Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T03:18:12.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Ian Hacking
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almeida, Mauro W. and Barbosa, D. 1990. Symmetry and entropy: mathematical metaphors in the work of Lévi-Strauss. Current Anthropology 31: 367–85.Google Scholar
Ambrose, Alice. 1959. Proof and the theorem proved. Mind 68: 435–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Philip. 1972. More is different: broken symmetry and the nature of the hierarchical structure of science. Science 177: 393–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appel, K. and Haken, W. 1977. Every planar map is four colourable. Part i: Discharging. Illinois Journal of Mathematics 21: 429–90.Google Scholar
Appel, K., Haken, W., and Koch, J. 1977. Every planar map is four colourable. Part ii: Reducibility. Illinois Journal of Mathematics 21: 491–567.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle, revised Oxford translation, ed. Barnes, Jonathan, 2 vols. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Aschbacher, Michael and Smith, Stephen D. 2004. The Classification of Quasithin Groups. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs vols. 111, 112. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
Asper, Markus. 2009. The two cultures of mathematics in ancient Greece. In Robson, E. and Stedall, J. (eds.) Oxford Handbook of the History of Mathematics. Oxford University Press, 107–32Google Scholar
Aspray, William and Kitcher, Philip. 1988. History and Philosophy of Modern Mathematics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Atiyah, Michael. 1984. An interview with Michael Atiyah. The Mathematical Intelligencer 6: 9–19.Google Scholar
Atiyah, Michael. n.d. Sir Michael Atiyah on math, physics and fun. Available at: .
Atiyah, Michael and Sutcliffe, Paul. 2003. Polyhedra in physics, chemistry and geometry. Milan Journal of Mathematics 71: 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atiyah, Michael, Dijkgraaf, Robbert, and Hitchin, Nigel. 2010. Geometry and physics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 368: 913–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Austin, John Langshaw. 1961. The meaning of a word. In Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 23–43.Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J. 1946. Language, Truth and Logic, second edn, revised. London: Victor Gollancz; first edn 1936.Google Scholar
Ayers, Michael. 1991. Locke. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Azzouni, Jody. 2004. Deflating Existential Consequence: A Case for Nominalism. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacon, Francis. 1857−74. The Works of Francis Bacon, ed. Spedding, J., Ellis, R., and Heath, D., 3 vols. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Baker, Alan. 2008. Experimental mathematics. Erkenntnis 68: 331–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, G. P. and Hacker, P. M. S. 2005. Wittgenstein. Understanding and Meaning: An Analytical Commentary on the Philosophical Investigations, second extensively revised edn by Hacker, Peter. Oxford: Blackwell; first edn 1980.Google Scholar
Balaguer, Mark. 1998. Platonism and Anti-Platonism in Mathematics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ball, Philip. 2012. Proof claimed for deep connection between primes. Nature 12 September. Available at: .Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, Simon. 2002. The extreme male brain theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6: 248–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron-Cohen, Simon. 2003. The Essential Difference: Men, Women and the Extreme Male Brain. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, Simon, Wheelwright, S., Scott, C., Bolton, P., and Goodyear, I. 1997. Is there a link between engineering and autism?Autism, 1, 101–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barzin, Marcel. 1935. Sur la crise contemporaine des mathématiques. L’Enseignement mathématique 34: 5–11.Google Scholar
Benacerraf, Paul. 1965. What numbers could not be. Philosophical Review 74: 47–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benacerraf, Paul. 1967. God, the devil, and Gödel. The Monist 51: 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benacerraf, Paul. 1973. Mathematical truth. Journal of Philosophy 70: 661–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benacerraf, Paul and Putnam, Hilary. 1964. Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Benacerraf, Paul and Putnam, Hilary. 1983. Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings, second and much modified edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bernays, Paul. 1935a. Sur la platonisme mathématique. L’Enseignement mathématique 34: 52–69.Google Scholar
Bernays, Paul. 1935b. Quelques points essentiels de la métamathématique. L’Enseignement mathématique 34: 70–95.Google Scholar
Bernays, Paul. 1964. Comments on Ludwig Wittgenstein’sRemarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, trans. from the German original. Ratio 2 (1959): 1–22, in Benacerraf and Putnam (1964: 510–28). See also the online Bernays Project, available at: , text 23.Google Scholar
Bernays, Paul. 1983. On platonism in mathematics, trans. Charles Parsons of Bernays (1935a). In Benacerraf and Putnam (1983: 258–71). For a slightly revised translation, see the online Bernays Project, available at: , text 1.
