Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T07:14:38.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Whose 'Eyes on the Street' Control Crime?

Expanding Place Management into Neighborhoods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2021

Shannon J. Linning
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University, British Columbia
John E. Eck
Affiliation:
University of Cincinnati

Summary

Jane Jacobs coined the phrase 'eyes on the street' to depict those who maintain order in cities. Most criminologists assume these eyes belong to residents. In this Element we show that most of the eyes she described belonged to shopkeepers and property owners. They, along with governments, wield immense power through property ownership and regulation. From her work, we propose a Neo-Jacobian perspective to reframe how crime is connected to neighborhood function through deliberate decision-making at places. It advances three major turning points for criminology. This includes turns from: 1. residents to place managers as the primary source of informal social control; 2. ecological processes to outsiders' deliberate actions that create crime opportunities; and 3. a top-down macro- to bottom-up micro-spatial explanation of crime patterns. This perspective demonstrates the need for criminology to integrate further into economics, political science, urban planning, and history to improve crime control policies.
Get access
Type
Element
Information
Online ISBN: 9781108954143
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 02 December 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aalbers, M.B. (2006). “When the banks withdraw, slum lords take over”: The structuration of neighborhood decline through redlining, drug dealing, speculation and immigrant exploitation. Urban Studies, 43(7), 1061–86.Google Scholar
Aaronson, D., Hartley, D., & Mazumder, B. (2017). The effects of the 1930s HOLC “redlining” maps. Chicago, IL: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.Google Scholar
Abrams, C. (1955). Forbidden neighbors: A study in prejudice in housing. Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press.Google Scholar
Adams, D. & Hastings, E.M. (2001). Urban renewal in Hong Kong: Transition from development corporation to renewal authority. Land Use Policy, 18, 245–58.Google Scholar
Anaheim Police Department. (2007). The Boogie! A nightclub that defied traditional problem solving efforts. Finalist for 1995 Goldstein Award for Excellence in Problem-Oriented Policing. https://popcenter.asu.edu/sites/default/files/library/awards/goldstein/2007/07-01(F).pdfGoogle Scholar
Antero, P. (2010). Not in my neighborhood: How bigotry shaped a great American city. Chicago, IL: Ivan R. Dee Publishers.Google Scholar
Borrion, H. & Koch, D. (2019). Architecture. In Wortley, R., Sidebottom, A., Tilley, N., & Laycock, G. (eds.), Routledge handbook of crime science (pp. 145–66). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bowers, K. (2014). Risky facilities: Crime radiators or crime absorbers? A comparison of internal and external levels of theft. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30(3), 389414.Google Scholar
Bowers, K. & Johnson, S.D. (2017). Burglary prevention in practice. In Tilley, N. & Sidebottom, A. (eds.), Handbook of crime prevention and community safety, 2nd ed. (pp. 319–53). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bowers, K.J., Johnson, S.D., Guerette, R.T., Summers, L., & Poynton, S. (2011). Spatial displacement and diffusion of benefits among geographically focused policing initiatives: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(4), 347–74.Google Scholar
Braga, A.A., Turchan, B.S., Papachristos, A.V., & Hureau, D.M. (2019). Hot spots policing and crime reduction: An update of an ongoing systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 15(3), 289311.Google Scholar
Brantingham, P.L. & Brantingham, P.J. (1995). Criminality of place. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 3(3), 526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brantingham, P.L. & Brantingham, P.J. (1993). Nodes, paths and edges: Considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13(1), 328.Google Scholar
Browning, C.R., Byron, R.A., Calder, C.A., Krivo, L.J., Kwan, M., Lee, J., & Peterson, R.D. (2010). Commercial density, residential concentration, and crime: Land use patterns and violence in neighborhood context. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47(3), 329–57.Google Scholar
Browning, C.R., Calder, C.A., Boettner, B., & Smith, A. (2017a). Ecological networks and urban crime: The structure of shared routine activity locations and neighborhood-level informal control capacity. Criminology, 55(4), 754–78.Google Scholar
Browning, C.R., Calder, C.A., Soller, B., Jackson, A.L., & Dirlam, J. (2017b). Ecological networks and neighborhood social organization. American Journal of Sociology, 122(6), 1939–88.Google Scholar
