Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T20:20:29.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in American Politics

The Origins and Consequences of Congressional Party Election Agendas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2023

Scott R. Meinke
Scott R. Meinke
Affiliation:
Bucknell University, Pennsylvania

Summary

This Element examines congressional party election agendas, asking first how they originate and what priorities within the party they strategically represent and, second, how they shape post-election legislative activity and policymaking. After surveying post-1980 agenda efforts, it focuses on two prominent cases, the Republican Contract with America (1994) and the Democratic New Direction for America (2006). Using archived records and other qualitative evidence, it shows that both agendas were leadership-driven but were developed in lengthy and relatively inclusive processes. Quantifying agenda content, it demonstrates that the parties strategically skewed agenda promises toward select segments of the caucus, as measured in bill introduction priorities, and the promises echoed leadership messaging from speeches and floor motions in the Congress before the election. After winning a majority, both parties shifted the House's legislative activity sharply toward agenda priorities, but the impact on policy outcomes was substantially constrained.
Get access

Keywords

party agendasparty platformsContract with AmericaNew Direction for Americacampaign promises
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in American Politics
Online ISBN: 9781009264860
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 23 February 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, A. I. (2013). The Polarized Public? Why American Government is so Dysfunctional. Upper Saddle River: Pearson.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, A. I. (2018). The Great Alignment: Race, Party Transformation, and the Rise of Donald Trump. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramowitz, A. I. & Webster, S. (2016). “The Rise of Negative Partisanship and the Nationalization of U.S. Elections in the 21st Century.” Electoral Studies 41(March):12–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, E. S. & Wilkerson, J. D. (2012). Congress and the Politics of Problem Solving. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Adler, E. S. & Wilkerson, J. D. (2019). “Congressional Bills Project: 1991–2010, NSF 00880066 and 00880061.” www.comparativeagendas.net/us.Google Scholar
American Political Science Association. (1950). “Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System.” American Political Science Review 44(3, Part 2):15–36.Google Scholar
Asmussen Mathew, N. & Kunz, M. (2017). “Recruiting, Grooming, and Reaping the Rewards: The Case of GOPAC in the 1992 Congressional Elections.” Congress & the Presidency 44(1):77–101.Google Scholar
Azari, J. R. (2014). Delivering the People’s Message: The Changing Politics of the Presidential Mandate. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bader, J. B. (1996). Taking the Initiative: Leadership Agendas in Congress and the “Contract with America.” Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bara, J. (2005). “A Question of Trust: Implementing Party Manifestos.” Parliamentary Affairs 58(3):585–599.Google Scholar
Bendavid, N. (2007). The Thumpin’: How Rahm Emanuel and the Democrats Learned to be Ruthless and Ended the Republican Revolution. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Bonilla, T. (2022). The Importance of Campaign Promises. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borghetto, E. & Belchior, A. M. (2020). “Party Manifestos, Opposition and Media as Determinants of the Cabinet Agenda.” Political Studies 68(1):37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, K. G. (2007). “The Ideological Origins of the New Democrat Movement.” Louisiana History: The Journal of the Louisiana Historical Association 48(July):273–294.Google Scholar
Brouard, S., Grossman, E., Guinaudeau, I., Persico, S., & Froio, C. (2018). “Do Party Manifestos Matter in Policy-Making? Capacities, Incentives and Outcomes of Electoral Programmes in France.” Political Studies 66(4):903–921.Google Scholar
Caillaud, B. & Tirole, J. (1999). “Party Governance and Ideological Bias.” European Economic Review 43(4–6):779–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, S. & Krook, M. L. (2009). “Analysing Women’s Substantive Representation: From Critical Mass to Critical Actors.” Government and Opposition 44(2):125–145.Google Scholar
Clark, J. H. (2017). “The Motion to Recommit in the US House.” In Straus, J. R. & Glassman, M. E., eds., Party and Procedure in the United States Congress, pp. 63–80, 2nd ed. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Continetti, M. (2022). The Right: The Hundred Year War for American Conservatism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Cox, G. W. & McCubbins, M. D. (2005). Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crespin, M. H. & Rohde, D. (2022). “Political Institutions and Public Choice Roll-Call Database.” https://ou.edu/carlalbertcenter/research/pipc-votes/.Google Scholar
Curry, J. M. & Lee, F. E. (2020). The Limits of Party: Congress and Lawmaking in a Polarized Era. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, C. & Stimson, J. (2012). Ideology in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagan, E. J. (2018). “Marching Orders? U.S. Party Platforms and Legislative Agenda Setting 1948–2014.” Political Research Quarterly 71(4):949–959.Google Scholar
