Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T17:48:25.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Counter-Stereotypes and Attitudes Toward Gender and LGBTQ Equality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2024

Jae-Hee Jung
Affiliation:
University of Houston
Margit Tavits
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis

Summary

Insights from social psychology and the gender and politics literature, as well as discussions and campaigns in the policymaking world, suggest that exposure to counter-stereotypes about gender roles might improve people's attitudes toward gender equality and LGBTQ rights. The authors test this expectation by conducting five survey experiments (N=6,916) and a separate, follow-up experiment (N=3,600) in the US context using counter-stereotypical treatments commonly encountered in the real world. They examine both political and non-political attitudes, manipulate stereotypes about both men and women, and provide visual as well as textual stimuli. The treatments undermined stereotypes about the gender roles depicted in the counter-stereotypical exemplars. However, they failed to alter respondents' generic core beliefs about women and men and increase equitable attitudes. The results improve our understanding of how stereotypes contribute to gender and anti-LGBTQ bias.
Get access
Type
Element
Information
Online ISBN: 9781009406628
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 11 April 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abou-Chadi, Tarik and Finnigan, Ryan. 2019. “Rights for Same-Sex Couples and Public Attitudes Toward Gays and Lesbians in Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 52(6): 868895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allport, Gordon W. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Andersen, Robert and Fetner, Tina. 2008. “Economic Inequality and Intolerance: Attitudes toward Homosexuality in 35 Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 52(4): 942958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayoub, Phillip M. and Garretson, Jeremiah. 2017. “Getting the Message Out: Media Context and Global Changes in Attitudes toward Homosexuality.” Comparative Political Studies 50(8): 10551085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, Bert N., Nicolas Hopmann, David and Persson, Mikael. 2015. “Personality Traits and Party Identification Over Time.” European Journal of Political Research 54: 197215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Tiffany D. and Burchard, Stephanie M.. 2013. “‘Engendering’ Politics: The Impact of Descriptive Representation on Women’s Political Engagement in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Comparative Political Studies 46(7): 767790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Tiffany D. and O’Brien, Diana Z.. 2018. “Defending the Realm: The Appointment of Female Defense Ministers Worldwide.” American Journal of Political Science 62(2): 355368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Nichole M. 2015. “Emotional, Sensitive, and Unfit for Office? Gender Stereotype Activation and Support Female Candidates.” Political Psychology 36(6): 691708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Nichole M. 2017. “The Effects of Counterstereotypic Gender Strategies on Candidate Evaluations.” Political Psychology 38(2): 279295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Nichole M. 2020. “Running Local: Gender Stereotyping and Female Candidates in Local Elections.” Urban Affairs Review 56(1): 96123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaman, Lori, Duflo, Esther, Pande, Rohini and Topalova, Petia. 2012. “Female Leadership Raises Aspirations and Educational Attainment for Girls: A Policy Experiment in India.” Science 335(6068): 582586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beaman, Lori, Chattopadhyay, Raghabendra, Duflo, Esther, Pande, Rohini and Topalova, Petia. 2009. “Powerful Women: Does Exposure Reduce Bias?The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124(4): 14971540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Amy B. 2012. “Determinants of Public Support for Same-Sex Marriage: Generational Cohorts, Social Contact, and Shifting Attitudes.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 24(4): 524533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Amy B. and Edward Jones, Philip. 2021. “Experience with Discrimination, Perceptions of Difference, and the Importance of Gender Conformity on Support for Transgender Rights.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 9(5): 10511067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bem, Sandra L. 1981. “Gender Schema Theory: A Cognitive Account of Sex Typing.” Psychological Review 88(4): 354364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhard, Rachel. 