Buchanan & Warley, 245 U.S. 60 (1917).Google Scholar
Bursik, R.J. (1988). Social disorganization and theories of crime and delinquency: Problems and prospects. Criminology, 26(4), 519–51.Google Scholar
Bursik, R.J. & Grasmick, H. (1993). Neighborhoods and crime: The dimensions of effective social control. New York: Lexington.Google Scholar
Caro, R. (1974). The power broker: Robert Moses and the fall of New York. New York: Alfred A. Knopf Inc.Google Scholar
Clark, T.C. & Perlman, P.B. (1948). Prejudice and property: An historic brief against racial covenants. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, R.V. (1995). Situational crime prevention. Crime and Justice, 19, 91150.Google Scholar
Clarke, R.V. & Weisburd, D. (1994). Diffusion of crime control benefits: Observations on the reverse of displacement. Crime Prevention Studies, 2, 165–84.Google Scholar
Cohen, L.E. & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588608.Google Scholar
Coolidge, S. (2019, April 25). Berding: Council’s demands “outside the law,” but he’s working with displaced tenants. Cincinnati Enquirer. www.cincinnati.com/story/sports/soccer/fc-cincinnati/2019/04/25/berding-councils-fc-cincinnati-stadium-ultimatum/3572539002/Google Scholar
Copsey, H. (2018, February). Are city neighborhoods “beating” The Banks? Some say yes, but The Banks is a neighborhood, too. WCPO News. www.wcpo.com/news/insider/are-city-neighborhoods-beating-the-banks-some-say-yes-but-the-banks-is-a-neighborhood-tooGoogle Scholar
Couch, C., Sykes, O., & Borstinghaus, W. (2011). Thirty years of urban regeneration in Britain, Germany, and France: The importance of context and path dependency. Progress in Planning, 75, 152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cozens, P. (2008). Crime prevention through environmental design. In Wortley, R. & Mazerolle, L. (eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis, 1st ed. (pp. 153–77). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cozens, P. & Hillier, D. (2012). Revisiting Jane Jacob’s “eyes on the street” for the twenty-first century: Evidence from environmental criminology. In Hart, S. & Zahm, D. (eds.), The urban wisdom of Jane Jacobs (pp. 196214). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
de Wolfe, I. (1963, February). The death and life of great American citizens. The Architectural Review, 133(792), 90–3.Google Scholar
Demeropolis, T. (2019, February). Three retail tenants coming to Paramount Square in Walnut Hills. Cincinnati Business Courier. www.bizjournals.com/cincinnati/news/2019/02/07/exclusive-three-retail-tenants-coming-to-paramount.htmlGoogle Scholar
Dorsey v. Stuyvesant Town Corporation, 299 N.Y. 2d 541 (N.Y. App. 2d 1949).Google Scholar
Douglas, S. & Welsh, B.C. (2020). Place managers for crime prevention: The theoretical and empirical status of a neglected situational crime prevention technique. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 22, 99109.Google Scholar
Duneier, M. (1999). Sidewalk. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Eck, J.E. (2019). Race, place management, and crime. In Unnever, J.D., Gabbidon, S.L., & Chouhy, C. (eds.), Building a Black criminology: Race, theory, and crime (pp. 171206). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eck, J.E. (2018). The opportunity structure for bad place management: A theory to assist effective regulation of high crime places. In Weisburd, D. & Eck, J.E. (eds.), Unraveling the crime-place connection: New directions in theory and policy (pp. 157–87). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eck, J.E. (2014). There is nothing so theoretical as good practice: Police-researcher coproduction of place theory. In Knutsson, J. & Cockbain, E. (eds.), Applied police research: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 129–40). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eck, J.E. (1997). Do premise liability suits promote business crime prevention? In Clarke, R.V. & Felson, M. (eds.), Business and crime prevention (pp. 125–50). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Eck, J.E. (1994). Drug markets and drug places: A case-control study of the spatial structure of illicit drug dealing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland College Park.Google Scholar
Eck, J.E. & Eck, E.B. (2012). Crime place and pollution: Expanding crime reduction options through a regulatory approach. Criminology & Public Policy, 11(2), 281316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eck, J.E. & Guerette, R.T. (2012). Place-based crime prevention: Theory, evidence, and policy. In B. Welsh & D. Farrington (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Crime Prevention (pp. 354–83). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eck, J.E. & Linning, S.J. (2019). Hidden in plain sight: What criminologists should know and teach but do not. The Criminologist, 44(4), 17.Google Scholar