Blake, William. 1957. The Complete Writings of William Blake, ed. Keynes, Geoffrey. London: Nonesuch Press.Google Scholar
Błaszczyk, Piotr, Katz, Mikhail, and Sherry, David. 2013. Ten misconceptions from the history of analysis and their debunking. Foundations of Science 18: 43–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloor, David. 2011. The Enigma of the Aerofoil: Rival Theories in Aerodynamics 1909–1930. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boolos, George. 1971. The iterative conception of set. Journal of Philosophy 68: 215–31. Reprinted in Benacerraf and Putnam (1983: 486–502).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boolos, George. 1987. The consistency of Frege’s Foundations of Arithmetic. In Jeffrey, Richard (ed.) Logic, Logic and Logic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 183–201.Google Scholar
Boolos, George. 1998. Must we believe in set theory? In Jeffrey, Richard (ed.) Logic, Logic, and Logic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 120–31.Google Scholar
Borcherds, Richard. 2011. Renormalization and quantum field theory. Algebra and Number Theory 5: 627–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourbaki, N. 1939. Éléments de mathématique. Paris: Hermann. There are nine postwar volumes of the project; a final fascicule, on commutative algebra, appeared in 1998.Google Scholar
Boyer, Carl B. 1991. A History of Mathematics, second edn, revised by Merzbach, Uta C.. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Brooks, R. L., Smith, C. A. B., Stone, A. H., and Tutte, W. T. 1940. The dissection of rectangles into squares. Duke Mathematical Journal 7: 312–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Gary I. 1991. The evolution of the term ‘Mixed Mathematics’. Journal of the History of Ideas 52: 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, James Robert. 2008. Philosophy of Mathematics. A Contemporary Introduction to the World of Proofs and Pictures, second edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, James Robert. 2012. Platonism, Naturalism, and Mathematical Knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burgess, John P. 2008. Mathematics, Models, and Modality: Selected Philosophical Essays. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, John P. and Rosen, Gideon. 1997. A Subject with no Object: Strategies for a Nominalistic Interpretation of Mathematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, Miles. 2000. Plato on why mathematics is good for the soul. In Smiley, T. J. (ed.) Mathematics and Necessity: Essays in the History of Philosophy. Oxford University Press for the British Academy, 1–82.Google Scholar
Butler, Joseph. 1827. Fifteen Sermons Preached at the Rolls Chapel. Cambridge: Hilliard and Brown; Boston: Hilliard, Gray, Little, and Wilkins.Google Scholar
Buzaglo, Meir. 2002. The Logic of Concept Expansion. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carey, Susan. 2009. The Origin of Concepts. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. 1950. Empiricism, semantics, and ontology. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4: 20–40. Reprinted in Benacerraf and Putnam (1983: 241–57).Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy. 1983. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cauchy, Augustin-Louis. 1821. Cours d’analyse de l’École Polytechnique. Paris: Imprimerie Royale.Google Scholar
Chemla, Karine and Shuchun, Guo. 2004. Les neuf chapitres: le classique mathématique de la Chine ancienne et ses commentaires. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
Changeux, Jean-Pierre and Connes, Alain. 1995. Conversations on Mind, Matter, and Mathematics, Princeton University Press. French original, Matière à penser. Paris: Odile Jacob, 1989.Google Scholar
Chevreul, Eugène. 1816. Recherches chimiques sur les corps gras, et particulièrement sur leurs combinaisons avec les alcalis. Sixième mémoire – examen des graisses d’homme, de mouton, de bœuf, de jaguar et d’oie. Annales de Chimie et de Physique 2: 339–72.Google Scholar
Chihara, Charles. 2004. A Structural Account of Mathematics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chihara, Charles. 2010. New directions for nominalist philosophers of mathematics. Synthese 176: 153–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1966. Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cipra, Barry. 2002. Think and grow rich. In What’s Happening in the Mathematical Sciences, vol. v. Washington: American Mathematical Society, 77–87.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. Bernard. 1985. Revolution in Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Paul J. 1966. Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis. New York: Benjamin.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. 1835. Specimens of the Table Talk of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, ed. Coleridge, Henry Nelson, 2 vols. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Colyvan, Mark. 2010. There is no easy road to nominalism. Mind 119: 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colyvan, Mark. 2011. Indispensability arguments in the philosophy of mathematics. InStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N. (spring 2011 edn). Available at: .Google Scholar
Conant, J. B. 1952. Modern Science and Modern Man. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Connelly, Robert. 1999. Tensegrity structures: why are they stable? In Thorpe, M. F. and Duxbury, P. M. (eds.) Rigidity Theory and Applications. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum, 47−54.Google Scholar
Connes, Alain. 2000. La réalité mathématique archaïque. La Recherche 332: 109.Google Scholar
Connes, Alain. 2004. Repenser l’espace et la symétrie. La Recherche 381: 27.Google Scholar
Connes, Alain and Kreimer, Dirk. 2000. Renormalization in quantum field theory and the Riemann−Hilbert problem. i. The Hopf algebra structure of graphs and the main theorem. Communications in Mathematical Physics 210: 249–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connes, Alain, Lichnerowicz, André, and Schützenberger, Marcel Paul. 2001. Triangle of Thoughts. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. French original: Triangle des pensées. Paris: Odile Jacob, 2000.Google Scholar
Conway, John. 2001. On Numbers and Games, second edn. Natick, MA: A. K. Peters.Google Scholar
Conway, John, Burgiel, Heidi, and Goodman-Strauss, Chaim. 2008. The Symmetries of Things. Wellesley, MA: A. K. Peters.Google Scholar
Corfield, David. 2003. Towards a Philosophy of Real Mathematics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corry, Leo. 2009. Writing the ultimate mathematical textbook: Nicolas Bourbaki’s Éléments de mathématique. In Robson, E. and Stedall, J. (eds.) Oxford Handbook of the History of Mathematics. Oxford University Press, 565–87.Google Scholar
Courant, Richard and Robbins, Herbert. 1996. What is Mathematics? An Elementary Approach to Ideas and Methods, second edn, revised by Stewart, Ian. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crombie, A. C. 1994. Styles of Scientific Thinking in the European Tradition: The History of Argument and Explanation Especially in the Mathematical and Biomedical Sciences and Arts, 3 vols. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Dahan-Dalmedico, A. 1986. Un texte de philosophie mathématique de Gergonne (mémoire inédit déposé à l’Académie de Bordeaux). Revue de l’ Histoire des Sciences 39: 97–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daston, Lorraine. 1988. Fitting numbers to the world: the case of probability theory. In Aspray and Kitcher (1988: 221–37).
Davis, Chandler. 1994. Where did twentieth-century mathematics go wrong? In Chikara, Sasaki, Mitsuo, Sugiura, and Dauben, Joseph W. (eds.) The Intersection of History and Mathematics. Boston: Birkhäuser, 120–42.Google Scholar
Davis, Martin. 2000. The Universal Computer: The Road from Leibniz to Turing. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Dawson, John. 2008. The reception of Gödel’s incompleteness theorem. In Drucker, Thomas (ed.) Perspectives on the History of Mathematical Logic. Boston: Birkhäuser, 84–100.Google Scholar
Dedekind, Richard. 1996. What are numbers and what should they be? In Ewald (1996: 787–832). (Translation of Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen? Braunschweig: Vieweg, 1888.)
