Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T05:51:27.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in the Problems of God

God and Political Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2022

Tyler Dalton McNabb
Tyler Dalton McNabb
Affiliation:
Saint Francis University, Pennsylvania

Summary

How is God related to the state? Could the existence of robust political authority somehow be evidence for God? In this Element, the author explores these questions, pro and con, looking at various major positions. At the start of the volume, they defend a political argument for God's existence. Having motivated a theistic account of political authority, they then discuss the role God plays or could play in classical liberalism, Marxism, and postliberalism. While they sympathetically survey each political theory in turn, at the end of each section, they raise various objections to the view being discussed. Finally, at the end of the Element, the author articulates desiderata for theists who are looking for political frameworks.
Get access

Keywords

Huemersocial contractnatural lawpolitical authorityliberalism
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in the Problems of God
Online ISBN: 9781009269117
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 08 December 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberigo, Norman Tanner. (1990). “Council of Trent, Session 7, Decree on Baptism, Canon 14, 3 March 1547.” In Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils. Volume 2. Ed. Tanner, Norman. London: Sheed and Ward, p. 684.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. (2014) De Rengo. Milwaukee, WI: Divine Providence Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, Samuel. “Socialism.” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/socialis.Google Scholar
Baggett, David, and Walls, Jerry L.. (2011). Good God: The Theistic Foundations of Morality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Erik, and McNabb, Tyler Dalton. (2018). Plantingian Religious Epistemology and World Religions. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Barrett, Justin L. (2011). Cognitive Science, Religion, and Theology from Human Minds to Divine Minds. West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Press.Google Scholar
Bergmann, Michael. (2002). “Common Sense Naturalism.” In Naturalism Defeated? ed. Beilby, James. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 61–90.Google Scholar
Besong, Brian. (2018). An Introduction to Ethics: A Natural Law Approach. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books.Google Scholar
Boer, Roland. (2011). Criticism of Religion: On Marxism and Theology. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
Boer, Roland (2014). In the Vale of Tears: On Marxism and Theology. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Pope, Boniface VIII (1302). “Unam Sanctum.” Papal Encyclicals Online. www.papalencyclicals.net/bon08/b8unam.htm.Google Scholar
Corradini, Antonella, Galvan, Sergio, and Lowe, E. J.. (2010). Analytic Philosophy without Naturalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Craig, William Lane and Moreland, J. P.. (2012). The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
D’Agostino, Fred, and Gaus, Gerald. (2021). “Contemporary Approaches to the Social Contract.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/contractarianism-contemporary.Google Scholar
Deneen, Patrick J. (2018). Why Liberalism Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dignitatis Humanae. (1965). www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651207_dignitatis-humanae_en.html.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. (1986). Law’s Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Feser, Edward. (2009). Aquinas. London: Oneworld.Google Scholar
Feser, Edward (2017). Five Proofs of the Existence of God. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, John. (2011). Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, John (2013). “John Finnis on Thomas Pink.” In Reason, Morality and Law: The Philosophy of John Finnis, ed. Keown, John and George, Robert. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 566–577.Google Scholar
Foot, Phillipa. (2002). Virtues and Vices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
H. (1879). “Interview with Karl Marx.” Chicago Tribune, January 5.Google Scholar
Harvey, Ramon. (2019). The Qur’an and the Just Society. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Hazony, Yoram. (2018). The Virtue of Nationalism. New York: Hachette.Google Scholar
Hsiao, Tim. (2017). “The Perverted Faculty Argument.” Philosophia Christi 19: 207–216.Google Scholar
Huemer, Michael. (2001). Skepticism and the Veil of Perception. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Huemer, Michael (2013). The Problem of Political Authority. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Huemer, Michael, and Layman, Daniel. (2021). Is Political Authority an Illusion? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hume, David. (2009). A Treatise of Human Nature. Portland, OR: Floating Press.Google Scholar