Eck, J.E. & Madensen, T.D. (2018). Place management. In Bruinsma, G.J.N. & Johnson, S.D. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of environmental criminology (pp. 629–63). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Board, Editorial. (2017, November 29). FC Cincinnati stadium debate insulted the people who matter – The public. WCPO. www.wcpo.com/news/opinion/editorial-fc-cincinnati-stadium-debate-insulted-the-people-who-matter-the-publicGoogle Scholar
Edmonton Police Service. (1995). The Klondiker hotel project: Hotels, crime, and problem-solving on the beat. Finalist for 1995 Goldstein Award for Excellence in Problem-Oriented Policing. https://popcenter.asu.edu/sites/default/files/library/awards/goldstein/1995/95-21(F).pdfGoogle Scholar
Felson, M. (1995). Those who discourage crime. In Eck, J.E. & Weisburd, D. (eds.), Crime and place, Vol. 4 (pp. 5366). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Underwriting Manual., FHA (1936). Underwriting manual: Underwriting and valuation procedure under Title II of the National Housing Act. Washington, DC: Federal Housing Administration.Google Scholar
Fischel, W.A. (2004). An economic history of zoning and a cure for its exclusionary effects. Urban Studies, 41(2), 317–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flint, A. (2011). Wrestling with Moses: How Jane Jacobs took on New York’s master builder and transformed the American city. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Freund, D.M. (2007). Colored property: State policy and white racial politics in suburban America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gans, H.J. (1962, February). City planning and urban realities. Culture & Civilization, 33(2), 170–5.Google Scholar
Gelfand, M.I. (1975). A nation of cities: The federal government in urban America, 1933–1965. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gerard, D.W. (2016). A look at an offender-based crime strategy. Presented at the University of Cincinnati on March 7, 2016.Google Scholar
Ghosh, S., Silveria, J., & Erickson, T. (2009). Walnut Hills: An analysis of current conditions. Structure and dynamics of human settlements. www.uc.edu/cdc/urban_database/subregional/walnut_hills_analysis.pdfGoogle Scholar
Giglierano, G.J., Overmyer, D.A., & Propas, F.L. (1988). The bicentennial guide to greater Cincinnati: A portrait of two hundred years. Cincinnati, OH: The Cincinnati Historical Society.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (2016). Community interventions. In D. Weisburd, D.P. Farrington, & C. Gill (eds.), What works in crime prevention and rehabilitation (pp. 77109). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Gill, C., Weisburd, D., Telep, C.W., Vitter, Z., & Bennett, T. (2014). Community-oriented policing to reduce crime, disorder and fear and increase satisfaction and legitimacy among citizens: A systematic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10(4), 399428.Google Scholar
Gillette, H. Jr. (1999). Assessing James Rouse’s role in American city planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(2), 151–67.Google Scholar
Glotzer, P. (2020). How the suburbs were segregated: Developers and the business of exclusionary housing, 1890–1960. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Gotham, K.F. (2002). Beyond invasion and succession: school segregation, real estate blockbusting, and the political economy of neighborhood racial transition. City & Community, 1(1), 83111.Google Scholar
Gotham, K.F. (2000). Urban space, restrictive covenants and the origins of racial residential segregation in a US city, 1900–50. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(3), 616–33.Google Scholar
Groff, E. (2015). Informal social control and crime events. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 31(1), 90106.Google Scholar
Groner, I.N. & Helfeld, D.M. (1948). Race discrimination in housing. The Yale Law Journal, 57(3), 426–58.Google Scholar
Guerette, R.T. & Bowers, K. (2009). Assessing the extent of crime displacement and diffusion of benefits: A review of situational crime prevention evaluations. Criminology, 47(4), 1331–68.Google Scholar
Harris, R. (2011). The magpie and the bee: Jane Jacobs’s magnificent obsession. In Page, M. & Minnel, T. (eds.), Reconsidering Jane Jacobs (pp. 6584). Chicago, IL: American Planning Association.Google Scholar
Harriss, C.L. (1951). History and policies of the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Helper, R. (1969). Racial policies and practices of real estate brokers. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, A.S. (2000). Housing and the democratic idea: The life and thought of Charles Abrams. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, C.D. (1983). Epilogue. In Hill, C.D. (ed.), Walnut Hills city neighborhood (The Neighborhood Studies Project of the Cincinnati Historical Society), (pp. 38–45). Cincinnati, OH: Cincinnati Historical Society.Google Scholar