Dehaene, Stanislas. 1997. The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. London: Allen Lane/Penguin.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel. 2003. Freedom Evolves. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1994. Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International. New York: Routledge. Original: Spectres de Marx. Paris: Galilée, 1993.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. 1954. The Geometry of René Descartes, trans. from the French of 1637 and Latin of 1649 by Smith, D. E. and Latham, M. L.. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. 1971. Philosophical Writings, ed. and trans. Anscombe, E. and Geach, P. T.. London: Nelson.Google Scholar
Detlefsen, Michael. 1998. Mathematics, foundations of. In Craig, E. (ed.) Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 10 vols. London and New York: Routledge, vol. vi, 181–92.Google Scholar
Dirac, P. A. M. 1939. The relation between mathematics and physics. Proceedings of the Royal Society (Edinburgh) 59 (ii): 122–29. Reprinted in The Collected Works of P. A. M. Dirac, 1924–1948, ed. R. H. Dalitz. Cambridge University Press, 1995, 907–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Mary and Wildavsky, Aaron. 1982. Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Doxiadis, Apostolos and Mazur, Barry (eds.). 2012. Circles Disturbed: The Interplay of Mathematics and Narrative. Princeton University Press.
Dudeny, Henry Ernest. 1907. The Canterbury Puzzles, and Other Curious Problems. London: Nelson. Available online from Project Gutenberg.Google Scholar
Dudeny, Henry Ernest. 1917. Amusements in Mathematics. London: Nelson. Available online from Project Gutenberg.Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael. 1973. Frege: Philosophy of Language. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael. 1978. Truth and Other Enigmas. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael. 1980. Frege and analytical philosophy. London Review of Books, 18 September.
Dummett, Michael. 1991. Frege: Philosophy of Mathematics. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Edwards, Harold M. 1987. An appreciation of Kronecker. Mathematical Intelligencer 9: 28–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Harold M. 2005. Essays in Constructive Mathematics. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Eckert, Michael. 2006. The Dawn of Fluid Dynamics: A Discipline Between Science and Technology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Everitt, C. W. F. 1975. James Clerk Maxwell: Physicist and Natural Philosopher. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Ewald, William. 1996. From Kant to Hilbert: Readings in the Foundations of Mathematics, 2 vols. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ferreirós, José. 1999. Labyrinth of Thought: A History of Set Theory and its Role in Modern Mathematics. Basel: Birkhäuser; revised edn with similar pagination, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreirós, José. 2007. Ό Θεός Άριθμητίζει: The rise of pure mathematics as arithmetic with Gauss. In Goldstein, Schappacher, and Schwermer (2007: 235–68).
Field, Hartry. 1980. Science without Numbers: A Defence of Nominalism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fine, Kit. 1998. Cantorian abstraction: A reconstruction and a defense. Journal of Philosophy 95: 599–634.Google Scholar
Fisch, Max. 1982. Introduction to Volume 1. In Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, xiv–xxv.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Michael. 2004. Autism and Creativity: Is there a Link between Autism in Men and Exceptional Ability?Hove, East Sussex: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Michael. 2005. The Genesis of Artistic Creativity: Asperger’s Syndrome and the Arts. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Michael. 2009. Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Creativity, Novelty Seeking, and Risk. New York: Nova.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Michael and James, Ioan. 2007. The Mind of the Mathematician. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Michael and O’Brien, Brendan. 2007. Genius Genes: How Asperger Talents Changed the World. Shawnee Mission, KS: Autism Asperger Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1884. Die Grunlagen der Arithmetic. Eine logisch-mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl. Breslau. The Foundations of Arithmetic: A Logico-Mathematical Enquiry into the Concept of Number, trans. Austin, J. L., second revised edn. Oxford: Blackwell, 1953.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1892. Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100: 25–50.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1949. On sense and nominatum. Herbert Feigl’s translation of Frege 1892. In Feigl, H. and Sellars, W., Readings in Philosophical Analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Croft, 85–102.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1952. Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, trans. Geach, Peter and Black, Max. Oxford: Blackwell; third revised edn. 1980.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1967. The Basic Laws of Arithmetic: Exposition of the System. Montgomery Furth’s translation of selections from Grundgesetze der Arithmetik. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1997. The Frege Reader, ed. Beaney, Michael. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 1992. Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gabbay, Dov (ed.). 1994. What is a Logical System?Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Galison, Peter. 1979. Minkowski’s space-time: from visual thinking to the absolute world. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 10: 85–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garber, Daniel. 1992. Descartes’ Metaphysical Physics. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, Martin. 1978. Aha! Aha! Insight. New York: Scientific American.Google Scholar
Gauss, Karl Friedrich. 1900. Werke, vol. : Arithmetik und Algebra. Leibniz: Teubner; reproduced Hildesheim: Olms, 1981.Google Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen. 1989. Cartesian Logic: An Essay on Descartes’ Conception of Inference. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen. 1995. Descartes: An Intellectual Biography. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gelbart, Stephen. 1984. An elementary introduction to the Langlands program. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 10: 177–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gergonne, Joseph Diaz. 1810. Prospectus. Annales de mathématiques pures et appliquées 1: i−iv.Google Scholar
Gergonne, Joseph Diaz. 1818. Essai sur la théorie des définitions. Annales de mathématiques pures et appliquées 9: 1–35.Google Scholar
Gingras, Yves. 2001. What did mathematics do to physics?History of Science 39: 383–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gödel, Kurt. 1983. What is Cantor’s continuum problem? A revised version of the paper inAmerican Mathematical Monthly 54 (1947): 515–25, prepared for Benacerraf and Putnam (1964) and reprinted in Benacerraf and Putnam (1983: 470–85).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gödel, Kurt. 1995. Some basic theorems on the foundations of mathematics and their implications. The Gibbs Lecture to the American Mathematical Society, 1951. In Feferman, Solomon et al. (eds.) Kurt Gödel: Collected Works, 5 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, vol. iii, 304–23.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Catherine, Schappacher, Norbert, and Schwermer, Joachim (eds.). 2007. The Shaping of Arithmetic: After C. F. Gauss’s Disquisitiones Arithmeticae. Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
Goodman, Nelson, and Quine, W. V. 1947. Steps toward a constructive nominalism. Journal of Symbolic Logic 12: 105–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowers, Timothy. n.d. The two cultures of mathematics. Available at: .
