Element contents
The Pedagogy of Watching Shakespeare
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 April 2024
Summary
The pedagogy of acting out Shakespeare has been extensive. Less work has been done on how students learn through spectatorship. This element will consider all within the current context of Shakespeare teaching in schools. Using grounded research, it will include work undertaken on a schools National Theatre production of Macbeth, as well as classroom-based, action research, using a variety of digital performances of Shakespeare plays. Both find means of extending student knowledge in unexpected ways through encountering interpretations of Shakespeare that the students had not considered. In reflecting on the practice of watching Shakespeare in an educational context- both at the theatre and in the classroom- this Element hopes to offer suggestions for how teachers might re-think the ways in which they present Shakespeare performed to their students particularly as a powerful way of building personal and critical responses to the plays.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009118743Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 16 May 2024
References
References
Aebischer, P. (2019). South Bank Shakespeare goes global: Broadcasting from Shakespeare’s Globe and the National Theatre. In Aebischer, P., Greenhalgh, S. and Osbourne, L. E. (eds.), Shakespeare and the ‘Live’ Theatre Broadcast Experience. London: The Arden Shakespeare. Pp. 113–32.Google Scholar
Aebischer, P. (2020). Shakespeare, Spectatorship and the Technologies of Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker-Bell, A. (2020). Linguistic Justice: Black Language, Literacy, Identity, and Pedagogy. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, S. (2005 (1997)). Theatre Audiences: A Theory of Production and Reception. 2nd ed. London: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Bennett, S. (2019). Shakespeare’s new marketplace: The places of events cinema. In Aebischer, P., Greenhalgh, S. and Osbourne, L. E. (eds.), Shakespeare and the ‘Live’ Theatre Broadcast Experience. London: The Arden Shakespeare. Pp. 41–58.Google Scholar
Brady, M. (2015). From Verona to Ramallah: Living in a state of emergency. Changing English 22(4), 365–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulman, J. C. (2008). Shakespeare Re-dressed: Cross-Gender Casting in Contemporary Performance. Vancouver, BC: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.Google Scholar
Chakravarty, U. (2021). What is the history of actors of color performing in Shakespeare in the UK? In Thompson, A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare and Race. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, J. (2013a). ‘Every child’s birthright’? Democratic entitlement and the role of canonical literature in the English National Curriculum. Curriculum Journal 24(1), 50–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, J. (2013b). Constructions of Shakespeare in the secondary school curriculum. PhD. King’s College London.Google Scholar
Coles, J. (2020). Wheeling out the big guns: The literary canon in the English classroom. In Davison, J. and Daly, C. (eds.), Debates in English Teaching. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Core Knowledge. www.coreknowledge.org/about-us/e-d-hirsch-jr. Accessed 24 August 2021.Google Scholar
Department for Education (DfE). (2014). National Curriculum in England: English. www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-english-programmes-of-study. Accessed 28 January 2022.Google Scholar
Department of Education and Science (DES). (1975). A Language for Life [Bullock Report]. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department of Education and Science (DES). (1989). English for Ages 5 to 16. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Departmental Committee of the Board of Education (1921). The Teaching of English in England: Being the Report of the Departmental Committee Appointed by the President of the Board of Education to Inquire into the Position of English in the Educational System of England [Newbolt Report]. London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Doecke, B. and Mead, P. (2018). English and the knowledge question. Pedagogy, Culture & Society 26(2), 249–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaglestone, R. (2021). ‘Powerful Knowledge’, ‘Cultural Literacy’ and the Study of Literature in Schools. Impact 26: Philosophical Perspectives on Education Policy. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. (ed.). (2022). Teaching Shakespeare 22. Stratford-Upon-Avon: British Shakespeare Association.Google Scholar
Erne, L. (2013). Shakespeare As Literary Dramatist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escolme, B. (2005). Talking to the Audience: Shakespeare, Performance, Self. London: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Flores, N. and Rosa, J. (2015). Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harvard Educational Review 85(2), 149–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Gibb, N. (2015). How E. D. Hirsch came to shape UK government policy knowledge and the curriculum. In Simons, J. and Porter, N. (eds.). A Collection of Essays to Accompany E. D. Hirsch’s Lecture at Policy Exchange. London: Policy Exchange. Pp. 12–20.Google Scholar
Grier, M. (2021). Are Shakespeare’s plays racially progressive? The answer is in our hands. In Thompson, A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare and Race. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 237–53.Google Scholar
Hadfield, A. (2021). Race in Shakespeare’s histories. In Thompson, A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare and Race. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 62–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, K. (1996). Things of Darkness: Economies of Race and Gender in Early Modern England. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harkin, P. (2005). The reception of reader-response theory. College Composition and Communication. 56(3), 410–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, E. D. (1987). Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Iser, W. (1978). The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, K. (1989). Right Turn: The Conservative Revolution in Education. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Kemp, S. K. (2019). ‘In that dimension grossly clad’: Transgender rhetoric, representation, and Shakespeare. Shakespeare Studies 47, 113–20.Google Scholar