Hillier, A.E. (2003). Redlining and the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation. Journal of Urban History, 29(4), 394420.Google Scholar
Hillier, B. (2004). Can streets be made safe? Urban Design International, 9(1), 3145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinkle, J.C., Weisburd, D., Telep, C.W., & Petersen, K. (2020). Problem-oriented policing for reducing crime and disorder: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 16(2). DOI: 10.1002/c12.1089Google Scholar
Hipp, J.R. (2010). Resident perceptions of crime and disorder: How much is “bias,” and how much is social environment differences? Criminology, 48(2), 475508.Google Scholar
Hipp, J.R. & Boessen, A. (2013). Egohoods as waves washing across the city: A new measure of “neighborhoods.Criminology, 51(2), 287327.Google Scholar
Hope, T. (1995). Community crime prevention. In Tonry, M. & Farrington, D.P. (eds.), Building a safer society: Strategic approaches to crime prevention (pp. 2190). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hoppenfeld, M. (1962). Review: The death and life of great American cities. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 28, 136–7.Google Scholar
Hoyt, H. (1963). The forces underlying city growth and structure. In Hoyt, H., According to Hoyt: 53 years of Homer Hoyt, 1916 to 1969 (pp. 296–305). Washington, DC: Homer Hoyt.Google Scholar
Hoyt, H. (1939). Structure and growth of residential neighborhoods in American cities. Washington, DC: Federal Housing Administration.Google Scholar
Hoyt, H. (1933). One hundred years of land values in Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hurley, D. (2006). Kenyon Barr Collection: Cincinnati Historical Society Library. Ohio Valley History, 6(1), 61–4. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/ejournals/article/320695401Google Scholar
Isaac, E., Hammer, M.G., Christenson, B.R., & Madensen, T. (2017). Place-based investigations of violent offender territories (P.I.V.O.T.). Goldstein Award Winner. https://popcenter.asu.edu/sites/default/files/17-15.pdfGoogle Scholar
Jackson, K.T. (1985). Crabgrass frontier: The suburbanization of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. (2000). The nature of economies. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. (1985). Cities and the wealth of nations: Principles of economic life. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. (1981). Can big plans solve the problem of renewal? In Zipp, S. & Storring, N. (eds.), Vital little plans: The short works of Jane Jacobs (pp. 177–88). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. (1969). The economy of cities. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. (1958). Downtown is for people. In Whyte, W.H. Jr. (ed.), The exploding metropolis (pp. 140–68). New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. (1956, June). The missing link in city redevelopment. Architectural Forum: The Magazine of Building, 104(6), 132–3.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. (1955, July). Philadelphia’s redevelopment: A progress report (First appearance in Architectural Forum). In Zipp, S. & Storring, N. (eds.), Vital little plans: The short works of Jane Jacobs (pp. 4451). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
John, M. (2020, July 27). Newly renovated condo complex in Walnut Hills once housed Black travelers during segregation. WCPO 9 Cincinnati. www.wcpo.com/news/transportation-development/move-up-cincinnati/newly-redeveloped-condo-complex-in-walnut-hills-once-housed-black-travelers-during-segregationGoogle Scholar
Jones-Correa, M. (2000). The origins and diffusion of racial restrictive covenants. Political Science Quarterly, 115(4), 541–68.Google Scholar
Kanigel, R. (2016). Eyes on the street: The life of Jane Jacobs. New York: Penguin Random House LLC.Google Scholar
Kelly, J.J. Jr. (2004). Refreshing the heart of the city: Vacant building receivership as a tool for neighborhood revitalization and community empowerment. Journal of Affordable Housing, 13(2), 210–38.Google Scholar
Kimble, J. (2007). Insuring inequality: The role of the Federal Housing Administration in the urban ghettoization of African Americans. Law & Social Inquiry, 32(2), 399434.Google Scholar
Klemek, C. (2011). The transatlantic collapse of urban renewal: Postwar urbanism from New York to Berlin. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Klemek, C. (2008). From political outsider to power broker in two “Great American Cities”: Jane Jacobs and the fall of the urban renewal order in New York and Toronto. Journal of Urban History, 34(2), 309–32.Google Scholar