Gowers, Timothy. 2002. Mathematics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowers, Timothy. 2006. Does mathematics need a philosophy? In Hersh, Reuben (ed.) 18 Unconventional Essays on the Nature of Mathematics. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, 182–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowers, Timothy. (ed.). 2008. The Princeton Companion to Mathematics. Princeton University Press.
Gowers, Timothy. 2012. Vividness in mathematics and narrative. In Doxiadis and Mazur (2012: 211–31).
Grabiner, Judith. 1981. The Origins of Cauchy’s Rigorous Calculus. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grattan-Guinness, Ivor. 2000. A sideways look at Hilbert’s twenty-three problems of 1900. Notices of the American Mathematical Society 47: 752–7.Google Scholar
Griess, Robert. 1982. The friendly giant. Inventiones Mathematicae 69: 1–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guéroult, Martial. 1953. Descartes selon l’ordre des raisons, 2 vols. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
Haas, Karlheinz. 2008. Carl Friedrich Hindenberg. In Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography. Available at: .Google Scholar
Hacker, Andrew. 2012. Is algebra necessary? New York Times Sunday Review, 29 July.
Hacker, P. M. S. 1996. Wittgenstein’s Place in Twentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 1962. Part i: Proof; Part ii: Strict implication and natural deduction. Cambridge University PhD, 4160.
Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 1973. Leibniz and Descartes: proof and eternal truth. Proceedings of the British Academy 59: 175–188. Reprinted in Hacking (2002: 200–13).Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 1974. Infinite analysis. Studia Leibniz 6: 126–30.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 1979. What is logic?Journal of Philosophy 86: 285–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 1982. Wittgenstein as philosophical psychologist. New York Review of Books, 1 April. Reprinted in Hacking (2002: 214–26).Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 1984. Where does math come from? New York Review of Books, 16 February.
Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 1990. The Taming of Chance. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 1996. The disunities of the sciences. In Galison, P. and Stump, D. J. (eds.) The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts and Power. Stanford University Press, 37–74.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 1999. The Social Construction of What?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 2000a. How inevitable are the results of successful science?Philosophy of Science 67: S58−S71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 2000b. What mathematics has done to some and only some philosophers. In Smiley, T. J. (ed.) Mathematics and Necessity: Essays in the History of Philosophy. Oxford University Press for the British Academy, 83–138.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 2002. Historical Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 2006. Casimir Lewy 1919–1991. Proceedings of the British Academy 138: 170–7.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 2007. Trees of logic, trees of porphyry. In Heilbron, J. (ed.) Advancements of Learning: Essays in Honour of Paolo Rossi. Florence: Olshki, 146–97.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 2011a. Why is there philosophy of mathematics AT ALL?South African Journal of Philosophy 30: 1–15. Reprinted in Mircea Pitti (ed.) Best Writing in Mathematics 2011, Princeton University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 2011b. Wittgenstein, necessity and the application of mathematics. South African Journal of Philosophy 30: 80–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 2012a. ‘Language, truth and reason’ thirty years later. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 43: 599−609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 2012b. The lure of Pythagoras. Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly 61: 1−26.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 2012c. Introductory essay. In Kuhn, T. S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 50th anniversary edition. University of Chicago Press, vii−xxviii.Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre. 2006. The Veil of Isis: An Essay on the History of the Idea of Nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Original: Paris: Gallimard, 2004.Google Scholar
Hale, Bob. 1987. Abstract Objects. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hamilton, William Rowan. 1833. Introductory lecture on astronomy. Dublin University Review and Quarterly Magazine 1: 72–85.Google Scholar
Hamilton, William Rowan. 1837. Theory of conjugate functions, or algebraic concepts, with a preliminary and elementary essay on algebra as the science of pure time. Transactions of the Royal Irish Academy 17: 293–422.Google Scholar
Hamilton, William Rowan. 1853. Lectures on quaternions; containing a systematic statement of a new mathematical method; of which the principles were communicated in 1843 to the Royal Irish academy; &c. Dublin: Hodges and Smith.Google Scholar
Harris, Michael. Forthcoming. Not Merely Good, True and Beautiful. Princeton University Press.
Hardy, G. H. 1908. A Course of Pure Mathematics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hardy, G. H. 1929. Mathematical proof. Mind 38: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, G. H. 1940. A Mathematician’s Apology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hardy, G. H. and Wright, E. M. 1938. An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Heilbron, John. 2010. Galileo. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hellman, Geoffrey. 1989. Mathematics without Numbers. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hellman, Geoffrey. 2001. Three varieties of mathematical structuralism. Philosophia Mathematica 9: 184–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C. G. 1945. On the nature of mathematical truth. American Mathematical Monthly 52: 543–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbrand, Jacques. 1967a. Investigations in proof theory: The properties of true propositions. In Van Heijenoort (1967: 525–81). French original 1930.
Herbrand, Jacques. 1967b. On the consistency of arithmetic. In Van Heijenoort (1967: 618–28). French original 1931.
Herodotus, . 1972. Histories. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Hersh, Reuben. 1997. What is Mathematics, Really?Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hersh, Reuben. (ed.). 2006. 18 Unconventional Essays on the Nature of Mathematics. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.CrossRef
Hesse, Mary. 1966. Models and Analogies in Science. University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Hobbs, Arthur M. and Oxley, James G. 2004. William T. Tutte (1917–2002). Notices of the American Mathematical Society 51: 320–30.Google Scholar
Hofweber, Thomas. 2005. Number determiners, numbers, and arithmetic. Philosophical Review 114: 179–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofweber, Thomas. 2007. Innocent statements and their metaphysically loaded counterparts. The Philosophers Imprint 7(1).Google Scholar
Hon, Giora and Goldstein, Bernard. 2008. From Summetria to Symmetry: The Making of a Revolutionary Scientific Concept. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horsten, Leon. 2007. Philosophy of mathematics. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, E. N. (winter 2007 edn). Available at: .Google Scholar
Høyrup, Jens. 1990. Sub-scientific mathematics: observations on a pre-modern phenomenon. History of Science 28: 63–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Høyrup, Jens. 2005. Leonardo Fibonacci and the abbaco culture: a proposal to invert the roles. Revue d’Histoire des Mathématiques 11: 23–56.Google Scholar
Høyrup, Jens. n.d. For much more work, and difficult-to-locate or unpublished papers on abbaco culture, see .
