Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T15:44:31.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in the Problems of God

The Problem of God in David Hume

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 November 2023

Anders Kraal
Anders Kraal
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver

Summary

David Hume (1711-1776) is one of the foremost critics of attempts to provide rational arguments in support of traditional Christian theism in Western philosophy. In this Element, the authors examine Hume's chief objections to the cosmological argument, the design argument, and the argument from miracles, along with some main responses to these objections. The authors also examine Hume's seminal version of the argument from evil, which is deployed in an effort to show that traditional Christian theism is lacking in coherent meaning. Drawing on recent developments in Hume scholarship according to which Hume's ultimate philosophical aim was to further an anti-Christian agenda, an attempt is made to situate Hume's writings on God and religion in an unfolding narrative that is impacted throughout by the trenchant religious criticisms of Hume's chief philosophical predecessor, Thomas Hobbes.
Get access

Keywords

David Humecosmological argumentsdesign argumentsarguments from miraclesproblem of evil
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in the Problems of God
Online ISBN: 9781009270243
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 18 January 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, A., & O’Brien, D. 2014. Hume’s Critique of Religion: “Sick Men’s Dreams.” Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beauchamp, T., ed. 2000. David Hume: An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, T., ed. 2009. David Hume: An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berman, D. 1983. “Enlightenment and Counter-Enlightenment in Irish Philosophy.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 65, 148–165.Google Scholar
Boston, T. 1841. Human Nature in Its Fourfold State. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Bourget, D., & Chalmers, D. 2014. “What Do Philosophers Believe?” Philosophical Studies 170, 465–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, R. 1772. Works, vol. 5. London: J. and F. Rivington.Google Scholar
Burleigh, J. H. S. 1960. A Church History of Scotland. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burns, R. M. 1981. The Great Debate on Miracles: From Joseph Glanvill to David Hume. London: Associated University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, George. 1762. A Dissertation on Miracles. London: A. Kincaid & J. Bell.Google Scholar
Clarke, S. 1705. A Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God. London: Will. Botham.Google Scholar
Clarke, S. 1706. A Discourse Concerning the Unchangeable Obligations of Natural Religion, and the Truth and Certainty of the Christian Revelations. London: Will. Botham.Google Scholar
Condren, C. 2000. Thomas Hobbes. New York: Twayne Publishers.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. 1984. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 2. Eds. Cottingham, J., Stoofhoff, R., & Murdoch, D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. 1985. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 1. Eds. Cottingham, J., Stoofhoff, R., & Murdoch, D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, B. 2006. The Reality of God and the Problem of Evil. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Earman, D. 2000. Hume’s Abject Failure: The Argument against Miracles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flew, A. 1961. Hume’s Philosophy of Belief. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fogelin, R. 1985. Hume’s Skepticism in the Treatise of Human Nature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fogelin, R. 2005. A Defense of Hume on Miracles. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Foster, S. 1997. Melancholy Duty: The Hume-Gibbon Attack on Christianity. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaskin, J. C. A. 1988. Hume’s Philosophy of Religion. London: Macmillian.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaskin, J. C. A. 2009. “Hume on Religion.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hume. Edited by Norton, D., & Taylor, J., 480–513. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, H. G. 1901. The Social Life of Scotland in the Eighteenth Century. London: Adam & Charles Black.Google Scholar
Greig, J. Y. T., ed. 1932. The Letters of David Hume, 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hendel, Charles. 1963. Studies in the Philosophy of David Hume. New York: Bobbs Merrill.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. 1998. Leviathan. Edited by Gaskin, J. C. A. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1739. A Treatise of Human Nature. London: John Noon.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1740. An Abstract of a Book Lately Published Entitled A Treatise of Human Nature. London: C. Borbet.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1748. Philosophical Essays Concerning Human Understanding. London: A. Millar.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1751. Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals. London: A. Millar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, D. 1757. Four Dissertations. London: A. Millar.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1967. A Letter from a Gentleman to His Friend in Edinburgh. Edited by Mossner, E. C., & Price, J. V. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1779. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. 1999. Hume, Holism, and Miracles. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Larmer, R. A. 2014. The Legitimacy of Miracle. Plymouth: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. S. 1947. Miracles: A Preliminary Study. London: Centenary Press.Google Scholar
