Element contents
Heidegger's Concept of Science
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 November 2024
Summary
This Element argues that Heidegger's concept of science has two core features. Heidegger critiques a security-oriented concept of science, which he associates with the dominance of physics in modern science and metaphysics and with a progressive resistance among philosophers and scientists to ontological questioning. Meanwhile, Heidegger advances an access-oriented concept of science, on which science is essentially founded on ontological disclosures but also constantly open to the possibility of new revolutionary disclosures. This Element discusses how these commitments develop in Heidegger's early and later thinking, and argues that they inform his views on the history of Western metaphysics and on the possibilities for human flourishing that modernity, and modern science specifically, affords. The Element also discusses Heidegger's dialogue with Werner Heisenberg about quantum physics; and throughout, it highlights points of contact and divergence between Heidegger and other philosophers of science such as Karl Popper, Thomas Kuhn, Paul Feyerabend, and Helen Longino.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009523523Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 12 December 2024
References
Aquinas, Thomas. 1975. Summa Contra Gentiles, Book One: God. Trans. Anton C. Pegis. (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. Ed. Barnes, Jonathan. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press). One-volume digital edition.Google Scholar
Augustine, . 1995. Against the Academicians and the Teacher. Trans. Peter King. (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett).Google Scholar
Augustine, . 2014. Confessions: Books 1–8. Trans. and ed. Carolyn, J.-B. Hammond. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Augustine, . 2016. Confessions: Books 9–13. Trans. and ed. Hammond, Carolyn J.-B.. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. 2003. The New Organon. Ed. Jardine, Lisa and Silverthorne, Michael. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Beck, Adam. 2002. Heidegger and Science: Nature, Objectivity and the Present-at-Hand. (London: Middlesex University). PhD thesis. Awarded May 2002.Google Scholar
Beck, Adam. 2005. “Heidegger and Relativity Theory: Crisis, Authenticity, and Repetition.” Angelaki 10(1). 163–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blattner, William. 1995. “Decontextualization, Standardization, and Deweyan Science.” Man and World 28(4). 321–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blattner, William. 1999. Heidegger’s Temporal Idealism. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bokulich, Alisa. 2008. Re-examining the Classical-Quantum Relation: Beyond Reductionism and Pluralism. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, Robert. 1983. “Heidegger’s Categories in Being and Time.” The Monist 66(3). 387–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caputo, John D. 2012. “Heidegger’s Philosophy of Science: The Two Essences of Science.” In Heidegger on Science, pp. 261–79. Ed. Glazebrook, Trish. (Albany: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
Carman, Taylor. 2005. “Authenticity.” In A Companion to Heidegger, pp. 285–96. Ed. Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Wrathall, Mark A.. (Malden, MA: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Carman, Taylor. 2007. “Heidegger on Correspondence and Correctness.” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 28. 103–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carman, Taylor. 2019. “Quantum Theory as Technology.” In Heidegger on Technology, pp. 299–313. Ed. Wendland, Aaron James, Merwin, Christopher, and Hadjioannou, Christos. (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Carroll, Sean. 2019a. “Even Physicists Don’t Understand Quantum Mechanics.” The New York Times. September 7, 2019: www.nytimes.com/2019/09/07/opinion/sunday/quantum-physics.html.Google Scholar
Carson, Cathryn. 2010a. “Science as Instrumental Reason: Heidegger, Habermas, Heisenberg.” Continental Philosophy Review 42. 483–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, Cathryn. 2010b. Heisenberg in the Atomic Age: Science and the Public Sphere. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 2015. “Hermann Cohen and the Renewal of Kantian Philosophy.” Trans. Lydia Patton. In The Neo-Kantian Reader, pp. 221–35. Ed. Luft, Sebastian. (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Chevalley, Catherine. 1992. “Heidegger and the Physical Sciences.” In Martin Heidegger: Critical Assessments Volume IV: Reverberations, pp. 342–64. Ed. Macann, Christopher. (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Clark, Andy. 1999. Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Clarke, Leonard W. 1962. “Greek Astronomy and Its Debt to the Babylonians.” The British Journal for the History of Science 1. 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crease, Robert P. 2012. “Heidegger and the Empirical Turn in Continental Philosophy of Science.” In Heidegger on Science, pp. 225–37. Ed. Glazebrook, Trish. (Albany: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