Koch, R. (2008). The 80/20 principle: The secret of achieving more with less. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Konermann, A. (2017, February 10). 25,737 people lived in Kenyon-Barr when the city razed it to the ground. Cincinnati Magazine. www.cincinnatimagazine.com/citywiseblog/lost-city-kenyon-barr-queensgate/Google Scholar
Kornhauser, R.R. (1978). Social sources of delinquency: An appraisal of analytic models. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuklick, H. (1980). Chicago sociology and urban planning policy. Theory and Society, 89(6), 821–45.Google Scholar
Lee, Y., Eck, J.E., O, S., & Martinez, N.N. (2017). How concentrated is crime at places? A systematic review from 1970 to 2015. Crime Science, 6(1), 6.Google Scholar
Lee, Y., O, S., & Eck, J.E. (2021). Why your bar has crime but not mine: Resolving the land use and crime – risky facility conflict. Justice Quarterly, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2021.1903068Google Scholar
Leisch, J.P. (1993). Freeway and interchange design: A historical perspective. Transportation Research Record No. 1385; Intersection and Interchange Design (pp. 6068). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Light, J.S. (2009). The nature of cities: Ecological visions and the American urban professions, 1920–1960. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Linning, S.J. (2019). The Neo-Jacobian perspective of place and neighborhood crime: A case study of property management, redevelopment, and crime in Walnut Hills, Cincinnati, Ohio. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati.Google Scholar
Linning, S.J. & Eck, J.E. (2018). Weak intervention backfire and criminal hormesis: Why some otherwise effective crime prevention interventions can fail at low doses. The British Journal of Criminology, 58(2), 309–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google Scholar
MacChesney, N.W. (1927). The principles of real estate law: Real property, real estate documents and transactions. New York: The MacMillan Company.Google Scholar
Madensen, T.D. (2007). Bar management and crime: Toward a dynamic theory of place management and crime hotspots. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati.Google Scholar
Male, C.T. (1932). Real estate fundamentals. New York: D. Van Nostrand Company.Google Scholar
Mallach, A. (2006). Bringing buildings back: From abandoned properties to community assets. Montclair, NJ: National Housing Institute.Google Scholar
Manshel, A. (2020). Learning from Bryant Park: Revitalizing cities, towns, and public spaces. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Martinez, N.N., Lee, Y., Eck, J.E., & O, S. (2017). Ravenous wolves revisited: A systematic review of offending concentration. Crime Science, 6(1), 10.Google Scholar
Massey, D.S. & Denton, N.A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mawby, R.I. (2017). Defensible space. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.6Google Scholar
Mawby, R.I. (1977). Defensible space: A theoretical and empirical appraisal. Urban Studies, 14, 169–79.Google Scholar
Mayhew, P. (1981). Crime in public view: Surveillance and crime prevention. In Brantingham, P.J. & Brantingham, P.L. (eds.), Environmental criminology (pp. 119–43). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Mayhew, P. (1979). Defensible space: The current status of a crime prevention theory. The Howard Journal of Penology & Crime Prevention, 18, 150–9.Google Scholar
Mazerolle, L.G. & Roehl, J. (1998). Civil remedies and crime prevention: An introduction. Crime Prevention Studies, 9, 118.Google Scholar
Mazerolle, L., Roehl, J., & Kadleck, C. (1998). Controlling social disorder using civil remedies: Results from a randomized field experiment in Oakland, California. In Mazerolle, L. & Roehl, J. (eds.), Crime prevention studies, civil remedies and crime prevention, Vol. 9 (pp. 141–60). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
McMichael, S.L. & Bingham, R.F. (1923). City growth and values. Cleveland, OH: The Stanley McMichael Publishing Organization.Google Scholar
McMillen, D., Sarmiento-Barbieri, I., & Singh, R. (2019). Do more eyes on the street reduce crime? Evidence from Chicago’s safe passage program. Journal of Urban Economics, 110, 125.Google Scholar
Mehlhorn, D. (1998). A requiem for blockbusting: Law, economics, and race-based real estate speculation. Fordham Law Review, 67, 1145.Google Scholar
Merry, S.E. (1981). Defensible space undefended social factors in crime control through environmental design. Urban Affairs Review, 16(4), 397422.Google Scholar
Miller, N.G. & Markosyan, S. (2003). The academic roots and evolution of real estate appraisal. The Appraisal Journal, 71(2), 172–84.Google Scholar
Mohl, R. (2004). Stop the road: Freeway revolts in American cities. Journal of Urban History, 30(5): 674706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumford, L. (1962). “Mother Jacobs’ Home Remedies.” The New Yorker. December, p. 148.Google Scholar