Martinich, A. P. 2005. Hobbes. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hurlbutt, R. 1965. Hume, Newton, and the Design Argument. Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Jeffner, A. 1966. Butler and Hume on Religion. Stockholm: Diakonistyrelsen.Google Scholar
Kemp Smith, N., ed. 1935. Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kemp Smith, N., ed. 1947. Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Edinburgh: Thomas Nelson.Google Scholar
Kemp Smith, N. 2005. The Philosophy of David Hume. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
King, W. 1709. Divine Predestination and Foreknowledge. London: J. Baker.Google Scholar
Klibansky, R., & Mossner, E., eds. 1954. New Letters of David Hume. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kraal, A. 2013a. “Philo’s Argument from Evil in Hume’s Dialogues X: A Semantic Interpretation.” Sophia 52, 573–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraal, A. 2013b. “Anglicanism, Scottish Presbyterianism, and the Irreligious Aim of Hume’s Treatise.” Hume Studies 39, 169–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraal, A., & Russell, P. 2021. “Hume on Religion.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 Ed.). Edited by Zalta, E. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/hume-religion/.Google Scholar
Leith, J., ed. 1973. Creeds of the Churches. Richmond, Virginia: John Knox Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J. 1706. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. London: Awnsham and John Churchill.Google Scholar
Locke, J. 1743. A Short Discourse on Miracles. London: Robert Foulis.Google Scholar
McPherson, T. 1972. The Argument from Design. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mossner, E. 1948. “Hume’s Early Memoranda, 1729–1740: The Complete Text.” Journal of the History of Ideas 9, 492–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mossner, E. 1980. The Life of David Hume. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mossner, E., & Ross, I., eds. 1977. The Correspondence of Adam Smith. New York: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Noxon, J. 1976. “Hume’s Concern with Religion.” The Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 7, 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, N. 1963. “Hume on Evil.” The Philosophical Review 72, 180–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, W. 1975. The Cosmological Argument. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, P. 2008. The Riddle of Hume’s Treatise: Skepticism, Naturalism, and Irreligion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, P. 2021. Recasting Hume and Early Modern Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryken, P. 1995. Thomas Boston as Preacher of the Fourfold State. Exeter: Paternoster Press.Google Scholar
Schaff, P., ed. 1877. The Creeds of Christendom, vol. 3. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Scott, G., & Pottle, F., eds. 1931. Private Papers of James Boswell, vol. 12, 227–232. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sher, R. 1985. Church and University in the Scottish Enlightenment: The Moderate Literati of Edinburgh. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sher, R. 1990. “Professors of Virtue: The Social History of the Edinburgh Moral Philosophy Chair in the Eighteenth Century.” In Studies in the Philosophy of the Scottish Enlightenment. Edited by Stewart, M. A., 87–126. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, M. A. 1985. “Hume and the ‘Metaphysical Argument A Priori’.” In Philosophy, Its History, and Historiography. Edited by Holland, A. J., 243–270. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, M. A. 1995. The Kirk and the Infidel. Lancaster: Lancaster University Publications.Google Scholar
Swinburne, R. 1963. “The Argument from Design.” Philosophy 43, 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinburne, R. 1991. The Existence of God. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tweyman, S., ed. 1996. Hume on Miracles. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Yandell, K. 1990. Hume’s Inexplicable Mystery: His Views on Religion. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Problem of God in David Hume
  • Anders Kraal, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
  • Online ISBN: 9781009270243
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Problem of God in David Hume
  • Anders Kraal, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
  • Online ISBN: 9781009270243
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Problem of God in David Hume
  • Anders Kraal, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
  • Online ISBN: 9781009270243
Available formats
×