (eds.), Current Maritime Issues and the International Maritime Organization 251 (Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1999)Google Scholar

Schachte, Jr., W. L., The Value of the 1982 U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea: Preserving Our Freedoms and Protecting the Environment, inCouper, A. & Gold, E. (eds.), The Marine Environment and Sustainable Development: Law, Policy and Science 105 (Law of the Sea Institute, University of Hawaii, 1993)Google Scholar

Sielen, A. B. & McManus, R. J., IMCO and the Politics of Ship Pollution, inKay, D. & Jacobson, H. (eds.), Environmental Protection: The International Dimension (Allanheld, Osmun & Co., Totowa, NJ, 1983)Google Scholar

Sohn, L. B., Implications of the Law of the Sea Convention Regarding the Protection and Preservation of the Marine Environment, inKrueger, R. & Riesenfeld, S. (eds.), The Developing Order of the Oceans 106 (Law of the Sea Institute, University of Hawaii, 1985)Google Scholar

Stairs, K. & Taylor, P., Non-Governmental Organisations and the Legal Protection of the Oceans: A Case Study, inHurrell, A. & Kingsbury, B. (eds.), The International Politics of the Environment: Actors, Interests and Institutions 110 (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1992)Google Scholar

Teclaff, L. A., International Law and the Protection of the Oceans from Pollution, inTeclaff, L. A. & Utton, A. (eds.), International Environmental Law 104 (Praeger, New York, 1974)Google Scholar

Valenzuela, M., IMO: Public International Law and Regulation, inJohnston, D. M. & Letalik, N. (eds.), The Law of the Sea and Ocean Industry: New Opportunities and Restraints 141 (Law of the Sea Institute, University of Hawaii, 1984)Google Scholar

Valenzuela, M.,Enforcing Rules against Vessel-Source Degradation of the Marine Environment: Coastal, Flag and Port State Jurisdiction, inVidas, D. & Østreng, W. (eds.), Order for the Oceans at the Turn of the Century 485 (Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 1999)Google Scholar

VanderZwaag, D., Shipping and Marine Environmental Protection in Canada: Rocking the Boat and Riding a Restless Sea, inRothwell, D. & Bateman, S. (eds.), Navigational Rights and Freedoms and the New Law of the Sea 209 (Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 2000)Google Scholar

Vukas, B., Generally Accepted International Rules and Standards, inSoons, A. H. A. (ed.), Implementation of the Law of the Sea Convention Through International Institutions 405 (Law of the Sea Institute, University of Hawaii, 1990)Google Scholar

Vukas, B. & Vidas, D., Flags of Convenience and High Seas Fishing: The Emergence of a Legal Framework, inStokke, O. (ed.), Governing High Seas Fisheries: The Interplay of Global and Regional Regimes 53 (Oxford University Press, New York, 2001)CrossRef Google Scholar

Wolfrum, R., IMO Interface with the Law of the Sea Convention, inNordquist, M. H. & Moore, J. N. (eds.), Current Maritime Issues and the International Maritime Organization 223 (Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1999)Google Scholar

Churchill, R. R., The Meaning of the ‘Genuine Link’ Requirement in Relation to the Nationality of Ships, 2000, A Report for the International Transport Workers' Federation (ITF), available at http://www.oceanlaw.net/hedley/pubs/ITF-Oct2000.pdf

Clarkson, The Tanker Register (1994)

Drewry Shipping Consultants, Safer Ships (1992)

Drewry Shipping Consultants, Cost of Quality in Shipping: The Financial Implications of the Current Regulatory Environment (1998)

European Commission Directorate General for Energy and Transport, Memorandum: Erika – Two Years On (2001)

Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Shipping, Cmnd. 4337 (1970)

Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Safer Ships, Cleaner Seas – Report of Lord Donaldson's Inquiry into the Prevention of Pollution from Merchant Shipping, Cm. 2560 (1994) and Cm. 2766 (1995)

IMO/FAO/UNESCO/WMO/WHO/IAEA/UN/UNEP Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Pollution (GESAMP), The State of the Marine Environment, Rep. Stud. GESAMP No. 39 (1990)