Nelson, R.K., Winling, L., Marciano, R., et al. (2020). Mapping Inequality, American Panorama. Robert K. Nelson and Edward L. Ayers (eds.). https://dsl.richmond.edu/panorama/redliningGoogle Scholar
Newman, O. (1973). Defensible space: Crime prevention through urban design. New York: MacMillan Publishing.Google Scholar
O, S., Martinez, N.N., Lee, Y., & Eck, J.E. (2017). How concentrated is crime among victims? A systematic review from 1977 to 2014. Crime Science, 6(1), 9.Google Scholar
O’Flaherty, B. (2005). City economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Page, M. (2011). Introduction: More than meets the eye. In Page, M. & Mennel, T. (eds.), Reconsidering Jane Jacobs (pp. 314). Chicago, IL: American Planning Association.Google Scholar
Park, R.E. & Burgess, E.W. (1925). The city. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Payne, T.C. (2010). Does changing ownership change crime? An analysis of apartment ownership and crime in Cincinnati. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Cincinnati.Google Scholar
Pearce, D.M. (1979). Gatekeepers and homeseekers: Institutional patterns in racial steering. Social Problems, 26(3), 325–42.Google Scholar
Peiser, R.B. (1997). Real estate development and crime prevention needs. In Felson, M. & Clarke, R.V. (eds.), Business and crime prevention (pp. 231–48). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Pfohl, S. (1994). Images of deviance and social control: A sociological history. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Philpott, T.L. (1978). The slum and the ghetto: Neighborhood deterioration and middle-class reform, Chicago, 1880–1930. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Inquirer, Philadelphia (1962, October 23). Writer sees blacklist on Negro home loans. p. 42.Google Scholar
Pickett, S.H. (1968). An appraisal of the urban renewal programme in Canada. University of Toronto Law Journal, 18(3), 233–47.Google Scholar
Rabin, Y. (1989). Expulsive zoning: The inequitable legacy of Euclid. In Harr, C.M. & Kayden, J.S. (eds.), Zoning and the American dream: Promises still to keep (pp. 101–21). Chicago, IL: Planners Press, American Planning Association.Google Scholar
Ranasinghe, P. (2011). Jane Jacobs’ framing of public disorder and its relation to the “broken windows: theory. Theoretical Criminology, 16(1), 6384.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, J.H. (2015). Harm-focused policing. Ideas in Policing, #19. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.Google Scholar
Reno, J., Marcus, D., Leary, M.L., & Gist, N.E. (2000). Keeping illegal activity out of rental property: A police guide for establishing landlord training programs. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.Google Scholar
Reynald, D.M. (2009). Guardianship in action: Developing a new tool for measurement. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 11(1), 120.Google Scholar
Rodwin, L. (1961). Neighbors are needed. New York Times, p. BR10.Google Scholar
Rogers, A. (2018, June). Major projects in Walnut Hills aim to maintain neighborhood’s integrity. WLWT5 News Cincinnati. www.wlwt.com/article/major-projects-in-walnut-hills-aim-to-maintain-neighborhoods-integrity/21938640Google Scholar
Rose, C.M. & Brooks, R.W. (2016). Racial covenants and housing segregation, yesterday and today. In Brown, A. and Smith, V. (eds.), Race and Real Estate (pp. 161–76). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rothstein, R. (2017). The color of law: A forgotten history of how our government segregated America. New York: Liveright Publishing.Google Scholar
Royal Canadian Mounted Police (2002). Project metrotown: Reducing drug trafficking and related crime through multiagency cooperation and community partnerships. Finalist for 2002 Goldstein Award for Excellence in Problem-Oriented Policing. https://popcenter.asu.edu/sites/default/files/library/awards/goldstein/2002/02-46(F).pdfGoogle Scholar
Sampson, R.J. (2012). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sampson, R.J. (2002). Transcending tradition: New direction in community research, Chicago style. Criminology, 40, 213–30.Google Scholar
Sampson, R., Eck, J.E., & Dunham, J. (2010). Super controllers and crime prevention: A routine activity explanation of crime prevention success and failure. Security Journal, 23(1), 3751.Google Scholar
Sampson, R.J., Raudenbush, S.W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–24.Google Scholar
Santucci, L. (2019). How prevalent were racially restrictive covenants in 20th century Philadelphia? A new spatial data set provides answers. Discussion Paper. Philadelphia, PA: Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Satter, B. (2009). Family properties: Race, real estate, and the exploitation of Black urban Americans. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