Crowell, Steven Galt. 1997. “Philosophy as a Vocation: Heidegger and University Reform in the Early Interwar Years.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 14. 255–76.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel O. 1995. “Heidegger’s Concept of Temporality: Reflections on a Recent Criticism.” The Review of Metaphysics 49. 95–115.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel O. 2001. Heidegger’s Concept of Truth. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel O. 2005. “Heidegger and German Idealism.” In A Companion to Heidegger, pp. 65–79. Ed. Dreyfus, Hubert L and Wrathall, Mark A.. (Malden, MA: Blackwell).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descartes, René. 1983. Principles of Philosophy. Trans. Valentine Rodger Miller and Reese P. Miller. (Dordrecht: D. Reidel).Google Scholar
Descartes, René. 1985. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Vol. 1. Trans. John Cottingham John Stoothoff and Dugald Murdoch. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Descartes, René. 1998. Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy. Trans. Donald A. Cress. (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett). 4th edition.Google Scholar
Dilthey, Wilhelm. 1977. Descriptive Psychology and Historical Understanding. Trans. Richard. M. Zaner and Kenneth L. Heiges. (The Hague: Martinus Nijhof).Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L. 1991. Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L. 2004. “What Could Be More Intelligible than Everyday Intelligibility? Reinterpreting Division I of Being and Time in the Light of Division II.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 24. 265–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupré, John. 1988. “Materialism, Physicalism, and Scientism.” Philosophical Topics 16. 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedoroff, Nina V. 2012. “McClintock’s Challenge in the 21st Century.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109. 20200–3.Google ScholarPubMed
Glanzberg, Michael. 2021. “Truth.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. Zalta, Edward N.. Summer 2021 Edition: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/truth/.Google Scholar
Glazebrook, Trish. 2000. Heidegger’s Philosophy of Science. (New York: Fordham University Press).Google Scholar
Goldberg, Paul. 2021. “Two Refutations of the Vorhanden Reading of Heidegger’s Philosophy of Science in Being and Time.” Heidegger Circle Proceedings 55. 174–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golob, Sacha. 2013. “Heidegger on Assertion, Method and Metaphysics.” European Journal of Philosophy 23(4). 878–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guignon, Charles B. 1983. Heidegger and the Problem of Knowledge. (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett).Google Scholar
Guignon, Charles B. 1993. “Authenticity, Moral Values, and Psychotherapy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger, pp. 215–39. Ed. Guignon, Charles B.. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, Norwood Russell. 1958. Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science. (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Haugeland, John. 2013. Dasein Disclosed: John Haugeland’s Heidegger. Ed. Rouse, Joseph. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heelan, Patrick A. 1995. “Heidegger’s Longest Day: Twenty-Five Years Later.” In From Phenomenology to Thought, Errancy, and Desire: Essays in Honor of William J. Richardson, S.J., pp. 579–87. Ed. Babich, Babette E.. (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. See “Texts and Method of Citation” above.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Werner. 1958a. “The Representation of Nature in Contemporary Physics.” Daedalus 87. 95–108.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Werner. 1958b. Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science. (London: George Allen & Unwin).Google Scholar
