Introduction

When focusing on concepts such as youth, participation and local policies in Italy, some key aspects need to be underlined in order to provide a common conceptual framework.

The first aspect relates to the problem of defining youth and the related expressions of ‘youth policies’ and ‘youth participation’. Italian literature has recently adopted the term young adult to denote people between the ages of 30 and 34; nevertheless a young adult can be female, male, student, professional, unemployed, single, married, a parent, live with parents and so forth. At policy level the intrinsic differentiation characterising ‘planet youth’ is still based on the traditional distinction among ‘children’, ‘adolescents’ and ‘youth’, that implies both different disciplines and different professional skills and policy fields.

The second aspect is related to the structure of the Italian welfare system, characterised since the very beginning of the republican period through two core interrelated features that influence the entire policy scenario: the breadwinner model, on the one side, and on the other side the weak stateness of the social protection regime, traditionally centred on the individual-family couple (Sgritta, 2005b). According to Saraceno and Keck (2010), familism relies on a permanent trust on the family, on its intergenerational solidarity and on its gender structure as provider of work and assistance. This model makes the social chances of mobility and autonomy of young people dependant on the labour market position of the breadwinner, the social status of enlarged family and the socioeconomic context of birth and life.

The third aspect refers to territorial dimension and consequential policy scaling. In Italy there is a high percentage of towns with less than 5,000 inhabitants, representing about 70% out of 8,000 urban areas and home to approximately 17% of the total population. It has to be stressed that in referring to this territorial dimension, young people's conditions concern mainly but not only cities (in Italy about 45% of the population lives in highly urbanised towns). Beyond the traditional north–south educational, labour market and social participation divide, ongoing factors of differentiation affecting urban/rural, industrial/agricultural, mountain/coast dimensions confirm the importance of socioeconomic context and ‘local societies’.