Husserl, Edmund. 1970. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy, trans. from the German edition of 1954 by Carr, David. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Huizinga, Johan. 1949. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-element in Culture. London: Routledge. Trans. from German (Swiss) edition of 1940. Dutch original online in Digitale Biblioteek voor de Nederlandse Letteren, DBNL.Google Scholar
Institute for Advanced Study. 2010. The fundamental lemma: from minor irritant to central problem. The Institute Letter. Princeton, NJ: IAS, pp. 1, 4, 5, 7.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Arthur and Quinn, Frank. 1993. ‘Theoretical mathematics’: toward a cultural synthesis of mathematics and theoretical physics. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 29: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W. E. 1892. The logical calculus i. General principles. Mind new series 1: 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Charles. 2001. Pythagoras and Pythagoreans. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Kanovei, Vladimir, Katz, Mikhail G., and Mormann, Thomas. 2013. Tools, objects, and chimeras: Connes on the role of hyperreals in mathematics. Foundations of Science 18(2): 259−96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1929. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Smith, Norman Kemp.London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1992. Concerning the ultimate ground of the differentiation of directions in space. In Walford, D. and Meerbote, R., Immanuel Kant: Theoretical Philosophy 1775–1770, Cambridge University Press, 365–72. Original 1768.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1997a. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics that Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science, trans. Hatfield, Gary. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1997b. Lectures on Metaphysics, trans. Ameriks, K. and Naragon, S.. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, David. 1975. How to Russell a Frege-Church. Journal of Philosophy, 772: 716–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapustin, Anton and Witten, Edward. 2006. Electric-magnetic duality and the geometric Langlands program. Available at: .
Kästner, Abraham Gotthelf. 1780. Anfangsgründe der angewandten Mathematik. i. Mechanische und Optische Wissenschaften. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher and Stanley, Jason. 2009. On ‘average’. Mind 118: 583–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. 1983. The Nature of Mathematical Knowledge. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, Jacob. 1968. Greek Mathematical Thought and the Origin of Algebra, trans. Brann, E.. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kline, Morris. 1953. Mathematics in Western Culture. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kline, Morris. 1980. Mathematics: The Loss of Certainty. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kochan, Jeff. 2006. Rescuing the Gorgias from Latour. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36: 395–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knorr, Wilbur. 1975. The Evolution of the Euclidean Elements: A Study of the Theory of Incommensurable Magnitudes and its Significance for Early Greek Geometry. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knorr, Wilbur. 1986. The Ancient Tradition of Geometric Problems. Boston: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
Kremer, Michael. 2008. Soames on 1980’s logic: a reply. Philosophical Studies 139: 209–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreisel, Georg. 1958. Wittgenstein’s remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 9: 135–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieger, Martin H. 1987. The physicist’s toolkit. American Journal of Physics 55: 1033–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieger, Martin H. 1992. Doing Physics: How Physicists Take Hold of the World. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul. 1965. Semantical analysis of intuitionistic logic. In Crossley, J. and Dummett, M. A. E. (eds.) Formal Systems and Recursive Functions. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 92–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, Saul. 1980. Naming and Necessity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1977. Second thoughts on paradigms. In Kuhn, Thomas S., The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. University of Chicago Press, 293–319; first published 1974.Google Scholar
Ladyman, James. 2009. Structural realism. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N. (summer 2009 edn). Available at: .Google Scholar
Laird, W. R. 1997. Galileo and the mixed sciences. In Di Liscia, Daniel A. et al. (eds.) Method and Order in the Renaissance Philosophy of Nature. Aldershot: Ashgate, 253–70.Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imre. 1963–4. Proofs and refutations. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 15: Part i, 1–25, Part ii, 120–39, Part iii, 221–45, Part iv, 296–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, Imre. 1976. Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery. Expanded version of Lakatos (1963–4), ed. Worrall, John and Zahar, Elie. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlands, Robert. 2010. Is there beauty in mathematical theories? Available at: .
Langlands, Robert. n.d. Website collecting Langlands’ work. Available at: , but is now kept up at .
Latour, Bruno. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2008. The Netz-works of Greek deductions. Social Studies of Science 38: 441–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennox, James G. 1986. Aristotle, Galileo, and ‘mixed sciences’. In Wallace, W. (ed.) Reinterpreting Galileo. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America, 29–51.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1954. The mathematics of man. International Social Science Bulletin 6: 581–90.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1969. The Elementary Structures of Kinship. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode. French original: Les structures élémentaires de la parenté, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1949.Google Scholar
Liggins, David. 2008. Quine, Putnam, and the ‘Quine−Putnam’ indispensability argument. Erkenntnis 68: 113–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlewood, J. E. 1953. A Mathematician’s Miscellany. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Linsky, Bernard. 2009. Logical constructions. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N. (winter 2009 edn). Available at: .Google Scholar
Lloyd, Geoffrey. 1990. Demystifying Mentalities. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, John. 1961. Minds, machines and Gödel. Philosophy 36: 112–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Translated from the French of 1979.Google Scholar
MacFarlane, John. 2009. Logical constants. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N. (fall 2009 edn). Available at:.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Donald. 1993. Negotiating arithmetic, constructing proof: the sociology of mathematics and information technology. Social Studies of Science 23(1): 27–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, Donald. 2001. Mechanizing Proof: Computing, Risk, and Trust. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Maddy, Penelope. 1997. Naturalism in Mathematics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maddy, Penelope. 1998. How to be a naturalist about mathematics. In Dales, H. G. and Oliveri, G. (eds.) Truth in Mathematics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maddy, Penelope. 2001. Naturalism: friends and foes. Philosophical Perspectives 15: 37–67.Google Scholar
Maddy, Penelope. 2005. Three forms of naturalism. In Shapiro, S. (ed.) Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic. Oxford University Press, 437–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddy, Penelope. 2007. Second Philosophy: A Naturalistic Method. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddy, Penelope. 2008. How applied mathematics became pure. Review of Symbolic Logic 1: 16–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancosu, Paolo. 1998. From Brouwer to Hilbert: The Debate on the Foundations of Mathematics in the 1920s. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mancosu, Paolo. 2009a. Measuring the size of infinite collections of natural numbers: was Cantor’s theory of infinite number inevitable?Review of Symbolic Logic 2: 612–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancosu, Paolo. 2009b. Mathematical style. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N. (spring 2010 edn). Available at: .Google Scholar
Manders, Kenneth. 1989. Domain extension and the philosophy of mathematics. Journal of Philosophy 86: 553–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin-Löf, Per. 1996. On the meanings of the logical constants and the justifications of the logical laws. Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 1: 11–60.Google Scholar
Mashaal, Maurice. 2006. Bourbaki: A Secret Society of Mathematicians. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. Translation of Bourbaki: une société secrète de mathématiciens. Paris: Belin, 2002.Google Scholar
Masters, Alexander. 2011. Simon: The Genius in my Basement. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
Masters, Alexander. 2012. Meet the mathematical ‘genius in my basement’. An interview on 26 February with (US) National Public Radio. Available at: npr.org.