Hemming, Laurence Paul. 2013. Heidegger and Marx: A Productive Dialogue over the Language of Humanism. (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press).Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. 1965. Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. (New York: The Free Press).Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. 1966. Philosophy of Natural Science. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 2001. Logical Investigations, Vol. 1. Trans. J. N. Findlay. Ed. Moran, Dermot. (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Ihde, Don. 2010. Heidegger’s Technologies: Postphenomenological Perspectives. (New York: Fordham University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Käufer, Stephan. 2021. “Authenticity (Eigentlichkeit).” In The Cambridge Heidegger Lexicon, pp. 71–77. Ed. Wrathall, Mark A.. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1983. A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock. (San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman).Google Scholar
Kessel, Thomas. 2011. Phänomenologie des Lebendigen: Heideggers Kritik an den Leitbegriffen der neuzeitlichen Biologie. (Freiburg im Breisgau: Karl Alber).Google Scholar
Kisiel, Theodore. 1977. “Heidegger and the New Images of Science.” Research in Phenomenology 7(1). 162–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisiel, Theodore and Sheehan, Thomas (eds.). 2007. Becoming Heidegger: On the Trail of His Early Occasional Writings, 1910–1927. (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press).Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. 2011. Science in a Democratic Society. (Amherst, NY: Prometheus).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochan, Jeff. 2017. Science as Social Existence: Heidegger and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. (Cambridge: Open Book).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kockelmans, Joseph J. 1985. Heidegger and Science. (Washington, DC: Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology and University Press of America).Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 2012. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press). 4th edition.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafont, Cristina. 2000. Heidegger, Language, and World-Disclosure. Trans. Graham Harman. (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imre. 1970. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.” In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, pp. 91–196. Ed. Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan. (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno and Steve, Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).Google Scholar
Laughlin, R. B. and Pines, David. 2000. “The Theory of Everything.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97(1). 28–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Longino, Helen E. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Research. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lotze, Rudolf Hermann. 2015. “The World of Ideas,” from Logic. Trans. Bernard Bosanquet. In The Neo- Kantian Reader, pp. 82–92. Ed. Luft, Sebastian. (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Lin, Ma and van Brakel, Jaap. 2014. “Heidegger’s Thinking on the ‘Same’ of Science and Technology.” Continental Philosophy Review 47. 19–43.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 2007. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. (Notre Dame, IN: The University of Notre Dame Press). 3rd edition.Google Scholar
Maimonides, Moses. 1910. The Guide for the Perplexed. Trans. Michael Friedländer. (New York: E.P. Dutton). 2nd edition.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1976. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy: Volume I. Trans. Ben Fowkes. (London: Penguin).Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1978. “Estranged Labour.” In The Marx-Engels Reader, pp. 70–81. Ed. Tucker, Robert C.. (New York: Norton).Google Scholar
McManus, Denis. 2012. Heidegger and the Measure of Truth. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, Denis. 2019. “On a Judgment of One’s Own: Heideggerian Authenticity, Standpoints, and All Things Considered.” Mind 128. 1181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, William. 1999. The Glance of the Eye: Heidegger, Aristotle, and the Ends of Theory. (Albany: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
Mitchell, Andrew. 2019. “The Question Concerning the Machine: Heidegger’s Technology Notebooks in the 1940s-1950s.” In Heidegger on Technology, pp. 115–32. Ed. Wendland, Aaron James, Merwin, Christopher, and Hadjioannou, Christos. (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Natorp, Paul. 2015a. “Kant and the Marburg School.” Trans. Frances Bottenberg. In The Neo-Kantian Reader, pp. 180–97. Ed. Luft, Sebastian. (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Natorp, Paul. 2015b. “The Problem of a Logic of the Exact Sciences.” Trans. Frances Bottenberg. In The Neo-Kantian Reader, pp. 198–213. Ed. Luft, Sebastian. (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1969. On the Genealogy of Morals and Ecce Homo. Trans. Walter Kaufmann and Hollingdale, R. J.. (New York: Vintage).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1974. The Gay Science: With a Prelude in Rhymes and an Appendix of Songs. Trans. Walter Kaufmann. (New York: Vintage).Google Scholar
