Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T13:31:35.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Analysing the workplace and user requirements: challenges for the development of methods for requirements engineering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2010

Paul Luff
Affiliation:
King's College London
Jon Hindmarsh
Affiliation:
King's College London
Christian Heath
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This chapter discusses the relationship between workplace studies and requirements engineering for computer systems, focusing primarily on user requirements. Superficially, the two activities have much in common. Though an exact definition of the term ‘requirements engineering’ is still to be agreed upon, various perspectives reveal that requirements engineers must understand a domain well enough to determine requirements for computer systems intended for use in that setting. For example, Davis (1993) proposes that requirements engineering is the analysis, documentation and ongoing evolution of both user needs and the external behaviour of the system to be built; Loucopoulos and Karakostas (1995: vii) suggest that ‘requirements engineering deals with activities which attempt to understand the exact needs of the users of a software intensive system and to translate such needs into precise and unambiguous statements which will subsequently be used in the development of the system’. Determining the needs of users will necessarily involve understanding the activities certain users are performing in order to accomplish their work, most particularly as the new technology might be intended to replace, transform or support existing work practices. Indeed, further definitions have sought to make such a perspective explicit in order to focus the debate on both social and technical concerns in requirements. Thus, Goguen (1994: 1) states that ‘requirements are properties that a system should have in order to succeed in the environment in which it will be used’.

Type
Chapter
Information
Workplace Studies
Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design
, pp. 242 - 251
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×