2021. “Wearing the Pants(suit)? Gendered Leadership Styles, Partisanship, and Candidate Evaluation in the 2016 U.S. Election.” Politics & Gender 18(2): 513545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, Irene V., Ma, Jennifer E. and Lenton, Alison P.. 2001. “Imagining Stereotypes Away: The Moderation of Implicit Stereotypes through Mental Imagery.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81(5): 828841.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blashill, Aaron J. and Powlishta, Kimberly K.. 2009. “Gay Stereotypes: The Use of Sexual Orientation as a Cue for Gender-Related Attributes.” Sex Roles 61(11–12): 783–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodenhausen, Galen V., Todd, Andrew R. and Richeson, Jennifer A.. 2009. “Controlling Prejudice and Stereotyping: Antecedents, Mechanisms, and Contexts.” In Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping, and Discrimination, ed. Nelson, Todd D.. New York: Psychology Press, pp. 111135.Google Scholar
Boysen, Guy A. and Vogel, David L.. 2007. “Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization in Response to Learning about Biological Explanations of Homosexuality.” Sex Roles 57: 755762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Deborah Jordan. 2011. “Testing the Double Standard for Candidate Emotionality: Voter Reactions to the Tears and Anger of Male and Female Politicians.” Journal of Politics 73(2): 597615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Deborah Jordan. 2013. He Runs, She Runs: Why Gender Stereotypes Do Not Harm Women Candidates. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Broockman, David and Kalla, Joshua. 2016. “Durably Reducing Transphobia: A Field Experiment on Door-To-Door Canvassing.” Science 352(6282): 220–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burgess, Diana and Borgida, Eugene. 1999. “Who Women Are, Who Women Should Be: Descriptive and Prescriptive Gender Stereotyping in Sex Discrimination.” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 5(3): 665692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, Peter. 2018. “Implicit Versus Explicit Attitudes: Differing Manifestations of the Same Representational Structures?Review of Philosophy and Psychology 9(1): 5172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, Erin C. and Barnes, Tiffany D.. 2019. “Reconciling Sexism and Women’s Support for Republican Candidates: A Look at Gender, Class, and Whiteness in the 2012 and 2016 Presidential Races.” Political Behavior 41: 677700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, Erin C. and Holman, Mirya R.. 2018. “Party and Gender Stereotypes in Campaign Attacks.” Political Behavior 40: 785807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifford, Scott and Jerit, Jennifer. 2015. “Do Attempts to Improve Respondent Attention Increase Social Desirability Bias?Public Opinion Quarterly 79(3): 790802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jacob. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2 ed. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Costa, Mia. 2021. “He Said, She Said: The Gender Double Bind in Legislator– Constituent Communication.” Politics & Gender 17: 528551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, Mia and Wallace, Isabel. 2021. “More Women Candidates: The Effects of Increased Women’s Presence on Political Ambition, Efficacy, and Vote Choice.” American Politics Research 49(4): 368380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Gordon B., Kotsadam, Andreas, and Rooth, Dan-Olof. 2021. “Does Integration Change Gender Attitudes? The Effect of Randomly Assigning Women to Traditionally Male Teams.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 136(2): 9871030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damann, Taylor, Siow, Jeremy, and Tavits, Margit. 2023. “Persistence of Gender Biases in Europe.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120 (12): e2213266120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.221326612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dasgupta, Nilanjana and Asgari, Shaki. 2004. “Seeing Is Believing: Exposure to Counter Stereotypic Women Leaders and Its Effect on the Malleability of Automatic Gender Stereotyping.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 40: 642658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, Nilanjana and Greenwald, Anthony G.. 2001. “On the Malleability of Automatic Attitudes: Combating Automatic Prejudice with Images of Admired and Disliked Individuals.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81(5): 800814.