Scanlan, A.L. (1949). Racial restrictions in real estate: Property values versus human values. Notre Dame Law Review, 24(2), 157–91.Google Scholar
Seattle Civil Rights & Labor History Project. (2020). Racial Restrictive Covenants: Neighborhood by neighborhood restrictions across King County. https://depts.washington.edu/civilr/covenants.htmGoogle Scholar
Shaw, C.R. & McKay, H.D. (1942/1969). Juvenile delinquency in urban areas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1, 68 S. Ct. 836 (1948).Google Scholar
Sherman, L.W. (1990). Police crackdowns: Initial and residual deterrence. Crime and Justice, 12, 148.Google Scholar
Sherman, L.W., Gartin, P.R., & Buerger, M.E. (1989). Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology, 27(1), 2756.Google Scholar
Siegel, C. (2016, April 21). The progressive roots of new urbanism. Public Square: A CNU Journal. www.cnu.org/publicsquare/progressive-roots-new-urbanismGoogle Scholar
Silver, C. (1997). The racial origins of zoning in American Cities. In Thomas, J.M. & Ritzdorf, M. (eds.), Urban planning and the African American community: In the shadows (pp. 2342). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Skogan, W. (1990). Disorder and decline: Crime and the spiral of decay in American neighborhoods. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Smith, M.J. & Clarke, R.V. (2012). Situational crime prevention: Classifying techniques using “good enough” theory. In Welsh, B.C. & Farrington, D.P. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of crime prevention (pp. 291–315). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, J. (1976). Clifford R. Shaw and Henry D. McKay: Chicago criminologists. The British Journal of Criminology, 16(1), 119.Google Scholar
Sobel, R. (1989). Trammell Crow, master builder: The story of America’s largest real estate empire. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Somin, I. & Getman, R.S. (2004, December). Brief of Jane Jacobs as Amica Curiae in support of petitioners regarding Kelo v. City of New London, submitted to the Supreme Court of the United States (no. 04–108). http://www.ij.org/images/pdf_folder/private_property/kelo/jacobs05.pdfGoogle Scholar
Suarez, R. (2011). Ric Burns New York documentary, Episode 7, 59–60min, Public Broadcasting Service (PBS).Google Scholar
Sugrue, T.J. (1995). Crabgrass-roots politics: Race, rights, and the reaction against Liberalism in the Urban North, 1940–1964. The Journal of American History, 82(2), 551–78.Google Scholar
Swartsell, N. (2017, November 17). What’s in Mayor Cranley’s offer to FC Cincinnati? City Beat. www.citybeat.com/news/blog/20983304/whats-in-mayor-cranleys-offer-to-fc-cincinnatiGoogle Scholar
Taylor, R.B. (2015). Community criminology: Fundamentals of spatial and temporal scaling, ecological indicators, and selectivity bias. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, R.B. & Gottfredson, S.D. (1986). Environmental design, crime, and prevention: An examination of community dynamics. Crime and Justice, 8, 387416.Google Scholar
Taylor, R.B., Gottfredson, S.D., & Brower, S. (1981). Territorial cognitions and prevention: An examination of community dynamics. Crime and Justice, 8, 387416.Google Scholar
Taylor, R.B., Koons, B.A., Kurtz, E.M., Greene, J.R., & Perkins, D.D. (1995). Street blocks with more nonresidential land use have more physical deterioration: Evidence from Baltimore and Philadelphia. Urban Affairs Review, 31(1), 120–36.Google Scholar
Teaford, J. (1990). The rough road to renaissance: Urban revitalization in America, 1940–1985. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Tillyer, M.S., Wilcox, P., & Walter, R.J. (2021). Crime generators in context: examining “place in neighborhood” propositions. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 37, 517–46.Google Scholar
Trounstine, J. (2018). Segregation by design: Local politics and inequality in American cities. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tweh, B. (2016). $10M Walnut Hills development ready to open. The Enquirer: Cincinnati. www.cincinnati.com/story/money/2016/01/15/walnut-hills-trevarren-flats/77763278/Google Scholar
Unnever, J.D. (1987). Reviewed works: The social ecology of crime. Contemporary Sociology, 16(6), 845–6.Google Scholar
Unnever, J.D., Cullen, F.T., Mathers, S.A., McClure, T.E., & Allison, M.C. (2009). Racial discrimination and Hirschi’s criminological classic: A chapter in the sociology of knowledge. Justice Quarterly, 26(3), 377409.Google Scholar
Venkatesh, S. (2001). Chicago’s pragmatic planners. Social Science History, 2, 275317.Google Scholar
Wagers, M., Sousa, W., & Kelling, G. (2017). Broken windows. In Wortley, R. & Townsley, M. (eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis, 2nd ed. (pp. 334–50). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Warerkar, T. (2018, September 14). New York’s 10 biggest property owners: See all the key players in New York’s real estate scene and to what extent they control the city’s landscape. Curbed New York. https://ny.curbed.com/2018/9/14/17860172/new-york-10-biggest-property-ownersGoogle Scholar