IMO/FAO/UNESCO/WMO/WHO/IAEA/UN/UNEP Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Pollution (GESAMP), Impact of Oil and Related Chemicals and Wastes on the Marine Environment, Rep. Stud. GESAMP No. 50 (1993)

International Commission on Shipping (ICONS), Ships, Slaves and Competition (2001)

INTERTANKO, Tanker Trends and Economics (2002)

IOPC Funds, Claims Manual (2002)

Jacobs & Partners, World Oil Tanker Trends (1998)

Japan Maritime Research Institute, IMO Regulations Relating to Double-Hull Structure and Their Effects on Existing Tankers, Report No. 45 (1993)

Maritime Administration and US Coast Guard, Maritime Trade and Transportation 1999 (C. Moore, ed., 1999)

National Academy of Sciences, Petroleum in the Marine Environment, attached to MEPC Doc. 30/INF.13 (1990), International Maritime Organization (IMO), London

National Academy of Sciences, Oil in the Sea III: Inputs, Fates and Effects (2002)

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), OECD Study on Flags of Convenience (1973), reprinted in 4 J. Mar. L. & Com. 231 (1973)

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Non-Observance of International Rules and Standards: Competitive Advantages (1996), OCDE/GD(96)4, attached to MSC Doc. 66/12/1 (1996), International Maritime Organization (IMO), London

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Safety and Environmental Protection: Discussion Paper on Possible Actions to Combat Substandard Shipping by Involving Players Other than the Shipowner in the Shipping Market, OECD Doc. DSTI/DOT/MTC(98)10/final (1998)

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), The Cost to Users of Substandard Shipping (2001)

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Report on Ship Scrapping, OECD Doc. DSTI/DOT/MTC(2001)12 (2001), attached to MEPC Doc. 48/INF.2 (2002), International Maritime Organization (IMO), London

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Cost Savings Stemming from Non-Compliance with International Environmental Regulations in the Maritime Sector, DST/DOT/MTC/(2002)/8/final, attached to MEPC Doc. 49/INF.7 (2003), International Maritime Organization (IMO), London

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Ownership and Control of Ships (2003)

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Maritime Transport Committee Report on the Removal of Insurance from Substandard Shipping (2004)

Oude Elferink, A. G., The Genuine Link Concept: Time for a Post Mortem?, Netherlands Institute of the Law of the Sea Paper, available at http://www.uu.nl/content/genuine%20link.pdf

Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, Ships of Shame: Inquiry into Ship Safety (1992)

Petroleum Industry Resources Foundation, Transporting U.S. Oil Imports: The Impact of Oil Legislation on the Tanker Market (1992)

Preparatory Committee for the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Protection of Oceans, All Kinds of Seas Including Enclosed and Semi-enclosed Seas, Coastal Areas and the Protection, Rational Use and Development of Their Living Resources, UN Doc. A/CONF.151/PC/100/Add.21 (1991)

Report of IMO Comparative Study on Oil Tanker Designs, attached to MEPC Docs. 32/7/15 (1992) and 32/7/17/Add.1 (1992), International Maritime Organization (IMO), London

Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (1987)

White, I., Oil Spill Response – Experience, Trends and Challenges, ITOPF Paper (2000), available athttp://www.itopf.com/spillcon.pdf

Lloyd's List, Scathing Attack on SCA Article, 24 Feb. 1992

Lloyd's List, Shell Urges Tanker Crackdown, 21 Jan. 1993

Lloyd's List, ITF Says Greek Owners are Among Most Exploitative, 4 Dec. 1997

Lloyd's List, Greek Owners Set to Reject ITF Claims, 5 Dec. 1997

Lloyd's List, Oiling the Wheels of Misfortune, 27 Jan. 2000

Lloyd's List, Asia-Pacific Alert on Substandard Ships, 9 Mar. 2001

Lloyd's List, Leading the Fight in the Shipping Arena, 10 Mar. 2001

Lloyd's List, A Ship for Whose Convenience?, 12 Mar. 2001

Lloyd's List, Rule Out the Culture to Cut Corners, 26 Apr. 2001

Lloyd's List, Enforcement Cost of OPA 90 Regulations Put at $11 bn, 18 May 2001

Lloyd's List, IMO Budget Policy ‘is Not Viable’, 18 June 2001

Lloyd's List, Court Threat to EU States over Safety, 19 July 2001

Lloyd's List, TBT Manufacturers Lobby Diplomats Against Ban, 1 Oct. 2001

Lloyd's List, Credit Where Credit's Due, 2 Nov. 2001

Lloyd's List, Shipboard Solution ‘the Only Option’ for Ballast Contamination, 8 Nov. 2001