Mazur, Barry. n.d. Questions about number. Available at: .
Maxwell, James Clerk. 1882. Does the progress of Physical Science tend to give any advantage to the opinion of Necessity (or Determinism) over that of the Contingency of Events and the Freedom of the Will? (read 11 February 1873). In Campbell, L. and Garnett, W., The Life of James Clerk Maxwell, with Selections from his Correspondence and Occasional Writings. London: Macmillan, 434–44.Google Scholar
Melia, Joseph. 1995. On what there’s not. Analysis 55: 223–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melia, Joseph. 2000. Weaseling away the indispensability argument. Mind 109: 455–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mews, Constant J. 1992. Nominalism and theology before Abelard: new light on Roscelin of Compiègne. Vivarium 30: 4–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mews, Constant J. 2002. Reason and Belief in the Age of Roscelin and Abelard. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Mialet, Hélène. 2012. Hawking Incorporated: Stephen Hawking and the Anthropology of the Knowing Subject. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1965−83. Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, ed. Robson, J., 28 vols. Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
Minkowski, Hermann. 1909. Raum und Zeit. Jahresberichte der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 20: 1–14. Translated in The Principle of Relativity: A Collection Of Original Memoirs on the Special and General Theory of Relativity. London: Methuen, 1923.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1900. Necessity. Mind new series 9: 283–304.Google Scholar
Mühlhölzer, Felix. 2006. ‘A mathematical proof must be surveyable’ – what Wittgenstein meant by this and what it implies. Grazer Philosophische Studien 71: 57–86.Google Scholar
Murakami, Haruki. 2011. IQ84. New York: Knopf. Translated from the Japanese original of 2009–10.Google Scholar
Ne’eman, Yuval. 2000. Pythagorean and Platonic conceptions of xxth century physics. In Alon, N. et al. (eds.) GAFA 2000: Visions in Mathematics Towards 2000. Basel: Birkhäuser, 383–405.Google Scholar
Nelson, Edward. 1977. Internal set theory: a new approach to nonstandard analysis. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 83: 1165–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netz, Reviel. 1999. The Shaping of Deduction in Greek Mathematics: A Study in Cognitive History. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netz, Reviel. 2009. Ludic Proof: Greek Mathematics and the Alexandrian Aesthetic. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netz, Reviel and Noel, William. 2007. The Archimedes Codex: Revealing the Secrets of the World’s Greatest Palimpsest. London: Wiedenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Núñez, Rafael. 2011. No innate number line in the human brain. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 45: 651−68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Charles. 1964. Frege’s theory of number. In Black, Max (ed.) Philosophy in America. New York: Cornell University Press, 180–203.Google Scholar
Parsons, Charles. 1990. The structuralist view of mathematical objects. Synthese 84: 303–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Charles. 2008. Mathematical Thought and its Objects. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, Benjamin. 1881. Linear associative algebra. American Journal of Mathematics 4: 97−229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1931–58. Collected Papers, ed. Hartshorne, Charles and Weiss, Paul, 8 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. References are given by volume and paragraph number, rather than pages, thus CP 4: 235 (1902) means paragraph 235 in vol. 4, dating from 1902.Google Scholar
Pierce, Roy. 1966. Contemporary French Political Thought. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Penrose, Roger. 1997. The Large, the Small and the Human Mind. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pickering, Andrew. 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato. 1997. Plato: Complete Works, ed. Cooper, John M.. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Polya, Georg. 1948. How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. Princeton University Press. Reprinted 2004 with a valuable foreword by John Conway.Google Scholar
Polya, Georg. 1954. Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning, vol. : Induction and Analogy in Mathematics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Poncelet, Jean-Victor. 1822. Traité des propriétés projectives des figures. Paris: Bachelier.Google Scholar
Poncelet, Jean-Victor. 1836. Expériences faites à Metz, en 1834 . . . sur les batteries de brèche, sur la pénétration des projectiles dans divers milieux résistans, et sur la rupture des corps par le choc, suivies du rapport fait, sur ces expériences, à l’Académie des sciences . . . le 12 octobre 1835. Paris: Corréard jeune.Google Scholar
Poncelet, Jean-Victor. 1839. Introduction à la mécanique industrielle, physique ou expérimentale. Metz: Mme Thiel; Paris: Eugène André; first edn 1829.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl. 1962. The Open Society and its Enemies, vol. i: Plato. London: Routledge; first edn 1945.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1971. Philosophy of Logic. New York: Harper. Reprinted in Putnam (1979).Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1975a. What is mathematical truth? In Putnam, Hilary, Philosophical Papers, vol. i: Mathematics, Matter and Method. Cambridge University Press, 60–78.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1975b. The meaning of ‘meaning’. In Putnam, Hilary, Philosophical Papers, vol. : Mind, Language and Reality. Cambridge University Press, 215–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1979. Philosophy of logic. In Putnam, Hilary, Philosophical Papers, vol. : Mathematics, Matter and Method, second edn. Cambridge University Press, 323−57. Reprint of Putnam (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1982. Peirce the logician. Historia Mathematica 9: 290–301. Reprinted in his Realism with a Human Face. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990, 252–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1994. Rethinking mathematical necessity. In Words and Life ed. Conant, James. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 245–63.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1936. Truth by convention. In Lee, Otis H. (ed.) Philosophical Essays for A. N. Whitehead. New York: Russell and Russell, 90–124. Original reprinted in Benacerraf and Putnam (1964: 322–45); reprinted with mild revisions in W. V. Quine, Ways of Paradox. New York: Random House, 1966.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1950. Methods of Logic. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1953. On what there is. In From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1–19. (From page 149 of the book: this paper first appeared in the Review of Metaphysics in 1948, earlier versions having been presented as lectures at Princeton and Yale in March and May of that year. It lent its title to a symposium at the joint session of the Aristotelian Society and the Mind Association at Edinburgh, July 1951, along with the animadversions of the symposiasts, in the Aristotelian Society’s supplementary volume for 1951.)Google Scholar
Quine, W. V 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V 1967. Accompanying note on Whitehead and Russell on Incomplete Symbols. In van Heijenoort (1967: 216–17).