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deckman, Melissa and Cassese, Erin. 2021. “Gendered Nationalism and the 2016 US Presidential Election: How Party, Class, and Beliefs about Masculinity Shaped Voting Behavior.” Politics & Gender 17: 277300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diekman, Amanda B. and Eagly, Alice H.. 1999. “Stereotypes as Dynamic Constructs: Women and Men of the Past, Present, and Future.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26(10): 11711188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ditonto, Tessa. 2019. “Direct and Indirect Effects of Prejudice: Sexism, Information, and Voting Behavior in Political Campaigns.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 7(3): 590609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ditonto, Tessa M., Hamilton, Allison J. and Redlawsk, David P.. 2014. “Gender Stereotypes, Information Search, and Voting Behavior in Political Campaigns.” Political Behavior 36: 335358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ditonto, Tessa M., Lau, Richard R. and Sears, David O.. 2013. “AMPing Racial Attitudes: Comparing the Power of Explicit and Implicit Racism Measures in 2008.” Political Psychology 34(4): 287510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2010. “The Impact of Gender Stereotyped Evaluations on Support for Women Candidates.” Political Behavior 32(1): 6988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2014. “Gender Stereotypes, Candidate Evaluations, and Voting for Women Candidates: What Really Matters?Political Research Quarterly 67(1): 96107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, Alice H. and Karau, Steven J.. 2002. “Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice toward Female Leaders.” Psychological Review 109(3): 573598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eagly, Alice H. and Sczesny, Sabine. 2009. “Stereotypes About Women, Men, and Leaders: Have Times Changed?” In The Glass Ceiling in the 21st Century: Understanding Barriers to Gender Equality, ed. Barreto, Manuela, Ryan, Michelle K., & Schmitt, Michael T.. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 2147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Effron, Daniel A., Cameron, Jessica S. and Monin, Benoît. 2009. “Endorsing Obama Licenses Favoring Whites.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45: 590593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellemers, Naomi. 2018. “Gender Stereotypes.” Annual Review of Psychology 69: 275298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finnegan, Eimear, Garnham, Alan and Oakhill, Jane. 2015. “Social Consensus Feedback as a Strategy to Overcome Spontaneous Gender Stereotypes.” Discourse Processes 52(5–6): 434462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnegan, Eimear, Oakhill, Jane and Garnham, Alan. 2015. “Counter-Stereotypical Pictures as a Strategy for Overcoming Spontaneous Gender Stereotypes.” Frontiers in Psychology 6(1291): 115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiske, Susan T. 1998. “Stereotyping, Prejudice, and Discrimination.” In The Handbook of Social Psychology, ed. Gilbert, Daniel T., Fiske, Susan T. and Lindzey, Gardner. 4 ed. Vol. 1 New York: McGraw-Hill, chapter 25, pp. 357411.Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan T. and Stevens, Laura E.. 1993. “What’s So Special About Sex? Gender Stereotyping and Discrimination.” In Gender Issues in Contemporary Society: Applied Social Psychology Annual, ed. Oskamp, Stuart and Costanzo, Mark. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 173196.Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan T. and Taylor, Shelley E.. 2013. Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, Andrew R. 2015. “Attitudes toward Transgender Rights: Perceived Knowledge and Secondary Interpersonal Contact.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 3(3): 398416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, Andrew R., Haider-Markel, Donald P., Lewis, Daniel C. et al. 2018. “Challenged Expectations: Mere Exposure Effects on Attitudes about Transgender People and Rights.” Political Psychology 39(1): 197216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawronski, Bertram and Bodenhausen, Galen V.. 2006. “Associative and Propositional Processes in Evaluation: An Integrative Review of Implicit and Explicit Attitude Change.” Psychological Bulletin 132(5): 692731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Georgeac, Oriane and Rattan, Aneeta. 2019. “Progress in Women’s Representation in Top Leadership Weakens People’s Disturbance with Gender Inequality in Other Domains.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 148(8): 14351453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glick, Peter and Fiske, Susan T.. 1997. “Hostile and Benevolent Sexism: Measuring Ambivalent Sexist Attitudes toward Women.