Lloyd's List, Power Shift at IMO, 27 Nov. 2001

Lloyd's List, Qualship 21 to Stay Tough on Flag States, 21 Jan. 2002

Lloyd's List, Tankers Dogged by Over-inspection, 29 Jan. 2002

Lloyd's List, Question of Societies' Liability Continues to Bubble Away, 4 Feb. 2002

Lloyd's List, USCG Dismisses Pleas for Secrecy, 27 Mar. 2002

Lloyd's List, OECD in Crackdown on Substandard Shipping, 15 Apr. 2002

Lloyd's List, Keeping IMO Reform on the Straight and Narrow, 19 Apr. 2002

Lloyd's List, IMO Buries Ownership Check, 1 May 2002

Lloyd's List, Lyras Hits Out at ‘Accident-led’ Response to Shipping's Woes, 4 June 2002

Lloyd's List, IMO Under Strain from Green Rules, 29 Apr. 2003

Lloyd's List, French Tanker Ban Stays until IMO Deal, 1 May 2003

Lloyd's List, ABS Backlash Puts Spain in the Dock for Prestige, 1 July 2003

Lloyd's List, Chorus of Disapproval for EU Directive on Handling Ship Waste, 30 Apr. 2004

Lloyd's List, Time Behind Bars: A New Barrier for Those Earning a Living at Sea, 10 Aug. 2004

Zafrul Alam, Permanent Mission of Singapore to IMO

Rosalie Balkin, International Maritime Organization

Lawrence Barchue, Sr., Permanent Mission of Liberia to IMO

Agustín Blanco-Bazán, International Maritime Organization

Michael Boock, Office of the Judge Advocate General, United States Navy

Alan Boyle, British Institute of International and Comparative Law

Andreas Chrysostomou, Permanent Mission of Cyprus to IMO

Patrick Chun, Permanent Mission of Hong Kong to IMO

James Cowley, Permanent Mission of Vanuatu to IMO

John De Rose, International Association of Classification Societies (IACS)

Kristina Gjerde, World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF)

Edgar Gold, Dalhousie University

Michael Grey, Lloyd's List

Patrick Griggs, Comité Maritime International (CMI)

Chris Horrocks, International Chamber of Shipping (ICS)

Måns Jacobsson, International Oil Pollution Compensation (IOPF) Funds

Douglas Johnston, University of Victoria

James Joyce, International Chamber of Shipping (ICS)

Sally Lentz, Friends of the Earth International (FOEI)

Nigel Maude, Permanent Mission of the Marshall Islands to IMO

Trygve Meyer, International Association of Independent Tanker Owners (INTERTANKO)

Anthony Nunn, International Union of Marine Insurers (IUMI)

Birgit Olsen, Permanent Mission of Denmark to IMO

William O'Neill, Secretary-General, International Maritime Organization

Stephen Pan, Worldwide Shipping, Singapore

Erik Røsæg, Permanent Mission of Norway to IMO

Jean-Claude Sainlos, International Maritime Organization

Yoshio Sasamura, Permanent Mission of Japan to IMO

Koji Sekimizu, International Maritime Organization

Richard Shaw, Comité Maritime International (CMI)

Joseph Slater, International Maritime Organization

Wayne Stuart, Permanent Mission of Australia to IMO

Teh Kong Leong, Neptune Orient Lines (Singapore) Limited

John Vercoe, Oil Companies International Marine Forum (OCIMF)

Lloyd Watkins, International Group of Protection and Indemnity Clubs

Ian White, International Tanker Owners Pollution Federation (ITOPF)

Tim Wilkins, International Association of Independent Tanker Owners (INTERTANKO)

John Wren, Permanent Mission of the United Kingdom to IMO