Fagan, E. J. (2021). “Issue Ownership and the Priorities of Party Elites in the United States, 2004–2016.” Party Politics 27(1):149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenno, R. F. Jr. (1997). Learning to Govern: An Institutional View of the 104th Congress. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Froio, C., Bevan, S., & Jennings, W. (2017). “Party Mandates and the Politics of Attention: Party Platforms, Public Priorities and the Policy Agenda in Britain.” Party Politics 23(6):692–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galvin, D. J. (2010). Presidential Party Building: Dwight D. Eisenhower to George W. Bush. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gelman, J. (2020). Losing to Win: Why Congressional Majorities Play Politics Instead of Make Laws. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Gimpel, J. G. (1996). Fulfilling the Contract: The First 100 Days. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Green, M. N. (2015). Underdog Politics. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, M. N. & Crouch, J. (2022). Newt Gingrich: The Rise and Fall of a Party Entrepreneur. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Greene, Z. & O’Brien, D. Z. (2016). “Diverse Parties, Diverse Agendas: Female Politicians and the Parliamentary Party’s Role in Platform Formation.” European Journal of Political Research 55(3):435–453.Google Scholar
Grossmann, M. & Hopkins, D. A. (2016). Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gulati, G. J. (2004). “Members of Congress and Presentation of Self on the World Wide Web.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 9(1):22–40.Google Scholar
Harbridge, L. (2015). Is Bipartisanship Dead? Policy Agreement and Agenda-Setting in the House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harmel, R. (2018). “The How’s and Why’s of Party Manifestos: Some Guidance for a Cross-National Research Agenda.” Party Politics 24(3):229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmel, R., Tan, A. C., Janda, K., & Smith, J. M. (2018). “Manifestos and the Two Faces of Parties: Addressing Both Members and Voters with One Document.” Party Politics 24(3):278–288.Google Scholar
Harris, D. B. (2005). “Orchestrating Party Talk: A Party-Based View of One-Minute Speeches in the House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 30(1):127–141.Google Scholar
Harris, D. B. (2013). “Let’s Play Hardball: Congressional Partisanship in the Television Era.” In Frisch, S. A. & Kelly, S. Q., eds., Politics to the Extreme: American Political Institutions in the Twenty First Century, pp. 93–115. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Harris, D. B. (2019). “Anticipating the Revolution: Michel and Republican Congressional Reform Efforts.” In Mackaman, F. H. & Kelly, S. Q., eds., Robert H. Michel: Leading the Republican House Minority, pp. 186–215. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Heberlig, E. S. & Larson, B. A. (2012). Congressional Parties, Institutional Ambition, and the Financing of Majority Control. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Heersink, B. (2018). “Party Brands and the Democratic and Republican National Committees, 1952–1976.” Studies in American Political Development 32(1):79–102.Google Scholar
Hopkins, D. A. (2017). Red Fighting Blue: How Geography and Electoral Rules Polarize American Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, D. J. (2018). The Increasingly United States: How and Why American Political Behavior Nationalized. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, T. (2018). “Assessing Minority Party Influence on Partisan Issue Attention in the US House of Representatives, 1989–2012.” Party Politics 24(2):197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, T. & Koger, G. (2022). “Party Messaging in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Political Research Quarterly 75(3): 829–845. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129211029712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, G. C. (1996). “The 1994 House Elections in Perspective.” Political Science Quarterly 111(2):203–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, G. C. (2015). “It’s Nothing Personal: The Decline of the Incumbency Advantage in US House Elections.” Journal of Politics 77:861–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D. R. (2015). “Partisan Polarization and the Effect of Congressional Performance Evaluations on Party Brands and American Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 68(4):785–801.Google Scholar
Kabaservice, G. (2012). Rule and Ruin: The Downfall of Moderation and the Destruction of the Republican Party. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kittilson, M. C. (2010). “Women, Parties, and Platforms in Postindustrial Democracies.” Party Politics 17(1):66–92.Google Scholar
Klinkner, P. A. (1994). The Losing Parties: Out-Party National Committees, 1956–1993. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Koopman, D. L. (1996). Hostile Takeover: The House Republican Party, 1980–1995. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Lee, F. E. (2009). Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the US Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lee, F. E. (2016). Insecure Majorities: Congress and the Perpetual Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lee, F. E. (2017). “Legislative Parties in an Era of Alternating Majorities.” In Gerber, A. S. & Schickler, E., eds., Governing in a Polarized Age: Elections, Parties, and Political Representation in America, pp. 115–142. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. S. (2011). “The Motion to Recommit in the House of Representatives: Effects and Recent Trends.” CRS Report for Congress RL34757.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J. (2003). “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97(4):515–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, D. R. (1974). Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, D. R. (2005). Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946–2002. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, D. R. (2022). “Datasets and Materials: Divided We Govern.” https://campuspress.yale.edu/davidmayhew/datasets-divided-we-govern/.Google Scholar