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 21: 119135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, Peter, Lameiras, Maria, Fiske, Susan T. et al. 2004. “Bad but Bold: Ambivalent Attitudes toward Men Predict Gender Inequality in 16 Nations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86(5): 713728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goh, Jin X., Hall, Judith A. and Rosenthal, Robert. 2016. “Mini Meta-Analysis of Your Own Studies: Some Arguments on Why and a Primer on How.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 10(10): 535549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, Jessica J., Woodzicka, Julie A., and Wingfield, Lylan C.. 2010. “The Effects of Gender Stereotypic and Counter-Stereotypic Textbook Images on Science Performance.” The Journal of Social Psychology 150(2): 132147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haider-Markel, Donald P. and Joslyn, Mark. 2005. “Attributions and the Regulation of Marriage: Considering the Parallels between Race and Homosexuality.” Political Science and Politics 38(2): 233240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider-Markel, Donald P. and Josyln, Mark. 2008. “Understanding Beliefs About the Origins of Homosexuality and Subsequent Support for Gay Rights: An Empirical Test of Attribution Theory.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72(2): 291310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, Andrew and Malhotra, Neil. 2013. “Childhood Socialization and Political Attitudes: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” Journal of Politics 75(4): 10231037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilman, Madeline E. 2012. “Gender Stereotypes and Workplace Bias.” Research in Organizational Behavior 32: 113135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, Mirya R., Merolla, Jennifer L. and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.. 2011. “Sex, Stereotypes, and Security: A Study of the Effects of Terrorist Threat on Assessments of Female Leadership.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 32: 173192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, Mirya R., Merolla, Jennifer L. and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.. 2016. “Terrorist Threat, Male Stereotypes, and Candidate Evaluations.” Political Research Quarterly 69(1): 134147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honderich, Ted. 1995. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huddy, Leonie and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37(1): 119147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurwitz, Jon and Peffley, Mark. 1997. “Public Perceptions of Race and Crime: The Role of Racial Stereotypes.” American Journal of Political Science 41(2): 375401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald and Norris, Pippa. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben and Rosenbluth, Frances. 2010. Women, Work, and Politics: The Political Economy of Gender Inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Philip Edward, Brewer, Paul R., Young, Dannagal G., Lambe, Jennifer L., and Hoffman, Lindsay H.. 2018. “Explaining Public Opinion Toward Transgender People, Rights, and Candidates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 82(2): 252278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joslyn, Mark R. and Haider-Markel, Donald P.. 2016. “Genetic Attributions, Immutability, and Stereotypical Judgments: An Analysis of Homosexuality.” Social Science Quarterly 97(2): 376390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joy-Gaba, Jennifer A. and Nosek, Brian. 2010. “The Surprisingly Limited Malleability of Implicit Racial Evaluations.” Social Psychology 41(3): 137146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, Jae-Hee and Tavits, Margit. 2021a. “Do Referendum Results Change Norm Perceptions and Personal Opinions?Electoral Studies 71: 102307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, Jae-Hee and Tavits, Margit. 2021b. “Valence Attacks Harm the Electoral Performance of the Left but not the Right.” Journal of Politics 83(1): 277290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalla, Joshua L. and Broockman, David E.. 2020. “Reducing Exclusionary Attitudes through Interpersonal Conversation: Evidence from Three Field Experiments.” American Political Science Review 114(2): 410425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kite, Mary E. and Deaux, Kay. 1987. “Gender Belief Systems: Homosexuality and the Implicit Inversion Theory.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 11: 8396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, Jeffrey W. 2000. “Do Citizens Apply Gender Stereotypes to Infer Candidates’ Ideological Orientations?Journal of Politics 62(2): 414429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenig, Anne M. and Eagly, Alice H.. 2014. “Evidence for the Social Role Theory of Stereotype Content: Observations of Groups’ Roles Shape Stereotypes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 107(3): 371392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krook, Mona Lena. 2010. Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kunda, Ziva and Oleson, Kathryn C.. 1995. “Maintaining Stereotypes in the Face of Disconfirmation: Constructing Grounds for Subtyping Deviants.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68(4): 565580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kunda, Ziva and Oleson, Kathryn C.. 1997. “When Exceptions Prove the Rule: How Extremity of Deviance Determines the Impact of Deviant Examples on Stereotypes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72(5): 965979.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lai, Calvin K., Marini, Maddalena, Lehr, Steven A. et al. 2014. “Reducing Implicit Racial Preferences: I. A Comparative Investigation of 17 Interventions.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143(4): 17651785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, calvin K., Skinner, Allison L., Cooley, Erin, et al. 2016. “Reducing Implicit Racial Preferences: Intervention Effectiveness across Time.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 145(8): 10011016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehavot, Keren and Lambert, Alan J.. 2007. “Toward a Greater Understanding of Antigay Prejudice: On the Role of Sexual Orientation and Gender Role Violation.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 29(3): 279292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leicht, Carola, Gocłowska, Malgorzata A., Van Breen, Jolien A., de Lemus, Soledad, and Randsley de Moura, Georgina. 2017. “Counter-stereotypes and Feminism Promote Leadership Aspirations in Highly Identified Women.” Frontiers in Psychology 8: 883.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, Daniel C., Flores, Andrew R., Haider-Markel, Donald P. et al. 2017. “Degrees of Acceptance: Variation in Public Attitudes toward Segments of the LGBT Community.” Political Research Quarterly 70(4): 861875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Gregory B. 2011. “The Friends and Family Plan: Contact with Gays and Support for Gay Rights.” Policy Studies Journal 39(2): 217238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsey, Linda L. 1997. Gender Roles: A Sociological Perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Liu, Xuan and Zuo, Bin. 2006. “Psychological Mechanism of Maintaining Gender Stereo-types.” Advances in Psychological Science 3: 456-461.Google Scholar
Madon, Stephanie. 1997. “What Do People Believe About Gay Males? A Study of Stereotype Content and Strength.” Sex Roles 37: 663685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matland, Richard E. 1994. “Putting Scandinavian Equality to the Test: An Experimental Evaluation of Gender Stereotyping of Political Candidates in a Sample of Norwegian Voters.” British Journal of Political Science 24(2): 273292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, J. Scott. 2005. “The Political Foundations of Support for Same-Sex Marriage in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 38(4): 841866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cecilia Hyunjung, Mo. 2015. “The Consequences of Explicit and Implicit Gender Attitudes and Candidate Quality in the Calculations of Voters.” Political Behavior 37(2): 357395.Google Scholar
Mummolo, Jonathan and Peterson, Erik. 2018. “Demand Effects in Survey Experiments: An Empirical Assessment.” American Political Science Review 113(2): 517529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, Aaron T. and Herek, Gregory M.. 2013. “Heterosexuals’ Attitudes toward Transgender People: Findings from a National Probability Sample of U.S. Adults.” Sex Roles 68: 738753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nosek, Brian A., Smyth, Frederick L., Sriram, Natarajan et al. 2009. “National Differences in Gender–Science Stereotypes Predict National Sex Differences in Science and Math Achievement.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(26): 1059310597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Brien, Diana Z. and Rickne, Johanna. 2016. “Gender Quotas and Women’s Political Leadership.” American Political Science Review 110(1): 112126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsson, Maria and Martiny, Sarah E.. 2018. “Does Exposure to Counterstereotypical Role Models Influence Girls’ and Women’s Gender Stereotypes and Career Choices? A Review of Social Psychological Research.” Frontiers in Psychology 9(2264): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Operario, Don and Fiske, Susan T.. 2004. “Stereotypes: Content, Structures, Processes, and Context.” In Social Cognition, ed. Brewer, M. B. and Hewstone, M.. Malden: Blackwell, pp. 120141.Google Scholar