Klett, E. (2009). The king’s many bodies: Fiona Shaw’s Richard II (1995–96). In Klett, E. (ed.), Cross Gender Shakespeare and English National Identity: Wearing the Codpiece. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Pp. 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaPerle, C. M. (2021). Race in Shakespeare’s tragedies. In Thompson, A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare and Race. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lister, D (1993). Was Shakespeare a Tory? The Bard is now a subject of political controversy. Independent, 3 January.Google Scholar
Leitch (2009). Film Adaptation and Its Discontents: From Gone with the Wind to The Passion of Christ. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Marenbon, J. (1987). English Our English: The New Orthodoxy Examined. London: Centre for Policy Studies.Google Scholar
Marshall, B. (2000). English Teachers: The Unofficial Guide. Researching the Philosophies of English Teachers. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
Marshall, B. (2003). The write kind of knowledge in English. Critical Quarterly 45(4), 113–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, B. (2020). Reading the canon via synthetic phonics: Texts as political pawns. In Marshall, B., Manuel, J., Pasternak, D. and Rowsell, J. (eds.), The Bloomsbury Handbook of Reading Perspectives and Practices. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Mastery Curriculum (2019). www.englishmastery.org/programme. Accessed 10 June 2019.Google Scholar
Morgan, W. and Wyatt-Smith, C. M. (2000). Im/proper accountability: Towards a theory of critical literacy and assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 7(1), 123–42.Google Scholar
Pascall, D. (1992). The cultural dimension in education. The Royal Society of Arts. London: The National Foundation for Arts Education.Google Scholar
Pearson, Edexcel (2017). Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in English Literature (9ET0) Sample Assessment Materials First Certification 2017 Issue 5. https://qualifications.pearson.com/content/dam/pdf/A%20Level/English%20Literature/2015/Specification%20and%20sample%20assessments/A-English-Literature-issue-5.pdf. Accessed 15 December 2021.Google Scholar
Pimlico Academy (2019). www.pimlicoacademy.org/page/?title=Our+Curriculum&pid=20 Accessed 10 June 2019.Google Scholar
Pratt, M. (1986). Interpretive strategies/strategic interpretations on Anglo-American reader response criticism. In Arac, J. (ed.), Postmodernism and Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Pp. 26–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, P. (1991). Unlocking the box: Shakespeare on film and video. In Aers, L. and Wheale, N. (eds.), Shakespeare in the Changing Curriculum. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rosenshine, B. (2012). Principles of Instruction: Research-Based Strategies That All Teachers Should Know. Springer: American Educator.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, W. Macbeth (2016). Directed by Justin Audibert. The National Theatre, London.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, W. Romeo and Juliet (2016). Directed by Beijan Sheibani. The National Theatre, London.Google Scholar
Smith, E. (ed.). (2021). Shakespeare Survey 74: Shakespeare and Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, A. (2011). Passing Strange: Shakespeare, Race and Contemporary America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, A. (2017). How should we listen to Audiences? Race, reception, and the audience survey. In Bulman, J. C. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Shakespeare and Performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Thompson, A. (ed.) (2021). The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare and Race. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willingham, D. (2009). Why Don’t Students Like School? A Cognitive Scientist Answers Questions about How the Mind Works and What It Means for Your Classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Wyatt-Smith, C., and Murphy, J. (2001). What counts as writing assessment? An Australian move to mainstream critical literacy. English and Education 35(1), 12–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yandell, J (2001). What’s in a name, or electric cars for all. Changing English 8(2), 145–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yandell, J. (2013). The social construction of meaning: Reading Animal Farm in the classroom. Literacy 47(1), 50–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yandell, J. (2017). Culture, knowledge and power: What the Conservatives have learnt from E. D. Hirsch. Changing English 24(3), 246–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yandell, J. (2020). Reader response in the classroom. In Marshall, B., Manuel, J., Pasternak, D. and Rowsell, J. (eds.), The Bloomsbury Handbook of Reading Perspectives and Practices. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Yandell, J., and Brady, M. (2016). English and the politics of knowledge. English in Education 50(1), 44–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, H. (2010). Embodying Black Experience: Stillness, Critical Memory, and the Black Body. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press (ACLS Humanities E-Book).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, M. (2013). Overcoming the crisis in curriculum theory: A knowledge-based approach. Journal of Curriculum Studies 45(2), 101–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, M., and Lambert, D., with Roberts, C. and Roberts, M. (2014). Knowledge and the Future School: Curriculum and Social Justice. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Hamlet ( 2018 ). Directed by Rhodri Huw, Robert Icke [Filmed Stage Production] UK, Almeida Film Production.Google Scholar
Hamlet ( 2018 ). Directed by Rhodri Huw, Robert Icke [Filmed Stage Production] UK, Almeida Film Production.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by