Quine, W. V. 1969. Epistemology naturalized. In Ontological Relativity, and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press, 69–90.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 2008. Naturalism; or, living within one’s means. In Føllesdal, D. and Quine, D. B. (eds.) Confessions of a Confirmed Extensionalist and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 461–72; reprinted from Dialectica 49 (1995): 251–61.Google Scholar
Ramsey, F. P. 1950. The Foundations of Mathematics and other Logical Essays. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reck, Erich. 2003. Dedekind’s structuralism: an interpretation and partial defense. Synthese 137: 369–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reck, Erich. 2011. Dedekind’s contributions to the foundations of mathematics. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N. (fall 2011 edn). Available at:.Google Scholar
Reck, Erich and Price, Michael. 2000. Structures and structuralism in contemporary philosophy of mathematics. Synthese 125: 341–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resnik, Michael. 1981. Mathematics as a science of patterns: ontology and reference. Noûs 15: 529–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resnik, Michael. 1988. Mathematics from the structural point of view. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 42: 400–24.Google Scholar
Robinson, Abraham. 1966. Non-Standard Analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Ronan, Mark. 2006. Symmetry and the Monster: One of the Greatest Quests in Mathematics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosen, Joe. 1998. Symmetry Discovered: Concepts and Applications in Nature and Science. Minneola, NY: Dover; first edn 1975. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Edward. 2010. ‘Before Pythagoras’ at New York University. New York Times, 26 November.
Russell, Bertrand. 1900. A Critical Exposition of the Philosophy of Leibniz. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1903. The Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1905. On denoting. Mind new series 14: 479–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1912. The Problems of Philosophy. London: Williams and Norgate; The Home University Library of Modern Knowledge.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1917. The relation of sense data to physics. In Russell, Bertrand, Mysticism and Logic. London: Allen and Unwin, 145−79.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1924. Logical atomism. In Muirhead, J. H., Contemporary British Philosophy: Personal Statements, first series. London: Allen and Unwin, 359–84.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1967. The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell, vol. i. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Scharlau, Walter. 2008. Who is Alexander Grothendieck?Notices of the American Mathematical Society 55: 930–41.Google Scholar
Schärlig, Alain. 2001. Compter avec des cailloux: le calcul élémentaire sur l’abaque chez les anciens Grecs. Lausanne: Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes.Google Scholar
Schmandt-Besserat, Denise. 1992. Before Writing, vol. : From Counting to Cuneiform. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Sebald, W. G. 1996. The Emigrants. New York: New Directions. (Die Ausgewanderten. Frankfurt am Main: Eichborn, 1993.)Google Scholar
Serre, Jean-Pierre. 2004. Interview with Serre, J.-P., by Raussen, Martin and Skau, Christian. Notices of the American Mathematical Society 51: 210–14.
Shapiro, Stewart. 1997. Philosophy of Mathematics: Structure and Ontology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Stewart. 2000. Thinking about Mathematics: The Philosophy of Mathematics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shen, Kangsheng, Crossley, John N., and Lun, Anthony W.-C. 1999. The Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art: Companion and Commentary. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
SIAM (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics) n.d.. Website available at: .
Siegmund-Schultze, Reinhard. 2004. A non-conformist longing for unity in the fractures of modernity: towards a scientific biography of Richard von Mises. Science in Context 17: 333–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soames, Scott. 2008. No class: Russell on contextual definition and the elimination of sets. Philosophical Studies 139: 213–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, Elliott. 1993. Mathematics and indispensability. Philosophical Review, 102: 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, Ronald. 2005. Review of Aschbacher and Smith 2004. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society new series 43: 115–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Joel and Graham, Ronald. 2009. The elementary proof of the prime number theorem. The Mathematical Intelligencer 31: 18–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprague, Roland. 1939. Beispiel einer Zerlegung des Quadrats in lauter verschiedene Quadrate. Mathematische Zeitschrift 45: 607f.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Howard. 1988. Logos, logic, and Logistiké: some philosophical remarks on nineteenth-century transformation of mathematics. In Aspray and Kitcher (1988: 238–59).