Meinke, S. R. (2016). Leadership Organizations in the House of Representatives: Party Participation and Partisan Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Pearson, K. & Dancey, L. (2011). “Elevating Women’s Voices in Congress: Speech Participation in the House of Representatives.” Political Research Quarterly 64(4):910–923.Google Scholar
Peters, R. M. Jr. & Rosenthal, C. S. (2010). Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the New American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, D. A. M., Grossback, L. J., Stimson, J. A., & Gangl, A. (2003). “Congressional Response to Mandate Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 47(3):411–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philpot, T. S. (2007). Race, Republicans, and the Return of the Party of Lincoln. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Policy Agendas Project. (2019). “The Policy Agendas Project at University of Texas at Austin.” www.comparativeagendas.net/us.Google Scholar
Procopio, C. H. (1999). A Brave Newt World? Republican Campaign Strategies in the 1994 Congressional Elections. PhD Thesis. Indiana University.Google Scholar
Rae, N. C. (1998). Conservative Reformers: The Freshman Republicans in the 104th Congress. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Rae, N. C. & Campbell, C. C. (1999). “From Revolution to Evolution: Congress under Republican Control.” In Rae, N. C. & Campbell, C. C., eds., New Majority or Old Minority: The Impact of Republicans in Congress, pp.1–17. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Ranney, A. (1954). The Doctrine of Responsible Party Government: Its Origins and Present State. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Reinhard, D. W. (1983). The Republican Right since 1945. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. M. (2005). “Minority Rights and Majority Power: Conditional Party Government and the Motion to Recommit in the House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 30(2):219-234.Google Scholar
Rohde, D. W. (1991). Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. New Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbluth, F. M. & Shapiro, I. (2018). Responsible Parties: Saving Democracy from Itself. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Royed, T. J., Baldwin, J. N., & Borrelli, S. A. (2019). “The United States.” In Naurin, E., Royed, T. J., & Thomson, R., eds., Party Mandates and Democracy: Making, Breaking, and Keeping Elections Pledges in Twelve Countries, 101–121. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Russell, A. (2021). Tweeting is Leading: How Senators Communicate and Represent in the Age of Twitter. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, A. & Wen, J. (2021). “From Rhetoric to Record: Linking Tweets to Legislative Agendas in Congress.” Journal of Legislative Studies 27(4):608–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shogan, C. J. & Glassman, M. E. (2017). “Longitudinal Analysis of One-Minute Speeches in the House of Representatives.” In Straus, J. R. & Glassman, M. E., eds., Party and Procedure in the United States Congress, pp. 131–149, 2nd ed. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Sinclair, B. (1995). Legislators, Leaders, and Lawmaking: The US House of Representatives in the Postreform Era. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, B. (2008). “Leading the New Majorities.” PS: Political Science and Politics 41(1):89–93.Google Scholar
Smith, S. S. (2007). Party Influence in Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somer-Topcu, Z., Tavits, M., & Baumann, M. (2020). “Does Party Rhetoric Affect Voter Perceptions of Party Positions.” Electoral Studies 65(June):102–153.Google Scholar
Stewart, C. P. & Jenkins, J. A. (2013). Fighting for the Speakership: The House and the Rise of Party Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stid, D. (1996). “Transformational Leadership in Congress?” Paper prepared for presentation at the 1996 American Political Science Association Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
Strahan, R. (2007). Leading Representatives: The Agency of Leaders in the Politics of the US House. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Sulkin, T. (2005). Issue Politics in Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sulkin, T. (2011). The Legislative Legacy of Congressional Campaigns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sulkin, T. & Schmitt, C. (2014). “Partisan Polarization and Legislators’ Agendas.” Polity 46(3):430–448.Google Scholar
Theriault, S. M. (2015). “Party Warriors: The Ugly Side of Party Polarization in Congress.” In Thurber, J. A. & Yoshinaka, A., eds., American Gridlock: The Sources, Character, and Impact of Political Polarization, pp. 152–170. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Victor, J. N. & Reinhardt, J. Y. (2018). “Competing for the Platform: How Organized Interests Affect Party Positioning in the United States.” Party Politics 24(3):265–277.Google Scholar
Zelizer, J. E. (2020). Burning Down the House: Newt Gingrich, the Fall of a Speaker, and the Rise of the New Republican Party. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Origins and Consequences of Congressional Party Election Agendas
  • Scott R. Meinke, Bucknell University, Pennsylvania
  • Online ISBN: 9781009264860
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Origins and Consequences of Congressional Party Election Agendas
  • Scott R. Meinke, Bucknell University, Pennsylvania
  • Online ISBN: 9781009264860
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Origins and Consequences of Congressional Party Election Agendas
  • Scott R. Meinke, Bucknell University, Pennsylvania
  • Online ISBN: 9781009264860
Available formats
×