Oswald, Frederick L., Mitchell, Gregory, Blanton, Hart, Jaccard, James and Tetlock, Philip E.. 2013. “Predicting Ethnic and Racial Discrimination: A Meta-Analysis of IAT Criterion Studies.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 105(2):171192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mark, Peffley, Hurwitz, Jon and Sniderman, Paul M.. 1997. “Racial Stereotypes and Whites’ Political Views of Blacks in the Context of Welfare and Crime.” American Journal of Political Science 41(1):3060.Google Scholar
Pérez, Efrén O. and Tavits, Margit. 2019. “Language Influences Public Attitudes toward Gender Equality.” Journal of Politics 81(1): 8193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez, Efrén O. and Tavits, Margit. 2022. Voicing Politics: How Language Shapes Public Opinion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, Thomas F. 2009. “Secondary Transfer Effect of Contact: Do Intergroup Contact Effects Spread to Noncontacted Outgroups?Social Psychology 40: 5565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, Thomas F. and Tropp, Linda R.. 2006. “A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90(5): 751783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rainey, Carlisle. 2014. “Arguing for a Negligible Effect.” American Journal of Political Science 58(4): 10831091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 46(1): 2034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, Brian F. 2022a. “Optimizing the Measurement of Sexism in Political Surveys.” Political Analysis 30(3): 364380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, Brian F. 2022b. “The Heightened Importance of Racism and Sexism in the 2018 US Midterm Elections.” British Journal of Political Science 52(1): 492500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Monica C. 2014. “The Effects of Gender-Bending on Candidate Evaluations.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 35(1): 5577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Monica C., Bos, Angela L. and DiFilippo, Madeline. 2022. “Gender Role Violations and Voter Prejudice: The Agentic Penalty Faced by Women Politicians.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 43(2): 117133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonovits, Gábor, Kézdi, Gábor and Kardos, Péter. 2018. “Seeing the World through the Other’s Eye: An Online Intervention Reducing Ethnic Prejudice.” American Political Science Review 112(1): 186193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tankard, Margaret E. and Levy Paluck, Elizabeth. 2017. “The Effect of a Supreme Court Decision Regarding Gay Marriage on Social Norms and Personal Attitudes.” Psychological Science 28(9): 13341344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tavits, Margit, Schleiter, Petra, Homola, Jonathan, and Ward, Dalston. 2024. “Fathers’ Leave Reduces Sexist Attitudes.” American Political Science Review 118(1): 488494.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055423000369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavits, Margit and Pérez, Efrén O. 2019. “Language Influences Mass Opinion toward Gender and LGBT Equality.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116(34): 1678116786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, Jack. 2022. “Attitudes towards LGBT Individuals After Bostock v. Clayton County: Evidence From a Quasi Experiment.” Political Research Quarterly 75(4): 13741385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentino, Nicholas A. and Brader, Ted. 2011. “The Sword’s Other Edge: Perceptions of Discrimination and Racial Policy Opinion after Obama.” Public Opinion Quarterly 75(2): 201226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Renee and Crocker, Jennifer. 1983. “Cognitive Processes in the Revision of Stereotypic Beliefs.” Attitudes and Social Cognition 45(5): 961977.Google Scholar
West, Candace and Zimmerman, Don H.. 1987. “Doing Gender.” Gender and Society 1(2): 125151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, Andrew L. 2014. “Male and Female He Created Them: Gender Traditionalism, Masculine Images of God, and Attitudes toward Same-Sex Unions.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 53(3): 479496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuo, Bin, Wen, Fangfang, Wang, Miao and Wang, Yang. 2019. “The Mediating Role of Cognitive Flexibility in the Influence of Counter-Stereotypes on Creativity.” Frontiers in Psychology 10(105): 111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Counter-Stereotypes and Attitudes Toward Gender and LGBTQ Equality
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Counter-Stereotypes and Attitudes Toward Gender and LGBTQ Equality
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Counter-Stereotypes and Attitudes Toward Gender and LGBTQ Equality
Available formats
×