Steiner, Mark. 1973. Mathematical Knowledge. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Steiner, Mark. 1998. The Applicability of Mathematics as a Philosophical Problem. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Steiner, Mark. 2009. Empirical regularities in Wittgenstein’s philosophy of mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica 17: 1−34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Ian. 2007. Why Beauty is Truth: A History of Symmetry. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Stigler, Stephen. 1980. Stigler’s law of eponymy. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 39: 147–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1950. On referring. Mind 59: 320–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tait, William. 1996. Frege versus Carnap and Dedekind: on the concept of number. In Tait, W. (ed.), Early Analytic Philosophy: Frege, Russell, Wittgenstein: Essays in Honor of Leonard Linsky. Chicago: Open Court, 213–48.Google Scholar
Tait, William. 2001. Beyond the axioms: the question of objectivity in mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica 9: 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tait, William. 2006. Review of Gödel’s correspondence on proof theory and constructive mathematics in the Collected Works. Philosophia Mathematica 14: 76–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tappenden, Jamie. 2009. Mathematical concepts and definitions. In Mancosu, Paolo (ed.) Philosophy of Mathematical Practice. Oxford University Press, 256–75.Google Scholar
Tegmark, Max. 2008. The mathematical universe. Foundations of Physics 38: 101–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, William (Lord Kelvin) and Tait, Peter Guthrie. 1867. A Treatise of Natural Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Thurston, William P. 1994. On proof and progress in mathematics. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 30: 161–177. (Anthologized in Tymoczko (1998) and Hersh (2006).)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toledo, Sue. 2011. Sue Toledo’s notes of her conversations with Gödel in 1972−5. In Kennedy, Juliette and Kossak, Roman (eds.) Set Theory, Arithmetic, and Foundations of Mathematics: Theorems, Philosophies. Cambridge University Press, 200−7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tutte, William. 1958. Originally in Martin Gardner’s ‘Mathematical Games’ column, Scientific American 199 (November): 136–44; reprinted as ‘Squaring the square’, in Martin Gardner, More Mathematical Puzzles and Diversions. London: Penguin, 1961.Google Scholar
Tymoczko, Thomas (ed.). 1998. New Directions in the Philosophy of Mathematics. An Anthology, revised and expanded edn. Princeton University Press.
Van Bendegem, J. P. 1998. What, if anything, is experiment in mathematics? In Anapolitanos, D. et al. (eds.) Philosophy and the Many Faces of Science. London: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Van Heijenoort, Jean. 1967. From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879–1931. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Voevodky, Vladimir. 2010a. Univalent foundations project. Available at: .
Voevodky, Vladimir. 2010b. What if current foundations of mathematics are inconsistent? Available at: .
Waismann, Friedrich. 1945. Verifiability. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society,supplementary vol. 19: 119–50.Google Scholar
Wang, Hao. 1961. Proving theorems by pattern recognition ii. Bell Systems Technical Journal 40: 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Heinrich. 1893. Leopold Kronecker. Mathematische Annalen 43: 1–26. Reprinted from Jahresbericht der deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 2 (1891–2): 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weil, André. 2005. A 1940 letter of André Weil on analogy in mathematics, trans. Krieger, Martin. Notices of the American Mathematical Society 52: 334–41. Original in Weil, Œuvres scientifiques: Collected Papers. New York: Springer, vol. i, 244–55.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Steven. 1997. Changing attitudes and the standard model. In Hoddeson, Lillian et al. (eds.) The Rise of the Standard Model: Particle Physics in the 1960s and 1970s. Cambridge University Press, 36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyl, Hermann. 1921. Über die neue Grundlagenkrise der Mathematik. Mathematische Zeitschrift 10: 39–79. Translation entitled ‘On the new foundational crisis in mathematics’, in Mancosu (1998: 86–118).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyl, Hermann. 1952. Symmetry. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyl, Hermann. 1987. The Continuum: A Critical Examination of the Foundation of Analysis, trans. from the German of 1918. Kirksville, MO: Thomas Jefferson University Press.Google Scholar
Weyl, Hermann. 2009. Mind and Nature: Selected Writings on Philosophy, Mathematics and Physics, ed. and intro. Pesic, Peter. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whately, Richard. 1831. Elements of Logic Comprising the Substance of the Article in the Encyclopaedia Metropolitana, fourth revised edn. London: B. Fellowes.Google Scholar
Whately, Richard. 1874. An Abstract of Bishop Whately’s Logic, to the End of chapter 3, book 2, with Examination Papers, ed. Reynolds, Bion. Cambridge: W. Tomlin.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. 1926. Mathematics as an element in the history of thought. Lecture 2 of the Lowell Lectures, 1925. In Science and the Modern World. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wigner, Eugene. 1960. The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences. Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 13: 1−14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Mark. 1992. Frege: the royal road from geometry. Noûs 26: 149–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Mark. 2000. The unreasonable uncooperativeness of mathematics in the natural sciences. The Monist 86: 296–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1922. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. Ogden, C. K.. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1956. Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, ed. von Wright, G. H., Rhees, R., and Anscombe, G. E. M., trans. Anscombe, G. E. M.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1961. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. Pears, D. F. and McGuinness, B. F.. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1969. On Certainty. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1974. Philosophical Grammar, ed. Rhees, Rush, trans. Kenny, Anthony. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1976. Wittgenstein’s Lectures on the Foundations of Mathematics, Cambridge, 1939: from the notes of R. G. Bosanquet, Norman Malcolm, Rush Rhees, and Yorick Smythies, ed. Diamond, Cora. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1978. Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics. ed. von Wright, G. H., Rhees, R., and Anscombe, G. E. M., trans. Anscombe, G. E. M., third revised edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1979. Wittgenstein’s Lectures, Cambridge 1932–1935, ed. Ambrose, Alice. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2001. Philosophical Investigations, trans. Anscombe, G. E. M., third revised edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Worrall, John. 1989. Structural realism: the best of both worlds?Dialectica 43: 99–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Crispin. 1983. Frege’s Conception of Numbers as Objects. Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
Wronski, J. Hoëné de. 1811. Introduction à la philosophie des mathématiques et technie d’algorithmie. Paris: Courcier.Google Scholar
Wylie, Alexander. 1853. Jottings on the Sciences of the Chinese. Shanghai: Northern Herald.Google Scholar
Yablo, Stephen. 1998. Does ontology rest upon a mistake?Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supplement 72: 229–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeilberger, Doron. n.d. Opinions. Available at: .

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Ian Hacking, University of Toronto
  • Book: Why Is There Philosophy of Mathematics At All?
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107279346.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Ian Hacking, University of Toronto
  • Book: Why Is There Philosophy of Mathematics At All?
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107279346.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Ian Hacking, University of Toronto
  • Book: Why Is There Philosophy of Mathematics At All?
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107279346.010
Available formats
×