Plato, . 1997. Plato: Complete Works. Ed. Cooper, John M.. (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett).Google Scholar
Pöggeler, Otto. 1993. “The Hermeneutics of the Technological World: The Heidegger – Heisenberg Dispute.” Trans. Kane, Michael and Pfefferkorn-Forbath, Kristin. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 1. 21–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1983. “Ontology and Ideology Revisited.” The Journal of Philosophy 80. 499–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. 2004. Quintessence: Basic Readings from the Philosophy of W. V. Quine. Ed. Gibson, Roger F. Jr. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans. 1938. Experience and Prediction: An Analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge. (Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Richardson, William J. 1968. “Heidegger’s Critique of Science.” The New Scholasticism 42. 511–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouse, Joseph. 1985a. “Science and the Theoretical ‘Discovery’ of the Present-at-Hand.” In Descriptions, pp. 200–210. Ed. Ihde, Don and Silverman, Hugh J.. (Albany: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
Rouse, Joseph. 1985b. “Heidegger’s Later Philosophy of Science.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 23(1). 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouse, Joseph. 1987. Knowledge and Power: Toward a Political Philosophy of Science. (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Rouse, Joseph. 2005. “Heidegger’s Philosophy of Science.” In A Companion to Heidegger, pp. 173–89. Ed. Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Wrathall, Mark A.. (Malden, MA: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 2007. Existentialism Is a Humanism. Trans. Carol Macomber. Ed. Kulka, John. (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Seigfried, Hans. 1978. “Heidegger’s Longest Day: Being and Time and the Sciences.” Philosophy Today 22. 319–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seigfried, Hans. 1990. “Autonomy and Quantum Physics: Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Heisenberg.” Philosophy of Science 57. 619–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheehan, Thomas. Unpublished Manuscript. “How Not to Translate Heidegger – 2: Dasein.” Downloaded January 26, 2024. Available for download at: www.academia.edu/43179070/how_not_to_translate_heidegger_2_dasein_.Google Scholar
Singham, Mano. 2021. “When Lord Kelvin Nearly Killed Darwin’s Theory.” Scientific American, September 5, 2021: www.scientificamerican.com/article/when-lord-kelvin-nearly-killed-darwins-theory1/.Google Scholar
Sluga, Hans. 2005. “Heidegger’s Nietzsche.” In A Companion to Heidegger, pp. 102–20. Ed. Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Wrathall, Mark A.. (Malden, MA: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Smith, William H. 2007. “Why Tugendhat’s Critique of Heidegger’s Concept of Truth Remains a Critical Problem.” Inquiry 50. 156–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Iain. 2005. Heidegger on Ontotheology: Technology and the Politics of Education. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Iain. 2011. Heidegger, Art, and Postmodernity. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tugendhat, Ernst. 1994. “Heidegger’s Idea of Truth.” In Hermeneutics and Truth, pp. 83–97. Ed. Wachterhauser, Brice R.. (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press).Google Scholar
van Fraassen, Bas C. 1980. The Scientific Image. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, James R. 2012. “Beyond Ontic-Ontological Relations: Gelassenheit, Gegnet, and Niels Bohr’s Program of Experimental Quantum Mechanics.” In Heidegger on Science, pp. 47–65. Ed. Glazebrook, Trish. (Albany: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 2004. The Vocation Lectures. Trans. Rodney Livingstone. Ed. Owen, David and Strong, Tracy B.. (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett).Google Scholar
Wendland, Aaron James. 2019. “Heidegger vs. Kuhn: Does Science Think?” In Heidegger on Technology, pp. 282–98. Ed.Wendland, Aaron James, Merwin, Christopher, and Hadjioannou, Christos. (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Withy, Katherine. 2015. Heidegger on Being Uncanny. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1981. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Trans. C. K. Ogden. (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Wrathall, Mark A. 1999. “Heidegger and Truth as Correspondence.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 7. 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrathall, Mark A. 2011. Heidegger and Unconcealment: Truth, Language, and History. (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by