Ayala, F.J. 2009. Darwin and the scientific method. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106 (Suppl. 1): 10033–10039.Google Scholar

Campiche, S., Becker-van Slooten, K., Ridreau, C., & Tarradellas, J. 2006. Effects of insect growth regulators on the nontarget soil arthropod Folsomia candida (Collembola). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 63: 216–225.Google Scholar

Darwin, F. 1903. More Letters of Charles Darwin. Murray, London.Google Scholar

Gastel, B. & Day, R.A. 2016. How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper, 8th ed. Greenwood Press, Westport, CT.Google Scholar

Gopen, G. & Swan, J. 1990. The science of scientific writing. American Scientist 78: 550–558. [Official version online at www.americanscientist.org/issues/feature/the-science-of-scientific-writing/1], accessed 20 June 2016.Google Scholar

Halliday, M.A.K. & Martin, J. R. 1993. Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar

Hannam, S. & Rutowski, R. n.d. The peppered moth: A seasoned survivor. https://askabiologist.asu.edu/why-vs-how-biology, accessed 1 June 2016.Google Scholar

Hyland, K. 1998. Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Hyland, K. 2004. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Lemke, J.L. 1990. Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values. Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ.Google Scholar

Lobban, C.S., Schefter, M., Camacho, F.A., & Jocson, J. 2014. Tropical Pacific Island Environments, 2nd ed. Bess Press, Honolulu, HI.Google Scholar

Love, A. 1996. How do we explain explanation? An examination of the concept of “explanation” in relation to the communication needs of science undergraduates. In Hewings, M. & Dudley-Evans, T. (eds.), Evaluation and Course Design in EAP. Prentice Hall-Macmillan in association with the British Council, Hemel Hempstead, pp. 151–165.Google Scholar

Mayr, E. 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Palacios-Vargas, J.G., Castaño-Meneses, G., Gómez-Anaya, J.A., Martínez-Yrizar, A., Mejía-Recamia, B.E., & Martínez-Sanchez, J. 2007. Litter and soil arthropods diversity and density in a tropical dry forest ecosystem in Western Mexico. Biodiversity and Conservation 16: 3703–3717.Google Scholar

Paul, R. & Elder, L. n.d. Elements and standards learning tool. www.criticalthinking.org/pages/elements-and-standards-learning-tool/783, accessed 23 December 2012.Google Scholar

Roig, M. 2015. Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: A guide to ethical writing. US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Research Integrity. http://ori.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/plagiarism.pdf, accessed 21 September 2016.Google Scholar

Romero, L.M. & Wikelski, M. 2010. Stress physiology as a predictor of survival in Galàpagos marine iguanas. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 277: 3157–3162.Google Scholar

Schefter, M. 1996. Student reactions to tentative language (hedging) in genres of environmental science writing. PhD Dissertation, The Union Institute, Cincinnati, OH.Google Scholar

Swales, J.M. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Swales, J.M. 2004. Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Thierry, B. 2005. Integrating proximate and ultimate causation: Just one more go! Current Science 89: 1180–1183.Google Scholar

Woodford, F.P. (ed.) 1968. Scientific Writing for Graduate Students. Council of Biology Editors, Bethesda, MD.Google Scholar