Leo, Pope XIII (1885). “Immortale Dei.” Papal Encyclicals Online. www.vatican.va/content/leo-xiii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_01111885_immortale-dei.html.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1960). Two Treatises of Government. Ed. Peter Laslett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1980). Second Treatise of Government. Ed. McPherson, Crawford Brough. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1988). Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
March, Andrew. (2019). The Caliphate of Man. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. (1964). Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. New York: International.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl (1974). “Critique of the Gotha Program.” In Marx and Engels Collected Works. New York: International, pp. 79–94.Google Scholar
McNabb, Tyler Dalton. (2018). Religious Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McNabb, Tyler (In Press). “A Plantingian Response to Public Reason Accessibilism.” In The Palgrave Handbook to Religion and State in the Western Hemisphere, ed. Shannon Holzer.Google Scholar
McNabb, Tyler Dalton, and Baldwin, Erik. (2020). “Religious Epistemology in Analytic Theology.” In T&T Clark Handbook of Analytic Theology, ed. Arcadi, James and Turner, James. London: Bloomsbury Press, 33–44.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. (1963). Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, ed. Robson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Fred. (1998). “Presuppositions of Aristotle’s Politics.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-politics/supplement2.html.Google Scholar
Moller, Dan. (2014). “Justice and the Wealth of Nations.” Public Affairs Quarterly 28/2: 95–101.Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark. (2017) God’s Own Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Neill, Jeremy, and McNabb, Tyler Dalton. (2019). “By Whose Authority: A Political Argument for God’s Existence.” European Journal of Philosophy of Religion 11/2: 163–189.Google Scholar
Neilsen, Kai. (1999). “Cosmopolitanism, Universalism and Particularism in the Age of Nationalism and Multiculturalism,” Philosophical Exchange 29: 3–34.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pink, Thomas. (2017). “Dignitatis Humanae: Continuity after Leo XIII.” In “Dignitatis Humanae Colloquium” Dialogos. Volume 1, ed. Crean, Thomas and Alan, Fimister. Aurora, CO: Dialogos Institute, 105–146.Google Scholar
Pink, Thomas (Unpublished). “John Finnis’ Alternative History of Trent.” www.academia.edu/37861294/John_Finniss_Alternative_History_of_Trent.Google Scholar
Pope Pius, IX. (1864). “Quanta Cura.” Papal Encyclicals Online. www.papalencyclicals.net/pius09/p9quanta.htm.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin. (1993). Warrant and Proper Function. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (2000). Warranted Christian Belief. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (2010). Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (2012). “Darwinist Materialism Is Wrong.” The New Republic. https://newrepublic.com/article/110189/why-darwinist-materialism-wrong.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. (2009). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Salzillo, Raphael. (2021). “The Mereology of Thomas Aquinas.” Philosophy Compass 16/3: 1–10.Google Scholar
Sandeford, David. (2018). “Organizational Complexity and Demographic Scale in Primary States.” Royal Society Open Science. 5: 171–237.Google Scholar
Skalko, John. (2019) Disordered Actions. Neunkirchen, Germany: Editones Scholasticae.Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard. (2004). The Existence of God. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tollefsen, Deborah. (2007). “Group Testimony.” Social Epistemology 21: 299–311.Google Scholar
Turner, Deny. (1975). “Can a Christian Be a Marxist?” New Black Friars 56: 244–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallier, Kevin. (Forthcoming). All the Kingdoms of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vallier, Kevin 2014. Liberal Politics and Public Faith: Beyond Separation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bas, Van der Vossen, and Brennan, Jason. (2018). In Defense of Openness: Why Global Freedom Is the Humane Solution to Global Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. (1999). Law and Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Walls., Jerry L., and Dougherty, Trent A.. (2018). Two Dozen (or so) Arguments for God: The Plantinga Project. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, Nicholas. (2012a). “Accounting for Political Authority of the State.” In Understanding Liberal Democracy. Ed. Wolterstorff, Nicholas and Cueno, Terence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, Nicholas (2012b). The Might and the Almighty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

God and Political Theory
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

God and Political Theory
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

God and Political Theory
Available formats
×