Weber, J. (2012). The evolving Interstate Highway System and the changing geography of the United States. Journal of Transport Geography, 25, 7086.Google Scholar
Weimer, A. & Hoyt, H. (1948). Principles of urban real estate, 2nd ed. New York: The Ronald Press Company.Google Scholar
Weimer, A. & Hoyt, H. (1939). Principles of urban real estate, 1st ed. New York: The Ronald Press Company.Google Scholar
Weingroff, R.F. (1996). Federal-aid highway act of 1956: Creating the interstate system. Public Roads, 60(1). www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/publicroads/96summer/p96su10.cfmGoogle Scholar
Weisburd, D. (2015). The law of crime concentration and the criminology of place. Criminology, 53(2), 133–57.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., Bushway, S., Lum, C., & Yang, S. M. (2004). Trajectories of crime at places: A longitudinal study of street segments in the city of Seattle. Criminology, 42(2), 283322.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., Eck, J.E., Braga, A.A., et al. (2016). Place matters: Criminology for the twenty-first century. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., Gill, C., Wooditch, A., Barritt, W., & Murphy, J. (2021a). Building collective action at crime hot spots: Findings from a randomized field experiment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 17, 161–91.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., Groff, E.R., & Yang, S.M. (2012). The criminology of place: Street segments and our understanding of the crime problem. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., White, C., Wire, S., & Wilson, D.B. (2021b). Enhancing informal social controls to reduce crime: Evidence from a study of crime hot spots. Prevention Science, 22(4), 509–22.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., Wyckoff, L.A., Ready, J., et al. (2006). Does crime just move around the corner? A controlled study of spatial displacement and diffusion of crime control benefits. Criminology, 44(3), 549–91.Google Scholar
Whittemore, A.H. (2012). How the Federal government zoned America: The Federal housing administration and zoning. Journal of Urban History, 39(4), 620–42.Google Scholar
Wilcox, P., Cullen, F.T., & Feldmeyer, B. (2018). Communities and crime: An enduring American challenge. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Wilcox, P. & Eck, J.E. (2011). Criminology of the unpopular. Criminology & Public Policy, 10(2), 473–82.Google Scholar
Wilcox, P., Quisenberry, N., Cabrera, D.T., & Jones, S. (2004). Busy places and broken windows? Toward defining the role of physical structure and process in community crime models. The Sociological Quarterly, 45(2), 185207.Google Scholar
Wilcox, P. & Tillyer, M.S. (2018). Place and neighborhood contexts. In Weisburd, D. & Eck, J.E. (eds.), Unraveling the crime-place connection: New directions in theory and policy (pp. 121–42). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wilson, J.Q. & Kelling, G.L. (1982). Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety. The Atlantic Monthly, March, 2938.Google Scholar
Woodard, C. (2016, June 16). How Cincinnati salvaged the nation’s most dangerous neighborhood: Leaning on the power of local corporations, officials engineered a renaissance’s in the city’s heart. Politico Magazine. www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/06/what-works-cincinnati-ohio-over-the-rhine-crime-neighborhood-turnaround-city-urban-revitalization-213969Google Scholar
Wortley, R. & Townsley, M. (2016). Environmental criminology and crime analysis: Situating the theory, analytic approach and application. In Wortley, R. & Townsley, M. (eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis (pp. 125). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wright, K. & Nickol, J. (2016). The neighborhood playbook: Activating spaces, developing places. Covington, KY: Yard & Company.Google Scholar
Zidar, M.S., Shafer, J.G., & Eck, J.E. (2018). Reframing an obvious police problem: Discovery, analysis and response to a manufactured problem in a small city. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 12(3), 316–31.Google Scholar
Zipp, S. & Storring, N. (2017). Part two: City building, 1952–1965. In Zipp, S. & Storring, N. (eds.), Vital little plans: The short works of Jane Jacobs (pp. 3743). New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Whose 'Eyes on the Street' Control Crime?
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Whose 'Eyes on the Street' Control Crime?
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Whose 'Eyes on the Street' Control Crime?
Available formats
×